По-русски

Four Different Surveys

The “Explore the City” competition, organized this year by the Genplan Institute of Moscow, stands out as a pretty unconventional one for the architectural field but aligns perfectly well with the character of urban planning work. The winning project analyzed contemporary residential complexes, combining urban planning insights with a realtor’s perspective to propose a hybrid approach. Other entries explored public centers, motivations for car ownership, and housing vacancy rates. A fifth participant withdrew. Here’s a closer look at the four completed works.

25 November 2024
Report
mainImg
From April to September, the Genplan Institute of Moscow conducted a competition on what could be described as “unfamiliar territory” – namely, urban research.

An interesting initiative, to say the least! Typically, architectural competitions focus on specific tasks, sites, or projects – or, conversely, delve into terminally abstract concepts. Urban research, however, is usually commissioned rather than treated as a competitive exercise. This time, after a preliminary portfolio and motivation letter review, five participants were selected to work for a symbolic fee, later divided as prize money based on rankings (from 750 000 to 250 000 rubles). Since each nomination was handled by a single participant, the competition format fell somewhere between a commissioned project and a closed-door competition.

Secondly, what does a competition for research projects entail when it comes to judging? Evaluating such work is no easy task: research quality depends on the scope of data analyzed, the depth of its interpretation, methodological nuances, and practical applicability, among other factors. How can all this be weighed simultaneously? It’s no surprise that the organizers framed the competition’s goal as “raising public awareness about urban development challenges and opportunities”. While this wording sounds quite vague, to put it mildly, I would argue the primary aim was itself an experiment – a kind of “meta-research”: testing the capacity of teams willing to tackle the outlined challenges, exploring various methodologies, assessing the time required for thorough investigation, and, most importantly, pushing boundaries beyond habitual urban planning routines. For all intents and purposes, the concept was to take familiar topics, mix them together, give them a good shake, and see what innovative ideas might emerge.

It is important to note that this was the first time the Genplan Institute of Moscow organized such a competition, embracing innovative initiatives.

“The first experience was undoubtedly a success” says the institute’s director, Tatyana Guk, “I can’t say that everything we saw during the judging process will immediately find practical application, but some ideas are definitely worth considering. There are some very viable approaches”.

  • zooming
    Sergey Kuznetsov and Tatyana Guk at the jury meeting. “Explore the City” competition, presentation of research results.
  • zooming
    Tatiana Guk at the jury meeting. “Explore the City” competition, presentation of research results.


Judging, it turned out, was not as challenging as we thought it would be. One project, by unanimous agreement, stood head and shoulders above the rest in terms of detail and originality. 

1st place: 
A catalogue of residential environments


Modern approaches to the spatial organization of residential areas
Curators: Vitaly Lutz, Olga Blagodeteleva
Team: A. Danilchenko, D. Medvedev, D. Pereyaslavtsev, V. Pomogaev, B. Savkin, A. Siraeva, S. Skotnikov, U. Suleymanova, A. Tolmachev


Winning team. “Explore the City” competition, presentation of research results.


The winning team was large, enthusiastic, and impressively coherent. According to the participants, most of them met while studying at HSE University, and they came together specifically for this project but plan to collaborate further in the future.

Proceeding from the stated task – “Developing architectural and urban planning approaches to creating a comfortable urban environment” – I somehow anticipated vague discussions about green spaces and park benches.

In reality, however, the team, under the guidance of the Department of Prospective Studies led by Vitaly Lutz, created an original catalogue of residential complex “archetypes”. They introduced a new methodology that appears to combine two essential perspectives: architectural/urbanistic and market-oriented. As they explained, “Classes fail to reflect morphological diversity, while morphotypes overlook product variety”. It’s akin to layering two grids – and possibly three, incorporating perspectives from officials and regulatory bodies as well. This approach made their results not only substantial in volume (100 pages of presentation material) but also multi-dimensional. The research addresses three distinct audiences: (1) administrators – for decision-making and policy development, (2) residents – to assess and meet community needs, (3) designers – including architects and developers, to guide future projects.

It is important to note that each survay has a practical purpose, which is crucial for the future application of its findings. The Catalogue of Residential Environments is an analysis of extensive data on housing construction over the past five years. The result offers not only a wealth of information about existing housing morphotypes and popular architectural solutions but, most importantly, a clear understanding of residents’ preferences regarding their living environment. Together, this data forms a ready-to-use tool for designers, which can be immediately applied in practice.


One thing is clear: this is the kind of study that invites further exploration. It gives you the sense that you’re uncovering insights about both market dynamics and emerging trends. The conceptual framework proposed by the team is noteworthy in its own right.

  • zooming
    “Catalogue of residential environments” survey. The winner
  • zooming
    “Catalogue of residential environments” survey. The winner
    Copyright: “Center” Agency, "Explore the City!" competition, Genplan Institute of Moscow, 2024


The participants developed a survey matrix, identified 94 parameters for evaluation, analyzed 23 residential complexes, and defined seven housing archetypes for Moscow from 2019 onward. They noted that while the matrix itself remains stable, the archetypes seem to evolve almost in real-time. The authors also referenced international examples, contrasting practices in the Netherlands and Uzbekistan, and included insights from Russian regions. Their work culminated in 11 pages summarizing residential market trends.

  • zooming
    1 / 18
    “Catalogue of residential environments” survey. The winner
  • zooming
    2 / 18
    “Catalogue of residential environments” survey. The winner
  • zooming
    3 / 18
    “Catalogue of residential environments” survey. The winner
  • zooming
    4 / 18
    “Catalogue of residential environments” survey. The winner
  • zooming
    5 / 18
    “Catalogue of residential environments” survey. The winner
  • zooming
    6 / 18
    “Catalogue of residential environments” survey. The winner
    Copyright: "Collective of 12«, »Explore the City!" competition, Genplan Institute of Moscow, 2024.
  • zooming
    7 / 18
    “Catalogue of residential environments” survey. The winner
    Copyright: "Collective of 12«, »Explore the City!" competition, Genplan Institute of Moscow, 2024.
  • zooming
    8 / 18
    “Catalogue of residential environments” survey. The winner
    Copyright: "Collective of 12«, »Explore the City!" competition, Genplan Institute of Moscow, 2024.
  • zooming
    9 / 18
    “Catalogue of residential environments” survey. The winner
    Copyright: "Collective of 12«, »Explore the City!" competition, Genplan Institute of Moscow, 2024.
  • zooming
    10 / 18
    “Catalogue of residential environments” survey. The winner
    Copyright: "Collective of 12«, »Explore the City!" competition, Genplan Institute of Moscow, 2024.
  • zooming
    11 / 18
    “Catalogue of residential environments” survey. The winner
  • zooming
    12 / 18
    “Catalogue of residential environments” survey. The winner
  • zooming
    13 / 18
    “Catalogue of residential environments” survey. The winner
  • zooming
    14 / 18
    “Catalogue of residential environments” survey. The winner
  • zooming
    15 / 18
    “Catalogue of residential environments” survey. The winner
  • zooming
    16 / 18
    “Catalogue of residential environments” survey. The winner
  • zooming
    17 / 18
    “Catalogue of residential environments” survey. The winner
  • zooming
    18 / 18
    “Catalogue of residential environments” survey. The winner
    Copyright: "Collective of 12«, »Explore the City!" competition, Genplan Institute of Moscow, 2024.


The seven archetypes are:
  • City within a City
  • City Outside the City
  • Universal Residential Complexes
  • Urban Oases
  • Residential Skyscrapers
  • Business Residences
  • Premium Residential Complexes
Interestingly, the team mentioned a new archetype in their interviews: high-rise complexes over 30 stories in New Moscow. These include projects like “Novye Smysly” (“New Meanings”) and others, yet undisclosed.

  • zooming
    1 / 7
    “Catalogue of residential environments” survey. The winner
  • zooming
    2 / 7
    “Catalogue of residential environments” survey. The winner
  • zooming
    3 / 7
    “Catalogue of residential environments” survey. The winner
  • zooming
    4 / 7
    “Catalogue of residential environments” survey. The winner
  • zooming
    5 / 7
    “Catalogue of residential environments” survey. The winner
  • zooming
    6 / 7
    “Catalogue of residential environments” survey. The winner
    Copyright: "Collective of 12«, »Explore the City!" competition, Genplan Institute of Moscow, 2024.
  • zooming
    7 / 7
    “Catalogue of residential environments” survey. The winner
    Copyright: "Collective of 12«, »Explore the City!" competition, Genplan Institute of Moscow, 2024.


The authors cited an impressive range of previous studies, highlighting as a close comparison a project by KB Strelka on urban renewal (commissioned by DOM.RF). They also outlined plans for the future, presenting the research in a more user-friendly format, such as a landing page for potential buyers, conducting a survey of at least 1 500 residents to ensure a representative sample, and avoiding unnecessary tools, like a mobile app, which they deemed excessive. They drew a careful comparison between the American form-based code and Moscow’s land use and development rules, describing the latter as more dynamic and flexible – neither approach being inherently superior. This measured perspective speaks to the authors’ clear understanding of their work and its broader context. The team’s potential is undeniable, and the Genplan Institute of Moscow may well seek to collaborate with them again in the future.

As for the title, the competition’s nomination originally included the term “living environment,” but the study honed this to the more specific “residential environment”. It’s rare to see a shift toward greater precision in such cases – usually, it’s the opposite.

The research results are available online as an XLS spreadsheet. Notably, the Matrix and Catalogue are located on separate tabs within the same file.

Yury Sheredega, architect, partner and co-founder of the Sheredega Consulting project consulting bureau.

In the context of the urban development boom we are witnessing, it is essential to support not only the creative but also the scientific aspects of urban planning projects. Unfortunately, examples of post-project studies are exceedingly rare. However, reflecting on existing experiences provides valuable insights into how our projects influence the urban environment after their implementation. Experimental research can yield both positive and negative results, helping us assess the current state of affairs and chart a course for future progress.


2nd Place
City within a city


Local community centers in the peripheral areas of the city
Curator: Dmitry Nekrasov, Head of the Department of Strategic Planning and Urban Development Economics at the Genplan Institute of Moscow.
Authors and leads: Sergey Georgievsky, Ketevan Khelaya, Olga Gritsan, Maria Sedletskaya.
Team members: Territorial Planning – Alexandra Yaderskaya, Yulia Vedenina; Architecture – Yana Ness; GIS Analytics – Sergey Biryukov; Economics – Timur Baychurin; Sociocultural Programming – Andrey Vashchuk; Sociology – Pavel Stepantsov, Yulia Stepantsova, Ekaterina Sakharova, Yana Kruglik, Anastasia Kuznetsova; Materials Design – Denis Dmitrienko, Grigory Guslitskov.


“Catalogue of residential environments” survey. The winner


The second team was significantly larger, consisting of 17 members compared to the 11 of the “Collective of 12”, including curators. The professional expertise of the Agency “Center” is beyond doubt, making their selection as participants a seemingly foolproof decision. Their urban research methods and principles are well-honed.

The survey begins with an extensive definition of Moscow’s periphery as such. To “find” the periphery, the authors identify six city-level centers: in addition to the Kremlin, these include the Moscow International Business Center (MIBC or “Moscow City”), VDNKh, Serp i Molot (likely referring to the residential complex “Symbol”), ZIL, the upcoming Shagal residential complex in Nagatino, and the Southern Port, which is currently more of a planned center than a reality. This initial exploration shows that Moscow already has so-called “polycenters”. From here, the study narrows its focus using purchasing activity data, particularly billing transaction concentrations. Out of 11 identified territories, the authors select two “model” areas for detailed analysis. These areas are chosen for their relative distance from established centers and their “semi-enclave” status, indicating varying degrees of isolation from the city.

  • zooming
    1 / 6
    The “City within a City” project. 2nd place
  • zooming
    2 / 6
    The “City within a City” project. 2nd place
    Copyright: “Center” Agency, "Explore the City!" competition, Genplan Institute of Moscow, 2024
  • zooming
    3 / 6
    The “City within a City” project. 2nd place
    Copyright: “Center” Agency, "Explore the City!" competition, Genplan Institute of Moscow, 2024
  • zooming
    4 / 6
    The “City within a City” project. 2nd place
    Copyright: “Center” Agency, "Explore the City!" competition, Genplan Institute of Moscow, 2024
  • zooming
    5 / 6
    The “City within a City” project. 2nd place
    Copyright: “Center” Agency, "Explore the City!" competition, Genplan Institute of Moscow, 2024
  • zooming
    6 / 6
    The “City within a City” project. 2nd place
    Copyright: “Center” Agency, "Explore the City!" competition, Genplan Institute of Moscow, 2024


In the south, the selected area is East Biryulyovo; in the north, it is the Lianozovo-Bibirevo-Altufyevo cluster.

  • zooming
    The eastern Biryulevo. The “City within a City” project. 2nd place
  • zooming
    Lianozovo-Bibirevo-Altufyevo. The “City within a City” project. 2nd place
    Copyright: “Center” Agency, "Explore the City!" competition, Genplan Institute of Moscow, 2024


The authors conducted on-site filming and interviewed local residents.

Conclusions: the more isolated an area is, the less successful and more dismal it becomes. The situation in Biryulyovo is notably worse than in Bibirevo. Biryulyovo, being a more isolated district, suffers acutely from the lack of a metro station – a long-awaited development hindered by a mysterious underground route. It is unlikely that the ongoing construction of the “Meeting Place” complex on the site of the former Chkalov plant will solve this issue. Unsurprisingly, the study reaffirmed a familiar fact: public centers in remote districts are largely limited to shopping malls, residential complexes, fitness centers, and children’s creativity hubs – with little progress beyond that.

  • zooming
    The eastern Biryulevo. The “City within a City” project. 2nd place
  • zooming
    Lianozovo-Bibirevo-Altufyevo. The “City within a City” project. 2nd place
    Copyright: “Center” Agency, "Explore the City!" competition, Genplan Institute of Moscow, 2024


A striking observation was made by Olga Gritsan, Head of the Analytics Department at the Strategic Development Agency “CENTER”: “I live in the Moscow Region town of Ramenskoye and was unpleasantly surprised to find that public spaces in Biryulyovo are less developed than those in the Moscow suburbs.” On the other hand, Bibirevo’s “Park of Light” was vandalized.

Conclusions and recommendations under the caption “Local Centers: Formula for Success” occupy about a fifth of the study, presented in the form of diagrams and tables of potential resident demands.

  • zooming
    1 / 9
    Vision for the development of local peripheral centers. The “City within a City” project. 2nd place
  • zooming
    2 / 9
    Vision for the development of local peripheral centers. The “City within a City” project. 2nd place
    Copyright: “Center” Agency, "Explore the City!" competition, Genplan Institute of Moscow, 2024
  • zooming
    3 / 9
    Vision for the development of local peripheral centers. The “City within a City” project. 2nd place
    Copyright: “Center” Agency, "Explore the City!" competition, Genplan Institute of Moscow, 2024
  • zooming
    4 / 9
    Vision for the development of local peripheral centers. The “City within a City” project. 2nd place
    Copyright: “Center” Agency, "Explore the City!" competition, Genplan Institute of Moscow, 2024
  • zooming
    5 / 9
    Vision for the development of local peripheral centers. The “City within a City” project. 2nd place
    Copyright: “Center” Agency, "Explore the City!" competition, Genplan Institute of Moscow, 2024
  • zooming
    6 / 9
    Vision for the development of local peripheral centers. The “City within a City” project. 2nd place
    Copyright: “Center” Agency, "Explore the City!" competition, Genplan Institute of Moscow, 2024
  • zooming
    7 / 9
    Vision for the development of local peripheral centers. The “City within a City” project. 2nd place
    Copyright: “Center” Agency, "Explore the City!" competition, Genplan Institute of Moscow, 2024
  • zooming
    8 / 9
    Vision for the development of local peripheral centers. The “City within a City” project. 2nd place
    Copyright: “Center” Agency, "Explore the City!" competition, Genplan Institute of Moscow, 2024
  • zooming
    9 / 9
    Vision for the development of local peripheral centers. The “City within a City” project. 2nd place
    Copyright: “Center” Agency, "Explore the City!" competition, Genplan Institute of Moscow, 2024


The authors even make an attempt to scale their findings to other cities, using Pskov and Vyazma as examples.

The research appears extensive and detailed, featuring quotes, diagrams, lists, and statistics. It also incorporates positive, modern approaches tested in central areas of the city: transitioning from mono- to multifunctionality, promoting resident engagement, ensuring 15-minute accessibility, and considering various aspects of “centrality”, from economic to cultural. Attention is also given to residents’ concerns about citywide improvements potentially erasing local identity and personal connections to their neighborhoods.

Nevertheless, the emergence of new public centers on the periphery does not paint a particularly bright picture. Footage reveals that the only example of contemporary architecture in this context comes from cultural centers in the “39 Cinemas” program. These are clean and appealing but predominantly function as shopping malls – firstly – and, secondly, they are all uniform or visually similar, giving the impression of a standardized design. However, perhaps this is only the beginning of a longer journey.

Kirill Puzanov, Academic Supervisor of the Master′s Program “Digital Urbanism and City Analytics” at the National Research University Higher School of Economics (HSE).

Competitions that challenge us with new questions play a key role in advancing both science and practice. We should welcome such initiatives and hope that scientific research will once again become the starting point for future projects. It is crucial that the outcomes of these competitions do not go unnoticed: they must be shared with a wider audience and the expert community to spark new discussions and raise pressing issues.


3rd Place
What do you need a car for?


A study of the motivations behind car ownership
Curator: Natalia Karmadonova, Head of the Transport Systems Planning Workshop
Participants: Anastasia Pirotskaya, Ksenia Radygina, Ekaterina Nichaeva, Daria Pudovkina, Ekaterina Tsimbota


  • zooming
    Elena Borovik, Chief Project Engineer at the Transport Engineering Center of the Genplan Institute. “Explore the City” competition, presentation of research results.
  • zooming
    Team 3: CIAN. “Explore the City” competition, presentation of research results.


To be quite honest, as a car owner myself, I found the topic somewhat predetermined in its conclusions. You know how questions like “why” or “for what purpose” are often framed to lead you toward a desired answer? In this case, it feels like the underlying message is that cars are unnecessary, that cars are evil, yet some irrational city dwellers continue to hold onto them for purely egoistic reasons. According to the authors, there are about 4 million cars in Moscow – or 5 million if you count commuters from the suburbs. That’s too many, they say... From a driver’s perspective, this framing can feel biased, as if the next step might involve efforts to reduce car usage – like raising parking fees, for example. Parking in Moscow’s Kitay-Gorod area in the center of the city already costs 600 rubles per hour.

So! The research team from CIAN split their study into two parts: qualitative and quantitative. The first included personal experiences and 12 in-depth interviews, while the second involved surveys of CIAN’s service users, with approximately 1000 responses collected. I share the jury’s sentiment that this sample size is insufficient; it seems the team relied too heavily on the internal capabilities of their own system.

"What do you need a car for?" survey. 3rd place


After presenting several tables to confirm some basic intuitions – that driving is more comfortable, especially with children, for shopping, and when heading out of the city...

  • zooming
    1 / 7
    "What do you need a car for?" survey. 3rd place
  • zooming
    2 / 7
    "What do you need a car for?" survey. 3rd place
    Copyright: “CIAN” team, "Explore the City!" competition, Genplan Institute of Moscow, 2024.
  • zooming
    3 / 7
    "What do you need a car for?" survey. 3rd place
    Copyright: “CIAN” team, "Explore the City!" competition, Genplan Institute of Moscow, 2024.
  • zooming
    4 / 7
    "What do you need a car for?" survey. 3rd place
    Copyright: “CIAN” team, "Explore the City!" competition, Genplan Institute of Moscow, 2024.
  • zooming
    5 / 7
    "What do you need a car for?" survey. 3rd place
    Copyright: “CIAN” team, "Explore the City!" competition, Genplan Institute of Moscow, 2024.
  • zooming
    6 / 7
    "What do you need a car for?" survey. 3rd place
    Copyright: “CIAN” team, "Explore the City!" competition, Genplan Institute of Moscow, 2024.
  • zooming
    7 / 7
    "What do you need a car for?" survey. 3rd place
    Copyright: “CIAN” team, "Explore the City!" competition, Genplan Institute of Moscow, 2024.


The authors cometo a simple conclusion:

"What do you need a car for?" survey. 3rd place


People use their own cars for commuting to work or school, shopping, and with children. Choosing public transport, on the other hand, is a rational decision to avoid traffic jams and calculate routes more efficiently. However, improvements in the frequency and comfort of public transportation in recent years also play a role. Still, for emotional reasons, people are more likely to choose scooters and bicycles. All of this is true and aligns with personal intuitions – at least mine. This leads to the question: why conduct a study just to confirm what is already obvious?

Probably anticipating the intuitive nature of their conclusions, the authors accompanied their presentation with a small “mise en scène” featuring two characters: a woman with children and a man without, which brought some liveliness to the expert defense session.

4th place
“Light in the window”


Determining the Vacancy of Residential Housing
Curator: Grigory Yushin, Head of Data Analytics for Territorial Planning; Denis Murataev
Participants: Team “Urban Helper”: Pavel Semin, Tatyana Baltyzhakova, Yulia Rodikova, Valeria Palich, Vyacheslav Ivanis, Ulyana Zudilova, Yesilzaveta Evrasova


Yulia Rodikova. “Explore the City” competition, presentation of research results.


The project was presented by Yulia Rodikova, who introduced herself as the leader, occasionally communicating via video link with some mysterious Pasha, whom she referred to as the author of the algorithm.

UPD 25.11.2024: Some project authors like to request revisions after their text is published. “Urban Helper” is one of these teams. For example, Yulia Rodikova asked us to correct the text several times, such as: “It would also be polite for you to refer to the author not as “Pasha”, as I called my AI during the presentation, but as Pavel Semin, as he is listed among the authors”. We are correcting that. The algorithm’s author is evidently Pavel Semin. However, what “my AI” refers to remains a mystery to this day. Was it named after the algorithm’s author? The questions seem to multiply.

After providing examples of similar foreign studies and evaluating their applicability...

  • zooming
    “Light in the Window”. 4th place
  • zooming
    “Light in the Window” 4th place
    Copyright: “Urban Helper” team, "Explore the City!" competition, Genplan Institute of Moscow, 2024.


The authors chose an analysis method based on the type of balconies, focused on the most common panel building series I-515, and then: they took panoramic shots from Yandex, marked them, made assumptions about the occupancy of the apartment, and classified the images – all manually. They did, however, use a pre-trained model called Segment Anything. Information about the model is provided here. The link to its description and code, however, is no longer valid. UPD 25.11.2024: Yulia Rodikova, again, sent us a link that she described as valid. Here it is.

Next, the authors discuss their methodology for determining the vacancy of apartments, highlighting the use of open data and the relative simplicity of the calculations as its advantages. Without pretending to fully understand the reasoning behind Moran’s index, which underlies spatial autocorrelation and allows the authors to bring together several assumptions, I’ll just note that the link to the code for their methodology works, and here it is.

The maps and analytics are available here. It’s quite interesting to review them, for example, it shows that Kommunarka leads in apartment vacancy, and that vacancy increases progressively to the southwest.

  • zooming
    1 / 7
    “Light in the Window”. 4th place
  • zooming
    2 / 7
    “Light in the Window”. 4th place
    Copyright: “Urban Helper” team, "Explore the City!" competition, Genplan Institute of Moscow, 2024.
  • zooming
    3 / 7
    “Light in the Window” 4th place
    Copyright: “Center” Agency, "Explore the City!" competition, Genplan Institute of Moscow, 2024
  • zooming
    4 / 7
    “Light in the Window” 4th place
    Copyright: “Urban Helper” team, "Explore the City!" competition, Genplan Institute of Moscow, 2024.
  • zooming
    5 / 7
    “Light in the Window” 4th place
    Copyright: “Urban Helper” team, "Explore the City!" competition, Genplan Institute of Moscow, 2024.
  • zooming
    6 / 7
    “Light in the Window” 4th place
    Copyright: “Urban Helper” team, "Explore the City!" competition, Genplan Institute of Moscow, 2024.
  • zooming
    7 / 7
    “Light in the Window” 4th place
    Copyright: “Urban Helper” team, "Explore the City!" competition, Genplan Institute of Moscow, 2024.


I still cherish hope that the data presented is indeed justified. However, it is hard to rely on its absolute accuracy, especially since the explanation of the methodology can hardly be described as clear. Additionally, and this is just my subjective opinion, it seems unlikely that apartment occupancy can be accurately determined through open sources without resorting to data from housing utilities or mobile phones. Another statement from the authors that remains unclear to me is their claim that the analysis method based on lighting is considered unpromising.

***

Clearly, the competition is not trivial, and the tasks are far from simple. Some of them may not have a definitive solution under current conditions or may require considerable time and effort. Nonetheless, it is impressive that four teams managed, in varying degrees of detail, to address their tasks and respond to questions. The complexity is illustrated by the fact that the fifth team dropped out of the competition.

The jury of the “Explore the City” competition:
Yulianna Knyazhevskaya – Chair of the Jury, Chair of Moskomarkhitecture
Sergey Kuznetsov – Chief Architect of Moscow
Sergey Kostin – Deputy Chair of the Moscow Chamber of Architects
Tatyana Guk – Director of the Genplan Institute of Moscow
Igor Bakhiyev – Deputy Director of the Genplan Institute of Moscow
Grigory Mustafin – Chief Architect of the Genplan Institute of Moscow
Tatyana Polidi – Vice President of the “Institute of the Economy of the City” Foundation
Yuri Sheredega – Architect, Partner and Co-Founder of Sheredega Consulting Design and Consulting Bureau
Kirill Puzanov – Scientific Supervisor of the Master’s Program in “Digital Urbanism and City Analytics” at HSE University
Ivan Dementyev – Deputy Director of the Moscow Transport Museum for Research and Development
Kirill Zhanydarov – Director of the Transport Department of the Skolkovo Foundation
Yulia Tarabarina – Editor-in-Chief of ARCHI.RU
Timur Bashkaev – Architect, Head of the ABTB LLC
Dmitry Sukhov – Creative Director of Genpro

25 November 2024

Headlines now
Four Different Surveys
The “Explore the City” competition, organized this year by the Genplan Institute of Moscow, stands out as a pretty unconventional one for the architectural field but aligns perfectly well with the character of urban planning work. The winning project analyzed contemporary residential complexes, combining urban planning insights with a realtor’s perspective to propose a hybrid approach. Other entries explored public centers, motivations for car ownership, and housing vacancy rates. A fifth participant withdrew. Here’s a closer look at the four completed works.
Scheduled Evolution
ASADOV Architects unveiled the EvyCenter pavilion, a microcultural hub for fostering personal growth, organizing workshops, and doing gymnastics. Additionally, this pavilion serves as a prototype for a scalable country house, drawing inspiration from the “Loskutok” project, and constructed from CLT panels in a factory. This marks the beginning of a developer project initiated by the architectural firm (sic!), which is seeking partners to expand both small Evy settlements and even larger Evy cities, which are, according to Andrey Asadov, aimed at fostering the “evolutionary” development of the people who will inhabit them.
The Golden Crown
The concept for a dental clinic in Yekaterinburg, developed by CNTR Studio, revolves around the idea of a “mouth full of gold”: pristine white porcelain stoneware walls are complemented by matte brass details. To avoid an overly literal interpretation, the architects focused on the building’s proportions, skillfully navigating between sunlight requirements and fire safety regulations.
Flexibility and Integration
Not long ago, we covered the project for the fourth phase of the ÁLIA residential complex, designed by APEX. Now, we’ve been shown different fence concepts they developed to enclose the complex’s private courtyards, incorporating a variety of public functions. We believe that the sheer fact that the complex’s architects were involved in such a detail as fencing speaks volumes.
A Step Forward
The HIDE residential complex represents a major milestone for ADM architects and their leaders Andrey Romanov and Ekaterina Kuznetsova in their quest for a fresh high-rise aesthetic – one that is flexible and layered, capable of bringing vibrancy to mass and silhouette while shaping form. Over recent years, this approach has become ADM’s “signature style”, with the golden HIDE tower playing a pivotal role in its evolution. Here, we delve into the project’s story, explore the details of the complex’s design, and uncover its core essence.
Gold in the Sands
A new office for a transcontinental company specializing in resource extraction and processing has opened in Dubai. Designed by T+T Architects, masters of creating spaces that are contemporary, diverse, flexible, and original, this project exemplifies their expertise. On the executive floor, a massive brass-clad partition dominates, while layered textures of compressed earth create a contextually resonant backdrop.
Layers and Levels of Flight
This project goes way back – Reserve Union won this architectural competition at the end of 2011, and the building was completed in 2018, so it’s practically “archival”. However, despite being relatively unknown, the building can hardly be considered “dated” and remains a prime example of architectural expression, particularly in the headquarters genre. And it’s especially fitting for an aviation company office. In some ways, it resembles the Aeroflot headquarters at Sheremetyevo but with its own unique identity, following the signature style of Vladimir Plotkin. In this article, we take an in-depth look at the United Aircraft Corporation (UAC) headquarters in the Moscow agglomeration town of Zhukovsky, supplemented by recent photographs from Alexey Naroditsky – a shoot that became only recently possible due to the fact that improvements were finally made in the surrounding area.
Light and Shadow
In this article, we delve into the architectural design of the “Chaika” house by DNK ag architects, which was recently completed in 2023 as part of the collection of signature designs at ZILArt. As is well-known, all the buildings in this complex follow a design code, yet each one is distinct. This particular building stands out not only for its whiteness and minimalism but also for the refined use of a limited number of techniques that, together, create what can confidently be called synergy.
Casus Novae
A master plan was developed for a large residential area with a name of “DNS City”, but now that its implementation began, the plan has been arbitrarily reformatted and replaced with something that, while similar on the surface, is actually quite different. This is not the first time such a thing happens, but it’s always frustrating. With permission from the author, we are sharing Maria Elkina’s post.
Treasure Hunting
The GAFA bureau, in collaboration with Tegola and Arkhitail, organized an expedition to the island of Kilpola in Karelia as part of Moskomarkhitektura’s “Open City” festival. There, amidst moss and rocks, the students sought answers to questions like: what is the sacred, where does it dwell, and what sustains it? Assisting the participants in this quest were landscape engineer Evgeny Levin, artist Nicholas Roerich, a moose, and the lack of cellular connection. Here’s how the story unfolded.
Depths of the Earth, Streams of Water
In the Malaya Okhta district, the Akzent building, designed by Stepan Liphart, was constructed. It follows a classic tripartite structure, yet it’s what you might call “hand-drawn”: each façade is unique in its form and details, some of which aren’t immediately noticeable. In this article, we explore the context and, together with the architect, delve into how the form was developed.
Fir Tree Dynamics
The “Airports of Region” holding is planning to build an airport in Karachay-Cherkessia, aiming to make the Arkhyz and Dombay resorts more accessible to travelers. The project that won in an invitation-only competition, submitted by Sergey Nikeshkin’s KPLN, blends natural imagery inspired by the shape of a conifer seed, open-air waiting spaces, majestic large trees, and a green roof elevated on needle-like columns. The result is both nature-inspired and WOW.
​A Brick Shell
In the process of designing a clubhouse situated among pine trees in a prestigious suburban area near Moscow, the architectural firm “A.Len” did the façade design part. The combination of different types of brick and masonry correlates with the volumetric and plastique solutions, further enhanced by the inclusion of wood-painted fragments and metal “glazing”.
Word Forms
ATRIUM architects love ambitious challenges, and for the firm’s thirtieth anniversary, they boldly play a game of words with an exhibition that dives deep into a self-created vocabulary. They immerse their projects – especially art installations – into this glossary, as if plunging into a current of their own. You feel as if you’re flowing through the veins of pure art, immersed in a universe of vertical cities, educational spaces – of which the architects are true masters – and the cultural codes of various locations. But what truly captivates is the bold statement that Vera Butko and Anton Nadtochy make, both through their work and this exhibition: architecture, above all, is art – the art of working with form and space.
Flexibility and Acuteness of Modernity
Luxurious, fluid, large “kokoshniks” and spiral barrel columns, as if made from colorful chewing gum: there seem to be no other mansion like this in Moscow, designed in the “Neo-Russian-Modern” style. And the “Teremok” on Malaya Kaluzhskaya, previously somewhat obscure, has “come alive with new colors” and gained visibility after its restoration for the office of the “architectural ecosystem” as the architects love to call themselves. It’s evident that Julius Borisov and the architects at UNK put their hearts into finding this new office and bringing it up to date. Let’s delve into the paradoxes of this mansion’s history and its plasticity. Spoiler: two versions of modernity meet here, both balancing on the razor’s edge of “what’s current”.
Yuri Vissarionov: “A modular house does not belong to the land”
It belongs to space, or to the air... It turns out that 3D printing is more effective when combined with a modular approach: the house is built in a workshop and then adapted to the site, including on uneven terrain. Yuri Vissarionov shares his latest experience in designing tourist complexes, both in central Russia and in the south. These include houseboats, homes printed from lightweight concrete using a 3D printer, and, of course, frame houses.
​Moscow’s First
“The quality of education largely depends on the quality of the educational environment”. This principle of the last decade has been realized by Sergey Skuratov in the project for the First Moscow Gymnasium on Rostovskaya Embankment in the Khamovniki district. The building seamlessly integrates into the complex urban landscape, responding both to the pedestrian flow of the city and the quiet alleyways. It skillfully takes advantage of the height differences and aligns with modern trends in educational space design. Let’s take a closer look.
Looking at the Water
The site of Villa Sonata stretches from the road to the water’s edge, offering its own shoreline, pier, and a picturesque river panorama. To reveal these sweeping views, Roman Leonidov “cut” the façade diagonally parallel to the river, thus getting two main axes for the house and, consequently, “two heads”. The internal core – two double-height spaces, a living room and a conservatory, with a “bridge” above them – makes the house both “transparent” and filled with light.
The White Wing
Well, it’s not exactly white. It’s more of a beige, white-stone structure that plays with the color of limestone – smoother surfaces are lighter, while rougher ones are darker. This wing unites various elements: it absorbs and interprets the surrounding themes. It responds to everything, yet maintains a cohesive expression – a challenging task! – while also incorporating recognizable features of its own, such as the dynamic cuts at the bottom, top, and middle.
Urban Dunes
The XSA Ramps team designed and built a three-part sports hub for a park in Rostov-on-Don, welcoming people of all ages and fitness levels. The skate plaza, pump track, and playground are all meticulously crafted with details that attract a diverse range of visitors. The technical execution of the shapes and slopes transforms this space into a kind of sculptural composition.
Proportional Growth
The project for the fourth phase of the ÁLIA residential area has been announced. The buildings are situated on an elongated plot – almost a “ray” that shoots out from the center of the area towards the river. Their layout reflects both a response to Moscow’s architectural preferences over the past 15 years, shifting “from blocks to towers”, and an interpretation of the neighboring business park designed by SOM. Additionally, the best apartments here are not located at the very top but closer to the middle, forming a glowing “waistline”.
The “Staircase” Building
In designing the “Details” residential complex in New Moscow, Rais Baishev spiced up the now-popular Moscow theme of a “courtyard” building with an idea drawn from the surrealist drawings by Maurits Escher. He envisioned the stepped silhouettes and descending slopes as a metaphysical mega-staircase, creating a key void within the courtyard that gave the project an internal “spine”. This concept is felt both in the building’s silhouette and on its façades.
Projection of the Quarter
No one doubted that the building that Vladimir Plotkin designed as part of the “Garden Quarters” would be the most modernist of all. And it turned out just that way: while adhering to the common design code, the building successfully combines brick and white stone, rhythmically responding to the neighboring building designed by Ostozhenka, yet tactfully and persistently making a few statements of its own. This includes the projection of the ideal urban development composition “14–9–6”, which can be found right next door, mathematical calculations, including those for various types of terraces (and perhaps the only reminder of the Soviet past of the Kauchuk rubber factory!), and the white “cross-stitch” pattern of the façade grid.
Domus Aurea
In this issue, we examine the “Tessinsky-1” house, designed by Sergey Skuratov and completed in 2023. Located in the middle of the Serebryanicheskaya Embankment district, at the intersection of its main streets, this house assumes a sort of “nodal” role: it not only responds to everything around it and preserves many memories of the former EMA factory within itself, but it weaves all this into a newly directed pattern, reconciling bright “gold” and dark-colored brick, largely with the help of the new, modern-yet-archaic Columba brick, which, come to think about it, is the most precious element here.
The Chimney of Nikola-Lenivets
In this issue, we are examining the “Obelisk House” designed by KATARSIS and built for the Arkhstoyanie 2023 festival. However, it was only finished later on, and this is why we are examining it now. It seems to us that after the “Obelisk House” appeared in Nikola-Lenivets, a dialogue and a few inner connections appeared between the temporary structures built here. These houses no longer look like “accidental neighbors”, more of which below.
​Periscope by the Bay
The jury awarded the second place in the competition for a public and cultural center in Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky to the companies GORA (“Mountain”) and M4. In the consortium’s proposal, the building resembles a sperm whale with a calf swimming next to it or a periscope, whose lenses capture the most spectacular views from the surrounding landscape.
From Arcs to Dolmens
While working on the competition project for Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky, ASADOV Architects prioritized the value of the natural and urban environment, aiming to preserve the balance of the location while minimizing the resemblance of the volume that they designed to a “traditional building”. The task was challenging, and the architects created three versions, one of which having been developed after the competition, where their main proposal took third place. However, the point of interest here is not the competition result but the continuity of creative thinking.
Hide and Seek
The ID Moskovskiy house, designed by Stepan Liphart in St. Petersburg, in the courtyards near Moskovskiy Avenue beyond the Obvodny Canal and recently completed, is notable for several reasons. Firstly, it has been realized with considerable accuracy, which is particularly significant as this is the first building where the architect was responsible not only for the facades but also for the layouts, allowing for better integration between the two. On the other hand, this building is interesting as an example of the “germination” of new architecture in the city: it draws on the best examples from the neighborhood and becomes an improved and developed sum of ideas found by the architect in the surrounding context.
The Big Twelve
Yesterday, the winners of the Moscow Mayor’s Architecture Award were announced and honored. Let’s take a look at what was awarded and, in some cases, even critique this esteemed award. After all, there is always room for improvement, right?
Above the Golden Horn
The residential complex “Philosophy” designed by T+T architects in Vladivostok, is one of the new projects in the “Golubinaya Pad” area, changing its development philosophy (pun intended) from single houses to a comprehensive approach. The buildings are organized along public streets, varying in height and format, with one house even executed in gallery typology, featuring a cantilever leaning on an art object.