По-русски

Arma: Improvement

What has been improved in the “Arma” site and around it – and how.

08 April 2016
Object
mainImg

Over the last five years, the very concept of “site improvement” has already become hoary, and has convinced everyone of its importance. The notion of commercial value of architecture has finally grown outside from within: from the beautiful interior of the 90s, through the beautiful façade of the 2000s – up to the understanding of the value of a conveniently equipped urban space. In this case, there are two projects: the architects of Sergey Kiselev & Partners designed the site improvement of the former factory in 2012, implemented it in 2014-2015, and worked on the adjacent the Nijniy Susalny lane in 2015, having the whole work finished by the City Day in September. Two projects – one goal: to bring the space of the former factory and its surrounding area to shape. So, it all calls for having a look at the whole improvement of “Arma”.

It has at least two special features. First, the means are rather economical and minimalistic, with no claim either to modernistic luxury of materials, or to Biedermeier with curving backs of the benches – that we so much enjoy on Moscow boulevards. Perhaps, it is due to the creativity of the block – so its residents would treat any frills ironically by definition; but it cannot be ruled out that it were the beliefs of the chief architect of both improvement projects – Alexey Medvedev – a confirmed minimalist, but the improvement turned out to be in a severe “factory-like” style. And quite right: some trinkets would look quite out of place next to a brick tube growing out of the ground, or a gas valve, growing out of the wall. The place itself dictates the approach. At the same time, compared to the neighboring art-blocks of Vinzavod (Rus. “winery”) and Artplay, whose improvement is hardly noticeable – if in fact present, the effort invested here is much more significant.

Arma: pedestrian boulevard between units 3 and 4 © Sergey Kiselev and Partners. Photo © Julia Tarabarina, 2016
Arma: site improvement. Bird's height view. Visualization, 2012 © Sergey Kiselev and Partners.


Arma: site improvement. © Sergey Kiselev and Partners. Photograph © Julia Tarabarina


Elements of site improvement concentrate towards the center and rarely at the periphery, searching the territory for a coziness of the pedestrian “nucleus” and leaving the outer contours to vehicles. The main hero here is a pedestrian boulevard between the 3d and 4th buildings with the mentioned tube and valve. The architects used corten steel here – a brutal material, but not at all cheap, just from the artistic kind. It coats the flower-beds lifted up to a knee-level and framing the wooden benches. On the other side, is a line of street-lights made in tubes of milk glass, setting the same, not very high man-oriented scale. This is a boulevard for sitting around and chatting, to stop for a while and catch breath.  

Arma: site improvement. © Sergey Kiselev and Partners. Photograph © Julia Tarabarina


Arma: site improvement. © Sergey Kiselev and Partners. Photograph © Julia Tarabarina


Arma: site improvement. © Sergey Kiselev and Partners. Photograph © Julia Tarabarina
      

The second boulevard coincides with the main axis and is on the contrary very mobile. It is longitudinally divided between the cars coming from the Nijniy Susalny lane through Check-point No.1 and pedestrians. The dividing line is formed by a line of lights – good modern street-lamps, lighting both sides. The pedestrian part, following the change of height (which exceeds 2 meters on “Arma” territory), is also divided in two: the higher and lower ones. The first adjoins the motor-car area, and leads inside and even straight through. The second one lies about 1,5 meters lower – we go down the steps to get here, and from this point, we can arrive in buildings 4-5: here the traffic slows down, and the mini-boulevard becomes a mini-square.    

Arma: site improvement. © Sergey Kiselev and Partners. Photograph © Julia Tarabarina


Arma: site improvement. © Sergey Kiselev and Partners. Photograph © Julia Tarabarina
  

The two boulevards are the axle of this space and its inner life, but they also have some branches: after completion of all works, the park with the Great Patriotic War monument between buildings 3 and 1 will be evidently stretched into a pedestrian and automobile side street; the area between gas-holders and building 5 has been already turned into a park with round lawns, where the Moscow girls arrange photo-sets.    

Arma: site improvement. © Sergey Kiselev and Partners. Photograph © Julia Tarabarina


Arma: site improvement. © Sergey Kiselev and Partners. Photograph © Julia Tarabarina


Arma: site improvement. © Sergey Kiselev and Partners. Photograph © Julia Tarabarina


Arma: site improvement. © Sergey Kiselev and Partners. Photograph © Julia Tarabarina


Arma: pedestrian zone improvement. © Sergey Kiselev and Partners. Photograph © Julia Tarabarina


Another peculiar feature is the openness of the territory, at which every industrial zone reconstruction in Moscow is rhetorically aimed, but ultimately closes in anyway – fully or emotionally – and places such check-points, where one would hardly try to enter for no good reason. Here, it is a bit different: people enter through freely and stay inside rather leisurely. The authors managed to create an inner-city district. It can be clearly felt that this territory has been added to the city and has the potential of further development. Certainly, providing four exits also matters greatly for the effect of openness: two from Nijniy Susalny lane, one from Mruzovskiy and the fourth entrance point – for the ones who are aware – from a nameless lane at the northeast corner.      

Nijniy Susalny lane, formerly overloaded with height discontinuity and snack stands, has been cleared, improved and presented to the city. All the height differences have been considered and used to create a “stepping” space with natural lawns and wide flights of steps – it has become much easier to breathe in here, the “gorge” feeling has been replaced with the delight from unpredictable Moscow relief: partly bluff, partly flat. 

Arma: pedestrian zone improvement. © Sergey Kiselev and Partners. Photograph © Julia Tarabarina


Arma: the main entrance. Version 1. Visualization, 2015 © Sergey Kiselev and Partners



 

where:Russia, Moscow
date2012 — 2013 / 2013 — 2015
function:Masterplanning / Landscaping
studio:
Sergey Kisselev & Partners
http://www.sk-p.ru/
architect:Alexey MedvedevVladimir Labutin
  • zooming
    1 / 7
  • zooming
    2 / 7
  • zooming
    3 / 7
  • zooming
    4 / 7
  • zooming
    5 / 7
  • zooming
    6 / 7
    Arma: site improvement. © Sergey Kiselev and Partners. Photograph © Julia Tarabarina
  • zooming
    7 / 7

where:Russia, Moscow
date2012 — 2014 / 2014 — 2015
function:Masterplanning / Landscaping
studio:
Sergey Kisselev & Partners
http://www.sk-p.ru/
architect:Alexey Medvedev
  • zooming
    1 / 7
    Arma: pedestrian zone improvement. © Sergey Kiselev and Partners. Photograph © Julia Tarabarina
  • zooming
    2 / 7
  • zooming
    3 / 7
  • zooming
    4 / 7
    Arma: pedestrian zone improvement. © Sergey Kiselev and Partners. Photograph © Julia Tarabarina
  • zooming
    5 / 7
  • zooming
    6 / 7
  • zooming
    7 / 7


08 April 2016

Headlines now
Magnetic Forces
“Krylatskaya 33” is the first large-scale residential complex to appear amidst the 1980s “micro-districts” that harmoniously coexist with the forests, the river, the slopes, and the sports infrastructure. Despite its imposing scale, the architects of Ostozhenka managed to turn the complex into something that can be best described as a “graceful dominant”. First, they designed the complex with consideration for the style and height of the surrounding micro-districts. Second, by introducing a pause in its tallest section, they created compositional tension – right along the urban planning axis of the area.
Grigory Revzin: “It Was a Bold Statement Made on the Sly. Something Won”
In this article, we discuss the debates surrounding the circus competition and the demolition of the CMEA building with the most renowned architectural critic of our time. A paradox emerges in the process: while nostalgia for the Brezhnev era seems to be in vogue in Russia, a landmark building – the “axis” of the Warsaw Pact – has been sentenced to demolition. Isn’t that strange? We also find out that wow-architecture has made a comeback as a post-COVID trend. However, to make a truly powerful statement, professionals still remain indispensable.
Exposed Concrete
One of the stages of improving a small square in the town of Lermontov was the construction of a skatepark. Entrusting this part of the project to the XSA team, the city gained a 250-meter trick track whose features resemble those of land art objects – unparalleled in Russia in both scale and design. Here’s a look at how the experimental snake run in the foothills of the Caucasus was built.
One Step Closer To the Dream
The challenges of getting all the mandatory approvals, an insufficient budget, and construction site difficulties did not prevent ASADOV Bureau from achieving its main goal in the realization of the school project in the town of Troitsk – taking another step away from outdated notions of educational spaces toward creating a fundamentally new academic environment.
Chalet on the Rock
An Accor hotel in Arkhyz, designed by A.Len, will be situated at the gateway to the resort’s main tourist hubs. The architects reinterpreted the widely popular chalet style while adding an unexpected twist – an unfinished structure preserved on the site. The design team transformed this remnant into an exciting space featuring an open-air pool and a restaurant with panoramic views of the region’s highest mountain ridges.
Sergey Skuratov: “By and large, the project has been realized in line with the original ideas”
In this issue, we talk to the chief architect of Garden Quarters, looking back at the history and key moments of a project that took 18 years to develop and has now finally been completed. What interests us most are the transformations that the project underwent during construction, and the way the “necessary void” of public space was formed, which turned this remarkable complex into a fragment of a whole new type of urban fabric – not just at the horizontal “street” level but in its vertical structure as well.
A Unique Representative
The recently concluded year 2024 can be considered the year of completion for the “Garden Quarters” residential complex in Moscow’s Khamovniki. This project is well-known and, in many ways, iconic. Rarely does one manage to preserve such a number of original ideas, achieving in the end a kind of urban planning Gesamtkunstwerk. Here is a subjective view from an architecture journalist, with an interview with Sergey Skuratov soon to follow.
Field of Life
The new project by the architectural company PNKB (an acronym for “Design, Research, and Advisory Bureau”), led by Sergey Gnedovsky and Anton Lyubimkin, for the Kulikovo Field Museum is dedicated to the field as a concept in its own right. The field has long been a focus of the museum’s thorough and successful research. Accordingly, the exterior of the new museum building is gentler than that of its predecessor, which was also designed by PNKB and dedicated specifically to the historic battle. Inside, however, the building confidently guides the visitor from a luminous atrium along a spiral path to the field – interpreted here as a field of life.
A Paper Clip above the River
In this article, we talk with Vitaly Lutz from the Genplan Institute of Moscow about the design and unique features of the pedestrian bridge that now links the two banks of the Yauza River in the new cluster of Bauman Moscow State Technical University (MSTU). The bridge’s form and functionality – particularly the inclusion of an amphitheater suspended over the river – were conceived during the planning phase of the territory’s development. Typically, this approach is not standard practice, but the architects advocate for it, referring to this intermediate project phase as the “pre-AGR” stage (AGR stands for Architectural and Urban Planning Approval). Such a practice, they argue, helps define key parameters of future projects and bridge the gap between urban planning and architectural design.
Living in the Architecture of One’s Own Making
Do architects design houses for themselves? You bet! In this article, we are examining a new book by TATLIN publishing house. This book – unprecedented for Russia – features 52 private homes designed and built by contemporary architects for themselves. It includes houses that are famous, even iconic, as well as lesser-known ones; large and small, stylish and eccentric. To some extent, the book reflects the history of Russian architecture over the past 30 years.
A City Block Isoline
Another competition project for a residential complex on the banks of the Volga in Nizhny Novgorod has been prepared by Studio 44. A team of architects led by Ivan Kozhin concluded that using a regular block layout in such a location would be inappropriate and developed a “custom design” approach: a chain of parceled multi-section buildings stretching along the entire embankment. Let’s explore the features and advantages of this unconventional method.
Competition: The Price of Creativity?
Any day now, we’re expecting the results of a competition held by the “Samolet” development group for a plot in Kommunarka. In the meantime, we share the impressions of Editor-in-Chief Julia Tarabarina, who managed to conduct a public talk. Though technically focused on the interaction between developers and architects, the public talk turned into a discussion about the pros and cons of architectural competitions.
Terraced Design
The “River Park” residential complex has confidently and securely shaped the Nagatinsky Backwater shoreline. Featuring a public embankment, elevated courtyards connected by pedestrian bridges, and brick façades, the development invites exploration of its nuanced response to the surrounding context, as well as hints of the architects’ megalithic design thinking.
A Kremlin’s Core and Meteorite Fragments
We continue our coverage of the competition projects for the residential district that the development company GloraX plans to build along the embankment of the Rowing Channel in Nizhny Novgorod. ASADOV Architects approached the concept through a deep dive into local identity, using storytelling to pinpoint a central idea for the design: the master plan and composition are imagined as if a meteorite had struck a “proto-Kremlin”. Sounds weird? Find more details below!
The Volga Regatta
GloraX plans to develop a residential complex spanning 14 hectares along the Volga River in Nizhny Novgorod. The winning design in a closed-door competition, created by GORA Architects, features housing typologies ranging from townhouses to terraced high-rise slabs, a balance of functions, diverse ways of engaging with the water, and even a dedicated island (no less!) for the city residents.
Life Plans
The master plan for the residential district “Prityazheniye” (“Gravity”) in Naberezhnye Chelny was developed by the architectural company A.Len, taking into account the specific urban planning context and partially implemented solutions of the first phase. However, the master plan prioritized its own values: a green framework, a system of focal points, a hierarchy of spaces, and pedestrian priority. After this, the question of what residents will do in their neighborhood simply doesn’t arise.
A New Track
We took a thorough look at D_Station, a railcar repair depot dating back to 1906, recently reconstructed while preserving its century-old industrial structure, upon the project by Sergey Trukhanov and T+T Architects. Though work on the interiors – set to house restaurants and public spaces – is still underway, the building’s exterior already offers plenty to see. Visitors can explore the blend of old and new brickwork, appreciate the architect’s unique interpretation of ruin aesthetics, and enjoy the newly built pedestrian route that connects the Citydel Business Center’s arches to Kazakova Street.
Four Different Surveys
The “Explore the City” competition, organized this year by the Genplan Institute of Moscow, stands out as a pretty unconventional one for the architectural field but aligns perfectly well with the character of urban planning work. The winning project analyzed contemporary residential complexes, combining urban planning insights with a realtor’s perspective to propose a hybrid approach. Other entries explored public centers, motivations for car ownership, and housing vacancy rates. A fifth participant withdrew. Here’s a closer look at the four completed works.
Scheduled Evolution
ASADOV Architects unveiled the EvyCenter pavilion, a microcultural hub for fostering personal growth, organizing workshops, and doing gymnastics. Additionally, this pavilion serves as a prototype for a scalable country house, drawing inspiration from the “Loskutok” project, and constructed from CLT panels in a factory. This marks the beginning of a developer project initiated by the architectural firm (sic!), which is seeking partners to expand both small Evy settlements and even larger Evy cities, which are, according to Andrey Asadov, aimed at fostering the “evolutionary” development of the people who will inhabit them.
The Golden Crown
The concept for a dental clinic in Yekaterinburg, developed by CNTR Studio, revolves around the idea of a “mouth full of gold”: pristine white porcelain stoneware walls are complemented by matte brass details. To avoid an overly literal interpretation, the architects focused on the building’s proportions, skillfully navigating between sunlight requirements and fire safety regulations.
Flexibility and Integration
Not long ago, we covered the project for the fourth phase of the ÁLIA residential complex, designed by APEX. Now, we’ve been shown different fence concepts they developed to enclose the complex’s private courtyards, incorporating a variety of public functions. We believe that the sheer fact that the complex’s architects were involved in such a detail as fencing speaks volumes.
A Step Forward
The HIDE residential complex represents a major milestone for ADM architects and their leaders Andrey Romanov and Ekaterina Kuznetsova in their quest for a fresh high-rise aesthetic – one that is flexible and layered, capable of bringing vibrancy to mass and silhouette while shaping form. Over recent years, this approach has become ADM’s “signature style”, with the golden HIDE tower playing a pivotal role in its evolution. Here, we delve into the project’s story, explore the details of the complex’s design, and uncover its core essence.
Gold in the Sands
A new office for a transcontinental company specializing in resource extraction and processing has opened in Dubai. Designed by T+T Architects, masters of creating spaces that are contemporary, diverse, flexible, and original, this project exemplifies their expertise. On the executive floor, a massive brass-clad partition dominates, while layered textures of compressed earth create a contextually resonant backdrop.
Layers and Levels of Flight
This project goes way back – Reserve Union won this architectural competition at the end of 2011, and the building was completed in 2018, so it’s practically “archival”. However, despite being relatively unknown, the building can hardly be considered “dated” and remains a prime example of architectural expression, particularly in the headquarters genre. And it’s especially fitting for an aviation company office. In some ways, it resembles the Aeroflot headquarters at Sheremetyevo but with its own unique identity, following the signature style of Vladimir Plotkin. In this article, we take an in-depth look at the United Aircraft Corporation (UAC) headquarters in the Moscow agglomeration town of Zhukovsky, supplemented by recent photographs from Alexey Naroditsky – a shoot that became only recently possible due to the fact that improvements were finally made in the surrounding area.
Light and Shadow
In this article, we delve into the architectural design of the “Chaika” house by DNK ag architects, which was recently completed in 2023 as part of the collection of signature designs at ZILArt. As is well-known, all the buildings in this complex follow a design code, yet each one is distinct. This particular building stands out not only for its whiteness and minimalism but also for the refined use of a limited number of techniques that, together, create what can confidently be called synergy.
Casus Novae
A master plan was developed for a large residential area with a name of “DNS City”, but now that its implementation began, the plan has been arbitrarily reformatted and replaced with something that, while similar on the surface, is actually quite different. This is not the first time such a thing happens, but it’s always frustrating. With permission from the author, we are sharing Maria Elkina’s post.
Treasure Hunting
The GAFA bureau, in collaboration with Tegola and Arkhitail, organized an expedition to the island of Kilpola in Karelia as part of Moskomarkhitektura’s “Open City” festival. There, amidst moss and rocks, the students sought answers to questions like: what is the sacred, where does it dwell, and what sustains it? Assisting the participants in this quest were landscape engineer Evgeny Levin, artist Nicholas Roerich, a moose, and the lack of cellular connection. Here’s how the story unfolded.
Depths of the Earth, Streams of Water
In the Malaya Okhta district, the Akzent building, designed by Stepan Liphart, was constructed. It follows a classic tripartite structure, yet it’s what you might call “hand-drawn”: each façade is unique in its form and details, some of which aren’t immediately noticeable. In this article, we explore the context and, together with the architect, delve into how the form was developed.
Fir Tree Dynamics
The “Airports of Region” holding is planning to build an airport in Karachay-Cherkessia, aiming to make the Arkhyz and Dombay resorts more accessible to travelers. The project that won in an invitation-only competition, submitted by Sergey Nikeshkin’s KPLN, blends natural imagery inspired by the shape of a conifer seed, open-air waiting spaces, majestic large trees, and a green roof elevated on needle-like columns. The result is both nature-inspired and WOW.
​A Brick Shell
In the process of designing a clubhouse situated among pine trees in a prestigious suburban area near Moscow, the architectural firm “A.Len” did the façade design part. The combination of different types of brick and masonry correlates with the volumetric and plastique solutions, further enhanced by the inclusion of wood-painted fragments and metal “glazing”.