По-русски

Under the Canopy of Pope of Rome

Mezonproekt has built a new studio for the renowned sculptor Zurab Tsereteli inside the yard of the house on the Pyatnitskaya Street, across from the Church of Clement, Pope of Rome. Soft eco-modernism met some Art Deco features.

02 December 2019
Object
mainImg
This typology is very rare for the center of Moscow. The low-key three-story building of the artistic studio (total area about 300 square meters, height 12 meters) stands in the yard of the former city estate on the Pyatnitskaya Street. The client owns a small land plot underneath the building, while the yard itself is municipal. The building of the studio pops up in the clearing between the buildings from the side of the Klementyevsky Alley as a dramatic stained glass window three stories high. The influence of the large church of some “Saint-Petersburg” nature, designed, according to some sources, by the mighty Tresini himself, is also obvious here. The presence of Pope in Moscow’s toponymy comes quite as a surprise and causes strange feelings, as if symptomatically reminding us of the controversial character of the pillars of this world. I am not sure if Zurab Konstantinovich Tsereteli can be considered to be the Pope of Moscow’s sculpture making, but then again, why not? The studio, in spite of its small size, looks like a treasure chest, an expensive toy that is strikingly different from everything else in its style, color, and plastique. The walls are coated with a composite material that imitates walnut, the metallic frames of the stained glass windows painted bronze color.

The studio of Zurab Tsereteli
Copyright: Photograph: Archi.ru, 2019


In the stead of the current land plot, there used to be a wooden annex of an unassuming building; when the architects started working on the project, its foundation was everything that was left of it. However, the very theme of wood became for the architects of Mezonproekt the starting point in the search of the image. They eventually settled on the soft modernist version that presents a delicate contrast to the surrounding architectural context.

The studio of Zurab Tsereteli
Copyright: Photograph: Archi.ru, 2019


As for the personality of Zurab Tsereteli, considering his creative work, one could expect a more conservative image and style of his own studio. In this particular case, however, according to the partner of Mezonproekt, Ilia Mashkov, an agreement was reached about nonintervention in the architects’ affairs. The client did not influence the choice of the style and light-heartedly approved the visible appearance of the building. The construction, however, took five long years for various reasons.

On the plan, the mansion looks like the letter “L”, its volume essentially consisting of two parallelepipeds, large and small. One of them hosts the double-height architectural studio occupying the entire space of the second and third floors. The capacious hall is lit through the enormous stained glass, as well as through the skylight up above. The first floor underneath it hosts a master class hall for 25 people (since the master of the house is the President of the Russian Academy of Fine Arts, the function of this building is not only creative work but education as well). The rest of the building contains a lobby, an elevator, a staircase, and restrooms. The smaller parallelepiped is also occupied by the emergency staircase.

The studio of Zurab Tsereteli
Copyright: Photograph: Archi.ru, 2019


The entire main facade is essentially a stained glass with a sash pattern that is ostentatiously volumetric. The main entrance is made in the corner part between the two volumes. This made it possible to vacate some space for the studio, and turn it towards the stained glass window. An extra entrance is situated to the right of the main facade underneath the marquee. In order to set off this element, the architects added a bay window protruding from the facade on the level of the second floor. The other volume with the emergency staircase also looks into the yard with a stained glass window.

The studio of Zurab Tsereteli
Copyright: Photograph: Archi.ru, 2019


An art studio hosted in an individual building is, of course, an unusual typology. Strange though it might be, Melnikov’s house in the Krivoarbatsky Alley comes to mind. Both buildings are situated in the yard, both present a prominent contrast with the surrounding buildings, both consist of two vertical volumes glued to one another, both sport a stained glass window on the front part, the second and third floors occupied by a studio – these two buildings have a lot in common, even though the architects did not mean anything of the kind. Generally speaking, it often happens that an architect’s (an artist’s) house looks nothing like his work: Melnikov’s house does not look like the rest of Melnikov’s creative work, Shekhtel’s house on the Sadovaya does not look like the rest of Shekhtel’s work, and, following suit, Zurab Tsereteli’s studio looks nothing like Zurab Tsereteli. And all of these buildings are like small treasure chests with a secret, contrastive to their surroundings. Probably, the main thing that is different about this local typology is large windows and double-height spaces.

The studio of Zurab Tsereteli
Copyright: Photograph: Archi.ru, 2019


The three-story stained glass window of Tsereteli’s studio with a prominent vertical pattern looks like the deck of a musical instrument or a church organ, the wooden decoration of the walls adding to the likeness. The stained glass window represents some floor-based structure with different frequency of conditional “windows”, and even a hint at some generalized cornice – an Art Deco feature, which, however, is crossed here with wooden modernism. The windows of the side facades are distributed over the wall surface in an asymmetric way, some of them reaching the corners, which is definitely a sign of avant-garde architecture, even though these corners are on the inner sides.

  • zooming
    1 / 3
    The studio of Zurab Tsereteli
    Copyright: © Mezonproekt
  • zooming
    2 / 3
    The studio of Zurab Tsereteli
    Copyright: Photograph: Archi.ru, 2019
  • zooming
    3 / 3
    Photograph: Archi.ru, 2019
    Copyright: Photograph: Archi.ru, 2019


The decoration panels that imitate wood, dark and light-colored, could have been simply wooden, because the construction rules and regulations do allow low-rise wooden buildings. In the center of the city, however, these are still few and far between, or, rather, their usage is limited to temporary park pavilions and art clusters. Wooden architecture in the city is a branch that is very promising from the environmental standpoint, and it will be sure to develop. But then again, you cannot but recognize that the wood imitating panels are easier to maintain, and they are sturdier, all this considering the fact that they do look like the real thing.
  • zooming
    1 / 14
    The studio of Zurab Tsereteli
    Copyright: Photograph: Archi.ru, 2019
  • zooming
    2 / 14
    The studio of Zurab Tsereteli
    Copyright: Photograph: Archi.ru, 2019
  • zooming
    3 / 14
    The studio of Zurab Tsereteli. Development drawing alog the Pyatnitskaya Street. Project, 2014
    Copyright: © Mezonproekt
  • zooming
    4 / 14
    The studio of Zurab Tsereteli. Development drawing alog the Klimentovsky Alley. Project, 2014
    Copyright: © Mezonproekt
  • zooming
    5 / 14
    The studio of Zurab Tsereteli. Project, 2014 @ Mezonproekt
    Copyright: © Mezonproekt
  • zooming
    6 / 14
    The studio of Zurab Tsereteli. Location plan
    Copyright: © Mezonproekt
  • zooming
    7 / 14
    The studio of Zurab Tsereteli. Project, 2014
    Copyright: © Mezonproekt
  • zooming
    8 / 14
    The studio of Zurab Tsereteli. Plan of the -1st floor. Project, 2014
    Copyright: © Mezonproekt
  • zooming
    9 / 14
    The studio of Zurab Tsereteli. Plan of the 1st floor
    Copyright: © Mezonproekt
  • zooming
    10 / 14
    The studio of Zurab Tsereteli. Plan of the -1st floor
    Copyright: © Mezonproekt
  • zooming
    11 / 14
    The studio of Zurab Tsereteli. Plan of the 2nd floor
    Copyright: © Mezonproekt
  • zooming
    12 / 14
    The studio of Zurab Tsereteli. Plan of the roof
    Copyright: © Mezonproekt
  • zooming
    13 / 14
    The studio of Zurab Tsereteli. Section 1-1
    Copyright: © Mezonproekt
  • zooming
    14 / 14
    The studio of Zurab Tsereteli. Section 2-2
    Copyright: © Mezonproekt


02 December 2019

Headlines now
Magnetic Forces
“Krylatskaya 33” is the first large-scale residential complex to appear amidst the 1980s “micro-districts” that harmoniously coexist with the forests, the river, the slopes, and the sports infrastructure. Despite its imposing scale, the architects of Ostozhenka managed to turn the complex into something that can be best described as a “graceful dominant”. First, they designed the complex with consideration for the style and height of the surrounding micro-districts. Second, by introducing a pause in its tallest section, they created compositional tension – right along the urban planning axis of the area.
Orion’s Belt
The Stone Khodynka 2 office complex, designed by Kleinewelt Architekten for the company Stone, is built with an ergonomic layout following “healthy building” principles: natural light, ventilation, and all the necessary features for an efficient office environment. On the outside, it resembles – like many contemporary buildings – an iPhone: sleek, glowing, glass-and-metal, edges elegantly rounded. Yet, it responds sensitively to the Khodynka context, where the main theme is the contrast between vertical and horizontal lines. The key intrigue lies in the design of the “stylobate” as a suspended passage, leaving the space beneath it open for free pedestrian movement.
Grigory Revzin: “It Was a Bold Statement Made on the Sly. Something Won”
In this article, we discuss the debates surrounding the circus competition and the demolition of the CMEA building with the most renowned architectural critic of our time. A paradox emerges in the process: while nostalgia for the Brezhnev era seems to be in vogue in Russia, a landmark building – the “axis” of the Warsaw Pact – has been sentenced to demolition. Isn’t that strange? We also find out that wow-architecture has made a comeback as a post-COVID trend. However, to make a truly powerful statement, professionals still remain indispensable.
Exposed Concrete
One of the stages of improving a small square in the town of Lermontov was the construction of a skatepark. Entrusting this part of the project to the XSA team, the city gained a 250-meter trick track whose features resemble those of land art objects – unparalleled in Russia in both scale and design. Here’s a look at how the experimental snake run in the foothills of the Caucasus was built.
One Step Closer To the Dream
The challenges of getting all the mandatory approvals, an insufficient budget, and construction site difficulties did not prevent ASADOV Bureau from achieving its main goal in the realization of the school project in the town of Troitsk – taking another step away from outdated notions of educational spaces toward creating a fundamentally new academic environment.
Chalet on the Rock
An Accor hotel in Arkhyz, designed by A.Len, will be situated at the gateway to the resort’s main tourist hubs. The architects reinterpreted the widely popular chalet style while adding an unexpected twist – an unfinished structure preserved on the site. The design team transformed this remnant into an exciting space featuring an open-air pool and a restaurant with panoramic views of the region’s highest mountain ridges.
Sergey Skuratov: “By and large, the project has been realized in line with the original ideas”
In this issue, we talk to the chief architect of Garden Quarters, looking back at the history and key moments of a project that took 18 years to develop and has now finally been completed. What interests us most are the transformations that the project underwent during construction, and the way the “necessary void” of public space was formed, which turned this remarkable complex into a fragment of a whole new type of urban fabric – not just at the horizontal “street” level but in its vertical structure as well.
A Unique Representative
The recently concluded year 2024 can be considered the year of completion for the “Garden Quarters” residential complex in Moscow’s Khamovniki. This project is well-known and, in many ways, iconic. Rarely does one manage to preserve such a number of original ideas, achieving in the end a kind of urban planning Gesamtkunstwerk. Here is a subjective view from an architecture journalist, with an interview with Sergey Skuratov soon to follow.
Field of Life
The new project by the architectural company PNKB (an acronym for “Design, Research, and Advisory Bureau”), led by Sergey Gnedovsky and Anton Lyubimkin, for the Kulikovo Field Museum is dedicated to the field as a concept in its own right. The field has long been a focus of the museum’s thorough and successful research. Accordingly, the exterior of the new museum building is gentler than that of its predecessor, which was also designed by PNKB and dedicated specifically to the historic battle. Inside, however, the building confidently guides the visitor from a luminous atrium along a spiral path to the field – interpreted here as a field of life.
A Paper Clip above the River
In this article, we talk with Vitaly Lutz from the Genplan Institute of Moscow about the design and unique features of the pedestrian bridge that now links the two banks of the Yauza River in the new cluster of Bauman Moscow State Technical University (MSTU). The bridge’s form and functionality – particularly the inclusion of an amphitheater suspended over the river – were conceived during the planning phase of the territory’s development. Typically, this approach is not standard practice, but the architects advocate for it, referring to this intermediate project phase as the “pre-AGR” stage (AGR stands for Architectural and Urban Planning Approval). Such a practice, they argue, helps define key parameters of future projects and bridge the gap between urban planning and architectural design.
Living in the Architecture of One’s Own Making
Do architects design houses for themselves? You bet! In this article, we are examining a new book by TATLIN publishing house. This book – unprecedented for Russia – features 52 private homes designed and built by contemporary architects for themselves. It includes houses that are famous, even iconic, as well as lesser-known ones; large and small, stylish and eccentric. To some extent, the book reflects the history of Russian architecture over the past 30 years.
A City Block Isoline
Another competition project for a residential complex on the banks of the Volga in Nizhny Novgorod has been prepared by Studio 44. A team of architects led by Ivan Kozhin concluded that using a regular block layout in such a location would be inappropriate and developed a “custom design” approach: a chain of parceled multi-section buildings stretching along the entire embankment. Let’s explore the features and advantages of this unconventional method.
Competition: The Price of Creativity?
Any day now, we’re expecting the results of a competition held by the “Samolet” development group for a plot in Kommunarka. In the meantime, we share the impressions of Editor-in-Chief Julia Tarabarina, who managed to conduct a public talk. Though technically focused on the interaction between developers and architects, the public talk turned into a discussion about the pros and cons of architectural competitions.
Terraced Design
The “River Park” residential complex has confidently and securely shaped the Nagatinsky Backwater shoreline. Featuring a public embankment, elevated courtyards connected by pedestrian bridges, and brick façades, the development invites exploration of its nuanced response to the surrounding context, as well as hints of the architects’ megalithic design thinking.
A Kremlin’s Core and Meteorite Fragments
We continue our coverage of the competition projects for the residential district that the development company GloraX plans to build along the embankment of the Rowing Channel in Nizhny Novgorod. ASADOV Architects approached the concept through a deep dive into local identity, using storytelling to pinpoint a central idea for the design: the master plan and composition are imagined as if a meteorite had struck a “proto-Kremlin”. Sounds weird? Find more details below!
The Volga Regatta
GloraX plans to develop a residential complex spanning 14 hectares along the Volga River in Nizhny Novgorod. The winning design in a closed-door competition, created by GORA Architects, features housing typologies ranging from townhouses to terraced high-rise slabs, a balance of functions, diverse ways of engaging with the water, and even a dedicated island (no less!) for the city residents.
Life Plans
The master plan for the residential district “Prityazheniye” (“Gravity”) in Naberezhnye Chelny was developed by the architectural company A.Len, taking into account the specific urban planning context and partially implemented solutions of the first phase. However, the master plan prioritized its own values: a green framework, a system of focal points, a hierarchy of spaces, and pedestrian priority. After this, the question of what residents will do in their neighborhood simply doesn’t arise.
A New Track
We took a thorough look at D_Station, a railcar repair depot dating back to 1906, recently reconstructed while preserving its century-old industrial structure, upon the project by Sergey Trukhanov and T+T Architects. Though work on the interiors – set to house restaurants and public spaces – is still underway, the building’s exterior already offers plenty to see. Visitors can explore the blend of old and new brickwork, appreciate the architect’s unique interpretation of ruin aesthetics, and enjoy the newly built pedestrian route that connects the Citydel Business Center’s arches to Kazakova Street.
Four Different Surveys
The “Explore the City” competition, organized this year by the Genplan Institute of Moscow, stands out as a pretty unconventional one for the architectural field but aligns perfectly well with the character of urban planning work. The winning project analyzed contemporary residential complexes, combining urban planning insights with a realtor’s perspective to propose a hybrid approach. Other entries explored public centers, motivations for car ownership, and housing vacancy rates. A fifth participant withdrew. Here’s a closer look at the four completed works.
Scheduled Evolution
ASADOV Architects unveiled the EvyCenter pavilion, a microcultural hub for fostering personal growth, organizing workshops, and doing gymnastics. Additionally, this pavilion serves as a prototype for a scalable country house, drawing inspiration from the “Loskutok” project, and constructed from CLT panels in a factory. This marks the beginning of a developer project initiated by the architectural firm (sic!), which is seeking partners to expand both small Evy settlements and even larger Evy cities, which are, according to Andrey Asadov, aimed at fostering the “evolutionary” development of the people who will inhabit them.
The Golden Crown
The concept for a dental clinic in Yekaterinburg, developed by CNTR Studio, revolves around the idea of a “mouth full of gold”: pristine white porcelain stoneware walls are complemented by matte brass details. To avoid an overly literal interpretation, the architects focused on the building’s proportions, skillfully navigating between sunlight requirements and fire safety regulations.
Flexibility and Integration
Not long ago, we covered the project for the fourth phase of the ÁLIA residential complex, designed by APEX. Now, we’ve been shown different fence concepts they developed to enclose the complex’s private courtyards, incorporating a variety of public functions. We believe that the sheer fact that the complex’s architects were involved in such a detail as fencing speaks volumes.
A Step Forward
The HIDE residential complex represents a major milestone for ADM architects and their leaders Andrey Romanov and Ekaterina Kuznetsova in their quest for a fresh high-rise aesthetic – one that is flexible and layered, capable of bringing vibrancy to mass and silhouette while shaping form. Over recent years, this approach has become ADM’s “signature style”, with the golden HIDE tower playing a pivotal role in its evolution. Here, we delve into the project’s story, explore the details of the complex’s design, and uncover its core essence.
Gold in the Sands
A new office for a transcontinental company specializing in resource extraction and processing has opened in Dubai. Designed by T+T Architects, masters of creating spaces that are contemporary, diverse, flexible, and original, this project exemplifies their expertise. On the executive floor, a massive brass-clad partition dominates, while layered textures of compressed earth create a contextually resonant backdrop.
Layers and Levels of Flight
This project goes way back – Reserve Union won this architectural competition at the end of 2011, and the building was completed in 2018, so it’s practically “archival”. However, despite being relatively unknown, the building can hardly be considered “dated” and remains a prime example of architectural expression, particularly in the headquarters genre. And it’s especially fitting for an aviation company office. In some ways, it resembles the Aeroflot headquarters at Sheremetyevo but with its own unique identity, following the signature style of Vladimir Plotkin. In this article, we take an in-depth look at the United Aircraft Corporation (UAC) headquarters in the Moscow agglomeration town of Zhukovsky, supplemented by recent photographs from Alexey Naroditsky – a shoot that became only recently possible due to the fact that improvements were finally made in the surrounding area.
Light and Shadow
In this article, we delve into the architectural design of the “Chaika” house by DNK ag architects, which was recently completed in 2023 as part of the collection of signature designs at ZILArt. As is well-known, all the buildings in this complex follow a design code, yet each one is distinct. This particular building stands out not only for its whiteness and minimalism but also for the refined use of a limited number of techniques that, together, create what can confidently be called synergy.
Casus Novae
A master plan was developed for a large residential area with a name of “DNS City”, but now that its implementation began, the plan has been arbitrarily reformatted and replaced with something that, while similar on the surface, is actually quite different. This is not the first time such a thing happens, but it’s always frustrating. With permission from the author, we are sharing Maria Elkina’s post.
Treasure Hunting
The GAFA bureau, in collaboration with Tegola and Arkhitail, organized an expedition to the island of Kilpola in Karelia as part of Moskomarkhitektura’s “Open City” festival. There, amidst moss and rocks, the students sought answers to questions like: what is the sacred, where does it dwell, and what sustains it? Assisting the participants in this quest were landscape engineer Evgeny Levin, artist Nicholas Roerich, a moose, and the lack of cellular connection. Here’s how the story unfolded.
Depths of the Earth, Streams of Water
In the Malaya Okhta district, the Akzent building, designed by Stepan Liphart, was constructed. It follows a classic tripartite structure, yet it’s what you might call “hand-drawn”: each façade is unique in its form and details, some of which aren’t immediately noticeable. In this article, we explore the context and, together with the architect, delve into how the form was developed.
Fir Tree Dynamics
The “Airports of Region” holding is planning to build an airport in Karachay-Cherkessia, aiming to make the Arkhyz and Dombay resorts more accessible to travelers. The project that won in an invitation-only competition, submitted by Sergey Nikeshkin’s KPLN, blends natural imagery inspired by the shape of a conifer seed, open-air waiting spaces, majestic large trees, and a green roof elevated on needle-like columns. The result is both nature-inspired and WOW.