Evgeny Novosadyuk: “Without triggers that will make you overcome something, you may never make it to the next level”

We talked to Evgeny Novosadyuk to find out how to go from an art school graduate to a partner of Studio 44. Spoiler: you will have to work a lot, miss sleep, and be in love with your city.

Interviewed by:
Alyona Kuznetsova
Translated by:
Anton Mizonov

07 September 2022

Interview

Archi.ru: Evgeny, how old are you?

Evgeny Novosadyuk: I am 34.

Can you please share about the time before Studio 44? Where did you study, where did you work, who were your teachers?

At some point, my parents asked me what I was going to be. I wanted to be neither a lawyer like my dad nor a veterinarian like my mom. One of the options was going to the Lyceum of the Academy of Fine Arts, and they had an architectural class there. And, after a certain hiatus, I did enter the Lyceum – back in junior high school, I did a lot of drawing, but later on I was more into sports, and I even got to the candidate for the master of sports in fencing.

At the same time, architecture was never far away: I really enjoyed walking downtown or visiting a museum. In addition, my uncle was an architect, but I only fully realized that after I entered the Lyceum. My subliminal passion for the city environment turned into a desire to take part in its creation.

Even now, having visited many architectural capitals of the world, a come back home from a business trip or a vacation, from Paris or from Rome, and I come to the five-corner building, see the embankments, and the avenues and think again and again – what a beautiful city we got!

zooming — Romantic park “Tuchkov Buyan”

Copyright: © Studio 44, West 8

What was your way from studying at the Academy of Fine Arts to landing a contract with Studio 44?

In the Academy, the students are immersed in an environment consisting of sturdy professionals, who define the mood and the trends of the architecture of St. Petersburg.

During the first year, the students are exposed to the basics of the profession, they study architectural graphics, wash drawing, and basic architectural elements. This is a classical school, and it’s great that it is preserved. By your second year, you need to choose a studio where you will study further, and you already know, with which of the professors you want to work, and with whom you expect the most interesting and the best results. By the end of your second year, you are quite at home with the material, and you communicate with older guys – this is a time-honored tradition in the Academy: since personal communication still matters a lot, the younger students are attached to doing purely technical tasks, and during the process of helping older guys they start thinking differently – a mutually beneficial experience.

I was able to continue my education in Vladimir Popov studio that had some of the best consultants in the Academy, and they are still in the public eye now: Yuri Zemtsov, Anatoly Stolyarchuk, Sergey Padalko, and, of course, Nikita Yavein. To get shortlisted for the studio, you need to have not so much good grades as interesting projects – if the professor sees your potential in them, you stand a better chance.

I started working for the studio at the end of my fourth year. A girl called me, whom I had helped a little with her diploma work in the Academy, and she said that technical help was needed in the project of an Almazov housing complex. Back then, I was interested in all kinds of things (well, so I am now, in fact) – and I agreed. But that was a bit of a challenge because, you know, a novice always has a hard time doing routine work. All these calculations – now they are made automatically, using special software, and back then it was done manually, and it was a nightmare. But you had to go through it – it was a valuable experience too.

There was also a time when I was periodically invited to help with competition projects – and I remember happy sleepless nights when we were preparing applications for the Astana railway station contest, and the Kazakhstan History Museum. These were significant milestones, after which the older guys in the Academy started to look differently upon you.

How did your career with the company develop? When and how did you become a partner?

Well, it was a sine wave. If you’re talking years, this is one figure – I became a partner in ten years, although in total I have worked for them for 12 years. If you’re talking about projects, this is a different figure and different scales, ranging from “paper” competition projects to actual working documentation. Perhaps, this is what I owe my success to – because I was able to accumulate the experience at different project stages.

A very important milestone for me was the project of Tuchkov Buyan, where I was the head of the group from the Russian side. It was then that my attitude towards what I was doing changed because I realized that the result directly depended on how much effort I invest in the project, and how I can organize myself and the guys from the group, and channel our energy to ultimately deliver a high-quality product no matter the circumstances. There was a challenge of mental character there as well: for a week and a half, we worked at the West 8 office – that was quite a shakeup, because we had to leave our comfort zone and work in someone else’s office with totally different design principles. And it was also important not to get lost in it, and stand our own ground. We ultimately won, surpassing Bjarke Ingels and Herzog & de Meuron – which is quite a result by any standards. The very situation made us grow up quickly. Without triggers that will make you overcome something, you may never make it to the next level.

Also, our leader, Nikita Yavein, organizes work in such a way that you now and then have no other choice than to grow professionally. And he provides opportunities for that by posing unconventional tasks that at some point give you full carte blanche. You think you’re not ready yet, but the task has already been set. If you cope with it, this means that you justified his trust, and if you don’t… frankly, I cannot remember such an occasion.

Why do you think Nikita Yavein took you on as a partner?

Probably, one of the big factors was that, despite the complexity of the tasks he would set for me, I never said “no, I think I’m pass” – rather, it was a “do or die” thing. Each next challenge makes you psychologically stronger, and you no longer have that inner tremor, or fear of doing something new, challenging, and complex. What is important, however, is not to think of yourself as a seasoned pro and loosen control – because there is an urban myth of high-altitude construction workers who tend to fall to their death from third or fourth floors – simply because they know how to handle much greater heights.

What changed after you received the partner statues, besides the volume of work? Does it make you feel different?

The partner status is not some kind of honorable medal, really. Rather, it is an advance, and a bar that you need to set higher and higher. And this adds to your responsibility for the end result. Besides, in addition to the professional tasks, you also start performing representative functions, such as interviews, lectures, and conferences.

What is your vision of the further development of your career? What would you want to be doing in 5/10/20 years from now? Do you have plans to start, perhaps, your own company?

I don’t look that far. I am totally engrossed in our current projects – they are exciting for me, and we have a great team. And I have quite enough of independence within the framework of Studio 44. And I see that I still have a lot to say at this stage, there is still room for the next step, and for further development – this is what matters the most to me.

What projects can you specifically mention since you became a partner?

The Tuchkov Buyan project proved that Studio 44 does have potential for working with landscape. After that, there were two park projects – a linear one in the “Galaktika” housing project, and a contest project in Murmansk. Park projects now lie within the area of our interests. Another interesting project for us was the Rosatom one – the National Center for Physics and Mathematics in the city of Sarov. Currently, we are doing a mountain resort not far away from Sochi.

Studio 44 intensively promotes and develops BIM-design, and creates its own software. This allows us to work on projects with complex terrain and non–standard source data – we can simulate the situation and adequately calculate costs.

Are there projects that you do outside your main area of work?

When I first came to work for Studio 44, George Snezhkin was still working here. Once we decided to go to an architectural festival, not even really knowing each other – George Snezhkin, Andrey Voronov, Kesha Padalko, and Sasha Berzing. We all hopped in Kesha’s car and went to that festival in Latvia, where we did a project of a floating stage, and where we ultimately won. At the award ceremony, they jokingly called us “Lesosplav” (“Timber Rafting”) – the name stuck and existed for about 3 or 4 years. Back then, there were a lot of festivals, and we did various competition projects, one of them being a temple made from hay, like a giant haystack, for which we received the “Echo Leonidova” award, and another one, which was a “Rocket Hostel”. The studio was OK with letting us go on such creative “escapades”, and they gave me an outlet beyond routine work. I would wish such an auto-training to everyone.

Today, despite my being insanely busy, I sometimes do find time to independently participate in a competition. More often than not I have to refrain from it, but sometimes I just can’t walk past. For example, when the “Resurs Periferii” (“Periphery Resources”) competition attracted me with an opportunity to make a positive difference to the sleeping-belt areas, and propose a model that could be duplicated by other cities. Taking part in such serious events is all about team work – you don’t do large competitions single-handed, you need a team of like-minded people.

There are less obliging stories as well. For example, there was a “brick” competition conducted by the “Project Baltia” magazine, which gave me an opportunity to speak my mind about the trucks with decorations that I see every time walking down Rubinstein Street.

I also teach in the Academy of Fine Arts, and consult in Nikita Yavein’s studio. Finding myself in the Academy was a very exciting experience for me.

Still recently, you were a student, and now you are a respected teacher, as if it wasn’t you running around red-eyed with your papers a while back. For now, in the studio I play the part of an interpreter or an adaptor. Nikita Yavein reads his course with unbelievable enthusiasm, but sometimes he speaks from the height of his experience in a language that is rather profession-specific, and hard to understand for the novices. If I see that the students do not understand this or that specific term, I pull them aside and explain it. They will feel more comfortable asking naive questions to me than to the big man. And my help delivers results because the guys grow from project to project – a great moment for the teacher that proves that my work was not in vain.

What are your interests outside of architecture?

My dad shared with me that he did a lot of mountaineering and yachting. And I wondered where he found the time. And now I like snowboarding, and I have a yacht driving license. My son and daughter are almost grown-ups now, they clearly formulate their thoughts, and I have fun being around them. I usually spend my free time with a book – it’s either specialized literature or classics. I try to stop the lacunae in my education, but, like they say, the more you know the more you realize that you don’t know anything”.

07 September 2022

Headlines now

Object

The Colorful City

While working on a large-scale project in Moscow’s Kuntsevo district – one that has yet to be given a name – Kleinewelt Architekten proposed not only a diverse array of tower silhouettes in “Empire-style” hues and a thoughtful mix of building heights, creating a six-story “neo-urbanist” city with a block-based layout at ground level, but also rooted their design in historical and contextual reasoning. The project includes the reconstruction of several Stalin-era residential buildings that remain from the postwar town of Kuntsevo, as well as the reconstruction of a 1953 railway station that was demolished in 2017.

Object

In Orbit of Moscow City

The Orbital business center is both simple and complex. Simple in its minimalist form and optimal office layout solution: a central core, a light-filled façade, plenty of glass; and from the unusual side – a technical floor cleverly placed at the building’s side ends. Complex – well, if only because it resembles a celestial body hovering on metallic legs near Magistralnaya Street. Why this specific shape, what it consists of, and what makes this “boutique” office building (purchased immediately after its completion) so unique – all of this and more is covered in our story.

Object

The Altai Ornament

The architectural company Empate has developed the concept for an eco-settlement located on a remote site in Altai. The master plan, which resembles a traditional ornament or even a utopian city, forms a clear system of public and private spaces. The architects also designed six types of houses for the settlement, drawing inspiration from the region’s culture, folklore, and vernacular building practices.

Object

Pro Forma

Photos have emerged of the newly completed whisky distillery in Chernyakhovsk, designed by TOTEMENT / PAPER – a continuation of their earlier work on the nearby Cognac Museum. From what is, in essence, a merely technical and utilitarian volume and space, the architects have created a fully-fledged theatre of impressions. Let’s take a closer look. We highly recommend a visit to what may look like a factory, but is in fact an experiment in theatricalizing the process of strong spirit production – and not only that, but also of “pure art”, capable of evolving anywhere.

Object

The Arch and the Triangle

The new Stone Mnevniki business center by Kleinewelt Architekten – designed for the same client as their projects in Khodynka – bears certain similarities to those earlier developments, but not entirely. In Mnevniki, there are more angular elements, and the architects themselves describe the project as being built on contrast. Indeed, while the first phase contains subtle references to classical architecture – light touches like arches, both upright and inverted, evoking the spirit of the 1980s – the second phase draws more distantly on the modernism of the 1970s. What unites them is a boldly expressive public space design, a kaleidoscope of rays and triangles.

Object

Health Factory

While working on a wellness and tourist complex on the banks of the Yenisei River, the architects at Vissarionov Studio set out to create healing spaces that would amplify the benefits of nature and medical treatments for both body and soul. The spatial solutions are designed to encourage interaction between the guests and the landscape, as well as each other.

Object

The Blooming Mechanics of a Glass Forest

The Savvinskaya 27 apartment complex built by Level Group, currently nearing completion on an elongated riverfront site next to the Novodevichy Convent, boasts a form that’s daring even by modern Moscow standards. Visually, it resembles the collaborative creation of a glassblower and a sculptor: a kind of glass-and-concrete jungle, rhythmically structured yet growing energetically and vividly. Bringing such an idea to life was by no means an easy task. In this article, we discuss the concept by ODA and the methods used by APEX architects to implement it, along with a look at the building’s main units and detailing.

Object

Grace and Unity

Villa “Grace”, designed by Roman Leonidov’s studio and built in the Moscow suburbs, strikes a balance between elegant minimalism and the expansive gestures of the Russian soul. The main house is conceived as a sequence of four self-contained volumes – each could exist independently, yet it chooses to be part of a whole. Unity is achieved through color and a system of shared spaces, while the rich plasticity of the forms – refined throughout the construction process – compensates for the near-total absence of decorative elements.

Object

Daring Brilliance

In this article, we are exploring “New Vision”, the first school built in the past 25 years in Moscow’s Khamovniki. The building has three main features: it is designed in accordance with the universal principles of modern education, fostering learning through interaction and more; second, the façades combine structural molded glass and metallic glazed ceramics – expensive and technologically advanced materials. Third, this is the school of Garden Quarters, the latest addition to Moscow’s iconic Khamovniki district. Both a costly and, in its way, audacious acquisition, it carries a youthful boldness in its statement. Let’s explore how the school is designed and where the contrasts lie.

Object

A Twist of the Core

A clever and concise sculptural solution – rotating each floor by N degrees – has created an ensemble of “dancing” towers: similar yet different, simple yet complex. The designers meticulously refined a single structural node and spent considerable effort on the column construction – after that, “everything else was easy”. The architects also rotated the core walls on each floor to maximize the efficiency of the office spaces.

Object

The Sculpting of Spring Forest Matter

We’ve been observing this building for a couple of years now: seemingly simple, perhaps even unassuming, it fits in remarkably well with the micro-district context shaped by the Moscow MCD road junctions. This building sticks in the memory of everyone who drives along the highway, even occasionally. In our opinion, Sergey Nikeshkin, by blending popular architectural techniques and approaches of the 2010s, managed to turn a seemingly simple structure into a statement “on the theme of a house as such”. Let’s figure out how this happened.

Object

Water and Wind Whet the Stone

The Arisha Terraces residential complex, designed by Asadov Architects, will be built in a district of Dubai dedicated to film and television production. To create shaded spaces and an intriguing silhouette, the architects opted for a funnel-shaped composition and nature-inspired forms of erosion and weathering. The roofs, podium, and underground spaces extend leisure opportunities within the boundaries of a man-made “oasis”.

Object

Elevation 5642

The Genplan Institute of Moscow has developed a comprehensive development project for three ski resorts in the Caucasus, which have been designated as special economic zones of the tourism and recreation type. The first of these zones is Elbrus. The project includes the construction of new ski runs, cable cars, and hotels, as well as the modernization of stations and improvements to the Azau tourist meadow. To expand the audience and enhance year-round appeal, a network of eco-trails is also being developed. In this article, we provide a detailed breakdown of each stage.

Object

The IT Town

Taking the example of the first completed phase of the “U” district, we examine how the new neighborhood in Innopolis will be organized. T+T Architects and HADAA formed a well-balanced and ingenious master plan with different types of housing, a green artery, a system of squares, and a park in the town’s central part.

Object

The Heart Lies Within

The second-phase building of the Evgeny Primakov School already won multiple awards while still in the design stage. Now that it’s completed, some unfinished nuances remain – most notably, the exposed ceiling structures, which ideally should have been concealed. However, given the priority placed on the building’s volumetric composition, this does not seem critical. What matters more is the “Wow!” effect created by the space itself.

Object

Magnetic Forces

“Krylatskaya 33” is the first large-scale residential complex to appear amidst the 1980s “micro-districts” that harmoniously coexist with the forests, the river, the slopes, and the sports infrastructure. Despite its imposing scale, the architects of Ostozhenka managed to turn the complex into something that can be best described as a “graceful dominant”. First, they designed the complex with consideration for the style and height of the surrounding micro-districts. Second, by introducing a pause in its tallest section, they created compositional tension – right along the urban planning axis of the area.

Object

Orion’s Belt

The Stone Khodynka 2 office complex, designed by Kleinewelt Architekten for the company Stone, is built with an ergonomic layout following “healthy building” principles: natural light, ventilation, and all the necessary features for an efficient office environment. On the outside, it resembles – like many contemporary buildings – an iPhone: sleek, glowing, glass-and-metal, edges elegantly rounded. Yet, it responds sensitively to the Khodynka context, where the main theme is the contrast between vertical and horizontal lines. The key intrigue lies in the design of the “stylobate” as a suspended passage, leaving the space beneath it open for free pedestrian movement.

Interview

Grigory Revzin: “It Was a Bold Statement Made on the Sly. Something Won”

In this article, we discuss the debates surrounding the circus competition and the demolition of the CMEA building with the most renowned architectural critic of our time. A paradox emerges in the process: while nostalgia for the Brezhnev era seems to be in vogue in Russia, a landmark building – the “axis” of the Warsaw Pact – has been sentenced to demolition. Isn’t that strange? We also find out that wow-architecture has made a comeback as a post-COVID trend. However, to make a truly powerful statement, professionals still remain indispensable.

Object

Exposed Concrete

One of the stages of improving a small square in the town of Lermontov was the construction of a skatepark. Entrusting this part of the project to the XSA team, the city gained a 250-meter trick track whose features resemble those of land art objects – unparalleled in Russia in both scale and design. Here’s a look at how the experimental snake run in the foothills of the Caucasus was built.

Object

One Step Closer To the Dream

The challenges of getting all the mandatory approvals, an insufficient budget, and construction site difficulties did not prevent ASADOV Bureau from achieving its main goal in the realization of the school project in the town of Troitsk – taking another step away from outdated notions of educational spaces toward creating a fundamentally new academic environment.

Object

Chalet on the Rock

An Accor hotel in Arkhyz, designed by A.Len, will be situated at the gateway to the resort’s main tourist hubs. The architects reinterpreted the widely popular chalet style while adding an unexpected twist – an unfinished structure preserved on the site. The design team transformed this remnant into an exciting space featuring an open-air pool and a restaurant with panoramic views of the region’s highest mountain ridges.

Interview

Sergey Skuratov: “By and large, the project has been realized in line with the original ideas”

In this issue, we talk to the chief architect of Garden Quarters, looking back at the history and key moments of a project that took 18 years to develop and has now finally been completed. What interests us most are the transformations that the project underwent during construction, and the way the “necessary void” of public space was formed, which turned this remarkable complex into a fragment of a whole new type of urban fabric – not just at the horizontal “street” level but in its vertical structure as well.

Object

A Unique Representative

The recently concluded year 2024 can be considered the year of completion for the “Garden Quarters” residential complex in Moscow’s Khamovniki. This project is well-known and, in many ways, iconic. Rarely does one manage to preserve such a number of original ideas, achieving in the end a kind of urban planning Gesamtkunstwerk. Here is a subjective view from an architecture journalist, with an interview with Sergey Skuratov soon to follow.

Object

Field of Life

The new project by the architectural company PNKB (an acronym for “Design, Research, and Advisory Bureau”), led by Sergey Gnedovsky and Anton Lyubimkin, for the Kulikovo Field Museum is dedicated to the field as a concept in its own right. The field has long been a focus of the museum’s thorough and successful research. Accordingly, the exterior of the new museum building is gentler than that of its predecessor, which was also designed by PNKB and dedicated specifically to the historic battle. Inside, however, the building confidently guides the visitor from a luminous atrium along a spiral path to the field – interpreted here as a field of life.

Object

A Paper Clip above the River

In this article, we talk with Vitaly Lutz from the Genplan Institute of Moscow about the design and unique features of the pedestrian bridge that now links the two banks of the Yauza River in the new cluster of Bauman Moscow State Technical University (MSTU). The bridge’s form and functionality – particularly the inclusion of an amphitheater suspended over the river – were conceived during the planning phase of the territory’s development. Typically, this approach is not standard practice, but the architects advocate for it, referring to this intermediate project phase as the “pre-AGR” stage (AGR stands for Architectural and Urban Planning Approval). Such a practice, they argue, helps define key parameters of future projects and bridge the gap between urban planning and architectural design.

Review

Living in the Architecture of One’s Own Making

Do architects design houses for themselves? You bet! In this article, we are examining a new book by TATLIN publishing house. This book – unprecedented for Russia – features 52 private homes designed and built by contemporary architects for themselves. It includes houses that are famous, even iconic, as well as lesser-known ones; large and small, stylish and eccentric. To some extent, the book reflects the history of Russian architecture over the past 30 years.

Object

A City Block Isoline

Another competition project for a residential complex on the banks of the Volga in Nizhny Novgorod has been prepared by Studio 44. A team of architects led by Ivan Kozhin concluded that using a regular block layout in such a location would be inappropriate and developed a “custom design” approach: a chain of parceled multi-section buildings stretching along the entire embankment. Let’s explore the features and advantages of this unconventional method.

Report

Competition: The Price of Creativity?

Any day now, we’re expecting the results of a competition held by the “Samolet” development group for a plot in Kommunarka. In the meantime, we share the impressions of Editor-in-Chief Julia Tarabarina, who managed to conduct a public talk. Though technically focused on the interaction between developers and architects, the public talk turned into a discussion about the pros and cons of architectural competitions.

Object

Terraced Design

The “River Park” residential complex has confidently and securely shaped the Nagatinsky Backwater shoreline. Featuring a public embankment, elevated courtyards connected by pedestrian bridges, and brick façades, the development invites exploration of its nuanced response to the surrounding context, as well as hints of the architects’ megalithic design thinking.

A Kremlin’s Core and Meteorite Fragments

We continue our coverage of the competition projects for the residential district that the development company GloraX plans to build along the embankment of the Rowing Channel in Nizhny Novgorod. ASADOV Architects approached the concept through a deep dive into local identity, using storytelling to pinpoint a central idea for the design: the master plan and composition are imagined as if a meteorite had struck a “proto-Kremlin”. Sounds weird? Find more details below!