По-русски

​Cape of Good Hope

In this issue, we are showing all the seven projects that participated in a closed-door competition to create a concept for the headquarters of Gazprom Neft, as well as provide expert opinions on those projects.

13 May 2020
mainImg
In March, the results of a competition for the best concept for the development of the Okhta Cape were announced. Previously, Gazprom Neft planned to build the highest tower in Europe here, and now it intends to place its headquarters on the cape. The competition involved seven architectural companies, four foreign ones reaching the final, the Nikken Sekkei project coming out the winner.

Below, we publish all the seven projects that participated in the competition.

***

Nikken Sekkei. The winner

The Japanese architects were inspired by the sea glory of St. Petersburg and the segment of history when shipyards were located on the Okhta Cape: in the winners’ version, the headquarters resembles two ships swaying on the waves – mother and child, as they were fondly called by Fadi Jabri, Nikki Sekkei CEO, in excellent Russian during a presentation on RBC.

According to the client, the functions of the buildings are still being discussed; there will probably be no clear separation into “office” and “public” buildings. Inside, they will create a cozy space protected from the weather with hanging gardens, water cascades and an object called the Faberge Egg, which looks like a house in a tree. The smaller building is connected to the larger one with a concave roof bearing a sightseeing platform. The negative space between these two forms a frame, inside of which the Smolny Cathedral is “exposed”.

  • zooming
    1 / 4
    Concept of developing the territory of the Okhta Cape.
    Copyright: The image provided by the Gazprom Neft press service © Nikken Sekkei
  • zooming
    2 / 4
    Concept of developing the territory of the Okhta Cape.
    Copyright: © Nikken Sekkei / provided by RBC St. Petersburg
  • zooming
    3 / 4
    Concept of developing the territory of the Okhta Cape.
    Copyright: © Nikken Sekkei / provided by RBC St. Petersburg
  • zooming
    4 / 4
    Concept of developing the territory of the Okhta Cape.
    Copyright: The image provided by the Gazprom Neft press service © Nikken Sekkei


Critics of the project note the pragmatism and neutrality of the solution presented by the architects, the lack of intrigue and relative difficulty of implementation. The glass facade is not exactly environmentally friendly, and, in addition, it brings about the phenomenon of pseudo-transparency: despite the “crystal” walls, the building looks monolithic and not really welcoming. Also, there is no clarity about what will be done with the archaeological finds.

More about the project ->



MVRDV. A finalist

Judging by what is written in the information field, this project has been the greatest hit with the public. The sectional volume of the office building, the composition of which resembles the abstractions of Vasily Kandinsky, rests on 119 columns, between which trees grow. According to the project, this “forest”, along with the green roof with its lush vegetation, was to be made fully accessible to the city people.

The goals of the Dutch company are quite ambitious: to build the largest wooden building in the world, revive the ecosystem, create a smart work environment, link many contextual threads, from the marshes and the Nyenschanz Fortress to the baroque and Soviet architectural heritage of this area. The latest green technologies provide a “clean” operation of the building.

  • zooming
    1 / 8
    Concept of developing the territory of the Okhta Cape.
    Copyright: © MVRDV
  • zooming
    2 / 8
    The corner view. Concept of developing the territory of the Okhta Cape.
    Copyright: © MVRDV
  • zooming
    3 / 8
    The winter view. Concept of developing the territory of the Okhta Cape.
    Copyright: © MVRDV
  • zooming
    4 / 8
    View of the roofs. Concept of developing the territory of the Okhta Cape.
    Copyright: © Mir
  • zooming
    5 / 8
    The gallery. Concept of developing the territory of the Okhta Cape.
    Copyright: © MVRDV
  • zooming
    6 / 8
    The interior. Concept of developing the territory of the Okhta Cape.
    Copyright: © MVRDV
  • zooming
    7 / 8
    The park. Concept of developing the territory of the Okhta cape.
    Copyright: © MVRDV
  • zooming
    8 / 8
    The roof. Concept of developing the territory of the Okhta Cape.
    Copyright: © MVRDV


The project is exciting and intriguing. However, after reading the accompanying “manifesto” note, you can see why it fell short of scoring the first place. “Gazprom – says Winy Maas – is among the world’s top three companies in terms of carbon emissions, and our company is radically committed to sustainable design.” To solve this moral dilemma, the architects came up with a headquarters design that is merged with the landscape, which does not harm the environment and does not use fossil fuel for its support, at the same time doing quite the opposite, i.e. purifying the air of carbon dioxide.

Implementing such a project, which does not make a direct statement about the power of the oil corporation, and is in many ways useful for the city, would really be a favorable compromise. However, there are alternative opinions as well. For example, Yevgeny Gerasimov considers the project to be supercilious and argues: one, the trees on the roofs and under the buildings do not grow in our climate, two, blocking the view of the bridge evidences that the architects fail to grasp the fundamentals of urban planning, and, if you remove the greenery, then there will remain a random pile of cubes – and random shapes is something that is totally incompatible with St. Petersburg. This point of view only confirms the need to discuss the future of the cape openly and with the involvement of professionals and the urban community.

More about the project ->

  • zooming
    1 / 7
    Master plan of the 1st floor. Concept of developing the territory of the Okhta Cape.
    Copyright: © MVRDV
  • zooming
    2 / 7
    Master plan of the roof. Concept of developing the territory of the Okhta Cape.
    Copyright: © MVRDV
  • zooming
    3 / 7
    The steps for developing the park and the building. Concept of developing the territory of the Okhta Cape.
    Copyright: © MVRDV
  • zooming
    4 / 7
    The original vision. Concept of developing the territory of the Okhta Cape.
    Copyright: © MVRDV
  • zooming
    5 / 7
    The office level
    Copyright: © MVRDV
  • zooming
    6 / 7
    The wooden structure. Concept of developing the territory of the Okhta Cape.
    Copyright: © MVRDV
  • zooming
    7 / 7
    The section view. Concept of developing the territory of the Okhta Cape.
    Copyright: © MVRDV



Valode&Pistre. A finalist

At a glance, the project proposed by the French architectural company surprises with the deliberate design that arises from the contrast between the acute angle and the wavy façade – when viewed from above, the building resembles a segment carved from a giant rectangular block. The contrast, as follows from the explanatory note, reflects the different nature of the Neva and Okhta rivers, the merger of which is another semantic load of the site. From the side of Okhta, the facade is more or less monotonous and calm, like the water of a small river. From the Neva side, there are expressive waves, the bends of which frame the areas with the archaeological finds.

Extensive horizontal facades are a tribute to the continuous development of St. Petersburg embankments. And on the “wave” that goes to the Neva, thanks to the glass curves and the play of reflexes, a vertical rhythm is created that echoes the regular rhythm of the colonnades of the historical buildings. According to the authors, the light and color effects are reminiscent of the colors of Russian Baroque architecture, characteristic of St. Petersburg.

More about the project ->

  • zooming
    1 / 6
    Concept of developing the territory of the Okhta Cape.
    Copyright: © Valode & Pistre
  • zooming
    2 / 6
    Concept of developing the territory of the Okhta Cape.
    Copyright: © Valode & Pistre
  • zooming
    3 / 6
    Concept of developing the territory of the Okhta Cape.
    Copyright: © Valode & Pistre
  • zooming
    4 / 6
    Concept of developing the territory of the Okhta Cape.
    Copyright: © Valode & Pistre
  • zooming
    5 / 6
    Concept of developing the territory of the Okhta Cape.
    Copyright: © Valode & Pistre
  • zooming
    6 / 6
    Concept of developing the territory of the Okhta Cape.
    Copyright: © Valode & Pistre



UNStudio. A finalist

In this concept, just like in the winner’s, the building consists of two units. These two units are linked by a large “corridor” atrium, which serves as the main entrance and the main public space. The atrium commands a view of the Smolny Cathedral and connects the city with the embankment, at the same time offering venues for exhibitions, events and recreation not only for the city people, but also for company employees. For the latter, comfortable working conditions are created: state-of-the-art climate systems, natural light, co-working and recreational areas, as well as an abundance of vegetation in the interior and in the surrounding areas.

The composition is inspired by a pointed plan of the Nienschanz Fortress, the complex glass facades being meant to resemble the edges of a gem enclosed in a pristine frame. The inclined volumes not only create an expressive sculptural surface, but also protect the premises from direct sunlight and overheating. Reflections allow the facade to change depending on the weather and time of day, just like the Neva does.

More about the project ->

  • zooming
    1 / 6
    Concept of developing the territory of the Okhta Cape.
    Copyright: © UNStudio
  • zooming
    2 / 6
    Concept of developing the territory of the Okhta Cape.
    Copyright: © UNStudio
  • zooming
    3 / 6
    Concept of developing the territory of the Okhta Cape.
    Copyright: © UNStudio
  • zooming
    4 / 6
    Concept of developing the territory of the Okhta Cape.
    Copyright: © UNStudio
  • zooming
    5 / 6
    Concept of developing the territory of the Okhta Cape.
    Copyright: © UNStudio
  • zooming
    6 / 6
    Concept of developing the territory of the Okhta Cape.
    Copyright: © Valode & Pistre


Next, we show the projects that participated in the competition, but did not reach the final.

Sergey Skuratov architects

The concept proposed by Sergei Skuratov looks to be the most thought-out one. The company’s website has a lot of pictures and explanations, according to which the symbolic building resembles a neuron with axon and dendrite rays, “a star, a message, and a signal, a radiance, a flash of energy”. The concave facades pick up the St. Petersburg theme of the semicircle, “modifying the initial plan of Voronikhin with two colonnades for the Kazan Cathedral, which was never to be implemented.” Five skylights of various shapes, like bursts on the surface of water, are placed on a flat greened operated roof.

The internal spaces should create an illusion that the city is really far away – for this, the authors of the project suggest using decorative plants and crops, which they plan to water with rainwater. The active dynamic facade is able to regulate heat transfer with the external environment.

More about the project ->

  • zooming
    1 / 6
    Concept of developing the territory of the Okhta Cape.
    Copyright: © Sergey Skuratov ARCHITECTS
  • zooming
    2 / 6
    View from the Okhta embankment of the Smolny Cathedral. Concept of developing the territory of the Okhta Cape.
    Copyright: © Sergey Skuratov ARCHITECTS
  • zooming
    3 / 6
    The main entrance to the complex from the side of the Kranogvardeiskaya Square. Concept of developing the territory of the Okhta Cape.
    Copyright: © Sergey Skuratov ARCHITECTS
  • zooming
    4 / 6
    The roof. View of the Smolny Cathedral. Concept of developing the territory of the Okhta Cape.
    Copyright: © Sergey Skuratov ARCHITECTS
  • zooming
    5 / 6
    The main atrium. View of the amphitheater from the bar. Concept of developing the territory of the Okhta Cape.
    Copyright: © Sergey Skuratov ARCHITECTS
  • zooming
    6 / 6
    The mater plan. Concept of developing the territory of the Okhta Cape.
    Copyright: © Sergey Skuratov ARCHITECTS


KOSMOS

The project presented by Kosmos bureau is similar to the MVRDV project in terms of creating a fractional and welcoming building. The Moscow architects, just like the Dutch ones, were inspired, among other things, by the courtyards and roofs of St. Petersburg.

The dense volume of the office building is cut through by courtyards integrated into one system, each with its own atmosphere and landscape. The central courtyard can be closed with sliding doors and turned into a concert hall or an exhibition area. The main public space is located on the roof and is comparable in scale to the Palace Square or the Champ de Mars. In this project, the park, which the authors proposed to make available to city people around the clock, commands views of the Smolny Cathedral and the Neva. In it, the architects placed an amphitheater, a jogging trail, a cafe, co-working spaces, and a mini-football field with spectator seats.

More about the project ->

  • zooming
    1 / 3
    Concept of developing the territory of the Okhta Cape.
    Copyright: © Kosmos Architects
  • zooming
    2 / 3
    Concept of developing the territory of the Okhta Cape.
    Copyright: © Kosmos Architects
  • zooming
    3 / 3
    The main courtyard. Concept of developing the territory of the Okhta Cape.
    Copyright: © Kosmos Architects



ABD Architects in consortium with Ingenhoven Architects

Again, a “mono-building”. It is turned to the embankment with four terraced units, between which three areas are formed, and towards the city with a continuous semicircle of the facade. The multi-level “well” atriums host pine trees and other large trees. The building is covered by a transparent roof that lets in plenty of natural light. “The image of the building is an innovative interpretation of the Neva embankments,” the ABD website says.

More about the project ->

  • zooming
    1 / 5
    Concept of developing the territory of the Okhta Cape.
    Copyright: © ABD architects
  • zooming
    2 / 5
    Concept of developing the territory of the Okhta Cape.
    Copyright: © ABD architects
  • zooming
    3 / 5
    Concept of developing the territory of the Okhta Cape.
    Copyright: © ABD architects
  • zooming
    4 / 5
    Concept of developing the territory of the Okhta Cape.
    Copyright: © ABD architects
  • zooming
    5 / 5
    Concept of developing the territory of the Okhta Cape.
    Copyright: © ABD architects


***

The Okhta Cape is a territory as important for St. Petersburg as the Tuchkov Buyan, which has been talked about for the whole past year. Archaeologists have found here the remains of the Swedish fortress Nyenschanz, the Smolny Cathedral is situated nearby, the Neva, the Bolsheokhtinsky bridge are also factors to consider, and all around there is a slurred urban situation: the place is loaded with vehicles and has not been connected with the city for many years.

Taking advantage of the quarantine lull, the St. Petersburg public draws attention to the closed-door competition in the hope of revising its results.

Architectural critic Maria Elkina launched a petition requesting a more successful project that could become a “compromise between the interests of the city and Gazprom Neft.” “My petition is ultimately not for a specific project or even for a public discussion for its own sake – it is for revising the agenda around the Okhtinsky Cape and everything that is being built in St. Petersburg,” Maria explained on her Facebook page. Currently, the petition has been signed by more than 2800 people.

Some time ago, RBC organized an online conference: joining it is interesting if only to look at experts in a “home” setting – the chief architect Vladimir Grigoryev, for example, spoke with the support of portraits of Vladimir Putin and Alexander Beglov, while the president of the local Union of Architects, Oleg Romanov – from his hunting lodge. Following the results of the conversation, they formulated advice for the client: to look for an intriguing rather than practical architectural solution, to think over a program of public space and traffic flows, to take into account the complex context of the place – with its archaeological values, Soviet heritage and other “baggage”. Vladimir Grigoryev did not rule out the possibility that the project would be considered by the city council.




***

Artem Kitaev, one of the founders and partners of Kosmos bureau, shared with us about the competition procedure and specifications.

13 May 2020

Headlines now
Living in the Architecture of One’s Own Making
Do architects design houses for themselves? You bet! In this article, we are examining a new book by TATLIN publishing house. This book – unprecedented for Russia – features 52 private homes designed and built by contemporary architects for themselves. It includes houses that are famous, even iconic, as well as lesser-known ones; large and small, stylish and eccentric. To some extent, the book reflects the history of Russian architecture over the past 30 years.
A City Block Isoline
Another competition project for a residential complex on the banks of the Volga in Nizhny Novgorod has been prepared by Studio 44. A team of architects led by Ivan Kozhin concluded that using a regular block layout in such a location would be inappropriate and developed a “custom design” approach: a chain of parceled multi-section buildings stretching along the entire embankment. Let’s explore the features and advantages of this unconventional method.
Competition: The Price of Creativity?
Any day now, we’re expecting the results of a competition held by the “Samolet” development group for a plot in Kommunarka. In the meantime, we share the impressions of Editor-in-Chief Julia Tarabarina, who managed to conduct a public talk. Though technically focused on the interaction between developers and architects, the public talk turned into a discussion about the pros and cons of architectural competitions.
Terraced Design
The “River Park” residential complex has confidently and securely shaped the Nagatinsky Backwater shoreline. Featuring a public embankment, elevated courtyards connected by pedestrian bridges, and brick façades, the development invites exploration of its nuanced response to the surrounding context, as well as hints of the architects’ megalithic design thinking.
A Kremlin’s Core and Meteorite Fragments
We continue our coverage of the competition projects for the residential district that the development company GloraX plans to build along the embankment of the Rowing Channel in Nizhny Novgorod. ASADOV Architects approached the concept through a deep dive into local identity, using storytelling to pinpoint a central idea for the design: the master plan and composition are imagined as if a meteorite had struck a “proto-Kremlin”. Sounds weird? Find more details below!
The Volga Regatta
GloraX plans to develop a residential complex spanning 14 hectares along the Volga River in Nizhny Novgorod. The winning design in a closed-door competition, created by GORA Architects, features housing typologies ranging from townhouses to terraced high-rise slabs, a balance of functions, diverse ways of engaging with the water, and even a dedicated island (no less!) for the city residents.
A New Track
We took a thorough look at D_Station, a railcar repair depot dating back to 1906, recently reconstructed while preserving its century-old industrial structure, upon the project by Sergey Trukhanov and T+T Architects. Though work on the interiors – set to house restaurants and public spaces – is still underway, the building’s exterior already offers plenty to see. Visitors can explore the blend of old and new brickwork, appreciate the architect’s unique interpretation of ruin aesthetics, and enjoy the newly built pedestrian route that connects the Citydel Business Center’s arches to Kazakova Street.
Four Different Surveys
The “Explore the City” competition, organized this year by the Genplan Institute of Moscow, stands out as a pretty unconventional one for the architectural field but aligns perfectly well with the character of urban planning work. The winning project analyzed contemporary residential complexes, combining urban planning insights with a realtor’s perspective to propose a hybrid approach. Other entries explored public centers, motivations for car ownership, and housing vacancy rates. A fifth participant withdrew. Here’s a closer look at the four completed works.
Scheduled Evolution
ASADOV Architects unveiled the EvyCenter pavilion, a microcultural hub for fostering personal growth, organizing workshops, and doing gymnastics. Additionally, this pavilion serves as a prototype for a scalable country house, drawing inspiration from the “Loskutok” project, and constructed from CLT panels in a factory. This marks the beginning of a developer project initiated by the architectural firm (sic!), which is seeking partners to expand both small Evy settlements and even larger Evy cities, which are, according to Andrey Asadov, aimed at fostering the “evolutionary” development of the people who will inhabit them.
The Golden Crown
The concept for a dental clinic in Yekaterinburg, developed by CNTR Studio, revolves around the idea of a “mouth full of gold”: pristine white porcelain stoneware walls are complemented by matte brass details. To avoid an overly literal interpretation, the architects focused on the building’s proportions, skillfully navigating between sunlight requirements and fire safety regulations.
Flexibility and Integration
Not long ago, we covered the project for the fourth phase of the ÁLIA residential complex, designed by APEX. Now, we’ve been shown different fence concepts they developed to enclose the complex’s private courtyards, incorporating a variety of public functions. We believe that the sheer fact that the complex’s architects were involved in such a detail as fencing speaks volumes.
A Step Forward
The HIDE residential complex represents a major milestone for ADM architects and their leaders Andrey Romanov and Ekaterina Kuznetsova in their quest for a fresh high-rise aesthetic – one that is flexible and layered, capable of bringing vibrancy to mass and silhouette while shaping form. Over recent years, this approach has become ADM’s “signature style”, with the golden HIDE tower playing a pivotal role in its evolution. Here, we delve into the project’s story, explore the details of the complex’s design, and uncover its core essence.
Gold in the Sands
A new office for a transcontinental company specializing in resource extraction and processing has opened in Dubai. Designed by T+T Architects, masters of creating spaces that are contemporary, diverse, flexible, and original, this project exemplifies their expertise. On the executive floor, a massive brass-clad partition dominates, while layered textures of compressed earth create a contextually resonant backdrop.
Layers and Levels of Flight
This project goes way back – Reserve Union won this architectural competition at the end of 2011, and the building was completed in 2018, so it’s practically “archival”. However, despite being relatively unknown, the building can hardly be considered “dated” and remains a prime example of architectural expression, particularly in the headquarters genre. And it’s especially fitting for an aviation company office. In some ways, it resembles the Aeroflot headquarters at Sheremetyevo but with its own unique identity, following the signature style of Vladimir Plotkin. In this article, we take an in-depth look at the United Aircraft Corporation (UAC) headquarters in the Moscow agglomeration town of Zhukovsky, supplemented by recent photographs from Alexey Naroditsky – a shoot that became only recently possible due to the fact that improvements were finally made in the surrounding area.
Light and Shadow
In this article, we delve into the architectural design of the “Chaika” house by DNK ag architects, which was recently completed in 2023 as part of the collection of signature designs at ZILArt. As is well-known, all the buildings in this complex follow a design code, yet each one is distinct. This particular building stands out not only for its whiteness and minimalism but also for the refined use of a limited number of techniques that, together, create what can confidently be called synergy.
Casus Novae
A master plan was developed for a large residential area with a name of “DNS City”, but now that its implementation began, the plan has been arbitrarily reformatted and replaced with something that, while similar on the surface, is actually quite different. This is not the first time such a thing happens, but it’s always frustrating. With permission from the author, we are sharing Maria Elkina’s post.
Treasure Hunting
The GAFA bureau, in collaboration with Tegola and Arkhitail, organized an expedition to the island of Kilpola in Karelia as part of Moskomarkhitektura’s “Open City” festival. There, amidst moss and rocks, the students sought answers to questions like: what is the sacred, where does it dwell, and what sustains it? Assisting the participants in this quest were landscape engineer Evgeny Levin, artist Nicholas Roerich, a moose, and the lack of cellular connection. Here’s how the story unfolded.
Depths of the Earth, Streams of Water
In the Malaya Okhta district, the Akzent building, designed by Stepan Liphart, was constructed. It follows a classic tripartite structure, yet it’s what you might call “hand-drawn”: each façade is unique in its form and details, some of which aren’t immediately noticeable. In this article, we explore the context and, together with the architect, delve into how the form was developed.
Fir Tree Dynamics
The “Airports of Region” holding is planning to build an airport in Karachay-Cherkessia, aiming to make the Arkhyz and Dombay resorts more accessible to travelers. The project that won in an invitation-only competition, submitted by Sergey Nikeshkin’s KPLN, blends natural imagery inspired by the shape of a conifer seed, open-air waiting spaces, majestic large trees, and a green roof elevated on needle-like columns. The result is both nature-inspired and WOW.
​A Brick Shell
In the process of designing a clubhouse situated among pine trees in a prestigious suburban area near Moscow, the architectural firm “A.Len” did the façade design part. The combination of different types of brick and masonry correlates with the volumetric and plastique solutions, further enhanced by the inclusion of wood-painted fragments and metal “glazing”.
Word Forms
ATRIUM architects love ambitious challenges, and for the firm’s thirtieth anniversary, they boldly play a game of words with an exhibition that dives deep into a self-created vocabulary. They immerse their projects – especially art installations – into this glossary, as if plunging into a current of their own. You feel as if you’re flowing through the veins of pure art, immersed in a universe of vertical cities, educational spaces – of which the architects are true masters – and the cultural codes of various locations. But what truly captivates is the bold statement that Vera Butko and Anton Nadtochy make, both through their work and this exhibition: architecture, above all, is art – the art of working with form and space.
Flexibility and Acuteness of Modernity
Luxurious, fluid, large “kokoshniks” and spiral barrel columns, as if made from colorful chewing gum: there seem to be no other mansion like this in Moscow, designed in the “Neo-Russian-Modern” style. And the “Teremok” on Malaya Kaluzhskaya, previously somewhat obscure, has “come alive with new colors” and gained visibility after its restoration for the office of the “architectural ecosystem” as the architects love to call themselves. It’s evident that Julius Borisov and the architects at UNK put their hearts into finding this new office and bringing it up to date. Let’s delve into the paradoxes of this mansion’s history and its plasticity. Spoiler: two versions of modernity meet here, both balancing on the razor’s edge of “what’s current”.
Yuri Vissarionov: “A modular house does not belong to the land”
It belongs to space, or to the air... It turns out that 3D printing is more effective when combined with a modular approach: the house is built in a workshop and then adapted to the site, including on uneven terrain. Yuri Vissarionov shares his latest experience in designing tourist complexes, both in central Russia and in the south. These include houseboats, homes printed from lightweight concrete using a 3D printer, and, of course, frame houses.
​Moscow’s First
“The quality of education largely depends on the quality of the educational environment”. This principle of the last decade has been realized by Sergey Skuratov in the project for the First Moscow Gymnasium on Rostovskaya Embankment in the Khamovniki district. The building seamlessly integrates into the complex urban landscape, responding both to the pedestrian flow of the city and the quiet alleyways. It skillfully takes advantage of the height differences and aligns with modern trends in educational space design. Let’s take a closer look.
Looking at the Water
The site of Villa Sonata stretches from the road to the water’s edge, offering its own shoreline, pier, and a picturesque river panorama. To reveal these sweeping views, Roman Leonidov “cut” the façade diagonally parallel to the river, thus getting two main axes for the house and, consequently, “two heads”. The internal core – two double-height spaces, a living room and a conservatory, with a “bridge” above them – makes the house both “transparent” and filled with light.
The White Wing
Well, it’s not exactly white. It’s more of a beige, white-stone structure that plays with the color of limestone – smoother surfaces are lighter, while rougher ones are darker. This wing unites various elements: it absorbs and interprets the surrounding themes. It responds to everything, yet maintains a cohesive expression – a challenging task! – while also incorporating recognizable features of its own, such as the dynamic cuts at the bottom, top, and middle.
Urban Dunes
The XSA Ramps team designed and built a three-part sports hub for a park in Rostov-on-Don, welcoming people of all ages and fitness levels. The skate plaza, pump track, and playground are all meticulously crafted with details that attract a diverse range of visitors. The technical execution of the shapes and slopes transforms this space into a kind of sculptural composition.
Proportional Growth
The project for the fourth phase of the ÁLIA residential area has been announced. The buildings are situated on an elongated plot – almost a “ray” that shoots out from the center of the area towards the river. Their layout reflects both a response to Moscow’s architectural preferences over the past 15 years, shifting “from blocks to towers”, and an interpretation of the neighboring business park designed by SOM. Additionally, the best apartments here are not located at the very top but closer to the middle, forming a glowing “waistline”.
The “Staircase” Building
In designing the “Details” residential complex in New Moscow, Rais Baishev spiced up the now-popular Moscow theme of a “courtyard” building with an idea drawn from the surrealist drawings by Maurits Escher. He envisioned the stepped silhouettes and descending slopes as a metaphysical mega-staircase, creating a key void within the courtyard that gave the project an internal “spine”. This concept is felt both in the building’s silhouette and on its façades.
Projection of the Quarter
No one doubted that the building that Vladimir Plotkin designed as part of the “Garden Quarters” would be the most modernist of all. And it turned out just that way: while adhering to the common design code, the building successfully combines brick and white stone, rhythmically responding to the neighboring building designed by Ostozhenka, yet tactfully and persistently making a few statements of its own. This includes the projection of the ideal urban development composition “14–9–6”, which can be found right next door, mathematical calculations, including those for various types of terraces (and perhaps the only reminder of the Soviet past of the Kauchuk rubber factory!), and the white “cross-stitch” pattern of the façade grid.