Sergey Tchoban: “Sports facilities projects are always customized and individual”.

After the completion of FIFA-2018, whose main venue was the reconstructed Luzhniki Stadium, we are speaking to Sergey Tchoban about the specifics of the reconstruction project, as well as about the architect’s attitude towards sports and the subtleties of designing sports facilities.

Interviewed by:
Julia Tarabarina
Translated by:
Anton Mizonov

06 September 2018

Interview

Architect:

Firm:

SPEECH

Object:

Refurbishment of Luzhniki Stadium
Russia, Moscow

Project Team:
General design and planning:Mosinzhproekt Head of project team: Sergey Kuznetsov, chief architect of Moscow Architecture, technology, site plan: SPEECH architectural office Architects in charge: Sergei Tchoban, Alexey Shubkin, Nikolay Gordushin, E.Chernych,A.Fedorov. L. Korneeva, O.Lipis, A.Loginova, S.Lozhkina, E.Medvedeva, E.Serova Structural engineering and engineering: OOO Metropolis Graphic Design: Art Lebedev Studio Glass: AGC Glass production: AKMA Facade set up: Front Engineering

2013 / 2017

Client: KP BSA Luzhniki

Did SPEECH work with the Luzhniki Arena since 2013 or did you plug in later on down the line?

Since 2013. The company “Mosinzhproject” ran a competition for the best designer, and we won it. Further on, under the supervision of Moscow’s building complex, the main architect of the city and the already-mentioned “Mosinzhproject” we did the sections entitled “Architecture”, “Technology”, “Master Plan”, and also conducted the author supervision over the implementation of the project of refurbishing the Luzhniki Stadium. In addition, it was SPEECH that did the reconstruction of Luzhniki infrastructure projects – totally, there were 16 of them. Among these were cash offices, entrance and service pavilions, checkpoints, training fields with spectator stalls, a children’s sports zone, and a service center for street sports.

The description of your project mentions the fact that you preserved the mold of the roof. What about the roof itself – is it new?

The roof is the same as it used to be. It was made of polycarbonate, and it remained that way, the only difference being that now we used polycarbonate conforming to the new fire safety requirements G-1. However, according to our project, a marquee was built that provides extra comfort for the spectators both on sunny days and in the rainy weather.

Do I get it right that, in order to optimize the view from the spectator seats and to boost the number of seats up to 81 000, you had to replace everything that was there on the inside, for the sole exception of the outside wall contour? What were the difficulties that you ran into in the course of the working process, and how did you handle them?

Yes, the old stadium did not conform to the FIFA standards. Specifically, it had an insufficient seat capacity, inadequate breadth of the seat rows, as well as an insufficient amount of bathrooms and cafeterias. In addition, too many of the spectator seats had a limited view, and there were too few spectator seats for people of limited mobility. Therefore, the key task of the reconstruction project was, on the one hand, keeping the outward appearance of the stadium as the icon of Russian sports – the historical walls and the roof of the stadium – and, on the other hand, fulfilling all of the FIFA requirements for the square footage and spectator seat capacity. In other words, we had a task of inscribing all of the new functions into the existing geometry. And this in itself was the most difficult challenge of all.

If you remember, in 2013 they even seriously considered a prospect of tearing down the stadium altogether and building a completely new arena in its place – and we must say thank you to Moscow government that this historical building was ultimately preserved. The historical importance of this edifice, this timeless monument to sports, outweighed all the other considerations. And our project was specially developed with a view to prove that fulfilling all of the FIFA requirements was indeed possible within the historical contour of the stadium. At the same time, barring the historical walls and the roof of the stadium, absolutely everything was replaced – it is a 100 percent new stadium on the inside.

The fact that the spectator seats have been moved closer to the field, and that the angle of their elevation is increased, is covered by all the industry media. Is this really the main technical innovation in the implemented project? And, even if it is, what else is technically new?

First of all, we were to leave the elevation level of the field as it was – because of the proximity of the soil water. In order to ensure the required capacity of 81 000 seats and the requirements for areas for various spectator groups, we had to move the seats closer to the field – and we were able to do that at the expense of removing the running and track and field lanes, which used to circle the football field along its perimeter. Instead just one tier of stalls, we designed three tiers, the ring of the middle tier being occupied by skyboxes – a hundred units for 1950 spectators, as well as 300 VIP seats. And in the gap between the upper in the lower stalls, there are 300 seats for people of limited mobility.

The main means of locomotion inside the stadium are cascading stairways, which are separated from the historical wall by an inside street, thanks to which, by the way, the façade of Luzhniki is now perceived not only from the outside but also from the inside. Among other things, the stairways take the spectators to the distribution gallery that runs 23 meters above the ground – this space at the same time serves as a sightseeing platform that commands fine views of the city center and the Moscow City skyscraper business complex.

The graphic design of the frieze on the attic part was done by Artemy Lebedev Studio. Is this your first experience of doing such a collaboration, and how do you evaluate it?

This was our first experience of collaboration, which led to me recommending Artemy Lebedev Studio for two other of our projects. So, yes, this was a positive experience.

The frieze was there all along – as an element that decorated the roof’s outer bearing ring. However, it was made of metallic cassettes, which by 2014 totally fell into decay. The frieze was very far from aesthetically pleasing. However, at the same time it was clear that we couldn’t do without it. And we took quite a long time thinking over the new image of this element and its execution. Ultimately, we came up with this idea to apply perforation, and not just any perforation but the kind that depicts athletes symbolizing various kind of sports, which were related to this stadium, including during the 1980’s Olympics.

***

Did you ever support any sports team or is it that building stadiums is only a matter of architectural art for you?

I was a huge fan of the Russian team at FIFA 2008. They took the bronze medal at the European Championship. I vividly remember us coming to some huge restaurant in Berlin and shouting for our team – I literally lost my voice then. But I don’t have any fave teams, and I am not a fan in the classic sense of this word.

Currently, the architectural community knows really well the Palace of Water Sports, the Dinamo Stadium, the Krasnodar Stadium, and the Big Sports Arena as the climax of the sports facilities that SPEECH has designed. Can I ask you to get back to the very beginning and remember the first sports facility that you ever designed?

It was the Palace of Water Sports in Kazan that was the first sports facility that we designed.

What would you name as the main challenge in working with a large-scale stadium – the construction set, the bright imagery requirements, deconfliction of streams or perhaps something else?

The projects of sports architecture are always customized and individual. If you design an office building, all you know about it is that after it is launched into operation, some renter will move in. Or some renters. And as for sports facilities, they are always designed for some specific team or for some specific event, their schedule, as a rule, being known for years to come. And this is what raises the bar and sets the most ambitious targets for the architects – tasks that have to do with constructive solutions that are meant to work tomorrow just as well as they work today. And, of course, unlike the other functions, a stadium is always about the architecture of big forms. When you design a stadium, you have to make fewer decisions that you have to make once and for all, but these decisions had better be the right ones because they have a high degree of multiplication.

The architecture of the Krasnodar stadium is, let’s say, “latent classical”, very much in the spirit of the 1930’s. The Big Sports Arena, built in the 1950’s, is also quite classical, and in some way they are even resonant with each other. What are we to expect next? A super-modern iconic stadium or would you prefer to work, in the case of new scenarios, in the classic paradigm of the colosseum?

It all depends on the context. Today, the way I see it, we no longer see the approach towards architecture as some sort of a blueprint – I am talking about a situation when an architect comes up with this or that type of a building and then tries to reproduce this pattern in different points of the globe and in different situations. True, there are still such builders out there, but they are few and far between, while modern architects at large pay much more attention to the context in which they do their projects. And it is my personal belief that if we are to think about the next projects, including sports facilities, their image will first of all depend on where they will be situated and for whom they will be designed. In any case, this must be architecture that is thought out and implemented on a high-quality level down to the last detail.

Architect:

Firm:

SPEECH

Object:

06 September 2018

Headlines now

Object

Magnetic Forces

“Krylatskaya 33” is the first large-scale residential complex to appear amidst the 1980s “micro-districts” that harmoniously coexist with the forests, the river, the slopes, and the sports infrastructure. Despite its imposing scale, the architects of Ostozhenka managed to turn the complex into something that can be best described as a “graceful dominant”. First, they designed the complex with consideration for the style and height of the surrounding micro-districts. Second, by introducing a pause in its tallest section, they created compositional tension – right along the urban planning axis of the area.

Interview

Grigory Revzin: “It Was a Bold Statement Made on the Sly. Something Won”

In this article, we discuss the debates surrounding the circus competition and the demolition of the CMEA building with the most renowned architectural critic of our time. A paradox emerges in the process: while nostalgia for the Brezhnev era seems to be in vogue in Russia, a landmark building – the “axis” of the Warsaw Pact – has been sentenced to demolition. Isn’t that strange? We also find out that wow-architecture has made a comeback as a post-COVID trend. However, to make a truly powerful statement, professionals still remain indispensable.

Object

Exposed Concrete

One of the stages of improving a small square in the town of Lermontov was the construction of a skatepark. Entrusting this part of the project to the XSA team, the city gained a 250-meter trick track whose features resemble those of land art objects – unparalleled in Russia in both scale and design. Here’s a look at how the experimental snake run in the foothills of the Caucasus was built.

Object

One Step Closer To the Dream

The challenges of getting all the mandatory approvals, an insufficient budget, and construction site difficulties did not prevent ASADOV Bureau from achieving its main goal in the realization of the school project in the town of Troitsk – taking another step away from outdated notions of educational spaces toward creating a fundamentally new academic environment.

Object

Chalet on the Rock

An Accor hotel in Arkhyz, designed by A.Len, will be situated at the gateway to the resort’s main tourist hubs. The architects reinterpreted the widely popular chalet style while adding an unexpected twist – an unfinished structure preserved on the site. The design team transformed this remnant into an exciting space featuring an open-air pool and a restaurant with panoramic views of the region’s highest mountain ridges.

Interview

Sergey Skuratov: “By and large, the project has been realized in line with the original ideas”

In this issue, we talk to the chief architect of Garden Quarters, looking back at the history and key moments of a project that took 18 years to develop and has now finally been completed. What interests us most are the transformations that the project underwent during construction, and the way the “necessary void” of public space was formed, which turned this remarkable complex into a fragment of a whole new type of urban fabric – not just at the horizontal “street” level but in its vertical structure as well.

Object

A Unique Representative

The recently concluded year 2024 can be considered the year of completion for the “Garden Quarters” residential complex in Moscow’s Khamovniki. This project is well-known and, in many ways, iconic. Rarely does one manage to preserve such a number of original ideas, achieving in the end a kind of urban planning Gesamtkunstwerk. Here is a subjective view from an architecture journalist, with an interview with Sergey Skuratov soon to follow.

Object

Field of Life

The new project by the architectural company PNKB (an acronym for “Design, Research, and Advisory Bureau”), led by Sergey Gnedovsky and Anton Lyubimkin, for the Kulikovo Field Museum is dedicated to the field as a concept in its own right. The field has long been a focus of the museum’s thorough and successful research. Accordingly, the exterior of the new museum building is gentler than that of its predecessor, which was also designed by PNKB and dedicated specifically to the historic battle. Inside, however, the building confidently guides the visitor from a luminous atrium along a spiral path to the field – interpreted here as a field of life.

Object

A Paper Clip above the River

In this article, we talk with Vitaly Lutz from the Genplan Institute of Moscow about the design and unique features of the pedestrian bridge that now links the two banks of the Yauza River in the new cluster of Bauman Moscow State Technical University (MSTU). The bridge’s form and functionality – particularly the inclusion of an amphitheater suspended over the river – were conceived during the planning phase of the territory’s development. Typically, this approach is not standard practice, but the architects advocate for it, referring to this intermediate project phase as the “pre-AGR” stage (AGR stands for Architectural and Urban Planning Approval). Such a practice, they argue, helps define key parameters of future projects and bridge the gap between urban planning and architectural design.

Review

Living in the Architecture of One’s Own Making

Do architects design houses for themselves? You bet! In this article, we are examining a new book by TATLIN publishing house. This book – unprecedented for Russia – features 52 private homes designed and built by contemporary architects for themselves. It includes houses that are famous, even iconic, as well as lesser-known ones; large and small, stylish and eccentric. To some extent, the book reflects the history of Russian architecture over the past 30 years.

Object

A City Block Isoline

Another competition project for a residential complex on the banks of the Volga in Nizhny Novgorod has been prepared by Studio 44. A team of architects led by Ivan Kozhin concluded that using a regular block layout in such a location would be inappropriate and developed a “custom design” approach: a chain of parceled multi-section buildings stretching along the entire embankment. Let’s explore the features and advantages of this unconventional method.

Report

Competition: The Price of Creativity?

Any day now, we’re expecting the results of a competition held by the “Samolet” development group for a plot in Kommunarka. In the meantime, we share the impressions of Editor-in-Chief Julia Tarabarina, who managed to conduct a public talk. Though technically focused on the interaction between developers and architects, the public talk turned into a discussion about the pros and cons of architectural competitions.

Object

Terraced Design

The “River Park” residential complex has confidently and securely shaped the Nagatinsky Backwater shoreline. Featuring a public embankment, elevated courtyards connected by pedestrian bridges, and brick façades, the development invites exploration of its nuanced response to the surrounding context, as well as hints of the architects’ megalithic design thinking.

A Kremlin’s Core and Meteorite Fragments

We continue our coverage of the competition projects for the residential district that the development company GloraX plans to build along the embankment of the Rowing Channel in Nizhny Novgorod. ASADOV Architects approached the concept through a deep dive into local identity, using storytelling to pinpoint a central idea for the design: the master plan and composition are imagined as if a meteorite had struck a “proto-Kremlin”. Sounds weird? Find more details below!

Contest Results

The Volga Regatta

GloraX plans to develop a residential complex spanning 14 hectares along the Volga River in Nizhny Novgorod. The winning design in a closed-door competition, created by GORA Architects, features housing typologies ranging from townhouses to terraced high-rise slabs, a balance of functions, diverse ways of engaging with the water, and even a dedicated island (no less!) for the city residents.

Object

Life Plans

The master plan for the residential district “Prityazheniye” (“Gravity”) in Naberezhnye Chelny was developed by the architectural company A.Len, taking into account the specific urban planning context and partially implemented solutions of the first phase. However, the master plan prioritized its own values: a green framework, a system of focal points, a hierarchy of spaces, and pedestrian priority. After this, the question of what residents will do in their neighborhood simply doesn’t arise.

Object

A New Track

We took a thorough look at D_Station, a railcar repair depot dating back to 1906, recently reconstructed while preserving its century-old industrial structure, upon the project by Sergey Trukhanov and T+T Architects. Though work on the interiors – set to house restaurants and public spaces – is still underway, the building’s exterior already offers plenty to see. Visitors can explore the blend of old and new brickwork, appreciate the architect’s unique interpretation of ruin aesthetics, and enjoy the newly built pedestrian route that connects the Citydel Business Center’s arches to Kazakova Street.

Report

Four Different Surveys

The “Explore the City” competition, organized this year by the Genplan Institute of Moscow, stands out as a pretty unconventional one for the architectural field but aligns perfectly well with the character of urban planning work. The winning project analyzed contemporary residential complexes, combining urban planning insights with a realtor’s perspective to propose a hybrid approach. Other entries explored public centers, motivations for car ownership, and housing vacancy rates. A fifth participant withdrew. Here’s a closer look at the four completed works.

Report

Scheduled Evolution

ASADOV Architects unveiled the EvyCenter pavilion, a microcultural hub for fostering personal growth, organizing workshops, and doing gymnastics. Additionally, this pavilion serves as a prototype for a scalable country house, drawing inspiration from the “Loskutok” project, and constructed from CLT panels in a factory. This marks the beginning of a developer project initiated by the architectural firm (sic!), which is seeking partners to expand both small Evy settlements and even larger Evy cities, which are, according to Andrey Asadov, aimed at fostering the “evolutionary” development of the people who will inhabit them.

Object

The Golden Crown

The concept for a dental clinic in Yekaterinburg, developed by CNTR Studio, revolves around the idea of a “mouth full of gold”: pristine white porcelain stoneware walls are complemented by matte brass details. To avoid an overly literal interpretation, the architects focused on the building’s proportions, skillfully navigating between sunlight requirements and fire safety regulations.

News

Flexibility and Integration

Not long ago, we covered the project for the fourth phase of the ÁLIA residential complex, designed by APEX. Now, we’ve been shown different fence concepts they developed to enclose the complex’s private courtyards, incorporating a variety of public functions. We believe that the sheer fact that the complex’s architects were involved in such a detail as fencing speaks volumes.

Object

A Step Forward

The HIDE residential complex represents a major milestone for ADM architects and their leaders Andrey Romanov and Ekaterina Kuznetsova in their quest for a fresh high-rise aesthetic – one that is flexible and layered, capable of bringing vibrancy to mass and silhouette while shaping form. Over recent years, this approach has become ADM’s “signature style”, with the golden HIDE tower playing a pivotal role in its evolution. Here, we delve into the project’s story, explore the details of the complex’s design, and uncover its core essence.

Object

Gold in the Sands

A new office for a transcontinental company specializing in resource extraction and processing has opened in Dubai. Designed by T+T Architects, masters of creating spaces that are contemporary, diverse, flexible, and original, this project exemplifies their expertise. On the executive floor, a massive brass-clad partition dominates, while layered textures of compressed earth create a contextually resonant backdrop.

Object

Layers and Levels of Flight

This project goes way back – Reserve Union won this architectural competition at the end of 2011, and the building was completed in 2018, so it’s practically “archival”. However, despite being relatively unknown, the building can hardly be considered “dated” and remains a prime example of architectural expression, particularly in the headquarters genre. And it’s especially fitting for an aviation company office. In some ways, it resembles the Aeroflot headquarters at Sheremetyevo but with its own unique identity, following the signature style of Vladimir Plotkin. In this article, we take an in-depth look at the United Aircraft Corporation (UAC) headquarters in the Moscow agglomeration town of Zhukovsky, supplemented by recent photographs from Alexey Naroditsky – a shoot that became only recently possible due to the fact that improvements were finally made in the surrounding area.

Object

Light and Shadow

In this article, we delve into the architectural design of the “Chaika” house by DNK ag architects, which was recently completed in 2023 as part of the collection of signature designs at ZILArt. As is well-known, all the buildings in this complex follow a design code, yet each one is distinct. This particular building stands out not only for its whiteness and minimalism but also for the refined use of a limited number of techniques that, together, create what can confidently be called synergy.

View

Casus Novae

A master plan was developed for a large residential area with a name of “DNS City”, but now that its implementation began, the plan has been arbitrarily reformatted and replaced with something that, while similar on the surface, is actually quite different. This is not the first time such a thing happens, but it’s always frustrating. With permission from the author, we are sharing Maria Elkina’s post.

Report

Treasure Hunting

The GAFA bureau, in collaboration with Tegola and Arkhitail, organized an expedition to the island of Kilpola in Karelia as part of Moskomarkhitektura’s “Open City” festival. There, amidst moss and rocks, the students sought answers to questions like: what is the sacred, where does it dwell, and what sustains it? Assisting the participants in this quest were landscape engineer Evgeny Levin, artist Nicholas Roerich, a moose, and the lack of cellular connection. Here’s how the story unfolded.

Object

Depths of the Earth, Streams of Water

In the Malaya Okhta district, the Akzent building, designed by Stepan Liphart, was constructed. It follows a classic tripartite structure, yet it’s what you might call “hand-drawn”: each façade is unique in its form and details, some of which aren’t immediately noticeable. In this article, we explore the context and, together with the architect, delve into how the form was developed.

Object

Fir Tree Dynamics

The “Airports of Region” holding is planning to build an airport in Karachay-Cherkessia, aiming to make the Arkhyz and Dombay resorts more accessible to travelers. The project that won in an invitation-only competition, submitted by Sergey Nikeshkin’s KPLN, blends natural imagery inspired by the shape of a conifer seed, open-air waiting spaces, majestic large trees, and a green roof elevated on needle-like columns. The result is both nature-inspired and WOW.

Object

A Brick Shell

In the process of designing a clubhouse situated among pine trees in a prestigious suburban area near Moscow, the architectural firm “A.Len” did the façade design part. The combination of different types of brick and masonry correlates with the volumetric and plastique solutions, further enhanced by the inclusion of wood-painted fragments and metal “glazing”.

​Sergey Tchoban: “Sports facilities projects are always customized and individual”.

After the completion of FIFA-2018, whose main venue was the reconstructed Luzhniki Stadium, we are speaking to Sergey Tchoban about the specifics of the reconstruction project, as well as about the architect’s attitude towards sports and the subtleties of designing sports facilities.

Sergey Tchoban: “Sports facilities projects are always customized and individual”.