The Story of Apraksin Dvor

The Forgotten Place

Many cities have places in them, whose current state is at desperate odds with their potential, and Saint Petersburg in this sense is no exception – the vivid example of that is Konyushenny Dvor or Apraksin Dvor, which forms a gigantic complex with a total area of about 13 hectares, together with the adjacent Shchukin Dvor, aka Mariinski Market. Situated ridiculously close to the city center, next to the Nevsky Prospect, it has been for years falling into decay, putting on outlaw annexes, garish shop signs, and other marks of “wild-growing” environmental design: a huge marketplace from the 1990’s that in fact occupies a cultural heritage building – yes, this place formally received the appropriate status in 1993.

The situation, however, is beginning to improve – to a large extent, thanks to the perseverance of “Studio 44”, whose unflagging professional enthusiasm has been helping the architects for decades to put together the puzzle of the owners’ and renters’ interests, deal with the lack of financing, and the absence of the social need for the change.

zooming — Renovation and reorganization to fit modern functions of the regional cultural heritage site "Apraksin Dvor with the Mariinsky Market" © Studio 44

The Eternal Market

The rectangle of Apraksin and Shchukin Dvors is the largest marketplace of the early XIX century, most of these Saint Petersburg markets being grouped around the Sadovaya Street: nearby, one will also find the Morskoy, Sennoy, Nikolsky markets, and, of course, the Gostiny Dvor (the current project of the reconstruction of which, by the way, was also developed by “Studio 44”). All these markets are essentially shopping arcades, the satellites of the development of the capitalist industry, and the once-centers of the economic development. From the XVI to XIX century, their place has always been in the center of the city.

The typology of shopping arcades is determined by their function and thus has remained almost unchanged for centuries: the arcades running alongside the perimeter of the building before the entrances to the shops, offices on the second floors, and storage spaces in the middle. If the courtyard was a big one, it would also get inside shopping streets. If a simpler structure was designed to become the shopping arcade, a city market that just consisted of rows of counters, the construction was done in stages. As the tradesmen would grow richer and quite often in order to eliminate the fire hazard, the wooden pavilions were replaced by stone ones, the general layout being still preserved.

This is how Apraksin Dvor and Shchukin Dvor developed from the mid XVIII century to the late XIX century. At different times, their buildings were handled by numerous architects, some of them being the famous ones, from Eropkin and Korobov to Lidval. By 1917, Apraksin Dvor was arguably the largest market in Europe: over 40 buildings and about 650 shops, sales of furs, broadcloth, groceries, fruits, tea, wine, and more.

After the October Revolution 2017, the shops continued working; the fruit market and the small trade also survived. A different fate was prepared for the land site stretching along the Fontanka River, this land never really belonging to the market anyway: they demolished the Voskresenskaya Church here, replacing it with the building of Lenizdat in 1964, which joined the printing house that already was there. Nearby, again, on the Fontanka waterfront, stands the Tovstonogov Bolshoi Drama Theater, which is in fact the heir of the Count Apraksin Theater; in the XX century, it got a few office buildings that blocked the market’s connection to the waterfront.

In the 1990’s, the buildings of “Aprashka” (as people of Saint Petersburg call it) was privatized and partially reconstructed to fit the new owners’ tastes, the lacunae having been filled with small retail shops, without any detailed plan or project.

This is how the expensive marketplace of the ripe capitalism of the XIX century turned into the cheapest place of the city of the XXI century. Choosing between the pleasures of civilized trade and the inexpensive rent of ruined hazard-state premises, the city people opted for the latter. The complex almost fell into a state of “shopping slums”; it is enough to pass it by walking down the Sadovaya Street to feel the unmistakable smell.

The Background

“Studio 44” launched its first project in the late 1980’s. The period of the history of “Aprashka” started in the mid 2000’s from a string of “star” international competitions. The year of 2007 saw a competition of developer companies for the right to reconstruct and develop Apraksin Dvor. Three companies were vying for this right: OOO “Glavstroy” owned by the billionaire Oleg Deripaska; Russian Land, headed by Shalva Chigirinsky, and the Swedish RURIC AB. Each of the three developers came forward with an architectural proposal of their own. Chigirinsky ordered his concept to Norman Foster, RURIC AB – to Nikita Yavein’s “Studio 44”, and Glavstroy went as far as to organize an invitation-only competition that included Rem Koolhaas, Chris Wilkinson, MRDV, and PRP Architects. Glavstroy’s inner competition was won by Chris Wilkinson, while RUSSIAN LAND and RURIC joined efforts and put forward Foster against Wilkinson. The ultimate victory was won by the Wilkinson concept, which included tearing down the building of Lenizdat, subsequently replacing it with a hotel; a “hovering” glass roof above the square, and a bridge thrown over the Fontanka River. However, neither the almost 30 billion worth of anticipated investment nor the plans to bring the entire block in order within three years helped the concept to overcome the preservation experts’ skepticism and the consequences of the world economic crisis that stopped many investment projects in Saint Petersburg from being implemented.

The tender of 2013 included Timur Bashkaev architects and “Studio 44”. The victory was won by the Muscovites – Timur Bashkaev proposed the nominal value for the development of the architectural concept as being 200 000 rubles, planning to preserve the historical look of the façades and opt out of developing the underground space altogether. However, even such economy-class variant was to remain on paper – due to the fact that the problems with the private property owners, whose share in the total area of “Aprashka” amounted to 170 000 square meters (almost 30%), were impossible to solve without some “political will” or financing in the amount sufficient for all these buildings to be bought out by the city from these owners.

While the Moscow concept was still being discussed, another Moscow-based company, Glorax Development, in 2015, ordered “Studio 44” a new version of the concept for developing the Apraksin Dvor and the Shchukin Dvor, in which the designers made good on the criticism, first of all, by decreasing the underground part – in the past, the team of Nikita Yavein proposed to make a four-level underground parking garage underneath the entire territory, and, expanding the set of public functions, turn the former marketplace into a housing project with a large pedestrian area.

After that, also in 2015, the city council created a joint stock company named “Apraksin Dvor”, handing over to it under trust management about 40 000 square meters of Apraksin Dvor and Shchukin Dvor, the part that belonged to the city and was free from the investment contracts. The joint stock company is meant to implement the plans of renovating Apraksin Dvor, preserving the cultural heritage sites, and launching the investment process aimed at adjusting the place for modern use.

In 2017, in order to select the developer of the sketch design project, Apraksin Dvor organized a tender that was won by “Studio 44”. Four months later, in October of 2017, the concept designed by Nikita Yavein was approved by the Council for Protection of Cultural Heritage of Saint Petersburg.

The Fifth Crusade

The concept that was submitted and finally approved by the Council is “Studio 44”’s fourth attempt to radically change the situation with one of the largest architectural ensembles of the center of Saint Petersburg that has for decades been falling into decay. Such perseverance and faithfulness to the chosen cause is nothing but amazing. Participating in contests, full-scale survey, analysis of each of the buildings, development of engineering and construction solutions for the ruined infrastructure, negotiations with the city authorities and property owners, round after round, without any external financing, solely at the company’s expense… One will hardly remember any other examples of such “crusades” in the history of modern Russian architecture.

Principles and Methods

The current proposal by “Studio 44” is not so much a project as a whole new program of functional and town-planning reorganization of the territory and turning it into a full-fledged city block with developed infrastructure worthy of being a neighbor of the Nevsky Prospect. People will live and work here; they will be able to do some shopping, go to a theater performance or an art exhibition.

“We developed several principles of renovating this complex, which guarantee the preservation of the historical heritage, at the same time creating a maximally comfortable and efficient infrastructure of a modern city block” – shares Nikita Yavein.

1. A pedestrian city

The historical network of driveways 4 to 8 meters wide is not fit for full-fledged city traffic. The optimum solution in this case would be to organize a totally pedestrian zone with a possibility of special vehicles driving in, should such need arise. The territory of “Apraksin Dvor” can in fact turn into one of the largest pedestrian zones of Saint Petersburg.

2. Developed underground space

The project continues and develops the basements of the existing buildings. The only underground floor serves for the loading of the shops and cafes, and provides a driving access to houses and shops that can only be accessed from underground, as well as to a limited-size parking garage for 441–757 parking places, depending on the adopted scenario and financial situation. In the special channels of the underground level, communications will be laid, which will facilitate their repair work.

3. An inhabited town

The upper levels of the shop buildings become residential ones, which makes it possible to get rid of the “endless marketplace” and looks more like a medieval guild town with the owners’ residences situated above their shops, which will be the perfect solution for the small business, for example, an antiques store, a doctor’s office or a legal firm. Currently, several developers and realtors already confirmed the popularity of such kind of real estate at the market of Saint Petersburg.

The architects tried to find a balance between the retail, public, and residential functions. It often happens that a popular cafe or club turns the life of the upper floor residents into a living hell. For this reason, the project provides for “quiet” streets – residential ones, with a minimum public function – and “loud” ones. The amount of residential premises, including apartment hotels, regular hotels and hostels is approximately equal the sum total of the public spaces: shops, cafes, offices, coworking spaces, services, sport clubs, museums, exhibition halls, and cultural centers.

4. Multifunctional

The tilt towards creative industries and travel service is not so much homage to fashion or hopping on the bandwagon but the result of the survey of the market situation: these directions were to help to achieve steady popularity of the residential and nob-residential spaces and buildings.

In addition, the architects though that it would be a waste not to take the advantage of the proximity of the Tovstonogov Bolshoi Drama Theater and the Vaganova Academy of Russian Ballet, allotting for the theater, musical, and art spaces a few buildings on the Fontanka side. This place will also host the experimental stage of the Tovstonogov Bolshoi Drama Theater, for which buildings 50 and 51 will be remodeled. In order to preserve the historical look of the buildings, the spectator hall will be placed in their reconstructed mutual yard. However, this experimental stage is the only example of the architects' “intrusion” into the historical city fabric.

5. Preservation

“We don’t tear anything down and we virtually don’t build anything new” – Nikita Yavein says. The cover of the sketch project bears the name of “restoration”. This term is, of course, applied to the historical buildings, and not to the later chaotic additions and other attributes of the "marketplace" period in “Aprashka”’s history. On the basis of the earlier conducted survey, the architects drew up a passport of condition and expected work on every (!) building, with a list of all the changes that took place in its appearance, and a detailed description of restoration work – this work includes, among other things, opening of the bricked-up window apertures, bricking up the “spontaneous” or “outlaw” windows and doors, and recreation of façade elements. The architects are also planning to recreate the обходных галерей on the second floor. Without this high degree of detailing and participation of the owners of buildings and premises, the project would have been doomed to follow into the footsteps of its predecessors

Tactics and Strategy

The architects got rid of illusions – for the single exception of their faith in a happy ending - and came up with a sustainable concept, implementable under virtually any conditions that can possibly come up in this country. First of all, the volumes of investment from the city budget are minimized. The city is expected to finance the construction of the underground part, and that, according to the most approximate estimates, is about 6-10 billion rubles. Given the conditions of the raging budget crisis, one can hardly count on blitz reconstruction a-la Moscow’s “My Street” program, and the concept provides for not just one but several scenarios: from minimum to maximum development of the underground space, in a comprehensive way or in several stages, defending on the resources of the management company.

Based on the negative experience of past attempts to attract a large investor, the architects started working with the owners of individual buildings or blocks, refraining from accumulating too much real property in one hands (more information on the owners of “Aprashka” is available here). It is obvious that for the owners the renovation is fraught with the necessity of some serious reorganization of their work and investments but at the same time a lot of them realize that the current state cannot last forever, while their active participation in the process puts them in a more advantageous position.

The concept provides for the “seizure”-type of renovation, which will consist in concluding contracts with each of the owners, for whom the company prepares an exhaustive pool of information necessary for devising a business plan, which will be instrumental for involving the owners in the renovation process. Currently, a few projects developed by “Studio 44” are getting all the mandatory approvals. A few more contracts are also on the way.

According to the estimates made by the authors of the concept, the step-by-step renovation of the entire complex will take up a few decades. However, for now, the architects find it important to get the process started. And there is no doubt that each new renovated building, each new fragment of the historical ensemble, will go a long way to attract new investors, which means that there is a fair chance of seeing one day the entire “Apraksin Dvor” come alive, and, who knows, maybe even renting a mansard for a week or so to immerse in the true Saint Petersburg atmosphere in the heart of this magnificent city.

05 June 2018

Written by:
Elena Petukhova
Translated by:
Anton Mizonov

Headlines now

in memoriam

In Memory of Valery Kanyashin

On Friday, February 27, architect Valery Kanyashin passed away – co-founder of Ostozhenka Architects and the author of many significant buildings in Moscow. We publish a text by Anatoly Belov in memory of Valery Kanyashin.

Report

Hypertext in Space

As part of the exhibition “What We Have We (Do Not) Keep”, Sergey Tchoban, the Museum of Architecture, and the CHART studio experiment with an eco-conscious approach to exhibition design, with thematic cross-references and even with publicistic reflections on the necessity of preserving modernism, the roots of contemporary architecture, and the birth of ideas. All of this makes the exhibition, with its light and transparent design, look quite innovative. The elements – both “material” and conceptual – are familiar, yet their combination is far from conventional.

Object

The Outline of “Foundation”

In their competition proposal for the Fili transport hub, the consortium led by Alexey Ilyin proposed an “inhabited arch” – a form that is simple yet complex. The architects emphasize that even at the competition stage, the project’s feasibility was fully calculated, taking into account the minimal nighttime closures of Bagration Avenue. How was this achieved? With what functions? Let us take a closer look. In our view, the building would have suited the heroes of Isaac Asimov’s Foundation novels perfectly.

Object

The Flying Horizontal

“A house in the spirit of Wright”, as architect Roman Leonidov describes it, pointing to his source of inspiration, was built on a challenging wedge-shaped site. To achieve a sense of intimacy and secure good views from the windows, the entire volume had to be shifted toward the far boundary, turning the house “back” to the neighboring mansions. The main façade demonstrates time-tested techniques often employed by the company: articulated horizontals, a weightless roofline, and a triad of materials – light plaster, dark slate, and warm wood.

Object

Needles of Horizon Contemplation

The “House of Horizons”, designed by Kleinewelt Architekten in Krylatskoye, is carefully thought out at the stereometric level – from the logic of how the volumes interlock (and, conversely, how gaps are articulated between them) to the triangular balconies that give the building its striking, slightly bristling silhouette.

News

The Red Thread

A linear park project prepared by Alexey Ilyin studio for the improvement of a riverbank in one of the residential districts seeks to reconnect people with nature. Two levels of the embankment invite visitors to contemplate the landscape while at the same time protecting the riverbank from excessive human impact. The “aerial street” links functional zones and the opposite banks, creating new points of attraction along the way: balconies, bridges, and even a “grotto”.

Object

Spindle and Thread

The concept of the Waver residential complex in Yekaterinburg draws inspiration from the past of the Parkovy district. In order to preserve the memory of the late-19th-century flax spinning mill once located here, the architectural company KPLN turns to the theme of textiles and weaving. The project’s main expressive device is a system of ribbons made of perforated weathering steel – a material that, in such volumes, has arguably not yet been used in Russian residential projects.

Object

Woven Into Sokolniki

Over the past few years, high-rise residential construction in former industrial zones has become the main theme of Moscow architecture. Towers are springing up here and there – but the question is what kind of towers they are. The residential complex CODE Sokolniki, designed by Ostozhenka Architects, is a project where every detail has been taken care of. The authors are attentive to the history of the site, the continuity of the urban fabric, the skyline, and visual corridors. They also proposed a motif with the lyrical name “scarf”. We take a closer look at the volumetric composition and the large-scale décor “woven”, in this case, out of terraces and balconies.

Interview

Stepan Liphart and Yuri Gerth: “Our Program Is Aesthetic”

The studio of Stepan Liphart, an architect known for his distinctive signature style and one-off projects, now has a partner. Yuri Khitrov, a specialist with a broad range of competencies, will take on the part of the work that distracts one from creativity but drives the business forward. One of the aims of this partnership is to improve the urban environment through dialogue with clients and officials. We spoke with both sides about their ambitions, the firm’s development strategy, shared values, and the need for pragmatism. And why the studio is called “Liphart & Gerth” only became clear at the very end of the interview.

Object

The Copper Mirror

The varied-toned sheen of “unsealed” copper, painterly streaks and fingerprints, exposed concrete, and the unusual proportions – when you study the ZILART Museum building by Sergei Tchoban and SPEECH architects, there is plenty to talk about. However, it seems to us that the most interesting thing is how the museum’s composition responds to the realities of the district itself. The residential district has been realized as an open-air exhibition of façade statements by contemporary architects – but without public access to the inner courtyards of the blocks. This building – that is, the museum – is exactly the opposite: on the outside, it is deliberately restrained, while inside it shines spectacularly, creating its own sunbeams in any weather.

View

“Strangers” in the City

We asked Alexander Skokan for a comment on the results of 2025 – and he sent us a whole article, moreover one devoted to the discussion we recently began on the “appropriateness of high-rises” – or, more broadly speaking, “contrasting insertions into the urban fabric”. The result is a text that is essentially a question: why here? Why like this?

Interview

Dmitry Ostroumov: “To use the language of alchemy, we are involved in the process of “transmutation...

What we ended up having was an extremely unusual conversation with Dmitry Ostroumov. Why? At the very least, because he is not just an architect specializing in the construction of Orthodox churches. And not just – which is an extreme rarity – a proponent of developing contemporary stylistics within this still highly conservative field. Dmitry Ostroumov is a Master of Theology. So in addition to the history and specifics of the company, we speak about the very concept of the temple, about canon and tradition, about the living and the eternal, and even about the Russian Logos.

Interview

MB-PROJECT: “Every new project is a challenge”

In this issue, we speak with Dmitry and Oleg Shurygin, founders of the company MV-PROJECT, which has extensive experience in designing theater and entertainment buildings as well as working with cultural heritage sites.

Object

A Glazed Figurine

In searching for an image for a residential building near the Novodevichy Convent, GAFA architects turned to their own perception of the place: it evoked associations with antiquity, plein-air painting, and vintage artifacts. The two towers will be entirely clad in volumetric glazed ceramic – at present, there are no other buildings like this in Russia. The complex will also stand out thanks to its metabolic bay-window cells, streamlined surfaces, a ceremonial “hotel-style” driveway, and a lobby overlooking a lush garden.

Report

A Knight’s Move via the Cour d’Honneur

Intercolumnium Architects presented to the City Planning Council a residential complex project that is set to replace the Aquatoria business center on Vyborgskaya Embankment. Experts praised the overall quality of the work, but expressed reservations about the three cour d’honneurs and suggested softening the contrast between the facades facing the embankment and the Kantemirovsky Bridge.

Object

A Small Country

Mezonproekt is developing a long-term master plan for the MEPhI campus in Obninsk. Over the next ten years, an enclave territory of about 100 hectares, located in a forest on the northern edge of the city, is set to transform into a modern center for the development of the nuclear energy sector. The plan envisions attracting international students and specialists, as well as comprehensive territorial development: both through the contemporary realization of “frozen” plans from the 1980s and through the introduction of new trends – public spaces, an aquapark, a food court, a school, and even a nuclear medicine center. Public and sports facilities are intended to be accessible to city residents as well, and the campus is to be physically and functionally connected to Obninsk.

Object

Pearl Divers

GAFA has designed an apartment complex for Derbent intended to switch people from a work mode to a resort mindset – and to give the surrounding area a much-needed jolt. The building offers two distinct faces: restrained and laconic on the city side, and a lushly ornate façade facing the sea. At the heart of the complex, a hidden pearl lies – an open-air pool with an arch, offering views of a starry sky, and providing direct access to the beach.

Object

A Satellite Island

The Genplan Institute of Moscow has prepared a master plan for the development of the Sarpinsky and Golodny island system, located within the administrative boundaries of Volgograd and considered among the largest river islands in Russia. By 2045, the plan envisions the implementation of 15 large-scale investment projects, including sports and educational clusters, a congress center with a “Volgonarium”, a film production cluster, and twenty-one theme parks. We explain which engineering, environmental, and transportation challenges must be addressed to turn this vision into reality. The master plan solutions have already been approved and incorporated into the city’s general development plan.

Object

The Amber Gate

The Amber City residential complex is one of the redevelopment projects in the former industrial area located beyond Moscow’s Third Ring Road near Begovaya metro station. Alexey Ilyin’s studio proposed an original master plan that transformed two clusters of towers into ceremonial propylaea, gave the complex a recognizable silhouette, and established visual connections with new high-rise developments on both right and left – thus integrating it into the scale of the growing metropolis. It is also marked by its own futuristic stylistic language, based on a reinterpreted streamline aesthetic.

Object

A Theater Triangle

The architectural company “Chetvertoe Izmerenie” (“Fourth Dimension”) has developed the design for a new stage of the Magnitogorsk Musical Theater, rethinking not only theater architecture but also the role of the theater in the contemporary city.

Interview

Aleksei Ilyin: “I approach every task with genuine interest”

Aleksei Ilyin has been working on major urban projects for more than 30 years. He has all the necessary skills for high-rise construction in Moscow – yet he believes it’s essential to maintain variety in the typologies and scales represented in his portfolio. He is passionate about drawing – but only from life, and also in the process of working on a project. We talk about the structure and optimal size of an office, about his past and current projects, large and small tasks, and about creative priorities.

Interview

Sergey Tchoban: “My ideal model for shaping a museum space is the Uffizi Gallery. In the...

Yesterday, the ZILART Museum opened on the ZILART grounds with three exhibitions curated by well-known curators. We speak with Sergey Tchoban about the concept and its realization.

Object

A Golden Sunbeam

A compact brick-and-metal building in the growing Shukhov Park in Vyksa seems to absorb sunlight, transform it into yellow accents inside, and in the evening “give it back” as a warm golden glow streaming from its windows. It is, frankly, a very attractive building: both material and lightweight at the same time, with lightness inside and materiality outside. Its form is shaped by function – laconic, yet far from simple. Let’s take a closer look.

Architecton Awards

In 2025, the jury of the Architecton festival reviewed the finalist projects through live, open presentations held right in the exhibition hall – a rather engaging performance, and something rarely seen among Russian awards. It would be great if “Zodchestvo” adopted this format. Below, we present all the winning projects, including four special nominations.

send.project

Garden of Knowledge

UNK architects and UNK design created the interiors of the Letovo Junior campus, working together with NF Studio, which was responsible for developing the educational technology that takes into account the needs and perception of younger and middle school children.

The Silver Skates

The STONE Kaluzhskaya office quarter is accompanied by two residential towers, making the complex – for it is indeed a single ensemble – well balanced in functional terms. The architects at Kleinewelt gave the residential buildings a silvery finish to match the office blocks. How they are similar, how they differ, and what “Silver Skates” has to do with it – we explore in this article.

Overview

On the Dynastic Trail

The houses and townhouses of the “Tsarskaya Tropа” (“Czar’s Trail”) complex are being built in the village of Gaspra in Crimea – to the west and east of the palaces of the former grand-ducal residence “Ai-Todor”. One of the main challenges for the architects at KPLN, who developed the project, was to respond appropriately to this significant neighboring heritage. How this influenced the massing, the façades, and the way the authors work with the terrain is explored in our article.

Object

A New Path

The main feature of the Yar Park project, designed by Sergey Skuratov for Kazan, is that it is organized along the “spine” of a multifunctional mall with an impressive multi-height atrium space in its middle. The entire site, both on the city side and the Kazanka River embankment, is open to the public. The complex is intended not to become “yet another fenced enclave” but, as urban planners say, a “polycenter” – a new point of attraction for the whole of Kazan, especially its northern part, made up of residential districts that until now have lacked such a vibrant public space. It represents a new urban planning approach to a high-density mixed-use development situated in the city center – in a sense, an “anti-quarter”. Even Moscow, one might say, doesn’t yet have anything quite like it. Well, lucky Kazan!

Object

Beneath the Azure Sky

A depository designed by Studio 44 will soon be built in Kenozersky National Park to preserve and display the so-called “heavens” – ceiling structures characteristic of wooden churches in the Russian North, painted with biblical scenes. For each of these “heavens”, the architects created a volume corresponding in scale and dimensions to the original church interior. The result is a honeycomb-like composition, with modules derived directly from the historic monuments themselves, allowing visitors to view the icons from the historically accurate angle – from below, looking upward. How exactly this works is the subject of our story.

Object

The Power of Lines

The building at the very beginning of New Arbat is the result of long deliberations over how to replace the former House of Communication. Contemporary, dynamic, and even somewhat zoomorphic in character, it is structured around a large diagonal grid. The building has become a striking accent both in the perspective of the former Kalinin Avenue and in the panorama of Arbat Square. Yet, unfortunately, the original concept was not fully realized. In 2020, the Moscow ArchCouncil approved a design featuring an exoskeleton – an external load-bearing structure, which eventually turned into a purely decorative element. Still, the power of the supergraphic “holds” the building, giving it the qualities of a new urban landmark with iconic potential. How this concept took shape, what unexpected associations might underlie the grid’s form, and why the exoskeleton was never built – all this is explored in our article.

​The Story of Apraksin Dvor

The Story of Apraksin Dvor