По-русски

Nuanced Alternative

How can you rhyme a square and space? Easily! But to do so, you need to rhyme everything you can possibly think of: weave everything together, like in a tensegrity structure, and find your own optics too. The new exhibition at GES-2 does just that, offering its visitor a new perspective on the history of art spanning 150 years, infused with the hope for endless multiplicity of worlds and art histories. Read on to see how this is achieved and how the exhibition design by Evgeny Ace contributes to it.

24 June 2024
Report
mainImg
The exhibition named “Square and Space: From Malevich to GES-2” which recently opened in the underground space of the “House of Culture” boasts a star-studded lineup. Francesco Bonami, a renowned contemporary art curator, publishes Flash Art magazine. In 2000, he curated the traveling contemporary art exhibition Manifesta in Ljubljana, and in 2003, he curated the 50th Venice Biennale of Contemporary Art, where the manifesto glorified “The Viewer’s Dictatorship”. In 2017, GES-2 published Francesco Bonami’s book “I Can Do That Too!” explaining “why contemporary art is still art”. As for Zelfira Tregulova, she was, until recently, the director of Moscow’s Tretyakov Gallery, into which she had brought a lot of contemporary art as well.

  • zooming
    Zelfira Tregulova at the inauguration of the exhibition "Square and Space. From Malevich to GES-2". 20.06.2024 – 27.10.2024
    Copyright: Photograph © Julia Tarabarina, Archi.ru
  • zooming
    Francesco Bonami at the inauguration of the exhibition "Square and Space. From Malevich to GES-2". 20.06.2024 – 27.10.2024
    Copyright: Photograph © Julia Tarabarina, Archi.ru


Now, Francesco Bonami and Zelfira Tregulova have come together to create an exhibition at GES-2, offering an intriguing angle on contemporary art and its history. As paradoxical as it may seem, contemporary art already has a significant history. It’s interesting to understand how much this history “weighs it down”, given that one of contemporary art’s key elements is novelty, a rejection of the old. How does one navigate this when your rejection of history has itself become a history over 110 years long? You need to respond to this contradiction in one way or another!

The curators respond brilliantly, in my opinion. They use excellent examples from a historical span ranging from the Peredvizhniki and Aivazovsky to an installation by Ilya and Emilia Kabakov, created specifically for the exhibition, to show that alternative histories of contemporary art – just like Max Fry’s alternative worlds – can be endless. By looking at the echoes of the “Black Square” from a slightly different angle, everything changes a bit; and there can be many such angles. The perspectives for creative reimagining of art history are fundamentally open.

This novelty lies specifically in the curators’ approach, and not in Francesco Bonami’s comparison of the “Black Square” to a QR code. This last innovation seems somewhat contrived to me.

The exhibition itself is excellent. The exhibits are of high quality, from good collections, and very diverse. There are even two codices, where the curators found “black squares done before Malevich” (sic!) as a lyrical digression: one from 1880 depicts a “battle of black men in a dark room”, and the other, an even earlier one, shows “darkness before the creation of the world”.

Creation of the world as a black rectangle. Exhibition "Square and Space. From Malevich to GES-2". 20.06.2024 – 27.10.2024
Copyright: Photograph © Julia Tarabarina, Archi.ru


According to the curators, the exhibition begins with the “Black Square” (not the original, but an authentic repetition by Malevich) and ends with a total installation by the Kabakovs. However, if we are to look from the chronological standpoint, the beginning of the exhibition is Aivazovsky’s “Black Sea” from 1881, which pairs Malevich at the entrance, along with several other 19th-century paintings. The ending is not another Kabakov installation but one by Vladimir Seleznyov, dated 2024.

Both the Kabakovs and Seleznyov are a highlight.

The Kabakovs’ installation named “Incident in the Museum, or Water Music” is a series of rooms from a “retrospective” of the entirely fictional artist Stepan Koshelev, a Cezannist/Social Realist, featuring milkmaids, dachas, skis, and a mock catalog signed by none other than Alpatov. The exhibition is convincingly executed, and the paintings are skillfully done “by all the canons of the genre.” However, the installation suggests that “something went wrong,” and on the opening day, the ceiling leaked, leaving the rooms filled with basins catching water from tubes installed under the ceiling, resembling sprinklers, but without nozzles. The main theme is thus the music created by the dripping water, though in reality, it is the embarrassment and awkwardness of the leak that take center stage. At this point, I couldn’t help but recall the opening of the Russian Pavilion at the 2008 Architecture Biennale. Even the walls in the first room are red, and the name Koshelev would ring a bell for anyone interested in contemporary architecture. There is one big “but”, though: the Kabakovs created this installation in 1992, long before any of these events were planned...

  • zooming
    Exhibition "Square and Space. From Malevich to GES-2". 20.06.2024 – 27.10.2024
    Copyright: Photograph © Julia Tarabarina, Archi.ru
  • zooming
    Exhibition "Square and Space. From Malevich to GES-2". 20.06.2024 – 27.10.2024
    Copyright: Photograph © Julia Tarabarina, Archi.ru


Vladimir Seleznyov’s installation is not as immersive as the Kabakovs’, but it can be equally interesting for those with an architectural mindset. It is titled “Metropolis. Traum(a)stadt”; the second word translates from German as “city of dreams” though for Russian and English speakers, it also resonates with the word “trauma”. This play on words is likely intentional, inviting contemplation on whether dreaming is inherently traumatic for the Russian psyche.

For all intents and purposes, this name was not chosen by accident – I could go on and on about whether it’s really traumatic for a Russian individual to dream, but I digress. The essence of the installation, placed in a dark room, is a city constructed from trash. When the lights come on, we see that it is unmistakably trash, but when the lights switch off according to a schedule, the objects marked with phosphorescent paint transform into a cityscape, resembling a somewhat zombified city with a greenish tint. The author’s view on the metropolis and its trashy allure is apparent (he doesn’t think much of a metropolis, to put it bluntly), yet the scene mesmerizes you precisely because this heap of trash strikingly resembles a real city.

  • zooming
    Vladimir Semyonov. "Metropolis. Traum(a)stadt." Installation. 2024. Exhibition "Square and Space. From Malevich to GES-2". 20.06.2024 – 27.10.2024
    Copyright: Photograph © Julia Tarabarina, Archi.ru
  • zooming
    Vladimir Semyonov. "Metropolis. Traum(a)stadt." Installation. 2024. Exhibition "Square and Space. From Malevich to GES-2". 20.06.2024 – 27.10.2024
    Copyright: Photograph © Julia Tarabarina, Archi.ru


  • zooming
    Vladimir Semyonov. "Metropolis. Traum(a)stadt." Installation. 2024. Exhibition "Square and Space. From Malevich to GES-2". 20.06.2024 – 27.10.2024
    Copyright: Photograph © Julia Tarabarina, Archi.ru
  • zooming
    Vladimir Semyonov. "Metropolis. Traum(a)stadt." Installation. 2024. Exhibition "Square and Space. From Malevich to GES-2". 20.06.2024 – 27.10.2024
    Copyright: Photograph © Julia Tarabarina, Archi.ru


  • zooming
    Vladimir Semyonov. "Metropolis. Traum(a)stadt." Installation. 2024. Exhibition "Square and Space. From Malevich to GES-2". 20.06.2024 – 27.10.2024
    Copyright: Photograph © Julia Tarabarina, Archi.ru
  • zooming
    Vladimir Semyonov. "Metropolis. Traum(a)stadt." Installation. 2024. Exhibition "Square and Space. From Malevich to GES-2". 20.06.2024 – 27.10.2024
    Copyright: Photograph © Julia Tarabarina, Archi.ru


The exhibition develops chronologically from the old to the new, with well-known works and authors juxtaposed and even intermixed with those familiar solely to contemporary art specialists. Nonetheless, a determined visitor, who thoroughly explores the exhibition (going preferably a couple of times back and forth), will indeed feel acquainted with an alternative version of the last 150 years of contemporary art history, encompassing all of its key movements: realism, abstraction, optical art, tensegrity structures, photorealism, and total installations. It might even be possible to pass an exam on contemporary art after such a visit, despite the lack of obvious textbook examples –the “Black Square” being the only exception

So, the curators offer us a nuanced alternative history of contemporary art, based on “solid” items (not random by any means!) from good collections, including, of course, the V-A-C collection. They clearly suggest that this “revolution” has neither an end (since contemporary art continues developing) nor a beginning (since it is not so difficult to trace it back to 19th-century realist painting and old Latin codices – when they depict the world before the beginning of time or the battle of the negroes). We haven’t even mentioned the pre-classical alabasters yet... Nevertheless, one of the main emotions the exhibition evokes is this slightly new perspective, fundamentally open, indicating that there can be many angles, and the chronological “loose ends” aim at the absence of rigid boundaries.

All this was helped to be expressed by the architect Evgeny Ace with his exhibition design.

Exhibition "Square and Space. From Malevich to GES-2". 20.06.2024 – 27.10.2024
Copyright: Photograph © Julia Tarabarina, Archi.ru


The fundamental openness of the curatorial statement in the space is visually represented by the plane of a stand visible through the glass separating the exhibition hall from the cloakroom, a kind of red (rather, terracotta!) wedge that suppresses (but not completely!) the otherwise white space of GES-2. This is supported by the fascias, most of which hang on the ends of the stands.

  • zooming
    Exhibition "Square and Space. From Malevich to GES-2". 20.06.2024 – 27.10.2024
    Copyright: Photograph © Julia Tarabarina, Archi.ru
  • zooming
    Exhibition "Square and Space. From Malevich to GES-2". 20.06.2024 – 27.10.2024
    Copyright: Photograph © Julia Tarabarina, Archi.ru


Inside, in the space of the hall, divided by the GES-2 supports into three naves, three other naves of a smaller size are inscribed, made of stands of several muted shades, connected at the top by flat strips – at an angle, like several linear hangings, with one “rope” intersecting above the other, looking very much like a housewife hangs laundry in the yard, although we now mostly see this mise-en-scène in movies.

The lines of the building’s metal supports, duplicated by drainage strips on the floor, run in one direction, while the lines of the stands are at an angle to them. The two structures intersect; two spatial grids overlap each other, as if visibly representing the idea of looking at contemporary art from a slightly different, though not perpendicular, angle.

  • zooming
    Exhibition "Square and Space. From Malevich to GES-2". 20.06.2024 – 27.10.2024
    Copyright: Photograph © Julia Tarabarina, Archi.ru
  • zooming
    Exhibition "Square and Space. From Malevich to GES-2". 20.06.2024 – 27.10.2024
    Copyright: Photograph © Julia Tarabarina, Archi.ru


But then again, the angle at which the lines of the stands are set is not arbitrary. The central promenade starts behind the Black Square, and the square is turned towards the entering person as the key exhibit. Thus, the axis of Malevich’s “Black Square” strings together 20th-century art.

The exhibition booths themselves are subjected to a certain modular width, standing with large gaps between them, so while the lines are marked, one can stroll along and across in various directions, providing a wide choice of sometimes unexpected perspectives. Thus, in the space of GES-2, “streets” and “squares” (sic!) are formed, which Francesco Bonami considers linguistically friendly to the “Black Square”. The layout turned out to be modernist, composed of individual plates, and not just modernist, but “late-modernist” from the 1980s, because the plates are not set at a daring 45° angle and not end-on to the red line, but rather hold their formation, albeit intermittently, like on Moscow’s Sergius Radonezh Street (formerly Tulinskaya until 1992).

  • zooming
    Exhibition "Square and Space. From Malevich to GES-2". 20.06.2024 – 27.10.2024
    Copyright: Photograph © Julia Tarabarina, Archi.ru
  • zooming
    Exhibition "Square and Space. From Malevich to GES-2". 20.06.2024 – 27.10.2024
    Copyright: Photograph © Julia Tarabarina, Archi.ru


The ends of the exhibition booths are not cut straight but slightly protrude, echoing the plaques of the fascias and the very first title “tail” of the exhibition, as if each stand is formed, like a sandwich, from two outer plates and a filler. A similar H-beam contour can be seen in the metal supports of GES-2, and they resonate with each other. I asked Evgeny Ace if this resemblance was intentional – no, he said, the stands have such a contour simply to lighten their construction. However, if it seems that way to the visitor, then so be it, reassured the author of the exhibition design. Well, I’ve got nothing against it either.

Nevertheless, the booths indeed look like overblown pillars, very akin to the original interior, as if a modified DNA had been grafted onto them, causing them to develop in a similar but slightly different way. A rather curious effect!

By the way, more about the city! Besides having a “city within a city” – that same “Metropolis” like a large model at an architectural exhibition, and a “show within a show” (the total installation by the Kabakovs), there is also a “little house inside GES-2” which seems to be becoming a tradition in this day and age.

Here, the little house is of approximately the same size: the exhibition includes an authorial repetition of the “Shed” designed by Meganon Architects. As the tour guide told us, in Nikola-Lenivets – where it was built in 2006 – this house was more of a lantern, while here it serves more to cast shadows in its interior, similar to the classic “shadow gaps”, so much loved by Renzo Piano.

  • zooming
    Exhibition "Square and Space. From Malevich to GES-2". 20.06.2024 – 27.10.2024
    Copyright: Photograph © Julia Tarabarina, Archi.ru
  • zooming
    Exhibition "Square and Space. From Malevich to GES-2". 20.06.2024 – 27.10.2024
    Copyright: Photograph © Julia Tarabarina, Archi.ru


  • zooming
    Exhibition "Square and Space. From Malevich to GES-2". 20.06.2024 – 27.10.2024
    Copyright: Photograph © Julia Tarabarina, Archi.ru
  • zooming
    Exhibition "Square and Space. From Malevich to GES-2". 20.06.2024 – 27.10.2024
    Copyright: Photograph © Julia Tarabarina, Archi.ru


I asked Evgeny Ace if he was the initiator of the authorial reproduction of the long-lost Shed – again, he said no. But it’s gratifying to see the object as an old acquaintance.

The free yet confidently directed construction of “streets” and “squares” in the exhibition is echoed by its internal orchestration. There are many narratives and even more shapes here, resonating with each other, creating dialogues, rhythmically paired, and sometimes even more complex. For example, at the beginning of the exhibition, we see several landscapes divided by the horizon into two halves, close to two strips of abstraction. One of them is Aivazovsky’s “Black Sea”, sky and water, a pair to the “Black Square” by name and minimal figuration, because the chaos of waves, so well captured by Aivazovsky, is minimally figurative. It should be noted that on the same exhibition booth “behind” Aivazovsky, there are two more landscapes divided similarly; the curators subtly play on the edge of abstraction and reality in 19th-century art, but what’s really interesting is that the same line (and this is visible from the entrance), further includes the work of Erik Bulatov, a lover of “Horizons” – the painting “Black Evening / White Snow” luxuriously interpreting both the perspective and the monochrome of the “Black Square” and the non-objective division into sky and earth. This is something that we can understand as “the separation of heaven from earth” or “darkness from light” as in the mentioned book of the Old Testament.

Exhibition "Square and Space. From Malevich to GES-2". 20.06.2024 – 27.10.2024
Copyright: Photograph © Julia Tarabarina, Archi.ru


You enter, see this not-so-simple but obvious rhyme, and understand that there will be plenty of such things here. Just as the space is tied together by rows of showcases and lines of free passages, so do the exhibits resonate with each other, forming many threads, sometimes in subtle, and sometimes the most obvious way.

Take, for instance, the shadows from the kinetic objects of Kolaichuk and Francisco Infante on the floor next to the horizontal plane projection of the Qubbat as-Sakhrah shrine, which one cannot step on (marked by a pair of black strips). Nearby, there is another shrine, paper sacred vestments; and so on. Here, if you wander, look, and think, you can find a lot for yourself, much of it seemingly accidental, but not so accidental.

Exhibition "Square and Space. From Malevich to GES-2". 20.06.2024 – 27.10.2024
Copyright: Photograph © Julia Tarabarina, Archi.ru


  • zooming
    Exhibition "Square and Space. From Malevich to GES-2". 20.06.2024 – 27.10.2024
    Copyright: Photograph © Julia Tarabarina, Archi.ru
  • zooming
    Exhibition "Square and Space. From Malevich to GES-2". 20.06.2024 – 27.10.2024
    Copyright: Photograph © Julia Tarabarina, Archi.ru


Perhaps the high level of orchestration combined with a high level of freedom – both in space and selection – is what makes the exhibition truly magnificent; the selection of items is also important, but it is naturally expected from a good curator, while making them string together, making them “have a conversation” in space, sometimes even facing away from each other – that is something of great value.


24 June 2024

Headlines now
Living in the Architecture of One’s Own Making
Do architects design houses for themselves? You bet! In this article, we are examining a new book by TATLIN publishing house. This book – unprecedented for Russia – features 52 private homes designed and built by contemporary architects for themselves. It includes houses that are famous, even iconic, as well as lesser-known ones; large and small, stylish and eccentric. To some extent, the book reflects the history of Russian architecture over the past 30 years.
A City Block Isoline
Another competition project for a residential complex on the banks of the Volga in Nizhny Novgorod has been prepared by Studio 44. A team of architects led by Ivan Kozhin concluded that using a regular block layout in such a location would be inappropriate and developed a “custom design” approach: a chain of parceled multi-section buildings stretching along the entire embankment. Let’s explore the features and advantages of this unconventional method.
Competition: The Price of Creativity?
Any day now, we’re expecting the results of a competition held by the “Samolet” development group for a plot in Kommunarka. In the meantime, we share the impressions of Editor-in-Chief Julia Tarabarina, who managed to conduct a public talk. Though technically focused on the interaction between developers and architects, the public talk turned into a discussion about the pros and cons of architectural competitions.
Terraced Design
The “River Park” residential complex has confidently and securely shaped the Nagatinsky Backwater shoreline. Featuring a public embankment, elevated courtyards connected by pedestrian bridges, and brick façades, the development invites exploration of its nuanced response to the surrounding context, as well as hints of the architects’ megalithic design thinking.
A Kremlin’s Core and Meteorite Fragments
We continue our coverage of the competition projects for the residential district that the development company GloraX plans to build along the embankment of the Rowing Channel in Nizhny Novgorod. ASADOV Architects approached the concept through a deep dive into local identity, using storytelling to pinpoint a central idea for the design: the master plan and composition are imagined as if a meteorite had struck a “proto-Kremlin”. Sounds weird? Find more details below!
The Volga Regatta
GloraX plans to develop a residential complex spanning 14 hectares along the Volga River in Nizhny Novgorod. The winning design in a closed-door competition, created by GORA Architects, features housing typologies ranging from townhouses to terraced high-rise slabs, a balance of functions, diverse ways of engaging with the water, and even a dedicated island (no less!) for the city residents.
A New Track
We took a thorough look at D_Station, a railcar repair depot dating back to 1906, recently reconstructed while preserving its century-old industrial structure, upon the project by Sergey Trukhanov and T+T Architects. Though work on the interiors – set to house restaurants and public spaces – is still underway, the building’s exterior already offers plenty to see. Visitors can explore the blend of old and new brickwork, appreciate the architect’s unique interpretation of ruin aesthetics, and enjoy the newly built pedestrian route that connects the Citydel Business Center’s arches to Kazakova Street.
Four Different Surveys
The “Explore the City” competition, organized this year by the Genplan Institute of Moscow, stands out as a pretty unconventional one for the architectural field but aligns perfectly well with the character of urban planning work. The winning project analyzed contemporary residential complexes, combining urban planning insights with a realtor’s perspective to propose a hybrid approach. Other entries explored public centers, motivations for car ownership, and housing vacancy rates. A fifth participant withdrew. Here’s a closer look at the four completed works.
Scheduled Evolution
ASADOV Architects unveiled the EvyCenter pavilion, a microcultural hub for fostering personal growth, organizing workshops, and doing gymnastics. Additionally, this pavilion serves as a prototype for a scalable country house, drawing inspiration from the “Loskutok” project, and constructed from CLT panels in a factory. This marks the beginning of a developer project initiated by the architectural firm (sic!), which is seeking partners to expand both small Evy settlements and even larger Evy cities, which are, according to Andrey Asadov, aimed at fostering the “evolutionary” development of the people who will inhabit them.
The Golden Crown
The concept for a dental clinic in Yekaterinburg, developed by CNTR Studio, revolves around the idea of a “mouth full of gold”: pristine white porcelain stoneware walls are complemented by matte brass details. To avoid an overly literal interpretation, the architects focused on the building’s proportions, skillfully navigating between sunlight requirements and fire safety regulations.
Flexibility and Integration
Not long ago, we covered the project for the fourth phase of the ÁLIA residential complex, designed by APEX. Now, we’ve been shown different fence concepts they developed to enclose the complex’s private courtyards, incorporating a variety of public functions. We believe that the sheer fact that the complex’s architects were involved in such a detail as fencing speaks volumes.
A Step Forward
The HIDE residential complex represents a major milestone for ADM architects and their leaders Andrey Romanov and Ekaterina Kuznetsova in their quest for a fresh high-rise aesthetic – one that is flexible and layered, capable of bringing vibrancy to mass and silhouette while shaping form. Over recent years, this approach has become ADM’s “signature style”, with the golden HIDE tower playing a pivotal role in its evolution. Here, we delve into the project’s story, explore the details of the complex’s design, and uncover its core essence.
Gold in the Sands
A new office for a transcontinental company specializing in resource extraction and processing has opened in Dubai. Designed by T+T Architects, masters of creating spaces that are contemporary, diverse, flexible, and original, this project exemplifies their expertise. On the executive floor, a massive brass-clad partition dominates, while layered textures of compressed earth create a contextually resonant backdrop.
Layers and Levels of Flight
This project goes way back – Reserve Union won this architectural competition at the end of 2011, and the building was completed in 2018, so it’s practically “archival”. However, despite being relatively unknown, the building can hardly be considered “dated” and remains a prime example of architectural expression, particularly in the headquarters genre. And it’s especially fitting for an aviation company office. In some ways, it resembles the Aeroflot headquarters at Sheremetyevo but with its own unique identity, following the signature style of Vladimir Plotkin. In this article, we take an in-depth look at the United Aircraft Corporation (UAC) headquarters in the Moscow agglomeration town of Zhukovsky, supplemented by recent photographs from Alexey Naroditsky – a shoot that became only recently possible due to the fact that improvements were finally made in the surrounding area.
Light and Shadow
In this article, we delve into the architectural design of the “Chaika” house by DNK ag architects, which was recently completed in 2023 as part of the collection of signature designs at ZILArt. As is well-known, all the buildings in this complex follow a design code, yet each one is distinct. This particular building stands out not only for its whiteness and minimalism but also for the refined use of a limited number of techniques that, together, create what can confidently be called synergy.
Casus Novae
A master plan was developed for a large residential area with a name of “DNS City”, but now that its implementation began, the plan has been arbitrarily reformatted and replaced with something that, while similar on the surface, is actually quite different. This is not the first time such a thing happens, but it’s always frustrating. With permission from the author, we are sharing Maria Elkina’s post.
Treasure Hunting
The GAFA bureau, in collaboration with Tegola and Arkhitail, organized an expedition to the island of Kilpola in Karelia as part of Moskomarkhitektura’s “Open City” festival. There, amidst moss and rocks, the students sought answers to questions like: what is the sacred, where does it dwell, and what sustains it? Assisting the participants in this quest were landscape engineer Evgeny Levin, artist Nicholas Roerich, a moose, and the lack of cellular connection. Here’s how the story unfolded.
Depths of the Earth, Streams of Water
In the Malaya Okhta district, the Akzent building, designed by Stepan Liphart, was constructed. It follows a classic tripartite structure, yet it’s what you might call “hand-drawn”: each façade is unique in its form and details, some of which aren’t immediately noticeable. In this article, we explore the context and, together with the architect, delve into how the form was developed.
Fir Tree Dynamics
The “Airports of Region” holding is planning to build an airport in Karachay-Cherkessia, aiming to make the Arkhyz and Dombay resorts more accessible to travelers. The project that won in an invitation-only competition, submitted by Sergey Nikeshkin’s KPLN, blends natural imagery inspired by the shape of a conifer seed, open-air waiting spaces, majestic large trees, and a green roof elevated on needle-like columns. The result is both nature-inspired and WOW.
​A Brick Shell
In the process of designing a clubhouse situated among pine trees in a prestigious suburban area near Moscow, the architectural firm “A.Len” did the façade design part. The combination of different types of brick and masonry correlates with the volumetric and plastique solutions, further enhanced by the inclusion of wood-painted fragments and metal “glazing”.
Word Forms
ATRIUM architects love ambitious challenges, and for the firm’s thirtieth anniversary, they boldly play a game of words with an exhibition that dives deep into a self-created vocabulary. They immerse their projects – especially art installations – into this glossary, as if plunging into a current of their own. You feel as if you’re flowing through the veins of pure art, immersed in a universe of vertical cities, educational spaces – of which the architects are true masters – and the cultural codes of various locations. But what truly captivates is the bold statement that Vera Butko and Anton Nadtochy make, both through their work and this exhibition: architecture, above all, is art – the art of working with form and space.
Flexibility and Acuteness of Modernity
Luxurious, fluid, large “kokoshniks” and spiral barrel columns, as if made from colorful chewing gum: there seem to be no other mansion like this in Moscow, designed in the “Neo-Russian-Modern” style. And the “Teremok” on Malaya Kaluzhskaya, previously somewhat obscure, has “come alive with new colors” and gained visibility after its restoration for the office of the “architectural ecosystem” as the architects love to call themselves. It’s evident that Julius Borisov and the architects at UNK put their hearts into finding this new office and bringing it up to date. Let’s delve into the paradoxes of this mansion’s history and its plasticity. Spoiler: two versions of modernity meet here, both balancing on the razor’s edge of “what’s current”.
Yuri Vissarionov: “A modular house does not belong to the land”
It belongs to space, or to the air... It turns out that 3D printing is more effective when combined with a modular approach: the house is built in a workshop and then adapted to the site, including on uneven terrain. Yuri Vissarionov shares his latest experience in designing tourist complexes, both in central Russia and in the south. These include houseboats, homes printed from lightweight concrete using a 3D printer, and, of course, frame houses.
​Moscow’s First
“The quality of education largely depends on the quality of the educational environment”. This principle of the last decade has been realized by Sergey Skuratov in the project for the First Moscow Gymnasium on Rostovskaya Embankment in the Khamovniki district. The building seamlessly integrates into the complex urban landscape, responding both to the pedestrian flow of the city and the quiet alleyways. It skillfully takes advantage of the height differences and aligns with modern trends in educational space design. Let’s take a closer look.
Looking at the Water
The site of Villa Sonata stretches from the road to the water’s edge, offering its own shoreline, pier, and a picturesque river panorama. To reveal these sweeping views, Roman Leonidov “cut” the façade diagonally parallel to the river, thus getting two main axes for the house and, consequently, “two heads”. The internal core – two double-height spaces, a living room and a conservatory, with a “bridge” above them – makes the house both “transparent” and filled with light.
The White Wing
Well, it’s not exactly white. It’s more of a beige, white-stone structure that plays with the color of limestone – smoother surfaces are lighter, while rougher ones are darker. This wing unites various elements: it absorbs and interprets the surrounding themes. It responds to everything, yet maintains a cohesive expression – a challenging task! – while also incorporating recognizable features of its own, such as the dynamic cuts at the bottom, top, and middle.
Urban Dunes
The XSA Ramps team designed and built a three-part sports hub for a park in Rostov-on-Don, welcoming people of all ages and fitness levels. The skate plaza, pump track, and playground are all meticulously crafted with details that attract a diverse range of visitors. The technical execution of the shapes and slopes transforms this space into a kind of sculptural composition.
Proportional Growth
The project for the fourth phase of the ÁLIA residential area has been announced. The buildings are situated on an elongated plot – almost a “ray” that shoots out from the center of the area towards the river. Their layout reflects both a response to Moscow’s architectural preferences over the past 15 years, shifting “from blocks to towers”, and an interpretation of the neighboring business park designed by SOM. Additionally, the best apartments here are not located at the very top but closer to the middle, forming a glowing “waistline”.
The “Staircase” Building
In designing the “Details” residential complex in New Moscow, Rais Baishev spiced up the now-popular Moscow theme of a “courtyard” building with an idea drawn from the surrealist drawings by Maurits Escher. He envisioned the stepped silhouettes and descending slopes as a metaphysical mega-staircase, creating a key void within the courtyard that gave the project an internal “spine”. This concept is felt both in the building’s silhouette and on its façades.
Projection of the Quarter
No one doubted that the building that Vladimir Plotkin designed as part of the “Garden Quarters” would be the most modernist of all. And it turned out just that way: while adhering to the common design code, the building successfully combines brick and white stone, rhythmically responding to the neighboring building designed by Ostozhenka, yet tactfully and persistently making a few statements of its own. This includes the projection of the ideal urban development composition “14–9–6”, which can be found right next door, mathematical calculations, including those for various types of terraces (and perhaps the only reminder of the Soviet past of the Kauchuk rubber factory!), and the white “cross-stitch” pattern of the façade grid.