По-русски

​The Vladimir Gate

The Golden Gate business center became a noticeable complement to the district of Rogozhskaya Zastava – the architects creatively revised the increase in the construction scale of this area. The mind-blowing cantilevered overpass situated at the level of the twenty-second floor is arguably the first experiment of such kind in Moscow.

22 January 2018
Object
mainImg
Architect:
Pavel Andreev
Firm:
Paul Andreev
Object:
Mixed-use complex. Moscow, Central Administrative District, Entuziastov highway, vladenie 2-4
Russia, Moscow, Entuziastov highway, vladenie 2-4

Project Team:
Andreev P.U. – the corporate authors’ leader
Rimashevskaja I.I. – chief project engineer
Rjazanov L.V., Pavlova E.V., Mohammad I.A.

11.2004 — 12.2006 / 2007 — 2014

The project of the business center at the Ploshchad Ilicha Square was already covered by us in 2007. It was completed in 2014, and for several years already it has been serving as the landmark of this square, clearly visible from a distance: from the point on the Garden Ring before the Yauza Bridge, from the crossing of the Entuziastov Highway and the Third Transport Ring, from the bridge of the Kurskaya Railroad, from the Sergeya Radonezhskogo Street, and in the historical perspective of the Shkolnaya Street.

Generally speaking, the architects have definitely been able to implement the main themes of the project – so indivisible was the concept of the open city gate executed in the form of a pivotal connection between two different but equally sized slabs, standing at an angle to each other, with an overpass connecting them at the top.

“The Vladimir road used to lie where now the Shkolnaya Street is; this is its historic route. Here, on this square, it crossed with the Kamer-Kollezhsky Val – Pavel Andreev shares – There are no “vals” (which translates as “ramparts”) any longer, memories of them only remaining in the names of the local streets, and there is no “zastava” (which literally translates as “city gate”) – there is only a square that bears that name. This is why we allowed ourselves to call our project “Vladimirskie Vorota” (“Vladimir Gate”), and treat this building, well, not in the most literal sense, rather conditionally, but still as a gate, a part of the city border. Then the owners renamed it to become “Golden Gate” by analogy with the “Golden Gate”, which stands for the Kremlin in the city of Vladimir – a posh commercial spin, really.

As for our idea, however, it was more of a town-planning character: what we wanted to do was to give back to this place its historical symbol, reviving it on a modern scale”.

"Golden Gate" multifunctional complex © Pavel Andreev. Photograph © Julia Tarabarina, Archi.ru
"Golden Gate" multifunctional complex © Pavel Andreev. Photograph © Julia Tarabarina, Archi.ru


"Golden Gate" multifunctional complex © Pavel Andreev. Photograph © Julia Tarabarina, Archi.ru


"Golden Gate" multifunctional complex © Pavel Andreev. Photograph © Julia Tarabarina, Archi.ru


"Golden Gate" multifunctional complex © Pavel Andreev. Photograph © Julia Tarabarina, Archi.ru


The gate that opens up the road which leads to the city of Vladimir is, of course, a general image that was borrowed not so much from the historical reality as from the town-planning situation. In fact, the Rogozhskaya Zastava was vastly different: built in the late XVIII century, it consisted of two low-rise corps de gardes or “guardhouses” with arched galleries and obelisks – the inevitable parts of the city boundaries built in the times of Catherine the Great.

zooming
Rogozhskie Vorota. Fragment of the "Nouveau plan de Moscou illustre" ("New Illustrated Plan of Moscow") published by Daziaro, M, 1852 / retromap.ru


zooming
Rogozhskaya Zastava, XIX century. tinlib.ru


The Zastava consisted in fact if two squares: what is now known as Shkolnaya Ulitsa would lead, back in those days, to the still older Sennaya Ulitsa, which actually was “strung” on the old Vladimir Square, while the neighboring Rogozhskaya Zastava Square was comparatively new. Today, both squares merged into one and then disappeared, swallowed by the road junction overlooking the railroad bridge and surrounded from one side by old-Moscow two-story houses, and from the other side – by prefabricated 12-story houses built back in the 1980’s, the latest reiteration of the great construction boom of the early heroic years; although standard, these houses stand along the “red” construction line, and they surprisingly have porches in front of them, which are obviously meant to pay homage to other buildings of this area and decrease the perception scale of these 12-story things.

In a word, this place is highly contrastive; several epochs and town-planning trends come together here.

The business center designed by Pavel Andreev made the most out of this contrast. Two towers: one 26 stories high with a half-story of technical rooms, coated with light-pale ceramic granite, is subjugated to the strict pattern of moderately vertical windows and is stretched along the Entuziastov Highway, thus belonging to the road leading out of town. The pattern of the windows and the color of the façade echo the neighboring Stalin house, which is #2 on the Rogozhsky Val – although the tower is three and a half times as tall, it still continues the line of the street by picking up the rhythm but making it clearer and denser. This is particularly visible from the beginning of the Shkolnaya Ulitsa.

"Golden Gate" multifunctional complex © Pavel Andreev. Photograph © Julia Tarabarina, Archi.ru


The second tower has 24 stories in it; all of its façades are covered in blacked out glass of different shades and transparency: this technique was earlier used by “Ostozhenka” in designing the “Panorama” residential project. However, great as it is, this technique, helps to turn the tower into a solid slab of dark glass: it grows up from the bottom floor without so much as a hint at a basement: here you’ve got the pavement stones, and there is glass staring you right in the face. The idea consisted in masking all the intermediate floors by making the second tower look like a completely single whole to the point of being slightly unreal and ostentatiously modern – and this attempt was a success.

Although it was originally planned that the glass tower was to be darker, and although it was planned that it would be a hotel, now both of the volumes are occupied by the offices of the business center. One must admit that the original idea was slightly more on the rugged side, yet it looked more detailed because of the hi-tech antennas near the south façade. Now, however, it is a solid prism that looks like it was chiseled from some dark-water iceberg.Of course, if one really feels like counting the floors, he can do it but he will have to look really hard: the volume is really solid, and at the same time colorful; besides, it quickly reacts to changes in the ambient light, constantly shifting its shades, which looks particularly great at sunset because its main façade is the west one.

"Golden Gate" multifunctional complex © Pavel Andreev. Photograph © Julia Tarabarina, Archi.ru


"Golden Gate" multifunctional complex © Pavel Andreev. Photograph © Julia Tarabarina, Archi.ru


The glass tower is stretched along the Rogozhsky Val Street, and it follows its curve; what it ends up being is some sort of a reshuffle – the volume with windows, designed in a more traditional way, “spills over the town”, while the more modern one marks the city’s historical boundary. The gate turned out to be quite convincing, the only difference being that it stands on one side of the highway and, come right down to it, looks more like one open wing of the gate. But it is even more interesting that way.

The most striking architectural gesture is the cantilevered overpass whose glass volume barges into the neighboring tower at the height of the 22-24th floors; it is even mentioned at the business center’s website, which is a relatively rare thing by Moscow standards. Looking from the inside of the overpass, one will be able to see the zigzag of the truss added in order to strengthen the structure: initially it was not planned to be there, and the “camouflage” pattern of the glass façade is partially explained by the desire to hide the silhouette of the truss.

"Golden Gate" multifunctional complex © Pavel Andreev. Photograph © Julia Tarabarina, Archi.ru


"Golden Gate" multifunctional complex © Pavel Andreev. Photograph © Julia Tarabarina, Archi.ru


"Golden Gate" multifunctional complex © Pavel Andreev. Photograph © Julia Tarabarina, Archi.ru


The crossing of the elements accentuates the turning angle and draws one’s attention to the large form helping the building to fit in with the scale of the new city: yes, this is a borderline place but the city keeps growing – soon, slightly to the east, the buildings of the “Symbol” housing project will be completed in the stead of the former “Serp i Molot” plant, and then the overall height of the area (which now looks pretty diverse) will surely increase.

Meanwhile, the business center “picks up” this very theme of “height diversity” of this area, adding two towers, so effectively linked with each other by volumes of smaller scale – a five and a four-story one. The former continues the light tower standing along the Entuziastov Highway, the arch of the latter joins the glass high-rise from the side of the Mezhdunarodnaya Street; it hosts the 2-star hostel Netizen that is a hit with its numerous guests. Both wings do not imitate the historical construction and do not try to either present a semblance of “Dutch houses” or even imitate the style of the Shkolnaya Street. Technically, their façades are designed just about in the same way as the first tower – from ceramic granite. Looking at them, one can even feel an element of deconstruction: there is a large see-through grille towering above each of the buildings, as if the top floor was dismantled but its framework was left to stay there.

"Golden Gate" multifunctional complex © Pavel Andreev. Photograph © Julia Tarabarina, Archi.ru


"Golden Gate" multifunctional complex © Pavel Andreev. Photograph © Julia Tarabarina, Archi.ru


"Golden Gate" multifunctional complex © Pavel Andreev. Photograph © Julia Tarabarina, Archi.ru


"Golden Gate" multifunctional complex © Pavel Andreev. Photograph © Julia Tarabarina, Archi.ru


"Golden Gate" multifunctional complex © Pavel Andreev. Photograph © Julia Tarabarina, Archi.ru


The volumes veer off eastward like a pair of scissors, forming a small trapeze-shaped yard, rather empty but still open to the general public; one can traverse it, first passing beneath the minor link in front of the hotel, and then marveling at the high overpass between the towers.

"Golden Gate" multifunctional complex © Pavel Andreev. Photograph © Julia Tarabarina, Archi.ru


And, while the minor volume, which stands next to the highway, does not mimic the neighboring buildings but, rather, forms five-story construction front side, the hotel, which stands on the Mezhdunarodnaya Street, continues the lineup of the neighboring buildings – rather curious-looking silicate brick five-stories with a square plan and a double-pitch roof, unusual for Moscow (MG-2 series, mid-1950’s). The Mezhdunarodnaya Street remained low-rise and cozy; it even looks as if it was “hidden” behind the shield of the glass tower. Thus, the business center, which definitely belongs with the future in many ways, grows from the past, belonging at the same time with its surroundings, trying to tie in the former and the latter. In this sense, it is the inheritor of the idea that once gave birth to the panel houses which stand along the Sergeya Radonezhskogo Street, an attempt to tie in two different scales and completely different times, show respect to different types of construction and make them “make peace” with each other.

"Golden Gate" multifunctional complex © Pavel Andreev. Photograph © Julia Tarabarina, Archi.ru


Walking around the complex is a rather pleasant thing to do, although there isn’t any “green” landscaping around it, just paving stones. But the abundance of cafes and other businesses that populated the bottom floors is doing its job turning the small square behind and in front of the towers into a cozy little place. The impressions are strengthened by round metallic supports placed within the contour of the glass façade – the “casing” of the tower in front of the main entrance – as if the shell of the 26-story building suddenly lifted itself up in the air giving the visitors an opportunity to come inside.

"Golden Gate" multifunctional complex © Pavel Andreev. Photograph © Julia Tarabarina, Archi.ru


"Golden Gate" multifunctional complex © Pavel Andreev. Photograph © Julia Tarabarina, Archi.ru


"Golden Gate" multifunctional complex © Pavel Andreev. Photograph © Julia Tarabarina, Archi.ru


"Golden Gate" multifunctional complex © Pavel Andreev. Photograph © Julia Tarabarina, Archi.ru


As for the underground structure of this complex, it is rather sophisticated. Both towers rest on the lobbies of the “Rimskaya” metro station; it neighbors on the complex’s parking lot (it must be said that because of the communication difficulties the parking lot was made partially overland). In addition, Pavel Andreev, the architect who likes his projects to unobtrusively fit in with the city not only in terms of their plastique and theme but also from the technical standpoint, insisted that the engineering lines of the complex be routed to an underground collector, which could be later extended by connecting the neighboring buildings to it. Alas, the initiative did not get much support: in particular, “Symbol” opted out of getting connected to this collector, and the system remained on paper. Which, incidentally, does not by any means devalue the architects’ attempt “to do the right thing” that they tried to make in the “Golden Gate” project: possibly, those who will come after them will use this resource one day.


Architect:
Pavel Andreev
Firm:
Paul Andreev
Object:
Mixed-use complex. Moscow, Central Administrative District, Entuziastov highway, vladenie 2-4
Russia, Moscow, Entuziastov highway, vladenie 2-4

Project Team:
Andreev P.U. – the corporate authors’ leader
Rimashevskaja I.I. – chief project engineer
Rjazanov L.V., Pavlova E.V., Mohammad I.A.

11.2004 — 12.2006 / 2007 — 2014

22 January 2018

Headlines now
Living in the Architecture of One’s Own Making
Do architects design houses for themselves? You bet! In this article, we are examining a new book by TATLIN publishing house. This book – unprecedented for Russia – features 52 private homes designed and built by contemporary architects for themselves. It includes houses that are famous, even iconic, as well as lesser-known ones; large and small, stylish and eccentric. To some extent, the book reflects the history of Russian architecture over the past 30 years.
A City Block Isoline
Another competition project for a residential complex on the banks of the Volga in Nizhny Novgorod has been prepared by Studio 44. A team of architects led by Ivan Kozhin concluded that using a regular block layout in such a location would be inappropriate and developed a “custom design” approach: a chain of parceled multi-section buildings stretching along the entire embankment. Let’s explore the features and advantages of this unconventional method.
Competition: The Price of Creativity?
Any day now, we’re expecting the results of a competition held by the “Samolet” development group for a plot in Kommunarka. In the meantime, we share the impressions of Editor-in-Chief Julia Tarabarina, who managed to conduct a public talk. Though technically focused on the interaction between developers and architects, the public talk turned into a discussion about the pros and cons of architectural competitions.
Terraced Design
The “River Park” residential complex has confidently and securely shaped the Nagatinsky Backwater shoreline. Featuring a public embankment, elevated courtyards connected by pedestrian bridges, and brick façades, the development invites exploration of its nuanced response to the surrounding context, as well as hints of the architects’ megalithic design thinking.
A Kremlin’s Core and Meteorite Fragments
We continue our coverage of the competition projects for the residential district that the development company GloraX plans to build along the embankment of the Rowing Channel in Nizhny Novgorod. ASADOV Architects approached the concept through a deep dive into local identity, using storytelling to pinpoint a central idea for the design: the master plan and composition are imagined as if a meteorite had struck a “proto-Kremlin”. Sounds weird? Find more details below!
The Volga Regatta
GloraX plans to develop a residential complex spanning 14 hectares along the Volga River in Nizhny Novgorod. The winning design in a closed-door competition, created by GORA Architects, features housing typologies ranging from townhouses to terraced high-rise slabs, a balance of functions, diverse ways of engaging with the water, and even a dedicated island (no less!) for the city residents.
A New Track
We took a thorough look at D_Station, a railcar repair depot dating back to 1906, recently reconstructed while preserving its century-old industrial structure, upon the project by Sergey Trukhanov and T+T Architects. Though work on the interiors – set to house restaurants and public spaces – is still underway, the building’s exterior already offers plenty to see. Visitors can explore the blend of old and new brickwork, appreciate the architect’s unique interpretation of ruin aesthetics, and enjoy the newly built pedestrian route that connects the Citydel Business Center’s arches to Kazakova Street.
Four Different Surveys
The “Explore the City” competition, organized this year by the Genplan Institute of Moscow, stands out as a pretty unconventional one for the architectural field but aligns perfectly well with the character of urban planning work. The winning project analyzed contemporary residential complexes, combining urban planning insights with a realtor’s perspective to propose a hybrid approach. Other entries explored public centers, motivations for car ownership, and housing vacancy rates. A fifth participant withdrew. Here’s a closer look at the four completed works.
Scheduled Evolution
ASADOV Architects unveiled the EvyCenter pavilion, a microcultural hub for fostering personal growth, organizing workshops, and doing gymnastics. Additionally, this pavilion serves as a prototype for a scalable country house, drawing inspiration from the “Loskutok” project, and constructed from CLT panels in a factory. This marks the beginning of a developer project initiated by the architectural firm (sic!), which is seeking partners to expand both small Evy settlements and even larger Evy cities, which are, according to Andrey Asadov, aimed at fostering the “evolutionary” development of the people who will inhabit them.
The Golden Crown
The concept for a dental clinic in Yekaterinburg, developed by CNTR Studio, revolves around the idea of a “mouth full of gold”: pristine white porcelain stoneware walls are complemented by matte brass details. To avoid an overly literal interpretation, the architects focused on the building’s proportions, skillfully navigating between sunlight requirements and fire safety regulations.
Flexibility and Integration
Not long ago, we covered the project for the fourth phase of the ÁLIA residential complex, designed by APEX. Now, we’ve been shown different fence concepts they developed to enclose the complex’s private courtyards, incorporating a variety of public functions. We believe that the sheer fact that the complex’s architects were involved in such a detail as fencing speaks volumes.
A Step Forward
The HIDE residential complex represents a major milestone for ADM architects and their leaders Andrey Romanov and Ekaterina Kuznetsova in their quest for a fresh high-rise aesthetic – one that is flexible and layered, capable of bringing vibrancy to mass and silhouette while shaping form. Over recent years, this approach has become ADM’s “signature style”, with the golden HIDE tower playing a pivotal role in its evolution. Here, we delve into the project’s story, explore the details of the complex’s design, and uncover its core essence.
Gold in the Sands
A new office for a transcontinental company specializing in resource extraction and processing has opened in Dubai. Designed by T+T Architects, masters of creating spaces that are contemporary, diverse, flexible, and original, this project exemplifies their expertise. On the executive floor, a massive brass-clad partition dominates, while layered textures of compressed earth create a contextually resonant backdrop.
Layers and Levels of Flight
This project goes way back – Reserve Union won this architectural competition at the end of 2011, and the building was completed in 2018, so it’s practically “archival”. However, despite being relatively unknown, the building can hardly be considered “dated” and remains a prime example of architectural expression, particularly in the headquarters genre. And it’s especially fitting for an aviation company office. In some ways, it resembles the Aeroflot headquarters at Sheremetyevo but with its own unique identity, following the signature style of Vladimir Plotkin. In this article, we take an in-depth look at the United Aircraft Corporation (UAC) headquarters in the Moscow agglomeration town of Zhukovsky, supplemented by recent photographs from Alexey Naroditsky – a shoot that became only recently possible due to the fact that improvements were finally made in the surrounding area.
Light and Shadow
In this article, we delve into the architectural design of the “Chaika” house by DNK ag architects, which was recently completed in 2023 as part of the collection of signature designs at ZILArt. As is well-known, all the buildings in this complex follow a design code, yet each one is distinct. This particular building stands out not only for its whiteness and minimalism but also for the refined use of a limited number of techniques that, together, create what can confidently be called synergy.
Casus Novae
A master plan was developed for a large residential area with a name of “DNS City”, but now that its implementation began, the plan has been arbitrarily reformatted and replaced with something that, while similar on the surface, is actually quite different. This is not the first time such a thing happens, but it’s always frustrating. With permission from the author, we are sharing Maria Elkina’s post.
Treasure Hunting
The GAFA bureau, in collaboration with Tegola and Arkhitail, organized an expedition to the island of Kilpola in Karelia as part of Moskomarkhitektura’s “Open City” festival. There, amidst moss and rocks, the students sought answers to questions like: what is the sacred, where does it dwell, and what sustains it? Assisting the participants in this quest were landscape engineer Evgeny Levin, artist Nicholas Roerich, a moose, and the lack of cellular connection. Here’s how the story unfolded.
Depths of the Earth, Streams of Water
In the Malaya Okhta district, the Akzent building, designed by Stepan Liphart, was constructed. It follows a classic tripartite structure, yet it’s what you might call “hand-drawn”: each façade is unique in its form and details, some of which aren’t immediately noticeable. In this article, we explore the context and, together with the architect, delve into how the form was developed.
Fir Tree Dynamics
The “Airports of Region” holding is planning to build an airport in Karachay-Cherkessia, aiming to make the Arkhyz and Dombay resorts more accessible to travelers. The project that won in an invitation-only competition, submitted by Sergey Nikeshkin’s KPLN, blends natural imagery inspired by the shape of a conifer seed, open-air waiting spaces, majestic large trees, and a green roof elevated on needle-like columns. The result is both nature-inspired and WOW.
​A Brick Shell
In the process of designing a clubhouse situated among pine trees in a prestigious suburban area near Moscow, the architectural firm “A.Len” did the façade design part. The combination of different types of brick and masonry correlates with the volumetric and plastique solutions, further enhanced by the inclusion of wood-painted fragments and metal “glazing”.
Word Forms
ATRIUM architects love ambitious challenges, and for the firm’s thirtieth anniversary, they boldly play a game of words with an exhibition that dives deep into a self-created vocabulary. They immerse their projects – especially art installations – into this glossary, as if plunging into a current of their own. You feel as if you’re flowing through the veins of pure art, immersed in a universe of vertical cities, educational spaces – of which the architects are true masters – and the cultural codes of various locations. But what truly captivates is the bold statement that Vera Butko and Anton Nadtochy make, both through their work and this exhibition: architecture, above all, is art – the art of working with form and space.
Flexibility and Acuteness of Modernity
Luxurious, fluid, large “kokoshniks” and spiral barrel columns, as if made from colorful chewing gum: there seem to be no other mansion like this in Moscow, designed in the “Neo-Russian-Modern” style. And the “Teremok” on Malaya Kaluzhskaya, previously somewhat obscure, has “come alive with new colors” and gained visibility after its restoration for the office of the “architectural ecosystem” as the architects love to call themselves. It’s evident that Julius Borisov and the architects at UNK put their hearts into finding this new office and bringing it up to date. Let’s delve into the paradoxes of this mansion’s history and its plasticity. Spoiler: two versions of modernity meet here, both balancing on the razor’s edge of “what’s current”.
Yuri Vissarionov: “A modular house does not belong to the land”
It belongs to space, or to the air... It turns out that 3D printing is more effective when combined with a modular approach: the house is built in a workshop and then adapted to the site, including on uneven terrain. Yuri Vissarionov shares his latest experience in designing tourist complexes, both in central Russia and in the south. These include houseboats, homes printed from lightweight concrete using a 3D printer, and, of course, frame houses.
​Moscow’s First
“The quality of education largely depends on the quality of the educational environment”. This principle of the last decade has been realized by Sergey Skuratov in the project for the First Moscow Gymnasium on Rostovskaya Embankment in the Khamovniki district. The building seamlessly integrates into the complex urban landscape, responding both to the pedestrian flow of the city and the quiet alleyways. It skillfully takes advantage of the height differences and aligns with modern trends in educational space design. Let’s take a closer look.
Looking at the Water
The site of Villa Sonata stretches from the road to the water’s edge, offering its own shoreline, pier, and a picturesque river panorama. To reveal these sweeping views, Roman Leonidov “cut” the façade diagonally parallel to the river, thus getting two main axes for the house and, consequently, “two heads”. The internal core – two double-height spaces, a living room and a conservatory, with a “bridge” above them – makes the house both “transparent” and filled with light.
The White Wing
Well, it’s not exactly white. It’s more of a beige, white-stone structure that plays with the color of limestone – smoother surfaces are lighter, while rougher ones are darker. This wing unites various elements: it absorbs and interprets the surrounding themes. It responds to everything, yet maintains a cohesive expression – a challenging task! – while also incorporating recognizable features of its own, such as the dynamic cuts at the bottom, top, and middle.
Urban Dunes
The XSA Ramps team designed and built a three-part sports hub for a park in Rostov-on-Don, welcoming people of all ages and fitness levels. The skate plaza, pump track, and playground are all meticulously crafted with details that attract a diverse range of visitors. The technical execution of the shapes and slopes transforms this space into a kind of sculptural composition.
Proportional Growth
The project for the fourth phase of the ÁLIA residential area has been announced. The buildings are situated on an elongated plot – almost a “ray” that shoots out from the center of the area towards the river. Their layout reflects both a response to Moscow’s architectural preferences over the past 15 years, shifting “from blocks to towers”, and an interpretation of the neighboring business park designed by SOM. Additionally, the best apartments here are not located at the very top but closer to the middle, forming a glowing “waistline”.
The “Staircase” Building
In designing the “Details” residential complex in New Moscow, Rais Baishev spiced up the now-popular Moscow theme of a “courtyard” building with an idea drawn from the surrealist drawings by Maurits Escher. He envisioned the stepped silhouettes and descending slopes as a metaphysical mega-staircase, creating a key void within the courtyard that gave the project an internal “spine”. This concept is felt both in the building’s silhouette and on its façades.
Projection of the Quarter
No one doubted that the building that Vladimir Plotkin designed as part of the “Garden Quarters” would be the most modernist of all. And it turned out just that way: while adhering to the common design code, the building successfully combines brick and white stone, rhythmically responding to the neighboring building designed by Ostozhenka, yet tactfully and persistently making a few statements of its own. This includes the projection of the ideal urban development composition “14–9–6”, which can be found right next door, mathematical calculations, including those for various types of terraces (and perhaps the only reminder of the Soviet past of the Kauchuk rubber factory!), and the white “cross-stitch” pattern of the façade grid.