По-русски

MB-PROJECT: “Every new project is a challenge”

In this issue, we speak with Dmitry and Oleg Shurygin, founders of the company MV-PROJECT, which has extensive experience in designing theater and entertainment buildings as well as working with cultural heritage sites.

22 December 2025
Interview
mainImg
MB-PROJECT is one of the country’s leading developers of theater-type projects and restorations of cultural heritage sites. Their portfolio includes dozens of completed projects and many professional awards. Today, the founders of the company are actively involved in the development of industry regulatory documents: their accumulated experience and qualifications make their expert opinions valuable for the entire professional community.

We spoke with MB-PROJECT partners Dmitry and Oleg Shurygin – who, despite having the same last name, are not related – about the history of the company, its specialization, and the advantages and challenges of working with commercial and public clients. This coincidence of the founders’ surnames has more than once led to awkward situations, but it has never prevented the partners from maintaining a friendly relationship and running a joint business, complementing each other harmoniously.

Dmitry Shurygin and Oleg Shurygin, partners of MB PROJECT
Copyright: © MB-project


Archi.ru:
How did you guys meet?

Dmitry Shurygin: We studied together at the Architecture Department of the State University of Land Use Planning. Because we had the same last name, we were constantly getting into various situations together, which brought us closer. However, we studied well and both graduated with honors.

Oleg Shurygin: Studying came easily, and with every year my interest in architecture only grew. For me – I came to Moscow from Kolomna and lived in the university dormitory – the university life was especially fascinating. Over those six years a firm feeling formed that we had chosen the right profession.

But the idea to create a joint company came later?

D.Sh.: Yes, much later. While still students, Oleg and I started working in different organizations. In 2002 I joined the Central Research and Design Institute for Residential and Public Buildings, and started working in the studio of Valentin Stepanov, Russia’s leading designer of school buildings. Under his guidance I took part in several projects and even got involved in work on new regulatory documents for the design of educational institutions (MGSN 4.06-03 of 2004 and its guidelines). It turned out at that point that systematization was also interesting to me. Later this experience with regulatory work proved very useful when working on theater projects.

O.Sh.: I was one of the first in our student group to start working. In my second year at the State University of Land Use Planning, I was hired by Bergen Nachtigall, the office of Konstantin Vernigor, which at the time was among the leading firms in private architecture. It was a true school of design, project development and construction for me, a school of teamwork and client relations. Two years later, I was already heading a division with my own area of responsibility and projects. By the time I graduated, I had founded my own company, but after working another two years I realized the world of interior and private design felt too narrow, and I wanted larger-scale tasks and projects.

D.Sh.: At first I worked on the round Odintsovo school project at Central Research and Design Institute for Residential and Public Buildings. Then I gradually began to join other projects – schools, preschools, and higher-education facilities. One day I was invited to join the major-renovation project for the Gogol Theater, which happened to be right across the street from my university. I examined the building from top to bottom, immersed myself in theater technology, watched all the productions, and even analyzed the layout of the premises for compliance with current regulations. The document I prepared was used in the project and later became the basis for the technical brief for the theater’s reconstruction. Unfortunately, that project was never implemented, but the client liked the result, and in 2007 I was offered the development of projects for another nine theaters. I realized this was something that truly interested me and invited Oleg to join this large-scale effort. After just a few meetings with the client, we decided it was time to start our own company. We registered the legal entity in September, and that same winter began work – first on three, and then on another six theater projects – in our own studio with a team of ten.

  • zooming
    Odintsovo school-gymnasium for 1,080 students with an extension for a pool block (Moscow region, Odintsovo, microdistrict 5–5a, Marshal Krylov Boulevard, 20)
    Copyright: © MB-project


O.Sh.: These were not projects for new buildings but rather for upgrading existing theaters. Formally, they were classified as major renovations, but in reality it was reconstruction within the existing structural shell. In the mid-2000s the distinctions between types of work were not strictly codified, so we ourselves had to find the balance between preservation and change.

At first, theater management viewed us with a fair amount of wariness – we were still young architects without an impressive portfolio of completed projects. We overcame the skepticism through our work: we improved layouts to make them more convenient for staff and audiences, and proposed striking design solutions. It was an intense and productive period – we had to very quickly master the theater sector and the specifics of working with public clients.

  • zooming
    1 / 5
  • zooming
    2 / 5
    “School of Contemporary Play” Theater on Trubnaya
  • zooming
    3 / 5
    “School of Contemporary Play” Theater on Trubnaya
  • zooming
    4 / 5
    Kuklachev Cat Theater
    Copyright: © MB-project
  • zooming
    5 / 5
    Moscow Children′s Book Theater “Magic Lamp”


Speaking of public clients – at that time many offices were being created with a focus on private or commercial clients, whereas you immediately started working with public-sector projects. How difficult was it to build your practice in this field?

O.Sh.: Tender procedures developed in parallel with the growth of our company, so we had the opportunity to understand all of the subtleties. With each completed contract, we increased our own professional standing and could assess our work more confidently. Gradually, we figured out how the tender system actually worked, how to prepare the documentation, and we gradually began to act as the general designer on major state contracts.

D.Sh.: Now, thanks to our experience with government contracts, our bid has a significant advantage over competitors. However, every type of client has its pros and cons. The plus of public contracts is stable funding; the minus is the absence of advance payments and the fact that payment is made only after the work is fully completed. Because of the issue of unstable cash flow, we decided not to limit ourselves to public contracts and increased the share of commercial projects in our portfolio. We now successfully work with such high-profile developers as Sminex, A101, MR Group, and others.

O.Sh.: The drawback of developer projects is the long process of formalizing contracts, which often runs in parallel with the work already underway. The advantage is a flexible system of milestone payments throughout the year. A mixed portfolio of contracts allows the company to manage both financial and professional tasks much more smoothly.

  • zooming
    1 / 6
    Satz Children Music Theater
  • zooming
    2 / 6
    Copyright: © MB-project
  • zooming
    3 / 6
  • zooming
    4 / 6
  • zooming
    5 / 6
  • zooming
    6 / 6
    A reconstruction ptoject. Longitudinal section. Satz Children Music Theater
    Copyright: © MB-project


So you didn’t limit yourselves to a single building type or a single type of client?

D.Sh.: We started with theater projects, but soon began designing schools as well – I know that typology very well. We also worked on other projects: exhibition halls, museums, and libraries.

From 2010 onward, we began working with cultural heritage properties. For us, this was a natural development, since many theater buildings hold protected heritage status.

O.Sh.: It so happened that while we were working on the major renovation project for the theater on Malaya Bronnaya, the building was granted protected heritage status. We had to make a lot of adjustments on the fly – we obtained a license from the Ministry of Culture and then reworked the entire project documentation to meet the requirements of the Moscow Department of Cultural Heritage. It wasn’t easy, but we handled it, and after that we began working systematically with architectural heritage sites.

D.Sh.: Since then, we’ve completed dozens of projects for listed buildings. We’ve learned to find the most delicate and flexible solutions that make it possible to restore heritage assets while giving them new life.

  • zooming
    1 / 5
    Restoration of the Cosmos Pavilion at VDNKh
  • zooming
    2 / 5
    Restoration of the Cosmos Pavilion at VDNKh
  • zooming
    3 / 5
    Restoration of the Cosmos Pavilion at VDNKh
    Copyright: © MB-project
  • zooming
    4 / 5
    Restoration of the Cosmos Pavilion at VDNKh. Longitudinal section
    Copyright: © MB-project
  • zooming
    5 / 5
    Restoration of the Cosmos Pavilion at VDNKh. Crosswise section
    Copyright: © MB-project


O.Sh.: Our task is to find the fine line between meticulous restoration, reconstruction, and adaptation – with the integration of modern engineering and safety systems. That line is very thin, but it is always there. You need experience, a trained eye, and enormous respect for heritage to find – sometimes – the only possible correct solution.

D.Sh.: A building must live and function, it’s a living being. Otherwise, even after the most careful restoration, it will deteriorate and fall into decay. That’s why in every restoration project we solve two key problems: the restoration itself, and the adaptation of the building for contemporary use. In most cases, the second task is the more difficult one. Sometimes it looks almost impossible. For example, how do you organize evacuation routes, or make a building accessible for people with limited mobility, or run ventilation through historic structures? And if you add theater technology on top of that, you can understand just how complex a puzzle we have to solve each time we work with a historic building.

  • zooming
    1 / 7
  • zooming
    2 / 7
    Reconstruction of the Bobrinsky House
    Copyright: © MB-project
  • zooming
    3 / 7
    Reconstruction of the Bobrinsky House
  • zooming
    4 / 7
    Reconstruction of the Bobrinsky House
  • zooming
    5 / 7
    Reconstruction of the Bobrinsky House. The main building. facade in axes 3-8
    Copyright: © MB-project
  • zooming
    6 / 7
    Reconstruction of the Bobrinsky House. Plan of the 1st floor
    Copyright: © MB-project
  • zooming
    7 / 7
    Reconstruction of the Bobrinsky House. Section 2-2. The main building
    Copyright: © MB-project


So, you now have a dual specialization: theaters and heritage?

D.Sh.: At a certain point, theaters began to move into the background, but about 7 or 8 years ago Oleg and I asked ourselves what we were really most interested in doing – and it turned out to be theaters and cultural heritage sites. After that decision, everything gradually changed over the course of two or three years: we once again began designing theaters, joined the team of authors working on the national code of practice for theater buildings (Code of Practice 309.1325800.2017 “Theater and performance buildings. Design standards”), began giving lectures at MARHI on theater design, and taking part in various forums and exhibitions.

Our real strength is our expertise in designing dozens of very different theaters – including such unusual ones as Kuklachev’s Cat Theatre or a Shadow Theatre. An understanding of theater technology, on the one hand, requires strict adherence to certain conditions, but on the other hand it opens up virtually boundless possibilities for innovative solutions.

O.Sh.: Designing a theater is always an experiment. The constraints of the site or the specifics of the existing building, the director’s creative method, technical and regulatory requirements, auditorium capacity, acoustics, sightlines, interior design – all of this layers together and produces a result that often has very little to do with the original brief.

  • zooming
    1 / 5
  • zooming
    2 / 5
  • zooming
    3 / 5
    Copyright: © MB-project
  • zooming
    4 / 5
  • zooming
    5 / 5
    Sevastopol Academic Dance Theater named after V.A. Elizarov. Section 2-2
    Copyright: © MB-project


D.Sh.: The process of designing a theater is like overlaying tracing paper sheets, each one representing a specific set of requirements. We keep aligning all these “layers” until the optimal image of the future building begins to emerge.

O.Sh.: Every time we discover something new – and that’s what makes our work so inspiring. Every new project is a challenge.

  • zooming
    1 / 6
  • zooming
    2 / 6
  • zooming
    3 / 6
  • zooming
    4 / 6
    Copyright: © MB-project
  • zooming
    5 / 6
    Copyright: © MB-project
  • zooming
    6 / 6


D.Sh.: The complexity of theater buildings conceals huge potential for optimization. If you simply add up the areas of all the necessary rooms, you will end up getting enormous construction costs – but in practice there is almost always the opportunity to reduce them, sometimes even by half, through multifunctionality or rational use of space. That’s what we did back in Sevastopol: we were able to reduce the total area of the Yelizarev Dance Theater building from 20,000 to 10,000 square meters. And that means a substantial saving not only in construction costs, but also in the building’s future operation.

  • zooming
    1 / 4
  • zooming
    2 / 4
  • zooming
    3 / 4
  • zooming
    4 / 4


We rarely take on someone else’s concept design. If we are invited to join a project, it is usually the exception rather than the rule. It requires some extraordinary circumstances: a landmark client or a high-profile architect. Normally, we develop the architectural concepts ourselves. And within our team this work is done collectively. When a request comes in, we determine who will oversee the project and which of our in-house architectural studios will take it on. We decide this among ourselves based on workload and project specifics – I usually handle new construction, while Oleg focuses on restoration and reconstruction. Another important factor is who has developed the closer, more trusting relationship with the client: we don’t see clients as customers, but as partners in the realization of a project. From that point on, project management and responsibility rest entirely with the supervising partner. Of course, we are both aware of all ongoing projects; together with our department heads we discuss them at meetings and search for solutions together – but making the final decisions always remains with the project supervisor.

O.Sh.: Sometimes we organize an in-company competition and invite several studios at once to prepare proposals, which we then analyze together and select the best solutions. We like to maintain a lively, creative atmosphere in the team, because there isn’t as much pure creativity in our profession as we would like. Only occasional flashes against the background of long and difficult project work.

MB-PROJECT carries out comprehensive design: including expert reviews, working documentation, and on-site supervision. Our employees are deeply immersed in the process, and it’s useful for them to switch gears now and then, listen to the “muse”, and argue among themselves.

D.Sh.: An interesting experience emerges when two different teams are brought into the same project. For example, on complex cultural heritage sites we involve two architectural groups: one specializing in restoration, and the other in new construction and reconstruction, and we suggest that they work together. This way they exchange competencies: the restorers begin to better understand the general construction regulatory framework, and the architects learn to value authenticity.

  • zooming
    1 / 8
  • zooming
    2 / 8
    Siberian State University of Music and Theatre Arts in Kemerovo. Section
    Copyright: © MB-project
  • zooming
    3 / 8
  • zooming
    4 / 8
  • zooming
    5 / 8
  • zooming
    6 / 8
    Siberian State University of Music and Theatre Arts in Kemerovo. Longitudinal section
    Copyright: © MB-project
  • zooming
    7 / 8
    Siberian State University of Music and Theatre Arts in Kemerovo. Plan of the 1st floor
    Copyright: © MB-project
  • zooming
    8 / 8
    Siberian State University of Music and Theatre Arts in Kemerovo. Plan of the 3rd floor
    Copyright: © MB-project


And how many departments are there in your company overall? How many employees do you have?

D.Sh.: A little over 70 specialists. Right now we’re in a phase of growth and continue to expand. Over the past two years we’ve increased our staff by 20–30 people. At the moment we have three architectural studios and two architectural-restoration studios, a structural engineering bureau, and a small engineering department. We act as general designers, and we have a large number of chief project engineers who perform project management functions.

O.Sh.: We have our own theater technology department. This is an extremely rare thing for an architectural office. Usually, specialists in theater equipment work for the companies that supply this equipment. As a specialized design organization, we have brought together highly qualified experts in this field, which allows us to combine equipment from different manufacturers within a single project and achieve the highest-quality solutions for equipping auditoriums – thus meeting the very highest demands of theater directors and their teams.



These days everyone complains that it’s hard to hire competent architects, but apparently putting together two teams of restorers is even more difficult. How do you manage to pull a stunt like that?

D.Sh.: You’re right. Unfortunately, the field of restoration is not in the best shape at the moment. Long-standing design institutes are closing. There are problems in educational institutions. However, two years ago we managed to assemble a professional team of restorers. Previously we had several specialists on staff and additionally engaged outside companies as subcontractors. Last year we were able to open a second specialized architectural-restoration studio.

You opened a branch in St. Petersburg. Why did you need another physical office?

D.Sh.: In St. Petersburg we are working on a huge project that includes 62 buildings that form part of the Botanical Garden ensemble. It is a unique complex with greenhouses, research buildings, and a museum. To coordinate the work of the design teams in Moscow and St. Petersburg, we needed an office and a design group in the nation’s Northern Capital.

O.Sh.: As it turned out, there are very few specialists in Russia who understand how greenhouses are designed and built. So we had to immerse ourselves deeply in this area as well. There are multiple nuances and complexities: glazing, ventilation, condensate drainage… the list could go on and on. But it is a very interesting field of design, with many “hidden reefs” and complex professional challenges.

D.Sh.: Working on unique projects attracts highly qualified specialists to our team – people with whom it is a pleasure to work on complex projects. Together we create an excellent, positive atmosphere in the office, which we value greatly. We believe that only in such conditions can good architecture be created!



22 December 2025

Headlines now
A Glazed Figurine
In searching for an image for a residential building near the Novodevichy Convent, GAFA architects turned to their own perception of the place: it evoked associations with antiquity, plein-air painting, and vintage artifacts. The two towers will be entirely clad in volumetric glazed ceramic – at present, there are no other buildings like this in Russia. The complex will also stand out thanks to its metabolic bay-window cells, streamlined surfaces, a ceremonial “hotel-style” driveway, and a lobby overlooking a lush garden.
A Knight’s Move via the Cour d’Honneur
Intercolumnium Architects presented to the City Planning Council a residential complex project that is set to replace the Aquatoria business center on Vyborgskaya Embankment. Experts praised the overall quality of the work, but expressed reservations about the three cour d’honneurs and suggested softening the contrast between the facades facing the embankment and the Kantemirovsky Bridge.
A Small Country
Mezonproekt is developing a long-term master plan for the MEPhI campus in Obninsk. Over the next ten years, an enclave territory of about 100 hectares, located in a forest on the northern edge of the city, is set to transform into a modern center for the development of the nuclear energy sector. The plan envisions attracting international students and specialists, as well as comprehensive territorial development: both through the contemporary realization of “frozen” plans from the 1980s and through the introduction of new trends – public spaces, an aquapark, a food court, a school, and even a nuclear medicine center. Public and sports facilities are intended to be accessible to city residents as well, and the campus is to be physically and functionally connected to Obninsk.
Pearl Divers
GAFA has designed an apartment complex for Derbent intended to switch people from a work mode to a resort mindset – and to give the surrounding area a much-needed jolt. The building offers two distinct faces: restrained and laconic on the city side, and a lushly ornate façade facing the sea. At the heart of the complex, a hidden pearl lies – an open-air pool with an arch, offering views of a starry sky, and providing direct access to the beach.
A Satellite Island
The Genplan Institute of Moscow has prepared a master plan for the development of the Sarpinsky and Golodny island system, located within the administrative boundaries of Volgograd and considered among the largest river islands in Russia. By 2045, the plan envisions the implementation of 15 large-scale investment projects, including sports and educational clusters, a congress center with a “Volgonarium”, a film production cluster, and twenty-one theme parks. We explain which engineering, environmental, and transportation challenges must be addressed to turn this vision into reality. The master plan solutions have already been approved and incorporated into the city’s general development plan.
The Amber Gate
The Amber City residential complex is one of the redevelopment projects in the former industrial area located beyond Moscow’s Third Ring Road near Begovaya metro station. Alexey Ilyin’s studio proposed an original master plan that transformed two clusters of towers into ceremonial propylaea, gave the complex a recognizable silhouette, and established visual connections with new high-rise developments on both right and left – thus integrating it into the scale of the growing metropolis. It is also marked by its own futuristic stylistic language, based on a reinterpreted streamline aesthetic.
A Theater Triangle
The architectural company “Chetvertoe Izmerenie” (“Fourth Dimension”) has developed the design for a new stage of the Magnitogorsk Musical Theater, rethinking not only theater architecture but also the role of the theater in the contemporary city.
Aleksei Ilyin: “I approach every task with genuine interest”
Aleksei Ilyin has been working on major urban projects for more than 30 years. He has all the necessary skills for high-rise construction in Moscow – yet he believes it’s essential to maintain variety in the typologies and scales represented in his portfolio. He is passionate about drawing – but only from life, and also in the process of working on a project. We talk about the structure and optimal size of an office, about his past and current projects, large and small tasks, and about creative priorities.
​A Golden Sunbeam
A compact brick-and-metal building in the growing Shukhov Park in Vyksa seems to absorb sunlight, transform it into yellow accents inside, and in the evening “give it back” as a warm golden glow streaming from its windows. It is, frankly, a very attractive building: both material and lightweight at the same time, with lightness inside and materiality outside. Its form is shaped by function – laconic, yet far from simple. Let’s take a closer look.
Architecton Awards
In 2025, the jury of the Architecton festival reviewed the finalist projects through live, open presentations held right in the exhibition hall – a rather engaging performance, and something rarely seen among Russian awards. It would be great if “Zodchestvo” adopted this format. Below, we present all the winning projects, including four special nominations.
Garden of Knowledge
UNK architects and UNK design created the interiors of the Letovo Junior campus, working together with NF Studio, which was responsible for developing the educational technology that takes into account the needs and perception of younger and middle school children.
The Silver Skates
The STONE Kaluzhskaya office quarter is accompanied by two residential towers, making the complex – for it is indeed a single ensemble – well balanced in functional terms. The architects at Kleinewelt gave the residential buildings a silvery finish to match the office blocks. How they are similar, how they differ, and what “Silver Skates” has to do with it – we explore in this article.
On the Dynastic Trail
The houses and townhouses of the “Tsarskaya Tropа” (“Czar’s Trail”) complex are being built in the village of Gaspra in Crimea – to the west and east of the palaces of the former grand-ducal residence “Ai-Todor”. One of the main challenges for the architects at KPLN, who developed the project, was to respond appropriately to this significant neighboring heritage. How this influenced the massing, the façades, and the way the authors work with the terrain is explored in our article.
A New Path
The main feature of the Yar Park project, designed by Sergey Skuratov for Kazan, is that it is organized along the “spine” of a multifunctional mall with an impressive multi-height atrium space in its middle. The entire site, both on the city side and the Kazanka River embankment, is open to the public. The complex is intended not to become “yet another fenced enclave” but, as urban planners say, a “polycenter” – a new point of attraction for the whole of Kazan, especially its northern part, made up of residential districts that until now have lacked such a vibrant public space. It represents a new urban planning approach to a high-density mixed-use development situated in the city center – in a sense, an “anti-quarter”. Even Moscow, one might say, doesn’t yet have anything quite like it. Well, lucky Kazan!
Beneath the Azure Sky
A depository designed by Studio 44 will soon be built in Kenozersky National Park to preserve and display the so-called “heavens” – ceiling structures characteristic of wooden churches in the Russian North, painted with biblical scenes. For each of these “heavens”, the architects created a volume corresponding in scale and dimensions to the original church interior. The result is a honeycomb-like composition, with modules derived directly from the historic monuments themselves, allowing visitors to view the icons from the historically accurate angle – from below, looking upward. How exactly this works is the subject of our story.
​The Power of Lines
The building at the very beginning of New Arbat is the result of long deliberations over how to replace the former House of Communication. Contemporary, dynamic, and even somewhat zoomorphic in character, it is structured around a large diagonal grid. The building has become a striking accent both in the perspective of the former Kalinin Avenue and in the panorama of Arbat Square. Yet, unfortunately, the original concept was not fully realized. In 2020, the Moscow ArchCouncil approved a design featuring an exoskeleton – an external load-bearing structure, which eventually turned into a purely decorative element. Still, the power of the supergraphic “holds” the building, giving it the qualities of a new urban landmark with iconic potential. How this concept took shape, what unexpected associations might underlie the grid’s form, and why the exoskeleton was never built – all this is explored in our article.
Resort on the Kama River
Wowhaus has developed a project for the reconstruction of Korabelnaya Roshcha (“Mast Grove”), a wellness resort located on the banks of the Kama River.
Nests in Primorye
The eco-park project “Nests”, designed by Aleksey Polishchuk and the company Power Technologies, received first prize at the Eco-Coast 2025 festival, organized by the Union of Architects of Russia. For a glamping site in Filinskaya Bay, the authors proposed bird-shaped houses, treehouses, and a nest-shaped observation platform, topping it all with an entrance pavilion executed in the shape of an owl.
The Angle of String Tension
The House of Music, designed by Vladimir Plotkin and the architects of TPO Reserve, resembles a harp, and when seen from above, even a bass clef. But if only it were that simple! The architecture of the complex fuses two distinct expressive languages: the lattice-like, transparent, permeable vocabulary of “classical” modernism and the sculptural, ribbon-like volumes so beloved by today’s neo-modernism. How it all works – where the catharsis lies, which compositional axes underpin the design, where the project resembles Zaryadye Concert Hall and where it does not – read in the article below.
How Historic Tobolsk Becomes a Portal to the Future
Over the past decade, the architectural company Wowhaus has developed urban strategies for several Russian cities – Vyksa, Tula, and Nizhnekamsk, to name but a few. Against this backdrop, the Tobolsk master plan stands out both for its scale – the territory under transformation covers more than 220 square kilometers – and for its complexity.
St. Petersburg vs Rome
The center of St. Petersburg is, as we know, sacred – but few people can say with certainty where this “sacred place” actually begins and ends. It’s not about the formal boundaries, “from the Obvodny Canal to the Bolshaya Nevka”, but about the vibe that feels true to the city center. With the Nevskaya Ratusha complex – built to a design that won an international competition – Evgeny Gerasimov and Sergei Tchoban created an “image of the center” within its territory. And not so much the image of St. Petersburg itself, as that of a global metropolis. This is something new, something that hasn’t appeared in the city for a long time. In this article, we study the atmosphere, recall precedents, and even reflect on who and when first called St. Petersburg the “new Rome”. Clearly, the idea is alive for a reason.
On the Wave
The project of transforming the river port and embankment in the city of Cheboksary, developed by the ATRIUM Architects, involves one of the city’s key areas. The Volga embankment is to be turned into a riverside boulevard – a multifunctional, comfortable, and expressive space for work and leisure activities. The authors propose creating a new link with the city’s main Krasnaya (“Red”) Square, as well as erecting several residential towers inspired by the shape of the traditional national women’s headdress – these towers are likely to become striking accents on the Volga panorama.
Valery Kanyashin: “We Were Given a Free Hand”
The Headliner residential complex, the main part of which was recently completed just across from Moscow City, is a kind of neighbor to the MIBC that doesn’t “play along” with it. On the contrary, the new complex is entirely built on contrast: like a city of differently scaled buildings that seems to have emerged naturally over the past 20 years – which is a hugely popular trend nowadays! And yet here – perhaps only here – such a project has been realized to its full potential. Yes, high-rises dominate, but all these slender, delicate profiles, all these exciting perspectives! And most importantly – how everything is mixed and composed together... We spoke with the project’s leader Valery Kanyashin.
​The Keystone
Until quite recently, premium residential and office complexes in Moscow were seen as the exclusive privilege of the city center. Today the situation is changing: high-quality architecture is moving beyond the confines of the Third Ring Road and appearing on the outskirts. The STONE Kaluzhskaya business center is one such example. Projects like this help decentralize the megalopolis, making life and work prestigious in any part of the city.
Perpetuum Mobile
The interior of the headquarters of Natsproektstroy, created by the IND studio team, vividly and effectively reflects the client’s field of activity – it is one of Russia’s largest infrastructure companies, responsible for logistics and transport communications of every kind you can possibly think of.
Water and Light
Church art is full of symbolism, and part of it is truly canonical, while another part is shaped by tradition and is perceived by some as obligatory. Because of this kind of “false conservatism”, contemporary church architecture develops slowly compared to other genres, and rarely looks contemporary. Nevertheless, there are enthusiasts in this field out there: the cemetery church of Archangel Michael in Apatity, designed by Dmitry Ostroumov and Prokhram bureau, combines tradition and experiment. This is not an experiment for its own sake, however – rather, the considered work of a contemporary architect with the symbolism of space, volume, and, above all, light.
Champions’ Cup
At first glance, the Bell skyscraper on 1st Yamskogo Polya Street, 12, appears strict and laconic – though by no means modest. Its economical stereometry is built on a form close to an oval, one of UNK architects’ favorite themes. The streamlined surface of the main volume, clad in metal louvers, is sliced twice with glass incisions that graphically reveal the essence of the original shape: both its simplicity and its complexity. At the same time, dozens of highly complex engineering puzzles have been solved here.
Semi-Digital Environment
In the town of Innopolis, a satellite of Kazan, the first 4-star hotel designed by MAD Architects has opened. The interiors of the hotel combine elegance with irony, and technology with comfort, evoking the atmosphere of a computer game or maybe a sci-fi movie about the near future.