The project and the concept of the “Microcity “in the Forest” was already covered at our website. This comfort class housing estate is being built on Pyatnitskoye Shosse, four miles away from Moscow by Rose Group Company, on the draft of SPEECH bureau. This is an emblematic project both for Rose Group developer as well as for the architects. Rose Group Company, known for their elite housing development in Ostozhenka district, took up this project in 2011 in comfort-class segment, completely new for the company. It was also a challenge for the architects to make a humanized urban web: with quarter planning, shut yards, closed up from the cars, shops and cafes, not only on the ground floor, but especially on the boulevard. The boulevard will be built in the third building stage and is to become the center of social life, complementing the residential function with the commercial, cultural and recreational ones – which are all necessary for a valid urban environment.
The layout drawing of the “Microcity in the Forest” currently covers 100 hectares. It is designed for 35 000 people, two schools and three kindergartens. The construction is planned to be carried out in eight stages (the decision about the implementation of several projects will be made later, in accordance with the current general situation on the market – explains Rose Group). At this point, three multi-sectional houses of the first construction stage, one kindergarten and a school are ready and second stage houses are being built. This was all demonstrated to the journalists at the end of August.
It was raining heavily and Sergey Choban said as he came to the press-conference: “We were afraid that it could be too bright because in summer we would usually see the facades in the sun. But now I see that these colors can cheer you up in bad weather”.
The textured yellow spots of the aluminum panels, bent at different angles, really did seem especially attractive that day. They look like thick strokes of oil paint made by a palette knife on a white canvas; like impasto blemishes of the sun left on the façade, so that they would not get washed away by the frequent Moscow rain. The first stage facades, as is known, are designed by two Russian architectural bureaus: SPEECH and “Reserve”, and two German ones: AssmannSalomon AS and LANGHOF. The “sunny” spots were suggested by SPEECH, and they echo to the relief creases of the orange facades, designed by LANGHOF. The idea of contrasting zigzags and the relief, irregular hatching of the white balconies belong to “Reserve”. By the way, not all colors are sunny here: the grey-brown tones from AssmannSalomon and its blue propylaea houses guarding the entrance to the sixteenth building look unexpectedly serious. (by the way, “Reserve” inverted the color solution while working on the similar propylaea sections of the seventeenth building – so the volumes turned out to be paired negatives).
Each member of the project made two to four variants. But what is most interesting – the invitees didn’t design separate volumes of houses (as done in SPEECH’s “Gruenewald” project and Sergey Skuratov’s “Garden Quarters”). They worked on designing the facades of separate sections, which were then put together by the leading bureau – SPEECH – with accents on corner and final sections. In addition to every façade option, the authors designed the incoming groups and apartments that are sold with fine finish, painted walls, doors and finished wet units. All details, including the numbers on the apartments, are thought over and match the design if the whole section. So the clearly readable external individuality of every block soaks inside the volume, letting the dwellers easily identify their own part of the house, and, of course, the integrity of the design on the whole.
Besides, the sections are intentionally made of different height. Twelve- and fourteen-storey volumes irregularly alternate every second or third house – thus emphasizing the impression of a variety of houses standing in line. The gradation of the top line is intensified by the flanges of the technical floors, moved to the surface of the facades. The top line goes fancifully up and down, and then suddenly calms down and stretches along the horizon, echoing the variety of the facades.
In a word, the goal of the architects was to enrich the impression, in which they have definitely succeeded. It is fun to walk around counting the variants of combinations, noticing the ones that you have seen before or, on the contrary, the new ones. The developed technique is planned to be applied to the other construction stages as well. At least the facades of the second stage are already designed by the same Russian contestants – SPEECH and “Reserve”, and the new invitees – the German bureau Ortner&Ortner and the eccentric Briton William Alsop, who suggested to decorate the windows with styled colored flowers to pick up the theme of colored frames from the first construction stage, introduced by AsmannSalomon. One can see a certain polarization in the second stage: all the “brightness” is now gone to Alsop with the other three contestants suggesting a mixture of modernism and relative conservatism. It underlines the image of a town, made up of different buildings that turned up beside one another only by accident.
The dance of lines and colors is not the only special feature of this project. Nearly the most important peculiarity is the gridiron planning, proposed by the designers. Now that Sergey Kuznetsov – architect in chief for the last two years – insists on prioritizing the gridiron development over the micro-district open one, only a lazy or a short-sighted author would not call his project a block. In 2007, when it all only started the priorities were not that clear yet – although one must admit, that not only SPEECH was among the devotees of gridiron planning at that time: for instance, Bart Goldhorn promoted the same idea in his project A101 – and still the project of a large-scale gridiron development must be recognized as a certain manifesto.
Most of the houses on the master plan, except for the dozen towers of the boulevard – surround the large yards with their dense perimeter. The perimeter breaks as if unwillingly, giving away one, less frequently two sections. The defined rhythm of the large blocks is inscribed into a fairly flexible, but still stubbornly orthogonal scale.
We will remind you at this point that the first stage buildings – two blocks and an L-shaped house, about two times smaller and drawn back from the border of the lot – are the highest and the largest ones and stand closest to the highway. The sizes of the houses will be a bit smaller, only 10% maybe. Two full block-houses – buildings 16 and 17 – open in the middle, from the eastern side. The drop of the relief here forms wide front stairs, leading into the yard and framed with two propylaea sections and the openings into the underground parking. On the opposite, on the western side, there is an arch for letting a fire truck in (only for that purpose, since the yards are pedestrian). All the entrances and arches are concentrated round the central axis lining up like enfilade. It is expected that children will be able to play outside safely without their parents there.
The concept of the landscape improvement was developed by the Berlin St. Raum A bureau under the direction of Stefan Jackel and the Moscow “Ilya Mochalov and the Partners”. They also made up the operating documentation for the first stage and are now working on the second one.
The resulting yards have turned out to be equally far from the Stalinist architecture and the historical development of the 18-19 and even 20th centuries with a much smaller scale (Stalin’s houses on the avenues had 9-11 floors, yards from 86 000 to 160 000 square feet; guest houses on Liteyniy avenue had 4-5 floors, yards from 3000 to 8600 square feet; in Haussmann Paris or in the center of Rome there are even small yards of around 2000 square feet in the same 4-6-floor houses; in the “Microcity “in the Forest” we can see houses with 12-14 floors and with yards of 60 000 square feet).
As a result it turns out to be something in the middle: far from the historical city scale (as an example – the project “Dwelling Hybrid” by MVRDV, typologically a townhouse), but also significantly suppressing the “Hong Kong like” growing height up to thirty-forty floors, so typical in Moscow and Podmoskovye. The district came out to be just in the middle between these two poles.
The new blocks – neither big, nor small, but still perceptibly rather large volumes – became the main modulus in the project. The district will be made up of such houses, placed in groups and divided by very wide passages. Their volumes are solid, thick blocks. The various facades on the outside serve as a decoration that conceals the sizes, draws the viewer’s attention to it and even argues with the rigid regularity of the block structure. One can easily notice that all the facades are made asymmetrical – as if they are trying to swing the volumes, trying it out with large and small zigzags and the irregularly arranged spots and flanges. The vertically cut facades slightly remind the old medieval towns, divided into miniature sections and built up with versicolored – although similar – houses, where the vertical lines of the narrow facades emphasizes the stepped pediments. The centers of all Hanseatic cities (in Denmark, Netherlands and Poland) are built up that way. But in this case their image is not copied. It is sooner shown through a kaleidoscope: not a single pair of similar forms – though the idea is fairly transparent. It may be also considered that there is more similarity with the center of Istanbul, built up with the same vertical late modernistic facades. However, every resemblance stays no more than a hint, a fantasy of the viewer – an idea, rather than an image. Hence the clearest association with theatrical decorations for Anderson’s tale, staged in some experimental theatre disdaining the fairylike Christmas literalism.
Sharing about the dwelling complex the architect Sergey Kryuchkov confesses that “in the forest” must not be taken literally. The name misleads you, making you think that the city must be located somewhere in taiga. In fact it is not so. The surrounding territory is well lived-in: Mitino micro-district starts not far on the eastern side near Pyatnitskoye Shosse; to the west is the Otradnoye settlement – another dwelling complex is also being built there; but the nearest to the microcity is the clinic. The actual forest starts only two miles away – after Sinichka river surrounded by sanatoriums. The name has a different meaning: aiming to make the economy-class nevertheless comfortable the developers gave away about two quarters, keeping a fragment of forest parks inside the territory (the planting is managed by a Russian company Imperial Gardens).
It is notable that the forest is not the only peculiarity of the district: there is a number of important details meant to improve the quality of life and attract the dwellers. They were widely discussed at the press-conference. Besides, Rose Group underlines that it is essential that the new complex lives and functions – that it doesn’t become an investment purchase or a concrete lockbox (which is also new). A kindergarten is built according to projects of SPEECH: very vivid, composed of several colorful volumes with many perpendicular windows. The red-brick school with perspective frames round the windows and even on doors reminds the Tretyakov Gallery reconstruction project f the same authors. The kindergarten and school are markedly asymmetrical, in contrast to the square plans of the blocks, and their frons are uniform – unlike those of the residential buildings.
As the spokesmen of Rose Group and SPEECH said at the press-conference – there are no particular technical and service innovations, but many things were first used in comfort class, that are traditionally more elite. For example, all apartments are sold together with a place in the underground parking lot (the parking places on the ground floor are for guests and are located outside of the perimeter – the yards are pedestrian). The optical fiber channel laid in the houses can support telephone, door phone and the internet at the same time (and besides: the dwellers can choose between three competing providers). If desired, this connection allows to organize a full-fledged “smart house” system. The cars entering the parking are identified by a remote card reading system. Children will have similar cards at school. Door phones are located inside transparent tambours in front of the vestibules – so that the guests will not have to freeze while waiting outside. The ground floor is equipped with storages for baby carriages and bicycles. School will cost 10 000 rubles a month (which is a rather low price for private school – the average payment is 35 000 rubles – that was achieved in the agreement between the developers and the school operator). The school is only four minutes on foot away from the first stage houses. The dwellers, however, do not accept all novelties. For instance, many people are not happy about the lack of rubbish chutes: good thing that it does not smell in the stair well, but it is sometimes so convenient to throw garbage away just on your floor… Whether there will be some other improvement is not clear yet. The dwellers have not yet decided if they are ready to pay for it. If they turn out not to – the improvement will not go beyond grass on the lawns without any gardening luxuries.
Many of the enumerated small details, both architectural and domestic ones, respond to the very definition of comfort-class. You can feel how some critical elements are being step-by-step implanted, although it takes hard work and compromising. Starting from the compulsory parking place (that can later be sold) and the trimming of the apartments (that could be more easily remade) – to the whole image of the microcity aiming to refine the brutal Moscow views. Everything is close in this place: cottages, townhouses, sanatoriums, micro-districts, the big shopping mall and also the forest and the field. The “Microcity in “the Forest” fits in perfectly – and at the same time is completely different – joyous and clean. Well, typical middle class.
Living in the Architecture of One’s Own Making
Do architects design houses for themselves? You bet! In this article, we are examining a new book by TATLIN publishing house. This book – unprecedented for Russia – features 52 private homes designed and built by contemporary architects for themselves. It includes houses that are famous, even iconic, as well as lesser-known ones; large and small, stylish and eccentric. To some extent, the book reflects the history of Russian architecture over the past 30 years.
A City Block Isoline
Another competition project for a residential complex on the banks of the Volga in Nizhny Novgorod has been prepared by Studio 44. A team of architects led by Ivan Kozhin concluded that using a regular block layout in such a location would be inappropriate and developed a “custom design” approach: a chain of parceled multi-section buildings stretching along the entire embankment. Let’s explore the features and advantages of this unconventional method.
Competition: The Price of Creativity?
Any day now, we’re expecting the results of a competition held by the “Samolet” development group for a plot in Kommunarka. In the meantime, we share the impressions of Editor-in-Chief Julia Tarabarina, who managed to conduct a public talk. Though technically focused on the interaction between developers and architects, the public talk turned into a discussion about the pros and cons of architectural competitions.
Terraced Design
The “River Park” residential complex has confidently and securely shaped the Nagatinsky Backwater shoreline. Featuring a public embankment, elevated courtyards connected by pedestrian bridges, and brick façades, the development invites exploration of its nuanced response to the surrounding context, as well as hints of the architects’ megalithic design thinking.
A Kremlin’s Core and Meteorite Fragments
We continue our coverage of the competition projects for the residential district that the development company GloraX plans to build along the embankment of the Rowing Channel in Nizhny Novgorod. ASADOV Architects approached the concept through a deep dive into local identity, using storytelling to pinpoint a central idea for the design: the master plan and composition are imagined as if a meteorite had struck a “proto-Kremlin”. Sounds weird? Find more details below!
The Volga Regatta
GloraX plans to develop a residential complex spanning 14 hectares along the Volga River in Nizhny Novgorod. The winning design in a closed-door competition, created by GORA Architects, features housing typologies ranging from townhouses to terraced high-rise slabs, a balance of functions, diverse ways of engaging with the water, and even a dedicated island (no less!) for the city residents.
A New Track
We took a thorough look at D_Station, a railcar repair depot dating back to 1906, recently reconstructed while preserving its century-old industrial structure, upon the project by Sergey Trukhanov and T+T Architects. Though work on the interiors – set to house restaurants and public spaces – is still underway, the building’s exterior already offers plenty to see. Visitors can explore the blend of old and new brickwork, appreciate the architect’s unique interpretation of ruin aesthetics, and enjoy the newly built pedestrian route that connects the Citydel Business Center’s arches to Kazakova Street.
Four Different Surveys
The “Explore the City” competition, organized this year by the Genplan Institute of Moscow, stands out as a pretty unconventional one for the architectural field but aligns perfectly well with the character of urban planning work. The winning project analyzed contemporary residential complexes, combining urban planning insights with a realtor’s perspective to propose a hybrid approach. Other entries explored public centers, motivations for car ownership, and housing vacancy rates. A fifth participant withdrew. Here’s a closer look at the four completed works.
Scheduled Evolution
ASADOV Architects unveiled the EvyCenter pavilion, a microcultural hub for fostering personal growth, organizing workshops, and doing gymnastics. Additionally, this pavilion serves as a prototype for a scalable country house, drawing inspiration from the “Loskutok” project, and constructed from CLT panels in a factory. This marks the beginning of a developer project initiated by the architectural firm (sic!), which is seeking partners to expand both small Evy settlements and even larger Evy cities, which are, according to Andrey Asadov, aimed at fostering the “evolutionary” development of the people who will inhabit them.
The Golden Crown
The concept for a dental clinic in Yekaterinburg, developed by CNTR Studio, revolves around the idea of a “mouth full of gold”: pristine white porcelain stoneware walls are complemented by matte brass details. To avoid an overly literal interpretation, the architects focused on the building’s proportions, skillfully navigating between sunlight requirements and fire safety regulations.
Flexibility and Integration
Not long ago, we covered the project for the fourth phase of the ÁLIA residential complex, designed by APEX. Now, we’ve been shown different fence concepts they developed to enclose the complex’s private courtyards, incorporating a variety of public functions. We believe that the sheer fact that the complex’s architects were involved in such a detail as fencing speaks volumes.
A Step Forward
The HIDE residential complex represents a major milestone for ADM architects and their leaders Andrey Romanov and Ekaterina Kuznetsova in their quest for a fresh high-rise aesthetic – one that is flexible and layered, capable of bringing vibrancy to mass and silhouette while shaping form. Over recent years, this approach has become ADM’s “signature style”, with the golden HIDE tower playing a pivotal role in its evolution. Here, we delve into the project’s story, explore the details of the complex’s design, and uncover its core essence.
Gold in the Sands
A new office for a transcontinental company specializing in resource extraction and processing has opened in Dubai. Designed by T+T Architects, masters of creating spaces that are contemporary, diverse, flexible, and original, this project exemplifies their expertise. On the executive floor, a massive brass-clad partition dominates, while layered textures of compressed earth create a contextually resonant backdrop.
Layers and Levels of Flight
This project goes way back – Reserve Union won this architectural competition at the end of 2011, and the building was completed in 2018, so it’s practically “archival”. However, despite being relatively unknown, the building can hardly be considered “dated” and remains a prime example of architectural expression, particularly in the headquarters genre. And it’s especially fitting for an aviation company office. In some ways, it resembles the Aeroflot headquarters at Sheremetyevo but with its own unique identity, following the signature style of Vladimir Plotkin. In this article, we take an in-depth look at the United Aircraft Corporation (UAC) headquarters in the Moscow agglomeration town of Zhukovsky, supplemented by recent photographs from Alexey Naroditsky – a shoot that became only recently possible due to the fact that improvements were finally made in the surrounding area.
Light and Shadow
In this article, we delve into the architectural design of the “Chaika” house by DNK ag architects, which was recently completed in 2023 as part of the collection of signature designs at ZILArt. As is well-known, all the buildings in this complex follow a design code, yet each one is distinct. This particular building stands out not only for its whiteness and minimalism but also for the refined use of a limited number of techniques that, together, create what can confidently be called synergy.
Casus Novae
A master plan was developed for a large residential area with a name of “DNS City”, but now that its implementation began, the plan has been arbitrarily reformatted and replaced with something that, while similar on the surface, is actually quite different. This is not the first time such a thing happens, but it’s always frustrating. With permission from the author, we are sharing Maria Elkina’s post.
Treasure Hunting
The GAFA bureau, in collaboration with Tegola and Arkhitail, organized an expedition to the island of Kilpola in Karelia as part of Moskomarkhitektura’s “Open City” festival. There, amidst moss and rocks, the students sought answers to questions like: what is the sacred, where does it dwell, and what sustains it? Assisting the participants in this quest were landscape engineer Evgeny Levin, artist Nicholas Roerich, a moose, and the lack of cellular connection. Here’s how the story unfolded.
Depths of the Earth, Streams of Water
In the Malaya Okhta district, the Akzent building, designed by Stepan Liphart, was constructed. It follows a classic tripartite structure, yet it’s what you might call “hand-drawn”: each façade is unique in its form and details, some of which aren’t immediately noticeable. In this article, we explore the context and, together with the architect, delve into how the form was developed.
Fir Tree Dynamics
The “Airports of Region” holding is planning to build an airport in Karachay-Cherkessia, aiming to make the Arkhyz and Dombay resorts more accessible to travelers. The project that won in an invitation-only competition, submitted by Sergey Nikeshkin’s KPLN, blends natural imagery inspired by the shape of a conifer seed, open-air waiting spaces, majestic large trees, and a green roof elevated on needle-like columns. The result is both nature-inspired and WOW.
A Brick Shell
In the process of designing a clubhouse situated among pine trees in a prestigious suburban area near Moscow, the architectural firm “A.Len” did the façade design part. The combination of different types of brick and masonry correlates with the volumetric and plastique solutions, further enhanced by the inclusion of wood-painted fragments and metal “glazing”.
Word Forms
ATRIUM architects love ambitious challenges, and for the firm’s thirtieth anniversary, they boldly play a game of words with an exhibition that dives deep into a self-created vocabulary. They immerse their projects – especially art installations – into this glossary, as if plunging into a current of their own. You feel as if you’re flowing through the veins of pure art, immersed in a universe of vertical cities, educational spaces – of which the architects are true masters – and the cultural codes of various locations. But what truly captivates is the bold statement that Vera Butko and Anton Nadtochy make, both through their work and this exhibition: architecture, above all, is art – the art of working with form and space.
Flexibility and Acuteness of Modernity
Luxurious, fluid, large “kokoshniks” and spiral barrel columns, as if made from colorful chewing gum: there seem to be no other mansion like this in Moscow, designed in the “Neo-Russian-Modern” style. And the “Teremok” on Malaya Kaluzhskaya, previously somewhat obscure, has “come alive with new colors” and gained visibility after its restoration for the office of the “architectural ecosystem” as the architects love to call themselves. It’s evident that Julius Borisov and the architects at UNK put their hearts into finding this new office and bringing it up to date. Let’s delve into the paradoxes of this mansion’s history and its plasticity. Spoiler: two versions of modernity meet here, both balancing on the razor’s edge of “what’s current”.
Yuri Vissarionov: “A modular house does not belong to the land”
It belongs to space, or to the air... It turns out that 3D printing is more effective when combined with a modular approach: the house is built in a workshop and then adapted to the site, including on uneven terrain. Yuri Vissarionov shares his latest experience in designing tourist complexes, both in central Russia and in the south. These include houseboats, homes printed from lightweight concrete using a 3D printer, and, of course, frame houses.
Moscow’s First
“The quality of education largely depends on the quality of the educational environment”. This principle of the last decade has been realized by Sergey Skuratov in the project for the First Moscow Gymnasium on Rostovskaya Embankment in the Khamovniki district. The building seamlessly integrates into the complex urban landscape, responding both to the pedestrian flow of the city and the quiet alleyways. It skillfully takes advantage of the height differences and aligns with modern trends in educational space design. Let’s take a closer look.
Looking at the Water
The site of Villa Sonata stretches from the road to the water’s edge, offering its own shoreline, pier, and a picturesque river panorama. To reveal these sweeping views, Roman Leonidov “cut” the façade diagonally parallel to the river, thus getting two main axes for the house and, consequently, “two heads”. The internal core – two double-height spaces, a living room and a conservatory, with a “bridge” above them – makes the house both “transparent” and filled with light.
The White Wing
Well, it’s not exactly white. It’s more of a beige, white-stone structure that plays with the color of limestone – smoother surfaces are lighter, while rougher ones are darker. This wing unites various elements: it absorbs and interprets the surrounding themes. It responds to everything, yet maintains a cohesive expression – a challenging task! – while also incorporating recognizable features of its own, such as the dynamic cuts at the bottom, top, and middle.
Urban Dunes
The XSA Ramps team designed and built a three-part sports hub for a park in Rostov-on-Don, welcoming people of all ages and fitness levels. The skate plaza, pump track, and playground are all meticulously crafted with details that attract a diverse range of visitors. The technical execution of the shapes and slopes transforms this space into a kind of sculptural composition.
Proportional Growth
The project for the fourth phase of the ÁLIA residential area has been announced. The buildings are situated on an elongated plot – almost a “ray” that shoots out from the center of the area towards the river. Their layout reflects both a response to Moscow’s architectural preferences over the past 15 years, shifting “from blocks to towers”, and an interpretation of the neighboring business park designed by SOM. Additionally, the best apartments here are not located at the very top but closer to the middle, forming a glowing “waistline”.
The “Staircase” Building
In designing the “Details” residential complex in New Moscow, Rais Baishev spiced up the now-popular Moscow theme of a “courtyard” building with an idea drawn from the surrealist drawings by Maurits Escher. He envisioned the stepped silhouettes and descending slopes as a metaphysical mega-staircase, creating a key void within the courtyard that gave the project an internal “spine”. This concept is felt both in the building’s silhouette and on its façades.
Projection of the Quarter
No one doubted that the building that Vladimir Plotkin designed as part of the “Garden Quarters” would be the most modernist of all. And it turned out just that way: while adhering to the common design code, the building successfully combines brick and white stone, rhythmically responding to the neighboring building designed by Ostozhenka, yet tactfully and persistently making a few statements of its own. This includes the projection of the ideal urban development composition “14–9–6”, which can be found right next door, mathematical calculations, including those for various types of terraces (and perhaps the only reminder of the Soviet past of the Kauchuk rubber factory!), and the white “cross-stitch” pattern of the façade grid.