Analysis and Synthesis

The embankment of the Big Neva of the Vasilyevsky Island is a place that is very quickly changing its character: in the east part, it starts with Strelka, Stock Exchange, Kunstkamera the old building of the University, and other famous tourist attractions. Then it continues with the Academy of Arts, an exquisite building designed by Vallain Delamont. And it ends with the Dorian portico of the Mining University, an austere, almost harsh statement in the pure dialect of classicism. However, this is where it all ends – the industrial area begins with a port area and ships in the distance. The city of museums and monuments abruptly gives way to a few constructivist buildings, which back in their days were built to cater for the factories. West of the Mining University, starts the territory of the Baltic Shipyard and a few factories of a smaller scale: ropes, leather, and electrical appliances. Here, on the Neva, one can even now see two atomic icebreakers, Siberia and Urals.

The industrial areas, however, are already being transformed, partially into art clusters – like the Sevkabel factory situated a kilometer and a half away from here – but chiefly into city housing projects. The city, as is the custom in our postindustrial time, is gradually invading the factory grounds, turning them from restricted areas into residential ones, and, to various degrees, public. Specifically, west of the Mining University, the developer company Setl City is building two housing complexes: one of them, situated further away from the river, named “Palazzo” is almost complete – it consists of differently colored sections that take their colors from the neighboring lines of the Vasilyevsky island with a slight enhancement of their brightness. The other housing complex, built by the same developer, has been recently designed by Nikita Yavein’s Studio 44 in a more obliging place – right on the waterfront, next to the Voronikhin portico. The city council considered and approved the project in April.

The housing complex “Krasin”, named after the icebreaker, which has now been turned into a museum, moored directly in front of it, is located on the territory of the former boiler design bureau, which moved in 2018. Historically, this place is known as “Maslyany Buyan” (“Buyan”, a dated Russian word, was a moor for unloading cargoes, and a place where warehouses were situated). As early as in the 1940s, it became an artificial island, separated from the mainland by the Maslyany Channel, which the ships could enter for loading and unloading, and where they subsequently moored like in a bay. By the 1960s, the canal was filled up, but the surrounding area on both sides of the street is named “Oil Channel”.

The surroundings, as was already said, are contrastive and valuable, albeit in different ways. The ice breaker and the portico of the Mining University work together to create the classic “St. Petersburg tourist attraction” theme, making it necessary for the new buildings to be a little bit uptight, and, of course, it was the Voronikhin building that became the reason for the height restrictions – 22m close to it, 33m a little bit further away from it. In addition, the site is situated within the limits of the “historical settlement”, and the complex will be plainly visible from the Neva, which makes the height restrictions particularly strict: hence the pitched roofs with a 25-degree tilt, the decrease of the height towards the river, a moderate tone of the facades, and natural-looking textures of brick and stone.

Other elements of the context are not as obvious, but also important. These are the Paramonov Leather Factory, located in the west, on the opposite side of the Maslyany Kanal Street, and the late 19-century buildings in the spirit of industrial historicism of the classic nature – there are plans that these will host a health center and a school; nearby in the north there will probably be still another block of the housing complex.

The Maslyany Kanal Street makes a right-angle turn to the right, and one can see here yet another landmark – the water tower of the rope shop, built by Yakov Chernikhov, an elegant urban accent on slender concrete legs.

In addition, the residential buildings of Vasilievsky Island, situated to the east and north, provide an example of a restrained and diverse development front, ranging from classicism to historicism to modernism, while factory buildings of the 19th century to the west show an inclination towards the red-brick style of facades. As for the territory of the Maslyany Buyan itself, it was built up in the late Soviet era with three dull factory buildings, one of which was leased out for offices in recent years.

Thus, it comes as no surprise that the work for such an obliging place was preceded by a serious urban planning analysis – first of all, it covered the place of the new complex as part of the hippodamus grid of the streets of Vasilievsky Island. As is known, it is clear and simple, consisting of rather large rectangles: back in the day, Trezzini proposed a grid of streets with a cell 320 meters wide. Then finer fracturing came about, and the space between the streets stretching from northwest to southeast is now 160 meters. Historically, however, inside some of the quarters, there was a longitudinal internal passage, dividing the block into parts longitudinally (and sometimes transversely) – this is how the narrowest street in the city, Repin Street, appeared. If we take into account such cases and divide the cell in half by meridian, the cell width is already close to the “Manhattan” type: 80 meters.

The architects also take into account this division, which historically existed in an unmanifested form, but is read in the intra-quarter voids, and is supported by the peculiar numbering of the streets: on Vasilievsky Island, they do not count the driveways as such, but the lines of houses, so each street has a “paired” name, for example, “Lines 4 and 5”. The street that leads to Maslyany Buyan is “Lines 24 and 25”.

The architects took the most fractional division module as a basis – the site was divided into three equal strips with two internal streets, one of which continues the line “24 and 25”. Currently, Lines 24 and 25 stop in a dead end in front of the Maslyany Canal Street – in the project it is planned to extend it to the embankment with a pedestrian promenade running inside the housing complex, although, according to the developer’s decision, it will, unfortunately, be open only to its residents. However, it will create, nevertheless, a promising passage.

The result is compact 4 and 6-story city blocks, subjugated to the grid of Vasilievsky Island and at the same time drawn more regularly, with thin extended frames. The Neva makes a turn here, and the rectangles systematically grow in an arc, not following the curve of the embankment, but protruding forward in “angle” steps. The authors “spied” this planning technique on the neighboring embankment of the 18th-19th centuries, where all the facades are parallel to the direction of the avenues of Vasilievsky Island, and are thus inscribed in a common orthogonal grid. In front of the arc of the river, they form “angle” steps.

In the Krasin residential complex, this “step-like” character of the plan is more pronounced from the side of the waterfront: while in the historical front the zigzag contour is formed by the facades of individual houses, here it is formed by the ends of the city blocks, two sections in each. From the side of the river, triangular plazas are formed between them – this architectural gesture as a whole becomes more monumental, the juxtaposition of geometric angles and the smooth river bend becomes a contrast between man-made and natural, showing one of the characteristic features of St. Petersburg.

The indentations of the side ends of the city blocks are also uniform in the spirit of the “megalithic” attitude to volumes, typical of Nikita Yavein’s projects. Each end receives a continuation in the front of the neighboring block in the form of narrow, as if cut with a knife, gaps – they support the transverse direction of the grid and provide laconic caesuras, making it possible to avoid excessively long rows, at the same time opening passages to the courtyards.

Thus, it turns out that at the level of general outlines of volumetric construction, the ideas were discovered by the architects in the historical development of Vasilyevsky Island – taken as a basis, but brought to a certain stereometric denominator, and thereby sharpened and strengthened. This approach to the context is particularly interesting because of its analytical nature.

As for the facades, the opposite process takes place – while the volumes as a whole tend to regularity and enlargement, the facades are made deliberately fragmented, enlivened by a variety of textures, materials and geometry. Each section – 44 in total – received its own pattern and height, slightly different from the neighboring ones, which resulted in slight fluctuations in the silhouette. The parameters of all the sections were also the result of an analysis of the building structure of Vasilievsky Island, primarily its waterfront.

Therefore, the width of most of the sections is like that of the historical facades along the river, which ie 22 meters. From the rear side of the complex, this figure doubles up to 50 m – but no more than that. Here, the side-end houses are crowned with colonnades of attics, which is why they acquire greater monumentality, building on this side a semblance (or, perhaps, a “seed”) of an avenue.

The facades pick up the rhythm and scale of the old buildings, but completely exclude direct quotes from the decor of historical architecture, focusing on rhythm, proportions, texture and tone. From the side of the Mining University and the regular historical city, where the altitude is lower, stone and light colors prevail. From the opposite side, from the west, as well as from the north, where the complex borders on industrial buildings and grows in height, there are more dark bricks. The complex responds with facades to almost all of its neighbors.

Closer to the water tower designed by the avant-garde architect Yakov Chernikhov, the role of round windows, characteristic of the architecture of the 1920s-1930s and, in addition, loved by Nikita Yavein, becomes more noticeable (he considers it necessary to add at least one round window to each of his projects; such a window is also to be seen in the architect’s study).

On the facades, the “multilayered” method is actively used: one material, for example a brick, is treated as a large external “grid”, another, for example a stone, as the internal matter. Glass livens up the traditional materials with protrusions of balconies and bay windows, thin fences and plastic “sightseeing” cylinders at the corners – but in general the glass is not really abundant, there is even a diagram in the design materials that clearly demonstrates the predominance of “stone” surfaces.

On the other hand, the architects are not using painted stucco at all here – which is a little bit counterintuitive because this is the “signature” facade material for the Vasilyevsky Island. This makes it possible to avoid garishness and enhance the respectability – for a modern housing complex in the center of the city, “natural facade materials” are definitely a plus.

If historical details are ethically prohibited for architects, then the historical silhouette, on the contrary, is quite the right thing to do. In addition to the slight variability of the height of the sections and pitched roofs, ventilation outlets, designed in the form of plates resembling groups of chimneys, and in some cases placed on the sidewalls we and sharply reminiscent of fireplaces, work to make the silhouette of the “old city” recognizable.

The yards inside the city blocks are elevated to the stylobate floors. From the street, they can be accessed by monumental staircases with amphitheaters.

The city gallery stretches along the western facade of the complex along Maslyany Canal Street in front of a continuous line of shops: it expands the sidewalk, allowing you to walk past the shop windows and hide from the rain. At the same time, it partially makes up for the residents-only status of the inner streets of the complex – you can easily walk past it to the Lieutenant Schmidt embankment.

Underneath each of the blocks, there is a tier of underground parking, combined with storage rooms for the residents. Beneath the courtyard, there is another level of parking, the overland one. The spaces located at the city level are complex and, of course, not all of them are occupied by parking lots: many cafes and shops are planned along the outer perimeter of the buildings, and some of the premises under the courtyards within the city blocks are given to fitness facilities with two swimming pools, one of them, of a larger size, being illuminated by large beautiful skylights from the yard. Thus, despite the fact that the inner streets of the complex will only be accessible to the residents, the complex will still give the city a lot.

On the first floors there are apartments with their own front gardens facing the inner boulevards. The complex is quite expensive (this is how the press describes it, and its location and low altitude oblige it to a “closed-door” format), so its apartment layout is pretty diverse – there are three- and four-room apartments – the latter are grouped mainly at the corners with sweeping views of the Neva.

As we can see, this premium class residential complex in the center of St. Petersburg is the result of thoughtful analytical work with the context – in addition to responding to the visual features of the environment, it is tuned in to the continuation and development of the structure of the urban fabric, dating back to the regular planning of the 18th century. Some of its features are deliberately enhanced and exaggerated for the sake of responding to the features of the site and the task at hand. A small, comfortable height is due to the height restrictions and is supported by the high-end status of the project. The emphasized rhythmic diversity becomes a response to the fine cut of the facades of historical buildings. Ultimately, the complex becomes a kind of “transitional link” between two very different parts of the city: historical center and the industrial area. The port cranes and ships, both museum and under construction, add some piquancy to the atmosphere; the residential complex is becoming the next step in the urban fabric, comfortable and inhabited, a step towards expansion and replication based on the module once set by Trezzini and Leblond.

zooming — “Krasin” housing complex. Left: Krasin Icebreaker. Right: the mining University

Copyright: © Studio 44

1 / 6

“Krasin” housing complex. Detailed plan of St. Petersburg by Major General Schubert 1828, plan of Leningrad 1934

Copyright: © Studio 44
2 / 6

“Krasin” housing complex. Plan of “Maslyany Buyan” in its Vasilevsky Island part, 1876

Copyright: © Studio 44
3 / 6

“Krasin” housing complex. The Oil Channel, Luftwaffe footage, 1942

Copyright: © Studio 44
4 / 6

“Krasin” housing complex. A photograph made by an American satellite

Copyright: © Studio 44
5 / 6

“Krasin” housing complex. Topographic plan of Leningrad, a fragment, 1977

Copyright: © Studio 44
6 / 6

“Krasin” housing complex. Topographic plan of Leningrad, a fragment, 1989

Copyright: © Studio 44

“Krasin” housing complex. Project plan of Vasilievsky Island Domenico Trezzini 1717

Copyright: © Studio 44
“Krasin” housing complex. Development of Vasilievsky Island according to the fixing plan. Fragment of the plan of 1726

Copyright: © Studio 44

“Krasin” housing complex. Map of valuable elements of the planning and landscape-compositional structure

Copyright: © Studio 44
“Krasin” housing complex. Line 24-25 of Vasilyevsky Island

Copyright: © Studio 44

“Krasin” housing complex. Preserved in the present time internal passages and meridional connections

Copyright: © Studio 44
“Krasin” housing complex. The streets and the inner passages

Copyright: © Studio 44

1 / 3

“Krasin” housing complex. The current parcellation

Copyright: © Studio 44
2 / 3

“Krasin” housing complex. The current state

Copyright: © Studio 44
3 / 3

“Krasin” housing complex. The project proposal.

Copyright: © Studio 44

1 / 6

“Krasin” housing complex. Section View 3-3

Copyright: © Studio 44
2 / 6

“Krasin” housing complex. Section View 2-2

Copyright: © Studio 44
3 / 6

“Krasin” housing complex. Section View

Copyright: © Studio 44
4 / 6

“Krasin” housing complex, Section View A-A

Copyright: © Studio 44
5 / 6

“Krasin” housing complex. Plan of the basement

Copyright: © Studio 44
6 / 6

“Krasin” housing complex. Plan of the 1st floor

Copyright: © Studio 44

1 / 3

“Krasin” housing complex. Plan of the 2nd floor

Copyright: © Studio 44
2 / 3

“Krasin” housing complex. Plan of the standard floor

Copyright: © Studio 44
3 / 3

“Krasin” housing complex. Plan of the 7th floor

Copyright: © Studio 44

30 September 2021

Written by:
Julia Tarabarina
Translated by:
Anton Mizonov

Headlines now

Interview

Julius Borisov: “The “Island” housing complex is a unique project – we took it on with...

One of the largest housing projects of today’s Moscow – the “Ostrov” (“Island”) housing complex built by Donstroy – is now being actively built in the Mnevniky Floodplain. They are planning to build about 1.5M square meters of housing on an area of almost 40 hectares. We are beginning to examine this project– first of all, we are talking to Julius Borisov, the head of the architectural company UNK, which works with most of the residential blocks in this grand-scale project, as well as with the landscaping part; the company even proposed a single design code for the entire territory.

Object

A Balanced Solution

The residential complex “Balance” on Moscow’s Ryazansky Prospekt is one of the large-scale, and relatively economical (again, by Moscow standards) housing projects. Its first phase has already been built and landscaped; the work on the others is in progress. Nevertheless, it has an integral internal logic, which is based on the balance of functions, height, and even image and space composition. The proposed solutions are recognizable and laconic, so that each of them was reduced by the authors to a graphic “logo”. To see everything, you have to flip through the pages and look through to the end.

Object

Horror Vacui

In the city of Omsk, ASADOV architects took on a very challenging task: they are developing a concept of a public and residential complex, which involves reconstructing the city’s first thermal power station standing right next to Omsk’s first fortress. This territory has already seen a lot of projects designed for it, and the residential function of this land site has been the subject of heated debate. In this article, we are examining the project in question, aimed at developing a mid-scale city fabric suited for the historical center. We also examine the above-mentioned debate. Seriously, will this project save this place or will it bring it to ruin?

Object

A Multi-Faced Grotto

This building, seemingly small, unremarkable, semi-ruined, and not even very ancient – the Grotto in the Bauman Garden – was restored by the “People’s Architect” architectural company with all the care applicable to a heritage monument. They preserved the romantic appeal of the ruins, added multimedia content, and explored the cascading fountain, which, as it turned out, was completely preserved. Brace yourself for a long story!

Object

First among Equals

The building of a kindergarten in the town of Beloyarsky is more than just another example of a modern educational space. Its design began a long time ago; it is located in Russia’s Far North; it is also a state-owned facility that is subject to regulations, and had to cut costs during construction (as usual). However, the design is contemporary, the layout is modern, and the building feels very fresh. The project is planned to be replicated.

Review

Gustave Falconnier

In the “ruin” wing of Moscow’s Museum of Architecture, an exhibition of “glass bricks” by Gustave Falconnier is open. These “bricks” are essentially the predecessors of glass blocks, but more complex and beautiful. The exhibition shows genuine “bricks”, buildings composed of them, the history of the destruction of Falconnier windows in the building of the State Archives, and it also became one of the reasons to revive this unique production technology.

Object

Streamline for City Canyons

Stepan Liphart has designed two houses for two small land sites situated in the area surrounding the Varshavsky Railway Station, which is being intensively developed now. The sites are situated close but not next to each other, and they are different, yet similar: the theme is the same but it is interpreted in different ways. In this issue, we are examining and comparing both projects.

Object

The Eastern Frontier

“The Eastern Arc” is one of the main land resources of Kazan’s development, concentrated in the hands of a single owner. The Genplan Institute of Moscow has developed a concept for the integrated development of this territory based on an analytical transport model that will create a comfortable living environment, new centers of attraction, and new workplaces as well.

Object

A School of Our Time

On the eve of the presentation of the new book by ATRIUM, dedicated to the design of schools and other educational facilities, based on the architects’ considerable experience, as well as expert judgments, we are examining the Quantum STEM school building, constructed according to their project in Astana. Furthermore, this building is planned to be the first one to start a new chain. The architects designed it in full accordance with modern standards but sometimes they did break away from them – only to confirm the general development rules. For example, there are two amphitheaters in the atrium, and there is an artificial hill in the yard that is meant to make the flat terrain of the Kazakhstan steppe more eventful.

Object

The Fluffy Space

Designing the passenger terminal of the Orenburg airport, ASADOV architects continue to explore the space theme that they first introduced in Saratov and Kemerovo airports. At the same time, the architects again combine the global and the local, reflecting topics inspired by the local conceptual context. In this case, the building is “covered” by an Orenburg downy shawl – an analogy that is recognizable enough, yet not literal; some will see the reference and some won’t.

Object

The White Fitness Center

The white health and fitness center, designed by Futura Architects at the entrance to St. Petersburg’s New Piter residential complex, provides the developing area not only with functional but also with sculptural diversity, livening up the rows of the brick city blocks with the whiteness of its seamless facades, cantilevered structures, and dynamic inclined lines.

Contest Results

The New Dawn

In their project of a technology park to be built on the grounds of “Integrated Home-Building Factory 500” in Tyumen Oblast – the biggest in Russia – the HADAA architects preserve not just the industrial function of the giant hangar built in the late 1980s and 90% of its structures, but also respond to its imagery. They also propose a “gradient” approach to developing the available areas: from open public ones to staff-only professional spaces. The goal of this approach is to turn the technology park into the driver for developing the business function between the industrial zones and the future residential area in accordance with the Integrated Land Development program.

News

Tame Hills for New Residents

T+T Architects have reported that they have completed the landscaping project for the yard of the first stage of Alexandrovsky Garden housing complex in Ekaterinburg – the landscape complements the contextual architecture, tailored for the buyers’ preferences and downtown standards, with bold neo modernist master strokes and lush and diverse vegetation.

Object

The Crystal of the City Block

The typology and plastique of large housing complexes move with the times, and you can sometimes find new subtleties in the scope of seemingly familiar solutions. The Sky Garden complex combines two well-known themes, forming a giant residential area consisting of tall slender towers, placed at the perimeter of a large yard, in which a crossroads of two pedestrian promenades is “dissolved”.

Object

Sunshine, Air, and Water

The construction of the “Solnechny” (“Sunny”) summer camp, designed by ARENA project institute, has been completed, the largest summer camp within the legendary Artek seaside resort for children. It was conceived still in Soviet time, but it was not implemented. The modern version surprises you with sophisticated engineering solutions that are combined with a clear-cut structure: together, they generate Asher-esque spaces.

Object

Art Deco at the Edge of Space

The competition project by Stepan Liphart – a high-end residential complex executed in a reserved classicist style in close proximity to the Kaluga Space Museum – responds equally well to the context and to the client’s brief. It is moderately respectable, moderately mobile and transparent, and it even digs a little into the ground to comply with strict height restrictions, without losing proportions and scale.

Object

A Hill behind the Wall

The master plan of a new residential area in Yuzhno-Sakhalinsk, developed by the Genplan Institute of Moscow with the participation of Kengo Kuma & Associates, is based on the complexities and advantages of the relief of the foothills: the houses are arranged in cascades, and multi-level improvement penetrates all the blocks, continuing in forest trails.

Object

Going, Going, Gone!

The housing complex “Composers’ Residences” has been built in accordance with the project by Sergey Skuratov, who won the international competition back in 2011. It all began from the image search and “cutting off all spare”, and then implementing the recognizable Skuratov architecture. It all ended, however, in tearing down the buildings of the Schlichterman factory, whose conservation was stipulated by all the appropriate agencies prior to approving Skuratov’s project. This story seems to be educational and important for understanding the history of all the eleven years, during which the complex was designed and built.

Object

The Life of Iron

The building of the Vyksa Metallurgy Museum, designed by Nikita Yavein and Sergey Padalko, provides for the natural aging of metal – it is planned that the iron will gradually rust – at the same time utilizing the advanced type of construction, based on metal’s ability to stretch. The building will be constructed from pipes and rolled steel supplied by OMK company, as well as from recycled bricks.

Object

And the Brook is Flowing

ASADOV Architects have designed a master plan for developing a residential area at the outskirts of Kaliningrad: a regular grid of housing blocks is enriched by large-scale public facilities, the main “artery” of the new area being the fortification channel that regains its original function.

Object

Off We Go!

The new terminal of the Tomsk airport is being designed by ASADOV bureau. The architects keep on developing its identity, building the imagery upon the inventions of Nikolai Kamov, whose name the airport bears. The result is laconic, light, and, as always, levitating.

Object

Maximum Flexibility

The Multispace Dinamo, which recently opened within the Arena business center, is an example of a project that is entirely based upon cutting-edge approaches and technologies. It is managed via a mobile application, special software was created for it, and the spaces are not just multifunctional but carefully mixed up, like some kind of jigsaw puzzle that allows the office workers to mix their working routine for better efficiency.

Object

A Factory’s Path

Last week, the new center for constructivist studies “Zotov” hosted its first exhibition named “1922. Constructivism. The Inception”. The idea of creating this center belongs to Sergey Tchoban, while the project of the nearest houses and adjusting the building of the bread factory for the new museum function was done by the architect in collaboration with his colleagues from SPEECH. We decided that such a complex project should be examined in its entirety – and this is how we came up with this long-read about constructivism on Presnya, conservation, innovation, multilayered approach, and hope.

Object

The Savelovsky Axis

The business center, situated right in the middle of a large city junction next to the Savelovsky Railway Station takes on the role of a spatial axis, upon which the entire place hinges: it spins like a spiral, alternating perfect glass of the tiers and deep recessions of inter-tier floors that conceal little windows invented by the architects. It is sculptural, and it claims the role of a new city landmark, in spite of its relatively small height of nine floors.

Overview

Parametric Waves

In the housing complex Sydney City, which FSK Group is building in the area of Shelepikhinskaya Embankment, Genpro designed the central city block, combining parametric facades and modular technology within its architecture.

Object

The Multitone

The new interior of the Action Development headquarters can be regarded as an attempt to design the perfect “home” for the company – not just comfortable but broadcasting the values of modern development. It responds to the context, yet it is built on contrast, it is fresh but cozy, it is dynamic, yet it invites you to relax – everything of this coexists here quite harmoniously, probably because the architects found an appropriate place for each of the themes.

View

Refinement No Longer Relevant

A few days ago journalists were shown the building of Bread Factory #5, renovated upon the project by Sergey Tchoban. In this issue, we are publishing Grigory Revzin’s thoughts about this project.

Object

The Comb of Strelna

In this issue, we are taking a close look at the project that won the “Crystal Daedalus” award – the “Veren Village” housing complex in Strelna, designed by Ostozhenka. Its low-rise format became a trigger for typological and morphological experiments – seemingly, we are seeing recognizable trends, yet at the same time there are a multitude of subtleties that are a pleasure to go into. Having studied this project in detail, we think that the award is well-deserved.

Object

A Tectonic Shift

For several years now, Futura Architects have been working with the “New Peter” residential area in the south of St. Petersburg. In this article, we are covering their most recent project – a house, in which the architects’ architectural ideas peacefully coexist with the limitations of comfort-class housing, producing a “multilayered” effect that looks very attractive for this typology.

Report

Three “Green” Stories

In this issue, we are examining three environmental urban projects showcased by the Genplan Institute of Moscow at the Zodchestvo festival. The scale of the projects is really diverse: from gathering information and suggestions from the residents on a city scale to growing meadow grass between houses to paintings, which, as it turned out, possess power to cure trees, healing their wounded bark. + a list of kinds of plants natural for Moscow to help the developer.

​Analysis and Synthesis

Analysis and Synthesis