The Takeoff of a Multifunctional Approach

ASADOV architects presented a concept of developing the old airport in Rostov-on-Don. A four kilometer long boulevard stretching in the stead of the former runway and the block housing, multiplied by a wide range of business and public functions, possibly including the governmental one, will allow this area to claim the role of a new attraction point with a high level of self-sufficiency.

Written by:
Alyona Kuznetsova
Translated by:
Anton Mizonov

27 June 2022

Object

Architect:

Firm:

ASADOV architects https://www.asadov.studio

The idea of renovating the territory of Rostov-on-Don’s old airport was in the air for more than ten years – since the day that the city received the right to host the games of the World Soccer Championship 2018. Already then it was clear that once the modern Platov airport would be put into operation, the territory of the old airport, situated significantly closer to the developed part of the city – it is 6.4 kilometers away from the Government Building but a whopping 35 kilometers away from Platov – will become a good greenfield venue for new construction and all-rounded development. Its area is about 360 hectares, which is comparable to Moscow’s Skolkovo.

One of the first concepts for developing the territory was prepared by the French architect Anthony Bechu, then the work was joined by Aleksey Polyansky, while the “South Town Planning Center”, headed by Sergey Trukhachev, initiated an alternative project and presented it to the public.

zooming — The concept of development of the territory of the old airport in Rostov-on-Don

Copyright: © “NGO Southern Urban Development Center”

In addition, recommendations for the strategy of development and construction density were given by ДОМ.рф, and the “construction set” for the mid-rise blocks, close in scale to a historical city, was taken from the arsenal of one of the Russian construction companies that successfully tested it in other regions.

All these projects and concepts were studied and considered, and the proposals that they had in them were taken into account by ASADOV architects who started working on their own proposal for the territory of the old Rostov-on-Don airport in 2021. One must note that ASADOV architects do have a relevant expertise in this area – specifically, the architects not only designed the new Saratov airport but also worked on the concept of subsequent development of the territory of the old airport in the same city.

A Multi-City

The main feature of the new district, inherited from the preceding concepts and supported by the city administration is that it must by no means become a “sleeping belt” neighborhood. The public buildings and offices – of remarkably different character, up to the government center, where, so far hypothetically, the city administration could reside – occupy almost as much space as the housing stock. The “Aerocity” district is meant to become the new center of attraction, and the driver of developing the multi-centric character of the city.

Igor Dalaksakuashvili, Chief Architect of the Rostov region

The concept of the old airport is being formed not as just another Liventsovka 3.0 residential area, but as a new social and business center for the Rostov agglomeration. Yes, it will have a residential function, but this area is not only for those who will live in it. That is why the planned volume of housing stock on the territory of the old airport is at least one and a half times less than in the new residential areas.

Alexey Polyansky, Chairman of the Board of the Union of Architects of the Rostov Region

This area, of course, has never been considered as an exclusively residential area. Rather, it must become a new social and administrative center of the city, which could take over part of the functions of the central part of the city, thus relieving it. This area must also carry some new functions that would strengthen the position of Rostov as the capital of the Southern Federal District.

To a certain extent, the placement of public and business functions was prompted by the specifics of this area: its wider part is situated south, closer to the developed areas, while higher up towards northeast lies an elongated triangle. In the middle, the north border is adjoined by an industrial park that requires 300m of protection area – meaning, you cannot build housing stock here, but you can indeed build administrative and public buildings. Hence, the maximum of multifunctionality is concentrated in the middle part of the territory, forming a “waist” of sorts. In the north end, there is a triangle of the congress and exhibition center.

Meanwhile, this solution, definitely correct, in addition to the reasons of technical nature and the goodwill of the city administration, has two other interesting features. One – the area is not just filled with offices in addition to housing, but really, in the good way, can function as a small city within itself – which totally falls in both with the rule of modern urban planning and with the original conditions: the giant scale of the territory, its near-complete freedom of any preceding development, and the lucky position next to the “nearest satellite”, the highly developed part of Rostov.

In addition to the governmental center, the tax agency and office buildings, the multifunctional “waist” also has in it: a technology park / innovation center, a sports, a medical, a cultural center, and even an archive cluster. The center of the wide southern, mostly residential, part will be a cultural cluster with a choreographic school and an anchor in the form of a concert hall – a kind of response to the convention and exhibition center located in the north.

The southern part, predominantly residential, will be centered around a cultural cluster with a choreographic school and the “anchor” of the concert hall – something like a response to the northern convention and exhibition center.

The European Quarters

Meanwhile, in addition to the diversity of the program, which was, after all, was specified in the brief, the ASADOV architects tried to distribute the land sites as much as possible in such a way as to avoid mono-functionality – specifically, they tried to “inject” the residential function, mostly hotels, into the central business part.

The same task is solved the concert and exhibition halls placed more to the south, and, of course, fitness centers, schools and medical facilities, as well as the rent-out outside contours of the ground floors of the residential blocks, most of which are concentrated in the wide south area, and are meant to be built first because it is also necessary to provide economic support for the project through the sale of housing.

Andrey Asadov, «ASADOV architects», general director of the studio

There is a clear residential and public area on the territory, but it was important for us to mix the functions, introducing elements of the social structure into the housing, and vice versa. Separate sports and cultural facilities are evenly integrated into the residential blocks, and infrastructure was also placed in the first floors of houses, by analogy with the Moscow renovation program – this automatically enlivens the streets and makes them feel habitable. For renovation, by the way, when we made a competitive project, together with economists we calculated the optimal ratio of residential and non-residential functions in the city. The optimal proportion turned out to be 80 percent of housing and 20 percent of infrastructure. This 20 percent is enough for all able-bodied residents of the grounds to have jobs – in the service sector, in coworking spots or small office spaces. In the Rostov project, at the expense of all public facilities, this ratio is higher – 60 to 40 – which will provide additional jobs to adjacent areas and automatically relieve the city center.

Yet another feature of the designed construction, mostly residential, is the city-block typology and small numbers of floors ranging from 6 to 10, interspersed with high-rise accents. Nearby, along the Berberovskaya Street, stands Veresaevo housing complex 20 stories high – while the new Aerocity district is offering an alternative from the field of new urbanism and modern trends: relatively small closed-perimeter blocks, car-free yards, and sections of different colors and different heights for better facade diversity. Such an approach is close to the ASADOV architects – but it was also set by the standards issued by Strelka and ДОМ.рф, as well as the developer’s “construction” set that was offered to the architects for their work. “As a matter of fact, one of our tasks was adapting the ДОМ.рф construction standards to the unique conditions of this specific site – Andrey Asadov shares – And the task was far from easy due to the large number of various restrictions; a painstaking work on detailing was required. But it was fun as well.”

The new houses are intended to house almost 57 thousand people. The social infrastructure will include seven kindergartens, six schools, a few outpatient facilities and an ambulance station.

The linear park: from “agora” to the park (and temple)

All the concepts for developing the territory of Rostov-on-Don’s old airport are ultimately united by one common solution – the idea of turning the former runway into a pedestrian area, the main axis that will tie in the string of public spaces and residential blocks. There are several reasons for that, chief of them being that dismantling a runway is a very expensive thing to do – it was kept even at Moscow’s Khodynka.

In addition, any new area needs, of course, a public axis – a spatial “backbone” capable of tying in the entire territory. In the project, the main boulevard is about 4 kilometers long; it starts in the northeast part from the convention center and leads in a perfectly straight line southwest, towards the “pivot” of the road junction that connects the territory to the developed part of the city. Three kilometers out of these four are heavy concrete slabs, dismantling which would be extremely problematic, but if you keep them as is, they will turn the public axis into a “concrete desert”. To avoid this, the architects proposed to treat the runway as an operated roof, and liven it up – not the entire length but at least some fragments – in accordance with the “green roof” principle. On the concrete field, the architects placed green islands, pavilions, and landscaping elements. Above the ring of the southern junction, there is a duplicate pedestrian ring with ramps running in different directions, which is meant to improve the connection with the city.

In the wider – and predominantly residential – part, the boulevard is adjoined by a park. The architects compare it to the Central Park in New York: it is rectangular, and there will be a pond in the middle. The park was also there in the “alternative” project by Sergey Trukhachev, but it was carried more to the south. Now this park is a large-scale widening of the boulevard, the nucleus of the territory, and the vestibule of the concert hall, which is located on the southern end of the green rectangle. Its northern side stops against the Temple of Xenia of St. Petersburg; there will be yet another temple of a smaller size standing next to the automotive/pedestrian junction, and a chapel in the northern part of the grounds. Hence, the architects jokingly call the axis boulevard “a road from agora (whose role is played by the congress center) to the temple.

The “affluents” of the green boulevard penetrate into the depth of the quarters, entwining the entire district in a network of leisure and recreational spaces. The boulevard is crossed by seven traversal drives, and yet another parallel drive duplicates it along its entire length.

The concept developed by ASADOV architects was approved by the governor council; on its basis, RNIIPI Gradistroitelstva developed the project for making a master plan of territory, which will shortly be showcased at public hearings. Then individual development of every stage will ensue. It is expected that the construction will begin already in 2023, the building of housing complexes, engineering infrastructure, and social facilities will be synchronized.

Architect:

Firm:

ASADOV architects https://www.asadov.studio

27 June 2022

Headlines now

Object

About Uzbekistan With Love

The restoration of the National Pavilion of Uzbekistan at VDNKh, completed in 2025, was at times like a detective story and at times like a drama. Many architectural details seemed to have been irretrievably lost, the 25-meter-high rotunda was on the verge of collapse, and the nuances of the decoration had to be reconstructed from split-second frames of a color documentary film. But the MV-PROEKT architectural bureau managed to untangle this web of problems and literally reassemble one of the most graceful buildings at VDNKh.

Object

Lighthouse on the Cliff

One of the neighborhoods in Desnarechye, a large-scale district under construction in New Moscow, is being designed by the architectural company Krupny Plan (KPLN). The site has its advantages and challenges: on the one hand, the river is close by and the landscape is expressive; on the other, there is a highway and a change in elevation. The architects decided to emphasize the site’s existing “texture”: they placed a lighthouse-like tower as a landmark on the natural high ground, made the podium a continuation of the cliff, and reflected the proximity of the river in the architecture of the sectional buildings.

Object

Geology-Scale Architecture

A “geological,” nature-inspired form for large-scale complexes is one of the important themes of our time; it suits large volumes much better than pilasters and cornices. The project with the geographical name Latitude 54, proposed by Rais Baishev and the architects of Ostozhenka, likewise “grows” into the ground through a preserved ravine, while upward it rises in slabs of buildings resembling chalk mountains, with courtyards and terraces carved into their mass like caves. Its distinctive feature is the abundance of shared spaces open to both city residents and local inhabitants, along with an emphasis on high-quality construction. Large expanses of glazing, and even centralized air conditioning. Let us examine the project in context.

Object

Full-Cycle Art

A school requires order, regulations, and discipline, while creativity calls for freedom, experimentation, and improvisation. In the building of the Siberian Higher School of Musical and Theatrical Arts in Kemerovo, MV-PROEKT made an attempt to reconcile these contradictions: to contain a complex and ever-changing creative life within a strict, rationally organized architectural form.

Object

The Romance of a Saint Petersburg Courtyard

Studio 44’s approach to the redevelopment of the Liviz winery site appears to be an important precedent for Saint Petersburg: the architects are adapting not only designated heritage buildings but also other more-than-a-century old structures, revealing their distinctive character and giving them new public or residential uses. New architecture is interwoven with the old, creating a range of clearly defined or deliberately complex urban spaces. Blocks of different typologies are complemented by a pedestrian promenade that makes the environment much more permeable and lively. And all of this is framed by a sense of romance and nostalgia for the historic city.

Object

The Voice of the Amur

MV-PROJECT has won a competition for the façades of the Khabarovsk Regional Academic Musical Theater. The architects took a bold approach, proposing a striking wave-like envelope inspired by the waters of the Amur, along with landscaped rooftop terraces. The concept won an absolute majority of the public vote. We take a closer look at the proposal, its feasibility, and its rich imagery, which invites associations with the work of Ivan Aivazovsky and Katsushika Hokusai.

Object

A Theater for Figure Skaters, or Cherchez La Femme

Ice arenas are typologically close to industrial buildings: enormous windowless halls with minimal architectural embellishment. In designing Navka Arena, Yuliy Borisov and the UNK architects did not try to fight the utilitarian nature of the structure. Instead, they concentrated all of its expressive elements in one place – the central façade. A parabolic canopy, a monumental sculpture of a figure skater, and her shadow rendered in perforated metal transform an ordinary sports “box” into an architectural statement about ice, movement, and theater.

Object

The Soft Forms of a New Enlightenment

The school that will rise amid the new high-rise neighborhoods of Set and Veer can fairly be called a landmark of the future district. The educational environment was designed by IMAGO, a firm specializing in learning spaces, while the façade concept was selected through a competition. The winner, GAFA, proposed a regular grid of three-dimensional modules that creates an intriguing effect of “soft” architecture. The imagery of this solution appeals to children of different ages and suits the stature of the educational complex, which will be handed over to the highly rated School No. 1329 upon completion.

Object

Projection of a Spiral, Projection of a Wave

Architects from Mezonsproekt have designed a high-rise residential complex of four towers near the intersection of Novaya Riga Highway and the Moskva River. Its landmark status is motivated both by the proximity of Rublyovo-Arkhangelskoye and its SberCity development, and by the theme of two intersecting flows: water and traffic. The architects have organized the façade pattern around the supergraphic image of a pixelated spiral, intended to animate – and perhaps even transform – the perception of the buildings’ prismatic volumes.

The Ever-Changing Mist

T+T Architects has developed a concept for a premium business center featuring “living” façades that change their configuration depending on weather conditions, time of day, and the occupants’ needs, transforming the building into an urban-scale installation. The idea of endless variability continues inside, with interiors designed to accommodate different scenarios of use. Some of the engineering solutions proposed for the project are being introduced to the Russian commercial real estate market for the first time.

Review

A Small Book of Farewell

The book dedicated to Valery Kanyashin, published by his colleagues at Ostozhenka Architects, is remarkably small. It fits comfortably in the palm of your hand, more like sketchbook than an actual architectural monograph. Combined with its tiny print run, the result is an intentionally unglamorous, decidedly non-representational publication – one that is made “for friends”. Yet the way it weaves together projects, texts, photographs, and drawings is remarkably subtle. Perhaps this is precisely how one comes to understand a person, at least a little, by tracing the course of their creative life.

Object

Win-Win

For Perm, the opening of the new home for its Art Gallery – guardian of the famous collection of Perm wooden sculpture – marks the end of a 35-year search for a building worthy of a collection that had long outgrown the city cathedral that had served as its only home. Sergey Tchoban considers the project one of the most important of his career in Russia and emphasizes that it deliberately avoids “iconic” architecture in favor of contextual appropriateness. We traveled to Perm to explore both the building and its extensive new exhibition, and found that, much like Tchoban’s other museum projects, it is conceived in a distinctly contemporary way: the old and the new do not merely coexist but reinforce one another through contrast, sharpening the visitor’s perception of the museum.

Object

A Score for 12th Line

“Amo”, a residential complex designed by Stepan Liphart on Vasilyevsky Island, brings together three architectural ideas: the cour d’honneur, a piazzetta-like courtyard, and imagery borrowed from Renaissance architecture. Together, these elements make a contemporary apartment complex feel more humane, extending the theme of individuality in residential design. The effect is achieved through a carefully calibrated vocabulary of moderately standardized components: recessed façade panels enriched with sgraffito ornament, a disciplined hierarchy of cornices and moldings, and a series of bespoke decorative details. The development combines residential and hotel sections that frame the restored wooden mansion of the Brömme brothers.

Object

Riverfront Façade

The Premium residential complex, designed by KPLN, has been built in the town of Pushkino, just outside Moscow, on the banks of the Serebryanka River. Its two towers reinforce the scale of the high-rise development that emerged here in the 2000s, while introducing a bolder architectural form that reads more effectively from a distance, along with a system of contrasts and design strategies responding to the site’s waterfront setting. One of the project’s distinctive features is a series of metal discs that conceal air-conditioning units while serving as an additional decorative layer.

Object

A Construction Set for Adult Life

In the project by Atrium, the new building for Moscow’s School No. 2107, designed to accommodate 1,100 students, is above all a carefully organized system of learning and recreational spaces. On the one hand, it is complex and highly articulated; on the other, it remains intuitive, safe, and conducive to personal growth. In a sense, it serves as a model of life in the city – a place where one must communicate, make decisions, plan ahead, and find a balance between work and leisure. All of these scenarios are reflected, to varying degrees, in the building’s architecture.

Object

Axis of Rotation

One of the installations in the Masters exhibition at Arch Moscow featured a futuristic yet entirely feasible project by Vladimir Plotkin and TPO Reserve – a tower that could be assembled from prefabricated factory-made modules. The concept even incorporates the possibility of slow rotation (!). Using the same module, one could create a residential block, a giant cantilevered “arrow”, or virtually any other configuration you could possibly think of. Let us take a closer look at the module itself.

A New Magazine and a New Ranking

The magazine Expert.Urban has only just appeared, apparently timed to coincide with Arch Moscow. It is published with the support of VEB.RF and Strelka KB. We have not yet had time to read it cover to cover, but the impression so far is that it consists of about eighty percent interviews. It also features a distinctly “Strelka-style” initiative: a ranking of the “Best Architect of Moscow in the 21st Century”. So, who came out on top? Sergey Skuratov. Yuri Grigoryan took second place, and Sergei Tchoban came third.

Interview

Oleg Shapiro: “We design life as a whole, in all of its diversity”

Wowhaus has long since outgrown its association with “urban improvement” projects alone. One of its newer directions is neo-industrialization. Another is large-scale master planning. Yet work on Gorky Park is once again underway – only now on a more systematic and far-reaching level. In this interview, we simultaneously revisit Rem Koolhaas, Strelka, and the history of attention to the “urban environment”, while also exploring what exactly Wowhaus is working on today and how the company operates – with its nine divisions and approximately 160 employees.

Object

Red Card for Copyright

The development concept for the territory of Shinnik Stadium in Yaroslavl, prepared by PI ARENA, took second place in an open call competition. The architects proposed a unified structure combining a football arena, a hotel, and the headquarters of PSB Bank, with carefully considered usage scenarios. However, the competition was organized in such a way that the team ultimately chose to forgo the prize money in order to retain their copyright.

News

CinemaHologram

Not long ago, the Moscow authorities approved the project for a new House of Cinema complex by Kleinewelt Architekten. The original 1968 building could not be preserved – yet the architects managed to save its stained-glass panels, metal reliefs, and even the volumetric parameters of the structure, which will continue to house the Union of Cinematographers and cinema halls. The project’s main focal point, however, will be a residential tower. We examine its sculptural qualities and its allusions within the Moscow context.

Contest Results

Form as Method: TPO Reserve

At the core of the concept developed by Vladimir Plotkin and TPO Reserve lies an unconventional morphology that addresses functional challenges beyond purely formal concerns. Above all, however, it serves expressiveness and creates a rare kind of spatial and emotional experience, as becomes evident when examining the project’s key solutions. We studied it in detail, and it was all worth it. Our interpretation is that what drives this project is neither style nor even metaphor, but rather a method.

Object

Mound of Memory

The competition proposal for a memorial complex on the Pulkovo Heights by Studio 44 will not be realized, yet it deserves attention as an intriguing example of how architecture can symbolize traumatic events and thereby contribute to their processing and integration into human experience. The architects also succeed in combining memorial and recreational functions without slipping either into excessive dramatization or oversimplification. The project develops ideas explored in two earlier competition entries that likewise remained unbuilt – the Museum of the Siege of Leningrad and the Tuchkov Buyan park. It also recalls the mound-like hill that Alexander Nikolsky embodied in the form of the now-lost stadium on Krestovsky Island.

Object

Home Base

Working on the new building for Letovo Junior School – opened to students in autumn 2025 in the MSU Valley – the architects of UNK, following the client’s vision, subordinated both façades and interiors to the theme of “home”. Multiple variations of pitched roofs, a city skyline traced across glass balustrades, wooden textures, and a whole series of micro-spaces for retreat within public areas are all at the disposal of primary and middle school students. We take a closer look at the new school building – and at how it interprets current trends in educational environments.

Object

Doubles Match

The architecture of the Tennis Palace built in Luzhniki Olympic Complex, designed by Arena Design Institute, was shaped by three factors: the proximity of the brutalist Druzhba Arena, the closeness of the Moskva River and the metro bridge overpass, as well as the specifics of the function – tennis courts require large spans, abundant light, yet at the same time protection from direct sunlight. The architects divided the building into several blocks, playing on contrast, which is further emphasized by the façades developed in collaboration with TPO Reserve and Vladimir Plotkin.

Object

Microdynamics of Macroprocesses

Given the proximity of the multifunctional complex SOLOS to Sokolniki Park and to a major transport hub, Kleinewelt Architekten embedded in the design of the two high-rise towers a sense of dynamism more characteristic of natural phenomena than of man-made objects. Without the authors’ diagrams, this logic is not easy to decipher, although the eye immediately detects a pattern and tries to grasp it. It seems to us that one tower contains the impulse of a bud about to open, while the other evokes the movement of a lithospheric plate. Let us try to unravel it together.

Report

The Space of Post-Cubism

Sergei Tchoban and Alexandra Sheiner, of Studio CHART, created for the exhibition of “post-cubist” sculpture by Beatrice Sandomirskaya – a talented and even “mainstream” artist, yet almost unknown even to art historians – a space akin to her sculptural language: solidly built, confidently stereometric, and subtly expressive. It curves, emphasizing the mass of the sculpture, envelops the viewer, and guides them from one perspective to another, from a generic “shrine” to a “Madonna”.

Object

The Value of Open Space

For the site near the Barrikadnaya Metro Station, Sergey Skuratov developed five projects between 2020 and 2025. Two of them were ones that won the client’s invitation-only competitions. The fifth was recently selected by the Mayor of Moscow for implementation. The project is vivid and sculptural, expressive, eye-catching, and engaging – very much in line with the spirit of our time. And yet, this project is mid-rise rather than tall. In its northwestern part, near the metro and Druzhinnikovskaya Street, it shapes a comfortable urban environment. On the opposite side, it opens up, allowing sunlight into the courtyard and creating a spatial pause within the dense city fabric. How it is organized, what geometric principles underlie it, and why it takes this form – all this is explored in our article.

Coming From the Cold

The ArchBukhta Festival remains one of the few events in Russia where participants go through the entire process of creating an architectural object – from concept to construction. And they do so on the shores of Lake Baikal, in dedication to it. This year, GAFA took part and shared its experience: a local legend, a team-specific design code, friendship, as well as ice skating and endurance in freezing temperatures all contributed to gaining something more than just an award.

Object

Gothic Panorama

The Panorama residential complex is known for the fact that there is no panorama in it, nor is there a panorama of it – instead, there is a “viewing slit” that opens up a glimpse of the Neo-Gothic Polish church. And the opening itself is Gothic, S-shaped. It was also this building that started the fashion for colored pixelated facades and colored glass in Moscow; yet it has remained the best example so far. Anatoly Belov on irony in the Panorama residential complex. In memory of Valery Knyashin.

Object

Symphony of Water and Brick

The Alter residential complex, designed by Stepan Liphart and built on a bend of the Okhta River, is an example of a “drawn house”: the number of original architectural details is virtually immeasurable. As a result, ribs, projections, and recesses create a picturesque silhouette even without a significant variation in height. Both composition and material respond to the proximity of the river and to the red-brick factory building dating back to the early 20th century. The project was also significantly shaped by recommendations from the city’s chief architect. More details in our article.