По-русски

​“Architectural Archaeology of the Narkomfin Building”: the Recap

One of the most important events of 2020 has been the completion of the long-awaited restoration of the monument of Soviet avant-garde architecture – the Narkomfin Building, the progenitor of the typology of social housing in this country. The house retained its residential function as the main one, alongside with a number of artifacts and restoration clearances turned into living museum exhibits.

Natalia Koriakovskaia

Written by:
Natalia Koriakovskaia
Translated by:
Anton Mizonov

10 December 2020
Object
mainImg
In 1986, Aleksey Ginzburg, who then worked in the studio of his father, Vladimir Ginzburg, took up the project of restoring this unique building. However, only in 2016 he was able to get down to a detailed field survey. The restoration began in March 2017. Currently, the house, the communal unit, and the laundry unit, which is also a part of the ensemble, have been fully restored. The studio apartments have been sold out; the renters for the communal building and the laundry have not yet been found. What still needs to be done is full recreation of the vertical plan of the land site itself, together with resuming the historical links that operated on the grounds of the complex: from the side of the laundry, the project by “Ginzburg Architects” provides for a ramp that will connect it to the park, with another two stairways connecting the main building to the park.

View of the communal unit and the east facade of the residential unit. Restoration and adaptaion of the the cultural heritage site “Narkomfin Building” (2017-2020)
Copyright: Photograph © Yuri Palmin / provided by Ginzburg Architects


The Architectural Atlantis

Probably, no other architectural monument has spawned as many myths as this house with the apartment of the People’s Commissar for Finances crowning its roof. When still in the making, the project was surrounded with special attention from its contemporaries, becoming a hit in the elite cultural and political circles. It was not just the residence of the artist Alexander Deineka, People’s Commissar for Finances Nikolai Milyutin, and the architect Moisei Ginzburg himself, but also the doctor Nikolai Semashko, the author Vladimir Antonov-Ovseenko, and many members of the government.
One of the main myths is that Narkomfin was a “commune” house, which does not reflect its true status. Aleksey Ginzburg cannot stress this enough that in fact it was a “communal” house, i.e. it did not consist of multi-family “communalka” flats – rather, the term “communal” referred to the communal use of the utility services. It predecessor can be considered to be the pre-revolution tenement, such as the Nirnzee House, built in 1912, in which the architect himself lived at that time. This was a type of housing with an infrastructure of its own, such as a common house kitchen, a cabaret, a movie theater, and other “conveniences”, appropriate in a “house of bachelors”. The Nirnzee House has a lot in common with American guest houses, and it’s even still contemporary in its own way, yet the Narkomfin Building was a real breakthrough. Essentially, it got as close as possible to the housing format of today, fundamentally developing the social program, which manifested itself in a special approach to organizing the public spaces and utility infrastructure, such as the laundry, the cafeteria, and the kindergarten. Everything was set up to provide the residents of the house with an opportunity to live here a harmonious and comfortable family life.

In terms of full-fledged implementation of the new life approach and the needs of the people of that epoch, the Narkomfin Building was a truly unique and groundbreaking project. It occupies a key place in the history of the Soviet avant-garde, just like the Melnikov House, which represents a fundamentally different typology of housing. Both had a tremendous influence on the entire subsequent architecture of the 20th century: on the one hand, the architect’s private house with an unusual way of life for his family, which he designed himself, on the other hand, a communal apartment building. At the same time, a vivid example of the “classic” communal house with its “military” order, which manifested itself in extreme collectivization of the most basic life functions, is the commune house on the Ordzhonikidze Street in Moscow, designed by Ivan Nikolaev, which nevertheless later on turned out to be unsustainable and was redesigned by the author himself into a student dormitory. The spectacular, yet caricatured, project demonstrated all the absurdity of the ideological extremes, with which Moisei Ginzburg polemicized in his “Dwelling” book.

  • zooming
    “Dwelling”. Moisei Ginzburg, 1934
  • zooming
    A “K”-type housing unit after restoration. Restoration and adaptaion of the the cultural heritage site “Narkomfin Building” (2017-2020)
    Copyright: Photograph © Yuri Palmin / provided by Ginzburg Architects


Due to its social determinism, the Narkomfin Building had a tremendous influence on the world’s architecture, especially on European and American housing construction. This is what I called it at one time – a socially oriented tenement.


By the end of the 1920’s, Moisei Ginzburg’s reached Europe and after the Second World War – when most of the housing stock was destroyed, and socialist governments came to power in many countries – these ideas fell on fertile ground. The legacy of the Narkomfin Building was shared by both Corbusier’s “Housing Units” and the housing architecture of the “new brutalist” period of the 1960-70’s. However, in the Soviet Russia, after the creative platforms were disbanded in the 1930’s, the principle of a commune house did not take root – they were alien to proletarian art, and the experiments on organizing “a new way of life” soon were abandoned.

The Narkomfin Building was indeed later on divided into communal flats, even though Moisei Ginzburg did foresee this and tried to make such a move impossible by designing rooms with ceilings 2.3 meters high in combination with 3.75 and 4.6 meters. Then the spaces between the supports – the “legs” – were stopped in order to get more housing space. The public infrastructure also gradually fell into decay, even though the kindergarten, the cafeteria, and the laundry still functioned for some time. Despite all of the attempts to turn the building into an average “kommunalka” house, it still looked strange. Nobody really understood what the house was intended to be. Probably, the same applied to its utility systems. This must be the reason why nobody even bothered to repair them since the day the house was built.

  • zooming
    View of the east facade of the residential building from the side of the USA Embassy before the restoration. Restoration and adaptaion of the the cultural heritage site “Narkomfin Building” (2017-2020)
    Copyright: Photograph provided by Ginzburg Architects
  • zooming
    View of the east facade of the residential building from the side of the USA Embassy after the restoration. Restoration and adaptaion of the the cultural heritage site “Narkomfin Building” (2017-2020)
    Copyright: Photograph provided by Ginzburg Architects


“Architectural Archaeology”

Aleksey Ginzburg uses the “architectural archaeology” term to describe the exciting research of the house, which accompanied the lengthy period of preparation work, field survey, and studying the sources, chief of them being the Moisei Ginzburg book “Dwelling”, which provides an accurate description of many architectural units and details of the project. He notes that it was especially important that in addition to revealing the details, the restoration experts managed to carry out full-scale measurements of valuable elements, literally taking them apart, and fix the percentage of preservation and the percentage of replacement. These elements include areas of publics use, the cells themselves, a unique system of hidden utility lines, “skylight” areaways, ventilation shafts of the terrace, the stained glass window of the communal building, flowerbeds, a system of pull-out windows, and many other components of construction and decoration.

  • zooming
    1 / 9
    The interior of the corridor. The system of pull-out windows and the cast-iron radiators were restored. Restoration and adaptaion of the the cultural heritage site “Narkomfin Building” (2017-2020)
    Copyright: Photograph © Yuri Palmin / provided by Ginzburg Architects
  • zooming
    2 / 9
    The original door handle. Restoration and adaptaion of the the cultural heritage site “Narkomfin Building” (2017-2020)
    Copyright: Photograph provided by Ginzburg Architects
  • zooming
    3 / 9
    A recreated door handle. Restoration and adaptaion of the the cultural heritage site “Narkomfin Building” (2017-2020)
    Copyright: Photograph provided by Ginzburg Architects
  • zooming
    4 / 9
    A sample of the window hardware (a clamp), original. Restoration and adaptaion of the the cultural heritage site “Narkomfin Building” (2017-2020)
    Copyright: Photograph provided by Ginzburg Architects
  • zooming
    5 / 9
    A sample of the window hardware (a clamp), recreated. Restoration and adaptaion of the the cultural heritage site “Narkomfin Building” (2017-2020)
    Copyright: Photograph provided by Ginzburg Architects
  • zooming
    6 / 9
    The entrance door of the north staircase, recreated by the original drafts. Restoration and adaptaion of the the cultural heritage site “Narkomfin Building” (2017-2020)
    Copyright: Photograph provided by Ginzburg Architects
  • zooming
    7 / 9
    Interior of the corridor, the 1930′s
    Copyright: Photograph provided by Ginzburg Architects
  • zooming
    8 / 9
    The areaways: a restored fragment. Restoration and adaptaion of the the cultural heritage site “Narkomfin Building” (2017-2020)
    Copyright: Photograph © Yuri Palmin / provided by Ginzburg Architects
  • zooming
    9 / 9
    The “skylight” areaways: a preserved sample. Restoration and adaptaion of the the cultural heritage site “Narkomfin Building” (2017-2020)
    Copyright: Photograph © Yuri Palmin / provided by Ginzburg Architects


In this sense, the project by “Ginzburg Architects” is conservational, i.e. it preserves as much as possible all of the authentic elements of the building – those that have a protected status, and those that don’t. The probes and the exhibits give an idea about where the boundary lies between the authentic and the new. This specific approach helped to ultimately preserve as much as possible of the authentic structure, which you can actually touch, instead of replacing the worn-out parts with newly made replicas.

For example, the architects were able to restore such project-stipulated details as the concrete tiles on the operated roofs – it was laid down over a metallic framework with pebble fillers – the ventilation shafts and the ventilation chambers, one of which, as is known, was turned by Milyutin into his penthouse, the parapet and the balcony railings, as well as the pergolas of the residential and the communal units, which were part of the solarium and the terrace in the original project.

  • zooming
    1 / 5
    A fragment of the restored ventilation sgaft on the operated roof. Restoration and adaptaion of the the cultural heritage site “Narkomfin Building” (2017-2020)
    Copyright: Photograph © Yuri Palmin / provided by Ginzburg Architects
  • zooming
    2 / 5
    The tile pattern on the operated roof and on the balcony of the second floor. Restoration and adaptaion of the the cultural heritage site “Narkomfin Building” (2017-2020)
    Copyright: Photograph provided by Ginzburg Architects
  • zooming
    3 / 5
    The preserved historical pavement tiles of the operated roof. Restoration and adaptaion of the the cultural heritage site “Narkomfin Building” (2017-2020)
    Copyright: Photograph provided by Ginzburg Architects
  • zooming
    4 / 5
    The ventilation shafts on the operated roof. Restoration and adaptaion of the the cultural heritage site “Narkomfin Building” (2017-2020)
    Copyright © Ginzburg Architects
  • zooming
    5 / 5
    The recreated parapet on the operated roof. Restoration and adaptaion of the the cultural heritage site “Narkomfin Building” (2017-2020)
    Copyright: Photograph provided by Ginzburg Architects


Another thing that got restored was the original plan of the communal unit – the architects had to clear it from later addition and restore its historical image.

  • zooming
    The stained glass window of the communal unit after the restoration. Restoration and adaptaion of the the cultural heritage site “Narkomfin Building” (2017-2020)
    Copyright: Photograph © Yuri Palmin / provided by Ginzburg Architects
  • zooming
    The stained glass wall before the resoration. Restoration and adaptaion of the the cultural heritage site “Narkomfin Building” (2017-2020)
    Copyright: Photograph provided by Ginzburg Architects


Today, we can see the single volume of the unit with a stained glass wall and the attic part, which can be seen from any given point in the interior, and from the outside as well.

The interior of the third floor of the communal unit. Restoration and adaptaion of the the cultural heritage site “Narkomfin Building” (2017-2020)
Copyright: Photograph © Yuri Palmin / provided by Ginzburg Architects


Contemporary in All Senses

Although Aleksey Ginzburg has been studying this building since the 1980’s, he got a detailed idea of how it was made only during the actual restoration work. A lot of things were discovered for the first time, some of them being truly amazing. The building technologies were totally revolutionary by the standards of those days.

As we already wrote, one of the coauthors of the building was considered to be the engineer Sergey Prokhorov – it was him who developed the technology part of the project. What was fundamentally innovative about it? First of all, it was a three-layer façade that essentially was like a curious “pie”. The wall blocks did not have insulation, and the structure of the outer wall masonry itself consisted of multi-slot blocks with voids and filling with slag between a concrete stone block of the “Krestyanin” (“Peasant”) type and a half of such a stone and, thus, was a warm structure. Sometimes, the role of the insulating material was played by “Kamyshit” – a kind of reed fiber-board material – but only for the framework elements that showed on the façade and the roof of the overpass between the building and the communal unit.

The multi-slot “Peasant” block and its modern analogue. Restoration and adaptaion of the the cultural heritage site “Narkomfin Building” (2017-2020)
Copyright: Photograph provided by Ginzburg Architects


Sergey Prokhorov also designed a unique system of hidden utility lines. Its idea was that the partitions between the rooms and the monolith intermediate floors were composed of blocks with two hollows – the special concrete blocks that were custom-designed by Sergey Prokhorov. All the utility lines were routed inside the vertical channels that were formed in the walls. Preserving the original system during the restoration significantly complicated the process, but for “Ginzburg Architects” it was a point of honor. The utility lines were ultimately replaced and laid exactly along the original routes.

One must say that in recreating the authentic technologies Aleksey Ginzburg never once never departed from the “primary source”. For example, in the course of restoration the architects recreated the “industrial” construction method that consisted in manufacturing the building materials directly on the construction site. This applied for the porous concrete blocks – the modern analogues of Sergey Prokhorov’s wall blocks – as well as for the concrete frames for the array of the windows of the east façade, the stained glass windows of the staircase and the elevator shafts, and the areaways.

  • zooming
    Recreation of Prokhorov blocks on the construction site in accordance with the original technology. Restoration and adaptaion of the the cultural heritage site “Narkomfin Building” (2017-2020)
    Copyright: Photograph provided by Ginzburg Architects
  • zooming
    The masonry of the external walls from the “Peasant” blocks. Restoration and adaptaion of the the cultural heritage site “Narkomfin Building” (2017-2020)
    Copyright © Ginzburg Architects


Experimenting with Materials

The experiments that Moisei Ginzburg and Sergey Prokhorov did with building materials were not limited just to the concrete blocks and reed fiber board. In actuality, the Narkomfin Building construction site became a veritable laboratory for working with new textures. For example, the floors in the residential units and on the stairs were poured from xylolite – an artificial stone made from sawdust, which is also called “warm concrete”. Pleasant to the touch and, as we would say today, “ergonomic”, xylolite was also used for many tactile surfaces of the building, such as railings. In the process of restoration, the architects were able to restore the xylolite stairs inside the apartments – what was used as a filler was wooden sawdust, mainly oak. At the same time, the floor coverage in the public areas was not restored but recreated: what was used as filler was quartz sand, but the technology of producing it using magnesium-based binding substance is original.

  • zooming
    The recreated coverage of the corridors and the stairs of the northern stairway, performed using the magnesium-based binding substance true to the original. Restoration and adaptaion of the the cultural heritage site “Narkomfin Building” (2017-2
    Copyright: Photograph © Yuri Palmin / provided by Ginzburg Architects
  • zooming
    The recreated coverage of the corridors and the stairs of the northern stairway, performed using the magnesium-based binding substance true to the original. Restoration and adaptaion of the the cultural heritage site “Narkomfin Building” (2017-2
    Copyright: Photograph © Yuri Palmin / provided by Ginzburg Architects


The interior of the living room with a kitche area an “F”-type cell. The stair coverage is made of xylolite with sawdust used as filler. Restoration and adaptaion of the the cultural heritage site “Narkomfin Building” (2017-2020)
Copyright: Photograph © Yuri Palmin / provided by Ginzburg Architects


The partition walls were originally made from fiber boards. To recreate them, the restoration experts selected the material that would allow them to manufacture the partition walls of comparatively small apartments without distorting the historically correct geometry. Currently, they are made from Ytong aerated concrete blocks 60 mm thick. The total thickness of the original fiber board wall partitions and the newly-made partitions with decoration turned out to be identical – 80 mm.

The crowning highlight of the interior design is the wiring – in the public areas it is exposed; routed in accordance with the historical photos. The architects attempted to recreate the historical environment of the house after the installation of brass elements: overhead junction boxes, exposed wiring and replicas of historic lamps with a brass base.

The recreated system of exposed wiring. Restoration and adaptaion of the the cultural heritage site “Narkomfin Building” (2017-2020)
Copyright: Photograph provided by Ginzburg Architects


340 Probes

As is known, for organizing the interior space of the building and solving such problems as the perception of the interiors of the small-sized apartments or the ease of orientation inside public spaces, Moisei Ginzburg, with the participation of Ginerk Scheper and Erich Borchert, developed color charts, implementing color techniques, which today we would call “color navigation”. It included the color solutions of the stairwell ceilings, corridors, and joint doors to the “F”-type apartments. More in-depth studies on the effects of color on humans during long-term exposures were carried out when working with the cell coloration. Moses Ginzburg described the results of his experiments on color research in detail in the chapter “Space, Light and Color” in his book “Dwelling”.

In the course of the restoration work, we conducted a technological survey, performing a total of 340 probes aimed at defining the original colors of various surfaces of the interiors and facades, as well as all architectural elements and details. As a result of the field survey analysis, we came up with color charts of all the surfaces of the Narkomfin Building.


Thus, as a result of the restoration work the architects fully recreated the historical concept of color solution of the public areas; on the staircases, in the corridors, in the lobbies of the north entrance, and in the 15 units of the following types: “F”-type – apartments 20, 21, 25, 26, 27, 29, 31, 38, “K”-type – apartments 5, 18; “2F” – apartment 46; “P”-type, Milyutin apartment #49, and in the former dormitory – apartments 50/52.

  • zooming
    1 / 5
    Disclosure of paint layers on the column in cell P. Restoration and adaptaion of the the cultural heritage site “Narkomfin Building” (2017-2020)
    Copyright: Photograph provided by Ginzburg Architects
  • zooming
    2 / 5
    Color scheme of Cell #5. Restoration and adaptaion of the the cultural heritage site “Narkomfin Building” (2017-2020)
    Copyright: Photograph provided by Ginzburg Architects
  • zooming
    3 / 5
    The east wall in the 3rd floor of the communal unit: work on defining the time of applying the layers of paint, and their formula. Restoration and adaptaion of the the cultural heritage site “Narkomfin Building” (2017-2020)
    Copyright: Photograph provided by Ginzburg Architects
  • zooming
    4 / 5
    The recreated color solution of the interiors of the third floor of the communal unit. The newly painted elements are lighter in tone. Restoration and adaptaion of the the cultural heritage site “Narkomfin Building” (2017-2020)
    Copyright: Photograph © Yuri Palmin / provided by Ginzburg Architects
  • zooming
    5 / 5
    A fragment of the east facade; the recreated color solution of the facade wall and the columns. Restoration and adaptaion of the the cultural heritage site “Narkomfin Building” (2017-2020)
    Copyright: Photograph © Yuri Palmin / provided by Ginzburg Architects


The best-preserved fragments of the custom-designed decoration were conserved in the interiors as “probes”, located in the communal unit, on the stair of the residential buildings, and in Unit P.

  • zooming
    The recreated color solution of the staircases. Restoration and adaptaion of the the cultural heritage site “Narkomfin Building” (2017-2020)
    Copyright: Photograph © Yuri Palmin / provided by Ginzburg Architects
  • zooming
    The recreated color solution of the stairwells. Restoration and adaptaion of the the cultural heritage site “Narkomfin Building” (2017-2020)
    Copyright: Photograph © Yuri Palmin / provided by Ginzburg Architects


Living in a Monument

Living within the walls of the architectural monument, of course, imposes certain protective obligations on the owners regarding the operation of residential premises. In accordance with the rules issued by the Department for Cultural Legacy, the owners of the building must sign the report on mechanical condition, which stipulates their obligations in respect to this monument. On the other hand, Ginzburg Architects, acting in collaboration with the developer company “League of Rights” were able, as part of adjusting the monument of architecture to the new residential function, to implement a system, where the apartments were sold with ready-made decoration and appliances, which sometimes even addressed the apartment owners’ (who bought the apartments still during the restoration process) minor requirements, such as the location of electric sockets, so as to make sure that residents will not want to make any changes to the apartments later on. According to Aleksey Ginzburg, such economic leverage is just as effective as the legal kind.

Meanwhile, the very fact of completing such a milestone project, the restoration of which stretched for more than three decades, may become a hope-inspiring precedent for dozens other avant-garde monuments, whose restoration is put off – or, worse, is declared to be “impossible” – for this or that reason. For example, one of the main reasons for NOT restoring the so-called “working settlements” is the prohibitively low density of the resulting housing construction.

However, Aleksey Ginzburg is positive that even the questions of feasibility of such projects can be solved without destroying the historical environment, the way it happened, for example, to the historical constructivist compounds “Pogodinskaya” or “Rusakovka”. In actuality, social determinism, which is characteristic for such avant-garde projects, is totally contemporary and is massively used in today’s planning of living environment. Houses, built at the dawn of the industrial epoch, are still fit for “modern lifestyle”, and, if operated correctly, embody quite comprehensible and healthy principles of a comfortable environment. Many of them today are postulated as the benchmarks for modern housing and are the indexes of the quality and relevance of new architectural solutions.

10 December 2020

Natalia Koriakovskaia

Written by:

Natalia Koriakovskaia
Translated by:
Anton Mizonov
Headlines now
New “Flight”
Architects from “Mezonproject” have developed a project for the reconstruction of the regional youth center “Polyot”(“Flight”) in the city of Oryol. The summer youth center, built back in the late 1970s, will now become year-round and acquire many additional functions.
The Yauza Towers
In Moscow, there aren’t that many buildings or projects designed by Nikita Yavein and Studio 44. In this article, we present to you the concept of a large multifunctional complex on the Yauza River, located between two parks, featuring a promenade, a crossroads of two pedestrian streets, a highly developed public space, and an original architectural solution. This solution combines a sophisticated, asymmetric façade grid, reminiscent of a game of fifteen puzzle, and bold protrusions of the upper parts of the buildings, completely masking the technical floors and sculpting the complex’s silhouette.
Architecture and Leisure Park
For the suburban hotel complex, which envisages various formats of leisure, the architectural company T+T Architects proposed several types of accommodation, ranging from the classic “standard” in a common building to a “cave in the hill” and a “house in a tree”. An additional challenge consisted in integrating a few classic-style residences already existing on this territory into the “architectural forest park”.
The U-House
The Jois complex combines height with terraces, bringing the most expensive apartments from penthouses down to the bottom floors. The powerful iconic image of the U-shaped building is the result of the creative search for a new standard of living in high-rise buildings by the architects of “Genpro”.
Black and White
In this article, we specifically discuss the interiors of the ATOM Pavilion at VDNKh. Interior design is a crucial component of the overall concept in this case, and precision and meticulous execution were highly important for the architects. Julia Tryaskina, head of UNK interiors, shares some of the developments.
The “Snake” Mountain
The competition project for the seaside resort complex “Serpentine” combines several typologies: apartments of different classes, villas, and hotel rooms. For each of these typologies, the KPLN architects employ one of the images that are drawn from the natural environment – a serpentine road, a mountain stream, and rolling waves.
Opal from Anna Mons’ Ring
The project of a small business center located near Tupolev Plaza and Radio Street proclaims the necessity of modern architecture in a specific area of Moscow commonly known as “Nemetskaya Sloboda” or “German settlement”. It substantiates its thesis with the thoroughness of details, a multitude of proposed and rejected form variants, and even a detailed description of the surrounding area. The project is interesting indeed, and it is even more interesting to see what will come of it.
Feed ’Em All
A “House of Russian Cuisine” was designed and built by KROST Group at VDNKh for the “Rossiya” exhibition in record-breaking time. The pavilion is masterfully constructed in terms of the standards of modern public catering industry multiplied by the bustling cultural program of the exhibition, and it interprets the stylistically diverse character of VDNKh just as successfully. At the same time, much of its interior design can be traced back to the prototypes of the 1960s – so much so that even scenes from iconic Soviet movies of those years persistently come to mind.
The Ensemble at the Mosque
OSA prepared a master plan for a district in the southern part of Derbent. The main task of the master plan is to initiate the formation of a modern comfortable environment in this city. The organization of residential areas is subordinated to the city’s spiritual center: depending on the location relative to the cathedral mosque, the houses are distinguished by façade and plastique solutions. The program also includes a “hospitality center”, administrative buildings, an educational cluster, and even an air bridge.
Pargolovo Protestantism
A Protestant church is being built in St. Petersburg by the project of SLOI architects. One of the main features of the building is a wooden roof with 25-meter spans, which, among other things, forms the interior of the prayer hall. Also, there are other interesting details – we are telling you more about them.
The Shape of the Inconceivable
The ATOM Pavilion at VDNKh brings to mind a famous maxim of all architects and critics: “You’ve come up with it? Now build it!” You rarely see such a selfless immersion in implementation of the project, and the formidable structural and engineering tasks set by UNK architects to themselves are presented here as an integral and important part of the architectural idea. The challenge matches the obliging status of the place – after all, it is an “exhibition of achievements”, and the pavilion is dedicated to the nuclear energy industry. Let’s take a closer look: from the outside, from the inside, and from the underside too.
​Rays of the Desert
A school for 1750 students is going to be built in Dubai, designed by IND Architects. The architects took into account the local specifics, and proposed a radial layout and spaces, in which the children will be comfortable throughout the day.
The Dairy Theme
The concept of an office of a cheese-making company, designed for the enclosed area of a dairy factory, at least partially refers to industrial architecture. Perhaps that is why this concept is very simple, which seems the appropriate thing to do here. The building is enlivened by literally a couple of “master strokes”: the turning of the corner accentuates the entrance, and the shade of glass responds to the theme of “milk rivers” from Russian fairy tales.
The Road to the Temple
Under a grant from the Small Towns Competition, the main street and temple area of the village of Nikolo-Berezovka near Neftekamsk has been improved. A consortium of APRELarchitects and Novaya Zemlya is turning the village into an open-air museum and integrating ruined buildings into public life.
​Towers Leaning Towards the Sun
The three towers of the residential complex “Novodanilovskaya 8” are new and the tallest neighbors of the Danilovsky Manufactory, “Fort”, and “Plaza”, complementing a whole cluster of modern buildings designed by renowned masters. At the same time, the towers are unique for this setting – they are residential, they are the tallest ones here, and they are located on a challenging site. In this article, we explore how architects Andrey Romanov and Ekaterina Kuznetsova tackled this far-from-trivial task.
In the spirit of ROSTA posters
The new Rostselmash tractor factory, conceptualized by ASADOV Architects, is currently being completed in Rostov-on-Don. References to the Soviet architecture of the 1920’s and 1960’s resonate with the mission and strategic importance of the enterprise, and are also in line with the client’s wish: to pay homage to Rostov’s constructivism.
The Northern Thebaid
The central part of Ferapontovo village, adjacent to the famous monastery with frescoes by Dionisy, has been improved according to the project by APRELarchitects. Now the place offers basic services for tourists, as well as a place for the villagers’ leisure.
Brilliant Production
The architects from London-based MOST Architecture have designed the space for the high-tech production of Charge Cars, a high-performance production facility for high-speed electric cars that are assembled in the shell of legendary Ford Mustangs. The founders of both the company and the car assembly startup are Russians who were educated in their home country.
Three-Part Task: St. Petersburg’s Mytny Dvor
The so-called “Mytny Dvor” area lying just behind Moscow Railway Station – the market rows with a complex history – will be transformed into a premium residential complex by Studio 44. The project consists of three parts: the restoration of historical buildings, the reconstruction of the lost part of the historical contour, and new houses. All of them are harmonized with each other and with the city; axes and “beams of light” were found, cozy corners and scenic viewpoints were carefully thought out. We had a chat with the authors of the historical buildings’ restoration project, and we are telling you about all the different tasks that have been solved here.
The Color of the City, or Reflections on the Slope of an Urban Settlement
In 2022, Ostozhenka Architects won a competition, and in 2023, they developed and received all the necessary approvals for a master plan for the development of Chernigovskaya Street for the developer GloraX. The project takes into account a 10-year history of previous developments; it was done in collaboration with architects from Nizhny Novgorod, and it continues to evolve now. We carefully examined it, talked to everyone, and learned a lot of interesting things.
A Single-Industry Town
Kola MMC and Nornickel are building a residential neighborhood in Monchegorsk for their future employees. It is based on a project by an international team that won the 2021 competition. The project offers a number of solutions meant to combat the main “demons” of any northern city: wind, grayness and boredom.
A New Age Portico
At the beginning of the year, Novosibirsk Tolmachevo Airport opened Terminal C. The large-scale and transparent entrance hall with luminous columns inside successfully combines laconism with a bright and photogenic WOW-effect. The terminal is both the new façade of the whole complex and the starting point of the planned reconstruction, upon completion of which Tolmachevo will become the largest regional airport in Russia. In this article, we are examining the building in the context of modernist prototypes of both Novosibirsk and Leningrad: like puzzle pieces, they come together to form their individual history, not devoid of curious nuances and details.
A New Starting Point
We’ve been wanting to examine the RuArts Foundation space, designed by ATRIUM for quite a long time, and we finally got round to it. This building looks appropriate and impressive; it amazingly combines tradition – represented in our case by galleries – and innovation. In this article, we delve into details and study the building’s historical background as well.
Molding Perspectives
Stepan Liphart introduces “schematic Art Deco” on the outskirts of Kazan – his houses are executed in green color, with a glassy “iced” finish on the facades. The main merits of the project lie in his meticulous arrangement of viewing angles – the architect is striving to create in a challenging environment the embryo of a city not only in terms of pedestrian accessibility but also in a sculptural sense. He works with silhouettes, proposing intriguing triangular terraces. The entire project is structured like a crystal, following two grids, orthogonal and diagonal. In this article, we are examining what worked, and what eventually didn’t.
An Educational Experiment for the North
City-Arch continues to work on the projects that can be termed as “experimental public preschools”: private kindergartens and schools can envy such facilities in many respects. This time around, the project is done for the city of Gubkinsky, Yamalo-Nenets Autonomous District. A diverse educational and play environment, including a winter garden, awaits future students, while the teachers will have abundant opportunities to implement new practices.
Alexandra Kuzmina: “Working is easy when the rules are the same for everyone”
The subject matter of Moscow Region’s booth and presentations at Zodchestvo Festival was the concept of “Integrated Land Development”, and for a good reason: this task is very challenging, very relevant, and Moscow Region has already accumulated quite a formidable experience in this regard. In this article, we are speaking to the main architect of the region: about master plans and who makes them, about where you obtain resources for creating a comfortable environment, about her favorite projects, about why there are so few good architects, and what we should do with the bad ones.
The Cemetery: Inside and Outside
The workshop organized by the Genplan Institute of Moscow scored one of the two first places at the “Open City” festival. Its subject is reorganization of municipal cemeteries. Two action plans were proposed, diametrically opposite: one for the downtown and one for the suburbs.
Our Everything
Who is Alexey Shchusev? In the last couple of weeks, since the architect’s 150th birthday, different individuals have answered this question differently. The most detailed, illustrated, and elegantly presented response is an exhibition held in two buildings of the Museum of Architecture on Vozdvizhenka. Four curators, a year and a half of work performed by the entire museum, and exhibition design by Sergey Tchoban and Alexandra Sheiner – in this article, we take you on a tour of the exhibition and show what’s what in it.
For Mental Reboot
At the architectural competition held in 2023 in Novosibirsk, the project by GORA Architects – a pedestrian bridge leading to the town of Bor – was awarded the “Golden Capital” prize. In this country, more than a hundred pedestrian bridges are constructed each year. What makes the Bor bridge different?
Gold Embroidery
A five-story housing complex designed by Stepan Liphart in Kazan, responds to the stylistically diverse context with its form, both integral and agile, and as for the vicinity of the “Ekiyat” movie theater, the complex responds to it with a semblance of theater curtain folds, and active plastique of its balconies, that bear some resemblance to theater boxes. Even if excessively pompous a little bit, the complex does look fresh and modern. One will have a hard time finding Art Deco elements in it, even though the spirit of the 1930s, run through the filter of neo-modernism, is still clearly felt, just as a twist of the Occident.