По-русски

Field of Life

The new project by the architectural company PNKB (an acronym for “Design, Research, and Advisory Bureau”), led by Sergey Gnedovsky and Anton Lyubimkin, for the Kulikovo Field Museum is dedicated to the field as a concept in its own right. The field has long been a focus of the museum’s thorough and successful research. Accordingly, the exterior of the new museum building is gentler than that of its predecessor, which was also designed by PNKB and dedicated specifically to the historic battle. Inside, however, the building confidently guides the visitor from a luminous atrium along a spiral path to the field – interpreted here as a field of life.

30 December 2024
Object
mainImg
 
I’ve placed them all, each in their place,
And spread the field below for space
For battle, I prepared the field,
With trees, I’ve lined it, fully sealed,
With oaks and firs, I’ve set the frame,
And bushes here and there proclaim,
With tender grass, the ground I clad,
And filled it with small bugs I had
Dmitry Prigov, “Kulikovo Field”

I started school in the year of the 600th anniversary of the Battle of Kulikovo, in 1980. That anniversary of the historic battle became a significant component of Soviet patriotic propaganda and was widely and diversely celebrated. I vividly remember our class visiting exhibitions held at the State Historical Museum and the Tretyakov Gallery for the occasion. Beyond the special museum exhibits, the topic inspired slide films, educational TV programs, and even substantial sections in children’s textbooks (as history wasn’t a standalone subject in the lower grades). My memory is filled with historical and legendary details: the introductory duel between Peresvet and Chelubey, the ambush regiment led by Voivode Bobrok, Prince Dmitry burning the bridges... The year 1380 stood out as one of the key historical dates I carried with me from elementary school, so the significance of the Battle of Kulikovo for Russian history was never in question for me.

Thus, it was kind of a surprise for me to learn that the first full-fledged museum exhibit at the site of this historic event wasn’t opened until that same anniversary year of 1980, and a dedicated museum was established only 16 years later, in 1996.

That said, the diverse and dynamic work of the museum staff has been so impressive that it’s now hard to believe the museum is only 28 years old.

Since 2016, the task of “museumification” of events directly connected to the Battle of Kulikovo has been carried out by the Kulikovo Battle Museum, whose building was also designed by the PNKB. This museum, located in the village of Mokhovoe at the heart of the historic battlefield, was detailed by Yulia Shishalova for Archi.ru at the time.

In addition to this building, located in the village of Mokhovoe at the heart of the historic field, the State “Reserve” Museum “Kulikovo Field” also includes other numerous institutions, whose exhibits are often not directly connected to the titular event. For instance, the displays at the complex in the village of Monastyrshchino, north of the battlefield, cover the history of the surrounding lands from the Great Migration of Peoples to the historic battle with Mamai, while the exhibits in the nearby settlement of Epifan are dedicated to merchant life in the 19th–20th centuries.

The area around the battlefield also includes several memorial structures. Among these, the most fascinating, in my view, is the Church of St. Sergius of Radonezh, a memorial built in 1917 on Red Hill, south of the battlefield, designed by Alexey Shchusev. Both this church and the Church of the Nativity of the Most Holy Mother of God in Monastyrshchino (architect Alexander Bocharnikov, 1884), now under the jurisdiction of the Russian Orthodox Church, have at various times housed museum exhibits or temporary exhibitions.

Yet, within the “reserve” museum, there is still no dedicated building devoted to one of its principal treasures: the field itself.

Its vast expanse, spanning more than 7,500 hectares, constitutes 65% of all the specially protected steppe areas in the Tula region. A third of the animal and plant species found here are listed as endangered species. Unsurprisingly, the museum operates not only as a historical site but also as a nature reserve. Its staff actively work to conserve and study this significant natural resource: combating poaching, setting up camera traps to document rare animals, monitoring the condition of natural landmarks, and collecting herbarium and entomological specimens. They also engage in unique efforts to “restore the forest and steppe sections of the battlefield within their historical boundaries of the 14th century”, based on research into the changes in natural and cultural landscapes over centuries.

They are even growing oak groves and planting feather grass!

The natural aspect of the field is currently explored in part of the underground level of the Kulikovo Battle Museum. However, with the introduction of the new “Russian Field” museum, whose architectural concept was unveiled in November 2024 at the “Zodchestvo” exhibition, the narrative of “studying and restoring the natural and historical landscape of Kulikovo Field” is set to become much more detailed and vivid. The goal of the new project, as unanimously stated by both the institution’s representatives and the architects, is to “highlight this commemorative site not only as a battlefield but also as a field of life”.

The Russian Field Museum. Satellite footage
Copyright: © Architecture and Cultural Policy PNKB


The concept for the building, which is planned for construction in the village of Monastyrshchino to mark the 650th anniversary of the Battle of Kulikovo, was developed by the familiar team behind the Kulikovo Battle Museum – PNKB’s Architecture and Cultural Policy Bureau. This project continues their long-standing collaboration with the “reserve” museum, naturally inviting comparisons between the two museum buildings designed 15 years apart.

The Russian Field Museum. View from the highway
Copyright: © Architecture and Cultural Policy PNKB


Like the 2016 building, the new structure appears to grow out of the ground. Visitors will also be able to ascend unobstructed from the field to the roof, where the view from this elevated point will not only allow them to admire the surrounding landscape’s beauty but also grasp the sheer scale of the field.

From this vantage, the visitors might spot the roof of the museum in Mokhovoe, located 5 km to the south, and beyond it, on Red Hill, Shchusev’s church and the 1852 memorial column (designed by Alexander Brullov).

The Russian Field Museum. A facade detail
Copyright: © Architecture and Cultural Policy PNKB


The external appearance of the “Russian Field” is significantly softer than that of the Kulikovo Battle Museum. From most angles, the new museum resembles sun-scorched, wind-bent blades of giant feather grass or an enormous bundle of straw. This “gentle” image, reflecting the more peaceful theme of the new exhibition, is further enhanced by the architects’ choice of façade materials. The building, which is plan-wise reminiscent of a giant snail, is clad in diagonally laid logs forming a hyperbolic surface. This hyperboloid – a smooth form composed of straight lines – is ideally suited to fulfilling the task of harmonizing nature and geometry.

  • zooming
    1 / 3
    The Russian Field Museum. Plan of the basement floor
    Copyright: © Architecture and Cultural Policy PNKB
  • zooming
    2 / 3
    The Russian Field Museum. Plan of the 1st floor
    Copyright: © Architecture and Cultural Policy PNKB
  • zooming
    3 / 3
    The Russian Field Museum. Section view
    Copyright: © Architecture and Cultural Policy PNKB


The spiral – the shape that forms the basis of the floor plan – evokes an obvious set of quite appropriate associations: it is the shell of an ancient mollusk, the spiral of evolution connecting this mollusk with modern forms of life, and the spiral of history linking us with the contemporaries of Dmitry Donskoy...

Perhaps a less obvious association is with a compressor, which creates excessive pressure inside the building. This pressure allows the concentrated Kulikovo natural and historical context to be placed in the halls, gathered evenly like dust with a vacuum cleaner from the entire surface of the field and even partly from its depths.

The Russian Field Museum. View from the highway
Copyright: © Architecture and Cultural Policy PNKB


The Russian Field Museum. The entrance
Copyright: © Architecture and Cultural Policy PNKB


However, the main task of the spiral structure, according to the project’s authors, is to prepare the visitors – who arrive at the “reserve” museum through “less prominent” fields – for the visual and tactile perception of the historically significant natural space. This is why the architects confidently guide the flow of visitors along a strictly defined route, far more imperatively than in the Kulikovo Battle Museum. Visitors entering the building from the access road are first “sucked” into its very center.

The Russian Field Museum. Scheme 1. The entrance
Copyright: © Architecture and Cultural Policy PNKB


“This shift is absolutely necessary” – explains architect Anton Lyubimkin – “So that the person first enters a space that, in some sense, contrasts with the Field”. This space is represented by the well, connecting the first and basement floors, illuminated through a skylight in the roof. Compared to the surrounding expanses, it is tight and, according to the architect’s concept, is meant to “immerse the person into itself”. There, Anton continues, “the field space unfolds in such a way that the visitor to the museum inevitably lifts their head upwards, and at some point, we see the sky, and there occurs an awareness of the inner freedom that exists regardless of physical freedom...”

The Russian Field Museum. Scheme 2. The well
Copyright: © Architecture and Cultural Policy PNKB


After spending some time on the balcony encircling the well at ground level, the “compressor” building first sends the guest downward to the basement and then upward – along the steps of the halls in the expanding coils of the spiral.

The Russian Field Museum. Scheme 3. The visitor′s route
Copyright: © Architecture and Cultural Policy PNKB


The detailed conceptual content of the exhibition is still being developed under the guidance of the renowned designer Anton Fyodorov, but one can already grasp the basic idea of it from the architects’ descriptions: at each stage of the exhibition, the field reveals a new aspect to the visitor, starting from geology and soils, through the diversity of everything that grows and runs across the surface, to the air above the field, and ending with all the birds and butterflies that the field contains.

The Russian Field Museum. Fragment of the exposition space on the first floor
Copyright: © Architecture and Cultural Policy PNKB


As the visitor moves from underground to the sky, the exhibition space expands. On the second, outer coil, part of the exhibition becomes the actual field itself: here, the museum space reaches the external glazed wall, beyond which the field emerges through the slanted palisade of logs.

The Russian Field Museum. Scheme 4. The exit to the field
Copyright: © Architecture and Cultural Policy PNKB


At the end of the journey, the spiral path “throws” the “prepared” visitor outside, with their face to the field, about which they now know much more, and are ready for a conscious immersion into this simultaneously unique and typical Russian landscape.
The Russian Field Museum. Top view
Copyright: © Architecture and Cultural Policy PNKB
The Russian Field Museum. Scheme 4. The exit to the field and acention to the roof, view from the south, from the side of the Kulikovo field
Copyright: © Architecture and Cultural Policy PNKB
The Russian Field Museum. Location plan
Copyright: © Architecture and Cultural Policy PNKB


30 December 2024

Headlines now
Field of Life
The new project by the architectural company PNKB (an acronym for “Design, Research, and Advisory Bureau”), led by Sergey Gnedovsky and Anton Lyubimkin, for the Kulikovo Field Museum is dedicated to the field as a concept in its own right. The field has long been a focus of the museum’s thorough and successful research. Accordingly, the exterior of the new museum building is gentler than that of its predecessor, which was also designed by PNKB and dedicated specifically to the historic battle. Inside, however, the building confidently guides the visitor from a luminous atrium along a spiral path to the field – interpreted here as a field of life.
A Paper Clip above the River
In this article, we talk with Vitaly Lutz from the Genplan Institute of Moscow about the design and unique features of the pedestrian bridge that now links the two banks of the Yauza River in the new cluster of Bauman Moscow State Technical University (MSTU). The bridge’s form and functionality – particularly the inclusion of an amphitheater suspended over the river – were conceived during the planning phase of the territory’s development. Typically, this approach is not standard practice, but the architects advocate for it, referring to this intermediate project phase as the “pre-AGR” stage (AGR stands for Architectural and Urban Planning Approval). Such a practice, they argue, helps define key parameters of future projects and bridge the gap between urban planning and architectural design.
Living in the Architecture of One’s Own Making
Do architects design houses for themselves? You bet! In this article, we are examining a new book by TATLIN publishing house. This book – unprecedented for Russia – features 52 private homes designed and built by contemporary architects for themselves. It includes houses that are famous, even iconic, as well as lesser-known ones; large and small, stylish and eccentric. To some extent, the book reflects the history of Russian architecture over the past 30 years.
A City Block Isoline
Another competition project for a residential complex on the banks of the Volga in Nizhny Novgorod has been prepared by Studio 44. A team of architects led by Ivan Kozhin concluded that using a regular block layout in such a location would be inappropriate and developed a “custom design” approach: a chain of parceled multi-section buildings stretching along the entire embankment. Let’s explore the features and advantages of this unconventional method.
Competition: The Price of Creativity?
Any day now, we’re expecting the results of a competition held by the “Samolet” development group for a plot in Kommunarka. In the meantime, we share the impressions of Editor-in-Chief Julia Tarabarina, who managed to conduct a public talk. Though technically focused on the interaction between developers and architects, the public talk turned into a discussion about the pros and cons of architectural competitions.
Terraced Design
The “River Park” residential complex has confidently and securely shaped the Nagatinsky Backwater shoreline. Featuring a public embankment, elevated courtyards connected by pedestrian bridges, and brick façades, the development invites exploration of its nuanced response to the surrounding context, as well as hints of the architects’ megalithic design thinking.
A Kremlin’s Core and Meteorite Fragments
We continue our coverage of the competition projects for the residential district that the development company GloraX plans to build along the embankment of the Rowing Channel in Nizhny Novgorod. ASADOV Architects approached the concept through a deep dive into local identity, using storytelling to pinpoint a central idea for the design: the master plan and composition are imagined as if a meteorite had struck a “proto-Kremlin”. Sounds weird? Find more details below!
The Volga Regatta
GloraX plans to develop a residential complex spanning 14 hectares along the Volga River in Nizhny Novgorod. The winning design in a closed-door competition, created by GORA Architects, features housing typologies ranging from townhouses to terraced high-rise slabs, a balance of functions, diverse ways of engaging with the water, and even a dedicated island (no less!) for the city residents.
Life Plans
The master plan for the residential district “Prityazheniye” (“Gravity”) in Naberezhnye Chelny was developed by the architectural company A.Len, taking into account the specific urban planning context and partially implemented solutions of the first phase. However, the master plan prioritized its own values: a green framework, a system of focal points, a hierarchy of spaces, and pedestrian priority. After this, the question of what residents will do in their neighborhood simply doesn’t arise.
A New Track
We took a thorough look at D_Station, a railcar repair depot dating back to 1906, recently reconstructed while preserving its century-old industrial structure, upon the project by Sergey Trukhanov and T+T Architects. Though work on the interiors – set to house restaurants and public spaces – is still underway, the building’s exterior already offers plenty to see. Visitors can explore the blend of old and new brickwork, appreciate the architect’s unique interpretation of ruin aesthetics, and enjoy the newly built pedestrian route that connects the Citydel Business Center’s arches to Kazakova Street.
Four Different Surveys
The “Explore the City” competition, organized this year by the Genplan Institute of Moscow, stands out as a pretty unconventional one for the architectural field but aligns perfectly well with the character of urban planning work. The winning project analyzed contemporary residential complexes, combining urban planning insights with a realtor’s perspective to propose a hybrid approach. Other entries explored public centers, motivations for car ownership, and housing vacancy rates. A fifth participant withdrew. Here’s a closer look at the four completed works.
Scheduled Evolution
ASADOV Architects unveiled the EvyCenter pavilion, a microcultural hub for fostering personal growth, organizing workshops, and doing gymnastics. Additionally, this pavilion serves as a prototype for a scalable country house, drawing inspiration from the “Loskutok” project, and constructed from CLT panels in a factory. This marks the beginning of a developer project initiated by the architectural firm (sic!), which is seeking partners to expand both small Evy settlements and even larger Evy cities, which are, according to Andrey Asadov, aimed at fostering the “evolutionary” development of the people who will inhabit them.
The Golden Crown
The concept for a dental clinic in Yekaterinburg, developed by CNTR Studio, revolves around the idea of a “mouth full of gold”: pristine white porcelain stoneware walls are complemented by matte brass details. To avoid an overly literal interpretation, the architects focused on the building’s proportions, skillfully navigating between sunlight requirements and fire safety regulations.
Flexibility and Integration
Not long ago, we covered the project for the fourth phase of the ÁLIA residential complex, designed by APEX. Now, we’ve been shown different fence concepts they developed to enclose the complex’s private courtyards, incorporating a variety of public functions. We believe that the sheer fact that the complex’s architects were involved in such a detail as fencing speaks volumes.
A Step Forward
The HIDE residential complex represents a major milestone for ADM architects and their leaders Andrey Romanov and Ekaterina Kuznetsova in their quest for a fresh high-rise aesthetic – one that is flexible and layered, capable of bringing vibrancy to mass and silhouette while shaping form. Over recent years, this approach has become ADM’s “signature style”, with the golden HIDE tower playing a pivotal role in its evolution. Here, we delve into the project’s story, explore the details of the complex’s design, and uncover its core essence.
Gold in the Sands
A new office for a transcontinental company specializing in resource extraction and processing has opened in Dubai. Designed by T+T Architects, masters of creating spaces that are contemporary, diverse, flexible, and original, this project exemplifies their expertise. On the executive floor, a massive brass-clad partition dominates, while layered textures of compressed earth create a contextually resonant backdrop.
Layers and Levels of Flight
This project goes way back – Reserve Union won this architectural competition at the end of 2011, and the building was completed in 2018, so it’s practically “archival”. However, despite being relatively unknown, the building can hardly be considered “dated” and remains a prime example of architectural expression, particularly in the headquarters genre. And it’s especially fitting for an aviation company office. In some ways, it resembles the Aeroflot headquarters at Sheremetyevo but with its own unique identity, following the signature style of Vladimir Plotkin. In this article, we take an in-depth look at the United Aircraft Corporation (UAC) headquarters in the Moscow agglomeration town of Zhukovsky, supplemented by recent photographs from Alexey Naroditsky – a shoot that became only recently possible due to the fact that improvements were finally made in the surrounding area.
Light and Shadow
In this article, we delve into the architectural design of the “Chaika” house by DNK ag architects, which was recently completed in 2023 as part of the collection of signature designs at ZILArt. As is well-known, all the buildings in this complex follow a design code, yet each one is distinct. This particular building stands out not only for its whiteness and minimalism but also for the refined use of a limited number of techniques that, together, create what can confidently be called synergy.
Casus Novae
A master plan was developed for a large residential area with a name of “DNS City”, but now that its implementation began, the plan has been arbitrarily reformatted and replaced with something that, while similar on the surface, is actually quite different. This is not the first time such a thing happens, but it’s always frustrating. With permission from the author, we are sharing Maria Elkina’s post.
Treasure Hunting
The GAFA bureau, in collaboration with Tegola and Arkhitail, organized an expedition to the island of Kilpola in Karelia as part of Moskomarkhitektura’s “Open City” festival. There, amidst moss and rocks, the students sought answers to questions like: what is the sacred, where does it dwell, and what sustains it? Assisting the participants in this quest were landscape engineer Evgeny Levin, artist Nicholas Roerich, a moose, and the lack of cellular connection. Here’s how the story unfolded.
Depths of the Earth, Streams of Water
In the Malaya Okhta district, the Akzent building, designed by Stepan Liphart, was constructed. It follows a classic tripartite structure, yet it’s what you might call “hand-drawn”: each façade is unique in its form and details, some of which aren’t immediately noticeable. In this article, we explore the context and, together with the architect, delve into how the form was developed.
Fir Tree Dynamics
The “Airports of Region” holding is planning to build an airport in Karachay-Cherkessia, aiming to make the Arkhyz and Dombay resorts more accessible to travelers. The project that won in an invitation-only competition, submitted by Sergey Nikeshkin’s KPLN, blends natural imagery inspired by the shape of a conifer seed, open-air waiting spaces, majestic large trees, and a green roof elevated on needle-like columns. The result is both nature-inspired and WOW.
​A Brick Shell
In the process of designing a clubhouse situated among pine trees in a prestigious suburban area near Moscow, the architectural firm “A.Len” did the façade design part. The combination of different types of brick and masonry correlates with the volumetric and plastique solutions, further enhanced by the inclusion of wood-painted fragments and metal “glazing”.
Word Forms
ATRIUM architects love ambitious challenges, and for the firm’s thirtieth anniversary, they boldly play a game of words with an exhibition that dives deep into a self-created vocabulary. They immerse their projects – especially art installations – into this glossary, as if plunging into a current of their own. You feel as if you’re flowing through the veins of pure art, immersed in a universe of vertical cities, educational spaces – of which the architects are true masters – and the cultural codes of various locations. But what truly captivates is the bold statement that Vera Butko and Anton Nadtochy make, both through their work and this exhibition: architecture, above all, is art – the art of working with form and space.
Flexibility and Acuteness of Modernity
Luxurious, fluid, large “kokoshniks” and spiral barrel columns, as if made from colorful chewing gum: there seem to be no other mansion like this in Moscow, designed in the “Neo-Russian-Modern” style. And the “Teremok” on Malaya Kaluzhskaya, previously somewhat obscure, has “come alive with new colors” and gained visibility after its restoration for the office of the “architectural ecosystem” as the architects love to call themselves. It’s evident that Julius Borisov and the architects at UNK put their hearts into finding this new office and bringing it up to date. Let’s delve into the paradoxes of this mansion’s history and its plasticity. Spoiler: two versions of modernity meet here, both balancing on the razor’s edge of “what’s current”.
Yuri Vissarionov: “A modular house does not belong to the land”
It belongs to space, or to the air... It turns out that 3D printing is more effective when combined with a modular approach: the house is built in a workshop and then adapted to the site, including on uneven terrain. Yuri Vissarionov shares his latest experience in designing tourist complexes, both in central Russia and in the south. These include houseboats, homes printed from lightweight concrete using a 3D printer, and, of course, frame houses.
​Moscow’s First
“The quality of education largely depends on the quality of the educational environment”. This principle of the last decade has been realized by Sergey Skuratov in the project for the First Moscow Gymnasium on Rostovskaya Embankment in the Khamovniki district. The building seamlessly integrates into the complex urban landscape, responding both to the pedestrian flow of the city and the quiet alleyways. It skillfully takes advantage of the height differences and aligns with modern trends in educational space design. Let’s take a closer look.
Looking at the Water
The site of Villa Sonata stretches from the road to the water’s edge, offering its own shoreline, pier, and a picturesque river panorama. To reveal these sweeping views, Roman Leonidov “cut” the façade diagonally parallel to the river, thus getting two main axes for the house and, consequently, “two heads”. The internal core – two double-height spaces, a living room and a conservatory, with a “bridge” above them – makes the house both “transparent” and filled with light.
The White Wing
Well, it’s not exactly white. It’s more of a beige, white-stone structure that plays with the color of limestone – smoother surfaces are lighter, while rougher ones are darker. This wing unites various elements: it absorbs and interprets the surrounding themes. It responds to everything, yet maintains a cohesive expression – a challenging task! – while also incorporating recognizable features of its own, such as the dynamic cuts at the bottom, top, and middle.
Urban Dunes
The XSA Ramps team designed and built a three-part sports hub for a park in Rostov-on-Don, welcoming people of all ages and fitness levels. The skate plaza, pump track, and playground are all meticulously crafted with details that attract a diverse range of visitors. The technical execution of the shapes and slopes transforms this space into a kind of sculptural composition.