По-русски

Ivan Ovchinnikov: "Off-the-shelf mobile solutions are the way of life that I carry over to my architecture".

About the feasibility that gives you a competitive advantage, about life in the DoubleHouse, about the construction of MicroLoft, about the close of the festival era, and about the history of ArchFarm.

19 August 2014
Interview
mainImg

DoubleHouse. Photo courtesy by Ivan Ovchinnikov.

- At ArchiWOOD you went ahead and read out a sparking manifesto that was dedicated to DoubleHouse, one that probably even helped it to win in the popular vote. Could you please quote the main line of that manifesto?

- This was a manifesto of the "unpublished" category. I specifically prepared it for the vote in case somebody of my competition got the better of me - but never did have recourse to it. The main line probably was: "I am not asking you to vote for the author or for the project itself - I am asking you to vote for the very approach to the architecture and to countryside construction". And, to me, what is so special about this approach is its duplicability, accessibility, and its mass character. This is why I took an active part in the struggle for the popular vote, even though I never did this before. 

- Do you yourself believe in your manifesto? 

- Strange question! Why should I do this otherwise? Because DoubleHouse is not my first modular project and not my first project of compact housing. ArchPriyut ("ArchAsylum" - translator's note) - was quick-mount and feasible. Last year I organized "MicroHouse" Festival that also went a long a way to give birth to a lot of new ideas and the real experience in construction of quick-mount movable projects. A lot of our houses were built at ArchFarm, and then transported to Museon. 


DoubleHouse. Photo courtesy by Ivan Ovchinnikov.

- As for DoubleHouse - does it sell at all?

- I will be totally honest with you - our main challenge now is how to produce it, not how to sell it. A lot of our customers would like to buy it as early as this summer but presently our production facilities and their workload enabled us only to make one sales-demo project that actually sold at once - in fact, in ten days after its construction began. 

- Generally speaking, DoubleHouse is a beautiful idea: a ready house with all the communications and even furniture. We know, however, that in Europe such "traveling" houses are quite common, and they have a lot of modifications to them. Can you put your DoubleHouse into the European context? Is there anything that makes it different or does it recreate some western prototype? What did you proceed from? 

- Of course, it would be wrong to say that our DoubleHouse is unique and that it was born without the influence of any European analogues. I have always been interested in the phenomenon of compact housing, I have collected a large library on the subject, and, of course, at the moment of the birth of DoubleHouse, all I had to do was put my knowledge together to come up with a new image. As for the birth moment of this idea, it stands out in my memory quite vividly: this was at ArchMoscow 2013, where the FutteralHaus by Maxim Kurenny was first shown. I was really impressed with this idea but then, based on my experience and understanding some of the limitations of the modular "pull-out" project of FutteralHaus, I immediately came up with a different building structure that was not to be pulled out but that was to be put together out of two halves. Maxim, probably, won't even remember our dialogue: I said that I came up with an idea how his project could be improved. And he was like "And how?" To which I playfully answered: "I will first do it, then show it to you, and then we will compete!" Today we are friends with Maxim, we work together, and promote this thing in Russia. 

By the way, I am not making an accent on the mobility and the opportunity of moving from place to place. The quality of being modular provides an opportunity to assemble the house at the production facilities, raising its quality and lowering its cost, while its mobility is not that important, really: over this half a year nobody actually asked me about the possibility of a multiple move-over. DoubleHouse is the project that can be quickly assembled on your land site but it is not a trailer on wheels, after all. 


DoubleHouse in the process of assembly. Photo courtesy by Ivan Ovchinnikov.

- And if we are to compare it to the typical panelized house that have been popular at the Russian dachas since the 1980's, or to the cheap offers of today's Russian market? Is it true that DoubleHouse is more expensive? Did you study the market before you actually started, and what conclusions did you draw from that study? 

- Well, it's all pretty basic, really: the typical panelized houses require a lot of follow-up work - finishing, communications, furniture... Nobody ever gives a thought to the ultimate cost of the building, buying the sheer box, and the main resources are spent later on - countless trips to buy the finishing materials, figuring out where to house the workers, finding the electrician, the plumber, and such like. With DoubleHouse it's different - you buy it and you start living it. Just like with a car - you buy it and you drive it. Because you don't buy a car with no seats inside. 


DoubleHouse. Interior. Photo courtesy by Ivan Ovchinnikov.


DoubleHouse. Photo courtesy by Ivan Ovchinnikov.

- You mentioned Maxim Kurenny's Futteralhaus; this year, at ArchMoscow was showcased its new modification - FH_25. How many more Russian analogues do you know? 

- I do not know a single architect who would not at least once in his career propose to make a house "like in IKEA". There are many similar "paper" projects done by our Russian colleagues, a few projects are already searchable on the Internet and are offered for implementation but the end product was achieved only by me and Maxim. 

- You and your family, you live in a DoubleHouse. How long ago did you move there? Have you been able to run into any issues over such a test period? 

I've been living in my DoubleHouse on a permanent basis since December 2013. The main issues came up during the January frost when the water that ran along the outside walls froze. Now the project was has been fully redone, we hid all the layout and distribution behind the inside partition, so the water has no chance of freezing. Also, in my house I did not do the covered terrace and I now regret it - with a terrace, the house looks better, there is a place to sit outside when it rains, and you also need an awning above the entrance. Right now, I am testing my house in the "summer heat" mode - so far I am satisfied. 

- The all-purpose park pavilion "UPP" is also designed to be transported around. Are such off-the-shelf mobile solutions a specialty of BIO-architects? 

- This is also a way of life that I try to carry over to architecture, and the feasibility that gives me a competitive edge. 


All-purpose UPP module. Photo courtesy by Ivan Ovchinnikov.

- When was BIO-architects founded and how does it work? Do you have partners or such like?

- The bureau came into being at the time when all my social projects got shut down. I had long since been into architectural design and since 2011 I developed my own production facilities, but, while I only used to invest part of my time between the festivals and other programs, now I formalized my activities as an architectural bureau. For solving my architectural tasks I often turn to some other outsource architects: last year, for example, we did together a few joint projects with Leo Anisomov. The production questions are solved by a close-knit team that works on a permanent basis. I've got guys that help me deal with the organization issues - for example, the great girl Katie Geraskina helps develop the furniture branch, and largely because of her efforts we have recently united with other young design companies to form the Club of Industrial Designers. 

- Your furniture is very rectangular and laconic to the point of brutalism. The Three Bears (classic Russian folk fairy-tale - translator's note) would probably appreciate it... Is this a principle with you? You will insist on making rectangular stuff or maybe something else is also possible? 

- And you are putting too fine a point on it. I do have a furniture series that is made of massive construction timber - these babies will last for centuries. But I do the light stuff as well. For example, we have now pioneered making Russia's first furniture of LVL-timber, and it has no right angles or massive parts - just because this material "plays" in a totally different way particularly in the curvilinear shapes, and its transparency enables us to make light structures. 


Furniture. Photo courtesy by Ivan Ovchinnikov.


Furniture. Photo courtesy by Ivan Ovchinnikov.


Furniture. Photo courtesy by Ivan Ovchinnikov.


Production of furniture. Ivan Ovchinnikov is on the left. Photo courtesy by Ivan Ovchinnikov.


Production of furniture. Photo courtesy by Ivan Ovchinnikov.

- So, the festival period is over - what's next? Was MicroLoft your last festival project? (Where is it now, by the way?)

- I made a pause. Got some architectural "rehab". Nobody knows what's going to happen tomorrow. As for MicroLoft, it is now taken apart and lying in wait at my production facility near the city of Troitsk - I hope to assemble it there. 


MicroLoft in Museon. Photo courtesy by Ivan Ovchinnikov.


MicroLoft in Museon. Photo courtesy by Ivan Ovchinnikov.

- Why did you leave ArchFarm? Did you have any regrets about that? 

- It's ArchFarm that left Tula Region, not the other way around. It did so for a number of reasons, first of all, because further steady development became impossible there. Do I regret it? Not in the least! How can you regret the experience that you got? I hope that all the friends of ArchFarm also do not regret the time that they spent there. And as for the concept of ArchFarm, it is still alive - in my heart, and in the hearts of my friends. With God's help, one day ArchFarm will find a new venue where it will be implemented with regard to the acquired experience. 


Graffiti at the ArchFarm. Photo courtesy by Ivan Ovchinnikov.
 
zooming
zooming


19 August 2014

Headlines now
Living in the Architecture of One’s Own Making
Do architects design houses for themselves? You bet! In this article, we are examining a new book by TATLIN publishing house. This book – unprecedented for Russia – features 52 private homes designed and built by contemporary architects for themselves. It includes houses that are famous, even iconic, as well as lesser-known ones; large and small, stylish and eccentric. To some extent, the book reflects the history of Russian architecture over the past 30 years.
A City Block Isoline
Another competition project for a residential complex on the banks of the Volga in Nizhny Novgorod has been prepared by Studio 44. A team of architects led by Ivan Kozhin concluded that using a regular block layout in such a location would be inappropriate and developed a “custom design” approach: a chain of parceled multi-section buildings stretching along the entire embankment. Let’s explore the features and advantages of this unconventional method.
Competition: The Price of Creativity?
Any day now, we’re expecting the results of a competition held by the “Samolet” development group for a plot in Kommunarka. In the meantime, we share the impressions of Editor-in-Chief Julia Tarabarina, who managed to conduct a public talk. Though technically focused on the interaction between developers and architects, the public talk turned into a discussion about the pros and cons of architectural competitions.
Terraced Design
The “River Park” residential complex has confidently and securely shaped the Nagatinsky Backwater shoreline. Featuring a public embankment, elevated courtyards connected by pedestrian bridges, and brick façades, the development invites exploration of its nuanced response to the surrounding context, as well as hints of the architects’ megalithic design thinking.
A Kremlin’s Core and Meteorite Fragments
We continue our coverage of the competition projects for the residential district that the development company GloraX plans to build along the embankment of the Rowing Channel in Nizhny Novgorod. ASADOV Architects approached the concept through a deep dive into local identity, using storytelling to pinpoint a central idea for the design: the master plan and composition are imagined as if a meteorite had struck a “proto-Kremlin”. Sounds weird? Find more details below!
The Volga Regatta
GloraX plans to develop a residential complex spanning 14 hectares along the Volga River in Nizhny Novgorod. The winning design in a closed-door competition, created by GORA Architects, features housing typologies ranging from townhouses to terraced high-rise slabs, a balance of functions, diverse ways of engaging with the water, and even a dedicated island (no less!) for the city residents.
A New Track
We took a thorough look at D_Station, a railcar repair depot dating back to 1906, recently reconstructed while preserving its century-old industrial structure, upon the project by Sergey Trukhanov and T+T Architects. Though work on the interiors – set to house restaurants and public spaces – is still underway, the building’s exterior already offers plenty to see. Visitors can explore the blend of old and new brickwork, appreciate the architect’s unique interpretation of ruin aesthetics, and enjoy the newly built pedestrian route that connects the Citydel Business Center’s arches to Kazakova Street.
Four Different Surveys
The “Explore the City” competition, organized this year by the Genplan Institute of Moscow, stands out as a pretty unconventional one for the architectural field but aligns perfectly well with the character of urban planning work. The winning project analyzed contemporary residential complexes, combining urban planning insights with a realtor’s perspective to propose a hybrid approach. Other entries explored public centers, motivations for car ownership, and housing vacancy rates. A fifth participant withdrew. Here’s a closer look at the four completed works.
Scheduled Evolution
ASADOV Architects unveiled the EvyCenter pavilion, a microcultural hub for fostering personal growth, organizing workshops, and doing gymnastics. Additionally, this pavilion serves as a prototype for a scalable country house, drawing inspiration from the “Loskutok” project, and constructed from CLT panels in a factory. This marks the beginning of a developer project initiated by the architectural firm (sic!), which is seeking partners to expand both small Evy settlements and even larger Evy cities, which are, according to Andrey Asadov, aimed at fostering the “evolutionary” development of the people who will inhabit them.
The Golden Crown
The concept for a dental clinic in Yekaterinburg, developed by CNTR Studio, revolves around the idea of a “mouth full of gold”: pristine white porcelain stoneware walls are complemented by matte brass details. To avoid an overly literal interpretation, the architects focused on the building’s proportions, skillfully navigating between sunlight requirements and fire safety regulations.
Flexibility and Integration
Not long ago, we covered the project for the fourth phase of the ÁLIA residential complex, designed by APEX. Now, we’ve been shown different fence concepts they developed to enclose the complex’s private courtyards, incorporating a variety of public functions. We believe that the sheer fact that the complex’s architects were involved in such a detail as fencing speaks volumes.
A Step Forward
The HIDE residential complex represents a major milestone for ADM architects and their leaders Andrey Romanov and Ekaterina Kuznetsova in their quest for a fresh high-rise aesthetic – one that is flexible and layered, capable of bringing vibrancy to mass and silhouette while shaping form. Over recent years, this approach has become ADM’s “signature style”, with the golden HIDE tower playing a pivotal role in its evolution. Here, we delve into the project’s story, explore the details of the complex’s design, and uncover its core essence.
Gold in the Sands
A new office for a transcontinental company specializing in resource extraction and processing has opened in Dubai. Designed by T+T Architects, masters of creating spaces that are contemporary, diverse, flexible, and original, this project exemplifies their expertise. On the executive floor, a massive brass-clad partition dominates, while layered textures of compressed earth create a contextually resonant backdrop.
Layers and Levels of Flight
This project goes way back – Reserve Union won this architectural competition at the end of 2011, and the building was completed in 2018, so it’s practically “archival”. However, despite being relatively unknown, the building can hardly be considered “dated” and remains a prime example of architectural expression, particularly in the headquarters genre. And it’s especially fitting for an aviation company office. In some ways, it resembles the Aeroflot headquarters at Sheremetyevo but with its own unique identity, following the signature style of Vladimir Plotkin. In this article, we take an in-depth look at the United Aircraft Corporation (UAC) headquarters in the Moscow agglomeration town of Zhukovsky, supplemented by recent photographs from Alexey Naroditsky – a shoot that became only recently possible due to the fact that improvements were finally made in the surrounding area.
Light and Shadow
In this article, we delve into the architectural design of the “Chaika” house by DNK ag architects, which was recently completed in 2023 as part of the collection of signature designs at ZILArt. As is well-known, all the buildings in this complex follow a design code, yet each one is distinct. This particular building stands out not only for its whiteness and minimalism but also for the refined use of a limited number of techniques that, together, create what can confidently be called synergy.
Casus Novae
A master plan was developed for a large residential area with a name of “DNS City”, but now that its implementation began, the plan has been arbitrarily reformatted and replaced with something that, while similar on the surface, is actually quite different. This is not the first time such a thing happens, but it’s always frustrating. With permission from the author, we are sharing Maria Elkina’s post.
Treasure Hunting
The GAFA bureau, in collaboration with Tegola and Arkhitail, organized an expedition to the island of Kilpola in Karelia as part of Moskomarkhitektura’s “Open City” festival. There, amidst moss and rocks, the students sought answers to questions like: what is the sacred, where does it dwell, and what sustains it? Assisting the participants in this quest were landscape engineer Evgeny Levin, artist Nicholas Roerich, a moose, and the lack of cellular connection. Here’s how the story unfolded.
Depths of the Earth, Streams of Water
In the Malaya Okhta district, the Akzent building, designed by Stepan Liphart, was constructed. It follows a classic tripartite structure, yet it’s what you might call “hand-drawn”: each façade is unique in its form and details, some of which aren’t immediately noticeable. In this article, we explore the context and, together with the architect, delve into how the form was developed.
Fir Tree Dynamics
The “Airports of Region” holding is planning to build an airport in Karachay-Cherkessia, aiming to make the Arkhyz and Dombay resorts more accessible to travelers. The project that won in an invitation-only competition, submitted by Sergey Nikeshkin’s KPLN, blends natural imagery inspired by the shape of a conifer seed, open-air waiting spaces, majestic large trees, and a green roof elevated on needle-like columns. The result is both nature-inspired and WOW.
​A Brick Shell
In the process of designing a clubhouse situated among pine trees in a prestigious suburban area near Moscow, the architectural firm “A.Len” did the façade design part. The combination of different types of brick and masonry correlates with the volumetric and plastique solutions, further enhanced by the inclusion of wood-painted fragments and metal “glazing”.
Word Forms
ATRIUM architects love ambitious challenges, and for the firm’s thirtieth anniversary, they boldly play a game of words with an exhibition that dives deep into a self-created vocabulary. They immerse their projects – especially art installations – into this glossary, as if plunging into a current of their own. You feel as if you’re flowing through the veins of pure art, immersed in a universe of vertical cities, educational spaces – of which the architects are true masters – and the cultural codes of various locations. But what truly captivates is the bold statement that Vera Butko and Anton Nadtochy make, both through their work and this exhibition: architecture, above all, is art – the art of working with form and space.
Flexibility and Acuteness of Modernity
Luxurious, fluid, large “kokoshniks” and spiral barrel columns, as if made from colorful chewing gum: there seem to be no other mansion like this in Moscow, designed in the “Neo-Russian-Modern” style. And the “Teremok” on Malaya Kaluzhskaya, previously somewhat obscure, has “come alive with new colors” and gained visibility after its restoration for the office of the “architectural ecosystem” as the architects love to call themselves. It’s evident that Julius Borisov and the architects at UNK put their hearts into finding this new office and bringing it up to date. Let’s delve into the paradoxes of this mansion’s history and its plasticity. Spoiler: two versions of modernity meet here, both balancing on the razor’s edge of “what’s current”.
Yuri Vissarionov: “A modular house does not belong to the land”
It belongs to space, or to the air... It turns out that 3D printing is more effective when combined with a modular approach: the house is built in a workshop and then adapted to the site, including on uneven terrain. Yuri Vissarionov shares his latest experience in designing tourist complexes, both in central Russia and in the south. These include houseboats, homes printed from lightweight concrete using a 3D printer, and, of course, frame houses.
​Moscow’s First
“The quality of education largely depends on the quality of the educational environment”. This principle of the last decade has been realized by Sergey Skuratov in the project for the First Moscow Gymnasium on Rostovskaya Embankment in the Khamovniki district. The building seamlessly integrates into the complex urban landscape, responding both to the pedestrian flow of the city and the quiet alleyways. It skillfully takes advantage of the height differences and aligns with modern trends in educational space design. Let’s take a closer look.
Looking at the Water
The site of Villa Sonata stretches from the road to the water’s edge, offering its own shoreline, pier, and a picturesque river panorama. To reveal these sweeping views, Roman Leonidov “cut” the façade diagonally parallel to the river, thus getting two main axes for the house and, consequently, “two heads”. The internal core – two double-height spaces, a living room and a conservatory, with a “bridge” above them – makes the house both “transparent” and filled with light.
The White Wing
Well, it’s not exactly white. It’s more of a beige, white-stone structure that plays with the color of limestone – smoother surfaces are lighter, while rougher ones are darker. This wing unites various elements: it absorbs and interprets the surrounding themes. It responds to everything, yet maintains a cohesive expression – a challenging task! – while also incorporating recognizable features of its own, such as the dynamic cuts at the bottom, top, and middle.
Urban Dunes
The XSA Ramps team designed and built a three-part sports hub for a park in Rostov-on-Don, welcoming people of all ages and fitness levels. The skate plaza, pump track, and playground are all meticulously crafted with details that attract a diverse range of visitors. The technical execution of the shapes and slopes transforms this space into a kind of sculptural composition.
Proportional Growth
The project for the fourth phase of the ÁLIA residential area has been announced. The buildings are situated on an elongated plot – almost a “ray” that shoots out from the center of the area towards the river. Their layout reflects both a response to Moscow’s architectural preferences over the past 15 years, shifting “from blocks to towers”, and an interpretation of the neighboring business park designed by SOM. Additionally, the best apartments here are not located at the very top but closer to the middle, forming a glowing “waistline”.
The “Staircase” Building
In designing the “Details” residential complex in New Moscow, Rais Baishev spiced up the now-popular Moscow theme of a “courtyard” building with an idea drawn from the surrealist drawings by Maurits Escher. He envisioned the stepped silhouettes and descending slopes as a metaphysical mega-staircase, creating a key void within the courtyard that gave the project an internal “spine”. This concept is felt both in the building’s silhouette and on its façades.
Projection of the Quarter
No one doubted that the building that Vladimir Plotkin designed as part of the “Garden Quarters” would be the most modernist of all. And it turned out just that way: while adhering to the common design code, the building successfully combines brick and white stone, rhythmically responding to the neighboring building designed by Ostozhenka, yet tactfully and persistently making a few statements of its own. This includes the projection of the ideal urban development composition “14–9–6”, which can be found right next door, mathematical calculations, including those for various types of terraces (and perhaps the only reminder of the Soviet past of the Kauchuk rubber factory!), and the white “cross-stitch” pattern of the façade grid.