По-русски

Key to the Island

Sergey Skuratov's project for the Sofiyskaya Embankment gracefully ties the Roman associations and the beauty of inner controversies of today's architecture to the context of today's Moscow. The result is a new city axis where the view of the Kremlin tower must draw the tourist into a perspective and then lead him down the boulevard to the river.

29 October 2015
Object
mainImg


This project by Sergey Skuratov won the international competition for the best concept of integrated multifunctional construction on the Sofiyskaya Embankment getting the upper hand of five other finalists: Steven Holl, Benedetta Taglabue of EMBT, Sergey Tchoban, Cino Zucchi, and MLA+ (Markus Appenzeller and others). The projects of the five finalists are available here.

"This is a very mysterious place and one that imposes great responsibility on you - said the architect on the day the results of the contest were announced - I must have walked around it for decades, and I even made attempts to make my first test proposals. In my opinion, transforming this place will be the key to finding a solution for the entire island". 

Multifunctional integrated development of the Sofiyskaya Embankment. Location plan © Sergey Skuratov ARCHITECTS


Multifunctional integrated development of the Sofiyskaya Embankment. View from a roof © Sergey Skuratov ARCHITECTS


Thus, the contestants were required to create a project of a multifunctional complex consisting of a residential part, a boutique hotel, shops, cafes, a parking lot, and a fitness center, as well as pay homage to the hot trend of today taking care of the urban environment. The proposals by all the six finalists addressed this part of the task by designing a boulevard that connected the Bolotnaya Square to the embankment running along the Moskva River framing, one way or another, the view of Moscow's main sight - the towers of the Kremlin. 

Sergey Skuratov, however, going far beyond the pale of the land site in question, made a perfect match between the public space of the boulevard and the visual pedestrian axis connecting the beginning of the Lavrushinsky Alley to the embankment. This axis will lead an individual who, say, exited from the Tretyakovskaya Gallery and saw in the unfolding perspective the landmark of the Vodovzvodnaya Tower, down the park to the boulevard - where they will immerse themselves into the atmosphere of a bustling tourist city - and then will find themselves on the embankment to enjoy the views of the Tsar's fortress. In order to make this path more smooth, and in order to make the tower always visible in the distance, every detail has been taken care of: the architect draws pedestrian crossings and proposes to prolong and broaden the traverse promenade of the park, and maybe even - still later on - take away the large circular flower bed behind the back of the bronze Repin monument, so that it would not get in the way. Also it is planned that a few hazardous trees will be removed from the line of vision. Ultimately the city is going to get a small but still new and neat tourist route running from the museum passage at the corner of the future new building of the Tretyakovskaya Gallery to the moor on the embankment. For the time being, there is also a hypothetical possibility of getting a reverse tourist route: if the tourists come by boat and make an ascent to the nation's main museum of painting via a small pedestrian street inside the new complex designed by Skuratov. 

Multifunctional integrated development of the Sofiyskaya Embankment. Axis. Master plan © Sergey Skuratov ARCHITECTS


Multifunctional integrated development of the Sofiyskaya Embankment © Sergey Skuratov ARCHITECTS


Multifunctional integrated development of the Sofiyskaya Embankment. Pedestrian crossing © Sergey Skuratov ARCHITECTS


Multifunctional integrated development of the Sofiyskaya Embankment. Replanting the trees © Sergey Skuratov ARCHITECTS


Multifunctional integrated development of the Sofiyskaya Embankment. Boulevard © Sergey Skuratov ARCHITECTS


Multifunctional integrated development of the Sofiyskaya Embankment. The central pedestrian area © Sergey Skuratov ARCHITECTS


Multifunctional integrated development of the Sofiyskaya Embankment. The central pedestrian artery © Sergey Skuratov ARCHITECTS


The beam that connects the museum and the tower was prompted by the cityscape itself; meanwhile, it is not the only "starting point" in the project: the architect also carefully "reads out" other peculiar features of the space that he creates out of the territory's details. The almost imperceptible broadening of the borders of the land site in the direction of the river is transferred over to the contours of the pedestrian boulevard through the volumes of residential buildings standing parallel to these borders, one standing parallel to the western, and the other - to the eastern one. Joining at an angle, the walls endow the pedestrian street with a play of perspective, akin to Michelangelo's Stairs in Vatican. It narrows as it approaches the Bolotnaya Square and widens as it gets closer to the Kremlin, forming a wide frame and thus bringing Moscow's main sight even a little closer to the viewer. 

Multifunctional integrated development of the Sofiyskaya Embankment © Sergey Skuratov ARCHITECTS


Multifunctional integrated development of the Sofiyskaya Embankment © Sergey Skuratov ARCHITECTS


Multifunctional integrated development of the Sofiyskaya Embankment. Bird's height view © Sergey Skuratov ARCHITECTS


Then the architect takes the space which is the result or even a sum total that he derives from the peculiarities of its surroundings and adds some extra faceting to it: specifically, he smoothly cuts off the corner of the eastern building along the line of that same "beam" of vision.

The described theme of merging of the axes graphically manifests itself in the pattern of the pavement that consists of a multitude of strokes perpendicular to these two main axes; when crossing, they form a semblance of a geometric centipede with "beam" legs, the whole thing ultimately looking like a mini-quest for a person standing there and looking down, some sort of code concealing one of the main meanings of this place - the "backbone" of its territory.

Multifunctional integrated development of the Sofiyskaya Embankment. Paving plan © Sergey Skuratov ARCHITECTS


Multifunctional integrated development of the Sofiyskaya Embankment. Paving plan © Sergey Skuratov ARCHITECTS


Multifunctional integrated development of the Sofiyskaya Embankment. Landscaping plan © Sergey Skuratov ARCHITECTS


Multifunctional integrated development of the Sofiyskaya Embankment. Pedestrian and transport plan © Sergey Skuratov ARCHITECTS


On the whole, Sergey Skuratov ultimately got a very "Moscow" boulevard: the fact that it is tied to the local terrain by a few parameters predictably gave a collection of jagged contours and differently pointed angles with comparatively narrow gates for entering and exiting. Apart from that, a certain difficulty for opening up the boulevard's perspective was posed by the manor house wing and its annex that stood directly on the beam's line - being in fact a low-rise two-story affair, it did not block the entire view, of course, but still was enough to ruin the classical "prism" structure. Exiting from the embankment side is only possible at an angle, through the former courtyard of the Durasov Manor House (that will be remodeled to become a hotel this time), then flanking the wing from the right. The whole thing is anything but a classic avenue - rather, it is a string of Venetian-type squares with deep corners filled by the cozy cafe tables, but at the same time it remains to be a string of classic Moscow yards. 

Multifunctional integrated development of the Sofiyskaya Embankment. Bird's height view © Sergey Skuratov ARCHITECTS


Multifunctional integrated development of the Sofiyskaya Embankment. Bird's height view © Sergey Skuratov ARCHITECTS


Multifunctional integrated development of the Sofiyskaya Embankment. View from the roof © Sergey Skuratov ARCHITECTS


What is important is the fact that this space is actually the realization of the ultimate dream of Gutnov's school of thought. The echo of the projects of the seventies and eighties that presented this city as being well cared for and looked after, lending itself for pedestrian walks, a bit reminiscent of the coziness of the centers of European cities, and a bit trying to restore the charm of the "village" Moscow, that was right about that time sliced by the scissors of the newly built residential slabs. Here, the center of a European town comes to mind again, which is no surprise, because it is precisely the place that the examples of high quality land organization are to be found at. However, there's still a flavor of a "good old Moscow little yard" in the air. One can even remember that the painting by Polenov is kept nearby, in that same State Tretyakovskaya Gallery to which the southern end of the territorial beam is pointed.

Along the sides of the boulevard, there are shop windows - there is a reason for Sergey Skuratov comparing the space that he invented to Saint-Louis en l'Île, the Parisian island to the Moscow one. And beneath the strolling people's feet, the architect places the atrium of an underground shopping mall lit by the flat circular lamps built into the pavement (some critics of the projects confused (or pretended to confuse) them with puddles drawn on the 3D render to make it look more realistic, but, no, there are lamps, not puddles). The largest of such "downward windows" is a circular sun tube opening in the broad place of the square behind the manor's wing: in the atrium below it, there is a fountain, and this sun tube provides some extra light and fresh air to the underground floor, at the same time connecting the tiers vertically. The pedestrian shopping street, belonging half to the city, half to the underground, leads down to the embankment where, following the idea of reorganizing the Moskva River, in its smooth bend, a stone amphitheater with large-sized steps and a walking trail running along the waterfront is formed - some sort of "tourist climax" that completes the development of the town-planning, environmental, and other intrigues of the central part of the project. 

Multifunctional integrated development of the Sofiyskaya Embankment. Bird's height view © Sergey Skuratov ARCHITECTS


Multifunctional integrated development of the Sofiyskaya Embankment. View from the roof © Sergey Skuratov ARCHITECTS


There are also three private residential yards. Here, besides the landscaping, just as detailed as it is on the boulevard, there is yet another peculiarity: in front of the first-floor flats, personal terraces for the residents are organized, sunken into the ground. The "minus two" floor conceals the residents-only parking garage accessible by a special pass, while the "minus one" floor provides a public garage for the general public, first of all, for the shoppers. Also, in the western part, there is a high-ceilinged fitness center.

It is remarkable how modern architecture gets one speaking first about the spaces between the buildings, and then only about the buildings themselves. Nevertheless, they are also important. The three long units stand along the perimeter of the land site in a "double L", the fourth one snuggling in the middle, the pedestrian boulevard stretching east, and the residents-only yard lying west of it. From the architect's storyboard, one can easily see that back in the XVIII century this land had fewer houses standing upon it; mostly they stood alongside the embankment, and at the back of the site there were the remnants of the Tsar's gardens. In the XIX century, however, this whole territory was overbuilt with different houses, some of them being residential, some - factory buildings. The planning that is being proposed now is significantly denser - which comes as no surprise - but it still provides more air than the "capitalist" one. The narrow "wells" gave way to the yards of a human-friendly kind. 

Multifunctional integrated development of the Sofiyskaya Embankment. Stages of development and transformation of the planning infrastructure © Sergey Skuratov ARCHITECTS


Out of the six contestants, Sergey Skuratov was the only one to opt out of making his project in a more "conservative" or "contemporary" style - what he did was simply slice his volumes in half making one of the halves reservedly conservative and the other half - reservedly modern. Then, according to the architect, he "glued" them together with a layer of glass, thus avoiding the risk of any excessive thickness of the volumes: now each of the halves was no wider than 12 meters. So, this project is in effect a declaration of a mixture of more and less conservative architecture - a phenomenon to be seen in the centers of many historic cities such as Wien, Milan, or Istanbul.

Multifunctional integrated development of the Sofiyskaya Embankment. Hip build © Sergey Skuratov ARCHITECTS


Multifunctional integrated development of the Sofiyskaya Embankment © Sergey Skuratov ARCHITECTS


The "conservative" volumes are covered by beige Flemish brick whose proportions remind of plinthiform brick. The window jambs are ostentatiously deep, somewhere perpendicular to the surface of the wall, somewhere gently sloping, going into the perspective, and at some places the corner that turns to the window is circularly rounded, as if a column had "drowned" in it. Then these robust shafts line up to form an even clearer picture turning the window into a sculpture that might even be perceived as the embodiment of the author's meditation on the thickness, the volume, and the plastique of the wall. The architect names two prototypes for this form: the uprights of the Kremlin towers of the XVII century and the "textbook example" of the Roman Tomb of Eurysaces the Baker (MAKE ACTIVE WIKI), from which people usually remember the lines of round openings that the architects Shchuko and Gelfreich repeated in their project of Moscow's Lenin Library. And Sergey Skuratov also noted the close array of the wide round pillars of special proportions. At this point, it is time for us to remember that Moscow is in fact the Third Rome, and the columns turn out to be twice as contextual, mostly because of the antiquated traces of the Ancient Rome that is quite palpable here, just as through some of the intonations of the roman Art Deco supported by the unity of texture and the arrays of pylons on the top floors.

There is enough of "Moscow" here anyway, though: it is represented, among other things, by the gently sloping roof pitches, and the build hips upon the side walls, so much loved by the historic preservation activists - they appear in a few places forming the signs of the tell-tale "attic" silhouette and rhyming with the roofs of the preserved historic buildings nearby. But then again, at the side wall of the penthouse, one of the most expensive ones, commanding the view of the Vodovzvodnaya Tower, making a build hip was impossible: it would be really a bad idea to block such a great view. So, from this side, the side wall looks almost like a temple, framed by pairs of long columns.

Multifunctional integrated development of the Sofiyskaya Embankment © Sergey Skuratov ARCHITECTS


Multifunctional integrated development of the Sofiyskaya Embankment © Sergey Skuratov ARCHITECTS


Multifunctional integrated development of the Sofiyskaya Embankment © Sergey Skuratov ARCHITECTS


Multifunctional integrated development of the Sofiyskaya Embankment. Facade © Sergey Skuratov ARCHITECTS


Multifunctional integrated development of the Sofiyskaya Embankment. Facade © Sergey Skuratov ARCHITECTS


Multifunctional integrated development of the Sofiyskaya Embankment © Sergey Skuratov ARCHITECTS


Multifunctional integrated development of the Sofiyskaya Embankment © Sergey Skuratov ARCHITECTS


The "modernist" units, unlike the brick ones, are snow-white; it is planned that their facades will be covered with polished concrete. However, the facade that is turned to the boulevard - and we should hardly mention that the two walls of the boulevard are different, one being brick red, the other being white - is livened up by brick inserts that help to soften the contrast a little bit and bear a distant resemblance to brickwork showing through the stucco. The roofs of the white volumes will be flat, usable, and accessible to all the residents; the windows also have the smooth cutaways but at some places their glass stands out above the glass prism. Besides the common brick inserts, the resonance between the units is provided by the common proportions of the windows - the "French" floor-to-ceiling kind together with the "French" narrow balconies and the slabs of the windowsills. 

Wherever the side walls of the white volumes are turned to the Kremlin, they are "cut off" by the large steps of the terraces that Sergey Skuratov likens to an ancient theater inscribed into the city. The walls here are completely made of glass, the opaque glass turning into the mirror type in a smooth gradient. 

Multifunctional integrated development of the Sofiyskaya Embankment © Sergey Skuratov ARCHITECTS


Multifunctional integrated development of the Sofiyskaya Embankment © Sergey Skuratov ARCHITECTS


Multifunctional integrated development of the Sofiyskaya Embankment © Sergey Skuratov ARCHITECTS


It is obvious that the contrasting architecture of the merged slabs of the residential buildings will be convenient for the people who will live here, them having an opportunity to choose, among other things, which house they ultimately prefer - the snow-white one or the "ancient" red-brick kind. On the other hand, the alternation of the modern and the historical in a striped pattern has long since become the "visiting card" of Moscow architecture, so this artistic device also has certain signs of being contextual. 

As of now, it is still too early to judge how often strolling Muscovites or tourists will be "drawn in" by the "beam" that leads to this place from the Lavrushinsky Alley - presently, the Bolotnaya Square draws huge crowds that come here for anti-government rallies but that that does not happen every day; otherwise, the square is all but empty. It is hard to say which will be more convenient for the people who will live here - the busy public space with retail stores or the peaceful environment with views of the Kremlin. However, if we are to judge by some features of this project, as well as by Sergey Skuratov's words, this project could become a "seed" or even some sort of "gauge" for developing the city's downtown area. Or, in any case, help the Moscow island take on some useful features of the Paris one. 
***

The author's description of the project (Russian) and still more pictures are available here. 
Multifunctional integrated development of the Sofiyskaya Embankment © Sergey Skuratov ARCHITECTS
Multifunctional integrated development of the Sofiyskaya Embankment © Sergey Skuratov ARCHITECTS
Multifunctional integrated development of the Sofiyskaya Embankment. The interior of the penthouse © Sergey Skuratov ARCHITECTS
Multifunctional integrated development of the Sofiyskaya Embankment © Sergey Skuratov ARCHITECTS
Multifunctional integrated development of the Sofiyskaya Embankment © Sergey Skuratov ARCHITECTS
Multifunctional integrated development of the Sofiyskaya Embankment © Sergey Skuratov ARCHITECTS
Multifunctional integrated development of the Sofiyskaya Embankment. Master plan © Sergey Skuratov ARCHITECTS
Multifunctional integrated development of the Sofiyskaya Embankment © Sergey Skuratov ARCHITECTS
Multifunctional integrated development of the Sofiyskaya Embankment © Sergey Skuratov ARCHITECTS
Multifunctional integrated development of the Sofiyskaya Embankment © Sergey Skuratov ARCHITECTS
Multifunctional integrated development of the Sofiyskaya Embankment. Plan of the 2nd floor © Sergey Skuratov ARCHITECTS
Multifunctional integrated development of the Sofiyskaya Embankment. Plan of the 3rd floor © Sergey Skuratov ARCHITECTS
Multifunctional integrated development of the Sofiyskaya Embankment. Plan of the 4th floor © Sergey Skuratov ARCHITECTS
Multifunctional integrated development of the Sofiyskaya Embankment. Plan of the roof © Sergey Skuratov ARCHITECTS
Multifunctional integrated development of the Sofiyskaya Embankment. Entrances for the residents © Sergey Skuratov ARCHITECTS
Multifunctional integrated development of the Sofiyskaya Embankment. Entrances for the residents © Sergey Skuratov ARCHITECTS
Multifunctional integrated development of the Sofiyskaya Embankment. Entrances to the private territory © Sergey Skuratov ARCHITECTS
Multifunctional integrated development of the Sofiyskaya Embankment. Plan of the apartment with one bedroom © Sergey Skuratov ARCHITECTS
Multifunctional integrated development of the Sofiyskaya Embankment. Plan of the apartment with two bedrooms (Type 1) © Sergey Skuratov ARCHITECTS
Multifunctional integrated development of the Sofiyskaya Embankment. Plan of the apartment with two bedrooms (Type 2) © Sergey Skuratov ARCHITECTS
Multifunctional integrated development of the Sofiyskaya Embankment. Plan of the apartment with three bedrooms © Sergey Skuratov ARCHITECTS
Multifunctional integrated development of the Sofiyskaya Embankment. Plan of the two-level apartment with two bedrooms © Sergey Skuratov ARCHITECTS
Multifunctional integrated development of the Sofiyskaya Embankment. Penthouse © Sergey Skuratov ARCHITECTS
Multifunctional integrated development of the Sofiyskaya Embankment. Option for transforming the apartments © Sergey Skuratov ARCHITECTS
Multifunctional integrated development of the Sofiyskaya Embankment. Option for transforming the apartments © Sergey Skuratov ARCHITECTS
Multifunctional integrated development of the Sofiyskaya Embankment. Option for transforming the apartments © Sergey Skuratov ARCHITECTS


29 October 2015

Headlines now
Living in the Architecture of One’s Own Making
Do architects design houses for themselves? You bet! In this article, we are examining a new book by TATLIN publishing house. This book – unprecedented for Russia – features 52 private homes designed and built by contemporary architects for themselves. It includes houses that are famous, even iconic, as well as lesser-known ones; large and small, stylish and eccentric. To some extent, the book reflects the history of Russian architecture over the past 30 years.
A City Block Isoline
Another competition project for a residential complex on the banks of the Volga in Nizhny Novgorod has been prepared by Studio 44. A team of architects led by Ivan Kozhin concluded that using a regular block layout in such a location would be inappropriate and developed a “custom design” approach: a chain of parceled multi-section buildings stretching along the entire embankment. Let’s explore the features and advantages of this unconventional method.
Competition: The Price of Creativity?
Any day now, we’re expecting the results of a competition held by the “Samolet” development group for a plot in Kommunarka. In the meantime, we share the impressions of Editor-in-Chief Julia Tarabarina, who managed to conduct a public talk. Though technically focused on the interaction between developers and architects, the public talk turned into a discussion about the pros and cons of architectural competitions.
Terraced Design
The “River Park” residential complex has confidently and securely shaped the Nagatinsky Backwater shoreline. Featuring a public embankment, elevated courtyards connected by pedestrian bridges, and brick façades, the development invites exploration of its nuanced response to the surrounding context, as well as hints of the architects’ megalithic design thinking.
A Kremlin’s Core and Meteorite Fragments
We continue our coverage of the competition projects for the residential district that the development company GloraX plans to build along the embankment of the Rowing Channel in Nizhny Novgorod. ASADOV Architects approached the concept through a deep dive into local identity, using storytelling to pinpoint a central idea for the design: the master plan and composition are imagined as if a meteorite had struck a “proto-Kremlin”. Sounds weird? Find more details below!
The Volga Regatta
GloraX plans to develop a residential complex spanning 14 hectares along the Volga River in Nizhny Novgorod. The winning design in a closed-door competition, created by GORA Architects, features housing typologies ranging from townhouses to terraced high-rise slabs, a balance of functions, diverse ways of engaging with the water, and even a dedicated island (no less!) for the city residents.
A New Track
We took a thorough look at D_Station, a railcar repair depot dating back to 1906, recently reconstructed while preserving its century-old industrial structure, upon the project by Sergey Trukhanov and T+T Architects. Though work on the interiors – set to house restaurants and public spaces – is still underway, the building’s exterior already offers plenty to see. Visitors can explore the blend of old and new brickwork, appreciate the architect’s unique interpretation of ruin aesthetics, and enjoy the newly built pedestrian route that connects the Citydel Business Center’s arches to Kazakova Street.
Four Different Surveys
The “Explore the City” competition, organized this year by the Genplan Institute of Moscow, stands out as a pretty unconventional one for the architectural field but aligns perfectly well with the character of urban planning work. The winning project analyzed contemporary residential complexes, combining urban planning insights with a realtor’s perspective to propose a hybrid approach. Other entries explored public centers, motivations for car ownership, and housing vacancy rates. A fifth participant withdrew. Here’s a closer look at the four completed works.
Scheduled Evolution
ASADOV Architects unveiled the EvyCenter pavilion, a microcultural hub for fostering personal growth, organizing workshops, and doing gymnastics. Additionally, this pavilion serves as a prototype for a scalable country house, drawing inspiration from the “Loskutok” project, and constructed from CLT panels in a factory. This marks the beginning of a developer project initiated by the architectural firm (sic!), which is seeking partners to expand both small Evy settlements and even larger Evy cities, which are, according to Andrey Asadov, aimed at fostering the “evolutionary” development of the people who will inhabit them.
The Golden Crown
The concept for a dental clinic in Yekaterinburg, developed by CNTR Studio, revolves around the idea of a “mouth full of gold”: pristine white porcelain stoneware walls are complemented by matte brass details. To avoid an overly literal interpretation, the architects focused on the building’s proportions, skillfully navigating between sunlight requirements and fire safety regulations.
Flexibility and Integration
Not long ago, we covered the project for the fourth phase of the ÁLIA residential complex, designed by APEX. Now, we’ve been shown different fence concepts they developed to enclose the complex’s private courtyards, incorporating a variety of public functions. We believe that the sheer fact that the complex’s architects were involved in such a detail as fencing speaks volumes.
A Step Forward
The HIDE residential complex represents a major milestone for ADM architects and their leaders Andrey Romanov and Ekaterina Kuznetsova in their quest for a fresh high-rise aesthetic – one that is flexible and layered, capable of bringing vibrancy to mass and silhouette while shaping form. Over recent years, this approach has become ADM’s “signature style”, with the golden HIDE tower playing a pivotal role in its evolution. Here, we delve into the project’s story, explore the details of the complex’s design, and uncover its core essence.
Gold in the Sands
A new office for a transcontinental company specializing in resource extraction and processing has opened in Dubai. Designed by T+T Architects, masters of creating spaces that are contemporary, diverse, flexible, and original, this project exemplifies their expertise. On the executive floor, a massive brass-clad partition dominates, while layered textures of compressed earth create a contextually resonant backdrop.
Layers and Levels of Flight
This project goes way back – Reserve Union won this architectural competition at the end of 2011, and the building was completed in 2018, so it’s practically “archival”. However, despite being relatively unknown, the building can hardly be considered “dated” and remains a prime example of architectural expression, particularly in the headquarters genre. And it’s especially fitting for an aviation company office. In some ways, it resembles the Aeroflot headquarters at Sheremetyevo but with its own unique identity, following the signature style of Vladimir Plotkin. In this article, we take an in-depth look at the United Aircraft Corporation (UAC) headquarters in the Moscow agglomeration town of Zhukovsky, supplemented by recent photographs from Alexey Naroditsky – a shoot that became only recently possible due to the fact that improvements were finally made in the surrounding area.
Light and Shadow
In this article, we delve into the architectural design of the “Chaika” house by DNK ag architects, which was recently completed in 2023 as part of the collection of signature designs at ZILArt. As is well-known, all the buildings in this complex follow a design code, yet each one is distinct. This particular building stands out not only for its whiteness and minimalism but also for the refined use of a limited number of techniques that, together, create what can confidently be called synergy.
Casus Novae
A master plan was developed for a large residential area with a name of “DNS City”, but now that its implementation began, the plan has been arbitrarily reformatted and replaced with something that, while similar on the surface, is actually quite different. This is not the first time such a thing happens, but it’s always frustrating. With permission from the author, we are sharing Maria Elkina’s post.
Treasure Hunting
The GAFA bureau, in collaboration with Tegola and Arkhitail, organized an expedition to the island of Kilpola in Karelia as part of Moskomarkhitektura’s “Open City” festival. There, amidst moss and rocks, the students sought answers to questions like: what is the sacred, where does it dwell, and what sustains it? Assisting the participants in this quest were landscape engineer Evgeny Levin, artist Nicholas Roerich, a moose, and the lack of cellular connection. Here’s how the story unfolded.
Depths of the Earth, Streams of Water
In the Malaya Okhta district, the Akzent building, designed by Stepan Liphart, was constructed. It follows a classic tripartite structure, yet it’s what you might call “hand-drawn”: each façade is unique in its form and details, some of which aren’t immediately noticeable. In this article, we explore the context and, together with the architect, delve into how the form was developed.
Fir Tree Dynamics
The “Airports of Region” holding is planning to build an airport in Karachay-Cherkessia, aiming to make the Arkhyz and Dombay resorts more accessible to travelers. The project that won in an invitation-only competition, submitted by Sergey Nikeshkin’s KPLN, blends natural imagery inspired by the shape of a conifer seed, open-air waiting spaces, majestic large trees, and a green roof elevated on needle-like columns. The result is both nature-inspired and WOW.
​A Brick Shell
In the process of designing a clubhouse situated among pine trees in a prestigious suburban area near Moscow, the architectural firm “A.Len” did the façade design part. The combination of different types of brick and masonry correlates with the volumetric and plastique solutions, further enhanced by the inclusion of wood-painted fragments and metal “glazing”.
Word Forms
ATRIUM architects love ambitious challenges, and for the firm’s thirtieth anniversary, they boldly play a game of words with an exhibition that dives deep into a self-created vocabulary. They immerse their projects – especially art installations – into this glossary, as if plunging into a current of their own. You feel as if you’re flowing through the veins of pure art, immersed in a universe of vertical cities, educational spaces – of which the architects are true masters – and the cultural codes of various locations. But what truly captivates is the bold statement that Vera Butko and Anton Nadtochy make, both through their work and this exhibition: architecture, above all, is art – the art of working with form and space.
Flexibility and Acuteness of Modernity
Luxurious, fluid, large “kokoshniks” and spiral barrel columns, as if made from colorful chewing gum: there seem to be no other mansion like this in Moscow, designed in the “Neo-Russian-Modern” style. And the “Teremok” on Malaya Kaluzhskaya, previously somewhat obscure, has “come alive with new colors” and gained visibility after its restoration for the office of the “architectural ecosystem” as the architects love to call themselves. It’s evident that Julius Borisov and the architects at UNK put their hearts into finding this new office and bringing it up to date. Let’s delve into the paradoxes of this mansion’s history and its plasticity. Spoiler: two versions of modernity meet here, both balancing on the razor’s edge of “what’s current”.
Yuri Vissarionov: “A modular house does not belong to the land”
It belongs to space, or to the air... It turns out that 3D printing is more effective when combined with a modular approach: the house is built in a workshop and then adapted to the site, including on uneven terrain. Yuri Vissarionov shares his latest experience in designing tourist complexes, both in central Russia and in the south. These include houseboats, homes printed from lightweight concrete using a 3D printer, and, of course, frame houses.
​Moscow’s First
“The quality of education largely depends on the quality of the educational environment”. This principle of the last decade has been realized by Sergey Skuratov in the project for the First Moscow Gymnasium on Rostovskaya Embankment in the Khamovniki district. The building seamlessly integrates into the complex urban landscape, responding both to the pedestrian flow of the city and the quiet alleyways. It skillfully takes advantage of the height differences and aligns with modern trends in educational space design. Let’s take a closer look.
Looking at the Water
The site of Villa Sonata stretches from the road to the water’s edge, offering its own shoreline, pier, and a picturesque river panorama. To reveal these sweeping views, Roman Leonidov “cut” the façade diagonally parallel to the river, thus getting two main axes for the house and, consequently, “two heads”. The internal core – two double-height spaces, a living room and a conservatory, with a “bridge” above them – makes the house both “transparent” and filled with light.
The White Wing
Well, it’s not exactly white. It’s more of a beige, white-stone structure that plays with the color of limestone – smoother surfaces are lighter, while rougher ones are darker. This wing unites various elements: it absorbs and interprets the surrounding themes. It responds to everything, yet maintains a cohesive expression – a challenging task! – while also incorporating recognizable features of its own, such as the dynamic cuts at the bottom, top, and middle.
Urban Dunes
The XSA Ramps team designed and built a three-part sports hub for a park in Rostov-on-Don, welcoming people of all ages and fitness levels. The skate plaza, pump track, and playground are all meticulously crafted with details that attract a diverse range of visitors. The technical execution of the shapes and slopes transforms this space into a kind of sculptural composition.
Proportional Growth
The project for the fourth phase of the ÁLIA residential area has been announced. The buildings are situated on an elongated plot – almost a “ray” that shoots out from the center of the area towards the river. Their layout reflects both a response to Moscow’s architectural preferences over the past 15 years, shifting “from blocks to towers”, and an interpretation of the neighboring business park designed by SOM. Additionally, the best apartments here are not located at the very top but closer to the middle, forming a glowing “waistline”.
The “Staircase” Building
In designing the “Details” residential complex in New Moscow, Rais Baishev spiced up the now-popular Moscow theme of a “courtyard” building with an idea drawn from the surrealist drawings by Maurits Escher. He envisioned the stepped silhouettes and descending slopes as a metaphysical mega-staircase, creating a key void within the courtyard that gave the project an internal “spine”. This concept is felt both in the building’s silhouette and on its façades.
Projection of the Quarter
No one doubted that the building that Vladimir Plotkin designed as part of the “Garden Quarters” would be the most modernist of all. And it turned out just that way: while adhering to the common design code, the building successfully combines brick and white stone, rhythmically responding to the neighboring building designed by Ostozhenka, yet tactfully and persistently making a few statements of its own. This includes the projection of the ideal urban development composition “14–9–6”, which can be found right next door, mathematical calculations, including those for various types of terraces (and perhaps the only reminder of the Soviet past of the Kauchuk rubber factory!), and the white “cross-stitch” pattern of the façade grid.