Alexandra Kuzmina: “Working is easy when the rules are the same for everyone”

The subject matter of Moscow Region’s booth and presentations at Zodchestvo Festival was the concept of “Integrated Land Development”, and for a good reason: this task is very challenging, very relevant, and Moscow Region has already accumulated quite a formidable experience in this regard. In this article, we are speaking to the main architect of the region: about master plans and who makes them, about where you obtain resources for creating a comfortable environment, about her favorite projects, about why there are so few good architects, and what we should do with the bad ones.

Interviewed by:
Julia Tarabarina
Translated by:
Anton Mizonov

27 November 2023

Interview

Archi.ru
What are the mechanisms that the Moscow Region uses for managing Integrated Land Development projects?

zooming — Alexandra Kuzmina, Chief Architect of the Moscow Region. Mosoblarchitecture at Zodchestvo 2023

Copyright: Photo: provided by the Union of Architects of Russia

Alexandra Kuzmina,
Chief Architect of the Moscow Region:
At the end of 2020, Federal Law No. 494-FZ on amendments to the Urban Planning Code of the Russian Federation was adopted. The law introduced the concept of Integrated Land Development into the Code, as well as a new mechanism for the implementation of investment projects, which, among other things, involves the resettlement of people living in dilapidated and hazardous buildings. In this regard, we have made appropriate changes to the regional standards of urban planning design and developed a number of normative legal acts, including the law of the Moscow Region No. 2/2021-OZ “On some issues of Integrated Land Development of municipalities of the Moscow Region ...” and the Decree of the Government of the Moscow Region No. 29/3 “On approval of the Regulations on the procedure for Integrated Land Development of in the Moscow Region regions”, which further defines the procedure for the implementation of the Integrated Land Development. The decision on implementing the Integrated Land Development in the Moscow Region is assigned to local governments, and the regional government remains the controlling body. Quality standards for housing construction have also been developed, as well as a set of rules guaranteeing a high level of design and construction of housing in the region.

In 2021, the Fund for Assistance to the Integrated Land Development of the Moscow region was also established, in 2022 – the Integrated Land Development project office, which employs a whole group of experts from different governmental agencies, which allows for an integrated approach to project development.

In how many districts of the Moscow Region has the Integrated Land Development program been implemented?

At the moment, 85 projects are at various stages; 11 contracts have already been concluded. Almost a third are located in previously uninhabited, empty and former industrial territories, and the regional Fund for the Promotion of Integrated Land Development is specifically engaged in them.

At the same time, we allot only abandoned and vacant territories for complex residential development.

Where are the Integrated Land Development projects more numerous – closer to the Moscow Ring Road or closer to the borders of the region?

Of course, the first belt near the Moscow Ring Road is more attractive for investors. This is where the region’s first Integrated Land Development project is situated, which was awarded the first prize at the architectural competition “Best Moscow Region Project” in the nomination “Best Multistory Housing Property”, and which was awarded the Silver Sign at Zodchestvo 2022 – this is the housing complex “Dolina Yauzy” (“Yauza Valley”). The situation is more difficult, of course, with the second and third belts – the return on investment is obviously lower, and it’s harder to start an auction.

There is a rare lucky case of Naro-Fominsk. People spent years working on returning the historical memory to the place; and they implemented the concept of redeveloping the historical part of the former silk factory and gracefully integrating the historical buildings into the modern public space with a multifunctional environment and a pedestrian area. The architectural company DNK ag developed an interesting housing project that became the continuation of the red-brick factory ensemble. The place changed for the better so much that we and the architects texted each other: hey, maybe we all should move to Naro-Fominsk? And they go: yeah, probably, a good idea! This small town has everything that Moscow has to offer, save for the University. If it did have a branch of the University, then it would really have it all: the young people could study there, and then the elderly could teach. You are very lucky when conscious people, real professionals, and I am talking about both the developer and the architects, start working together on the same territory.

How do you achieve diversity of development, and, at the same time, its homogeneous character? Where do you take the resources for development?

We don’t work with a land site – we always work with a territory. In resolution 29/3, which I mentioned above, we stipulated the requirements for a comfortable environment. These are additional encumbrances beyond the regional town planning regulations. If they did not exist, each site would yield more output of “useful” areas that actually sell.

So, do I get it right that this comes at the developer’s expense?

The requirements depend on the size of the territory. A small site, let’s say, under 5 hectares, will lose no more than 2% – mainly this will be bicycle trails running along its perimeter. For the larger territories, like 10 hectares and more, you need to provide a whole complex of arrangements aimed at creating a comfortable environment – up to 20% of the area may be occupied by parks, boulevards, minor architectural forms, retail, and entertainment. And these requirements, they are not just an encumbrance – they are also factors that increase the property’s attractiveness – a forward-looking developer always understands that.

We try to reserve possibilities for developing a comfortable environment at the very start of putting together the master plan. Of course, there are territories situated next to the forest or water, where you are lucky to have an opportunity for making a park or a riverside boulevard outside the boundaries that you have, and we use this as well, thus creating new improved spaces, but this is rather an exception than a rule – such land sites are few and far between.

We also strive for public spaces to be thematic and connected to the history of the area, so that the memory does not fade away with new development: unlike Moscow, the renovation of the Moscow region is funded by extra-budgetary sources, and the population growth in the locations is quite significant.

If I were to ask you how the renovation of the Moscow region differs from renovation in other regions and in Moscow, how would you formulate it?

We differ in that our project goes through several stages of urban planning analysis and development before construction begins. First, we do not follow the path of dense point development, even if space is limited. An example is Microdistrict 20 in Mytishchi: you see a small plot, seemingly filled with residential buildings – but in fact, this is not the case. Beyond the territory, we find opportunities for expanding social infrastructure, making additions to schools, and so on.

The second point is that in the Moscow region, we introduced the concept of a master plan. This document represents a meticulously developed architectural and urban planning concept that, at the stage before signing the agreement on Integrated Land Development, establishes all the key parameters of future development, from technical and economic indicators to the plan for the future use of the territory.

Most regions operate through land-use planning documentation, but this is already the next stage after the master plan, which we develop at the start. We have made master plans mandatory at the legislative level, and some regions have already followed our example.

The master plan, which forms the basis for the project, on the one hand, guarantees the quality of life for residents during the implementation of new comprehensive development, and on the other hand, minimizes the risks for developers and the region because it allows for cost assessment at an early stage.

Just for my information, is the master plan in the Moscow region legislatively established? How, where, and by whom is its development managed?

It is enshrined in the law “On the General Plan for the Development of the Moscow Region”. We have outlined an implementation mechanism, such as comprehensive territorial development, based on federal estimates, assessing it as a specific percentage of the layout and demarcation project. We assigned the authority for overseeing its development to the Committee on Architecture and Urban Planning of the Moscow Region.

We have excellent subordinate institutions: Mosoblgazotrest, responsible for data collection, and the Institute of Urban Planning of the Moscow Region. True professionals work there, and thanks to their expertise, we can jointly provide an initial assessment of the territory – typically, they are the ones working on the master plans. However, if the municipality decides to involve another designer, we will support their work in the same way. Working is easy when the rules are the same for everyone.

A pressing question for our audience – how do architects become part of the Integrated Land Development program? Who selects the authors: your department, the client, or does the client consult with you?

A pretty strange question!

When we talk about the decision made by the client regarding the architect they will work with, I must admit that I have no mechanism of influence. The market is the market. From an ethical standpoint, I do not have the right to recommend anyone – not only by law but also morally, as it would be unfair competition. Unfortunately, sometimes, not architects but designers win some competitions, and then a lot of work is needed to bring their projects up to our standards through recommendations from experts in our Working Group of the Architectural Commission and the staff of the Committee on Architecture and Urban Planning. We try to help everyone and never make exceptions for anyone, whether they are a good or a less experienced architect.

Unfortunately, there are now many poor architects out there. I state this with regret, and I believe the problem lies deep, perhaps linked to the disappearance of specialization and the shift to academic mobility, which gives us excellent “technician” architects. However, upon graduation from the master’s program, many are, for the most part, undereducated. Fortunately, there are good design firms with strong traditions, where the elevation of qualifications occurs through mutual exchange, essentially through mentorship. Much, of course, depends on the individual.

Our standards are written the way they are due to the fact that the average quality of design here is very low. The slogan of our standards is “better is allowed, worse is not”. We have described, through text, the minimum set of quality requirements.

Certainly, the process is inert. We plan now, and we will be able to evaluate the results, as the Zodchestvo slogan goes, “tomorrow”. Or even the day after tomorrow. Currently, we hypothesize that our measures and standards will be sufficient to achieve the necessary quality of development, regardless of the quality of the designer.

27 November 2023

Headlines now

Object

Gold in the Sands

A new office for a transcontinental company specializing in resource extraction and processing has opened in Dubai. Designed by T+T Architects, masters of creating spaces that are contemporary, diverse, flexible, and original, this project exemplifies their expertise. On the executive floor, a massive brass-clad partition dominates, while layered textures of compressed earth create a contextually resonant backdrop.

Object

Layers and Levels of Flight

This project goes way back – Reserve Union won this architectural competition at the end of 2011, and the building was completed in 2018, so it’s practically “archival”. However, despite being relatively unknown, the building can hardly be considered “dated” and remains a prime example of architectural expression, particularly in the headquarters genre. And it’s especially fitting for an aviation company office. In some ways, it resembles the Aeroflot headquarters at Sheremetyevo but with its own unique identity, following the signature style of Vladimir Plotkin. In this article, we take an in-depth look at the United Aircraft Corporation (UAC) headquarters in the Moscow agglomeration town of Zhukovsky, supplemented by recent photographs from Alexey Naroditsky – a shoot that became only recently possible due to the fact that improvements were finally made in the surrounding area.

Object

Light and Shadow

In this article, we delve into the architectural design of the “Chaika” house by DNK ag architects, which was recently completed in 2023 as part of the collection of signature designs at ZILArt. As is well-known, all the buildings in this complex follow a design code, yet each one is distinct. This particular building stands out not only for its whiteness and minimalism but also for the refined use of a limited number of techniques that, together, create what can confidently be called synergy.

View

Casus Novae

A master plan was developed for a large residential area with a name of “DNS City”, but now that its implementation began, the plan has been arbitrarily reformatted and replaced with something that, while similar on the surface, is actually quite different. This is not the first time such a thing happens, but it’s always frustrating. With permission from the author, we are sharing Maria Elkina’s post.

Report

Treasure Hunting

The GAFA bureau, in collaboration with Tegola and Arkhitail, organized an expedition to the island of Kilpola in Karelia as part of Moskomarkhitektura’s “Open City” festival. There, amidst moss and rocks, the students sought answers to questions like: what is the sacred, where does it dwell, and what sustains it? Assisting the participants in this quest were landscape engineer Evgeny Levin, artist Nicholas Roerich, a moose, and the lack of cellular connection. Here’s how the story unfolded.

Object

Depths of the Earth, Streams of Water

In the Malaya Okhta district, the Akzent building, designed by Stepan Liphart, was constructed. It follows a classic tripartite structure, yet it’s what you might call “hand-drawn”: each façade is unique in its form and details, some of which aren’t immediately noticeable. In this article, we explore the context and, together with the architect, delve into how the form was developed.

Object

Fir Tree Dynamics

The “Airports of Region” holding is planning to build an airport in Karachay-Cherkessia, aiming to make the Arkhyz and Dombay resorts more accessible to travelers. The project that won in an invitation-only competition, submitted by Sergey Nikeshkin’s KPLN, blends natural imagery inspired by the shape of a conifer seed, open-air waiting spaces, majestic large trees, and a green roof elevated on needle-like columns. The result is both nature-inspired and WOW.

Object

A Brick Shell

In the process of designing a clubhouse situated among pine trees in a prestigious suburban area near Moscow, the architectural firm “A.Len” did the façade design part. The combination of different types of brick and masonry correlates with the volumetric and plastique solutions, further enhanced by the inclusion of wood-painted fragments and metal “glazing”.

Report

Word Forms

ATRIUM architects love ambitious challenges, and for the firm’s thirtieth anniversary, they boldly play a game of words with an exhibition that dives deep into a self-created vocabulary. They immerse their projects – especially art installations – into this glossary, as if plunging into a current of their own. You feel as if you’re flowing through the veins of pure art, immersed in a universe of vertical cities, educational spaces – of which the architects are true masters – and the cultural codes of various locations. But what truly captivates is the bold statement that Vera Butko and Anton Nadtochy make, both through their work and this exhibition: architecture, above all, is art – the art of working with form and space.

Object

Flexibility and Acuteness of Modernity

Luxurious, fluid, large “kokoshniks” and spiral barrel columns, as if made from colorful chewing gum: there seem to be no other mansion like this in Moscow, designed in the “Neo-Russian-Modern” style. And the “Teremok” on Malaya Kaluzhskaya, previously somewhat obscure, has “come alive with new colors” and gained visibility after its restoration for the office of the “architectural ecosystem” as the architects love to call themselves. It’s evident that Julius Borisov and the architects at UNK put their hearts into finding this new office and bringing it up to date. Let’s delve into the paradoxes of this mansion’s history and its plasticity. Spoiler: two versions of modernity meet here, both balancing on the razor’s edge of “what’s current”.

Interview

Yuri Vissarionov: “A modular house does not belong to the land”

It belongs to space, or to the air... It turns out that 3D printing is more effective when combined with a modular approach: the house is built in a workshop and then adapted to the site, including on uneven terrain. Yuri Vissarionov shares his latest experience in designing tourist complexes, both in central Russia and in the south. These include houseboats, homes printed from lightweight concrete using a 3D printer, and, of course, frame houses.

Object

Moscow’s First

“The quality of education largely depends on the quality of the educational environment”. This principle of the last decade has been realized by Sergey Skuratov in the project for the First Moscow Gymnasium on Rostovskaya Embankment in the Khamovniki district. The building seamlessly integrates into the complex urban landscape, responding both to the pedestrian flow of the city and the quiet alleyways. It skillfully takes advantage of the height differences and aligns with modern trends in educational space design. Let’s take a closer look.

Object

Looking at the Water

The site of Villa Sonata stretches from the road to the water’s edge, offering its own shoreline, pier, and a picturesque river panorama. To reveal these sweeping views, Roman Leonidov “cut” the façade diagonally parallel to the river, thus getting two main axes for the house and, consequently, “two heads”. The internal core – two double-height spaces, a living room and a conservatory, with a “bridge” above them – makes the house both “transparent” and filled with light.

Object

The White Wing

Well, it’s not exactly white. It’s more of a beige, white-stone structure that plays with the color of limestone – smoother surfaces are lighter, while rougher ones are darker. This wing unites various elements: it absorbs and interprets the surrounding themes. It responds to everything, yet maintains a cohesive expression – a challenging task! – while also incorporating recognizable features of its own, such as the dynamic cuts at the bottom, top, and middle.

Object

Urban Dunes

The XSA Ramps team designed and built a three-part sports hub for a park in Rostov-on-Don, welcoming people of all ages and fitness levels. The skate plaza, pump track, and playground are all meticulously crafted with details that attract a diverse range of visitors. The technical execution of the shapes and slopes transforms this space into a kind of sculptural composition.

Object

Proportional Growth

The project for the fourth phase of the ÁLIA residential area has been announced. The buildings are situated on an elongated plot – almost a “ray” that shoots out from the center of the area towards the river. Their layout reflects both a response to Moscow’s architectural preferences over the past 15 years, shifting “from blocks to towers”, and an interpretation of the neighboring business park designed by SOM. Additionally, the best apartments here are not located at the very top but closer to the middle, forming a glowing “waistline”.

Object

The “Staircase” Building

In designing the “Details” residential complex in New Moscow, Rais Baishev spiced up the now-popular Moscow theme of a “courtyard” building with an idea drawn from the surrealist drawings by Maurits Escher. He envisioned the stepped silhouettes and descending slopes as a metaphysical mega-staircase, creating a key void within the courtyard that gave the project an internal “spine”. This concept is felt both in the building’s silhouette and on its façades.

Object

Projection of the Quarter

No one doubted that the building that Vladimir Plotkin designed as part of the “Garden Quarters” would be the most modernist of all. And it turned out just that way: while adhering to the common design code, the building successfully combines brick and white stone, rhythmically responding to the neighboring building designed by Ostozhenka, yet tactfully and persistently making a few statements of its own. This includes the projection of the ideal urban development composition “14–9–6”, which can be found right next door, mathematical calculations, including those for various types of terraces (and perhaps the only reminder of the Soviet past of the Kauchuk rubber factory!), and the white “cross-stitch” pattern of the façade grid.

Object

Domus Aurea

In this issue, we examine the “Tessinsky-1” house, designed by Sergey Skuratov and completed in 2023. Located in the middle of the Serebryanicheskaya Embankment district, at the intersection of its main streets, this house assumes a sort of “nodal” role: it not only responds to everything around it and preserves many memories of the former EMA factory within itself, but it weaves all this into a newly directed pattern, reconciling bright “gold” and dark-colored brick, largely with the help of the new, modern-yet-archaic Columba brick, which, come to think about it, is the most precious element here.

send.project

The Chimney of Nikola-Lenivets

In this issue, we are examining the “Obelisk House” designed by KATARSIS and built for the Arkhstoyanie 2023 festival. However, it was only finished later on, and this is why we are examining it now. It seems to us that after the “Obelisk House” appeared in Nikola-Lenivets, a dialogue and a few inner connections appeared between the temporary structures built here. These houses no longer look like “accidental neighbors”, more of which below.

Periscope by the Bay

The jury awarded the second place in the competition for a public and cultural center in Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky to the companies GORA (“Mountain”) and M4. In the consortium’s proposal, the building resembles a sperm whale with a calf swimming next to it or a periscope, whose lenses capture the most spectacular views from the surrounding landscape.

Contest Results

From Arcs to Dolmens

While working on the competition project for Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky, ASADOV Architects prioritized the value of the natural and urban environment, aiming to preserve the balance of the location while minimizing the resemblance of the volume that they designed to a “traditional building”. The task was challenging, and the architects created three versions, one of which having been developed after the competition, where their main proposal took third place. However, the point of interest here is not the competition result but the continuity of creative thinking.

Object

Hide and Seek

The ID Moskovskiy house, designed by Stepan Liphart in St. Petersburg, in the courtyards near Moskovskiy Avenue beyond the Obvodny Canal and recently completed, is notable for several reasons. Firstly, it has been realized with considerable accuracy, which is particularly significant as this is the first building where the architect was responsible not only for the facades but also for the layouts, allowing for better integration between the two. On the other hand, this building is interesting as an example of the “germination” of new architecture in the city: it draws on the best examples from the neighborhood and becomes an improved and developed sum of ideas found by the architect in the surrounding context.

The Big Twelve

Yesterday, the winners of the Moscow Mayor’s Architecture Award were announced and honored. Let’s take a look at what was awarded and, in some cases, even critique this esteemed award. After all, there is always room for improvement, right?

Object

Above the Golden Horn

The residential complex “Philosophy” designed by T+T architects in Vladivostok, is one of the new projects in the “Golubinaya Pad” area, changing its development philosophy (pun intended) from single houses to a comprehensive approach. The buildings are organized along public streets, varying in height and format, with one house even executed in gallery typology, featuring a cantilever leaning on an art object.

Report

Nuanced Alternative

How can you rhyme a square and space? Easily! But to do so, you need to rhyme everything you can possibly think of: weave everything together, like in a tensegrity structure, and find your own optics too. The new exhibition at GES-2 does just that, offering its visitor a new perspective on the history of art spanning 150 years, infused with the hope for endless multiplicity of worlds and art histories. Read on to see how this is achieved and how the exhibition design by Evgeny Ace contributes to it.

Object

Blinds for Ice

An ice arena has been constructed in Domodedovo based on a project by Yuri Vissarionov Architects. To prevent the long façade, a technical requirement for winter sports facilities, from appearing monotonous, the architects proposed the use of suspended structures with multidirectional slats. This design protects the ice from direct sunlight while giving the wall texture and detail.

Contest Results

Frozen Magma

A competition for the creation of a public and cultural center was held in Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky. Three architectural companies made it to the final, and we consider it important to share about the work of each. Let’s start with the winner – the consortium led by Wowhaus.

Report

Campus within a Day

In this article, we talk about what the participants of Genplan Institute of Moscow’s hackathon were doing at the MosComArchitecture booth at the “ArchMoscow” exhibition. We also discuss who won the prize and why, and what can be done with the territory of a small university on the outskirts of Moscow.

Overview

Vertical Civilization

Genpro considered the development of the vertical city concept and made it the theme of their pavilion at the “ArchMoscow” exhibition.