The Genius of an Important Place

The architects of “Ostozhenka” Bureau examined the Volkhonka areas and proposed not only a number of ideas making the history of this place more visible but also some new approaches to working with historical centers of Russian cities.

Written by:
Anna Starostina, Julia Tarabarina
Translated by:
Anton Mizonov

30 December 2014

Object

“Ostozhenka” Bureau made an architectural and town-planning investigation of Volkhonka areas in the early 2014. This examination had been ordered by “White City Project” Company as a part of a greater project created by the efforts of both Russian and international specialists and included into the book called “Culture Territory: Volkhonka Quarters”. The object of the project was to develop ideas for forming a so-called “museum quarter” – a city area uniting central Moscow museums, namely the Pushkin Museum of Fine Arts and Museum of Architecture.

In the context of the project a Danish studio of Jan Gehl estimated the condition of the common areas of the district, Italians from Mobility in Chain analyzed the traffic situation, professor Gabriele Filippini gave his advice on the landscape design and “Philips” company examined the lighting of the district. “Ostozhenka” was invited a bit later, so the architects had a chance to base their work on the results of their colleagues. However, their own considerable experience in working on the town-planning concept of the neighboring Ostozhenka district was also a great help to the architects.

“Once, many years ago, we studied the destiny of Ostozhenka district very closely, - says Alexander Skokan, - for a long while, practically during the whole 20th century, it had not been built up because there was supposed to be an avenue leading to the Palace of the Soviets. Volkhonka, as well as Ostozhenka, had got caught up in the “big construction” sphere: first of a chapel, then a castle, then a chapel again. So eminently, Ostozhenka became one wing of the center and Volkhonka – the other. For us, these territories form an interrelated group: one being the logical continuation of the other.”

zooming — Exhibition in the Museum of Architecture, May 2014. Volkhonka Quarters - Culture Territory - Volkhonka Archive. Architectural and town-planning survey © "Ostozhenka" Bureau

In the course of the survey that preceded the development of design offers as such, the main problems of the district became evident. First of all, this central area having a huge potential (with most important cultural and public sites in its assets) is underrated and not attractive enough either for Muscovites or for the tourists. For one, it turned out that the town-planning module of the whole district – a system of allotments (?) – is still there and one can clearly feel the charm of old Moscow inside the quarters. But the “field search” – a detailed walk-round check of the district with a GPS-tracker – showed bad permeability of this area: if a rare stroller wanders into a backstreet he would have to make his way out the same way, circuiting in tangled loops, well seen on the trackers. Most of the yards are inaccessible and the moving around is only possible on the main “arteries”. Secondly, the plans of the great “might-have-been” constructions disturb the integrity of the historical outline of the city – a part of the red lines are missing out, there are gaps – so wide that sometimes it is not even clear where is the entry and where is the exit of this part of the city. And finally, Volkhonka has become a widely used motor track. It cuts the district into parts, and on the whole the streets are given away to cars – there are few crosswalks and it is inconvenient for the pedestrians.

While working on the first of these problems – the bad permeability of the inner spaces of the district – the architects counted up all potentially walk-available allotments and gardens – there were 21 of them, so the authors suggested making new pedestrian connections between them. They came up with two options: with 14 added connections in one and 15 in the other. At that, according to the graph theory that the architects applied to the rout analysis, adding only one supplementary connection – between the yard of Golitsyn estate and the center, between Bolshoi and Maly Znamenskiy Pereulok – significantly raises all coefficients in one time and consequently makes walks much more diverse and the district itself – permeable and open, just as a museum quarter is supposed to be.

The net of yards and parks lies in-between the main walking route, along the streets, that has also become more entertaining stretching from the exit of “Kropotkinskaya” metro station along the left side of Volkhonka, past the Pushkin Museum of Fine Arts to Starovagankovskiy lane, reaching this way the Museum of Architecture. The architects consider Prechistenskiye Vorota square and the fragment of Volkhonka from the metro station to Pushkin Museum to be the core of the route, a sort of gate leading into the museum quarter.

In order to visually complete the space of the square, and to bring back to it the scope that was lost after a two-storey house in front of the red houses on the spit between Prechistenskaya and Ostozhenka had been pulled down in 1972, the architects propose to fill the place of the demolished building with a light roof-pavilion on thin columns with a number of cafes, flower shops and a roofed path from the metro to Ostozhenka (in early 90s Ostozhenka was designing as part of refreshment a shopping mall of approximately the same size as the pavilion on this same place). The Engels monument that is now standing alone amid an empty park stays in the round cutaway of the bridgings, like a lone tree. The exit of “Volkhonka” metro station of Kalininskaya (yellow) line – being recently in construction – could be placed under the roof of the pavilion.

The climax of the walking route is the boulevard paved along the side-walk of the left part of Volkhonka towards Pushkin Museum. It follows the contours of “Kropotkinskaya” station vestibule – under the ground, about 16 feet below. The station had been known as “Palace of the Soviets” and had even been considered as its grand entrance: one of the station exits was to lead right into the chapel of the victorious proletariat. The pattern of the paving reflects the contours of the five-pointed stars carried by the columns of the station; and in the middle of every pentagon there is a light post that extends the columns under ground. This way the station springs up proving itself overground. At the eastern end it literally opens up with a new antrance in shape of an oval pedestal facing the Private Collection Museum. The drafts show that sunlight could reach the underground vestibule – so close it is to the surface.

The metro station, the festive arch-pavilion built by Samuel Quarz in 1935, the fragment of the substruction of the Palace if Soviets preserved under the ground as a part of showrooms of the new chapel and the park around the gas-station of the kremlin garage – the architects managed to unite all these memories of the great soviet plans into one piece calling the boulevard slightly ironically “The Shining Path” and so giving among others plenty of hints to the future guides. And some food for thought to the strollers.

The new exit of the eastern end of “Kropotkinskaya” station faces the collection museum – and the authors build in its glass prism into the yard of the museum. A new building of Pushkin Museum will arise at the corner of Volkhonka and Maliy Znamenskiy: its architecture – fairly modern, but its volume repeats the scale of the demolished building and re-establishes the red line of Volkhonka. A line of garden pergolas stretches along the historical red line, from the new museum building towards the Boulevard Ring, diagonally splitting “The Shining Path”. It marks the scope of the old vanished buildings reminding about the overlap of different epochs, two at the very least: the soviet and old-estate ones (that is why “pergolas”) but in fact of course not two but many more. All together it forms a bit dramatized installation of the city transformation memory, reminding wing-flats: “The Palace of Soviets vestibule” meets the vanished line of an old street continued by a fragment of a cobbled street amid the traffic flows in the middle of the square and then – Engels whose figure is built into the contours of the house demolished forty years ago in order to erect the monument. This is the main plot of the project – the enumeration, the overlap, drawing the historical meanings, markers and reminders out of the place.

The architects proposed to restore the volume of the pre-soviet development in two other places: on Prechistenskaya quay behind Glazunov’s Gallery and in the park at the beginning of Volkhonka – also cleared before Nixon’s visit. The authors are calculating the town-planning potential for both cases and it turns out not very big: 2 acres in the first case and 1 in the other since it is only about regeneration – reconstruction of the gaps of the city canvas. All the calculations are merely hypothetical and do not go beyond recommendations for correcting the regulations that now prohibits any construction.

In addition to the traffic situation study executed by the specialists of the Italian bureau MIC, who in terms of electronic calculations suggested to narrow the track way of Volkhonka fitting it with a traffic strip – all this without reducing its carrying capacity – the architects proposed some possible places for the additional parking lots for cars and sightseeing buses and have developed a more convenient crosswalk scheme on Prechistenskikh Vorot square – the center that together with the “cobble-museum” becomes a little pedestrian island.

Besides the architectural inclusions and town-planning enquiries the book presenting Ostozhenka’s work is supplied with some additional sections. One of them is called “Archive Volkhonka” – it contains information about the history of the district that the architects based on during their work and also some additional facts that the authors found interesting. “What makes Volkhonka unique is that practically all the major stylistic and architectural conceptions have left their imprint here” – say the authors of the project, paying attention not only to the well-known things but to the forgotten details. There appears to be plenty of interesting facts here. For example, not everybody knows that Ivan Nikolayev’s commune-house was built on vaulted basements of the Rzhevskaya Virgin church that now hold a restaurant. The narrow, slip-like windows of the archives of Natural Science Library are practical because they follow the rhythm of the bookshelves arrangement inside. Cour d’honneur of the wooden palace of Catherine II built by architect Kazakov was like his later projects of Kremlin Palace and all together – it reminded a roman forum. And the competition for Lenin Museum, that a lot of celebrities took part in, such as Leonid Pavlov and Boris Mezentsev, allowed to sharpen the monumental ideas for the subsequent museums of the revolution leader, namely for the famous museum in Gorki. The museum was planned to be built on the right from Pushkin Museum behind Antipiy’s Church and completely demolishing the whole quarter up to Znamenka.

One more enclosure – a short history of Moscow urbanism with Alexey Gutnov as head of Advanced Research Department of Research and Project Institute of General Planning, Andrey Bokov and Alexander Skokan standing at its origins in the 60s. In the 70s Andrey Bokov and Alexander Skokan worked on the projects devoted to the city development and creating walking routes – all that the Moscow authorities and architects are so actively refining themselves today with. They differed from modern urbanism: at that time not so much attention was paid to the traffic problems as to preservation and regeneration, to the half-forgotten history of Moscow. They also paid attention to the permeability of the urban territories, pedestrian paths that in those socialist times were fairly abundant – you could pass all the yards through – it was a sort of an amusement to find the shortest way or more variants of the route. The urbanists of Gutnov’s school proposed comfortably equipping these lanes with benches, plant trees or sometimes cover them with glazed roofs of arcades. Maybe one of the main differences of Gutnov’s school from modern urbanism was less science in it and more devotion to history and culture, more effort to preserve old Moscow, remind of the lost, draw the old lines, restore the forgotten connections, grow the old city from the remains of its memories.

The town-planning analysis undertaken by Ostozhenka headed by Alexander Skokan – one of the authors of the projects in 70s – is on the one hand a set of ideas ordered for the book and the exhibition, a conceptual development. The project stands on its own, away from the Pushkin Museum reconstruction competition, even though it touches the same territory, only wider, concentrating on the territories located a bit further from the museum and someway or other suggesting its vision of the district. As known, Alexander Skokan entered the jury board for the reconstruction competition, it all happened almost at the same time: the exhibition and the book presentation took place in the end of May and the results of the competition were aired in the end of June.

On the other hand, apart from the momentary tasks, this architectural research project has a way more ambitious goal: standing on the theoretical level the authors attempted to develop the universal principles of reconstructing the historical centers of Russian cities uniting the effective sides of high-tech European approach – proved in practice many times – with a more historic, attentive method of city culture investigation, a detailed “reading” of the place and writing to some extend its history by means of urban studies. The structure of old Russian cities is too contradictory and multilayered, there are too many “scars” on it and that is why it needs more attention – think the authors. It is no coincidence that on the last page of the booklet there is a sewing pattern from Burda magazine – a visible reflection of the multiple contours found and shown in the city – traces of memory making its space conscious as well as comfortable.

***

The architects have prepared an edition of their project as a brochure and demonstrated it on a stand at “Zodchestvo” Festival in December.

30 December 2014

Headlines now

Object

The Golden Crown

The concept for a dental clinic in Yekaterinburg, developed by CNTR Studio, revolves around the idea of a “mouth full of gold”: pristine white porcelain stoneware walls are complemented by matte brass details. To avoid an overly literal interpretation, the architects focused on the building’s proportions, skillfully navigating between sunlight requirements and fire safety regulations.

News

Flexibility and Integration

Not long ago, we covered the project for the fourth phase of the ÁLIA residential complex, designed by APEX. Now, we’ve been shown different fence concepts they developed to enclose the complex’s private courtyards, incorporating a variety of public functions. We believe that the sheer fact that the complex’s architects were involved in such a detail as fencing speaks volumes.

Object

A Step Forward

The HIDE residential complex represents a major milestone for ADM architects and their leaders Andrey Romanov and Ekaterina Kuznetsova in their quest for a fresh high-rise aesthetic – one that is flexible and layered, capable of bringing vibrancy to mass and silhouette while shaping form. Over recent years, this approach has become ADM’s “signature style”, with the golden HIDE tower playing a pivotal role in its evolution. Here, we delve into the project’s story, explore the details of the complex’s design, and uncover its core essence.

Object

Gold in the Sands

A new office for a transcontinental company specializing in resource extraction and processing has opened in Dubai. Designed by T+T Architects, masters of creating spaces that are contemporary, diverse, flexible, and original, this project exemplifies their expertise. On the executive floor, a massive brass-clad partition dominates, while layered textures of compressed earth create a contextually resonant backdrop.

Object

Layers and Levels of Flight

This project goes way back – Reserve Union won this architectural competition at the end of 2011, and the building was completed in 2018, so it’s practically “archival”. However, despite being relatively unknown, the building can hardly be considered “dated” and remains a prime example of architectural expression, particularly in the headquarters genre. And it’s especially fitting for an aviation company office. In some ways, it resembles the Aeroflot headquarters at Sheremetyevo but with its own unique identity, following the signature style of Vladimir Plotkin. In this article, we take an in-depth look at the United Aircraft Corporation (UAC) headquarters in the Moscow agglomeration town of Zhukovsky, supplemented by recent photographs from Alexey Naroditsky – a shoot that became only recently possible due to the fact that improvements were finally made in the surrounding area.

Object

Light and Shadow

In this article, we delve into the architectural design of the “Chaika” house by DNK ag architects, which was recently completed in 2023 as part of the collection of signature designs at ZILArt. As is well-known, all the buildings in this complex follow a design code, yet each one is distinct. This particular building stands out not only for its whiteness and minimalism but also for the refined use of a limited number of techniques that, together, create what can confidently be called synergy.

View

Casus Novae

A master plan was developed for a large residential area with a name of “DNS City”, but now that its implementation began, the plan has been arbitrarily reformatted and replaced with something that, while similar on the surface, is actually quite different. This is not the first time such a thing happens, but it’s always frustrating. With permission from the author, we are sharing Maria Elkina’s post.

Report

Treasure Hunting

The GAFA bureau, in collaboration with Tegola and Arkhitail, organized an expedition to the island of Kilpola in Karelia as part of Moskomarkhitektura’s “Open City” festival. There, amidst moss and rocks, the students sought answers to questions like: what is the sacred, where does it dwell, and what sustains it? Assisting the participants in this quest were landscape engineer Evgeny Levin, artist Nicholas Roerich, a moose, and the lack of cellular connection. Here’s how the story unfolded.

Object

Depths of the Earth, Streams of Water

In the Malaya Okhta district, the Akzent building, designed by Stepan Liphart, was constructed. It follows a classic tripartite structure, yet it’s what you might call “hand-drawn”: each façade is unique in its form and details, some of which aren’t immediately noticeable. In this article, we explore the context and, together with the architect, delve into how the form was developed.

Object

Fir Tree Dynamics

The “Airports of Region” holding is planning to build an airport in Karachay-Cherkessia, aiming to make the Arkhyz and Dombay resorts more accessible to travelers. The project that won in an invitation-only competition, submitted by Sergey Nikeshkin’s KPLN, blends natural imagery inspired by the shape of a conifer seed, open-air waiting spaces, majestic large trees, and a green roof elevated on needle-like columns. The result is both nature-inspired and WOW.

Object

A Brick Shell

In the process of designing a clubhouse situated among pine trees in a prestigious suburban area near Moscow, the architectural firm “A.Len” did the façade design part. The combination of different types of brick and masonry correlates with the volumetric and plastique solutions, further enhanced by the inclusion of wood-painted fragments and metal “glazing”.

Report

Word Forms

ATRIUM architects love ambitious challenges, and for the firm’s thirtieth anniversary, they boldly play a game of words with an exhibition that dives deep into a self-created vocabulary. They immerse their projects – especially art installations – into this glossary, as if plunging into a current of their own. You feel as if you’re flowing through the veins of pure art, immersed in a universe of vertical cities, educational spaces – of which the architects are true masters – and the cultural codes of various locations. But what truly captivates is the bold statement that Vera Butko and Anton Nadtochy make, both through their work and this exhibition: architecture, above all, is art – the art of working with form and space.

Object

Flexibility and Acuteness of Modernity

Luxurious, fluid, large “kokoshniks” and spiral barrel columns, as if made from colorful chewing gum: there seem to be no other mansion like this in Moscow, designed in the “Neo-Russian-Modern” style. And the “Teremok” on Malaya Kaluzhskaya, previously somewhat obscure, has “come alive with new colors” and gained visibility after its restoration for the office of the “architectural ecosystem” as the architects love to call themselves. It’s evident that Julius Borisov and the architects at UNK put their hearts into finding this new office and bringing it up to date. Let’s delve into the paradoxes of this mansion’s history and its plasticity. Spoiler: two versions of modernity meet here, both balancing on the razor’s edge of “what’s current”.

Interview

Yuri Vissarionov: “A modular house does not belong to the land”

It belongs to space, or to the air... It turns out that 3D printing is more effective when combined with a modular approach: the house is built in a workshop and then adapted to the site, including on uneven terrain. Yuri Vissarionov shares his latest experience in designing tourist complexes, both in central Russia and in the south. These include houseboats, homes printed from lightweight concrete using a 3D printer, and, of course, frame houses.

Object

Moscow’s First

“The quality of education largely depends on the quality of the educational environment”. This principle of the last decade has been realized by Sergey Skuratov in the project for the First Moscow Gymnasium on Rostovskaya Embankment in the Khamovniki district. The building seamlessly integrates into the complex urban landscape, responding both to the pedestrian flow of the city and the quiet alleyways. It skillfully takes advantage of the height differences and aligns with modern trends in educational space design. Let’s take a closer look.

Object

Looking at the Water

The site of Villa Sonata stretches from the road to the water’s edge, offering its own shoreline, pier, and a picturesque river panorama. To reveal these sweeping views, Roman Leonidov “cut” the façade diagonally parallel to the river, thus getting two main axes for the house and, consequently, “two heads”. The internal core – two double-height spaces, a living room and a conservatory, with a “bridge” above them – makes the house both “transparent” and filled with light.

Object

The White Wing

Well, it’s not exactly white. It’s more of a beige, white-stone structure that plays with the color of limestone – smoother surfaces are lighter, while rougher ones are darker. This wing unites various elements: it absorbs and interprets the surrounding themes. It responds to everything, yet maintains a cohesive expression – a challenging task! – while also incorporating recognizable features of its own, such as the dynamic cuts at the bottom, top, and middle.

Object

Urban Dunes

The XSA Ramps team designed and built a three-part sports hub for a park in Rostov-on-Don, welcoming people of all ages and fitness levels. The skate plaza, pump track, and playground are all meticulously crafted with details that attract a diverse range of visitors. The technical execution of the shapes and slopes transforms this space into a kind of sculptural composition.

Object

Proportional Growth

The project for the fourth phase of the ÁLIA residential area has been announced. The buildings are situated on an elongated plot – almost a “ray” that shoots out from the center of the area towards the river. Their layout reflects both a response to Moscow’s architectural preferences over the past 15 years, shifting “from blocks to towers”, and an interpretation of the neighboring business park designed by SOM. Additionally, the best apartments here are not located at the very top but closer to the middle, forming a glowing “waistline”.

Object

The “Staircase” Building

In designing the “Details” residential complex in New Moscow, Rais Baishev spiced up the now-popular Moscow theme of a “courtyard” building with an idea drawn from the surrealist drawings by Maurits Escher. He envisioned the stepped silhouettes and descending slopes as a metaphysical mega-staircase, creating a key void within the courtyard that gave the project an internal “spine”. This concept is felt both in the building’s silhouette and on its façades.

Object

Projection of the Quarter

No one doubted that the building that Vladimir Plotkin designed as part of the “Garden Quarters” would be the most modernist of all. And it turned out just that way: while adhering to the common design code, the building successfully combines brick and white stone, rhythmically responding to the neighboring building designed by Ostozhenka, yet tactfully and persistently making a few statements of its own. This includes the projection of the ideal urban development composition “14–9–6”, which can be found right next door, mathematical calculations, including those for various types of terraces (and perhaps the only reminder of the Soviet past of the Kauchuk rubber factory!), and the white “cross-stitch” pattern of the façade grid.

Object

Domus Aurea

In this issue, we examine the “Tessinsky-1” house, designed by Sergey Skuratov and completed in 2023. Located in the middle of the Serebryanicheskaya Embankment district, at the intersection of its main streets, this house assumes a sort of “nodal” role: it not only responds to everything around it and preserves many memories of the former EMA factory within itself, but it weaves all this into a newly directed pattern, reconciling bright “gold” and dark-colored brick, largely with the help of the new, modern-yet-archaic Columba brick, which, come to think about it, is the most precious element here.

send.project

The Chimney of Nikola-Lenivets

In this issue, we are examining the “Obelisk House” designed by KATARSIS and built for the Arkhstoyanie 2023 festival. However, it was only finished later on, and this is why we are examining it now. It seems to us that after the “Obelisk House” appeared in Nikola-Lenivets, a dialogue and a few inner connections appeared between the temporary structures built here. These houses no longer look like “accidental neighbors”, more of which below.

Periscope by the Bay

The jury awarded the second place in the competition for a public and cultural center in Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky to the companies GORA (“Mountain”) and M4. In the consortium’s proposal, the building resembles a sperm whale with a calf swimming next to it or a periscope, whose lenses capture the most spectacular views from the surrounding landscape.

Contest Results

From Arcs to Dolmens

While working on the competition project for Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky, ASADOV Architects prioritized the value of the natural and urban environment, aiming to preserve the balance of the location while minimizing the resemblance of the volume that they designed to a “traditional building”. The task was challenging, and the architects created three versions, one of which having been developed after the competition, where their main proposal took third place. However, the point of interest here is not the competition result but the continuity of creative thinking.

Object

Hide and Seek

The ID Moskovskiy house, designed by Stepan Liphart in St. Petersburg, in the courtyards near Moskovskiy Avenue beyond the Obvodny Canal and recently completed, is notable for several reasons. Firstly, it has been realized with considerable accuracy, which is particularly significant as this is the first building where the architect was responsible not only for the facades but also for the layouts, allowing for better integration between the two. On the other hand, this building is interesting as an example of the “germination” of new architecture in the city: it draws on the best examples from the neighborhood and becomes an improved and developed sum of ideas found by the architect in the surrounding context.

The Big Twelve

Yesterday, the winners of the Moscow Mayor’s Architecture Award were announced and honored. Let’s take a look at what was awarded and, in some cases, even critique this esteemed award. After all, there is always room for improvement, right?

Object

Above the Golden Horn

The residential complex “Philosophy” designed by T+T architects in Vladivostok, is one of the new projects in the “Golubinaya Pad” area, changing its development philosophy (pun intended) from single houses to a comprehensive approach. The buildings are organized along public streets, varying in height and format, with one house even executed in gallery typology, featuring a cantilever leaning on an art object.

Report

Nuanced Alternative

How can you rhyme a square and space? Easily! But to do so, you need to rhyme everything you can possibly think of: weave everything together, like in a tensegrity structure, and find your own optics too. The new exhibition at GES-2 does just that, offering its visitor a new perspective on the history of art spanning 150 years, infused with the hope for endless multiplicity of worlds and art histories. Read on to see how this is achieved and how the exhibition design by Evgeny Ace contributes to it.

Object

Blinds for Ice

An ice arena has been constructed in Domodedovo based on a project by Yuri Vissarionov Architects. To prevent the long façade, a technical requirement for winter sports facilities, from appearing monotonous, the architects proposed the use of suspended structures with multidirectional slats. This design protects the ice from direct sunlight while giving the wall texture and detail.