По-русски

Window of Power

Meditating on the subject of how the new Parliamentary Center of the Russian Federation might look like, the team of architects headed by Alexander Asadov and Karen Saprichyan proposed to build, within the framework of Moscow City, a building with a golden niche on the main facade and a giant sphere of the congress hall suspended inside of it.

17 July 2013
Object
mainImg
Architect:
Alexander Asadov
Karen Saprichyan
Firm:
Mosproekt-2 Office №19
GrandProektCity
Object:
Parliamentary Center of the Russian Federation
Russia, Moscow, Moscow International Business Center “Moscow City”

Project Team:
Mosproject-2 named after M.Posokhin, Grand Project City, Asadov Architectural Bureau. Architects: M.Posokhin, A.Asadov, K.Saprichyan, I.Korenev

2012

For the record, we will say straight away that this project will not be implemented - it relates to the list of experimental developments that our authors are so fond of. Their portfolio has in it quite a few of such proposals and concepts - the kilometer-tall TV-tower or the recreational complex "Mirax-Garden", so much remembered by many people. The architects themselves call these projects "Alternative Moscow", appreciating the opportunity to let their imagination go free in terms of how the Russian capital might have looked like, had it not been for the ball and chain of the construction restrictions and other limitations. As for the customers, they, in turn, fully appreciate Alexander Asadov's readiness to think out of the box and look into the future (of this particular city and of architecture in general) with optimism, and this is why the architects get such proposals on a regular basis. This time the "alternative reality" theme came in the form of placing the Parliamentary Center in the place of the unfinished building of Moscow Government in Moscow International Business Center.

As the architects themselves explain, this idea came up last fall, at the point when it became clear that the territories of the "New Moscow" are not ready, in terms of their infrastructure, to accommodate for the large numbers of federal agencies. As is known, the Deputies of the State Duma were also against moving beyond the confines of the Moscow Ring Road, and thus the capital started searching for an alternative site for the Parliamentary Center. One of the options was duly represented by Moscow City business center where a large site is still lying idle - the one that was once allotted for the construction of the capital's city council. Actually, the city council building has been partially erected (the construction work died down back in 2010, first because of the global crisis, and then it stopped forever because the city council opted out of moving to the new place at all), so, as their starting point, the architects got quite a specific task - make analysis as to whether this suspended construction could at all be finished to fit the needs of the federal power. The architects were to make it into the existing construction blueprint, engaging the already-built underground part of the complex, and at the same time they were to design a building that would be simultaneously spacious and dramatic-looking.

The construction site of Moscow International Business Center is quite familiar to the Asadovs. Back in 2003, they took part in the tender for the building of Moscow City Council, and in 2004 they designed, in a nearby area, a high-rise business center in the shape of a tower widening out at the top and "giving birth" to yet another building. Returning to the site ten years later, the architects deliberately chose a different tactic proposing not the vertical centerpiece but a dramatic composition of "volume within a volume". “We opted out of designing a skyscraper for a whole number of reasons - Alexander Asadov explains - First of all, there are far too many of them in Moscow City as it is: in the cityscape this district looks like a stockade of verticals, and it really made no sense adding yet another "pole" to it. And, second of all, the very functional program of the designed center made us create several volumes - due to the fact that this complex was to unite the upper and lower Houses of Parliament".

What the authors do is assemble the Parliamentary Center from functional blocks of various shapes and forms. This looks like a game of 3D Tetris of sorts in which blocks of a simple rectangular shape form independent buildings of the State Duma and Federation Council, while the S and П-shaped links form the premises for joint work of the deputies and the members of the Federation Council, as well as the various auxiliary services. As for the car park, it is completely isolated as a separate "brick" that is set against the main building from behind and is connected to it with a covered passage that serves as the continuation of the main lobby. The first six levels of the complex are allotted for the Library of Parliament - this, according to Alexander Asadov and Karen Saprichyan would not only be convenient for the government officials but truly symbolic as well - the common basis for the work of both houses would be the law-books. Besides, the square configuration of the original building ideally served to accommodate the library that, to be quite straightforward about it, least of all needs any experiments with its shape and layout.

As for the structure that the architects place on top of the library, it looks nothing like the classic skyscraper. Rather, it looks like a window or a window frame: off a square-section tower, the authors take away most of the corner that faces the Moskva River, as well as from the opposite corner, and then they embellish this niche with a deep horizontal slit in such a way that the building "looks" at the Bagration Bridge not with a massive dull facade but with a graceful niche. The unusual form of the opening is also enhanced with its coating - the niche is finished with metallic panels of copper hue and glass of a similar shade. The main adornment of the niche, though, is not even its golden lining but the egg-like volume inserted inside of it - these are the the convention halls, one for each of the houses, and a common one. If we look at the Parliamentary Center from the embankment we will get a complete illusion of this glittering flattened ball simply hovering in the air having miraculously found itself under the cantilever of the Federation Council block. The architects go a long way to maintain this illusion: the covered passage that leads to the main building is designed in such a way that it is not to be seen from any angle, while the supporting poles that prop the sphere up from below are masked by the appropriately set trees and the metallic-glass coating.

The height of the upper link that in fact makes the building look like a giant window and connects the two towers into a single whole, is three floors. Here the authors were planning to place the offices of the support staff of the chairmen of the State Duma and the Federation council, as well as the representatives of the Chief of State. This is also symbolic: the ruling power structure is placed at the very top having, just in case, a few helicopter landings handy. Oh, by the way, about the fire prevention measures: the laconic finish of the facades and the windows that are arrayed into thin vertical lines (at some places in pairs and in some places as "stocks" 5-6 floors high) completely conceal the three technical floors that allow, if necessary, for complete isolation of the library, the premises meant for the joint work of the Deputies and the members of the Federation Council, the fractions of the State Duma, and the committees of the Federation Council, as well as the top echelons of power. In front of the building, the architects make a small square that is accessed from the Krasnopresnenskaya Embankment by a wide staircase. All this put together - the plaza that is elevated above the river, the glittering zeppelin hovering above it, and the frame of the high-rise golden on the inside, endow the Russian Parliament with an image that is bright, and, possibly, even too "progressive".




Architect:
Alexander Asadov
Karen Saprichyan
Firm:
Mosproekt-2 Office №19
GrandProektCity
Object:
Parliamentary Center of the Russian Federation
Russia, Moscow, Moscow International Business Center “Moscow City”

Project Team:
Mosproject-2 named after M.Posokhin, Grand Project City, Asadov Architectural Bureau. Architects: M.Posokhin, A.Asadov, K.Saprichyan, I.Korenev

2012

17 July 2013

Headlines now
A Paper Clip above the River
In this article, we talk with Vitaly Lutz from the Genplan Institute of Moscow about the design and unique features of the pedestrian bridge that now links the two banks of the Yauza River in the new cluster of Bauman Moscow State Technical University (MSTU). The bridge’s form and functionality – particularly the inclusion of an amphitheater suspended over the river – were conceived during the planning phase of the territory’s development. Typically, this approach is not standard practice, but the architects advocate for it, referring to this intermediate project phase as the “pre-AGR” stage (AGR stands for Architectural and Urban Planning Approval). Such a practice, they argue, helps define key parameters of future projects and bridge the gap between urban planning and architectural design.
Living in the Architecture of One’s Own Making
Do architects design houses for themselves? You bet! In this article, we are examining a new book by TATLIN publishing house. This book – unprecedented for Russia – features 52 private homes designed and built by contemporary architects for themselves. It includes houses that are famous, even iconic, as well as lesser-known ones; large and small, stylish and eccentric. To some extent, the book reflects the history of Russian architecture over the past 30 years.
A City Block Isoline
Another competition project for a residential complex on the banks of the Volga in Nizhny Novgorod has been prepared by Studio 44. A team of architects led by Ivan Kozhin concluded that using a regular block layout in such a location would be inappropriate and developed a “custom design” approach: a chain of parceled multi-section buildings stretching along the entire embankment. Let’s explore the features and advantages of this unconventional method.
Competition: The Price of Creativity?
Any day now, we’re expecting the results of a competition held by the “Samolet” development group for a plot in Kommunarka. In the meantime, we share the impressions of Editor-in-Chief Julia Tarabarina, who managed to conduct a public talk. Though technically focused on the interaction between developers and architects, the public talk turned into a discussion about the pros and cons of architectural competitions.
Terraced Design
The “River Park” residential complex has confidently and securely shaped the Nagatinsky Backwater shoreline. Featuring a public embankment, elevated courtyards connected by pedestrian bridges, and brick façades, the development invites exploration of its nuanced response to the surrounding context, as well as hints of the architects’ megalithic design thinking.
A Kremlin’s Core and Meteorite Fragments
We continue our coverage of the competition projects for the residential district that the development company GloraX plans to build along the embankment of the Rowing Channel in Nizhny Novgorod. ASADOV Architects approached the concept through a deep dive into local identity, using storytelling to pinpoint a central idea for the design: the master plan and composition are imagined as if a meteorite had struck a “proto-Kremlin”. Sounds weird? Find more details below!
The Volga Regatta
GloraX plans to develop a residential complex spanning 14 hectares along the Volga River in Nizhny Novgorod. The winning design in a closed-door competition, created by GORA Architects, features housing typologies ranging from townhouses to terraced high-rise slabs, a balance of functions, diverse ways of engaging with the water, and even a dedicated island (no less!) for the city residents.
Life Plans
The master plan for the residential district “Prityazheniye” (“Gravity”) in Naberezhnye Chelny was developed by the architectural company A.Len, taking into account the specific urban planning context and partially implemented solutions of the first phase. However, the master plan prioritized its own values: a green framework, a system of focal points, a hierarchy of spaces, and pedestrian priority. After this, the question of what residents will do in their neighborhood simply doesn’t arise.
A New Track
We took a thorough look at D_Station, a railcar repair depot dating back to 1906, recently reconstructed while preserving its century-old industrial structure, upon the project by Sergey Trukhanov and T+T Architects. Though work on the interiors – set to house restaurants and public spaces – is still underway, the building’s exterior already offers plenty to see. Visitors can explore the blend of old and new brickwork, appreciate the architect’s unique interpretation of ruin aesthetics, and enjoy the newly built pedestrian route that connects the Citydel Business Center’s arches to Kazakova Street.
Four Different Surveys
The “Explore the City” competition, organized this year by the Genplan Institute of Moscow, stands out as a pretty unconventional one for the architectural field but aligns perfectly well with the character of urban planning work. The winning project analyzed contemporary residential complexes, combining urban planning insights with a realtor’s perspective to propose a hybrid approach. Other entries explored public centers, motivations for car ownership, and housing vacancy rates. A fifth participant withdrew. Here’s a closer look at the four completed works.
Scheduled Evolution
ASADOV Architects unveiled the EvyCenter pavilion, a microcultural hub for fostering personal growth, organizing workshops, and doing gymnastics. Additionally, this pavilion serves as a prototype for a scalable country house, drawing inspiration from the “Loskutok” project, and constructed from CLT panels in a factory. This marks the beginning of a developer project initiated by the architectural firm (sic!), which is seeking partners to expand both small Evy settlements and even larger Evy cities, which are, according to Andrey Asadov, aimed at fostering the “evolutionary” development of the people who will inhabit them.
The Golden Crown
The concept for a dental clinic in Yekaterinburg, developed by CNTR Studio, revolves around the idea of a “mouth full of gold”: pristine white porcelain stoneware walls are complemented by matte brass details. To avoid an overly literal interpretation, the architects focused on the building’s proportions, skillfully navigating between sunlight requirements and fire safety regulations.
Flexibility and Integration
Not long ago, we covered the project for the fourth phase of the ÁLIA residential complex, designed by APEX. Now, we’ve been shown different fence concepts they developed to enclose the complex’s private courtyards, incorporating a variety of public functions. We believe that the sheer fact that the complex’s architects were involved in such a detail as fencing speaks volumes.
A Step Forward
The HIDE residential complex represents a major milestone for ADM architects and their leaders Andrey Romanov and Ekaterina Kuznetsova in their quest for a fresh high-rise aesthetic – one that is flexible and layered, capable of bringing vibrancy to mass and silhouette while shaping form. Over recent years, this approach has become ADM’s “signature style”, with the golden HIDE tower playing a pivotal role in its evolution. Here, we delve into the project’s story, explore the details of the complex’s design, and uncover its core essence.
Gold in the Sands
A new office for a transcontinental company specializing in resource extraction and processing has opened in Dubai. Designed by T+T Architects, masters of creating spaces that are contemporary, diverse, flexible, and original, this project exemplifies their expertise. On the executive floor, a massive brass-clad partition dominates, while layered textures of compressed earth create a contextually resonant backdrop.
Layers and Levels of Flight
This project goes way back – Reserve Union won this architectural competition at the end of 2011, and the building was completed in 2018, so it’s practically “archival”. However, despite being relatively unknown, the building can hardly be considered “dated” and remains a prime example of architectural expression, particularly in the headquarters genre. And it’s especially fitting for an aviation company office. In some ways, it resembles the Aeroflot headquarters at Sheremetyevo but with its own unique identity, following the signature style of Vladimir Plotkin. In this article, we take an in-depth look at the United Aircraft Corporation (UAC) headquarters in the Moscow agglomeration town of Zhukovsky, supplemented by recent photographs from Alexey Naroditsky – a shoot that became only recently possible due to the fact that improvements were finally made in the surrounding area.
Light and Shadow
In this article, we delve into the architectural design of the “Chaika” house by DNK ag architects, which was recently completed in 2023 as part of the collection of signature designs at ZILArt. As is well-known, all the buildings in this complex follow a design code, yet each one is distinct. This particular building stands out not only for its whiteness and minimalism but also for the refined use of a limited number of techniques that, together, create what can confidently be called synergy.
Casus Novae
A master plan was developed for a large residential area with a name of “DNS City”, but now that its implementation began, the plan has been arbitrarily reformatted and replaced with something that, while similar on the surface, is actually quite different. This is not the first time such a thing happens, but it’s always frustrating. With permission from the author, we are sharing Maria Elkina’s post.
Treasure Hunting
The GAFA bureau, in collaboration with Tegola and Arkhitail, organized an expedition to the island of Kilpola in Karelia as part of Moskomarkhitektura’s “Open City” festival. There, amidst moss and rocks, the students sought answers to questions like: what is the sacred, where does it dwell, and what sustains it? Assisting the participants in this quest were landscape engineer Evgeny Levin, artist Nicholas Roerich, a moose, and the lack of cellular connection. Here’s how the story unfolded.
Depths of the Earth, Streams of Water
In the Malaya Okhta district, the Akzent building, designed by Stepan Liphart, was constructed. It follows a classic tripartite structure, yet it’s what you might call “hand-drawn”: each façade is unique in its form and details, some of which aren’t immediately noticeable. In this article, we explore the context and, together with the architect, delve into how the form was developed.
Fir Tree Dynamics
The “Airports of Region” holding is planning to build an airport in Karachay-Cherkessia, aiming to make the Arkhyz and Dombay resorts more accessible to travelers. The project that won in an invitation-only competition, submitted by Sergey Nikeshkin’s KPLN, blends natural imagery inspired by the shape of a conifer seed, open-air waiting spaces, majestic large trees, and a green roof elevated on needle-like columns. The result is both nature-inspired and WOW.
​A Brick Shell
In the process of designing a clubhouse situated among pine trees in a prestigious suburban area near Moscow, the architectural firm “A.Len” did the façade design part. The combination of different types of brick and masonry correlates with the volumetric and plastique solutions, further enhanced by the inclusion of wood-painted fragments and metal “glazing”.
Word Forms
ATRIUM architects love ambitious challenges, and for the firm’s thirtieth anniversary, they boldly play a game of words with an exhibition that dives deep into a self-created vocabulary. They immerse their projects – especially art installations – into this glossary, as if plunging into a current of their own. You feel as if you’re flowing through the veins of pure art, immersed in a universe of vertical cities, educational spaces – of which the architects are true masters – and the cultural codes of various locations. But what truly captivates is the bold statement that Vera Butko and Anton Nadtochy make, both through their work and this exhibition: architecture, above all, is art – the art of working with form and space.
Flexibility and Acuteness of Modernity
Luxurious, fluid, large “kokoshniks” and spiral barrel columns, as if made from colorful chewing gum: there seem to be no other mansion like this in Moscow, designed in the “Neo-Russian-Modern” style. And the “Teremok” on Malaya Kaluzhskaya, previously somewhat obscure, has “come alive with new colors” and gained visibility after its restoration for the office of the “architectural ecosystem” as the architects love to call themselves. It’s evident that Julius Borisov and the architects at UNK put their hearts into finding this new office and bringing it up to date. Let’s delve into the paradoxes of this mansion’s history and its plasticity. Spoiler: two versions of modernity meet here, both balancing on the razor’s edge of “what’s current”.
Yuri Vissarionov: “A modular house does not belong to the land”
It belongs to space, or to the air... It turns out that 3D printing is more effective when combined with a modular approach: the house is built in a workshop and then adapted to the site, including on uneven terrain. Yuri Vissarionov shares his latest experience in designing tourist complexes, both in central Russia and in the south. These include houseboats, homes printed from lightweight concrete using a 3D printer, and, of course, frame houses.
​Moscow’s First
“The quality of education largely depends on the quality of the educational environment”. This principle of the last decade has been realized by Sergey Skuratov in the project for the First Moscow Gymnasium on Rostovskaya Embankment in the Khamovniki district. The building seamlessly integrates into the complex urban landscape, responding both to the pedestrian flow of the city and the quiet alleyways. It skillfully takes advantage of the height differences and aligns with modern trends in educational space design. Let’s take a closer look.
Looking at the Water
The site of Villa Sonata stretches from the road to the water’s edge, offering its own shoreline, pier, and a picturesque river panorama. To reveal these sweeping views, Roman Leonidov “cut” the façade diagonally parallel to the river, thus getting two main axes for the house and, consequently, “two heads”. The internal core – two double-height spaces, a living room and a conservatory, with a “bridge” above them – makes the house both “transparent” and filled with light.
The White Wing
Well, it’s not exactly white. It’s more of a beige, white-stone structure that plays with the color of limestone – smoother surfaces are lighter, while rougher ones are darker. This wing unites various elements: it absorbs and interprets the surrounding themes. It responds to everything, yet maintains a cohesive expression – a challenging task! – while also incorporating recognizable features of its own, such as the dynamic cuts at the bottom, top, and middle.
Urban Dunes
The XSA Ramps team designed and built a three-part sports hub for a park in Rostov-on-Don, welcoming people of all ages and fitness levels. The skate plaza, pump track, and playground are all meticulously crafted with details that attract a diverse range of visitors. The technical execution of the shapes and slopes transforms this space into a kind of sculptural composition.
Proportional Growth
The project for the fourth phase of the ÁLIA residential area has been announced. The buildings are situated on an elongated plot – almost a “ray” that shoots out from the center of the area towards the river. Their layout reflects both a response to Moscow’s architectural preferences over the past 15 years, shifting “from blocks to towers”, and an interpretation of the neighboring business park designed by SOM. Additionally, the best apartments here are not located at the very top but closer to the middle, forming a glowing “waistline”.