По-русски

The Arch and the Triangle

The new Stone Mnevniki business center by Kleinewelt Architekten – designed for the same client as their projects in Khodynka – bears certain similarities to those earlier developments, but not entirely. In Mnevniki, there are more angular elements, and the architects themselves describe the project as being built on contrast. Indeed, while the first phase contains subtle references to classical architecture – light touches like arches, both upright and inverted, evoking the spirit of the 1980s – the second phase draws more distantly on the modernism of the 1970s. What unites them is a boldly expressive public space design, a kaleidoscope of rays and triangles.

17 April 2025
Object
mainImg
The Mnevniki floodplain is undergoing intensive development now. Over the past few years, the residential complex “Ostrov” has been under construction here, along with several sports venues, including Irina Navka’s Ice Palace. A government building and a new circus are also planned for the area. This narrow loop of the Moskva River – until recently a purely natural landscape – now presents a striking contrast: forest, vacant land, fences, construction sites, and already completed buildings and squares, often clustered around metro stations.

From the functional standpoint – for now, at least – the area is dominated by housing and sports infrastructure; offices are a natural addition in such a setting. The emergence of the Stone Mnevniki business center is therefore quite logical and connects with other projects by the same developer and largely the same architects, Kleinewelt Architekten, such as Khodynka 2 and 3. That area, too, is a developing district, although slightly further along in its residential development. Typologically, the business centers in Khodynka and Mnevniki are related. Similarities can also be seen in their spatial compositions: each consists of three buildings constructed in two phases, laid out in a longitudinal sequence.

Stone Mnevniki is located in a spot well-suited for a business center – between the main route running through the floodplain, the Nizhnie Mnevniki Street, and the slope of the Moskva River. The elevation drop is modest – only 6 meters – just beyond an almost perfectly flat site where the first phase of the business center is already under construction. The riverbank will also be landscaped in the future, and there is also a municipal development plan for the entire Mnevniki riverfront.

  • zooming
    STONE Mnevniki Business Center. Location plan
    Copyright: © Kleinewelt Architekten
  • zooming
    STONE Mnevniki Business Center
    Copyright: © Kleinewelt Architekten


The business center will greet drivers coming from Zvenigorodskoe Highway, appearing on their right just before they reach Ostrov. At present, the two are separated by the site of the former Galalit factory, which was shut down in the 1960s. The main thoroughfare provides excellent accessibility for motorists, and the underground parking garage spans two levels. From Terekhovo metro station, it’s about a 10-15-minute walk.

The road gradually curves toward the Moskva River, giving the site a trapezoidal shape – almost that of an elongated triangle whose sharp point directs toward Zvenigorodskoe Highway. The development phases are arranged accordingly: the first phase, located in the southwest part of the plot, features a tower-like building with a nearly square base and 18 stories. The second phase includes two 12-story volumes connected by a bridge structure stretching from the 3rd to the 10th floor.

  • zooming
    STONE Mnevniki Business Center
    Copyright: © Kleinewelt Architekten
  • zooming
    STONE Mnevniki Business Center
    Copyright: © Kleinewelt Architekten


The bridge has a rooftop terrace, and underneath it, a wide “arch” is formed – a design element popular among architects of the 1970s but largely abandoned in later decades. This arch is intended to provide open access to the riverfront, as well as views of the water, the golf course on the opposite bank, and the distant “Island of Fantasy. It’s quite possible that in late June, when the sun sets in the northwest, its last rays will shine directly through this arch – and also between the buildings of the first and second phases.

  • zooming
    STONE Mnevniki Business Center. Phase II
    Copyright: © Kleinewelt Architekten
  • zooming
    STONE Mnevniki Business Center. Phase II
    Copyright: © Kleinewelt Architekten


The “arch” rests on round columns, allowing for a substantial span – about 23 meters wide. The columns are set at a slight diagonal, echoing the plot’s geometry and the angled facades facing the river. This configuration also helps shape a plaza on the side facing the road: the western building of the second phase steps back toward the river, allowing the space under the bridge and the area in front of the building to merge into a square. At the entrance to the arch, there are double-height lobbies on either side that serve as the main entrances for each building.

STONE Mnevniki Business Center. Phase II. Ground Floor Plan at 0.000
Copyright: © Kleinewelt Architekten


  • zooming
    STONE Mnevniki Business Center. Phase II. Typical Floor Plan (Levels 3–8)
    Copyright: © Kleinewelt Architekten
  • zooming
    STONE Mnevniki Business Center. Phase II. Plan of the 12th floor
    Copyright: © Kleinewelt Architekten


The square and the “arch” lend the site both a truly urban character and permeability, offering a direct pedestrian link from the main road to the embankment while introducing a touch of spatial intrigue. The high canopy of the arch provides shelter from the rain – making it an ideal spot for café seating with views of the river and the sunset. At the same time, it conveys a sense of wonder, as a massive structure appears to float above, and we are able to walk through the building in a passage that is both open and expansive. This quality – along with its functional benefits – is what made 1970s-era bridge structures so compelling, and why they are being revived today.

STONE Mnevniki Business Center. Phase II
Copyright: © Kleinewelt Architekten


The views have been carefully considered – not only from the Mnevniki side but also, crucially, from the river. Here too, sunlight plays an important role, especially at sunset, with reflections coming from both the glass surfaces and the water itself. The business center stands right at the edge of the descent to the riverbank, making it highly visible from the water.

STONE Mnevniki Business Center
Copyright: © Kleinewelt Architekten


STONE Mnevniki Business Center. Phase II
Copyright: © Kleinewelt Architekten


STONE Mnevniki Business Center. Phase II
Copyright: © Kleinewelt Architekten


A clarification is in order at this point. The reason we put “arch” in quotation marks when referring to the second phase is that it doesn’t actually have an arched shape. It’s more of an opening or a passage than a true arch, although we’ve grown up calling such underpasses in modernist structures “arches”. Still, the term is a kind of convention. In Moscow, the 1950s to 1970s weren’t particularly fond of arches as a form. Only in the 1980s – leaving aside Niemeyer’s influence – did architects begin to reconsider them. At the same time, Moscow has quite recently experienced what one might call an “arch craze”, dating roughly from the late 2010s into the early 2020s. These newer arches are mostly decorative and stylized, stripped of traditional architectural elements like imposts or such like.

And the building from the first phase gives us exactly such arches.

The facades of this building are conceived as double-skin – and in a very emphatic way. The outer “shell” is set back from the inner glass prism by about two meters. It is pierced by large arches: one on each façade near the top. These arches are inverted and resemble Gothic “horns” or fortress “crenellations”, although the resemblance is all but distant. Meanwhile, the top of the outer surface appears to “slip off” the inner prism in a deliberate way, evoking distant echoes of a fortress tower. This building serves as the vertical focal point of the entire business center.

  • zooming
    STONE Mnevniki Business Center. Phase I
    Copyright: © Kleinewelt Architekten
  • zooming
    STONE Mnevniki Business Center. Phase I
    Copyright: © Kleinewelt Architekten


The outer shell is composed of closely spaced vertical metal louvers. They enhance the building’s slenderness and act as an intermediate surface in front of the façade, producing various visual effects depending on the viewing angle – sunlight reflections and highlights during the day, and a naturally shifting pattern of interior light in the evenings. It goes without saying that, unlike the large parabolic arches – neo-modernist in character – the louvers are a “classic” device from the 1970s, refined to near-perfection in that era and executed in a range of formats. The only difference is that now they’re made of metal, not concrete.

  • zooming
    STONE Mnevniki Business Center. Phase I
    Copyright: © Kleinewelt Architekten
  • zooming
    STONE Mnevniki Business Center. Phase I
    Copyright: © Kleinewelt Architekten


There are only two lower arches, positioned directly opposite each other on a central axis: one marks the entrance from the highway side, the other from the river. The riverside exit is rendered fantastically well in the visualizations – you almost feel like asking for a swim there.

  • zooming
    STONE Mnevniki Business Center. Phase I
    Copyright: © Kleinewelt Architekten
  • zooming
    STONE Mnevniki Business Center. Phase I
    Copyright: © Kleinewelt Architekten


Both arches rise to a height of six stories and are outlined with prominent, protruding archivolts made of glass-fiber-reinforced concrete. There is no through-passage between the arches: there’s a lobby on the highway side, with turnstiles, security, and six elevators; there are side exits on the lateral facades, and there’s a café at the corner facing the river – for people strolling along the embankment and for employees alike.

  • zooming
    STONE Mnevniki Business Center. Phase I. Ground Floor Plan at Elevation 0.000
    Copyright: © Kleinewelt Architekten
  • zooming
    STONE Mnevniki Business Center. Phase I. Sixth floor plan at elevation +21.300
    Copyright: © Kleinewelt Architekten


I’ll say it plainly: in my imagination, a luxurious six-story atrium “tunnel” between the two arches, with panoramic elevators, would be perfectly fitting here. But it would have taken up a third of the entire vertical volume, and ultimately, this isn’t a Moscow City skyscraper – spatial efficiency is also a consideration here.

  • zooming
    STONE Mnevniki Business Center. Phase I
    Copyright: © Kleinewelt Architekten
  • zooming
    STONE Mnevniki Business Center. Phase I
    Copyright: © Kleinewelt Architekten


Still, these decorative arches – impressive portals forming the two main façades of the first phase – echo the through “arch” passage of the second phase.

A kind of dialogue emerges between them.

And also between the two phases as a whole: according to the architects, it’s a dialogue of contrast.

In this project, we deliberately tried to make things as contrastive as possible: a light, vertically elongated glass volume – almost weightless – stands next to a horizontally stretched building, confident in its form. They seem to reflect two states – movement and stillness, air and earth. This contrast is not just a visual device but a means to create a striking and memorable silhouette, where nature and architecture come together, not overpowering one another but enhancing each other. We wanted harmony to emerge from this opposition.


However, it’s important to note that this contrast doesn’t amount to conflict – the overall business center reads as quite cohesive.

STONE Mnevniki Isiness Center. Phase I
Copyright: © Kleinewelt Architekten


From the city side, it greets us with a truncated prow; from the “Ostrov” complex side, with a somewhat monumental gesture made through its deliberately unfinished-looking propylaea and “tell-tale” inverted arches.

STONE Mnevniki Business Center. Phase II
Copyright: © Kleinewelt Architekten


Indeed, the first-phase building is more monumental – you might even see a tetrapylon in it, a nod to Roman monuments on the forum… It’s all arches and verticals. The second phase next to it is more horizontal, with a diagonal grid, a through passage, and slanted façade planes – much more “modernist.”

Even so, the contrast is handled mostly through nuance. All the buildings are glass; all the lower tiers are “stone” and, what’s more, they are planned to be clad in real stone – although, in my opinion, concrete wouldn’t be a bad fit either. Again, there are subtle differences between the two: the first-tier of Phase One leans toward 1980s solutions, with schematic lines near the tops of pilasters that even suggest – with just a hint, mind – capitals of a column.

STONE Mnevniki Business Center. Phase II
Copyright: © Kleinewelt Architekten


In the second phase, the pilasters are slanted, cut at the bottom, with structural cantilevers; and the texture resembles concrete more closely.



In other words, the already-under-construction first phase leans toward the 1980s – a time fascinated by classicism, though still in a softened form – and is also “calibrated” to meet the aesthetic interests of the 2020s. The second phase, slated for later construction, leans toward the 1970s. It’s an intriguingly particle-wave sort of logic in the search for historical models.

A separate chapter of the project is the landscaping design. The architects proposed paving made from differently toned triangles, and they extended the same “radiating” concept to the design of benches, planters, and flowerbeds. The result is rather bold: while the first-phase “tower” with its arches supports the themes introduced by the “Ostrov” complex – which in its middle zone is fairly classical in spirit, with a block layout and art deco clubhouses – the eastern buildings completely break stylistically from that context, evoking a different kind of nostalgia: a modernist one. And that, it must be said, is much more relevant today than arches as such. So everything is accurate and on point – the evolution is headed precisely in that direction, and it doesn’t contradict the overall modernity of the business center as a whole: it is, after all, quite contemporary, with all its glass and metal.

In the end, the bold, angular landscaping ties it all together, like a kind of “leap into the future”. Star shapes, lighting effects… a kaleidoscope.

17 April 2025

Headlines now
Pro Forma
Photos have emerged of the newly completed whisky distillery in Chernyakhovsk, designed by TOTEMENT / PAPER – a continuation of their earlier work on the nearby Cognac Museum. From what is, in essence, a merely technical and utilitarian volume and space, the architects have created a fully-fledged theatre of impressions. Let’s take a closer look. We highly recommend a visit to what may look like a factory, but is in fact an experiment in theatricalizing the process of strong spirit production – and not only that, but also of “pure art”, capable of evolving anywhere.
The Arch and the Triangle
The new Stone Mnevniki business center by Kleinewelt Architekten – designed for the same client as their projects in Khodynka – bears certain similarities to those earlier developments, but not entirely. In Mnevniki, there are more angular elements, and the architects themselves describe the project as being built on contrast. Indeed, while the first phase contains subtle references to classical architecture – light touches like arches, both upright and inverted, evoking the spirit of the 1980s – the second phase draws more distantly on the modernism of the 1970s. What unites them is a boldly expressive public space design, a kaleidoscope of rays and triangles.
Health Factory
While working on a wellness and tourist complex on the banks of the Yenisei River, the architects at Vissarionov Studio set out to create healing spaces that would amplify the benefits of nature and medical treatments for both body and soul. The spatial solutions are designed to encourage interaction between the guests and the landscape, as well as each other.
The Blooming Mechanics of a Glass Forest
The Savvinskaya 27 apartment complex built by Level Group, currently nearing completion on an elongated riverfront site next to the Novodevichy Convent, boasts a form that’s daring even by modern Moscow standards. Visually, it resembles the collaborative creation of a glassblower and a sculptor: a kind of glass-and-concrete jungle, rhythmically structured yet growing energetically and vividly. Bringing such an idea to life was by no means an easy task. In this article, we discuss the concept by ODA and the methods used by APEX architects to implement it, along with a look at the building’s main units and detailing.
Grace and Unity
Villa “Grace”, designed by Roman Leonidov’s studio and built in the Moscow suburbs, strikes a balance between elegant minimalism and the expansive gestures of the Russian soul. The main house is conceived as a sequence of four self-contained volumes – each could exist independently, yet it chooses to be part of a whole. Unity is achieved through color and a system of shared spaces, while the rich plasticity of the forms – refined throughout the construction process – compensates for the near-total absence of decorative elements.
Daring Brilliance
In this article, we are exploring “New Vision”, the first school built in the past 25 years in Moscow’s Khamovniki. The building has three main features: it is designed in accordance with the universal principles of modern education, fostering learning through interaction and more; second, the façades combine structural molded glass and metallic glazed ceramics – expensive and technologically advanced materials. Third, this is the school of Garden Quarters, the latest addition to Moscow’s iconic Khamovniki district. Both a costly and, in its way, audacious acquisition, it carries a youthful boldness in its statement. Let’s explore how the school is designed and where the contrasts lie.
A Twist of the Core
A clever and concise sculptural solution – rotating each floor by N degrees – has created an ensemble of “dancing” towers: similar yet different, simple yet complex. The designers meticulously refined a single structural node and spent considerable effort on the column construction – after that, “everything else was easy”. The architects also rotated the core walls on each floor to maximize the efficiency of the office spaces.
The Sculpting of Spring Forest Matter
We’ve been observing this building for a couple of years now: seemingly simple, perhaps even unassuming, it fits in remarkably well with the micro-district context shaped by the Moscow MCD road junctions. This building sticks in the memory of everyone who drives along the highway, even occasionally. In our opinion, Sergey Nikeshkin, by blending popular architectural techniques and approaches of the 2010s, managed to turn a seemingly simple structure into a statement “on the theme of a house as such”. Let’s figure out how this happened.
Water and Wind Whet the Stone
The Arisha Terraces residential complex, designed by Asadov Architects, will be built in a district of Dubai dedicated to film and television production. To create shaded spaces and an intriguing silhouette, the architects opted for a funnel-shaped composition and nature-inspired forms of erosion and weathering. The roofs, podium, and underground spaces extend leisure opportunities within the boundaries of a man-made “oasis”.
Elevation 5642
The Genplan Institute of Moscow has developed a comprehensive development project for three ski resorts in the Caucasus, which have been designated as special economic zones of the tourism and recreation type. The first of these zones is Elbrus. The project includes the construction of new ski runs, cable cars, and hotels, as well as the modernization of stations and improvements to the Azau tourist meadow. To expand the audience and enhance year-round appeal, a network of eco-trails is also being developed. In this article, we provide a detailed breakdown of each stage.
The IT Town
Taking the example of the first completed phase of the “U” district, we examine how the new neighborhood in Innopolis will be organized. T+T Architects and HADAA formed a well-balanced and ingenious master plan with different types of housing, a green artery, a system of squares, and a park in the town’s central part.
The Heart Lies Within
The second-phase building of the Evgeny Primakov School already won multiple awards while still in the design stage. Now that it’s completed, some unfinished nuances remain – most notably, the exposed ceiling structures, which ideally should have been concealed. However, given the priority placed on the building’s volumetric composition, this does not seem critical. What matters more is the “Wow!” effect created by the space itself.
Magnetic Forces
“Krylatskaya 33” is the first large-scale residential complex to appear amidst the 1980s “micro-districts” that harmoniously coexist with the forests, the river, the slopes, and the sports infrastructure. Despite its imposing scale, the architects of Ostozhenka managed to turn the complex into something that can be best described as a “graceful dominant”. First, they designed the complex with consideration for the style and height of the surrounding micro-districts. Second, by introducing a pause in its tallest section, they created compositional tension – right along the urban planning axis of the area.
Orion’s Belt
The Stone Khodynka 2 office complex, designed by Kleinewelt Architekten for the company Stone, is built with an ergonomic layout following “healthy building” principles: natural light, ventilation, and all the necessary features for an efficient office environment. On the outside, it resembles – like many contemporary buildings – an iPhone: sleek, glowing, glass-and-metal, edges elegantly rounded. Yet, it responds sensitively to the Khodynka context, where the main theme is the contrast between vertical and horizontal lines. The key intrigue lies in the design of the “stylobate” as a suspended passage, leaving the space beneath it open for free pedestrian movement.
Grigory Revzin: “It Was a Bold Statement Made on the Sly. Something Won”
In this article, we discuss the debates surrounding the circus competition and the demolition of the CMEA building with the most renowned architectural critic of our time. A paradox emerges in the process: while nostalgia for the Brezhnev era seems to be in vogue in Russia, a landmark building – the “axis” of the Warsaw Pact – has been sentenced to demolition. Isn’t that strange? We also find out that wow-architecture has made a comeback as a post-COVID trend. However, to make a truly powerful statement, professionals still remain indispensable.
Exposed Concrete
One of the stages of improving a small square in the town of Lermontov was the construction of a skatepark. Entrusting this part of the project to the XSA team, the city gained a 250-meter trick track whose features resemble those of land art objects – unparalleled in Russia in both scale and design. Here’s a look at how the experimental snake run in the foothills of the Caucasus was built.
One Step Closer To the Dream
The challenges of getting all the mandatory approvals, an insufficient budget, and construction site difficulties did not prevent ASADOV Bureau from achieving its main goal in the realization of the school project in the town of Troitsk – taking another step away from outdated notions of educational spaces toward creating a fundamentally new academic environment.
Chalet on the Rock
An Accor hotel in Arkhyz, designed by A.Len, will be situated at the gateway to the resort’s main tourist hubs. The architects reinterpreted the widely popular chalet style while adding an unexpected twist – an unfinished structure preserved on the site. The design team transformed this remnant into an exciting space featuring an open-air pool and a restaurant with panoramic views of the region’s highest mountain ridges.
Sergey Skuratov: “By and large, the project has been realized in line with the original ideas”
In this issue, we talk to the chief architect of Garden Quarters, looking back at the history and key moments of a project that took 18 years to develop and has now finally been completed. What interests us most are the transformations that the project underwent during construction, and the way the “necessary void” of public space was formed, which turned this remarkable complex into a fragment of a whole new type of urban fabric – not just at the horizontal “street” level but in its vertical structure as well.
A Unique Representative
The recently concluded year 2024 can be considered the year of completion for the “Garden Quarters” residential complex in Moscow’s Khamovniki. This project is well-known and, in many ways, iconic. Rarely does one manage to preserve such a number of original ideas, achieving in the end a kind of urban planning Gesamtkunstwerk. Here is a subjective view from an architecture journalist, with an interview with Sergey Skuratov soon to follow.
Field of Life
The new project by the architectural company PNKB (an acronym for “Design, Research, and Advisory Bureau”), led by Sergey Gnedovsky and Anton Lyubimkin, for the Kulikovo Field Museum is dedicated to the field as a concept in its own right. The field has long been a focus of the museum’s thorough and successful research. Accordingly, the exterior of the new museum building is gentler than that of its predecessor, which was also designed by PNKB and dedicated specifically to the historic battle. Inside, however, the building confidently guides the visitor from a luminous atrium along a spiral path to the field – interpreted here as a field of life.
A Paper Clip above the River
In this article, we talk with Vitaly Lutz from the Genplan Institute of Moscow about the design and unique features of the pedestrian bridge that now links the two banks of the Yauza River in the new cluster of Bauman Moscow State Technical University (MSTU). The bridge’s form and functionality – particularly the inclusion of an amphitheater suspended over the river – were conceived during the planning phase of the territory’s development. Typically, this approach is not standard practice, but the architects advocate for it, referring to this intermediate project phase as the “pre-AGR” stage (AGR stands for Architectural and Urban Planning Approval). Such a practice, they argue, helps define key parameters of future projects and bridge the gap between urban planning and architectural design.
Living in the Architecture of One’s Own Making
Do architects design houses for themselves? You bet! In this article, we are examining a new book by TATLIN publishing house. This book – unprecedented for Russia – features 52 private homes designed and built by contemporary architects for themselves. It includes houses that are famous, even iconic, as well as lesser-known ones; large and small, stylish and eccentric. To some extent, the book reflects the history of Russian architecture over the past 30 years.
A City Block Isoline
Another competition project for a residential complex on the banks of the Volga in Nizhny Novgorod has been prepared by Studio 44. A team of architects led by Ivan Kozhin concluded that using a regular block layout in such a location would be inappropriate and developed a “custom design” approach: a chain of parceled multi-section buildings stretching along the entire embankment. Let’s explore the features and advantages of this unconventional method.
Competition: The Price of Creativity?
Any day now, we’re expecting the results of a competition held by the “Samolet” development group for a plot in Kommunarka. In the meantime, we share the impressions of Editor-in-Chief Julia Tarabarina, who managed to conduct a public talk. Though technically focused on the interaction between developers and architects, the public talk turned into a discussion about the pros and cons of architectural competitions.
Terraced Design
The “River Park” residential complex has confidently and securely shaped the Nagatinsky Backwater shoreline. Featuring a public embankment, elevated courtyards connected by pedestrian bridges, and brick façades, the development invites exploration of its nuanced response to the surrounding context, as well as hints of the architects’ megalithic design thinking.
A Kremlin’s Core and Meteorite Fragments
We continue our coverage of the competition projects for the residential district that the development company GloraX plans to build along the embankment of the Rowing Channel in Nizhny Novgorod. ASADOV Architects approached the concept through a deep dive into local identity, using storytelling to pinpoint a central idea for the design: the master plan and composition are imagined as if a meteorite had struck a “proto-Kremlin”. Sounds weird? Find more details below!
The Volga Regatta
GloraX plans to develop a residential complex spanning 14 hectares along the Volga River in Nizhny Novgorod. The winning design in a closed-door competition, created by GORA Architects, features housing typologies ranging from townhouses to terraced high-rise slabs, a balance of functions, diverse ways of engaging with the water, and even a dedicated island (no less!) for the city residents.
Life Plans
The master plan for the residential district “Prityazheniye” (“Gravity”) in Naberezhnye Chelny was developed by the architectural company A.Len, taking into account the specific urban planning context and partially implemented solutions of the first phase. However, the master plan prioritized its own values: a green framework, a system of focal points, a hierarchy of spaces, and pedestrian priority. After this, the question of what residents will do in their neighborhood simply doesn’t arise.
A New Track
We took a thorough look at D_Station, a railcar repair depot dating back to 1906, recently reconstructed while preserving its century-old industrial structure, upon the project by Sergey Trukhanov and T+T Architects. Though work on the interiors – set to house restaurants and public spaces – is still underway, the building’s exterior already offers plenty to see. Visitors can explore the blend of old and new brickwork, appreciate the architect’s unique interpretation of ruin aesthetics, and enjoy the newly built pedestrian route that connects the Citydel Business Center’s arches to Kazakova Street.