The Black Mountain

The project of reconstructing the Krasnoyarsk Opera and Ballet theater developed by Wowhaus, which won the competition, proposed a total demolition and new construction, as well as considerable expansion (up to 8 floors) – and transformable multifunctional spaces. The new project, however, does retain the recognizable elements and the image of the old theater. As for the main spectator hall, it is turned – figuratively speaking, of course – into a semblance of a black volcano.

Written by:
Julia Tarabarina
Translated by:
Anton Mizonov

09 June 2023

Contest Results

The competition for the reconstruction of the Krasnoyarsk Opera and Ballet Theater named after Khvorostovsky was conducted in early 2023. The prize fund was 3 million rubles: 1.5 million for first place, 1 million for the second, and 500 thousand rubles for third. The results were announced in April; the winner was the Wowhaus project, second place went to Studio 44, and third place went to a consortium of Krasnoyarsk bureau A2 and Moscow NVP. However, a working group is being formed, which should summarize the ideas of “not only the winning company, but also other participants in the competition”. The projects are published on the website of the contest and on the website of its operator, the Institute of Urban Development in Krasnoyarsk. We plan to showcase the winning projects one by one because it was a major competition for a significant public building in the city center, and moreover, providing for the reconstruction of a modernist theater.

The theater was built in 1966-1978 upon the project by Ivan Mikhalev, and, curiously, he designed it specifically as a music theater before it was ever completed, it was turned into an “opera and ballet theater”, which, according to its current director Svetlana Guziy, presupposes a staff twice as large. This effectively means that the troupe would have found themselves in close quarters by default. Over the recent decades, as the requirements for the theatrical art grew stricter, the space became even more cramped. Accordingly, the reconstruction, designed and supported by the Nornickel company, provides for a considerable expansion, but the brief specifically stipulated the necessity for keeping up the image of the old theater and the square in front of it: “The theater square must come to our descendants in the state it was devised 45 years ago”.

zooming — Concept of reconstruction of the Krasnoyarsk State Opera and Ballet Theater named after D.A. Khvorostovsky

Copyright: © WOWHAUS

The concept by Wowhaus includes demolition and new construction: on the plan, the building is expanded 11 meters length-wise and 10 meters width-wise. The height remains the same, but the building gets underground floors – below the zero elevation, the architects are placing a restaurant, a foyer, and a museum, about which – the authors emphasize – the theater has long since dreamed. The new theater building will have a total of 8 levels, which will make it possible to include everything you need, including dressing rooms on all the three floors, rehearsal halls, a duplicate stage for dress rehearsals and small-stage performances, and a hall for the children’s theater studio.

Despite the fact that the new building is built from scratch [UPD 21.06.223: in the project, the architects retain the grand auditorium, the stage, and its pockets], the architects liken it to the old one as part of the image retention. For example, in the project the volume is also composed of two parallelepipeds with the upper projection of the columns; the architects reproduce the star-cross-shaped “cosmic” pattern of the concrete lattice of the stained glass window, the horseshoe-shaped volume of the hall, sculpturally protruding from outside, and even the colonnades on the sides – only with increasing scale the columns lose their solidity and turn into a series of thin supports; the pauses between them and the center increase. Even the inscription on the frieze is similar, although, obeying the new scale, it too has become smaller and thinner. Everything is similar, but different, and, executed in modern materials, looks recognizably unrecognizable. Maybe this approach even better embodies the idea, which was in the 1960s limited by the material base, even though you never can tell. A similar experiment to turn a 1950s building into a larger one was carried out by UNK architects in their work on the Palace of Water Sports, which replaced the Luzhniki swimming pool. What we are seeing is an enlarged paraphrase, but not a copy.

The architects save – in the original material – two sculptural groups of the “Muses”, carrying them over from the central location to the sides of the main entrance, i.e. to the side ends of the galleries.

Concept of reconstruction of the Krasnoyarsk State Opera and Ballet Theater named after D.A. Khvorostovsky. The identity

Copyright: © WOWHAUS
Concept of reconstruction of the Krasnoyarsk State Opera and Ballet Theater named after D.A. Khvorostovsky. The basic principles

Copyright: © WOWHAUS

Concept of reconstruction of the Krasnoyarsk State Opera and Ballet Theater named after D.A. Khvorostovsky

Copyright: © WOWHAUS
Concept of reconstruction of the Krasnoyarsk State Opera and Ballet Theater named after D.A. Khvorostovsky

Copyright: © WOWHAUS

It’s a rather curious experience watching how one turns into the other. In the new project, the following happens: the entrance group disappears or becomes all but invisible (how does it look on the 3D renders, I wonder?); and this entrance group cuts significantly into the starry stained-glass window of the original building. [UPD 21.06.2023: according to the architects, the entrance group was rebuilt many times, and the one that exists now does not refer to the original project]. At the same time, what appears behind the glass is a whirl of the spectator area and balconies, from which one will be able to get to different stage levels – looks a bit like Wright’s Guggenheim – it continues the “horseshoe” volume of the amphitheater, situated higher up: now, the parallelepiped has not just one volume inserted into it, but two.

The theater now:

Now in the existing building the columns line the sides of the eastern volume of the foyer, while the western “stage” volume is designed laconically, like a crate. In the project, the foyer’s colonnades become, as we remember, more delicate and thin, and in the western part they also receive a continuation – in the form of tie rods inserted into the ledges of large grooves; the wall receives a meaningful relief, which was not present in the original building, it brings a note of Art Deco in the context of its basically modernist project (which quite suddenly echoes the Palace of Water Sports, where, however, the Art Deco component is original). At the junction of the two volumes evacuation stairs are situated – here there is a narrow transverse “layer”, sandwiched between the walls.

The sidewall now:

The new scale, the new fragility and thinness of the building, which inherits the ideas of the modernist theater, but not its proportions, receives a contrasting response in the image of the main hall: it is clearly inspired by the memory of one of the main landmarks of the region, the extinct volcano “Black Mountain” – the audience, figuratively of course, but judging by the pictures, still quite tangibly, is placed “inside” a black volcano with a rounded, rough and dark wall surface: the image rhymes well with the acoustic panels. The glowing circle of the main chandelier is likened to the vent of the volcano, at which we are looking, therefore, from within. On the whole, it is obvious that the blackness of the new hall, convenient for performances, becomes a contrast to the light whiteness of the facades and foyer.

The minor hall and the duplicating halls will be designed in a slightly simpler way because you can’t peddle the idea of the “core” everywhere, and the rehearsal halls will be even lighter.

The main stage is equipped with mechanisms and is designed to be transformed. It is planned in a cross shape, like an Egyptian “Ankh” symbol, with the auditorium “loop” at the base. In the center; there are 35 sliding cubic podiums; from the rear stage at the top of the cross, the turntable can be moved out, and when it moves out it creates the possibility to build an additional “rear” amphitheater behind the rear stage, seating the audience on both sides of the stage. Several more mobile platforms are parked in the side wings, and the orchestra pit can be elevated to three different levels.

An additional stage is located in the northern part, to the right, and occupies the -1 and -2 floors. Its rectangular space is transformable thanks to a collapsible amphitheater. The other multi-purpose hall is semi-circular, situated directly under the main stage; here the multi-functionality is ensured by different variants of furniture arrangement.

One of the important features of the project is the highly developed system of public spaces, both around the theater and on the roof of the auditorium. Additional performances and film screenings are also possible on the roof, and in front of the entrance to the foyer under a large canopy.

The architects completely revise the square in front of the theater: it is already big as it is, 140 meters long; it has three fountains on it, a sculpture of Apollo, a couple of lions at the entrance, a certain quantity of trees on the perimeter, but otherwise the square is empty.

This square gets a lot of attention in the project. The square is multilevel: first, already now in its southern part, to the left and closer to the Yenisei river, where the height difference is from 4 to 5 meters, there is a four-level cascading staircase – the architects use it, preserving the fountain in the middle. Second, the area in front of the entrance is deepened and is accessed by a green city amphitheater with a zigzag-shaped ramp – Wowhaus already designed and built a similar one at the eastern entrance to Moscow’s Gorky Park; as a matter of fact, the amphitheater will make it possible to organize open-air performances.

Finally, on the sides of the square closer to Weinbaum Street, the architects propose two pavilions with terraced roofs, which also descend by steps toward the theater – so it turns out that all the surfaces consistently build up toward the city and descend to the entrance of the theater.

In addition, quite a lot of water is provided, a dry fountain, a cascade, ponds, as well as a winter scenario of using the square as an ice rink.

The pavilions are united with a canopy on thin metal supports – this peculiar standing portico marks the border of the square and somewhat levels the protrusions of the ends; besides, it reminds of the same entrance to Gorky Park from Leninsky Prospekt in Moscow.

As we can see, the project has the trademark Wowhaus style, and it is made according to the rules of modern theater buildings: grand-scale, transformable, and multifunctional. The task of turning the space around the theater and inside of it into a point of attraction for the urban community has been solved here at different levels and with the expectation for different audiences.

Some doubt is caused by the fact that the building becomes an elegant but still replica of the former theater, that is, it sort of freezes halfway, provoking the question: what do you ultimately need, the old building or the new one?

***
The judging panel of the competition:

Konstantin Shumov, Honorary Architect of the Russian Federation, Head of the Krasnoyarsk Krai Urban Planning Control Service; Chief Architect of the Krasnoyarsk Krai, Chairman of the Judging Panel

Arkady Zinov, Honored Artist of the Russian Federation, Minister of Culture of the Krasnoyarsk region, Deputy Chairman of the Judging Panel

Dmitry Bertman, General Director; Artistic Director of the Moscow Musical Theater Helikon Opera

Andrey Bokov, People’s Architect of the Russian Federation, Honorary President of the Union of Architects of Russia, Vice-President of the International Academy of Architecture, President of the Moscow branch of the International Academy of Architecture, Member of the Russian Academy of Architecture and Building Sciences, Corresponding Member of the Russian Academy of Arts

Andrey Borisov, Director of the Moscow Stanislavsky and Nemirovich-Danchenko Academic Musical Theater

Sergey Geraschenko, Honorary Architect of the Russian Federation, Professor of the Department of Urban Planning at the Institute of Architecture and Design of Siberian Federal University

Sergey Gnedovsky, People’s Architect of the Russian Federation, Vice-President of the Union of Architects of Russia, Academician of the Russian Academy of Architecture and Building Sciences

Elena Grigorieva, honored architect of the Russian Federation, vice president of the Union of Architects of Russia, member of the International Academy of Architecture, corresponding member of the Russian Academy of Architecture and Construction Sciences, editor-in-chief of Project Baikal

Svetlana Guziy, Director of the D.A. Khvorostovsky Krasnoyarsk State Theater of Opera and Ballet

Georgy Isaakyan, Artistic Director of the Natalia Satz Moscow State Academic Children’s Musical Theater, Laureate of the State Prizes of the Russian Federation, Laureate of the President Prize of the Russian Federation, Honored Art Worker of the Russian Federation, Professor

Irina Korobina, professor of the Moscow Architectural Institute (State Academy), PhD in architecture, member of the International Academy of Architecture, member of the National Academy of Design, honorary member of the Russian Academy of Arts

Vladislav Loginov, Head of Krasnoyarsk

Yuri Oleynikov, Advisor to the Vice President of MMC Norilsk Nickel

Mikhail Rabushko, Minister of Construction of the Krasnoyarsk Territory

09 June 2023

Headlines now

Object

Health Factory

While working on a wellness and tourist complex on the banks of the Yenisei River, the architects at Vissarionov Studio set out to create healing spaces that would amplify the benefits of nature and medical treatments for both body and soul. The spatial solutions are designed to encourage interaction between the guests and the landscape, as well as each other.

Object

Grace and Unity

Villa “Grace”, designed by Roman Leonidov’s studio and built in the Moscow suburbs, strikes a balance between elegant minimalism and the expansive gestures of the Russian soul. The main house is conceived as a sequence of four self-contained volumes – each could exist independently, yet it chooses to be part of a whole. Unity is achieved through color and a system of shared spaces, while the rich plasticity of the forms – refined throughout the construction process – compensates for the near-total absence of decorative elements.

Object

Daring Brilliance

In this article, we are exploring “New Vision”, the first school built in the past 25 years in Moscow’s Khamovniki. The building has three main features: it is designed in accordance with the universal principles of modern education, fostering learning through interaction and more; second, the façades combine structural molded glass and metallic glazed ceramics – expensive and technologically advanced materials. Third, this is the school of Garden Quarters, the latest addition to Moscow’s iconic Khamovniki district. Both a costly and, in its way, audacious acquisition, it carries a youthful boldness in its statement. Let’s explore how the school is designed and where the contrasts lie.

Object

A Twist of the Core

A clever and concise sculptural solution – rotating each floor by N degrees – has created an ensemble of “dancing” towers: similar yet different, simple yet complex. The designers meticulously refined a single structural node and spent considerable effort on the column construction – after that, “everything else was easy”. The architects also rotated the core walls on each floor to maximize the efficiency of the office spaces.

Object

The Sculpting of Spring Forest Matter

We’ve been observing this building for a couple of years now: seemingly simple, perhaps even unassuming, it fits in remarkably well with the micro-district context shaped by the Moscow MCD road junctions. This building sticks in the memory of everyone who drives along the highway, even occasionally. In our opinion, Sergey Nikeshkin, by blending popular architectural techniques and approaches of the 2010s, managed to turn a seemingly simple structure into a statement “on the theme of a house as such”. Let’s figure out how this happened.

Object

Water and Wind Whet the Stone

The Arisha Terraces residential complex, designed by Asadov Architects, will be built in a district of Dubai dedicated to film and television production. To create shaded spaces and an intriguing silhouette, the architects opted for a funnel-shaped composition and nature-inspired forms of erosion and weathering. The roofs, podium, and underground spaces extend leisure opportunities within the boundaries of a man-made “oasis”.

Object

Elevation 5642

The Genplan Institute of Moscow has developed a comprehensive development project for three ski resorts in the Caucasus, which have been designated as special economic zones of the tourism and recreation type. The first of these zones is Elbrus. The project includes the construction of new ski runs, cable cars, and hotels, as well as the modernization of stations and improvements to the Azau tourist meadow. To expand the audience and enhance year-round appeal, a network of eco-trails is also being developed. In this article, we provide a detailed breakdown of each stage.

Object

The IT Town

Taking the example of the first completed phase of the “U” district, we examine how the new neighborhood in Innopolis will be organized. T+T Architects and HADAA formed a well-balanced and ingenious master plan with different types of housing, a green artery, a system of squares, and a park in the town’s central part.

Object

The Heart Lies Within

The second-phase building of the Evgeny Primakov School already won multiple awards while still in the design stage. Now that it’s completed, some unfinished nuances remain – most notably, the exposed ceiling structures, which ideally should have been concealed. However, given the priority placed on the building’s volumetric composition, this does not seem critical. What matters more is the “Wow!” effect created by the space itself.

Object

Magnetic Forces

“Krylatskaya 33” is the first large-scale residential complex to appear amidst the 1980s “micro-districts” that harmoniously coexist with the forests, the river, the slopes, and the sports infrastructure. Despite its imposing scale, the architects of Ostozhenka managed to turn the complex into something that can be best described as a “graceful dominant”. First, they designed the complex with consideration for the style and height of the surrounding micro-districts. Second, by introducing a pause in its tallest section, they created compositional tension – right along the urban planning axis of the area.

Object

Orion’s Belt

The Stone Khodynka 2 office complex, designed by Kleinewelt Architekten for the company Stone, is built with an ergonomic layout following “healthy building” principles: natural light, ventilation, and all the necessary features for an efficient office environment. On the outside, it resembles – like many contemporary buildings – an iPhone: sleek, glowing, glass-and-metal, edges elegantly rounded. Yet, it responds sensitively to the Khodynka context, where the main theme is the contrast between vertical and horizontal lines. The key intrigue lies in the design of the “stylobate” as a suspended passage, leaving the space beneath it open for free pedestrian movement.

Interview

Grigory Revzin: “It Was a Bold Statement Made on the Sly. Something Won”

In this article, we discuss the debates surrounding the circus competition and the demolition of the CMEA building with the most renowned architectural critic of our time. A paradox emerges in the process: while nostalgia for the Brezhnev era seems to be in vogue in Russia, a landmark building – the “axis” of the Warsaw Pact – has been sentenced to demolition. Isn’t that strange? We also find out that wow-architecture has made a comeback as a post-COVID trend. However, to make a truly powerful statement, professionals still remain indispensable.

Object

Exposed Concrete

One of the stages of improving a small square in the town of Lermontov was the construction of a skatepark. Entrusting this part of the project to the XSA team, the city gained a 250-meter trick track whose features resemble those of land art objects – unparalleled in Russia in both scale and design. Here’s a look at how the experimental snake run in the foothills of the Caucasus was built.

Object

One Step Closer To the Dream

The challenges of getting all the mandatory approvals, an insufficient budget, and construction site difficulties did not prevent ASADOV Bureau from achieving its main goal in the realization of the school project in the town of Troitsk – taking another step away from outdated notions of educational spaces toward creating a fundamentally new academic environment.

Object

Chalet on the Rock

An Accor hotel in Arkhyz, designed by A.Len, will be situated at the gateway to the resort’s main tourist hubs. The architects reinterpreted the widely popular chalet style while adding an unexpected twist – an unfinished structure preserved on the site. The design team transformed this remnant into an exciting space featuring an open-air pool and a restaurant with panoramic views of the region’s highest mountain ridges.

Interview

Sergey Skuratov: “By and large, the project has been realized in line with the original ideas”

In this issue, we talk to the chief architect of Garden Quarters, looking back at the history and key moments of a project that took 18 years to develop and has now finally been completed. What interests us most are the transformations that the project underwent during construction, and the way the “necessary void” of public space was formed, which turned this remarkable complex into a fragment of a whole new type of urban fabric – not just at the horizontal “street” level but in its vertical structure as well.

Object

A Unique Representative

The recently concluded year 2024 can be considered the year of completion for the “Garden Quarters” residential complex in Moscow’s Khamovniki. This project is well-known and, in many ways, iconic. Rarely does one manage to preserve such a number of original ideas, achieving in the end a kind of urban planning Gesamtkunstwerk. Here is a subjective view from an architecture journalist, with an interview with Sergey Skuratov soon to follow.

Object

Field of Life

The new project by the architectural company PNKB (an acronym for “Design, Research, and Advisory Bureau”), led by Sergey Gnedovsky and Anton Lyubimkin, for the Kulikovo Field Museum is dedicated to the field as a concept in its own right. The field has long been a focus of the museum’s thorough and successful research. Accordingly, the exterior of the new museum building is gentler than that of its predecessor, which was also designed by PNKB and dedicated specifically to the historic battle. Inside, however, the building confidently guides the visitor from a luminous atrium along a spiral path to the field – interpreted here as a field of life.

Object

A Paper Clip above the River

In this article, we talk with Vitaly Lutz from the Genplan Institute of Moscow about the design and unique features of the pedestrian bridge that now links the two banks of the Yauza River in the new cluster of Bauman Moscow State Technical University (MSTU). The bridge’s form and functionality – particularly the inclusion of an amphitheater suspended over the river – were conceived during the planning phase of the territory’s development. Typically, this approach is not standard practice, but the architects advocate for it, referring to this intermediate project phase as the “pre-AGR” stage (AGR stands for Architectural and Urban Planning Approval). Such a practice, they argue, helps define key parameters of future projects and bridge the gap between urban planning and architectural design.

Review

Living in the Architecture of One’s Own Making

Do architects design houses for themselves? You bet! In this article, we are examining a new book by TATLIN publishing house. This book – unprecedented for Russia – features 52 private homes designed and built by contemporary architects for themselves. It includes houses that are famous, even iconic, as well as lesser-known ones; large and small, stylish and eccentric. To some extent, the book reflects the history of Russian architecture over the past 30 years.

Object

A City Block Isoline

Another competition project for a residential complex on the banks of the Volga in Nizhny Novgorod has been prepared by Studio 44. A team of architects led by Ivan Kozhin concluded that using a regular block layout in such a location would be inappropriate and developed a “custom design” approach: a chain of parceled multi-section buildings stretching along the entire embankment. Let’s explore the features and advantages of this unconventional method.

Report

Competition: The Price of Creativity?

Any day now, we’re expecting the results of a competition held by the “Samolet” development group for a plot in Kommunarka. In the meantime, we share the impressions of Editor-in-Chief Julia Tarabarina, who managed to conduct a public talk. Though technically focused on the interaction between developers and architects, the public talk turned into a discussion about the pros and cons of architectural competitions.

Object

Terraced Design

The “River Park” residential complex has confidently and securely shaped the Nagatinsky Backwater shoreline. Featuring a public embankment, elevated courtyards connected by pedestrian bridges, and brick façades, the development invites exploration of its nuanced response to the surrounding context, as well as hints of the architects’ megalithic design thinking.

A Kremlin’s Core and Meteorite Fragments

We continue our coverage of the competition projects for the residential district that the development company GloraX plans to build along the embankment of the Rowing Channel in Nizhny Novgorod. ASADOV Architects approached the concept through a deep dive into local identity, using storytelling to pinpoint a central idea for the design: the master plan and composition are imagined as if a meteorite had struck a “proto-Kremlin”. Sounds weird? Find more details below!

Contest Results

The Volga Regatta

GloraX plans to develop a residential complex spanning 14 hectares along the Volga River in Nizhny Novgorod. The winning design in a closed-door competition, created by GORA Architects, features housing typologies ranging from townhouses to terraced high-rise slabs, a balance of functions, diverse ways of engaging with the water, and even a dedicated island (no less!) for the city residents.

Object

Life Plans

The master plan for the residential district “Prityazheniye” (“Gravity”) in Naberezhnye Chelny was developed by the architectural company A.Len, taking into account the specific urban planning context and partially implemented solutions of the first phase. However, the master plan prioritized its own values: a green framework, a system of focal points, a hierarchy of spaces, and pedestrian priority. After this, the question of what residents will do in their neighborhood simply doesn’t arise.

Object

A New Track

We took a thorough look at D_Station, a railcar repair depot dating back to 1906, recently reconstructed while preserving its century-old industrial structure, upon the project by Sergey Trukhanov and T+T Architects. Though work on the interiors – set to house restaurants and public spaces – is still underway, the building’s exterior already offers plenty to see. Visitors can explore the blend of old and new brickwork, appreciate the architect’s unique interpretation of ruin aesthetics, and enjoy the newly built pedestrian route that connects the Citydel Business Center’s arches to Kazakova Street.

Report

Four Different Surveys

The “Explore the City” competition, organized this year by the Genplan Institute of Moscow, stands out as a pretty unconventional one for the architectural field but aligns perfectly well with the character of urban planning work. The winning project analyzed contemporary residential complexes, combining urban planning insights with a realtor’s perspective to propose a hybrid approach. Other entries explored public centers, motivations for car ownership, and housing vacancy rates. A fifth participant withdrew. Here’s a closer look at the four completed works.

Report

Scheduled Evolution

ASADOV Architects unveiled the EvyCenter pavilion, a microcultural hub for fostering personal growth, organizing workshops, and doing gymnastics. Additionally, this pavilion serves as a prototype for a scalable country house, drawing inspiration from the “Loskutok” project, and constructed from CLT panels in a factory. This marks the beginning of a developer project initiated by the architectural firm (sic!), which is seeking partners to expand both small Evy settlements and even larger Evy cities, which are, according to Andrey Asadov, aimed at fostering the “evolutionary” development of the people who will inhabit them.

Object

The Golden Crown

The concept for a dental clinic in Yekaterinburg, developed by CNTR Studio, revolves around the idea of a “mouth full of gold”: pristine white porcelain stoneware walls are complemented by matte brass details. To avoid an overly literal interpretation, the architects focused on the building’s proportions, skillfully navigating between sunlight requirements and fire safety regulations.