Aleksandr Skokan. Interview by Grigory Revzin

Aleksandr Skokan is one of the participants of the exhibition of the Russian pavilion at 11th architectural biennale in Moscow

Grigory Revzin

Written by:
Grigory Revzin

03 September 2008

This is the first time that the Moscow school of architecture has been represented in Venice. You have played a special part in this school…
You know, I wanted to turn down the invitation to take part, but was dissuaded by Aleksey Dobashin, a client of our firm, byuro Ostozhenka.

Why turn it down?
I don’t like collective events. And then: you’re exhibiting Russian architecture and opposing it to foreign architects working in Russia. Can you tell me: is there such a thing as, say, French architecture? I don’t think so. There is simply Jean Nouvel, Christian de Potzamparc, and others. The national architectures have, I think, ceased to exist: they have all broken up into individuals. The division into ours and not-ours could only take place in Russia. This division could and does exist; it’s an opposition that is very relevant at the moment. The market which is being invaded by foreigners is my market. But it seems to me that this opposition of us/not-us is a sign of a kind of provincialism, weakness. We ought to be above this and not notice and not even try to oppose ourselves to them as a national school.

The 20 architects who make up the elite in Moscow today share certain general principles. It’s probably difficult to identify the individual style of each of them, but the characteristics of a single school are immediately apparent. And it’s especially interesting to hear from you that there’s no such school, given that you are essentially its head.

And how would you define this school?
Contextualist Modernism. Additionally, this school has a number of special features, which are very Russian. Respect for historical context – not monuments, but ordinary buildings – and respect for modern foreign architecture. A tendency to look for rules which have to be obeyed. Architects of the Moscow contextualist school are not fond of creative gesture in itself; such gesture must always be motivated by something – and not just by function, but by the genius loci or some non-existent memories. The architect says, “I ought to do this” and not, “I want to do this.” At the same time, there is a relative lack of determination by pragmatic considerations. So “I ought to follow the local morphotype’”is always stronger than “I ought to squeeze out so many square metres.” A high value placed on restraint, politeness of behaviour, and the ability to be inconspicuous. All in all, this is, to a certain extent, an architectural expression of the programme of the late-Soviet intelligentsia.

Parts of this are probably true. We really do try to work not because we may have had a sudden idea which has shaped our design but because there is a kind of determination. But, you know, as far as I’m concerned, this is a general characteristic of our generation. Because I grew up in an environment where everyone was more or less determined in one way or another. There were certain anomalies – eccentrics, visionaries, – but if you adopted that kind of position, you were immediately marginalized. For all that I strove to leave that behind, I still feel, I suppose, the attraction of determinism. But that’s not a school of architecture, it’s a school of life, I would say.
But still, it has been embodied in architecture.

Yes, perhaps it has been embodied in some way. How interesting is this from the point of view of providing a contrast with foreign architecture?

Well, the Moscow school of architecture has some attractive features.
Yes, there are even Russophile fans in the West. They’re fond of developing countries – Z imbabwe, for example. And us too.

It seems to me that the contextualist approach is not Zimbabwe, at any rate. Let’s get back to our theme. Do you acknowledge yourself as author of this approach?
No – well, of course, I’m not the author. I can tell you the story of my career. When I was 14, my brother – who was about to enter VGIK [the Russian National Institute of Cinematography] to study cameramanship – introduced me to a photographer. This was the end of the 1950s, and his Christian name was Yurik; I don’t remember his surname. It was February, the end of winter, a wonderful time of year with snow and sunshine, and he took my brother and me to see some amazing places. The objective was to show my brother some natural locations. We visited Krutitskoe podvor’e, the Simonov Monastery, and Novospassky. At the end of the 50s this was where Moscow ended; there was no continuation of the embankment; it was not at all an urban setting. Then we visited Donskoy Monastery with its bas-reliefs from the Church of Christ the Saviour. This was the kind of thing that no one in Moscow was interested in, with the exception of rare eccentrics such as this photographer. And I was fascinated. Then at college I had several exotic friends. In our circle it was considered the done thing to like courtyards that could be used as through passages: we competed with each other as to who knew more and who could get to a given destination by the strangest routes. This was a special kind of urban subculture. And then I became a friend of Aleksey Gutnov, who is considered to be the author of the contextualist approach. In the 1960s he was working on cities of the future. This was the age of the NER [New Settlement Element] project; but then the ‘time machine’ suddenly broke down. This happened sometime at the beginning of the 1970s. Until then everyone had been interested in the future, but now the past was suddenly in fashion. We continued to go through the motions of thinking about the future, but somehow decided that we should retreat into the past, study it in more depth… And two years later, it suddenly transpired that we were no longer sketching cities of the future but strange things in historical Moscow. This was interesting purely from the artistic point of view. For the contrast involved: the old urban flesh with new forms imposed on it. By the mid 1980s, when ulitsa Arbat in Moscow had already been turned into a pedestrian street, this became a locus communis. Subsequently we all became members of Pamyat’ [a society whose Russian name means ‘Memory’]. It’s amazing really how everyone started to turn in this direction, although at the end of the 1960s it had seemed a heresy. People who had shouted “We’ll destroy this old rubbish without losing any more time!” now became the main lovers of the past. In Russia, though, it’s the done thing sincerely and enthusiastically to follow the main line, however much the latter winds from side to side – and not only in architecture. You can see the same thing happening at the present moment.

So it was several people around Gutnov who adopted and invented this change of direction.
Yes. Several people. As I see it, apart from Gutnov, there were Sergey Telyatnikov, Andrey Bokov, and Andrey Baburov. As for Gutnov himself, he was their intellectual leader. He was the first to voice the principal ideas.

You said you were interested in the contrast between old urban tissue and new implantations. So the basis was an artistic, plastic image – an opposition between two temporal textures. A purely plastic image. I understand, of course, just how majestic is the figure of Gutnov; he’s a genius of urban planning. But when you read him, you can’t help having the feeling that he doesn’t very much care how things look. Structures, flows, hubs, framework, tissue, plasma – these are all metaphors for particular interior processes which can take a variety of external forms. But you’re talking specifically about plastic shape.
Yes. I’ll go further still: Gutnov was not artistically talented. He was a leader, he had intuition, and he declared this to be the main direction in which to look. He could have been a leader in whatever field he chose. In politics or science. We were lucky it was architecture he chose.

But in the case of what was created in the 1990s, in the Ostozhenka district of Moscow, it was this plasticism that was important.
I suppose so. It’s always the case that, to begin with, you get a statement of the essence of an idea; then this idea is clarified; and then it is vulgarized and becomes something rather repellent.

Wait a moment. You’re taking things too fast. Let’s talk some more about the essence of this approach – we’ll get on to its vulgarization later. After all, your Ostozhenka lay on the path from the declaration of this idea to its vulgarization.
No, you can’t say that, that’s completely wrong. I’m categorically against this formulation: I never created Ostozhenka. What did we do? At the end of the 80s we formulated certain rules as to how to behave in this district. Simple rules such as ‘When entering, wipe your feet. Wash your hands before eating.’ And these rules were sufficient to introduce an element of reason into the development of the area – even if they were only observed a third of the time, at best. And the district of Ostozhenka became a ‘showcase for the achievements of Russian capitalism’. But no more than this. But the idea that this was conceived by Skokan or byuro Ostozenka is not even a myth; it’s nonsense.

I spend my whole time trying to say that the translation of ideas into real architectural forms is a complex process. Old tissue and new architecture are incommensurable with one another. But you’ve found a way of combining them.
We looked for a way. We worked on the premise that the historical environment is valuable because it consists of many layers. This is a given. The development plan for Ostozhenka which we produced at the end of the 1980s is based on restoration of all the historical boundaries of the land plots. At the time we were laughed at: “You’re not seriously proposing to restore the old plots?” That wasn’t what we were proposing, but for us the original parcelling was a kind of spatial dimensionality, a local grid. This is the main thing that we did. Then it emerged that if you draw a plan that picks up these incidental, but already existent contours, this line – then everything can be made to fit. You get a grid, something like scaled paper – but only for the plot in question. It would be possible to draw whatever you like on this grid. If your brief is to design housing, then you use one set of lines; if it’s for a pedestrian zone, then you use another set. But whatever lines you take, you always pick up what has already existed.

And this was your method. A method which can be learned, repeated, and which is the distinctive content of contextualist Modernism. There’s nothing incidental here: each line follows a trace made by the past.
There’s another aspect. This is a fine illustration of the thesis of the transformation of quantity into quality. When Constructivist buildings began to appear in this archaic Moscow in the 1920s – think of Velikovsky’s Gostorg on Myasnitskaya or Corbusier’s Tsentrosoyuz, – this was wonderful. Because, given such a large mass of old buildings, this made for a keenly felt contrast. But gradually the urban tissue in which all this was being inserted wore thin. And at a certain moment it suddenly transpired that a critical point had been reached. One day, comparatively recently, I was approached with a request to design a building on the site of a health centre which had burnt down, at the beginning of Ostozhenka. I refused because I realized that I have no wish to see any modern architecture in this location. Not by me, nor by Skuratov – not by anyone; and designing old-style architecture is not for me. Before our very eyes the city’s flesh has become extenuated; nothing is left. It’s strange, even. Here’s what I think: from the point of view of good architecture there are things that you cannot do – stylization or Classicism, for instance. But on the other hand, the city’s flesh is already so dilapidated that modern forms evoke only revulsion. The context can no longer take it. Or has already been unable to take it. In Moscow so much has happened that talk of context seems too late; there’s already nothing to talk about. What context!

You sound very disappointed. A school has been created, and you’re crossing it out.
It’s my honest opinion. I can’t say I like anything on Ostozhenka – whether designed by us or anyone else. Recently, we made a film. Andrey Gozak and I attached cameras to our heads and walked the entire length of Ostozhenka. It’s a ghetto. There are no people – just security guards in black suits with wires in their ears – that’s all you can see. Wealthy people buy real estate simply to make a profitable investment. They hire security, but don’t actually live there. This is not a city, but a variation on a system of bank safes where money is protected from inflation. So what’s the point of all this architecture, then? Instead of a district with its own face, own distinctive character, and own life, we have nothing. Vacancy of the most expensive kind. You know I have two people inside me. One was born more than 60 years ago in Moscow, on Tverskoy bul’var. The other is an architect who works in today’s Moscow. And I’m often unable to agree with myself. As an ordinary resident of the city, I don’t like what’s going on. I don’t like any of it – that’s what! This is almost a dangerous condition to be in. As an architect, there are things I take pleasure in, but from the point of view of urban life, what’s happening today is a catastrophe. The city is disappearing. And I don’t want to talk about architectural problems when we have this kind of urban life as a background. So we’ve destroyed life, but, on the other hand, have learned how to timber more or less evenly and put pebbles in the right place. These are incommensurable things.

But these two things are not so directly connected.
I don’t know. The essence of the contextualist approach used to be that there is more context than architecture. Context is life, the social life of the city. Without it contextual architecture is by definition incomplete. It’s not architectural monuments that we wanted to create – for them to stand vacant and inspire architectural critics. We were trying to create a space in which to live, and as a result everything has died. But in that case what’s the point of my talking about architecture? Why do I work?

Very well. We’ll consider the contextualist approach to be finished.
It hasn’t finished. It has been transformed into the ideology of the architectural bureaucracy, into a system of planning approvals, and is currently exploited as a basis for corruption. When we conceived all this, it would have been difficult to foresee such a turn of events.

But one way or another, the contextualist approach was the last big idea in our architecture. What now?
Instead of the contextualist approach? I suppose you could say that a kind of  individualization is taking place. There’s no single common tendency. As for me, I will continue doing what I’ve always done. Personally, in whatever situation I’m in, I need reference points. I have to grab hold of something, set some ranging points, establish the dimensionality of the space, the configuration of that in which I am to create. But others will not need this. Some people carry a system of the world with them the whole time; they fetch it out from their heads and start creating. There are such happy people, but I’m not one of them. But in the old days this was the way people worked, the method which people used as an initial impulse, whereas now it is, well, a consequence of my psychic state. That’s individualization for you.

But this leads to loneliness. And incidentally the time when the contextualist approach was developed, Gutnov’s group – this was an intellectually acute context. Are you currently aware of a certain thinning of the intellectual atmosphere?
Oh, yes, of course. The atmosphere of the early 1970s, when we were postgraduate students at the Institute of Theory and History of Architecture – Andrey Bokov, Vladimir Yudintsev, and I – it was a real club! There was Vyacheslav Glazychev, Andrey Baburov, Gutnov would drop in, there were the Slavophiles, Mikhail Kudryavtsev and Gennady Mokeev – all this was stewing in the same pot and, of course, it was great. I don’t know, maybe my pessimism is a matter of age. But on the other hand, we really don’t have any intellectual centres any more. Not the Academy of Architecture, nor the Union of Architecture – they don’t fulfil this role. At that time it was the practice for people to work for something else as well. In addition to their daily job, they had other work. This, incidentally, is a practice you still find in the West. Say, I recently gave a lecture in Bolzano. It’s a tiny town, only 100,000 residents, but it has its own architecture from the time of fascism. It’s very interesting. And there I got to know a local architect, Oswald Zoeggeler. He’s almost my age, maybe a little older. And he’s published a huge monograph on this architecture. Or, say, Paul Shemetov, whom I once met regularly. He wrote a monograph on industrial architecture in Paris – in addition to his main work on urban planning. Why did they do this? Why did we do this at that time? I don’t know. Because Aleksandr Skokan there was this feeling that you had to do something extra. And now it’s gone Well, what I can say? Intellectually, there’s no one I interact with today. There’s no one around me in the profession. It’s a pit.

What would you like to build?
I would like to design buildings for other situations. Not for the city, where everything is very subjective, but for natural surroundings. In the mountains, for instance. I like mountains; I feel euphoria there. I think I know how you should build in the mountains. You need horizontals. In general, I want to attain, well, harmony, if you like. If I were to build in the mountains, I’d want to make sure that it didn’t offend anyone’s gaze. For me the word ‘appropriateness’ is very important, and I would like to be appropriate in these surroundings.

Are you designing anything for Sochi? For the Olympics?
No, I decided not to take part. In Sochi they’ve got it all wrong; nothing good will come of it. I don’t want to take part.

"Embassy House" residential building. Photo by courtesy of "Ostozhenka" Bureau

03 September 2008

Grigory Revzin

Written by:

Grigory Revzin
Headlines now
For All Times
The modular technology combined with the building material of glued wood allows the architectural company Rhizome to create quick-mount hotels (no less!) that are highly rated by the architectural community: last week, the new hotel “Vremena Goda. Igora” scored three awards. Below, we are examining the project in detail.
The Other Way Around
Few awards instead of many, the award ceremony conducted on the first day instead of last, projections instead of sketch boards, trees inside and art objects outside – the renewal of the Architecton festival seemingly took the sure-fire path of turning all the professional traditions upside down – or at least those that happened to be within the scope of the organizers’ attention. There’s certainly a lot to pick on, but the exhibition does feel fresh and improvisational. It looks that pretty soon these guys will set trends for Moscow as well. We shared with you about some elements of the festival in our Telegram channel, and now we are examining the whole thing.
The Chinese Symphony
The construction of the Chinese center “Huaming Park” has been a long story that came to fruition relatively recently. The building is adjacent to a traditional Chinese garden, but it is very modern, laconic and technological, and the simple-in-form, yet spectacular, white lamellae promise to someday be incorporated as a media facade. This complex is also truly multifunctional: it contains different types of living spaces, offices, a large fitness center, conference halls and restaurants – all wrapped in one volume. You can comfortably hold international forums in it, having everything you may possibly need at your fingertips, and going outside only to take a walk. In this article, we are examining this complex in detail.
Ensemble of Individualities
Construction of the first phase of the INDY Towers multifunctional complex on Kuusinen Street, designed by Ostozhenka, has started. The project opens new angles of similarity between the column and the skyscraper, and we examine the nuances and parallels.
Black and Red
Kazakov Grand Loft received its name for a reason: responding to the client’s brief and proceeding from the historical industrial architecture of its immediate surroundings, Valery Kanyashin and Ostozhenka architects proposed a new version of a modern house designed in the fashionable “loft” style. What makes this building different is the fact that the bricks here are dark gray, and the facades of the romantic “fortress” towers blossom with magnificent glazing of the windows in the upper part. The main highlight of the complex, however, is the multiple open air terraces situated on different levels.
Icy Hospitality
Mezonproject has won the national architectural and town planning competition for designing a hotel and a water recreation center in the city of Irkutsk. The architects chose hummocks of Baikal ice as a visual image.
The Mastery of Counterpoint
In the sculpture of Classical Greece, counterpoint was first invented: the ability to position the human body as if it were about to take a step, imbuing it with a hint of the energy of future movement, and with hidden dynamics. For architecture, especially in the 20th century and now, this is also one of the main techniques, and the ATRIUM architects implement it diligently, consistently – and always slightly differently. The new residential complex “Richard” is a good example of such exploration, based on the understanding of contrasts in the urban environment, which was fused into the semblance of a living being.
Countryside Avant-Garde
The project of the museum of Aleksey Gastev, the ideologist of scientific organization of work, located in his hometown of Suzdal, is inscribed in multiple contexts: the contest of a small town, the context of avant-garde design, the context of “lean production”, and the context of the creative quest of Nikolai Lyzlov’s minimalist architecture – and it seems to us that this project even reveals a distant memory of the fact that Aleksey Gastev learned his craft in France.
On the Hills
In the project by Studio 44, the “distributed” IT campus of Nizhny Novgorod is based on well-balanced contracts. Sometimes it is hovering, sometimes undulating, sometimes towering over a rock. For every task, the architects found appropriate form and logic: the hotels are based on a square module, the academic buildings are based on a “flying” one, and so on. Modernist prototypes, specifically, Convent Sainte-Marie de La Tourette, stand next to references to the antique Forum and the tower of a medieval university – as well as next to contextual allusions that help inscribe the buildings of the future campus into the landscape of the city hills with their dominants, high slopes, breathtaking river views, the historical city center, and the Nizhny Novgorod University.
The Magic Carpet
The anniversary exhibition of Totan Kuzembaev’s drawings named “Event Horizons” shows both very old drawings made by the architect in the formative 1980’s, and now extracted from the Museum of Architecture, as well as quite a few pictures from the “Weightlessness” series that Totan Kuzembaev drew specifically for this exhibition in 2023. It seemed to us that the architect represented reality from the point of view of someone levitating in space, and sometimes even upside down, like a magic carpet with multiple layers.
​A Copper Step
Block 5, designed by ASADOV architects as part of the “Ostrov” (“Island”) housing complex, is at the same time grand-scale, conspicuous thanks to its central location – and contextual. It does not “outshout” the solutions used in the neighboring buildings, but rather gives a very balanced implementation of the design code: combining brick and metal in light and dark shades and large copper surfaces, orthogonal geometry on the outside and flexible lines in the courtyard.
The Light for the Island
For the first time around, we are examining a lighting project designed for a housing complex; but then again, the authors of the nighttime lighting of the Ostrov housing complex, UNK lighting, proudly admit that this project is not just the largest in their portfolio, but also the largest in this country. They describe their approach as a European one, its chief principles being smoothness of transitions, comfort to the eye, and the concentration of most of the light at the “bottom” level – meaning, it “works” first of all for pedestrians.
Spots of Light
A new housing complex in Tyumen designed by Aukett Swanke is a very eye-pleasing example of mid-rise construction: using simple means of architectural expression, such as stucco, pitched roofs, and height changes, the architects achieve a “human-friendly” environment, which becomes a significant addition to the nearby park and forest.
Ledges and Swirls
The housing complex “Novaya Zarya” (“New Dawn”) designed by ASADOV Architects will become one of the examples of integrated land development in Vladivostok. The residential area will be characterized by various typologies of its housing sections, and a multitude of functions – in addition to the social infrastructure, the complex will include pedestrian promenades, shopping malls, office buildings, and recreational facilities. The complex is “inscribed” in a relief with a whopping 40-meter height difference, and overlooks the Amur Bay.
Agglomeration on an Island
Recently, an approval came for the master plan of the Yuzhno-Sakhalinsk agglomeration, which was developed by a consortium headed by the Genplan Institute of Moscow. The document provides for the creation of 12 clusters, the totality of which will give the region a qualitative leap in development and make the island more self-sufficient, more accessible, and less dependent on the mainland. We are inviting you to examine the details.
Ivan Grekov: “A client that wants to make a building that is “about architecture” is...
In this article, we are talking to Ivan Grekov, the leader of the architectural company KAMEN (translates as “stone”), the author of many high-profile projects that have been built in Moscow in the recent years, about the history of his company, about different approaches to form making, about different meanings of volume and facade, and about “layers” in working with the environment – at the example of two projects by Osnova Group. These are the MIRAPOLIS complex on the Mira Avenue in Rostokino, whose construction began at the end of last year, and the multifunctional complex in the 2nd Silikatny Proezd on the Zvenigorodsky Highway; recently, it received all the required approvals.
Grasping and Formulating
The special project “Tezisy” (“Abstracts”), showcased at Arch Moscow exhibition in Moscow’s Gostiny Dvor, brought together eight young “rock stars of architecture”, the headliner being Vladislav Kirpichev, founder of the EDAS school. In this article, we share our impressions of the installations and the perspectives of the new generation of architects.
The White Tulip
Currently, there are two relevant projects for the Great Cathedral Mosque in Kazan, which was transferred to a land site in Admiralteiskaya Sloboda in February. One of them, designed by TsLP, was recently showcased at Arch Moscow. In this article, we are covering another project, which was proposed during the same period for the same land site. Its author is Aleksey Ginzburg, the winner of the 2022 competition, but now the project is completely different. Today, it is a sculptural “flower” dome symbolizing a white tulip.
ATRIUM’s Metaverse
The architectural company ATRIUM opened a gallery of its own in a metaverse. Inside, one can examine the company’s approach and main achievements, as well as get some emotional experience. The gallery is already hosting cyberspace business meetings and corporate events.
​From Darkness to Light
Responding to a lengthy list of limitations and a lengthy – by the standards of a small building – list of functions, Vladimir Plotkin turned the project of the Novodevichy Monastery into a light, yet dynamic statement of modern interpretation of historical context, or, perhaps, even interpretation of light and darkness.
Modernism in Avant-Garde
The contest proposal that Studio 44 made for the Krasnoyarsk Opera and Ballet Theater is bright in all senses, and in many ways even provocative – just like a modern theater performance should be. Being in context with modern culture, it even shocks you in some respects. At first, you are amazed at the red color that is present all around, and then you gradually make sense of the picturesque congregation of volumes that share a multitude of functions. And it’s only later that you realize that this conglomerate conceals a modernist building, most of which the architects save intact.
The Black Mountain
The project of reconstructing the Krasnoyarsk Opera and Ballet theater developed by Wowhaus, which won the competition, proposed a total demolition and new construction, as well as considerable expansion (up to 8 floors) – and transformable multifunctional spaces. The new project, however, does retain the recognizable elements and the image of the old theater. As for the main spectator hall, it is turned – figuratively speaking, of course – into a semblance of a black volcano.
Recently, Moscow saw the presentation of a project by Yuri Grigoryan, devoted to turning the truck garage on Novoryazanskaya Street, designed by Konstantin Melnikov, into the Museum of Moscow Transport. The project involves restoring the monument of architecture, adding a new underground floor and a new entrance, as well as a whole park. The implementation is already underway.
Houses by the Lakeside
Approvals came for the project of a housing complex that DNK ag designed in Kazan. The complex is low-rise; its sections are designed as separate volumes united by a common podium. Everything is very much like DNK: delicate and sometimes even lyrical, especially where the yard meets the lakeshore.
Exemplary Adaptation
In Novosibirsk, the construction of a school has been completed, whose project is standing every chance to set a new standard for the nation’s educational institutions. SVESMI Architects and Brusnika company started by developing the brief that would answer the modern teaching practices, and then they proposed the optimum plan, versatile classrooms, and reserved, yet expressive, image in the spirit of this Amsterdam alliance.
Terra Incognita
An 800-room hotel complex, designed by Ginzburg Architects, offers the seaside city of Anapa a fragment of well-organized urban environment that keeps up the cultural spirit of the place. The architects break away from traditional white facades, turning to the antique and even archaic periods of the history of this land, and drawing inspiration in the color of red clay and simple, yet lightweight, shapes.
In Plumage Colors
Working on the facades of a mid-rise residential area in Odintsovsky district, GENPRO architects “adjusted” a number of features of the volumetric composition, which they received without the right to make any changes to, by purely “decorative” means, such as ornamental brickwork, including glazed bricks and the rhythm of the windows. Interestingly, the starting point in the search for the color code was the plumage of birds that are found in the Moscow region.
Julius Borisov: “The “Island” housing complex is a unique project – we took it on with...
One of the largest housing projects of today’s Moscow – the “Ostrov” (“Island”) housing complex built by Donstroy – is now being actively built in the Mnevniky Floodplain. They are planning to build about 1.5M square meters of housing on an area of almost 40 hectares. We are beginning to examine this project– first of all, we are talking to Julius Borisov, the head of the architectural company UNK, which works with most of the residential blocks in this grand-scale project, as well as with the landscaping part; the company even proposed a single design code for the entire territory.
A Balanced Solution
The residential complex “Balance” on Moscow’s Ryazansky Prospekt is one of the large-scale, and relatively economical (again, by Moscow standards) housing projects. Its first phase has already been built and landscaped; the work on the others is in progress. Nevertheless, it has an integral internal logic, which is based on the balance of functions, height, and even image and space composition. The proposed solutions are recognizable and laconic, so that each of them was reduced by the authors to a graphic “logo”. To see everything, you have to flip through the pages and look through to the end.