The Return of the Project

Story of the project office and retail building on Kulneva Street (better known under its former name of “Mirax Plaza”) losing its designer supervision, being re-done, and then finally getting back into the hands of its authors to retrieve its architectural integrity.

Written by:
Alla Pavlikova, Julia Tarabarina
Translated by:
Anton Mizonov

10 December 2012

Object

Architect:

Firm:

Sergey Kisselev & Partners

Object:

Administrative and retail complex at Kulnev str.
Russia, Moscow, Kutuzovsky prospect (crossing with Kulnev street)

Project Team:
Sergej Kiselev, Andrey Nikiforov, Andrey Breslavcev, Anton Busalov, Gleb Holopov, Elena Klueva
Engineers: Igor Shvarcman, Konstantin Spiridonov

6.2006 — 9.2007 / 10.2007

The client: OAO “Mezhdunarodny Centr”

The project of the office complex “Mirax Plaza” is well known to anyone interested in the contemporary Moscow (see our article on the 2007 project). Although after the global financial crisis set in and the main investor left the project, it lost its proud-sounding name, the two austere prismatic towers saluting to the Moscow City skyscrapers from the opposite side of the Moskva River, are still almost complete and are clearly visible to the cars driving by down the Third Transport Ring.

The towers, however, were but a part of the entire concept. The other part of it was the group of ten-storey buildings inscribed into the neat oval of the layout at the foot of the two high-rises. The yellow stone buildings braced by dramatic horizontal ribs looking a lot like flying buttresses, had to continue the row of Stalin-era buildings standing along Kutuzov Avenue, and create an offset contrast to the office towers.

The previous version of "Mirax-Plaza" project

However, as often is the case, not everything went to plan. The designer supervision over the construction of part of the “island” (the building that is turned onto Kutuzov Avenue and that makes up the “nose” of the oval), was handed over to another architectural office, the project was changed, and the building was not built the way it had been intended. In a nutshell, it was generalized and simplified: now there was less stone, more glass, and the horizontal ribs, while still preserved, became thinner and more monotonous. The casing blocks, from horizontal and tawny, with “scorch marks” so characteristic of Stalin times houses, turned into pink-gray and vertical, now looking very much like “seashell” casing that was used back in the 1970’s for coating the Soviet movie theaters and office buildings.

The building on the Kutuzov Avenue, built with neither designer supervision nor with “Sergey Kisselev and Partners”. Photo: panoramio.com, stargate

During the work on the ten-storey building that in fact makes up the elongated part of the oval situated next to the Third Transport Ring (designated by the letter "B" on the various layouts of the complex) it became clear that keeping its original shape would be impossible due to the recent changes in the land-use and development rules of the adjacent section of the railroad line. "While formerly our situation provided the opportunity of placing the stylobate pillars directly on this railroad section, now the agency for land-use would not even condescend to considering such a possibility" - the architects share. In other words, according to the original design, the volume of Building "B" and the railroad line actually crossed: the dome-shaped arch of the facade would have overhung the tunnel that pierced the volume of the building from side to side chordwise but now the building was to recede into the confines of its construction site.

The original layout

The commissioner announced a tender for the design adjustment of the ten-story building - naturally, with a view to preserve in the new project the original square footage with expenses minimized. For the architectural office "Sergey Kisselev and Partners" this in fact was a chance to retrieve its original project, and finally bring it to fruition. Knowing their own project inside and out, the architects quickly found the solution to the problem that was set before them. The design, of course, underwent a few significant changes (under the given circumstances it simply could not have been otherwise) but the authors "did their best to consider the structures that were already erected and were making all of their planning decisions, if it's possible to put it like this, in the reconstruction mode". In a word, they only proposed to make the most necessary changes, at the same time giving back to the project all of its original useful space.

The regular-shaped, compasses-drawn but protruding too far beyond the confines of the site arch of the oval layout had to get cut off to make room for the railroad line - the layout of the building was no longer a segment and took on the constrained and squeezed shape, like a 1960's TV with straight sides and rounded corners.

Site plan

In order to compensate for the lost useful square footage, the architects divided the elongated building into five parts, replacing the four atriums with open courtyards. Each of the five resulting volumes got expanded lengthwise at the expense of reducing the space of the yards. This measure helped to retrieve all the lost square meters without increasing the height of the buildings. The yards, in the meantime, started looking more like short fragments of pedestrian boulevards: they all lead to the longitudinal inner street that connects all the five buildings. The latter, at the same time, overhang in deep cantilevers above the pedestrian space thus winning yet some more useful space and forming small marquees over the boulevards below.

Visualization. Project of 2012. Version 2.

What is peculiar is the fact that the architects deliberately opted out of making their "yard" streets car-passable, fully reserving them for the pedestrians. This resonates a little with a reminder about the cancelled deluxe atriums - the yards, of course, lack the luxury of their glass surfaces stretched at a ten-storey height but they still remain the safe and comfortable space to be in. Unlike the atriums, however, the yards are open to the city and thus are more democratic: anyone can walk in and around here. This solution is more on the European than on Moscow side: Moscow is still having a difficult time getting rid of its endless fences and checkpoints, so the open little streets of the office center are a small but still an important step to meet the city community halfway.

The pass-through pedestrian street of Building B

The facades, of course, also had to be remodeled: now they are made up of the same alternating pattern of horizontal stripes of stone and glass as the towers. At the rounded side walls the stripes get narrower - here they resonate with the graphics of the building that stands on the side of the Kutuzovsky Avenue. As we can see, the architects ultimately came to one of the most wide-spread, if not to say "classical" facade techniques of office architecture. The striking-looking "arrested" cascade of stone braces that in the original project was meant to bring association of the age of high speeds and similar technogenious things, has now turned into a respectable office street. Still, the authors have been able to restore the project's integrity, which was particularly important to them. The "courtyard" streets splitting the once-single building into five separate volumes, will look, at a quick glance cast from the side of the Third Transport Ring, like narrow slits and will not violate the integrity of the facade's image. Andrew Nikiforov is also positive that the architects have ultimately been able to keep the idea of the "oval island".

View from the Third Transport Ring

One cannot but be happy about the fact that the shattered and scattered project got almost unexpectedly "fixed". This story once again goes to show that a competent architect will always be able to solve the commissioner's situation as well as retrieve the all-but-lost project to restore its integrity and find a new image for it.

This "new image" that came as a result of the transformation described, is also worth special mentioning. It is more relaxed, more practical, and more democratic. "Mirax-Plaza", though austere and conceptual, was still dramatic and expensive-looking. It was meant to strike one's imagination with the glass of the atriums, the flying buttresses, and the regular arches and circles. Its architecture sported the contrastive tension: between the concrete and glass, the towers and the avenue (the former being the symbol of the power of money, the latter - the power of the tyrant). The contradictions of the city were aptly reflected in it and turned into a dramatic and powerful story. Which was quite resonant with the times: the period of quick growth, arrogant investors, and giant projects.

Now the contrasts are all but erased, the contradictions are softened, and the story is taken to a whole new level: now it has ceased, to a large extent, being a theatrical performance arrested in stone, and has started looking more like the natural history of finding common ground, reasonable economy, and architectural integrity. The complex is stepping back from the obstacle that its predecessor was stepping upon but at the same time it opens its arms and lets itself into the city. These are marks of our times - possibly, just as good as one can think of.

Architect:

Firm:

Sergey Kisselev & Partners

Object:

10 December 2012

Headlines now

Object

Layers and Levels of Flight

This project goes way back – Reserve Union won this architectural competition at the end of 2011, and the building was completed in 2018, so it’s practically “archival”. However, despite being relatively unknown, the building can hardly be considered “dated” and remains a prime example of architectural expression, particularly in the headquarters genre. And it’s especially fitting for an aviation company office. In some ways, it resembles the Aeroflot headquarters at Sheremetyevo but with its own unique identity, following the signature style of Vladimir Plotkin. In this article, we take an in-depth look at the United Aircraft Corporation (UAC) headquarters in the Moscow agglomeration town of Zhukovsky, supplemented by recent photographs from Alexey Naroditsky – a shoot that became only recently possible due to the fact that improvements were finally made in the surrounding area.

Object

Light and Shadow

In this article, we delve into the architectural design of the “Chaika” house by DNK ag architects, which was recently completed in 2023 as part of the collection of signature designs at ZILArt. As is well-known, all the buildings in this complex follow a design code, yet each one is distinct. This particular building stands out not only for its whiteness and minimalism but also for the refined use of a limited number of techniques that, together, create what can confidently be called synergy.

View

Casus Novae

A master plan was developed for a large residential area with a name of “DNS City”, but now that its implementation began, the plan has been arbitrarily reformatted and replaced with something that, while similar on the surface, is actually quite different. This is not the first time such a thing happens, but it’s always frustrating. With permission from the author, we are sharing Maria Elkina’s post.

Report

Treasure Hunting

The GAFA bureau, in collaboration with Tegola and Arkhitail, organized an expedition to the island of Kilpola in Karelia as part of Moskomarkhitektura’s “Open City” festival. There, amidst moss and rocks, the students sought answers to questions like: what is the sacred, where does it dwell, and what sustains it? Assisting the participants in this quest were landscape engineer Evgeny Levin, artist Nicholas Roerich, a moose, and the lack of cellular connection. Here’s how the story unfolded.

Object

Depths of the Earth, Streams of Water

In the Malaya Okhta district, the Akzent building, designed by Stepan Liphart, was constructed. It follows a classic tripartite structure, yet it’s what you might call “hand-drawn”: each façade is unique in its form and details, some of which aren’t immediately noticeable. In this article, we explore the context and, together with the architect, delve into how the form was developed.

Object

Fir Tree Dynamics

The “Airports of Region” holding is planning to build an airport in Karachay-Cherkessia, aiming to make the Arkhyz and Dombay resorts more accessible to travelers. The project that won in an invitation-only competition, submitted by Sergey Nikeshkin’s KPLN, blends natural imagery inspired by the shape of a conifer seed, open-air waiting spaces, majestic large trees, and a green roof elevated on needle-like columns. The result is both nature-inspired and WOW.

Object

A Brick Shell

In the process of designing a clubhouse situated among pine trees in a prestigious suburban area near Moscow, the architectural firm “A.Len” did the façade design part. The combination of different types of brick and masonry correlates with the volumetric and plastique solutions, further enhanced by the inclusion of wood-painted fragments and metal “glazing”.

Report

Word Forms

ATRIUM architects love ambitious challenges, and for the firm’s thirtieth anniversary, they boldly play a game of words with an exhibition that dives deep into a self-created vocabulary. They immerse their projects – especially art installations – into this glossary, as if plunging into a current of their own. You feel as if you’re flowing through the veins of pure art, immersed in a universe of vertical cities, educational spaces – of which the architects are true masters – and the cultural codes of various locations. But what truly captivates is the bold statement that Vera Butko and Anton Nadtochy make, both through their work and this exhibition: architecture, above all, is art – the art of working with form and space.

Object

Flexibility and Acuteness of Modernity

Luxurious, fluid, large “kokoshniks” and spiral barrel columns, as if made from colorful chewing gum: there seem to be no other mansion like this in Moscow, designed in the “Neo-Russian-Modern” style. And the “Teremok” on Malaya Kaluzhskaya, previously somewhat obscure, has “come alive with new colors” and gained visibility after its restoration for the office of the “architectural ecosystem” as the architects love to call themselves. It’s evident that Julius Borisov and the architects at UNK put their hearts into finding this new office and bringing it up to date. Let’s delve into the paradoxes of this mansion’s history and its plasticity. Spoiler: two versions of modernity meet here, both balancing on the razor’s edge of “what’s current”.

Interview

Yuri Vissarionov: “A modular house does not belong to the land”

It belongs to space, or to the air... It turns out that 3D printing is more effective when combined with a modular approach: the house is built in a workshop and then adapted to the site, including on uneven terrain. Yuri Vissarionov shares his latest experience in designing tourist complexes, both in central Russia and in the south. These include houseboats, homes printed from lightweight concrete using a 3D printer, and, of course, frame houses.

Object

Moscow’s First

“The quality of education largely depends on the quality of the educational environment”. This principle of the last decade has been realized by Sergey Skuratov in the project for the First Moscow Gymnasium on Rostovskaya Embankment in the Khamovniki district. The building seamlessly integrates into the complex urban landscape, responding both to the pedestrian flow of the city and the quiet alleyways. It skillfully takes advantage of the height differences and aligns with modern trends in educational space design. Let’s take a closer look.

Object

Looking at the Water

The site of Villa Sonata stretches from the road to the water’s edge, offering its own shoreline, pier, and a picturesque river panorama. To reveal these sweeping views, Roman Leonidov “cut” the façade diagonally parallel to the river, thus getting two main axes for the house and, consequently, “two heads”. The internal core – two double-height spaces, a living room and a conservatory, with a “bridge” above them – makes the house both “transparent” and filled with light.

Object

The White Wing

Well, it’s not exactly white. It’s more of a beige, white-stone structure that plays with the color of limestone – smoother surfaces are lighter, while rougher ones are darker. This wing unites various elements: it absorbs and interprets the surrounding themes. It responds to everything, yet maintains a cohesive expression – a challenging task! – while also incorporating recognizable features of its own, such as the dynamic cuts at the bottom, top, and middle.

Object

Urban Dunes

The XSA Ramps team designed and built a three-part sports hub for a park in Rostov-on-Don, welcoming people of all ages and fitness levels. The skate plaza, pump track, and playground are all meticulously crafted with details that attract a diverse range of visitors. The technical execution of the shapes and slopes transforms this space into a kind of sculptural composition.

Object

Proportional Growth

The project for the fourth phase of the ÁLIA residential area has been announced. The buildings are situated on an elongated plot – almost a “ray” that shoots out from the center of the area towards the river. Their layout reflects both a response to Moscow’s architectural preferences over the past 15 years, shifting “from blocks to towers”, and an interpretation of the neighboring business park designed by SOM. Additionally, the best apartments here are not located at the very top but closer to the middle, forming a glowing “waistline”.

Object

The “Staircase” Building

In designing the “Details” residential complex in New Moscow, Rais Baishev spiced up the now-popular Moscow theme of a “courtyard” building with an idea drawn from the surrealist drawings by Maurits Escher. He envisioned the stepped silhouettes and descending slopes as a metaphysical mega-staircase, creating a key void within the courtyard that gave the project an internal “spine”. This concept is felt both in the building’s silhouette and on its façades.

Object

Projection of the Quarter

No one doubted that the building that Vladimir Plotkin designed as part of the “Garden Quarters” would be the most modernist of all. And it turned out just that way: while adhering to the common design code, the building successfully combines brick and white stone, rhythmically responding to the neighboring building designed by Ostozhenka, yet tactfully and persistently making a few statements of its own. This includes the projection of the ideal urban development composition “14–9–6”, which can be found right next door, mathematical calculations, including those for various types of terraces (and perhaps the only reminder of the Soviet past of the Kauchuk rubber factory!), and the white “cross-stitch” pattern of the façade grid.

Object

Domus Aurea

In this issue, we examine the “Tessinsky-1” house, designed by Sergey Skuratov and completed in 2023. Located in the middle of the Serebryanicheskaya Embankment district, at the intersection of its main streets, this house assumes a sort of “nodal” role: it not only responds to everything around it and preserves many memories of the former EMA factory within itself, but it weaves all this into a newly directed pattern, reconciling bright “gold” and dark-colored brick, largely with the help of the new, modern-yet-archaic Columba brick, which, come to think about it, is the most precious element here.

send.project

The Chimney of Nikola-Lenivets

In this issue, we are examining the “Obelisk House” designed by KATARSIS and built for the Arkhstoyanie 2023 festival. However, it was only finished later on, and this is why we are examining it now. It seems to us that after the “Obelisk House” appeared in Nikola-Lenivets, a dialogue and a few inner connections appeared between the temporary structures built here. These houses no longer look like “accidental neighbors”, more of which below.

Periscope by the Bay

The jury awarded the second place in the competition for a public and cultural center in Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky to the companies GORA (“Mountain”) and M4. In the consortium’s proposal, the building resembles a sperm whale with a calf swimming next to it or a periscope, whose lenses capture the most spectacular views from the surrounding landscape.

Contest Results

From Arcs to Dolmens

While working on the competition project for Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky, ASADOV Architects prioritized the value of the natural and urban environment, aiming to preserve the balance of the location while minimizing the resemblance of the volume that they designed to a “traditional building”. The task was challenging, and the architects created three versions, one of which having been developed after the competition, where their main proposal took third place. However, the point of interest here is not the competition result but the continuity of creative thinking.

Object

Hide and Seek

The ID Moskovskiy house, designed by Stepan Liphart in St. Petersburg, in the courtyards near Moskovskiy Avenue beyond the Obvodny Canal and recently completed, is notable for several reasons. Firstly, it has been realized with considerable accuracy, which is particularly significant as this is the first building where the architect was responsible not only for the facades but also for the layouts, allowing for better integration between the two. On the other hand, this building is interesting as an example of the “germination” of new architecture in the city: it draws on the best examples from the neighborhood and becomes an improved and developed sum of ideas found by the architect in the surrounding context.

The Big Twelve

Yesterday, the winners of the Moscow Mayor’s Architecture Award were announced and honored. Let’s take a look at what was awarded and, in some cases, even critique this esteemed award. After all, there is always room for improvement, right?

Object

Above the Golden Horn

The residential complex “Philosophy” designed by T+T architects in Vladivostok, is one of the new projects in the “Golubinaya Pad” area, changing its development philosophy (pun intended) from single houses to a comprehensive approach. The buildings are organized along public streets, varying in height and format, with one house even executed in gallery typology, featuring a cantilever leaning on an art object.

Report

Nuanced Alternative

How can you rhyme a square and space? Easily! But to do so, you need to rhyme everything you can possibly think of: weave everything together, like in a tensegrity structure, and find your own optics too. The new exhibition at GES-2 does just that, offering its visitor a new perspective on the history of art spanning 150 years, infused with the hope for endless multiplicity of worlds and art histories. Read on to see how this is achieved and how the exhibition design by Evgeny Ace contributes to it.

Object

Blinds for Ice

An ice arena has been constructed in Domodedovo based on a project by Yuri Vissarionov Architects. To prevent the long façade, a technical requirement for winter sports facilities, from appearing monotonous, the architects proposed the use of suspended structures with multidirectional slats. This design protects the ice from direct sunlight while giving the wall texture and detail.

Contest Results

Frozen Magma

A competition for the creation of a public and cultural center was held in Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky. Three architectural companies made it to the final, and we consider it important to share about the work of each. Let’s start with the winner – the consortium led by Wowhaus.

Report

Campus within a Day

In this article, we talk about what the participants of Genplan Institute of Moscow’s hackathon were doing at the MosComArchitecture booth at the “ArchMoscow” exhibition. We also discuss who won the prize and why, and what can be done with the territory of a small university on the outskirts of Moscow.

Overview

Vertical Civilization

Genpro considered the development of the vertical city concept and made it the theme of their pavilion at the “ArchMoscow” exhibition.

Interview

Marina Yegorova: “We think in terms of hectares, not square meters”

The career path of architect Marina Yegorova is quite impressive: MARHI, SPEECH, MosComArchitectura, the Genplan Institute of Moscow, and then her own architectural company. Its name Empate, which refers to the words “to draw” in Portuguese and “to empathize” in English, should not be misleading with its softness, as the firm freely works on different scales, including Integrated Territorial Development projects. We talked with Marina about various topics: urban planning experience, female leadership style, and even the love of architects for yachting.