По-русски

Arma: Improvement

What has been improved in the “Arma” site and around it – and how.

08 April 2016
Object
mainImg

Over the last five years, the very concept of “site improvement” has already become hoary, and has convinced everyone of its importance. The notion of commercial value of architecture has finally grown outside from within: from the beautiful interior of the 90s, through the beautiful façade of the 2000s – up to the understanding of the value of a conveniently equipped urban space. In this case, there are two projects: the architects of Sergey Kiselev & Partners designed the site improvement of the former factory in 2012, implemented it in 2014-2015, and worked on the adjacent the Nijniy Susalny lane in 2015, having the whole work finished by the City Day in September. Two projects – one goal: to bring the space of the former factory and its surrounding area to shape. So, it all calls for having a look at the whole improvement of “Arma”.

It has at least two special features. First, the means are rather economical and minimalistic, with no claim either to modernistic luxury of materials, or to Biedermeier with curving backs of the benches – that we so much enjoy on Moscow boulevards. Perhaps, it is due to the creativity of the block – so its residents would treat any frills ironically by definition; but it cannot be ruled out that it were the beliefs of the chief architect of both improvement projects – Alexey Medvedev – a confirmed minimalist, but the improvement turned out to be in a severe “factory-like” style. And quite right: some trinkets would look quite out of place next to a brick tube growing out of the ground, or a gas valve, growing out of the wall. The place itself dictates the approach. At the same time, compared to the neighboring art-blocks of Vinzavod (Rus. “winery”) and Artplay, whose improvement is hardly noticeable – if in fact present, the effort invested here is much more significant.

Arma: pedestrian boulevard between units 3 and 4 © Sergey Kiselev and Partners. Photo © Julia Tarabarina, 2016
Arma: site improvement. Bird's height view. Visualization, 2012 © Sergey Kiselev and Partners.


Arma: site improvement. © Sergey Kiselev and Partners. Photograph © Julia Tarabarina


Elements of site improvement concentrate towards the center and rarely at the periphery, searching the territory for a coziness of the pedestrian “nucleus” and leaving the outer contours to vehicles. The main hero here is a pedestrian boulevard between the 3d and 4th buildings with the mentioned tube and valve. The architects used corten steel here – a brutal material, but not at all cheap, just from the artistic kind. It coats the flower-beds lifted up to a knee-level and framing the wooden benches. On the other side, is a line of street-lights made in tubes of milk glass, setting the same, not very high man-oriented scale. This is a boulevard for sitting around and chatting, to stop for a while and catch breath.  

Arma: site improvement. © Sergey Kiselev and Partners. Photograph © Julia Tarabarina


Arma: site improvement. © Sergey Kiselev and Partners. Photograph © Julia Tarabarina


Arma: site improvement. © Sergey Kiselev and Partners. Photograph © Julia Tarabarina
      

The second boulevard coincides with the main axis and is on the contrary very mobile. It is longitudinally divided between the cars coming from the Nijniy Susalny lane through Check-point No.1 and pedestrians. The dividing line is formed by a line of lights – good modern street-lamps, lighting both sides. The pedestrian part, following the change of height (which exceeds 2 meters on “Arma” territory), is also divided in two: the higher and lower ones. The first adjoins the motor-car area, and leads inside and even straight through. The second one lies about 1,5 meters lower – we go down the steps to get here, and from this point, we can arrive in buildings 4-5: here the traffic slows down, and the mini-boulevard becomes a mini-square.    

Arma: site improvement. © Sergey Kiselev and Partners. Photograph © Julia Tarabarina


Arma: site improvement. © Sergey Kiselev and Partners. Photograph © Julia Tarabarina
  

The two boulevards are the axle of this space and its inner life, but they also have some branches: after completion of all works, the park with the Great Patriotic War monument between buildings 3 and 1 will be evidently stretched into a pedestrian and automobile side street; the area between gas-holders and building 5 has been already turned into a park with round lawns, where the Moscow girls arrange photo-sets.    

Arma: site improvement. © Sergey Kiselev and Partners. Photograph © Julia Tarabarina


Arma: site improvement. © Sergey Kiselev and Partners. Photograph © Julia Tarabarina


Arma: site improvement. © Sergey Kiselev and Partners. Photograph © Julia Tarabarina


Arma: site improvement. © Sergey Kiselev and Partners. Photograph © Julia Tarabarina


Arma: pedestrian zone improvement. © Sergey Kiselev and Partners. Photograph © Julia Tarabarina


Another peculiar feature is the openness of the territory, at which every industrial zone reconstruction in Moscow is rhetorically aimed, but ultimately closes in anyway – fully or emotionally – and places such check-points, where one would hardly try to enter for no good reason. Here, it is a bit different: people enter through freely and stay inside rather leisurely. The authors managed to create an inner-city district. It can be clearly felt that this territory has been added to the city and has the potential of further development. Certainly, providing four exits also matters greatly for the effect of openness: two from Nijniy Susalny lane, one from Mruzovskiy and the fourth entrance point – for the ones who are aware – from a nameless lane at the northeast corner.      

Nijniy Susalny lane, formerly overloaded with height discontinuity and snack stands, has been cleared, improved and presented to the city. All the height differences have been considered and used to create a “stepping” space with natural lawns and wide flights of steps – it has become much easier to breathe in here, the “gorge” feeling has been replaced with the delight from unpredictable Moscow relief: partly bluff, partly flat. 

Arma: pedestrian zone improvement. © Sergey Kiselev and Partners. Photograph © Julia Tarabarina


Arma: the main entrance. Version 1. Visualization, 2015 © Sergey Kiselev and Partners



 

where:Russia, Moscow
date2012 — 2013 / 2013 — 2015
function:Masterplanning / Landscaping
studio:
Sergey Kisselev & Partners
http://www.sk-p.ru/
architect:Alexey MedvedevVladimir Labutin
  • zooming
    1 / 7
  • zooming
    2 / 7
  • zooming
    3 / 7
  • zooming
    4 / 7
  • zooming
    5 / 7
  • zooming
    6 / 7
    Arma: site improvement. © Sergey Kiselev and Partners. Photograph © Julia Tarabarina
  • zooming
    7 / 7

where:Russia, Moscow
date2012 — 2014 / 2014 — 2015
function:Masterplanning / Landscaping
studio:
Sergey Kisselev & Partners
http://www.sk-p.ru/
architect:Alexey Medvedev
  • zooming
    1 / 7
    Arma: pedestrian zone improvement. © Sergey Kiselev and Partners. Photograph © Julia Tarabarina
  • zooming
    2 / 7
  • zooming
    3 / 7
  • zooming
    4 / 7
    Arma: pedestrian zone improvement. © Sergey Kiselev and Partners. Photograph © Julia Tarabarina
  • zooming
    5 / 7
  • zooming
    6 / 7
  • zooming
    7 / 7


08 April 2016

Headlines now
The Big Twelve
Yesterday, the winners of the Moscow Mayor’s Architecture Award were announced and honored. Let’s take a look at what was awarded and, in some cases, even critique this esteemed award. After all, there is always room for improvement, right?
Above the Golden Horn
The residential complex “Philosophy” designed by T+T architects in Vladivostok, is one of the new projects in the “Golubinaya Pad” area, changing its development philosophy (pun intended) from single houses to a comprehensive approach. The buildings are organized along public streets, varying in height and format, with one house even executed in gallery typology, featuring a cantilever leaning on an art object.
Nuanced Alternative
How can you rhyme a square and space? Easily! But to do so, you need to rhyme everything you can possibly think of: weave everything together, like in a tensegrity structure, and find your own optics too. The new exhibition at GES-2 does just that, offering its visitor a new perspective on the history of art spanning 150 years, infused with the hope for endless multiplicity of worlds and art histories. Read on to see how this is achieved and how the exhibition design by Evgeny Ace contributes to it.
Blinds for Ice
An ice arena has been constructed in Domodedovo based on a project by Yuri Vissarionov Architects. To prevent the long façade, a technical requirement for winter sports facilities, from appearing monotonous, the architects proposed the use of suspended structures with multidirectional slats. This design protects the ice from direct sunlight while giving the wall texture and detail.
Campus within a Day
In this article, we talk about what the participants of Genplan Institute of Moscow’s hackathon were doing at the MosComArchitecture booth at the “ArchMoscow” exhibition. We also discuss who won the prize and why, and what can be done with the territory of a small university on the outskirts of Moscow.
Vertical Civilization
Genpro considered the development of the vertical city concept and made it the theme of their pavilion at the “ArchMoscow” exhibition.
Marina Yegorova: “We think in terms of hectares, not square meters”
The career path of architect Marina Yegorova is quite impressive: MARHI, SPEECH, MosComArchitectura, the Genplan Institute of Moscow, and then her own architectural company. Its name Empate, which refers to the words “to draw” in Portuguese and “to empathize” in English, should not be misleading with its softness, as the firm freely works on different scales, including Integrated Territorial Development projects. We talked with Marina about various topics: urban planning experience, female leadership style, and even the love of architects for yachting.
Andrey Chuikov: “Optimum balance is achieved through economics”
The Yekaterinburg-based architectural company CNTR is in its mature stage: crystallization of principles, systematization, and standardization helped it make a qualitative leap, enhance competencies, and secure large contracts without sacrificing the aesthetic component. The head of the company, Andrey Chuikov, told us about building a business model and the bonuses that additional education in financial management provides for an architect.
The Fulcrum
Ostozhenka Architects have designed two astonishing towers practically on the edge of a slope above the Oka River in Nizhny Novgorod. These towers stand on 10-meter-tall weathered steel “legs”, with each floor offering panoramic views of the river and the city; all public spaces, including corridors, receive plenty of natural light. Here, we see a multitude of solutions that are unconventional for the residential routine of our day and age. Meanwhile, although these towers hark back to the typological explorations of the seventies, they are completely reinvented in a contemporary key. We admire Veren Group as the client – this is exactly how a “unique product” should be made – and we tell you exactly how our towers are arranged.
Crystal is Watching You
Right now, Museum Night has kicked off at the Museum of Architecture, featuring a fresh new addition – the “Crystal of Perception”, an installation by Sergey Kuznetsov, Ivan Grekov, and the KROST company, set up in the courtyard. It shimmers with light, it sings, it reacts to the approach of people, and who knows what else it can do.
The Secret Briton
The house is called “Little France”. Its composition follows the classical St. Petersburg style, with a palace-like courtyard. The decor is on the brink of Egyptian lotuses, neo-Greek acroteria, and classic 1930s “gears”; the recessed piers are Gothic, while the silhouette of the central part of the house is British. It’s quite interesting to examine all these details, attempting to understand which architectural direction they belong to. At the same time, however, the house fits like a glove in the context of the 20th line of St. Petersburg’s Vasilievsky Island; its elongated wings hold up the façade quite well.
The Wrap-Up
The competition project proposed by Treivas for the first 2021 competition for the Russian pavilion at EXPO 2025 concludes our series of publications on pavilion projects that will not be implemented. This particular proposal stands out for its detailed explanations and the idea of ecological responsibility: both the facades and the exhibition inside were intended to utilize recycled materials.
Birds and Streams
For the competition to design the Omsk airport, DNK ag formed a consortium, inviting VOX architects and Sila Sveta. Their project focuses on intersections, journeys, and flights – both of people and birds – as Omsk is known as a “transfer point” for bird migrations. The educational component is also carefully considered, and the building itself is filled with light, which seems to deconstruct the copper circle of the central entrance portal, spreading it into fantastic hyper-spatial “slices”.
Faraday Grid
The project of the Omsk airport by ASADOV Architects is another concept among the 14 finalists of a recent competition. It is called “The Bridge” and is inspired by both the West Siberian Exhibition of 1911 and the Trans-Siberian Railway bridge over the Irtysh River, built in 1896. On one hand, it carries a steampunk vibe, while on the other, there’s almost a sense of nostalgia for the heyday of 1913. However, the concept offers two variants, the second one devoid of nostalgia but featuring a parabola.
Midway upon the Journey of Our Life
Recently, Tatlin Publishing House released a book entitled “Architect Sergey Oreshkin. Selected Projects”. This book is not just a traditional book of the architectural company’s achievements, but rather a monograph of a more personal nature. The book includes 43 buildings as well as a section with architectural drawings. In this article, we reflect on the book as a way to take stock of an architect’s accomplishments.
Inverted Fortress
This year, there has been no shortage of intriguing architectural ideas around the Omsk airport. The project developed by the architectural company KPLN appeals to Omsk’s history as a wooden fortress that it was back in the day, but transforms the concept of a fortress beyond recognition: it “shaves off” the conical ends of “wooden logs”, then enlarges them, and then flips them over. The result is a hypostyle – a forest of conical columns on point supports, with skylights on top.
Transformation of Annenkirche
For Annenkirche (St. Anna Lutheran Church in St. Petersburg), Sergey Kuznetsov and the Kamen bureau have prepared a project that relies on the principles of the Venice Charter: the building is not restored to a specific date, historical layers are preserved, and modern elements do not mimic the authentic ones. Let’s delve into the details of these solutions.
The Paradox of the Temporary
The concept of the Russian pavilion for EXPO 2025 in Osaka, proposed by the Wowhaus architects, is the last of the six projects we gathered from the 2022 competition. It is again worth noting that the results of this competition were not finalized due to the cancellation of Russia’s participation in World Expo 2025. It should be mentioned that Wowhaus created three versions for this competition, but only one is being presented, and it can’t be said that this version is thoroughly developed – rather, it is done in the spirit of a “student assignment”. Nevertheless, the project is interesting in its paradoxical nature: the architects emphasized the temporary character of the pavilion, and in its bubble-like forms sought to reflect the paradoxes of space and time.
The Forum of Time
The competition project for the Russian Pavilion at EXPO 2025 in Osaka designed by Aleksey Orlov and Arena Project Institute consists of cones and conical funnels connected into a non-trivial composition, where one can feel the hand of architects who have worked extensively with stadiums and other sports facilities. It’s very interesting to delve into its logic, structurally built on the theme of clocks, hourglasses and even sundials. Additionally, the architects have turned the exhibition pavilion into a series of interconnected amphitheaters, which is also highly relevant for world exhibitions. We are reminding you that the competition results were never announced.
Mirrors Everywhere
The project by Sergey Nebotov, Anastasia Gritskova, and the architectural company “Novoe” was created for the Russian pavilion at EXPO 2025, but within the framework of another competition, which, as we learned, took place even earlier, in 2021. At that time, the competition theme was “digital twins”, and there was minimal time for work, so the project, according to the architect himself, was more of a “student assignment”. Nevertheless, this project is interesting for its plan bordering on similarity with Baroque projects and the emblem of the exhibition, as well as its diverse and comprehensive reflectiveness.
The Steppe Is Full of Beauty and Freedom
The goal of the exhibition “Dikoe Pole” (“Wild Field”) at the State Historical Museum was to move away from the archaeological listing of valuable items and to create an image of the steppe and nomads that was multidirectional and emotional – in other words, artistic. To achieve this goal, it was important to include works of contemporary art. One such work is the scenography of the exhibition space developed by CHART studio.
The Snowstorm Fish
The next project from the unfinished competition for the Russian Pavilion at EXPO 2025, which will be held in Osaka, Japan, is by Dashi Namdakov and Parsec Architects. The pavilion describes itself as an “architectural/sculptural” one, with its shape clearly reminiscent of abstract sculpture of the 1970s. It complements its program with a meditative hall named “Mendeleev’s Dreams”, and offers its visitors to slide from its roof at the end of the tour.
The Mirror of Your Soul
We continue to publish projects from the competition for the design of the Russian Pavilion at EXPO in Osaka 2025. We are reminding you that the results of the competition have not been announced, and hardly will ever be. The pavilion designed by ASADOV Architects combines a forest log cabin, the image of a hyper transition, and sculptures made of glowing threads – it focuses primarily on the scenography of the exhibition, which the pavilion builds sequentially like a string of impressions, dedicating it to the paradoxes of the Russian soul.
Part of the Ideal
In 2025, another World Expo will take place in Osaka, Japan, in which Russia will not participate. However, a competition for the Russian pavilion was indeed held, with six projects participating. The results were never announced as Russia’s participation was canceled; the competition has no winners. Nevertheless, Expo pavilion projects are typically designed for a bold and interesting architectural statement, so we’ve gathered all the six projects and will be publishing articles about them in random order. The first one is the project by Vladimir Plotkin and Reserve Union, which is distinguished by the clarity of its stereometric shape, the boldness of its structure, and the multiplicity of possible interpretations.
The Fortress by the River
ASADOV Architects have developed a concept for a new residential district in the center of Kemerovo. To combat the harsh climate and monotonous everyday life, the architects proposed a block type of development with dominant towers, good insolation, facades detailed at eye level, and event programming.
In the Rhombus Grid
Construction has begun on the building of the OMK (United Metallurgical Company) Corporate University in Nizhny Novgorod’s town of Vyksa, designed by Ostozhenka Architects. The most interesting aspect of the project is how the architects immersed it in the context: “extracting” a diagonal motif from the planning grid of Vyksa, they aligned the building, the square, and the park to match it. A truly masterful work with urban planning context on several different levels of perception has long since become the signature technique of Ostozhenka.
​Generational Connection
Another modern estate, designed by Roman Leonidov, is located in the Moscow region and brings together three generations of one family under one roof. To fit on a narrow plot without depriving anyone of personal space, the architects opted for a zigzag plan. The main volume in the house structure is accentuated by mezzanines with a reverse-sloped roof and ceilings featuring exposed beams.
Three Dimensions of the City
We began to delve into the project by Sergey Skuratov, the residential complex “Depo” in Minsk, located at Victory Square, and it fascinated us completely. The project has at least several dimensions to it: historical – at some point, the developer decided to discontinue further collaboration with Sergey Skuratov Architects, but the concept was approved, and its implementation continues, mostly in accordance with the proposed ideas. The spatial and urban planning dimension – the architects both argue with the city and play along with it, deciphering nuances, and finding axes. And, finally, the tactile dimension – the constructed buildings also have their own intriguing features. Thus, this article also has two parts: it dwells on what has been built and what was conceived
New “Flight”
Architects from “Mezonproject” have developed a project for the reconstruction of the regional youth center “Polyot”(“Flight”) in the city of Oryol. The summer youth center, built back in the late 1970s, will now become year-round and acquire many additional functions.
The Yauza Towers
In Moscow, there aren’t that many buildings or projects designed by Nikita Yavein and Studio 44. In this article, we present to you the concept of a large multifunctional complex on the Yauza River, located between two parks, featuring a promenade, a crossroads of two pedestrian streets, a highly developed public space, and an original architectural solution. This solution combines a sophisticated, asymmetric façade grid, reminiscent of a game of fifteen puzzle, and bold protrusions of the upper parts of the buildings, completely masking the technical floors and sculpting the complex’s silhouette.