A Flyover in Watercolor

For the 100th anniversary of Vladimir Vasilkovsky, the architectural office of Evgeny Gerasimov is reflecting on the Ushakov Flyover, which was designed with input from this artist and architect. In this article, we are showing its watercolors and sketches, including the preliminary ones that were not included in the final project, as well as speaking about the importance of architectural drawing.

Written by:
Alyona Kuznetsova
Translated by:
Anton Mizonov

11 June 2021

Object

Enginenriya

Architect:

Firm:

Evgeniy Gerasimov & partners http://www.egp.spb.ru/

The Ushakov Flyover has merged with the surrounding scenery so completely that it is hard to imagine that there was a time when it was not there. Just as hard is imagining the sheer scale of traffic jams that occurred on the Kamennoostrovsky and Primorsky avenues before this flyover was built – today, this is an important transportation hub with stoplight-free traffic, rare for this city, which makes it easier for the cars to leave from and get back to the Primorsky residential area during the week, and to get to gulf and the lakes of the Kurortny area on the weekend.

The city had long (since the late 1980s, most likely) planned to build a flyover in this place, also considering the tunnel option. The location of the flyover is not just strategic but semantic as well: it serves as the dividing line between the historical part of the city and the area of new construction. This is where the granite-clad waterfronts end, and lush parks, tenements and mansions give way to prefabricated houses and massive modern residential complexes. The view of the neoclassical building of the Maritime Academy, and the garden and mansion of Elizaveta Saltykova that the Ushakov Bridge commands is the last “historical” one in this direction, and this is why it was important for the architects to avoid ruining it by blocking the perspective by an engineering structure. Incidentally, when the flyover of the Kolomyazhsky passage was built, the city was not too scrupulous about it – it is just a highway made of asphalt and concrete, just like all of its surroundings.

The general designer of the flyover was Lengiproinzhproekt; the subcontractor was the Transport Institute, and it was the subcontractor that invited Evgeny Gerasimov to take part in the architectural part of the project. Evgeny Gerasimov, in turn, invited Vladimir Vasilkovsky, one of the authors of the Ushakov Bridge, an active architect, artist, and ceramist, who at that moment was already 78 years old.

The Ushakov Bridge was something that Vladimir Vasilkovsky designed half a century before he was invited to design the Ushakov Flyover: in the 1950s, the wooden bridge of the Bolshaya Nevka River (not to be confused with Neva) was replaced by a metallic one, with massive granite supports and a drawbridge span – the old drawbridge pavilion is currently occupied by the chapel of the Most Holy Mother of God icon at the Church of the Nativity of John the Baptist. The bridge, originally called “Stroganov”, was renamed into Ushakov, and decorated with columns with a magnificent completion of banners and bas-relief images of naval commanders; an ornament with a composition of an anchor, a star and a laurel was put on the cast-iron railings.

The task of Yevgeny Gerasimov's studio was to give the utilitarian construction an aesthetic embodiment – to find a memorable and appropriate image, which, at the same time, would not draw too much attention. Due to the fact that the flyover was to become a part of the already complete architectural ensemble, the architects had no doubts that they would have to develop the naval theme, which is present both in toponymy and the decoration of the Ushakov bridge and the Ushakov academy.

To make the construction lighter, the architects drew the trusses, referring to the landing stage of the Vitebsk railway station – they created a transparent and openwork look.

As for the highlights, there were many options. The chief architect of the project, Viktor Khivrich, shows sketches on which he drew rotundas, similar to those that can be seen on the Staro-Kalinkin bridge or the Lomonosov bridge – ranging from quite classical to Art Nouveau or very modern in the spirit of steampunk of the 2000s. On another sheet, the spars and rigging, combined with the fence balusters and structural elements of the floors, turn the flyover into a kind of shipyard. Dozens of options for street lights, steering wheels, anchors, masts and heraldic elements clearly demonstrate the creative search that future architects will probably be exempt from because they are planning to cancel the creative exam.

1 / 13
2 / 13
3 / 13
4 / 13
5 / 13
6 / 13
7 / 13
8 / 13
9 / 13
10 / 13
11 / 13
12 / 13
13 / 13

Evgeny Gerasimov, «Evgeniy Gerasimov & partners»

My belief is that an architect who cannot draw is not quite an architect. The computer itself cannot produce anything; it is just a tool. An architect must have a trained eye and a trained hand, which is something that can only be achieved by drawing. All working material for projects is born through drawing; the idea from the head is displayed by hand on a sheet of paper. If you have this skill, your eye and your hand become a single whole – and only then you achieve a result.

Most of the elements drawn by the architects were not included in the final project, which is only natural because the idea crystallizes only after a good deal of preparation work and a good deal of accumulated “texture”. The sketches are the underground part of the iceberg that the observer cannot see but can surely sense. The quality of execution, on the other hand, makes these drawings look like anything but “sketches” – these are fully-fledged works of architectural graphics. Particular awe in the spirit of “they don’t do such things anymore, the secret is lost” is caused by the presentations of Vladimir Vasilkovsky – with watercolors glazed and calligraphic signatures, even where the reason is quite common – like “I’ve gone on sick leave, here is my phone number”. Looking at these drawings, you see what pleasure the master took in his work, and the productiveness of this state when you don’t have to hurry anywhere.

1 / 10
2 / 10
3 / 10
4 / 10
5 / 10
6 / 10
7 / 10
8 / 10
9 / 10
10 / 10

At the insistence of the then chief architect of the city, Oleg Kharchenko, the abundance of ideas had to be “quieted down” somewhat: rotundas, masts and steles would have blocked the view of the Naval Academy. Then the idea was born to decorate the flyover with ship cannons – this is a small and calm element in outlines, but at the same time quite expressive. Parts for the cannons were made at the Vulkan factory – they are hollow inside, the prototype was the model can be seen in the Artillery Museum. The cannons stand on granite supports, the striping of which should resemble a sailor’s vest. The metal brackets supporting the pylons are decorated with scale ornaments. Flanking the central span of the flyover, the cannons and pillars became the main focus of the entire structure.

1 / 17
2 / 17
3 / 17
4 / 17
5 / 17
6 / 17
7 / 17
8 / 17
9 / 17
10 / 17
11 / 17
12 / 17
13 / 17
14 / 17
15 / 17
16 / 17
17 / 17

In accordance with the sketches by Vladimir Vasilkovsky, to decorate the dual street lights, they manufactured helmets and fish figures – a little bit fairy-tale-like and ironic, very much in the spirit of the master. According to the reminiscences of his contemporaries, Vladimir Vasilkovsky, even in his old age, remained “the fountain of ideas”, and retained an amazing strength of his hand and clarity of mind. Another thing that was not implemented was, for example, a round shield with an allegory of two elements that are eternally controversial in St Petersburg – earth and water. And the street lights became the main accent for those who drive on this flyover.

1 / 3
2 / 3
3 / 3

Compared to the sketches, the Ushakov Flyover looks more reserved, and it seems that few interesting details survived into the final project, but ultimately every constructive element got full artistic justification and “tied” the flyover to its surroundings so strongly that it became the flesh and blood of this place. The way we see it, dozens of sketches made the author focus and meditate on this place, thus transferring his genius on paper and making it form the new spirit of this city, just as native and animate as its caryatids and Mephistopheles.

Architect:

Firm:

Evgeniy Gerasimov & partners http://www.egp.spb.ru/

11 June 2021

Headlines now

Object

Elevation 5642

The Genplan Institute of Moscow has developed a comprehensive development project for three ski resorts in the Caucasus, which have been designated as special economic zones of the tourism and recreation type. The first of these zones is Elbrus. The project includes the construction of new ski runs, cable cars, and hotels, as well as the modernization of stations and improvements to the Azau tourist meadow. To expand the audience and enhance year-round appeal, a network of eco-trails is also being developed. In this article, we provide a detailed breakdown of each stage.

Object

The IT Town

Taking the example of the first completed phase of the “U” district, we examine how the new neighborhood in Innopolis will be organized. T+T Architects and HADAA formed a well-balanced and ingenious master plan with different types of housing, a green artery, a system of squares, and a park in the town’s central part.

Object

The Heart Lies Within

The second-phase building of the Evgeny Primakov School already won multiple awards while still in the design stage. Now that it’s completed, some unfinished nuances remain – most notably, the exposed ceiling structures, which ideally should have been concealed. However, given the priority placed on the building’s volumetric composition, this does not seem critical. What matters more is the “Wow!” effect created by the space itself.

Object

Magnetic Forces

“Krylatskaya 33” is the first large-scale residential complex to appear amidst the 1980s “micro-districts” that harmoniously coexist with the forests, the river, the slopes, and the sports infrastructure. Despite its imposing scale, the architects of Ostozhenka managed to turn the complex into something that can be best described as a “graceful dominant”. First, they designed the complex with consideration for the style and height of the surrounding micro-districts. Second, by introducing a pause in its tallest section, they created compositional tension – right along the urban planning axis of the area.

Object

Orion’s Belt

The Stone Khodynka 2 office complex, designed by Kleinewelt Architekten for the company Stone, is built with an ergonomic layout following “healthy building” principles: natural light, ventilation, and all the necessary features for an efficient office environment. On the outside, it resembles – like many contemporary buildings – an iPhone: sleek, glowing, glass-and-metal, edges elegantly rounded. Yet, it responds sensitively to the Khodynka context, where the main theme is the contrast between vertical and horizontal lines. The key intrigue lies in the design of the “stylobate” as a suspended passage, leaving the space beneath it open for free pedestrian movement.

Interview

Grigory Revzin: “It Was a Bold Statement Made on the Sly. Something Won”

In this article, we discuss the debates surrounding the circus competition and the demolition of the CMEA building with the most renowned architectural critic of our time. A paradox emerges in the process: while nostalgia for the Brezhnev era seems to be in vogue in Russia, a landmark building – the “axis” of the Warsaw Pact – has been sentenced to demolition. Isn’t that strange? We also find out that wow-architecture has made a comeback as a post-COVID trend. However, to make a truly powerful statement, professionals still remain indispensable.

Object

Exposed Concrete

One of the stages of improving a small square in the town of Lermontov was the construction of a skatepark. Entrusting this part of the project to the XSA team, the city gained a 250-meter trick track whose features resemble those of land art objects – unparalleled in Russia in both scale and design. Here’s a look at how the experimental snake run in the foothills of the Caucasus was built.

Object

One Step Closer To the Dream

The challenges of getting all the mandatory approvals, an insufficient budget, and construction site difficulties did not prevent ASADOV Bureau from achieving its main goal in the realization of the school project in the town of Troitsk – taking another step away from outdated notions of educational spaces toward creating a fundamentally new academic environment.

Object

Chalet on the Rock

An Accor hotel in Arkhyz, designed by A.Len, will be situated at the gateway to the resort’s main tourist hubs. The architects reinterpreted the widely popular chalet style while adding an unexpected twist – an unfinished structure preserved on the site. The design team transformed this remnant into an exciting space featuring an open-air pool and a restaurant with panoramic views of the region’s highest mountain ridges.

Interview

Sergey Skuratov: “By and large, the project has been realized in line with the original ideas”

In this issue, we talk to the chief architect of Garden Quarters, looking back at the history and key moments of a project that took 18 years to develop and has now finally been completed. What interests us most are the transformations that the project underwent during construction, and the way the “necessary void” of public space was formed, which turned this remarkable complex into a fragment of a whole new type of urban fabric – not just at the horizontal “street” level but in its vertical structure as well.

Object

A Unique Representative

The recently concluded year 2024 can be considered the year of completion for the “Garden Quarters” residential complex in Moscow’s Khamovniki. This project is well-known and, in many ways, iconic. Rarely does one manage to preserve such a number of original ideas, achieving in the end a kind of urban planning Gesamtkunstwerk. Here is a subjective view from an architecture journalist, with an interview with Sergey Skuratov soon to follow.

Object

Field of Life

The new project by the architectural company PNKB (an acronym for “Design, Research, and Advisory Bureau”), led by Sergey Gnedovsky and Anton Lyubimkin, for the Kulikovo Field Museum is dedicated to the field as a concept in its own right. The field has long been a focus of the museum’s thorough and successful research. Accordingly, the exterior of the new museum building is gentler than that of its predecessor, which was also designed by PNKB and dedicated specifically to the historic battle. Inside, however, the building confidently guides the visitor from a luminous atrium along a spiral path to the field – interpreted here as a field of life.

Object

A Paper Clip above the River

In this article, we talk with Vitaly Lutz from the Genplan Institute of Moscow about the design and unique features of the pedestrian bridge that now links the two banks of the Yauza River in the new cluster of Bauman Moscow State Technical University (MSTU). The bridge’s form and functionality – particularly the inclusion of an amphitheater suspended over the river – were conceived during the planning phase of the territory’s development. Typically, this approach is not standard practice, but the architects advocate for it, referring to this intermediate project phase as the “pre-AGR” stage (AGR stands for Architectural and Urban Planning Approval). Such a practice, they argue, helps define key parameters of future projects and bridge the gap between urban planning and architectural design.

Review

Living in the Architecture of One’s Own Making

Do architects design houses for themselves? You bet! In this article, we are examining a new book by TATLIN publishing house. This book – unprecedented for Russia – features 52 private homes designed and built by contemporary architects for themselves. It includes houses that are famous, even iconic, as well as lesser-known ones; large and small, stylish and eccentric. To some extent, the book reflects the history of Russian architecture over the past 30 years.

Object

A City Block Isoline

Another competition project for a residential complex on the banks of the Volga in Nizhny Novgorod has been prepared by Studio 44. A team of architects led by Ivan Kozhin concluded that using a regular block layout in such a location would be inappropriate and developed a “custom design” approach: a chain of parceled multi-section buildings stretching along the entire embankment. Let’s explore the features and advantages of this unconventional method.

Report

Competition: The Price of Creativity?

Any day now, we’re expecting the results of a competition held by the “Samolet” development group for a plot in Kommunarka. In the meantime, we share the impressions of Editor-in-Chief Julia Tarabarina, who managed to conduct a public talk. Though technically focused on the interaction between developers and architects, the public talk turned into a discussion about the pros and cons of architectural competitions.

Object

Terraced Design

The “River Park” residential complex has confidently and securely shaped the Nagatinsky Backwater shoreline. Featuring a public embankment, elevated courtyards connected by pedestrian bridges, and brick façades, the development invites exploration of its nuanced response to the surrounding context, as well as hints of the architects’ megalithic design thinking.

A Kremlin’s Core and Meteorite Fragments

We continue our coverage of the competition projects for the residential district that the development company GloraX plans to build along the embankment of the Rowing Channel in Nizhny Novgorod. ASADOV Architects approached the concept through a deep dive into local identity, using storytelling to pinpoint a central idea for the design: the master plan and composition are imagined as if a meteorite had struck a “proto-Kremlin”. Sounds weird? Find more details below!

Contest Results

The Volga Regatta

GloraX plans to develop a residential complex spanning 14 hectares along the Volga River in Nizhny Novgorod. The winning design in a closed-door competition, created by GORA Architects, features housing typologies ranging from townhouses to terraced high-rise slabs, a balance of functions, diverse ways of engaging with the water, and even a dedicated island (no less!) for the city residents.

Object

Life Plans

The master plan for the residential district “Prityazheniye” (“Gravity”) in Naberezhnye Chelny was developed by the architectural company A.Len, taking into account the specific urban planning context and partially implemented solutions of the first phase. However, the master plan prioritized its own values: a green framework, a system of focal points, a hierarchy of spaces, and pedestrian priority. After this, the question of what residents will do in their neighborhood simply doesn’t arise.

Object

A New Track

We took a thorough look at D_Station, a railcar repair depot dating back to 1906, recently reconstructed while preserving its century-old industrial structure, upon the project by Sergey Trukhanov and T+T Architects. Though work on the interiors – set to house restaurants and public spaces – is still underway, the building’s exterior already offers plenty to see. Visitors can explore the blend of old and new brickwork, appreciate the architect’s unique interpretation of ruin aesthetics, and enjoy the newly built pedestrian route that connects the Citydel Business Center’s arches to Kazakova Street.

Report

Four Different Surveys

The “Explore the City” competition, organized this year by the Genplan Institute of Moscow, stands out as a pretty unconventional one for the architectural field but aligns perfectly well with the character of urban planning work. The winning project analyzed contemporary residential complexes, combining urban planning insights with a realtor’s perspective to propose a hybrid approach. Other entries explored public centers, motivations for car ownership, and housing vacancy rates. A fifth participant withdrew. Here’s a closer look at the four completed works.

Report

Scheduled Evolution

ASADOV Architects unveiled the EvyCenter pavilion, a microcultural hub for fostering personal growth, organizing workshops, and doing gymnastics. Additionally, this pavilion serves as a prototype for a scalable country house, drawing inspiration from the “Loskutok” project, and constructed from CLT panels in a factory. This marks the beginning of a developer project initiated by the architectural firm (sic!), which is seeking partners to expand both small Evy settlements and even larger Evy cities, which are, according to Andrey Asadov, aimed at fostering the “evolutionary” development of the people who will inhabit them.

Object

The Golden Crown

The concept for a dental clinic in Yekaterinburg, developed by CNTR Studio, revolves around the idea of a “mouth full of gold”: pristine white porcelain stoneware walls are complemented by matte brass details. To avoid an overly literal interpretation, the architects focused on the building’s proportions, skillfully navigating between sunlight requirements and fire safety regulations.

News

Flexibility and Integration

Not long ago, we covered the project for the fourth phase of the ÁLIA residential complex, designed by APEX. Now, we’ve been shown different fence concepts they developed to enclose the complex’s private courtyards, incorporating a variety of public functions. We believe that the sheer fact that the complex’s architects were involved in such a detail as fencing speaks volumes.

Object

A Step Forward

The HIDE residential complex represents a major milestone for ADM architects and their leaders Andrey Romanov and Ekaterina Kuznetsova in their quest for a fresh high-rise aesthetic – one that is flexible and layered, capable of bringing vibrancy to mass and silhouette while shaping form. Over recent years, this approach has become ADM’s “signature style”, with the golden HIDE tower playing a pivotal role in its evolution. Here, we delve into the project’s story, explore the details of the complex’s design, and uncover its core essence.

Object

Gold in the Sands

A new office for a transcontinental company specializing in resource extraction and processing has opened in Dubai. Designed by T+T Architects, masters of creating spaces that are contemporary, diverse, flexible, and original, this project exemplifies their expertise. On the executive floor, a massive brass-clad partition dominates, while layered textures of compressed earth create a contextually resonant backdrop.

Object

Layers and Levels of Flight

This project goes way back – Reserve Union won this architectural competition at the end of 2011, and the building was completed in 2018, so it’s practically “archival”. However, despite being relatively unknown, the building can hardly be considered “dated” and remains a prime example of architectural expression, particularly in the headquarters genre. And it’s especially fitting for an aviation company office. In some ways, it resembles the Aeroflot headquarters at Sheremetyevo but with its own unique identity, following the signature style of Vladimir Plotkin. In this article, we take an in-depth look at the United Aircraft Corporation (UAC) headquarters in the Moscow agglomeration town of Zhukovsky, supplemented by recent photographs from Alexey Naroditsky – a shoot that became only recently possible due to the fact that improvements were finally made in the surrounding area.

Object

Light and Shadow

In this article, we delve into the architectural design of the “Chaika” house by DNK ag architects, which was recently completed in 2023 as part of the collection of signature designs at ZILArt. As is well-known, all the buildings in this complex follow a design code, yet each one is distinct. This particular building stands out not only for its whiteness and minimalism but also for the refined use of a limited number of techniques that, together, create what can confidently be called synergy.

View

Casus Novae

A master plan was developed for a large residential area with a name of “DNS City”, but now that its implementation began, the plan has been arbitrarily reformatted and replaced with something that, while similar on the surface, is actually quite different. This is not the first time such a thing happens, but it’s always frustrating. With permission from the author, we are sharing Maria Elkina’s post.