По-русски

Field of Life

The new project by the architectural company PNKB (an acronym for “Design, Research, and Advisory Bureau”), led by Sergey Gnedovsky and Anton Lyubimkin, for the Kulikovo Field Museum is dedicated to the field as a concept in its own right. The field has long been a focus of the museum’s thorough and successful research. Accordingly, the exterior of the new museum building is gentler than that of its predecessor, which was also designed by PNKB and dedicated specifically to the historic battle. Inside, however, the building confidently guides the visitor from a luminous atrium along a spiral path to the field – interpreted here as a field of life.

30 December 2024
Object
mainImg
 
I’ve placed them all, each in their place,
And spread the field below for space
For battle, I prepared the field,
With trees, I’ve lined it, fully sealed,
With oaks and firs, I’ve set the frame,
And bushes here and there proclaim,
With tender grass, the ground I clad,
And filled it with small bugs I had
Dmitry Prigov, “Kulikovo Field”

I started school in the year of the 600th anniversary of the Battle of Kulikovo, in 1980. That anniversary of the historic battle became a significant component of Soviet patriotic propaganda and was widely and diversely celebrated. I vividly remember our class visiting exhibitions held at the State Historical Museum and the Tretyakov Gallery for the occasion. Beyond the special museum exhibits, the topic inspired slide films, educational TV programs, and even substantial sections in children’s textbooks (as history wasn’t a standalone subject in the lower grades). My memory is filled with historical and legendary details: the introductory duel between Peresvet and Chelubey, the ambush regiment led by Voivode Bobrok, Prince Dmitry burning the bridges... The year 1380 stood out as one of the key historical dates I carried with me from elementary school, so the significance of the Battle of Kulikovo for Russian history was never in question for me.

Thus, it was kind of a surprise for me to learn that the first full-fledged museum exhibit at the site of this historic event wasn’t opened until that same anniversary year of 1980, and a dedicated museum was established only 16 years later, in 1996.

That said, the diverse and dynamic work of the museum staff has been so impressive that it’s now hard to believe the museum is only 28 years old.

Since 2016, the task of “museumification” of events directly connected to the Battle of Kulikovo has been carried out by the Kulikovo Battle Museum, whose building was also designed by the PNKB. This museum, located in the village of Mokhovoe at the heart of the historic battlefield, was detailed by Yulia Shishalova for Archi.ru at the time.

In addition to this building, located in the village of Mokhovoe at the heart of the historic field, the State “Reserve” Museum “Kulikovo Field” also includes other numerous institutions, whose exhibits are often not directly connected to the titular event. For instance, the displays at the complex in the village of Monastyrshchino, north of the battlefield, cover the history of the surrounding lands from the Great Migration of Peoples to the historic battle with Mamai, while the exhibits in the nearby settlement of Epifan are dedicated to merchant life in the 19th–20th centuries.

The area around the battlefield also includes several memorial structures. Among these, the most fascinating, in my view, is the Church of St. Sergius of Radonezh, a memorial built in 1917 on Red Hill, south of the battlefield, designed by Alexey Shchusev. Both this church and the Church of the Nativity of the Most Holy Mother of God in Monastyrshchino (architect Alexander Bocharnikov, 1884), now under the jurisdiction of the Russian Orthodox Church, have at various times housed museum exhibits or temporary exhibitions.

Yet, within the “reserve” museum, there is still no dedicated building devoted to one of its principal treasures: the field itself.

Its vast expanse, spanning more than 7,500 hectares, constitutes 65% of all the specially protected steppe areas in the Tula region. A third of the animal and plant species found here are listed as endangered species. Unsurprisingly, the museum operates not only as a historical site but also as a nature reserve. Its staff actively work to conserve and study this significant natural resource: combating poaching, setting up camera traps to document rare animals, monitoring the condition of natural landmarks, and collecting herbarium and entomological specimens. They also engage in unique efforts to “restore the forest and steppe sections of the battlefield within their historical boundaries of the 14th century”, based on research into the changes in natural and cultural landscapes over centuries.

They are even growing oak groves and planting feather grass!

The natural aspect of the field is currently explored in part of the underground level of the Kulikovo Battle Museum. However, with the introduction of the new “Russian Field” museum, whose architectural concept was unveiled in November 2024 at the “Zodchestvo” exhibition, the narrative of “studying and restoring the natural and historical landscape of Kulikovo Field” is set to become much more detailed and vivid. The goal of the new project, as unanimously stated by both the institution’s representatives and the architects, is to “highlight this commemorative site not only as a battlefield but also as a field of life”.

The Russian Field Museum. Satellite footage
Copyright: © Architecture and Cultural Policy PNKB


The concept for the building, which is planned for construction in the village of Monastyrshchino to mark the 650th anniversary of the Battle of Kulikovo, was developed by the familiar team behind the Kulikovo Battle Museum – PNKB’s Architecture and Cultural Policy Bureau. This project continues their long-standing collaboration with the “reserve” museum, naturally inviting comparisons between the two museum buildings designed 15 years apart.

The Russian Field Museum. View from the highway
Copyright: © Architecture and Cultural Policy PNKB


Like the 2016 building, the new structure appears to grow out of the ground. Visitors will also be able to ascend unobstructed from the field to the roof, where the view from this elevated point will not only allow them to admire the surrounding landscape’s beauty but also grasp the sheer scale of the field.

From this vantage, the visitors might spot the roof of the museum in Mokhovoe, located 5 km to the south, and beyond it, on Red Hill, Shchusev’s church and the 1852 memorial column (designed by Alexander Brullov).

The Russian Field Museum. A facade detail
Copyright: © Architecture and Cultural Policy PNKB


The external appearance of the “Russian Field” is significantly softer than that of the Kulikovo Battle Museum. From most angles, the new museum resembles sun-scorched, wind-bent blades of giant feather grass or an enormous bundle of straw. This “gentle” image, reflecting the more peaceful theme of the new exhibition, is further enhanced by the architects’ choice of façade materials. The building, which is plan-wise reminiscent of a giant snail, is clad in diagonally laid logs forming a hyperbolic surface. This hyperboloid – a smooth form composed of straight lines – is ideally suited to fulfilling the task of harmonizing nature and geometry.

  • zooming
    1 / 3
    The Russian Field Museum. Plan of the basement floor
    Copyright: © Architecture and Cultural Policy PNKB
  • zooming
    2 / 3
    The Russian Field Museum. Plan of the 1st floor
    Copyright: © Architecture and Cultural Policy PNKB
  • zooming
    3 / 3
    The Russian Field Museum. Section view
    Copyright: © Architecture and Cultural Policy PNKB


The spiral – the shape that forms the basis of the floor plan – evokes an obvious set of quite appropriate associations: it is the shell of an ancient mollusk, the spiral of evolution connecting this mollusk with modern forms of life, and the spiral of history linking us with the contemporaries of Dmitry Donskoy...

Perhaps a less obvious association is with a compressor, which creates excessive pressure inside the building. This pressure allows the concentrated Kulikovo natural and historical context to be placed in the halls, gathered evenly like dust with a vacuum cleaner from the entire surface of the field and even partly from its depths.

The Russian Field Museum. View from the highway
Copyright: © Architecture and Cultural Policy PNKB


The Russian Field Museum. The entrance
Copyright: © Architecture and Cultural Policy PNKB


However, the main task of the spiral structure, according to the project’s authors, is to prepare the visitors – who arrive at the “reserve” museum through “less prominent” fields – for the visual and tactile perception of the historically significant natural space. This is why the architects confidently guide the flow of visitors along a strictly defined route, far more imperatively than in the Kulikovo Battle Museum. Visitors entering the building from the access road are first “sucked” into its very center.

The Russian Field Museum. Scheme 1. The entrance
Copyright: © Architecture and Cultural Policy PNKB


“This shift is absolutely necessary” – explains architect Anton Lyubimkin – “So that the person first enters a space that, in some sense, contrasts with the Field”. This space is represented by the well, connecting the first and basement floors, illuminated through a skylight in the roof. Compared to the surrounding expanses, it is tight and, according to the architect’s concept, is meant to “immerse the person into itself”. There, Anton continues, “the field space unfolds in such a way that the visitor to the museum inevitably lifts their head upwards, and at some point, we see the sky, and there occurs an awareness of the inner freedom that exists regardless of physical freedom...”

The Russian Field Museum. Scheme 2. The well
Copyright: © Architecture and Cultural Policy PNKB


After spending some time on the balcony encircling the well at ground level, the “compressor” building first sends the guest downward to the basement and then upward – along the steps of the halls in the expanding coils of the spiral.

The Russian Field Museum. Scheme 3. The visitor′s route
Copyright: © Architecture and Cultural Policy PNKB


The detailed conceptual content of the exhibition is still being developed under the guidance of the renowned designer Anton Fyodorov, but one can already grasp the basic idea of it from the architects’ descriptions: at each stage of the exhibition, the field reveals a new aspect to the visitor, starting from geology and soils, through the diversity of everything that grows and runs across the surface, to the air above the field, and ending with all the birds and butterflies that the field contains.

The Russian Field Museum. Fragment of the exposition space on the first floor
Copyright: © Architecture and Cultural Policy PNKB


As the visitor moves from underground to the sky, the exhibition space expands. On the second, outer coil, part of the exhibition becomes the actual field itself: here, the museum space reaches the external glazed wall, beyond which the field emerges through the slanted palisade of logs.

The Russian Field Museum. Scheme 4. The exit to the field
Copyright: © Architecture and Cultural Policy PNKB


At the end of the journey, the spiral path “throws” the “prepared” visitor outside, with their face to the field, about which they now know much more, and are ready for a conscious immersion into this simultaneously unique and typical Russian landscape.
The Russian Field Museum. Top view
Copyright: © Architecture and Cultural Policy PNKB
The Russian Field Museum. Scheme 4. The exit to the field and acention to the roof, view from the south, from the side of the Kulikovo field
Copyright: © Architecture and Cultural Policy PNKB
The Russian Field Museum. Location plan
Copyright: © Architecture and Cultural Policy PNKB


30 December 2024

Headlines now
​The Power of Lines
The building at the very beginning of New Arbat is the result of long deliberations over how to replace the former House of Communication. Contemporary, dynamic, and even somewhat zoomorphic in character, it is structured around a large diagonal grid. The building has become a striking accent both in the perspective of the former Kalinin Avenue and in the panorama of Arbat Square. Yet, unfortunately, the original concept was not fully realized. In 2020, the Moscow ArchCouncil approved a design featuring an exoskeleton – an external load-bearing structure, which eventually turned into a purely decorative element. Still, the power of the supergraphic “holds” the building, giving it the qualities of a new urban landmark with iconic potential. How this concept took shape, what unexpected associations might underlie the grid’s form, and why the exoskeleton was never built – all this is explored in our article.
Resort on the Kama River
Wowhaus has developed a project for the reconstruction of Korabelnaya Roshcha (“Mast Grove”), a wellness resort located on the banks of the Kama River.
Nests in Primorye
The eco-park project “Nests”, designed by Aleksey Polishchuk and the company Power Technologies, received first prize at the Eco-Coast 2025 festival, organized by the Union of Architects of Russia. For a glamping site in Filinskaya Bay, the authors proposed bird-shaped houses, treehouses, and a nest-shaped observation platform, topping it all with an entrance pavilion executed in the shape of an owl.
The Angle of String Tension
The House of Music, designed by Vladimir Plotkin and the architects of TPO Reserve, resembles a harp, and when seen from above, even a bass clef. But if only it were that simple! The architecture of the complex fuses two distinct expressive languages: the lattice-like, transparent, permeable vocabulary of “classical” modernism and the sculptural, ribbon-like volumes so beloved by today’s neo-modernism. How it all works – where the catharsis lies, which compositional axes underpin the design, where the project resembles Zaryadye Concert Hall and where it does not – read in the article below.
How Historic Tobolsk Becomes a Portal to the Future
Over the past decade, the architectural company Wowhaus has developed urban strategies for several Russian cities – Vyksa, Tula, and Nizhnekamsk, to name but a few. Against this backdrop, the Tobolsk master plan stands out both for its scale – the territory under transformation covers more than 220 square kilometers – and for its complexity.
St. Petersburg vs Rome
The center of St. Petersburg is, as we know, sacred – but few people can say with certainty where this “sacred place” actually begins and ends. It’s not about the formal boundaries, “from the Obvodny Canal to the Bolshaya Nevka”, but about the vibe that feels true to the city center. With the Nevskaya Ratusha complex – built to a design that won an international competition – Evgeny Gerasimov and Sergei Tchoban created an “image of the center” within its territory. And not so much the image of St. Petersburg itself, as that of a global metropolis. This is something new, something that hasn’t appeared in the city for a long time. In this article, we study the atmosphere, recall precedents, and even reflect on who and when first called St. Petersburg the “new Rome”. Clearly, the idea is alive for a reason.
On the Wave
The project of transforming the river port and embankment in the city of Cheboksary, developed by the ATRIUM Architects, involves one of the city’s key areas. The Volga embankment is to be turned into a riverside boulevard – a multifunctional, comfortable, and expressive space for work and leisure activities. The authors propose creating a new link with the city’s main Krasnaya (“Red”) Square, as well as erecting several residential towers inspired by the shape of the traditional national women’s headdress – these towers are likely to become striking accents on the Volga panorama.
Valery Kanyashin: “We Were Given a Free Hand”
The Headliner residential complex, the main part of which was recently completed just across from Moscow City, is a kind of neighbor to the MIBC that doesn’t “play along” with it. On the contrary, the new complex is entirely built on contrast: like a city of differently scaled buildings that seems to have emerged naturally over the past 20 years – which is a hugely popular trend nowadays! And yet here – perhaps only here – such a project has been realized to its full potential. Yes, high-rises dominate, but all these slender, delicate profiles, all these exciting perspectives! And most importantly – how everything is mixed and composed together... We spoke with the project’s leader Valery Kanyashin.
​The Keystone
Until quite recently, premium residential and office complexes in Moscow were seen as the exclusive privilege of the city center. Today the situation is changing: high-quality architecture is moving beyond the confines of the Third Ring Road and appearing on the outskirts. The STONE Kaluzhskaya business center is one such example. Projects like this help decentralize the megalopolis, making life and work prestigious in any part of the city.
Perpetuum Mobile
The interior of the headquarters of Natsproektstroy, created by the IND studio team, vividly and effectively reflects the client’s field of activity – it is one of Russia’s largest infrastructure companies, responsible for logistics and transport communications of every kind you can possibly think of.
Water and Light
Church art is full of symbolism, and part of it is truly canonical, while another part is shaped by tradition and is perceived by some as obligatory. Because of this kind of “false conservatism”, contemporary church architecture develops slowly compared to other genres, and rarely looks contemporary. Nevertheless, there are enthusiasts in this field out there: the cemetery church of Archangel Michael in Apatity, designed by Dmitry Ostroumov and Prokhram bureau, combines tradition and experiment. This is not an experiment for its own sake, however – rather, the considered work of a contemporary architect with the symbolism of space, volume, and, above all, light.
Champions’ Cup
At first glance, the Bell skyscraper on 1st Yamskogo Polya Street, 12, appears strict and laconic – though by no means modest. Its economical stereometry is built on a form close to an oval, one of UNK architects’ favorite themes. The streamlined surface of the main volume, clad in metal louvers, is sliced twice with glass incisions that graphically reveal the essence of the original shape: both its simplicity and its complexity. At the same time, dozens of highly complex engineering puzzles have been solved here.
Semi-Digital Environment
In the town of Innopolis, a satellite of Kazan, the first 4-star hotel designed by MAD Architects has opened. The interiors of the hotel combine elegance with irony, and technology with comfort, evoking the atmosphere of a computer game or maybe a sci-fi movie about the near future.
History never ends
The old railway station in Kapan, a city in southern Armenia, has been given new life by the Paris-based design firm Normal Studio. Today, it serves as a TUMO center.
A Deep, Crystal Shine
A new luxury residential development by ADM architects is set to rise in the Patriarch’s Ponds district, not far from Novopushkinsky Square. It will replace three buildings erected in the early 1990s. The project authors, Andrey Romanov and Ekaterina Kuznetsova, have placed their bets on the variety among the three volumes, modern design solutions, and attention to detail: one of the buildings will feature smoothly curved balconies with a ceramic sheen on their undersides, while another will be accented by glass “sculpture” columns.
Grigory Revzin: “What we should do with the architecture of the seventies”
Soviet modernism came in two flavors: the good, author-driven kind, and the bad, standardized kind. The good kind was “on the periphery”, while the bad kind was in the center – geographically, in terms of attention, scale, and everything else. Can we demolish it? “That would be destroying public consensus out of thin air”. So what should we do? Preserve it, but creatively: “Bring architecture into places where it hasn’t yet appeared”. Treat these buildings not as monuments, but as urban landscape. Read our interview with Grigory Revzin on the pressing topic of saving modernism – where he proposes a controversial, yet really intriguing, way of preserving 1970s buildings.
A Roadside Picnic of Urban Planning Theorists
Marina Egorova, head of Empate Architectural Bureau, brought together urban planning theorists – the successors of Alexey Gutnov and Vyacheslav Glazychev – to revive the substance and depth of professional discourse. At the first meeting, much ground was covered: the participants revisited the theoretical foundations, aligned their values, examined a cutting-edge case of the Kazan agglomeration, and concluded with the unfathomable intricacies of Russian land demarcation. Below, we present key takeaways from all the presentations.
Perspective View
CNTR Architects has designed a business center for a new district in Yekaterinburg, aiming to reduce the need for commuting and make the residential environment more diverse. The architectural solutions are equally focused on creating spatial flexibility, comfortable working conditions, and a memorable image that could allow the building to become a spatial landmark of the district.
Malevich and Bathhouses, Nature and High-Tech
The Malevich Bathhouse complex is scheduled to open in the fall of 2025 on the Rublyovo-Uspenskoye Highway. The project, designed by DBA-GROUP under the leadership of Vladislav Andreev, is an example of an unconventional approach to the image of a spa in general and of a bathhouse in particular. Deliberately avoiding any kind of allusion, the architects opted for streamlined forms with characteristic rounded corners, a combination of wood with bent glass, and restrained contemporary shapes – both inside and out. Let’s take a closer look at the project.
Rather, a Tablecloth and a Glass!
After many years, the long-abandoned Horse Guards Department building in St. Petersburg has finally received the attention it deserves: according to a design by Studio 44, the first restoration and adaptation works are scheduled to begin this year. Both the intended function and the general scope of works imply minimal alteration to the complex, which has preserved traces of its three-century history. All solutions are reversible and aimed, above all, at opening the monument to the city and immersing it in a lively social scene – hence the choice of a cultural center scenario with a strong gastronomic component.
​Materialization of Airflows
The Nikolai Kamov International Airport in Tomsk opened at the end of August last year. We have already written about the project – now we are taking a look at the completed building. Its functionality is reinforced by symbolic undertones: the architects at ASADOV sought to reflect local identity in the architecture as fully as possible.
The City as a Narrative
Sergey Skuratov’s approach to large urban plots could best be described as a “total design code”. The architect pays equal attention to the overall composition and the smallest of details, striving to ensure that every aspect is thoroughly thought out and subordinated to the original vision. It’s a Renaissance-like approach, really – a titanic effort demanding remarkable willpower and perseverance. The results are likewise grand – architecture that makes a statement. This article looks at the revived concept for the central section of the Seventh Heaven residential district in Kazan, a composition so thoroughly considered that even the “gradient of visual emphasis” (sic!) across the facades has been carefully worked out. It also touches on the narrative idea behind the project – and even the architect’s own doubts about it.
A Garden of Hope for Freedom
In October, at the Spaso-Evfimiev Monastery in Suzdal, the Prison Yard Garden opened on the site that had served as a prison from the 18th century until the Khrushchev Thaw. The architectural concept was developed by NOῨD Short Film, and the landscape design by the MOX landscape bureau. In fact, there are two gardens here – very different ones. We try to understand whether they evoke the right emotions in visitors, while also showing the beauty of June’s ruderal plants in bloom.
A Laconic Image of Time
The Time Square residential complex, built on the northern edge of St. Petersburg, appears more concise and efficient than its neighbor and predecessor, the New Time complex. Nevertheless, the architect’s hand is clearly felt: themes of “black and white”, “inside and outside”, and most notably, the “lamellar” quality of the facades that seems to visibly “eat away” at the buildings’ mass – everything is played out like a well-written score. One is reminded of both classical modernism and the so-called “post-constructivism”.
The Flower of the Lake
The prototype for the building of the Kamal Theater in Kazan is an ice flower: a rare and fragile natural phenomenon of Lake Kaban “froze” in the large, soaring outlines of the glass screens enclosing the main volume, shaping its silhouette and shielding the stained-glass windows from the sun. The project, led by the Wowhaus consortium and including global architecture “star” Kengo Kuma, won the 2021/2022 competition and was realized close to the original concept in a short – very short – period of time. The theater opened in early 2025. It was Kengo Kuma who proposed the image of an ice flower and the contraposition of cold on the outside and warmth on the inside. Between 2022 and 2024, Wowhaus did everything possible to bring this vision to life, practically living on-site. Now we are taking a closer look at this landmark building and its captivating story.
Peaceful Integration on Mira Avenue
The MIRA residential complex (the word mir means “peace” in Russian), perched above the steep banks of the Yauza River and Mira Avenue, lives up to its name not only technically, but also visually and conceptually. Sleek, high-rise, and glass-clad, it responds both to Zholtovsky’s classicism and to the modernism of the nearby “House on Stilts”. Drawing on features from its neighbors, it reconciles them within a shared architectural language rooted in contemporary façade design. Let’s take a closer look at how this is done.
An Interior for a New Format of Education
The design of the new building for Tyumen State University (TyumSU) was initially developed before the pandemic but later revised to meet new educational requirements. The university has adopted a “2+2+2” system, which eliminates traditional divisions into groups and academic streams in favor of individualized study programs. These changes were implemented swiftly – right at the start of construction. Now that the building is complete, we are taking a closer look.
Penthouses and Kokoshniks
A new residential complex designed by ASADOV Architects for the Krasnaya Roza business district responds to its proximity to 17th-century landmarks – the chambers of the Hamovny Dvor and St. Nicholas Church – as well as to the need to preserve valuable façades of a historic rental house built in the Russian Revival style. The architects proposed a set of buildings of varying heights, whose façades reference ecclesiastical architecture. But we were also able to detect other associations.
Centipede Town
The new school campus designed by ATRIUM Architects, located on the shores of a protected lake in the Imeretian Lowland Ornithological Reserve, represents an important and ambitious undertaking for the team: this is not just a school, but a Presidential Lyceum for the comprehensive development of gifted children – 2,500 students from age 3 through high school. At the same time, it is also envisioned as a new civic hub for the entire Sirius territory. In this article, we unpack the structure and architecture of this “lyceum town”.