Contemplation at an Urban Farm

Urban development projects have created great disputes this September. But while magazines and bloggers are discussing Triumfalnaya Square comparing it to Krymskaya Embankment, the architects of WOWhaus bureau – pioneers in the field of transformation of Moscow public areas – have opened the first stage of their “Urban Farm” built in the previous summer. The project is typologically completely new for Moscow (although similar parks can be found in Podmoskovye). The farm is located in the far end of the exhibition center – near Likhoborskiy proezd and Selskohozyaystvennaya street, not far from the Botanical Garden metro station.

Not far from here, the Kamenka river that feeds a cascade of ponds coming down from Botanichesky Sad to the all-Russia exhibition center flows into the Yauza river forming a small pond behind the last dam – the 5th Kamensky pond. To the right, south of the pond, there used to be the “Hunting” pavilion that burnt in 2005 – it had a mini-zoo behind an arched façade, and now only two statues remain: “The Hunter” and “The Fox Breeder”. In the two last decades, this territory, as well as the whole northern part of VDNKh, has become a real back yard, a place of private residences, migrating barbecue stalls, saunas and restaurants that stock the ponds with fish offering the clients to catch the kill themselves for it to be cooked in the kitchen. One of such restaurants “The Trout River” used to be by the 5th Kamensky pond (the pond and the river-bed are separated here – it creates a double amusement). The administration of VDNKh closed the restaurant in 2014 and then invited the WOWhaus architects to discuss the territory.

zooming — Panorama. Urban farm at VDNKh, 1st phase. WOWhaus Bureau. Photograph © Dmitry Chebanenko

Having studied the location and surroundings the architects soon came to a conclusion that this part of VDNKh – unlike the center with its pavilions of republics and space – is sooner devoted to agriculture. They thought of the zoo in the Hunting pavilion and suggested making a farm – a kind of zoo where children could see domestic animals and learn to take care of them at various workshops. Such farms are common in Europe, but – as the architects say – though they are beautiful and natural, usually they are not interesting from the architectural point of view – and WOWhaus decided to create an “ideal farm”, clean, vast, convenient and cozy – exemplary, “like the whole VDNKh”. Which was done after the pre-draft and marketing research, carried out by the territorial transformation specialists of bureau KB23.

The main theme of the project is in fact the farm; it has become the core of the first stage and is almost built and inhabited: only the pigeons have not yet arrived at the pigeon-loft. But the goats, sheep, donkeys and miniature cows are already getting used to the warm cow-shed; the rabbits breed in the rabbit-warren; pedigree chicks, geese with aquiline noses and ducks with pretty topknots on their heads are swimming in the pond and breed in poultry houses. Near the pond, there is a big playground similar with the one that WOWhaus built in the Bauman Garden on Basmannaya street – it is equipped for children with health limitations, and is grouped along the axial ramp without ladders. The completed first stage of the farm has taken up a big northern part of the territory around the pond and the river. By the river, there supposed to be a “fishing zone” – a tribute to the memory of this place. Today you can get inside into the already opened Urban Farm through a small entrance pavilion on the side of the “Rabbit Breeding” pavilion (one ticket costs 200 roubles, and as the organizers say, the farm has got its first regular visitors).

The second stage – in the southern part of the territory with the future main entrance near the statues – is planned to be fully or partially implemented by December. This will be the place where functions completing the farm are to be grouped and that already echo with their miniature representatives in the completed part: a big café planned by the main entrance resembles the snack stand and the tent over some tables built on the bank of the pond; a green-house of the second stage – made up of three parts, with hydroponic cultures, flowers, exotic plants and with latticed facades reminding pineapple skin (as the authors say) – is assotiated with the mini kitchen-garden in the northern part, where fall rye, radish and strawberry sarments are already growing on the tall garden-beds. The future workshop zone with woodworking machines in the southern part is aligned with the “construction-site” playground where you can struck with a hammer or cut something out with a saw – it is planned to be opened soon. The authors of the project deliberately divided all the functions among the two construction stages, so that the first stage would be as full, varying and exciting as possible right now.

But let us return to the impressions from the constructed part. The small park takes up about one and a half hectares now, and its central part (excepting the warehousing area on the periphery of the lot) – even less, perhaps about a hectare, something in between a park and a garden. However, the level difference (one has to go down the stairs after the entrance), the pond and the river make the mini-park very diverse. The architecture of the pavilions is also designed to bolster the impressions: the pavilions designed by different architects of the bureau are all wooden but all – very different. During their demonstration to the journalists, the authors even talked about the difference of the houses built by men and women. There actually is a difference: one can feel the distinct “touches” and tricks joined by one material, but also however, the authorship of WOWhaus on the whole.

There is no symmetry and fanciness. All the constructions – even the most fundamental and weatherproof cow-shed and rabbit-warren – remain within the concept of light pavilion architecture. The concrete paths alternate with spots of bright white gravel, wooden bridges with benches are thrown to the two small islands in the pond, and the wooden planking lifted on supports and running across the river is densely equipped with rectangular projections – small docks that are apparently meant for fishing in the future. Everything is spread around the lot, permeable and latticed, the roofs are asymmetrical, the buildings tend to “dissolve” into space projecting forward terraces, roofs and bearers. The architecture poises on the edge of the pure esthetics of festival art, like “Goroda” and “Archstoyanie” – and the pavilion-park type construction that is more capital and of higher quality but still setting no boundaries and allowing to play on contrasts.

It is a pleasure to be in this thematic garden – and at the same time, it evokes multiple associations. The first one is figuratively the oldest – ideas of parks from the 18thcentury sentimentalism. Many people know that Marie Antoinette had her own farm in the Versailles park where she used to milk cows still wearing a crinoline. Goat milking for children at 1:45 pm at the urban farm is something similar: an attempt to bring people that are basically far from village life closer to farming. The urban farms in Europe actually originate from those ideas of the encyclopedists era, and the farm in Moscow indirectly inherits them. But still, they have a lot in common: on the one hand, there is the emphasized focus on naturalness and subdued colors – in particular – though for the City Day the ground was covered with roll out lawns – the authors say that there are clover and grass seeds under them, that will come up by next year and everything will look more natural. Some wooden constructions – such as the cow-shed and a small pavilion for workshops – are toned with taupe, and some spots of wood are left as they are; but then again, the authors hope that next year they will turn silvery grey. Now the authors call larch shingle and lath their favorite materials. They make up the cover of the peaked snack café that the workers call the “pencil” – and it does remind it, especially from a distance. The poultry-houses on the other bank of the pond have the same shape and finishing – echoing each other. The materials are preferred for their texture, warmth and natural character. They are also supposed to turn grey from rain-water. It makes us think of village houses – even though it is not straw, the lath is special here – it bears a powerful pastoral spirit and the figural essence of a farm.

On the other hand, no farm built in the wave a sentimental initiation of city-dwellers in nature looks like a real one. Which the authors also understand, directly admitting that familiarizing children with the cattle breeding industry is traumatizing and inhumane. Think about chicks on a conveyor belt – compared to them, the chickens and geese here are swans on Patriarshiye ponds. The farm looks more like a thematic mini-zoo; donkeys are being combed out every day. The miniature African cows with humps (just like camels have), give practically no milk but they look small and exotic. There is almost no smell – the ventilation is well conceived, nothing like the “Pig Breeding” pavilion that was such a shock for me when I was a child. In short, now that one of the main tasks of a city child about to go to school is to learn domestic animals and realize that there is also such cattle from a farmstead besides the cat, the hedgehog and the turtle – the farm gets to be very useful.

If, for a moment, we forget about Marie Antoinette’s proto-farm then the second most vivid association would be the EXPO world fair, still being held in Milan. This year it is dedicated to production of food – so basically to the same topic as the urban farm of WOWhaus. The similarities between the kitchen-garden here and the Slow Food project of Herzog and de Meuron are quite evident: starting from the strawberry and radish, shape of garden-beds – tall or hung up or built into the walls – and up to distinctive form of the bearers beaming upwards from one point. Yet, though there are plenty of greens at the EXPO in Milan, animals are only present on pictures.

World fairs –whose last theme partially matches the theme of the farm so well – were the prototype of Soviet exhibition of handicraft and industry, and here we appear to be directly influenced by the Moscow context. It is easy to notice that the “Urban farm” resembles a miniature copy of the agricultural part of VDNKh in many ways – leaving out the national pavilions but preserving the “handicraft” element, with cafes and entertainment. If you look carefully from the side of the cow-shed at the other side of the pond, you will see that the “pencil” is similar to a rocket, and the lifeguard stand is its launch tower pulled off to the other side of the river: here “we’ve got” one of the familiar symbols of Soviet achievements exhibition, but it is made of wood – like Polissky’s hadron collider as the image of an industrial symbol purposefully made of an inapt material.

But resemblance with the mini-VDNKh does not exclude another prototype – the wooden constructions of the farm remind the first exhibition of handicraft and industry, the All-Union Agricultural Exhibition, held in the place of Gorky Park (into which development WOWhaus has also put a great deal of effort which is also significant). A lot of things are recognizable: the tend to latticed constructions and studwork (or something of the kind), the variety of the authors’ styles and a kind of very conventional wooden classicism. The inevitably festive cow-shed – the biggest and warmest room with two asymmetrical gables and metal winding stairs leading to the balcony – reminds a basilica. The lifeguard stand reminds the “Makhorka” pavilion. The rhombic shed over the café looks like a Chipperfield peripter from the side of the river (this theme is quite popular in parks and WOWhaus has already had an experience in building such constructions), and from the side of the pond, due to the high lifted corner of the roof – reminds a portico reflected in water, almost completely classical, but at the same time very much in the spirit of VDNKh and the All-Union Exhibition – you can see it only from one angle, and moving forward you see it disappear, dispart. But the white color of the outer contour of the bearers in combination with natural wood helps to accent the classical theme – together it looks like a sort of wooden marble. The Stalin-time converter cubicle, also painted white and standing by the actual – unlike the café shed – doric columns also makes its contribution to the effect.

The whole view turns out to be not only exhibitional but also conventionally grange-like, especially thanks to the pond and islands. The portico of the shed is a mansion house, the pencil is an obelisk. Flowers in planters – placed in the bench backs at eye level like in the British Pavilion at EXPO – also have this country air, large and bright, not lavender and the popular grain varieties. The idea is captured – we really are in an urban village. The imagery, however, does not go beyond the limits. It does not turn into a stylization of either avant-garde, or something else. It remains within the frame of modern park stylistics.

So a farm has turned out to be a very sense bearing idea. That is, full of meanings that line up in a sequence starting from Marie Antoinette’s cows to the farming accents of the Soviet Expo – and then to the modern urban farms, educational amusement for children and to the eco-searches of our time presented in Milan. The idea is many times on trend. From the architectural point of view, the authors bring the somewhat pompous image of VDNKh to its wooden, half-avant-garde, half-neoclassical historical prototype – the All-Union Agricultural Exhibition, simultaneously adding their significant works in Moscow to this line. You can even look at it like this: the first exhibition of 1923 was held in the nepman and agricultural country, there was wood and laughter, almost like a fair; at those times most of the children came from rural areas. Then came the workers’ children, the children of the JRFs, children of white collars… And so, the exhibition moved and became more showy and pompous having shifted the “agricultural part” to the back yard and later having forgotten it altogether. “The Urban Farm” – a vaccination of the theme in the format of urban entertainment – wraps up the story in a playful fashion. Then again, luckily we do not know how the story will end yet. But it is nice to have a walk here. And in the evening everything lights up beautifully.

14 September 2015

Written by:
Julia Tarabarina
Translated by:
Anton Mizonov

Headlines now

Review

Living in the Architecture of One’s Own Making

Do architects design houses for themselves? You bet! In this article, we are examining a new book by TATLIN publishing house. This book – unprecedented for Russia – features 52 private homes designed and built by contemporary architects for themselves. It includes houses that are famous, even iconic, as well as lesser-known ones; large and small, stylish and eccentric. To some extent, the book reflects the history of Russian architecture over the past 30 years.

Object

A City Block Isoline

Another competition project for a residential complex on the banks of the Volga in Nizhny Novgorod has been prepared by Studio 44. A team of architects led by Ivan Kozhin concluded that using a regular block layout in such a location would be inappropriate and developed a “custom design” approach: a chain of parceled multi-section buildings stretching along the entire embankment. Let’s explore the features and advantages of this unconventional method.

Report

Competition: The Price of Creativity?

Any day now, we’re expecting the results of a competition held by the “Samolet” development group for a plot in Kommunarka. In the meantime, we share the impressions of Editor-in-Chief Julia Tarabarina, who managed to conduct a public talk. Though technically focused on the interaction between developers and architects, the public talk turned into a discussion about the pros and cons of architectural competitions.

Object

Terraced Design

The “River Park” residential complex has confidently and securely shaped the Nagatinsky Backwater shoreline. Featuring a public embankment, elevated courtyards connected by pedestrian bridges, and brick façades, the development invites exploration of its nuanced response to the surrounding context, as well as hints of the architects’ megalithic design thinking.

A Kremlin’s Core and Meteorite Fragments

We continue our coverage of the competition projects for the residential district that the development company GloraX plans to build along the embankment of the Rowing Channel in Nizhny Novgorod. ASADOV Architects approached the concept through a deep dive into local identity, using storytelling to pinpoint a central idea for the design: the master plan and composition are imagined as if a meteorite had struck a “proto-Kremlin”. Sounds weird? Find more details below!

Contest Results

The Volga Regatta

GloraX plans to develop a residential complex spanning 14 hectares along the Volga River in Nizhny Novgorod. The winning design in a closed-door competition, created by GORA Architects, features housing typologies ranging from townhouses to terraced high-rise slabs, a balance of functions, diverse ways of engaging with the water, and even a dedicated island (no less!) for the city residents.

Object

A New Track

We took a thorough look at D_Station, a railcar repair depot dating back to 1906, recently reconstructed while preserving its century-old industrial structure, upon the project by Sergey Trukhanov and T+T Architects. Though work on the interiors – set to house restaurants and public spaces – is still underway, the building’s exterior already offers plenty to see. Visitors can explore the blend of old and new brickwork, appreciate the architect’s unique interpretation of ruin aesthetics, and enjoy the newly built pedestrian route that connects the Citydel Business Center’s arches to Kazakova Street.

Report

Four Different Surveys

The “Explore the City” competition, organized this year by the Genplan Institute of Moscow, stands out as a pretty unconventional one for the architectural field but aligns perfectly well with the character of urban planning work. The winning project analyzed contemporary residential complexes, combining urban planning insights with a realtor’s perspective to propose a hybrid approach. Other entries explored public centers, motivations for car ownership, and housing vacancy rates. A fifth participant withdrew. Here’s a closer look at the four completed works.

Report

Scheduled Evolution

ASADOV Architects unveiled the EvyCenter pavilion, a microcultural hub for fostering personal growth, organizing workshops, and doing gymnastics. Additionally, this pavilion serves as a prototype for a scalable country house, drawing inspiration from the “Loskutok” project, and constructed from CLT panels in a factory. This marks the beginning of a developer project initiated by the architectural firm (sic!), which is seeking partners to expand both small Evy settlements and even larger Evy cities, which are, according to Andrey Asadov, aimed at fostering the “evolutionary” development of the people who will inhabit them.

Object

The Golden Crown

The concept for a dental clinic in Yekaterinburg, developed by CNTR Studio, revolves around the idea of a “mouth full of gold”: pristine white porcelain stoneware walls are complemented by matte brass details. To avoid an overly literal interpretation, the architects focused on the building’s proportions, skillfully navigating between sunlight requirements and fire safety regulations.

News

Flexibility and Integration

Not long ago, we covered the project for the fourth phase of the ÁLIA residential complex, designed by APEX. Now, we’ve been shown different fence concepts they developed to enclose the complex’s private courtyards, incorporating a variety of public functions. We believe that the sheer fact that the complex’s architects were involved in such a detail as fencing speaks volumes.

Object

A Step Forward

The HIDE residential complex represents a major milestone for ADM architects and their leaders Andrey Romanov and Ekaterina Kuznetsova in their quest for a fresh high-rise aesthetic – one that is flexible and layered, capable of bringing vibrancy to mass and silhouette while shaping form. Over recent years, this approach has become ADM’s “signature style”, with the golden HIDE tower playing a pivotal role in its evolution. Here, we delve into the project’s story, explore the details of the complex’s design, and uncover its core essence.

Object

Gold in the Sands

A new office for a transcontinental company specializing in resource extraction and processing has opened in Dubai. Designed by T+T Architects, masters of creating spaces that are contemporary, diverse, flexible, and original, this project exemplifies their expertise. On the executive floor, a massive brass-clad partition dominates, while layered textures of compressed earth create a contextually resonant backdrop.

Object

Layers and Levels of Flight

This project goes way back – Reserve Union won this architectural competition at the end of 2011, and the building was completed in 2018, so it’s practically “archival”. However, despite being relatively unknown, the building can hardly be considered “dated” and remains a prime example of architectural expression, particularly in the headquarters genre. And it’s especially fitting for an aviation company office. In some ways, it resembles the Aeroflot headquarters at Sheremetyevo but with its own unique identity, following the signature style of Vladimir Plotkin. In this article, we take an in-depth look at the United Aircraft Corporation (UAC) headquarters in the Moscow agglomeration town of Zhukovsky, supplemented by recent photographs from Alexey Naroditsky – a shoot that became only recently possible due to the fact that improvements were finally made in the surrounding area.

Object

Light and Shadow

In this article, we delve into the architectural design of the “Chaika” house by DNK ag architects, which was recently completed in 2023 as part of the collection of signature designs at ZILArt. As is well-known, all the buildings in this complex follow a design code, yet each one is distinct. This particular building stands out not only for its whiteness and minimalism but also for the refined use of a limited number of techniques that, together, create what can confidently be called synergy.

View

Casus Novae

A master plan was developed for a large residential area with a name of “DNS City”, but now that its implementation began, the plan has been arbitrarily reformatted and replaced with something that, while similar on the surface, is actually quite different. This is not the first time such a thing happens, but it’s always frustrating. With permission from the author, we are sharing Maria Elkina’s post.

Report

Treasure Hunting

The GAFA bureau, in collaboration with Tegola and Arkhitail, organized an expedition to the island of Kilpola in Karelia as part of Moskomarkhitektura’s “Open City” festival. There, amidst moss and rocks, the students sought answers to questions like: what is the sacred, where does it dwell, and what sustains it? Assisting the participants in this quest were landscape engineer Evgeny Levin, artist Nicholas Roerich, a moose, and the lack of cellular connection. Here’s how the story unfolded.

Object

Depths of the Earth, Streams of Water

In the Malaya Okhta district, the Akzent building, designed by Stepan Liphart, was constructed. It follows a classic tripartite structure, yet it’s what you might call “hand-drawn”: each façade is unique in its form and details, some of which aren’t immediately noticeable. In this article, we explore the context and, together with the architect, delve into how the form was developed.

Object

Fir Tree Dynamics

The “Airports of Region” holding is planning to build an airport in Karachay-Cherkessia, aiming to make the Arkhyz and Dombay resorts more accessible to travelers. The project that won in an invitation-only competition, submitted by Sergey Nikeshkin’s KPLN, blends natural imagery inspired by the shape of a conifer seed, open-air waiting spaces, majestic large trees, and a green roof elevated on needle-like columns. The result is both nature-inspired and WOW.

Object

A Brick Shell

In the process of designing a clubhouse situated among pine trees in a prestigious suburban area near Moscow, the architectural firm “A.Len” did the façade design part. The combination of different types of brick and masonry correlates with the volumetric and plastique solutions, further enhanced by the inclusion of wood-painted fragments and metal “glazing”.

Report

Word Forms

ATRIUM architects love ambitious challenges, and for the firm’s thirtieth anniversary, they boldly play a game of words with an exhibition that dives deep into a self-created vocabulary. They immerse their projects – especially art installations – into this glossary, as if plunging into a current of their own. You feel as if you’re flowing through the veins of pure art, immersed in a universe of vertical cities, educational spaces – of which the architects are true masters – and the cultural codes of various locations. But what truly captivates is the bold statement that Vera Butko and Anton Nadtochy make, both through their work and this exhibition: architecture, above all, is art – the art of working with form and space.

Object

Flexibility and Acuteness of Modernity

Luxurious, fluid, large “kokoshniks” and spiral barrel columns, as if made from colorful chewing gum: there seem to be no other mansion like this in Moscow, designed in the “Neo-Russian-Modern” style. And the “Teremok” on Malaya Kaluzhskaya, previously somewhat obscure, has “come alive with new colors” and gained visibility after its restoration for the office of the “architectural ecosystem” as the architects love to call themselves. It’s evident that Julius Borisov and the architects at UNK put their hearts into finding this new office and bringing it up to date. Let’s delve into the paradoxes of this mansion’s history and its plasticity. Spoiler: two versions of modernity meet here, both balancing on the razor’s edge of “what’s current”.

Interview

Yuri Vissarionov: “A modular house does not belong to the land”

It belongs to space, or to the air... It turns out that 3D printing is more effective when combined with a modular approach: the house is built in a workshop and then adapted to the site, including on uneven terrain. Yuri Vissarionov shares his latest experience in designing tourist complexes, both in central Russia and in the south. These include houseboats, homes printed from lightweight concrete using a 3D printer, and, of course, frame houses.

Object

Moscow’s First

“The quality of education largely depends on the quality of the educational environment”. This principle of the last decade has been realized by Sergey Skuratov in the project for the First Moscow Gymnasium on Rostovskaya Embankment in the Khamovniki district. The building seamlessly integrates into the complex urban landscape, responding both to the pedestrian flow of the city and the quiet alleyways. It skillfully takes advantage of the height differences and aligns with modern trends in educational space design. Let’s take a closer look.

Object

Looking at the Water

The site of Villa Sonata stretches from the road to the water’s edge, offering its own shoreline, pier, and a picturesque river panorama. To reveal these sweeping views, Roman Leonidov “cut” the façade diagonally parallel to the river, thus getting two main axes for the house and, consequently, “two heads”. The internal core – two double-height spaces, a living room and a conservatory, with a “bridge” above them – makes the house both “transparent” and filled with light.

Object

The White Wing

Well, it’s not exactly white. It’s more of a beige, white-stone structure that plays with the color of limestone – smoother surfaces are lighter, while rougher ones are darker. This wing unites various elements: it absorbs and interprets the surrounding themes. It responds to everything, yet maintains a cohesive expression – a challenging task! – while also incorporating recognizable features of its own, such as the dynamic cuts at the bottom, top, and middle.

Object

Urban Dunes

The XSA Ramps team designed and built a three-part sports hub for a park in Rostov-on-Don, welcoming people of all ages and fitness levels. The skate plaza, pump track, and playground are all meticulously crafted with details that attract a diverse range of visitors. The technical execution of the shapes and slopes transforms this space into a kind of sculptural composition.

Object

Proportional Growth

The project for the fourth phase of the ÁLIA residential area has been announced. The buildings are situated on an elongated plot – almost a “ray” that shoots out from the center of the area towards the river. Their layout reflects both a response to Moscow’s architectural preferences over the past 15 years, shifting “from blocks to towers”, and an interpretation of the neighboring business park designed by SOM. Additionally, the best apartments here are not located at the very top but closer to the middle, forming a glowing “waistline”.

Object

The “Staircase” Building

In designing the “Details” residential complex in New Moscow, Rais Baishev spiced up the now-popular Moscow theme of a “courtyard” building with an idea drawn from the surrealist drawings by Maurits Escher. He envisioned the stepped silhouettes and descending slopes as a metaphysical mega-staircase, creating a key void within the courtyard that gave the project an internal “spine”. This concept is felt both in the building’s silhouette and on its façades.

Object

Projection of the Quarter

No one doubted that the building that Vladimir Plotkin designed as part of the “Garden Quarters” would be the most modernist of all. And it turned out just that way: while adhering to the common design code, the building successfully combines brick and white stone, rhythmically responding to the neighboring building designed by Ostozhenka, yet tactfully and persistently making a few statements of its own. This includes the projection of the ideal urban development composition “14–9–6”, which can be found right next door, mathematical calculations, including those for various types of terraces (and perhaps the only reminder of the Soviet past of the Kauchuk rubber factory!), and the white “cross-stitch” pattern of the façade grid.