По-русски

One Step Closer To the Dream

The challenges of getting all the mandatory approvals, an insufficient budget, and construction site difficulties did not prevent ASADOV Bureau from achieving its main goal in the realization of the school project in the town of Troitsk – taking another step away from outdated notions of educational spaces toward creating a fundamentally new academic environment.

07 February 2025
Object
mainImg
There are always differences between a project and its realization. Adjustments, substitutions, and sometimes even losses are inevitable during the documentation and construction process. This can be hard to accept, especially when dealing with an innovative project developed with input from teachers and future students, and when the school is being built with public funds, potentially serving as a model for dozens of new schools across the country.

Fortunately, the Troitsk school project (read more about it here) was implemented with minimal alterations. This was made possible by the architects’ persistence and ingenuity, the support of the Moscow Department of Education and Science, and the school administration, as well as a compelling argument – the Moscow Mayor’s Prize in Architecture, awarded to the design team back in 2020.

It is interesting to trace which design solutions were successfully implemented, which had to be adjusted, and how they have performed in practice during the school’s first six months of operation. To help readers compare and identify the differences between the project and its realization, we have included several visualizations alongside photographs in this publication.



Amidst the Trees

The school was built on a site within a forested area, which sparked prolonged and heated conflicts with local residents protesting against tree cutting and the closure of a walking trail. To mitigate the conflict and minimize the environmental impact, the architects and designers had to carefully select the construction footprint, considering not only the required fire safety setbacks but also the trail’s path and underground utilities.

Later on, it was ultimately decided to dismantle the underground utilities. As for the trail, the landscaping project included a designated pathway that now divides the school grounds into a sports area and the main building. Gates were installed on both sides of the path, but, paradoxically, safety regulations require them to remain closed.



The constraints on building footprint, the effort to preserve as many trees as possible, and the extensive and diverse functional requirements of the school all shaped an inventive layout. The result is a structure resembling either an asymmetrical leaf or a slightly disheveled starfish, with five “branches” extending from a central atrium block.

This distinctive configuration allowed for maximum natural lighting in the interior spaces. Moreover, the design takes full advantage of the surrounding forest, offering sweeping views through large facade windows and expansive glazed end walls.



The importance of the forest setting is further emphasized in the facade treatment. The original design called for ceramic cladding in reddish-brown and yellow-orange hues, meant to echo the color of sunlit pine trunks. However, during the working design phase, budget constraints necessitated replacing the ceramic panels with smaller-scale concrete tiles embedded with marble chips. As a result, the facade design was adjusted – color shades and rhythm of alternation were modified – but the overall concept of an autumnal forest remained intact. The original angled facade elements, protruding from the main wall surface, were also preserved. Additionally, the facades are adorned with mosaic patterns reminiscent of those found in Soviet modernist architecture, creating a series of decorative motifs.



The switch to a smaller-scale cladding material had another unintended benefit: it helped conceal construction imperfections that emerged during the erection of monolithic and block walls. Some sections of the walls ended up warped in three dimensions, but the ventilated facade system largely managed to compensate for these irregularities, with varying degrees of success.

However, one issue that could not be rectified was the builders’ unconventional approach to installing the enamel-glass panels in the glazed sections. These panels were mounted with their decorative side facing inward. Interestingly, the architects noticed the mistake in time, but, following orders from an unidentified “boss” (no less!) the construction team continued installing them in reverse. Fortunately, incidents were few and far between.

  • zooming
    1 / 4
  • zooming
    2 / 4
  • zooming
    3 / 4
  • zooming
    4 / 4


A Space for Interaction

The star-shaped configuration of the school building was influenced not only by the specifics of the site but also by the architects’ intent to balance the initial goal of dividing the school into functional blocks with the need to create communal areas – spaces for relaxation and communication. The school building’s key feature fulfilling this role is the multi-story atrium situated at the junction of the blocks.



For today’s children, memorizing information is not as important as being able to find and use it, collaborating with others to go beyond the limits of your individual capabilities. A school can encourage communication, interaction, and collective creativity. From project to project, we explore the typology of schools, searching for new possibilities within it. That is why atrium spaces with amphitheaters, as well as spaces for informal communication, have become a key element of our new approach.

Another important theme is the “city” image: the atrium resembles a town square, specialized classrooms look like office centers, traditional classrooms resemble residential quarters, the auditorium and sports halls serve as public centers, while the corridors and staircases transform into thoroughfares and passageways. Even behavioral models within the school are structured in analogy with the social standards of an urban community.

We want to go further, turning schools into centers of public life in their neighborhoods. In Troitsk, we have partially achieved this, but further work is needed on typology and existing standards.




The complex functional layout of the school posed challenges for planning. Special attention was given to ensuring that younger students could be separated from the upper grades when necessary. Separate entrances were provided, and interior doors allow flexible zoning within the building. The junior-school children have their own section of the cafeteria and even a designated “junior” area in the library. However, after the school actually opened, the administration decided not to enforce strict separation – a decision that proved convenient for everyone.

There were even instances where younger students got lost, and the older ones were happy to help them find their way.

For a publicly funded school – unlike private institutions, which have more flexibility in design regulations – compliance with codes and standards was a particularly complex process. This was the case even with the introduction of the Moscow School standard in December 2021, which provided updated guidelines and recommendations (more on the standard and its documentation can be found here). The standard has been regularly revised since its adoption, with version 2.1 currently in effect.

However, no standard can account for every nuance or update all requirements, no matter how outdated or illogical they may seem today. As a result, many design solutions had to be clarified during the approval process.

  • zooming
    1 / 7
  • zooming
    2 / 7
  • zooming
    3 / 7
  • zooming
    4 / 7
  • zooming
    5 / 7
  • zooming
    6 / 7
  • zooming
    7 / 7


Each functional block presented its own challenges. For example, we spent a long time refining the kitchen block in terms of technology. We had a prototype, but during the project, the regulations changed, and we had to redesign everything.

The significant elevation differences on the site allowed us to separate different functions and blocks by height. For instance, younger children and older students enter the school at the same location but on different levels, which also made it possible to incorporate an amphitheater into the slope.

The terrain both posed challenges and suggested solutions. All academic blocks are three stories high, but at their junction, the elevation change resulted in four stories. The sports block, which by regulations should not exceed two stories, ended up on what would be the third level relative to the younger students’ section. Relocating it was not an option, as all functions had already been distributed within the volume. After reanalyzing the building layout, we realized that part of the first floor of the younger students’ block, including the cloakroom, as well as part of the public block with the swimming pool, could be interpreted as a basement level. Additionally, the double-height auditorium beneath the sports hall could be considered a single level. As a result, the sports halls were positioned on the second floor. We managed to comply with the regulations while maintaining the logical flow of the school’s layout, thanks to the flexibility of the initial structure.




Separate entrances were planned not only for different age groups. According to the project brief, the large 775-seat auditorium and the swimming pool were also intended for evening use. This goal was achieved by providing additional entrances to a zone isolated from the academic blocks, allowing local residents to access some of the facilities. For example, as of December 2024, the swimming pool has been hosting evening aqua aerobics and wellness swimming classes.

Currently, however, the parents are unable to enter the school grounds and must wait for their children outside the gate. This is despite the fact that the design included a small amphitheater with benches in front of both school entrances, intended in part for them. Nevertheless, the students enjoy spending time there during warm seasons, along with other play and sports areas near the school.



Safety concerns led to another design change. The central atrium was initially meant to be open, with its surrounding galleries enclosed by standard 1.2-meter-high metal railings. Fire safety measures included special fire-resistant curtains to isolate the atrium from smoke in case of emergency. However, in the final stages of construction, it became clear that the school students would likely attempt to climb onto the railings. To prevent accidents, it was decided to install glass enclosures around the atrium. This alteration inevitably changed the perception of the space but also significantly expanded its functionality. With glass walls, events can now be held in the atrium without their noise disturbing the students and teachers in nearby classrooms.

  • zooming
    1 / 3
  • zooming
    2 / 3
  • zooming
    3 / 3


Color and Light

The school’s space was designed to be stimulating – meant to inspire, uplift, energize, and foster a positive atmosphere for both students and teachers. A great deal was done to achieve this: abundant natural light, a balance of open and secluded spaces, carefully planned color schemes in the interiors, unconventional finishing materials, and many other architectural techniques were used to create a unique ambiance. Additionally, at the school administration’s request, the architects developed a brand book featuring a logo and corporate identity, which became part of the comprehensive project and was incorporated into the wayfinding system.

For educational institutions, it is crucial to consider how interior design affects the psychological well-being of the students and teachers. In budget-conscious projects, there is also the challenge of balancing aesthetics, cost-efficiency, and durability of materials. Additionally, we always strive to find solutions that serve an extra function – such as aiding navigation.

In this case, we proposed a unifying approach: a geometric pattern of intersecting stripes and shapes, whose variability allowed us to design both the spacious halls and corridors, as well as smaller classrooms, in a cohesive way. We selected color combinations for each school block, favoring uplifting and energetic shades while carefully maintaining visual balance between accent and background colors, especially in the classrooms.

Another advantage of this school’s custom pattern was the ease of application during construction. Its large-scale design and straight lines made it possible for the builders to apply the graphics to the walls without requiring specialized skills or the involvement of artists.




To create distinctive interior spaces, the architects even integrated structural elements that, under different circumstances, would have likely been concealed behind the building’s cladding. The auditorium ceiling was originally planned to feature beams, but the structural engineers and architects decided instead to use trusses as tall as the floor above. This level was designated for drafting and drawing classrooms, as well as part of the school library. Rather than hiding the trusses’ posts and braces within partitions, the architects painted them in a light color and transformed into a semi-transparent screen or structural framework that provides an inspiring backdrop for various creative activities.

Yet another unconventional solution that proved highly effective was the inclusion of skylights in the library, made possible by the varying roof levels. These skylights allow soft natural light to fill the reading hall, an effect further enhanced by the bright yellow walls that amplify the space’s uplifting atmosphere.

  • zooming
    1 / 10
  • zooming
    2 / 10
  • zooming
    3 / 10
  • zooming
    4 / 10
  • zooming
    5 / 10
  • zooming
    6 / 10
  • zooming
    7 / 10
  • zooming
    8 / 10
  • zooming
    9 / 10
  • zooming
    10 / 10


The six months since the school’s opening have served as a test of the project’s durability, functionality, and aesthetic value. The architects have had multiple opportunities to visit the school, observing its classrooms, hallways, and staircases, and they have already gathered valuable insights for future projects. However, the most important evaluators remain the actual users – students and teachers – who continue to reflect on their experiences and eagerly share their feedback with the architects and designers.

Elena Matyushenko, Deputy Director for Educational Content, State Autonomous Educational Institution Pushkov School.

The school’s teaching staff played an active role in the project’s development. At our initiative, the design was expanded to include a prep room next to the computer science classrooms for storing equipment, an observatory, and a platform for stargazing. At later stages, we organized faculty offices by floor and numbered the classrooms. Besides the teachers, our students also took part in shaping their future school. During a summer workshop, they proposed ideas for navigation, the layout of the hand washing area near the cafeteria, and information zones. Some of these collective ideas were incorporated into the project, while others were not, but the shared engagement and investment in quality brought everyone together.

This sense of involvement is still evident now that the school has opened. From our perspective, the most successful design solutions include high ceilings, abundant natural light, atrium spaces, spacious classrooms and hallways, a large swimming pool, a well-designed library and media center, carefully chosen color schemes, and, of course, modern equipment and facilities. However, there have been some criticisms. Some classrooms have noticeable echo, certain windows were poorly installed and let in cold air, and the hallway walls are easily stained and difficult to clean. The medical office is inconveniently located, and the small auditorium has not lived up to expectations: its telescopic seating takes up too much space, the lighting is insufficient, and the acoustics are poor. As a result, there is no suitable venue for balls, discos, or other events. We actively analyze our user experience and share feedback with designers and education specialists to improve our school’s comfort and functionality, as well as to refine future projects.




  • zooming
    1 / 13
  • zooming
    2 / 13
  • zooming
    3 / 13
  • zooming
    4 / 13
  • zooming
    5 / 13
  • zooming
    6 / 13
  • zooming
    7 / 13
  • zooming
    8 / 13
  • zooming
    9 / 13
  • zooming
    10 / 13
  • zooming
    11 / 13
  • zooming
    12 / 13
  • zooming
    13 / 13
  • zooming
    1 / 6
  • zooming
    2 / 6
  • zooming
    3 / 6
  • zooming
    4 / 6
  • zooming
    5 / 6
  • zooming
    6 / 6


07 February 2025

Headlines now
One Step Closer To the Dream
The challenges of getting all the mandatory approvals, an insufficient budget, and construction site difficulties did not prevent ASADOV Bureau from achieving its main goal in the realization of the school project in the town of Troitsk – taking another step away from outdated notions of educational spaces toward creating a fundamentally new academic environment.
Sergey Skuratov: “By and large, the project has been realized in line with the original ideas”
In this issue, we talk to the chief architect of Garden Quarters, looking back at the history and key moments of a project that took 18 years to develop and has now finally been completed. What interests us most are the transformations that the project underwent during construction, and the way the “necessary void” of public space was formed, which turned this remarkable complex into a fragment of a whole new type of urban fabric – not just at the horizontal “street” level but in its vertical structure as well.
A Unique Representative
The recently concluded year 2024 can be considered the year of completion for the “Garden Quarters” residential complex in Moscow’s Khamovniki. This project is well-known and, in many ways, iconic. Rarely does one manage to preserve such a number of original ideas, achieving in the end a kind of urban planning Gesamtkunstwerk. Here is a subjective view from an architecture journalist, with an interview with Sergey Skuratov soon to follow.
Field of Life
The new project by the architectural company PNKB (an acronym for “Design, Research, and Advisory Bureau”), led by Sergey Gnedovsky and Anton Lyubimkin, for the Kulikovo Field Museum is dedicated to the field as a concept in its own right. The field has long been a focus of the museum’s thorough and successful research. Accordingly, the exterior of the new museum building is gentler than that of its predecessor, which was also designed by PNKB and dedicated specifically to the historic battle. Inside, however, the building confidently guides the visitor from a luminous atrium along a spiral path to the field – interpreted here as a field of life.
A Paper Clip above the River
In this article, we talk with Vitaly Lutz from the Genplan Institute of Moscow about the design and unique features of the pedestrian bridge that now links the two banks of the Yauza River in the new cluster of Bauman Moscow State Technical University (MSTU). The bridge’s form and functionality – particularly the inclusion of an amphitheater suspended over the river – were conceived during the planning phase of the territory’s development. Typically, this approach is not standard practice, but the architects advocate for it, referring to this intermediate project phase as the “pre-AGR” stage (AGR stands for Architectural and Urban Planning Approval). Such a practice, they argue, helps define key parameters of future projects and bridge the gap between urban planning and architectural design.
Living in the Architecture of One’s Own Making
Do architects design houses for themselves? You bet! In this article, we are examining a new book by TATLIN publishing house. This book – unprecedented for Russia – features 52 private homes designed and built by contemporary architects for themselves. It includes houses that are famous, even iconic, as well as lesser-known ones; large and small, stylish and eccentric. To some extent, the book reflects the history of Russian architecture over the past 30 years.
A City Block Isoline
Another competition project for a residential complex on the banks of the Volga in Nizhny Novgorod has been prepared by Studio 44. A team of architects led by Ivan Kozhin concluded that using a regular block layout in such a location would be inappropriate and developed a “custom design” approach: a chain of parceled multi-section buildings stretching along the entire embankment. Let’s explore the features and advantages of this unconventional method.
Competition: The Price of Creativity?
Any day now, we’re expecting the results of a competition held by the “Samolet” development group for a plot in Kommunarka. In the meantime, we share the impressions of Editor-in-Chief Julia Tarabarina, who managed to conduct a public talk. Though technically focused on the interaction between developers and architects, the public talk turned into a discussion about the pros and cons of architectural competitions.
Terraced Design
The “River Park” residential complex has confidently and securely shaped the Nagatinsky Backwater shoreline. Featuring a public embankment, elevated courtyards connected by pedestrian bridges, and brick façades, the development invites exploration of its nuanced response to the surrounding context, as well as hints of the architects’ megalithic design thinking.
A Kremlin’s Core and Meteorite Fragments
We continue our coverage of the competition projects for the residential district that the development company GloraX plans to build along the embankment of the Rowing Channel in Nizhny Novgorod. ASADOV Architects approached the concept through a deep dive into local identity, using storytelling to pinpoint a central idea for the design: the master plan and composition are imagined as if a meteorite had struck a “proto-Kremlin”. Sounds weird? Find more details below!
The Volga Regatta
GloraX plans to develop a residential complex spanning 14 hectares along the Volga River in Nizhny Novgorod. The winning design in a closed-door competition, created by GORA Architects, features housing typologies ranging from townhouses to terraced high-rise slabs, a balance of functions, diverse ways of engaging with the water, and even a dedicated island (no less!) for the city residents.
Life Plans
The master plan for the residential district “Prityazheniye” (“Gravity”) in Naberezhnye Chelny was developed by the architectural company A.Len, taking into account the specific urban planning context and partially implemented solutions of the first phase. However, the master plan prioritized its own values: a green framework, a system of focal points, a hierarchy of spaces, and pedestrian priority. After this, the question of what residents will do in their neighborhood simply doesn’t arise.
A New Track
We took a thorough look at D_Station, a railcar repair depot dating back to 1906, recently reconstructed while preserving its century-old industrial structure, upon the project by Sergey Trukhanov and T+T Architects. Though work on the interiors – set to house restaurants and public spaces – is still underway, the building’s exterior already offers plenty to see. Visitors can explore the blend of old and new brickwork, appreciate the architect’s unique interpretation of ruin aesthetics, and enjoy the newly built pedestrian route that connects the Citydel Business Center’s arches to Kazakova Street.
Four Different Surveys
The “Explore the City” competition, organized this year by the Genplan Institute of Moscow, stands out as a pretty unconventional one for the architectural field but aligns perfectly well with the character of urban planning work. The winning project analyzed contemporary residential complexes, combining urban planning insights with a realtor’s perspective to propose a hybrid approach. Other entries explored public centers, motivations for car ownership, and housing vacancy rates. A fifth participant withdrew. Here’s a closer look at the four completed works.
Scheduled Evolution
ASADOV Architects unveiled the EvyCenter pavilion, a microcultural hub for fostering personal growth, organizing workshops, and doing gymnastics. Additionally, this pavilion serves as a prototype for a scalable country house, drawing inspiration from the “Loskutok” project, and constructed from CLT panels in a factory. This marks the beginning of a developer project initiated by the architectural firm (sic!), which is seeking partners to expand both small Evy settlements and even larger Evy cities, which are, according to Andrey Asadov, aimed at fostering the “evolutionary” development of the people who will inhabit them.
The Golden Crown
The concept for a dental clinic in Yekaterinburg, developed by CNTR Studio, revolves around the idea of a “mouth full of gold”: pristine white porcelain stoneware walls are complemented by matte brass details. To avoid an overly literal interpretation, the architects focused on the building’s proportions, skillfully navigating between sunlight requirements and fire safety regulations.
Flexibility and Integration
Not long ago, we covered the project for the fourth phase of the ÁLIA residential complex, designed by APEX. Now, we’ve been shown different fence concepts they developed to enclose the complex’s private courtyards, incorporating a variety of public functions. We believe that the sheer fact that the complex’s architects were involved in such a detail as fencing speaks volumes.
A Step Forward
The HIDE residential complex represents a major milestone for ADM architects and their leaders Andrey Romanov and Ekaterina Kuznetsova in their quest for a fresh high-rise aesthetic – one that is flexible and layered, capable of bringing vibrancy to mass and silhouette while shaping form. Over recent years, this approach has become ADM’s “signature style”, with the golden HIDE tower playing a pivotal role in its evolution. Here, we delve into the project’s story, explore the details of the complex’s design, and uncover its core essence.
Gold in the Sands
A new office for a transcontinental company specializing in resource extraction and processing has opened in Dubai. Designed by T+T Architects, masters of creating spaces that are contemporary, diverse, flexible, and original, this project exemplifies their expertise. On the executive floor, a massive brass-clad partition dominates, while layered textures of compressed earth create a contextually resonant backdrop.
Layers and Levels of Flight
This project goes way back – Reserve Union won this architectural competition at the end of 2011, and the building was completed in 2018, so it’s practically “archival”. However, despite being relatively unknown, the building can hardly be considered “dated” and remains a prime example of architectural expression, particularly in the headquarters genre. And it’s especially fitting for an aviation company office. In some ways, it resembles the Aeroflot headquarters at Sheremetyevo but with its own unique identity, following the signature style of Vladimir Plotkin. In this article, we take an in-depth look at the United Aircraft Corporation (UAC) headquarters in the Moscow agglomeration town of Zhukovsky, supplemented by recent photographs from Alexey Naroditsky – a shoot that became only recently possible due to the fact that improvements were finally made in the surrounding area.
Light and Shadow
In this article, we delve into the architectural design of the “Chaika” house by DNK ag architects, which was recently completed in 2023 as part of the collection of signature designs at ZILArt. As is well-known, all the buildings in this complex follow a design code, yet each one is distinct. This particular building stands out not only for its whiteness and minimalism but also for the refined use of a limited number of techniques that, together, create what can confidently be called synergy.
Casus Novae
A master plan was developed for a large residential area with a name of “DNS City”, but now that its implementation began, the plan has been arbitrarily reformatted and replaced with something that, while similar on the surface, is actually quite different. This is not the first time such a thing happens, but it’s always frustrating. With permission from the author, we are sharing Maria Elkina’s post.
Treasure Hunting
The GAFA bureau, in collaboration with Tegola and Arkhitail, organized an expedition to the island of Kilpola in Karelia as part of Moskomarkhitektura’s “Open City” festival. There, amidst moss and rocks, the students sought answers to questions like: what is the sacred, where does it dwell, and what sustains it? Assisting the participants in this quest were landscape engineer Evgeny Levin, artist Nicholas Roerich, a moose, and the lack of cellular connection. Here’s how the story unfolded.
Depths of the Earth, Streams of Water
In the Malaya Okhta district, the Akzent building, designed by Stepan Liphart, was constructed. It follows a classic tripartite structure, yet it’s what you might call “hand-drawn”: each façade is unique in its form and details, some of which aren’t immediately noticeable. In this article, we explore the context and, together with the architect, delve into how the form was developed.
Fir Tree Dynamics
The “Airports of Region” holding is planning to build an airport in Karachay-Cherkessia, aiming to make the Arkhyz and Dombay resorts more accessible to travelers. The project that won in an invitation-only competition, submitted by Sergey Nikeshkin’s KPLN, blends natural imagery inspired by the shape of a conifer seed, open-air waiting spaces, majestic large trees, and a green roof elevated on needle-like columns. The result is both nature-inspired and WOW.
​A Brick Shell
In the process of designing a clubhouse situated among pine trees in a prestigious suburban area near Moscow, the architectural firm “A.Len” did the façade design part. The combination of different types of brick and masonry correlates with the volumetric and plastique solutions, further enhanced by the inclusion of wood-painted fragments and metal “glazing”.
Word Forms
ATRIUM architects love ambitious challenges, and for the firm’s thirtieth anniversary, they boldly play a game of words with an exhibition that dives deep into a self-created vocabulary. They immerse their projects – especially art installations – into this glossary, as if plunging into a current of their own. You feel as if you’re flowing through the veins of pure art, immersed in a universe of vertical cities, educational spaces – of which the architects are true masters – and the cultural codes of various locations. But what truly captivates is the bold statement that Vera Butko and Anton Nadtochy make, both through their work and this exhibition: architecture, above all, is art – the art of working with form and space.
Flexibility and Acuteness of Modernity
Luxurious, fluid, large “kokoshniks” and spiral barrel columns, as if made from colorful chewing gum: there seem to be no other mansion like this in Moscow, designed in the “Neo-Russian-Modern” style. And the “Teremok” on Malaya Kaluzhskaya, previously somewhat obscure, has “come alive with new colors” and gained visibility after its restoration for the office of the “architectural ecosystem” as the architects love to call themselves. It’s evident that Julius Borisov and the architects at UNK put their hearts into finding this new office and bringing it up to date. Let’s delve into the paradoxes of this mansion’s history and its plasticity. Spoiler: two versions of modernity meet here, both balancing on the razor’s edge of “what’s current”.
Yuri Vissarionov: “A modular house does not belong to the land”
It belongs to space, or to the air... It turns out that 3D printing is more effective when combined with a modular approach: the house is built in a workshop and then adapted to the site, including on uneven terrain. Yuri Vissarionov shares his latest experience in designing tourist complexes, both in central Russia and in the south. These include houseboats, homes printed from lightweight concrete using a 3D printer, and, of course, frame houses.
​Moscow’s First
“The quality of education largely depends on the quality of the educational environment”. This principle of the last decade has been realized by Sergey Skuratov in the project for the First Moscow Gymnasium on Rostovskaya Embankment in the Khamovniki district. The building seamlessly integrates into the complex urban landscape, responding both to the pedestrian flow of the city and the quiet alleyways. It skillfully takes advantage of the height differences and aligns with modern trends in educational space design. Let’s take a closer look.