The Story of Apraksin Dvor

The Forgotten Place

Many cities have places in them, whose current state is at desperate odds with their potential, and Saint Petersburg in this sense is no exception – the vivid example of that is Konyushenny Dvor or Apraksin Dvor, which forms a gigantic complex with a total area of about 13 hectares, together with the adjacent Shchukin Dvor, aka Mariinski Market. Situated ridiculously close to the city center, next to the Nevsky Prospect, it has been for years falling into decay, putting on outlaw annexes, garish shop signs, and other marks of “wild-growing” environmental design: a huge marketplace from the 1990’s that in fact occupies a cultural heritage building – yes, this place formally received the appropriate status in 1993.

The situation, however, is beginning to improve – to a large extent, thanks to the perseverance of “Studio 44”, whose unflagging professional enthusiasm has been helping the architects for decades to put together the puzzle of the owners’ and renters’ interests, deal with the lack of financing, and the absence of the social need for the change.

zooming — Renovation and reorganization to fit modern functions of the regional cultural heritage site "Apraksin Dvor with the Mariinsky Market" © Studio 44

The Eternal Market

The rectangle of Apraksin and Shchukin Dvors is the largest marketplace of the early XIX century, most of these Saint Petersburg markets being grouped around the Sadovaya Street: nearby, one will also find the Morskoy, Sennoy, Nikolsky markets, and, of course, the Gostiny Dvor (the current project of the reconstruction of which, by the way, was also developed by “Studio 44”). All these markets are essentially shopping arcades, the satellites of the development of the capitalist industry, and the once-centers of the economic development. From the XVI to XIX century, their place has always been in the center of the city.

The typology of shopping arcades is determined by their function and thus has remained almost unchanged for centuries: the arcades running alongside the perimeter of the building before the entrances to the shops, offices on the second floors, and storage spaces in the middle. If the courtyard was a big one, it would also get inside shopping streets. If a simpler structure was designed to become the shopping arcade, a city market that just consisted of rows of counters, the construction was done in stages. As the tradesmen would grow richer and quite often in order to eliminate the fire hazard, the wooden pavilions were replaced by stone ones, the general layout being still preserved.

This is how Apraksin Dvor and Shchukin Dvor developed from the mid XVIII century to the late XIX century. At different times, their buildings were handled by numerous architects, some of them being the famous ones, from Eropkin and Korobov to Lidval. By 1917, Apraksin Dvor was arguably the largest market in Europe: over 40 buildings and about 650 shops, sales of furs, broadcloth, groceries, fruits, tea, wine, and more.

After the October Revolution 2017, the shops continued working; the fruit market and the small trade also survived. A different fate was prepared for the land site stretching along the Fontanka River, this land never really belonging to the market anyway: they demolished the Voskresenskaya Church here, replacing it with the building of Lenizdat in 1964, which joined the printing house that already was there. Nearby, again, on the Fontanka waterfront, stands the Tovstonogov Bolshoi Drama Theater, which is in fact the heir of the Count Apraksin Theater; in the XX century, it got a few office buildings that blocked the market’s connection to the waterfront.

In the 1990’s, the buildings of “Aprashka” (as people of Saint Petersburg call it) was privatized and partially reconstructed to fit the new owners’ tastes, the lacunae having been filled with small retail shops, without any detailed plan or project.

This is how the expensive marketplace of the ripe capitalism of the XIX century turned into the cheapest place of the city of the XXI century. Choosing between the pleasures of civilized trade and the inexpensive rent of ruined hazard-state premises, the city people opted for the latter. The complex almost fell into a state of “shopping slums”; it is enough to pass it by walking down the Sadovaya Street to feel the unmistakable smell.

The Background

“Studio 44” launched its first project in the late 1980’s. The period of the history of “Aprashka” started in the mid 2000’s from a string of “star” international competitions. The year of 2007 saw a competition of developer companies for the right to reconstruct and develop Apraksin Dvor. Three companies were vying for this right: OOO “Glavstroy” owned by the billionaire Oleg Deripaska; Russian Land, headed by Shalva Chigirinsky, and the Swedish RURIC AB. Each of the three developers came forward with an architectural proposal of their own. Chigirinsky ordered his concept to Norman Foster, RURIC AB – to Nikita Yavein’s “Studio 44”, and Glavstroy went as far as to organize an invitation-only competition that included Rem Koolhaas, Chris Wilkinson, MRDV, and PRP Architects. Glavstroy’s inner competition was won by Chris Wilkinson, while RUSSIAN LAND and RURIC joined efforts and put forward Foster against Wilkinson. The ultimate victory was won by the Wilkinson concept, which included tearing down the building of Lenizdat, subsequently replacing it with a hotel; a “hovering” glass roof above the square, and a bridge thrown over the Fontanka River. However, neither the almost 30 billion worth of anticipated investment nor the plans to bring the entire block in order within three years helped the concept to overcome the preservation experts’ skepticism and the consequences of the world economic crisis that stopped many investment projects in Saint Petersburg from being implemented.

The tender of 2013 included Timur Bashkaev architects and “Studio 44”. The victory was won by the Muscovites – Timur Bashkaev proposed the nominal value for the development of the architectural concept as being 200 000 rubles, planning to preserve the historical look of the façades and opt out of developing the underground space altogether. However, even such economy-class variant was to remain on paper – due to the fact that the problems with the private property owners, whose share in the total area of “Aprashka” amounted to 170 000 square meters (almost 30%), were impossible to solve without some “political will” or financing in the amount sufficient for all these buildings to be bought out by the city from these owners.

While the Moscow concept was still being discussed, another Moscow-based company, Glorax Development, in 2015, ordered “Studio 44” a new version of the concept for developing the Apraksin Dvor and the Shchukin Dvor, in which the designers made good on the criticism, first of all, by decreasing the underground part – in the past, the team of Nikita Yavein proposed to make a four-level underground parking garage underneath the entire territory, and, expanding the set of public functions, turn the former marketplace into a housing project with a large pedestrian area.

After that, also in 2015, the city council created a joint stock company named “Apraksin Dvor”, handing over to it under trust management about 40 000 square meters of Apraksin Dvor and Shchukin Dvor, the part that belonged to the city and was free from the investment contracts. The joint stock company is meant to implement the plans of renovating Apraksin Dvor, preserving the cultural heritage sites, and launching the investment process aimed at adjusting the place for modern use.

In 2017, in order to select the developer of the sketch design project, Apraksin Dvor organized a tender that was won by “Studio 44”. Four months later, in October of 2017, the concept designed by Nikita Yavein was approved by the Council for Protection of Cultural Heritage of Saint Petersburg.

The Fifth Crusade

The concept that was submitted and finally approved by the Council is “Studio 44”’s fourth attempt to radically change the situation with one of the largest architectural ensembles of the center of Saint Petersburg that has for decades been falling into decay. Such perseverance and faithfulness to the chosen cause is nothing but amazing. Participating in contests, full-scale survey, analysis of each of the buildings, development of engineering and construction solutions for the ruined infrastructure, negotiations with the city authorities and property owners, round after round, without any external financing, solely at the company’s expense… One will hardly remember any other examples of such “crusades” in the history of modern Russian architecture.

Principles and Methods

The current proposal by “Studio 44” is not so much a project as a whole new program of functional and town-planning reorganization of the territory and turning it into a full-fledged city block with developed infrastructure worthy of being a neighbor of the Nevsky Prospect. People will live and work here; they will be able to do some shopping, go to a theater performance or an art exhibition.

“We developed several principles of renovating this complex, which guarantee the preservation of the historical heritage, at the same time creating a maximally comfortable and efficient infrastructure of a modern city block” – shares Nikita Yavein.

1. A pedestrian city

The historical network of driveways 4 to 8 meters wide is not fit for full-fledged city traffic. The optimum solution in this case would be to organize a totally pedestrian zone with a possibility of special vehicles driving in, should such need arise. The territory of “Apraksin Dvor” can in fact turn into one of the largest pedestrian zones of Saint Petersburg.

2. Developed underground space

The project continues and develops the basements of the existing buildings. The only underground floor serves for the loading of the shops and cafes, and provides a driving access to houses and shops that can only be accessed from underground, as well as to a limited-size parking garage for 441–757 parking places, depending on the adopted scenario and financial situation. In the special channels of the underground level, communications will be laid, which will facilitate their repair work.

3. An inhabited town

The upper levels of the shop buildings become residential ones, which makes it possible to get rid of the “endless marketplace” and looks more like a medieval guild town with the owners’ residences situated above their shops, which will be the perfect solution for the small business, for example, an antiques store, a doctor’s office or a legal firm. Currently, several developers and realtors already confirmed the popularity of such kind of real estate at the market of Saint Petersburg.

The architects tried to find a balance between the retail, public, and residential functions. It often happens that a popular cafe or club turns the life of the upper floor residents into a living hell. For this reason, the project provides for “quiet” streets – residential ones, with a minimum public function – and “loud” ones. The amount of residential premises, including apartment hotels, regular hotels and hostels is approximately equal the sum total of the public spaces: shops, cafes, offices, coworking spaces, services, sport clubs, museums, exhibition halls, and cultural centers.

4. Multifunctional

The tilt towards creative industries and travel service is not so much homage to fashion or hopping on the bandwagon but the result of the survey of the market situation: these directions were to help to achieve steady popularity of the residential and nob-residential spaces and buildings.

In addition, the architects though that it would be a waste not to take the advantage of the proximity of the Tovstonogov Bolshoi Drama Theater and the Vaganova Academy of Russian Ballet, allotting for the theater, musical, and art spaces a few buildings on the Fontanka side. This place will also host the experimental stage of the Tovstonogov Bolshoi Drama Theater, for which buildings 50 and 51 will be remodeled. In order to preserve the historical look of the buildings, the spectator hall will be placed in their reconstructed mutual yard. However, this experimental stage is the only example of the architects' “intrusion” into the historical city fabric.

5. Preservation

“We don’t tear anything down and we virtually don’t build anything new” – Nikita Yavein says. The cover of the sketch project bears the name of “restoration”. This term is, of course, applied to the historical buildings, and not to the later chaotic additions and other attributes of the "marketplace" period in “Aprashka”’s history. On the basis of the earlier conducted survey, the architects drew up a passport of condition and expected work on every (!) building, with a list of all the changes that took place in its appearance, and a detailed description of restoration work – this work includes, among other things, opening of the bricked-up window apertures, bricking up the “spontaneous” or “outlaw” windows and doors, and recreation of façade elements. The architects are also planning to recreate the обходных галерей on the second floor. Without this high degree of detailing and participation of the owners of buildings and premises, the project would have been doomed to follow into the footsteps of its predecessors

Tactics and Strategy

The architects got rid of illusions – for the single exception of their faith in a happy ending - and came up with a sustainable concept, implementable under virtually any conditions that can possibly come up in this country. First of all, the volumes of investment from the city budget are minimized. The city is expected to finance the construction of the underground part, and that, according to the most approximate estimates, is about 6-10 billion rubles. Given the conditions of the raging budget crisis, one can hardly count on blitz reconstruction a-la Moscow’s “My Street” program, and the concept provides for not just one but several scenarios: from minimum to maximum development of the underground space, in a comprehensive way or in several stages, defending on the resources of the management company.

Based on the negative experience of past attempts to attract a large investor, the architects started working with the owners of individual buildings or blocks, refraining from accumulating too much real property in one hands (more information on the owners of “Aprashka” is available here). It is obvious that for the owners the renovation is fraught with the necessity of some serious reorganization of their work and investments but at the same time a lot of them realize that the current state cannot last forever, while their active participation in the process puts them in a more advantageous position.

The concept provides for the “seizure”-type of renovation, which will consist in concluding contracts with each of the owners, for whom the company prepares an exhaustive pool of information necessary for devising a business plan, which will be instrumental for involving the owners in the renovation process. Currently, a few projects developed by “Studio 44” are getting all the mandatory approvals. A few more contracts are also on the way.

According to the estimates made by the authors of the concept, the step-by-step renovation of the entire complex will take up a few decades. However, for now, the architects find it important to get the process started. And there is no doubt that each new renovated building, each new fragment of the historical ensemble, will go a long way to attract new investors, which means that there is a fair chance of seeing one day the entire “Apraksin Dvor” come alive, and, who knows, maybe even renting a mansard for a week or so to immerse in the true Saint Petersburg atmosphere in the heart of this magnificent city.

05 June 2018

Written by:
Elena Petukhova
Translated by:
Anton Mizonov

Headlines now

Review

Living in the Architecture of One’s Own Making

Do architects design houses for themselves? You bet! In this article, we are examining a new book by TATLIN publishing house. This book – unprecedented for Russia – features 52 private homes designed and built by contemporary architects for themselves. It includes houses that are famous, even iconic, as well as lesser-known ones; large and small, stylish and eccentric. To some extent, the book reflects the history of Russian architecture over the past 30 years.

Object

A City Block Isoline

Another competition project for a residential complex on the banks of the Volga in Nizhny Novgorod has been prepared by Studio 44. A team of architects led by Ivan Kozhin concluded that using a regular block layout in such a location would be inappropriate and developed a “custom design” approach: a chain of parceled multi-section buildings stretching along the entire embankment. Let’s explore the features and advantages of this unconventional method.

Report

Competition: The Price of Creativity?

Any day now, we’re expecting the results of a competition held by the “Samolet” development group for a plot in Kommunarka. In the meantime, we share the impressions of Editor-in-Chief Julia Tarabarina, who managed to conduct a public talk. Though technically focused on the interaction between developers and architects, the public talk turned into a discussion about the pros and cons of architectural competitions.

Object

Terraced Design

The “River Park” residential complex has confidently and securely shaped the Nagatinsky Backwater shoreline. Featuring a public embankment, elevated courtyards connected by pedestrian bridges, and brick façades, the development invites exploration of its nuanced response to the surrounding context, as well as hints of the architects’ megalithic design thinking.

A Kremlin’s Core and Meteorite Fragments

We continue our coverage of the competition projects for the residential district that the development company GloraX plans to build along the embankment of the Rowing Channel in Nizhny Novgorod. ASADOV Architects approached the concept through a deep dive into local identity, using storytelling to pinpoint a central idea for the design: the master plan and composition are imagined as if a meteorite had struck a “proto-Kremlin”. Sounds weird? Find more details below!

Contest Results

The Volga Regatta

GloraX plans to develop a residential complex spanning 14 hectares along the Volga River in Nizhny Novgorod. The winning design in a closed-door competition, created by GORA Architects, features housing typologies ranging from townhouses to terraced high-rise slabs, a balance of functions, diverse ways of engaging with the water, and even a dedicated island (no less!) for the city residents.

Object

Life Plans

The master plan for the residential district “Prityazheniye” (“Gravity”) in Naberezhnye Chelny was developed by the architectural company A.Len, taking into account the specific urban planning context and partially implemented solutions of the first phase. However, the master plan prioritized its own values: a green framework, a system of focal points, a hierarchy of spaces, and pedestrian priority. After this, the question of what residents will do in their neighborhood simply doesn’t arise.

Object

A New Track

We took a thorough look at D_Station, a railcar repair depot dating back to 1906, recently reconstructed while preserving its century-old industrial structure, upon the project by Sergey Trukhanov and T+T Architects. Though work on the interiors – set to house restaurants and public spaces – is still underway, the building’s exterior already offers plenty to see. Visitors can explore the blend of old and new brickwork, appreciate the architect’s unique interpretation of ruin aesthetics, and enjoy the newly built pedestrian route that connects the Citydel Business Center’s arches to Kazakova Street.

Report

Four Different Surveys

The “Explore the City” competition, organized this year by the Genplan Institute of Moscow, stands out as a pretty unconventional one for the architectural field but aligns perfectly well with the character of urban planning work. The winning project analyzed contemporary residential complexes, combining urban planning insights with a realtor’s perspective to propose a hybrid approach. Other entries explored public centers, motivations for car ownership, and housing vacancy rates. A fifth participant withdrew. Here’s a closer look at the four completed works.

Report

Scheduled Evolution

ASADOV Architects unveiled the EvyCenter pavilion, a microcultural hub for fostering personal growth, organizing workshops, and doing gymnastics. Additionally, this pavilion serves as a prototype for a scalable country house, drawing inspiration from the “Loskutok” project, and constructed from CLT panels in a factory. This marks the beginning of a developer project initiated by the architectural firm (sic!), which is seeking partners to expand both small Evy settlements and even larger Evy cities, which are, according to Andrey Asadov, aimed at fostering the “evolutionary” development of the people who will inhabit them.

Object

The Golden Crown

The concept for a dental clinic in Yekaterinburg, developed by CNTR Studio, revolves around the idea of a “mouth full of gold”: pristine white porcelain stoneware walls are complemented by matte brass details. To avoid an overly literal interpretation, the architects focused on the building’s proportions, skillfully navigating between sunlight requirements and fire safety regulations.

News

Flexibility and Integration

Not long ago, we covered the project for the fourth phase of the ÁLIA residential complex, designed by APEX. Now, we’ve been shown different fence concepts they developed to enclose the complex’s private courtyards, incorporating a variety of public functions. We believe that the sheer fact that the complex’s architects were involved in such a detail as fencing speaks volumes.

Object

A Step Forward

The HIDE residential complex represents a major milestone for ADM architects and their leaders Andrey Romanov and Ekaterina Kuznetsova in their quest for a fresh high-rise aesthetic – one that is flexible and layered, capable of bringing vibrancy to mass and silhouette while shaping form. Over recent years, this approach has become ADM’s “signature style”, with the golden HIDE tower playing a pivotal role in its evolution. Here, we delve into the project’s story, explore the details of the complex’s design, and uncover its core essence.

Object

Gold in the Sands

A new office for a transcontinental company specializing in resource extraction and processing has opened in Dubai. Designed by T+T Architects, masters of creating spaces that are contemporary, diverse, flexible, and original, this project exemplifies their expertise. On the executive floor, a massive brass-clad partition dominates, while layered textures of compressed earth create a contextually resonant backdrop.

Object

Layers and Levels of Flight

This project goes way back – Reserve Union won this architectural competition at the end of 2011, and the building was completed in 2018, so it’s practically “archival”. However, despite being relatively unknown, the building can hardly be considered “dated” and remains a prime example of architectural expression, particularly in the headquarters genre. And it’s especially fitting for an aviation company office. In some ways, it resembles the Aeroflot headquarters at Sheremetyevo but with its own unique identity, following the signature style of Vladimir Plotkin. In this article, we take an in-depth look at the United Aircraft Corporation (UAC) headquarters in the Moscow agglomeration town of Zhukovsky, supplemented by recent photographs from Alexey Naroditsky – a shoot that became only recently possible due to the fact that improvements were finally made in the surrounding area.

Object

Light and Shadow

In this article, we delve into the architectural design of the “Chaika” house by DNK ag architects, which was recently completed in 2023 as part of the collection of signature designs at ZILArt. As is well-known, all the buildings in this complex follow a design code, yet each one is distinct. This particular building stands out not only for its whiteness and minimalism but also for the refined use of a limited number of techniques that, together, create what can confidently be called synergy.

View

Casus Novae

A master plan was developed for a large residential area with a name of “DNS City”, but now that its implementation began, the plan has been arbitrarily reformatted and replaced with something that, while similar on the surface, is actually quite different. This is not the first time such a thing happens, but it’s always frustrating. With permission from the author, we are sharing Maria Elkina’s post.

Report

Treasure Hunting

The GAFA bureau, in collaboration with Tegola and Arkhitail, organized an expedition to the island of Kilpola in Karelia as part of Moskomarkhitektura’s “Open City” festival. There, amidst moss and rocks, the students sought answers to questions like: what is the sacred, where does it dwell, and what sustains it? Assisting the participants in this quest were landscape engineer Evgeny Levin, artist Nicholas Roerich, a moose, and the lack of cellular connection. Here’s how the story unfolded.

Object

Depths of the Earth, Streams of Water

In the Malaya Okhta district, the Akzent building, designed by Stepan Liphart, was constructed. It follows a classic tripartite structure, yet it’s what you might call “hand-drawn”: each façade is unique in its form and details, some of which aren’t immediately noticeable. In this article, we explore the context and, together with the architect, delve into how the form was developed.

Object

Fir Tree Dynamics

The “Airports of Region” holding is planning to build an airport in Karachay-Cherkessia, aiming to make the Arkhyz and Dombay resorts more accessible to travelers. The project that won in an invitation-only competition, submitted by Sergey Nikeshkin’s KPLN, blends natural imagery inspired by the shape of a conifer seed, open-air waiting spaces, majestic large trees, and a green roof elevated on needle-like columns. The result is both nature-inspired and WOW.

Object

A Brick Shell

In the process of designing a clubhouse situated among pine trees in a prestigious suburban area near Moscow, the architectural firm “A.Len” did the façade design part. The combination of different types of brick and masonry correlates with the volumetric and plastique solutions, further enhanced by the inclusion of wood-painted fragments and metal “glazing”.

Report

Word Forms

ATRIUM architects love ambitious challenges, and for the firm’s thirtieth anniversary, they boldly play a game of words with an exhibition that dives deep into a self-created vocabulary. They immerse their projects – especially art installations – into this glossary, as if plunging into a current of their own. You feel as if you’re flowing through the veins of pure art, immersed in a universe of vertical cities, educational spaces – of which the architects are true masters – and the cultural codes of various locations. But what truly captivates is the bold statement that Vera Butko and Anton Nadtochy make, both through their work and this exhibition: architecture, above all, is art – the art of working with form and space.

Object

Flexibility and Acuteness of Modernity

Luxurious, fluid, large “kokoshniks” and spiral barrel columns, as if made from colorful chewing gum: there seem to be no other mansion like this in Moscow, designed in the “Neo-Russian-Modern” style. And the “Teremok” on Malaya Kaluzhskaya, previously somewhat obscure, has “come alive with new colors” and gained visibility after its restoration for the office of the “architectural ecosystem” as the architects love to call themselves. It’s evident that Julius Borisov and the architects at UNK put their hearts into finding this new office and bringing it up to date. Let’s delve into the paradoxes of this mansion’s history and its plasticity. Spoiler: two versions of modernity meet here, both balancing on the razor’s edge of “what’s current”.

Interview

Yuri Vissarionov: “A modular house does not belong to the land”

It belongs to space, or to the air... It turns out that 3D printing is more effective when combined with a modular approach: the house is built in a workshop and then adapted to the site, including on uneven terrain. Yuri Vissarionov shares his latest experience in designing tourist complexes, both in central Russia and in the south. These include houseboats, homes printed from lightweight concrete using a 3D printer, and, of course, frame houses.

Object

Moscow’s First

“The quality of education largely depends on the quality of the educational environment”. This principle of the last decade has been realized by Sergey Skuratov in the project for the First Moscow Gymnasium on Rostovskaya Embankment in the Khamovniki district. The building seamlessly integrates into the complex urban landscape, responding both to the pedestrian flow of the city and the quiet alleyways. It skillfully takes advantage of the height differences and aligns with modern trends in educational space design. Let’s take a closer look.

Object

Looking at the Water

The site of Villa Sonata stretches from the road to the water’s edge, offering its own shoreline, pier, and a picturesque river panorama. To reveal these sweeping views, Roman Leonidov “cut” the façade diagonally parallel to the river, thus getting two main axes for the house and, consequently, “two heads”. The internal core – two double-height spaces, a living room and a conservatory, with a “bridge” above them – makes the house both “transparent” and filled with light.

Object

The White Wing

Well, it’s not exactly white. It’s more of a beige, white-stone structure that plays with the color of limestone – smoother surfaces are lighter, while rougher ones are darker. This wing unites various elements: it absorbs and interprets the surrounding themes. It responds to everything, yet maintains a cohesive expression – a challenging task! – while also incorporating recognizable features of its own, such as the dynamic cuts at the bottom, top, and middle.

Object

Urban Dunes

The XSA Ramps team designed and built a three-part sports hub for a park in Rostov-on-Don, welcoming people of all ages and fitness levels. The skate plaza, pump track, and playground are all meticulously crafted with details that attract a diverse range of visitors. The technical execution of the shapes and slopes transforms this space into a kind of sculptural composition.

Object

Proportional Growth

The project for the fourth phase of the ÁLIA residential area has been announced. The buildings are situated on an elongated plot – almost a “ray” that shoots out from the center of the area towards the river. Their layout reflects both a response to Moscow’s architectural preferences over the past 15 years, shifting “from blocks to towers”, and an interpretation of the neighboring business park designed by SOM. Additionally, the best apartments here are not located at the very top but closer to the middle, forming a glowing “waistline”.

Object

The “Staircase” Building

In designing the “Details” residential complex in New Moscow, Rais Baishev spiced up the now-popular Moscow theme of a “courtyard” building with an idea drawn from the surrealist drawings by Maurits Escher. He envisioned the stepped silhouettes and descending slopes as a metaphysical mega-staircase, creating a key void within the courtyard that gave the project an internal “spine”. This concept is felt both in the building’s silhouette and on its façades.

​The Story of Apraksin Dvor

The Story of Apraksin Dvor