По-русски

​The Path to Diversity

A strict hierarchy of the arrangement of residential buildings and an abundance of interesting details of façade decoration are the two main features of the RiverSky housing project situated at the bend of the Moskva River – designed by GREN.

19 August 2019
Object
mainImg

The RiverSky housing complex will become a part of a large-scale project of developing the chunk of land lying alongside the Simonovskaya waterfront, the one that the architects and town planners have long since been working upon. The last edition of its development strategy was developed by KB Strelka with an active participation by the investor, GK INGRAD. There are plans for landscaping the waterfront, reconstructing the Torpedo Stadium, increasing the number of infrastructure projects, and building mixed-use (predominantly residential) complexes on the river banks. One of the land sites stretching between the stadium and the beginning of the river bend is developed by the architectural firm headed by Katerina Gren. The GREN. architects came up with a volumetric composition, floor plans, and façades of the complex.

RiverSky housing complex
Copyright: © Bureau of Architecture GREN.
  • zooming
    RiverSky housing complex. Master plan
    Copyright: © Bureau of Architecture GREN.
  • zooming
    RiverSky housing complex. Model
    Copyright: © Bureau of Architecture GREN.


This location entails quite a bit of responsibility: the land site is situated in the center of the city; on the one side, the housing complex will be forming the waterfront, on the other side, it cannot ignore the historical environment. Nearby, stands the Simonov monastery, and DK ZIL, designed by the Vesnin brothers and built on its territory.

GREN. arranges the eight buildings of the complex into two clusters separated by a promenade that leads to the waterfront. The semi-blocks are different, yet they consist of similar elements: each of the two has a landmark tower standing closer to the river, an elongated building with ledges, conditional “slabs” of the high-rises, and the “links” of the townhouses. Which forms a diverse silhouette: the height differences are not just considerable – up to 29 floors – but frequent as well.  

RiverSky housing complex
Copyright: © Bureau of Architecture GREN.


Thus, the volumetric solution turned out to be a hybrid one: in the low-rise part it has a “city block” character with houses asymmetrically surrounding semi-closed yet still spacious yards, while, as we go higher, the houses transform high-rise slabs, turned, much like lamellas, at a 45-degree angle to the waterfront, stretched from north to south. Which makes it possible to provide the maximum amount of sunlight to the apartments, as well as opens up the path for the river breeze and panoramic views from the windows. Just as important are the views of the architectural monuments of the Simonov monastery that open up from the water area, chief of them being the “Barrel” tower that is seen (assuming we are sailing a boat down the river) between the houses, getting into the array of the residential towers as an unexpected, yet still unique, inclusion. 

  • zooming
    1 / 3
    RiverSky housing complex. Development drawing
    Copyright: © Bureau of Architecture GREN.
  • zooming
    2 / 3
    RiverSky housing complex
    Copyright: © Bureau of Architecture GREN.
  • zooming
    3 / 3
    RiverSky housing complex
    Copyright: © Bureau of Architecture GREN.


The diversity, which was set by this volumetric solution, is also supported by the façades. The architects bring forward the combination of textures, using several façade decoration materials: Klinker brick and tiles, fiber cement panels, tinted glass, and metal. The architects are also working freely with it, liberally applying various techniques and stylistic devices: one can see here volumetric ornaments and perforated brick, openwork grilles, geometrical patterns, printing on glass, flute-imitating piers, noticeable elements of navigation, deep colors, and combinations of contrastive textures. This whole whirlpool of ideas is arranged into a well-organized system, which can be best described as “tasteful”: the complex looks light and elegant. “For each of our clients, we create custom design that completely meets his needs, and then we inscribe that project into the environment – Katerina Gren is saying – Every little detail is important for us”.  

  • zooming
    1 / 9
    RiverSky housing complex
    Copyright: © Bureau of Architecture GREN.
  • zooming
    2 / 9
    RiverSky housing complex
    Copyright: © Bureau of Architecture GREN.
  • zooming
    3 / 9
    RiverSky housing complex
    Copyright: © Bureau of Architecture GREN.
  • zooming
    4 / 9
    RiverSky housing complex
    Copyright: © Bureau of Architecture GREN.
  • zooming
    5 / 9
    RiverSky housing complex
    Copyright: © Bureau of Architecture GREN.
  • zooming
    6 / 9
    RiverSky housing complex
    Copyright: © Bureau of Architecture GREN.
  • zooming
    7 / 9
    RiverSky housing complex
    Copyright: © Bureau of Architecture GREN.
  • zooming
    8 / 9
    RiverSky housing complex
    Copyright: © Bureau of Architecture GREN.
  • zooming
    9 / 9
    RiverSky housing complex
    Copyright: © Bureau of Architecture GREN.


The façades of the top floors in the upper part of some of the buildings, however, are made terminally simple – you will not see here the abundance of details and textures, just strict geometry of laconic milk-white panels. The sky-high rooftops attenuate still more the space of the city blocks, “latching together” the buildings of dark brick with its light-colored towers, adding the modernist lightness into this respectable-looking image, not without a twist of “textured” conservatism.

RiverSky housing complex
Copyright: © Bureau of Architecture GREN.


The third level of diversity – that comes after the variety of heights and façades – are the floor plans. Each building is different, and there are quite unconventional solutions to be seen: a bathroom or a living room with a window, stanzas with pull-out panoramic glazing, which can be turned into terraces up to 2.7 meters deep, and so on. Not every Muscovite has an opportunity to enjoy the beauty of the panorama of the Moskva River, the panorama of the historical part of the city, or simply to admire the sunset – without leaving his residence. In addition, thanks to the Finnish-made system of frameless glazing, the panoramas will be “penetrating” the apartments, even in the cold time of the year.

  • zooming
    RiverSky housing complex
    Copyright: © Bureau of Architecture GREN.
  • zooming
    RiverSky housing complex
    Copyright: © Bureau of Architecture GREN.


The location and the status of the complex allowed the architects to include into it not only townhouses but also two-level apartments up to 7.5 meters tall. Some of them, thanks to the ledges of the volumes, have small patios and exits to their own terraces on the operated roof of the joining section – a great place for making parties or just spending an evening with your family. Totally, RiverSky has 1342 apartments in it, the number of rooms ranging from one to four. 

  • zooming
    1 / 3
    RiverSky housing complex
    Copyright: © Bureau of Architecture GREN.
  • zooming
    2 / 3
    RiverSky housing complex
    Copyright: © Bureau of Architecture GREN.
  • zooming
    3 / 3
    RiverSky housing complex
    Copyright: © Bureau of Architecture GREN.


GREN. also designed the entrance groups and prepared the landscaping project. And, although later on the client organized independent competitions – their results being that the public bottom floors will be decorated by UNK project, and the landscaping will be done by Wowhaus – the versions developed by Katerina Gren were fitting in nicely with the project of the complex and were its natural continuation, and that’s why we will say a few words here about these sections that “remained on paper”. 

Already in the flutes of the bottom floors of the buildings, as well as in the frame portals of the entrances, one can acutely feel similarity to the generalized Art Deco classics. Proposed by the GREN. architects, the projects of the entrance areas develop and enhance this theme: the light-colored stone is combined with polished metalwork, while the strings of crystal suspensions add to the overall beauty. The diamond-shaped ornaments on the façades are supported by the decorative pattern of the windows and grilles; the stone flutes are echoed by ribbed copper friezes under the ceiling, and even the row of tall lamellas is resonant with the volumetric organization of the slab towers of the complex. 

  • zooming
    1 / 4
    RiverSky housing complex
    Copyright: © Bureau of Architecture GREN.
  • zooming
    2 / 4
    RiverSky housing complex
    Copyright: © Bureau of Architecture GREN.
  • zooming
    3 / 4
    RiverSky housing complex
    Copyright: © Bureau of Architecture GREN.
  • zooming
    4 / 4
    RiverSky housing complex
    Copyright: © Bureau of Architecture GREN.


The landscaping project proposed by Katerina Gren accentuated the promenade that stretched between the houses in the direction of the Moskva River. Its axis is marked by alternating benches, tubs with trees, and “strokes” of lawn rectangles. In the yards, the theme is supported by white pergolas and climbing rope nets for children bent in large wave-like shapes, almost like sculptures. The bushes and trees alternate with lush bunches of topical cereal plants, lawns being on a level with the pavement.

  • zooming
    1 / 5
    RiverSky housing complex
    Copyright: © Bureau of Architecture GREN.
  • zooming
    2 / 5
    RiverSky housing complex
    Copyright: © Bureau of Architecture GREN.
  • zooming
    3 / 5
    RiverSky housing complex
    Copyright: © Bureau of Architecture GREN.
  • zooming
    4 / 5
    RiverSky housing complex
    Copyright: © Bureau of Architecture GREN.
  • zooming
    5 / 5
    RiverSky housing complex
    Copyright: © Bureau of Architecture GREN.


Due to the fact that in the future RiverSky will become a part of a large recreational territory – with a stadium, a waterfront, and a few little parks –the bottom floors will be occupied by the retail function. “One of the main tasks that our company sets for itself is creating new gravity centers within the city space, ones with unique architectural and town-planning volumetric solutions. We want to do projects that make their own history – Katerina Gren says – And each of them is about the idea of a uniquely comfortable environment that combines architectural bravery, harmony, and spiritual aesthetics. The residential area RiverSky completely answers these definitions. This project has a lot of soul to it”. 

19 August 2019

Headlines now
Depths of the Earth, Streams of Water
In the Malaya Okhta district, the Akzent building, designed by Stepan Liphart, was constructed. It follows a classic tripartite structure, yet it’s what you might call “hand-drawn”: each façade is unique in its form and details, some of which aren’t immediately noticeable. In this article, we explore the context and, together with the architect, delve into how the form was developed.
Fir Tree Dynamics
The “Airports of Region” holding is planning to build an airport in Karachay-Cherkessia, aiming to make the Arkhyz and Dombay resorts more accessible to travelers. The project that won in an invitation-only competition, submitted by Sergey Nikeshkin’s KPLN, blends natural imagery inspired by the shape of a conifer seed, open-air waiting spaces, majestic large trees, and a green roof elevated on needle-like columns. The result is both nature-inspired and WOW.
​A Brick Shell
In the process of designing a clubhouse situated among pine trees in a prestigious suburban area near Moscow, the architectural firm “A.Len” did the façade design part. The combination of different types of brick and masonry correlates with the volumetric and plastique solutions, further enhanced by the inclusion of wood-painted fragments and metal “glazing”.
Word Forms
ATRIUM architects love ambitious challenges, and for the firm’s thirtieth anniversary, they boldly play a game of words with an exhibition that dives deep into a self-created vocabulary. They immerse their projects – especially art installations – into this glossary, as if plunging into a current of their own. You feel as if you’re flowing through the veins of pure art, immersed in a universe of vertical cities, educational spaces – of which the architects are true masters – and the cultural codes of various locations. But what truly captivates is the bold statement that Vera Butko and Anton Nadtochy make, both through their work and this exhibition: architecture, above all, is art – the art of working with form and space.
Flexibility and Acuteness of Modernity
Luxurious, fluid, large “kokoshniks” and spiral barrel columns, as if made from colorful chewing gum: there seem to be no other mansion like this in Moscow, designed in the “Neo-Russian-Modern” style. And the “Teremok” on Malaya Kaluzhskaya, previously somewhat obscure, has “come alive with new colors” and gained visibility after its restoration for the office of the “architectural ecosystem” as the architects love to call themselves. It’s evident that Julius Borisov and the architects at UNK put their hearts into finding this new office and bringing it up to date. Let’s delve into the paradoxes of this mansion’s history and its plasticity. Spoiler: two versions of modernity meet here, both balancing on the razor’s edge of “what’s current”.
Yuri Vissarionov: “A modular house does not belong to the land”
It belongs to space, or to the air... It turns out that 3D printing is more effective when combined with a modular approach: the house is built in a workshop and then adapted to the site, including on uneven terrain. Yuri Vissarionov shares his latest experience in designing tourist complexes, both in central Russia and in the south. These include houseboats, homes printed from lightweight concrete using a 3D printer, and, of course, frame houses.
​Moscow’s First
“The quality of education largely depends on the quality of the educational environment”. This principle of the last decade has been realized by Sergey Skuratov in the project for the First Moscow Gymnasium on Rostovskaya Embankment in the Khamovniki district. The building seamlessly integrates into the complex urban landscape, responding both to the pedestrian flow of the city and the quiet alleyways. It skillfully takes advantage of the height differences and aligns with modern trends in educational space design. Let’s take a closer look.
Looking at the Water
The site of Villa Sonata stretches from the road to the water’s edge, offering its own shoreline, pier, and a picturesque river panorama. To reveal these sweeping views, Roman Leonidov “cut” the façade diagonally parallel to the river, thus getting two main axes for the house and, consequently, “two heads”. The internal core – two double-height spaces, a living room and a conservatory, with a “bridge” above them – makes the house both “transparent” and filled with light.
The White Wing
Well, it’s not exactly white. It’s more of a beige, white-stone structure that plays with the color of limestone – smoother surfaces are lighter, while rougher ones are darker. This wing unites various elements: it absorbs and interprets the surrounding themes. It responds to everything, yet maintains a cohesive expression – a challenging task! – while also incorporating recognizable features of its own, such as the dynamic cuts at the bottom, top, and middle.
Urban Dunes
The XSA Ramps team designed and built a three-part sports hub for a park in Rostov-on-Don, welcoming people of all ages and fitness levels. The skate plaza, pump track, and playground are all meticulously crafted with details that attract a diverse range of visitors. The technical execution of the shapes and slopes transforms this space into a kind of sculptural composition.
Proportional Growth
The project for the fourth phase of the ÁLIA residential area has been announced. The buildings are situated on an elongated plot – almost a “ray” that shoots out from the center of the area towards the river. Their layout reflects both a response to Moscow’s architectural preferences over the past 15 years, shifting “from blocks to towers”, and an interpretation of the neighboring business park designed by SOM. Additionally, the best apartments here are not located at the very top but closer to the middle, forming a glowing “waistline”.
The “Staircase” Building
In designing the “Details” residential complex in New Moscow, Rais Baishev spiced up the now-popular Moscow theme of a “courtyard” building with an idea drawn from the surrealist drawings by Maurits Escher. He envisioned the stepped silhouettes and descending slopes as a metaphysical mega-staircase, creating a key void within the courtyard that gave the project an internal “spine”. This concept is felt both in the building’s silhouette and on its façades.
Projection of the Quarter
No one doubted that the building that Vladimir Plotkin designed as part of the “Garden Quarters” would be the most modernist of all. And it turned out just that way: while adhering to the common design code, the building successfully combines brick and white stone, rhythmically responding to the neighboring building designed by Ostozhenka, yet tactfully and persistently making a few statements of its own. This includes the projection of the ideal urban development composition “14–9–6”, which can be found right next door, mathematical calculations, including those for various types of terraces (and perhaps the only reminder of the Soviet past of the Kauchuk rubber factory!), and the white “cross-stitch” pattern of the façade grid.
Domus Aurea
In this issue, we examine the “Tessinsky-1” house, designed by Sergey Skuratov and completed in 2023. Located in the middle of the Serebryanicheskaya Embankment district, at the intersection of its main streets, this house assumes a sort of “nodal” role: it not only responds to everything around it and preserves many memories of the former EMA factory within itself, but it weaves all this into a newly directed pattern, reconciling bright “gold” and dark-colored brick, largely with the help of the new, modern-yet-archaic Columba brick, which, come to think about it, is the most precious element here.
The Chimney of Nikola-Lenivets
In this issue, we are examining the “Obelisk House” designed by KATARSIS and built for the Arkhstoyanie 2023 festival. However, it was only finished later on, and this is why we are examining it now. It seems to us that after the “Obelisk House” appeared in Nikola-Lenivets, a dialogue and a few inner connections appeared between the temporary structures built here. These houses no longer look like “accidental neighbors”, more of which below.
​Periscope by the Bay
The jury awarded the second place in the competition for a public and cultural center in Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky to the companies GORA (“Mountain”) and M4. In the consortium’s proposal, the building resembles a sperm whale with a calf swimming next to it or a periscope, whose lenses capture the most spectacular views from the surrounding landscape.
From Arcs to Dolmens
While working on the competition project for Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky, ASADOV Architects prioritized the value of the natural and urban environment, aiming to preserve the balance of the location while minimizing the resemblance of the volume that they designed to a “traditional building”. The task was challenging, and the architects created three versions, one of which having been developed after the competition, where their main proposal took third place. However, the point of interest here is not the competition result but the continuity of creative thinking.
Hide and Seek
The ID Moskovskiy house, designed by Stepan Liphart in St. Petersburg, in the courtyards near Moskovskiy Avenue beyond the Obvodny Canal and recently completed, is notable for several reasons. Firstly, it has been realized with considerable accuracy, which is particularly significant as this is the first building where the architect was responsible not only for the facades but also for the layouts, allowing for better integration between the two. On the other hand, this building is interesting as an example of the “germination” of new architecture in the city: it draws on the best examples from the neighborhood and becomes an improved and developed sum of ideas found by the architect in the surrounding context.
The Big Twelve
Yesterday, the winners of the Moscow Mayor’s Architecture Award were announced and honored. Let’s take a look at what was awarded and, in some cases, even critique this esteemed award. After all, there is always room for improvement, right?
Above the Golden Horn
The residential complex “Philosophy” designed by T+T architects in Vladivostok, is one of the new projects in the “Golubinaya Pad” area, changing its development philosophy (pun intended) from single houses to a comprehensive approach. The buildings are organized along public streets, varying in height and format, with one house even executed in gallery typology, featuring a cantilever leaning on an art object.
Nuanced Alternative
How can you rhyme a square and space? Easily! But to do so, you need to rhyme everything you can possibly think of: weave everything together, like in a tensegrity structure, and find your own optics too. The new exhibition at GES-2 does just that, offering its visitor a new perspective on the history of art spanning 150 years, infused with the hope for endless multiplicity of worlds and art histories. Read on to see how this is achieved and how the exhibition design by Evgeny Ace contributes to it.
Blinds for Ice
An ice arena has been constructed in Domodedovo based on a project by Yuri Vissarionov Architects. To prevent the long façade, a technical requirement for winter sports facilities, from appearing monotonous, the architects proposed the use of suspended structures with multidirectional slats. This design protects the ice from direct sunlight while giving the wall texture and detail.
Frozen Magma
A competition for the creation of a public and cultural center was held in Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky. Three architectural companies made it to the final, and we consider it important to share about the work of each. Let’s start with the winner – the consortium led by Wowhaus.
Campus within a Day
In this article, we talk about what the participants of Genplan Institute of Moscow’s hackathon were doing at the MosComArchitecture booth at the “ArchMoscow” exhibition. We also discuss who won the prize and why, and what can be done with the territory of a small university on the outskirts of Moscow.
Vertical Civilization
Genpro considered the development of the vertical city concept and made it the theme of their pavilion at the “ArchMoscow” exhibition.
Marina Yegorova: “We think in terms of hectares, not square meters”
The career path of architect Marina Yegorova is quite impressive: MARHI, SPEECH, MosComArchitectura, the Genplan Institute of Moscow, and then her own architectural company. Its name Empate, which refers to the words “to draw” in Portuguese and “to empathize” in English, should not be misleading with its softness, as the firm freely works on different scales, including Integrated Territorial Development projects. We talked with Marina about various topics: urban planning experience, female leadership style, and even the love of architects for yachting.
Andrey Chuikov: “Optimum balance is achieved through economics”
The Yekaterinburg-based architectural company CNTR is in its mature stage: crystallization of principles, systematization, and standardization helped it make a qualitative leap, enhance competencies, and secure large contracts without sacrificing the aesthetic component. The head of the company, Andrey Chuikov, told us about building a business model and the bonuses that additional education in financial management provides for an architect.
The Fulcrum
Ostozhenka Architects have designed two astonishing towers practically on the edge of a slope above the Oka River in Nizhny Novgorod. These towers stand on 10-meter-tall weathered steel “legs”, with each floor offering panoramic views of the river and the city; all public spaces, including corridors, receive plenty of natural light. Here, we see a multitude of solutions that are unconventional for the residential routine of our day and age. Meanwhile, although these towers hark back to the typological explorations of the seventies, they are completely reinvented in a contemporary key. We admire Veren Group as the client – this is exactly how a “unique product” should be made – and we tell you exactly how our towers are arranged.
Crystal is Watching You
Right now, Museum Night has kicked off at the Museum of Architecture, featuring a fresh new addition – the “Crystal of Perception”, an installation by Sergey Kuznetsov, Ivan Grekov, and the KROST company, set up in the courtyard. It shimmers with light, it sings, it reacts to the approach of people, and who knows what else it can do.
The Secret Briton
The house is called “Little France”. Its composition follows the classical St. Petersburg style, with a palace-like courtyard. The decor is on the brink of Egyptian lotuses, neo-Greek acroteria, and classic 1930s “gears”; the recessed piers are Gothic, while the silhouette of the central part of the house is British. It’s quite interesting to examine all these details, attempting to understand which architectural direction they belong to. At the same time, however, the house fits like a glove in the context of the 20th line of St. Petersburg’s Vasilievsky Island; its elongated wings hold up the façade quite well.