По-русски

Julius Borisov: “The “Island” housing complex is a unique project – we took it on with interest and excitement”

One of the largest housing projects of today’s Moscow – the “Ostrov” (“Island”) housing complex built by Donstroy – is now being actively built in the Mnevniky Floodplain. They are planning to build about 1.5M square meters of housing on an area of almost 40 hectares. We are beginning to examine this project– first of all, we are talking to Julius Borisov, the head of the architectural company UNK, which works with most of the residential blocks in this grand-scale project, as well as with the landscaping part; the company even proposed a single design code for the entire territory.

12 May 2023
Interview
mainImg
The residential complex “Ostrov” in Mnevnikovskaya Floodplain is a giant project of Donstroy Invest company. However, the floodplain itself is even bigger – the future residential complex does not occupy it entirely, but is located in the middle part of the drop-shaped territory surrounded by a bend of the Moskva River. There are overgrown green areas on the sides, future parks and several construction sites. The “Island” is adjacent to the river in the northern part, where two blocks, 1 and 4, are located near the water; to the west of the territory several sports facilities have either already been built or are under construction, including the Tatiana Navka Ice Palace, a building with an artificial wave and an outdoor stadium. In the northeastern part of the floodplain, near the Mnevniki subway station, plans for the Parliamentary Center, which has been talked about since 2015, seem to still be lukewarm; but little is known.

The residential complex, however, is not just famous – it is developing very rapidly around another new metro station, Terekhovo. Construction and design are underway here. The area of the territory of the complex is 36.6 hectares, the total area of everything that is planned to be built is about 1.5 million square meters, which is a lot – in fact, it is the size of a whole city. The location of the complex is positioned like this: the developer doesn’t hide the closed nature of the territory and considers it an advantage – an “island” separated from the city (even though it is a peninsula, of course) surrounded by the river and greenery. Everyone has probably seen the ad displaying the water “bagel”; we'll come back to it later. Another repeatedly marketed feature of the project is the attention to modern technology and energy efficiency – there are planned drone stations, G5 Internet and other technical innovations.

Ostrov housing complex
Copyright: © UNK


In 2020, the British company LDA+ proposed a master plan for the development of the area (we will remind you at this point that in 2015 they also worked with the original plan of “Serp i Molot”). Then, however, the economic performance indicators of the future residential complex grew significantly, and the master plan was no longer relevant. The development of the area began with two blocks: number 1 in the northwestern part near the river (it was designed by APEX) and number 2 in the center (authored by Gorproekt and Filip Nikandrov). Then, around the end of 2021, Julius Borisov’s UNK was invited to comprehend the area as a whole and to design the next five blocks. The task was a large-scale one, and they had only nine months to complete it.

At first, the project was developing in secrecy, with only individual pictures “leaking out” through the mailing lists of industry agencies. Now we can talk about it relatively freely, sales are open, presentations have been made. Since the project is very big and UNK worked not only on the architecture of the districts, but also proposed the entire public landscape and the concept of evening lighting – we decided to talk about it in a mixed format. We will start with an interview with Julius Borisov and talk about the individual projects, one of which covers the landscape solutions and the other one the whole complex lighting – they were developed by UNK Landscape and UNK Lighting respectively; we also plan to cover some of the city blocks individually. 

Archi.ru
What was the hardest part?

Julius Borisov, UNK:
The hardest part was the rate of our work, which required self-organization skills we never thought we possessed. Another difficulty was the gigantic scale – this is a city area the size of an average European city. In a word, this was a unique task, and we love any unconventional tasks, so we took it on with interest and even with excitement.

In addition, I have to say that I’m a fan of the Khamovniki and Luzhniki districts. I live there, I grew up there, I worked on the Aquatics and Martial Arts Center... It seems to me that the Khamovniki floodplain is similar in many ways to the place that we worked with, of course, with the significant difference that it is not built up yet. It is a bend of the Moskva River, from here there is a splendid view of the other side, one bank is flat, the other is steep. I studied the development history of Khamovniki, there are a lot of interesting coincidences. On the other hand, Mnevniki is a natural area – there are not many of them left in Moscow. It required a very careful approach, and that is also a unique task.

What is the main idea of your project?

Our main message is that we left nothing to chance, no part of our project is accidental. Our other message is partially opposite to the main one: you cannot come down to standardization and standardized solutions. We tried to balance on the verge between variations and a common design code – we did not look to create a semblance of a historical city, which has developed consistently and for a long time, we do very well realize that in our case this is not practicable – but we did want to avoid monotony and create a recognizable “face” of this area.

The idea to invite other architectural companies to work on the project – was it yours or was it your client’s? Who selected coauthors? Did you get along well?

The idea was ours, and the client supported it. I think this is the right approach globally, we are in line with the right trends, and we know a lot of such joint projects. I chose the partners; we have known each other for a long time; besides, we proceeded from the current availability of our colleagues. I must say that because we had to work very quickly and also because we all know each other well, the interaction was not particularly formalized; we worked as a team and there was not much difference between “external” and “internal”.

"Ostrov« (»Island") housing complex. Block #4
Copyright: © Laptev and partners / provided by UNK


"Ostrov« (»Island") housing complex. Block #5
Copyright: © ASADOV Architects / provided by the press service of Moskomarkhitektura

 
Ultimately, however, it was us who was responsible for the end result; we defined the main parameters, the massing, the general principles, and interacted closely and constantly. There were, of course, improvisations, but my “dictatorship” was quite rigid.

What other means did you use to achieve diversity, and how did you implement common features?

One thing that was helpful was the diversity of typology; each block had its own parameters in terms of height and density. For example, Block 3 is a high-end residential development: it is low-rise and it has a higher class of housing.

"Ostrov« (»Island") housing complex. Block #3
Copyright: © UNK


Here, in response to a request from potential customers and our client, we chose the theme of a conditional “Versailles in a modern London version”: the house is symmetrical, its facades are distinguished by a great deal of complexity, although without direct stylization, it has an attic floor with terraces, it combines fiber concrete of limestone color with cladding of copper shade – it is not a powder coating, we went through about 80 samples, and we selected the shade and texture so that the surface resembles natural copper and was durable; I purposefully flew to London, and looked at the Foster building…

  • zooming
    1 / 6
    "Ostrov« (»Island") housing complex. Block #3
    Copyright: © UNK
  • zooming
    2 / 6
    "Ostrov« (»Island") housing complex. Block #3
    Copyright: © UNK
  • zooming
    3 / 6
    "Ostrov« (»Island") housing complex. Block #3
    Copyright: © UNK
  • zooming
    4 / 6
    "Ostrov« (»Island") housing complex. Block #3
    Copyright: © UNK
  • zooming
    5 / 6
    "Ostrov« (»Island") housing complex. Block #3
    Copyright: © UNK
  • zooming
    6 / 6
    "Ostrov« (»Island") housing complex. Block #3
    Copyright: © UNK

 
The house allowed us to diversify the palette of the complex as a whole, it served as a kind of starting point. In all the other neighborhoods, both relatively reserved and futuristic, we used light beige, white, black and copper tones throughout. We wanted a kind of “musical theme” within which each block develops a story of its own.

For example, Block 6, which is located near Block 3, yet is closer to the city center and the metro station, is very dense, and the housing in it is less expensive than in the neighboring high-end house; you could say that this is designed for young people and young families. In addition, it has a kindergarten in it. We decided to develop the “gameplay” theme – this is how these large cutaways appeared, very much in the spirit of LEGO or Minecraft. These cutaways are situated on the “sight beams”, and they help to reveal a few beautiful views. The silhouette becomes more sophisticated, this helps to avoid excessive simplicity and the “crate” effect. I don’t like crates – a building must have a recognizable image.

  • zooming
    1 / 8
    "Ostrov« (»Island") housing complex. Block #6
    Copyright: © UNK
  • zooming
    2 / 8
    "Ostrov« (»Island") housing complex. Block #6
    Copyright: © UNK
  • zooming
    3 / 8
    "Ostrov« (»Island") housing complex. Block #6. The facades of Building 1 in axes 1.1-1.9, 1.9-1.1, 1.А-1.Г, 1.Г-1.А
    Copyright: © UNK
  • zooming
    4 / 8
    "Ostrov« (»Island") housing complex. Block #6. The facades of Building 1 in axes 2.1-2.8, 2.8-2.1, 2.Г-2.А, 2.А-2.Г
    Copyright: © UNK
  • zooming
    5 / 8
    "Ostrov« (»Island") housing complex. Block #6. The facades of Building 1 in axes 3.1-3.9, 3.9-3.1, 3.Д-3.А, 3.А-3.Д
    Copyright: © UNK
  • zooming
    6 / 8
    "Ostrov« (»Island") housing complex. Block #6. The facades of Building 1 in axes 4.1-4.20, 4.20-4.1
    Copyright: © UNK
  • zooming
    7 / 8
    "Ostrov« (»Island") housing complex. Block #6
    Copyright: © UNK
  • zooming
    8 / 8
    "Ostrov« (»Island") housing complex. Block #6
    Copyright: © UNK


However, the neighboring quarters, the third and sixth, were very different, and I had to tie them together somehow... Then I drew the tallest tower of the sixth quarter myself. Its scale and considerable height “belong” to the sixth quarter, and the detailing of the openwork copper facade, as well as the “crown” in the upper part, line up with the high-end club house I mentioned earlier, its elaboration and its attic. For some, it evokes classical associations, for others oriental ones.

"Ostrov« (»Island") housing complex. Block #6
Copyright: © UNK


"Ostrov« (»Island") housing complex. Block #6
Copyright: © UNK


"Ostrov« (»Island") housing complex. Block #5
Copyright: © ASADOV Architects / provided by the press service of Moskomarkhitektura


Another task was to coordinate the pattern of the openwork copper lattice with the grid of windows – it took some effort, but we did it. And on the opposite side we also managed to build an ensemble, which is not often the case in modern urban development.

How exactly did you achieve that?

According to the brief, the sixth block, which was designed by ASADOV architects, was to have a shopping mall in it. We searched for a solution for quite a long time, but we couldn’t find the right place for it. Help came from Alexander Asadov – he suggested that we rotate the shopping mall, placing it not parallel but perpendicular to the boulevard. Once we did that, everything fell into place: the rectangle of the mall occupied the space between the two central blocks, the sixth and fifth, and we put three towers at the ends of the two sites, facing each other. The result was a three-dimensional coherence, a choreographed urban planning solution, a real center, high-density and symmetrical, next to the subway station.

"Ostrov« (»Island") housing complex. The concept of architectural lighting
Copyright: © UNK


In addition, a very important role in integrating the space of the entire complex was played by the project lighting, the design code which we developed for the entire complex, and the landscape of the public areas – both projects were handled by companies belonging to the system of UNK, UNK Lighting and UNK Landscape. 

"Ostrov« (»Island") housing complex. Block #6
Copyright: © UNK


Speaking about the landscape – is the central boulevard also a part of the housing complex? Why is it so straight?

It is so straight because a subway line runs directly underneath it, and, as you may expect, this land is municipal – there are lots of boundaries there; the land that is closer to the buildings belongs to the complex, but the boulevard is municipal. But we did our best to visually smooth out the borders and make the boulevard an organic part of the complex. And we paid maximum attention to the part of the city that is perceived directly by a person, a pedestrian. We have a lot of galleries in the shopping streets, we have implemented a “dry feet” approach, which allows you to move within a block without getting your shoes wet. It should be easy and pleasant to walk in the city.

"Ostrov« (»Island") housing complex. Block #3
Copyright: © UNK


"Ostrov« (»Island") housing complex. Block #3
Copyright: © UNK




However, the landscaping and lighting projects will best be described and explained by their authors, the leaders of the divisions.

Is the Island housing complex your largest project so far?

If you consider it as a single whole, then it is, especially if you speak about the project stage. We also have large-scale projects in Yuzhno-Sakhalinsk; they have large areas, but the sum of square meters in Ostrov is larger.

12 May 2023

Headlines now
Home Base
Working on the new building for Letovo Junior School – opened to students in autumn 2025 in the MSU Valley – the architects of UNK, following the client’s vision, subordinated both façades and interiors to the theme of “home”. Multiple variations of pitched roofs, a city skyline traced across glass balustrades, wooden textures, and a whole series of micro-spaces for retreat within public areas are all at the disposal of primary and middle school students. We take a closer look at the new school building – and at how it interprets current trends in educational environments.
Doubles Match
The architecture of the Tennis Palace built in Luzhniki Olympic Complex, designed by Arena Design Institute, was shaped by three factors: the proximity of the brutalist Druzhba Arena, the closeness of the Moskva River and the metro bridge overpass, as well as the specifics of the function – tennis courts require large spans, abundant light, yet at the same time protection from direct sunlight. The architects divided the building into several blocks, playing on contrast, which is further emphasized by the façades developed in collaboration with TPO Reserve and Vladimir Plotkin.
Microdynamics of Macroprocesses
Given the proximity of the multifunctional complex SOLOS to Sokolniki Park and to a major transport hub, Kleinewelt Architekten embedded in the design of the two high-rise towers a sense of dynamism more characteristic of natural phenomena than of man-made objects. Without the authors’ diagrams, this logic is not easy to decipher, although the eye immediately detects a pattern and tries to grasp it. It seems to us that one tower contains the impulse of a bud about to open, while the other evokes the movement of a lithospheric plate. Let us try to unravel it together.
The Space of Post-Cubism
Sergei Tchoban and Alexandra Sheiner, of Studio CHART, created for the exhibition of “post-cubist” sculpture by Beatrice Sandomirskaya – a talented and even “mainstream” artist, yet almost unknown even to art historians – a space akin to her sculptural language: solidly built, confidently stereometric, and subtly expressive. It curves, emphasizing the mass of the sculpture, envelops the viewer, and guides them from one perspective to another, from a generic “shrine” to a “Madonna”.
The Value of Open Space
For the site near the Barrikadnaya Metro Station, Sergey Skuratov developed five projects between 2020 and 2025. Two of them were ones that won the client’s invitation-only competitions. The fifth was recently selected by the Mayor of Moscow for implementation. The project is vivid and sculptural, expressive, eye-catching, and engaging – very much in line with the spirit of our time. And yet, this project is mid-rise rather than tall. In its northwestern part, near the metro and Druzhinnikovskaya Street, it shapes a comfortable urban environment. On the opposite side, it opens up, allowing sunlight into the courtyard and creating a spatial pause within the dense city fabric. How it is organized, what geometric principles underlie it, and why it takes this form – all this is explored in our article.
Coming From the Cold
The ArchBukhta Festival remains one of the few events in Russia where participants go through the entire process of creating an architectural object – from concept to construction. And they do so on the shores of Lake Baikal, in dedication to it. This year, GAFA took part and shared its experience: a local legend, a team-specific design code, friendship, as well as ice skating and endurance in freezing temperatures all contributed to gaining something more than just an award.
Symphony of Water and Brick
The Alter residential complex, designed by Stepan Liphart and built on a bend of the Okhta River, is an example of a “drawn house”: the number of original architectural details is virtually immeasurable. As a result, ribs, projections, and recesses create a picturesque silhouette even without a significant variation in height. Both composition and material respond to the proximity of the river and to the red-brick factory building dating back to the early 20th century. The project was also significantly shaped by recommendations from the city’s chief architect. More details in our article.
The Penguin House
The building with a curved façade on Brestskaya Street is one of the manifestos of Russian neomodernism of the early 2000s, a sculpture – this is how Anatoly Belov interprets it, speaking of “breaking from the modernist canon and the contextual approach”. We do not fully agree with the author, but his perspective is an interesting one.
Wave and Vertical
The premium residential complex designed by GAFA for a site in the Khoroshevsky District responds to multiple constraints – the arc of a planned roadway, the water protection zone of the Khodynka River, and insolation requirements – through inventive massing. The composition is built on the interplay of two spatial layers: an elongated perimeter block and three towers concealed behind it generate the silhouette and key viewpoints, while also adding semantic depth reinforced by the façade solutions. Another defining feature is a large private courtyard, complemented by a citywide linear park.
Office on Trubnaya
We continue publishing projects by Valery Kanyashin. A building once described, a quarter century ago, as an example of “quiet modernism” has remained just that in some people’s memory. According to Anatoly Belov, its main quality is its unobtrusiveness. The architects from Ostozhenka say the leading role here is played by context and landscape – the change in elevation. Yet is it really so inconspicuous?
The First International
With this publication, we begin a series of texts dedicated to works by the late Valery Kanyashin, one of the founders of Ostozhenka Architects. As it happens, the projects he was involved in largely illustrate our understanding of the firm and its history. The first project in this series is the International Moscow Bank on Prechistenskaya Embankment.
In Memory of Valery Kanyashin
On Friday, February 27, architect Valery Kanyashin passed away – co-founder of Ostozhenka Architects and the author of many significant buildings in Moscow. We publish a text by Anatoly Belov in memory of Valery Kanyashin.
Hypertext in Space
As part of the exhibition “What We Have We (Do Not) Keep”, Sergey Tchoban, the Museum of Architecture, and the CHART studio experiment with an eco-conscious approach to exhibition design, with thematic cross-references and even with publicistic reflections on the necessity of preserving modernism, the roots of contemporary architecture, and the birth of ideas. All of this makes the exhibition, with its light and transparent design, look quite innovative. The elements – both “material” and conceptual – are familiar, yet their combination is far from conventional.
The Outline of “Foundation”
In their competition proposal for the Fili transport hub, the consortium led by Alexey Ilyin proposed an “inhabited arch” – a form that is simple yet complex. The architects emphasize that even at the competition stage, the project’s feasibility was fully calculated, taking into account the minimal nighttime closures of Bagration Avenue. How was this achieved? With what functions? Let us take a closer look. In our view, the building would have suited the heroes of Isaac Asimov’s Foundation novels perfectly.
The Flying Horizontal
“A house in the spirit of Wright”, as architect Roman Leonidov describes it, pointing to his source of inspiration, was built on a challenging wedge-shaped site. To achieve a sense of intimacy and secure good views from the windows, the entire volume had to be shifted toward the far boundary, turning the house “back” to the neighboring mansions. The main façade demonstrates time-tested techniques often employed by the company: articulated horizontals, a weightless roofline, and a triad of materials – light plaster, dark slate, and warm wood.
Needles of Horizon Contemplation
The “House of Horizons”, designed by Kleinewelt Architekten in Krylatskoye, is carefully thought out at the stereometric level – from the logic of how the volumes interlock (and, conversely, how gaps are articulated between them) to the triangular balconies that give the building its striking, slightly bristling silhouette.
The Red Thread
A linear park project prepared by Alexey Ilyin studio for the improvement of a riverbank in one of the residential districts seeks to reconnect people with nature. Two levels of the embankment invite visitors to contemplate the landscape while at the same time protecting the riverbank from excessive human impact. The “aerial street” links functional zones and the opposite banks, creating new points of attraction along the way: balconies, bridges, and even a “grotto”.
Spindle and Thread
The concept of the Waver residential complex in Yekaterinburg draws inspiration from the past of the Parkovy district. In order to preserve the memory of the late-19th-century flax spinning mill once located here, the architectural company KPLN turns to the theme of textiles and weaving. The project’s main expressive device is a system of ribbons made of perforated weathering steel – a material that, in such volumes, has arguably not yet been used in Russian residential projects.
From Ski Resorts to Year-Round Recreation Clusters
In mid-December, several architectural firms gathered to discuss a “seasonal” topic: the prospects for the development of domestic ski tourism. Where is modern infrastructure already in place, where do only remnants of the Soviet legacy remain, and where is there still nothing – but projects are underway and soon to be completed? This article explores these questions.
Woven Into Sokolniki
Over the past few years, high-rise residential construction in former industrial zones has become the main theme of Moscow architecture. Towers are springing up here and there – but the question is what kind of towers they are. The residential complex CODE Sokolniki, designed by Ostozhenka Architects, is a project where every detail has been taken care of. The authors are attentive to the history of the site, the continuity of the urban fabric, the skyline, and visual corridors. They also proposed a motif with the lyrical name “scarf”. We take a closer look at the volumetric composition and the large-scale décor “woven”, in this case, out of terraces and balconies.
Stepan Liphart and Yuri Gerth: “Our Program Is Aesthetic”
The studio of Stepan Liphart, an architect known for his distinctive signature style and one-off projects, now has a partner. Yuri Khitrov, a specialist with a broad range of competencies, will take on the part of the work that distracts one from creativity but drives the business forward. One of the aims of this partnership is to improve the urban environment through dialogue with clients and officials. We spoke with both sides about their ambitions, the firm’s development strategy, shared values, and the need for pragmatism. And why the studio is called “Liphart & Gerth” only became clear at the very end of the interview.
The Copper Mirror
The varied-toned sheen of “unsealed” copper, painterly streaks and fingerprints, exposed concrete, and the unusual proportions – when you study the ZILART Museum building by Sergei Tchoban and SPEECH architects, there is plenty to talk about. However, it seems to us that the most interesting thing is how the museum’s composition responds to the realities of the district itself. The residential district has been realized as an open-air exhibition of façade statements by contemporary architects – but without public access to the inner courtyards of the blocks. This building – that is, the museum – is exactly the opposite: on the outside, it is deliberately restrained, while inside it shines spectacularly, creating its own sunbeams in any weather.
“Strangers” in the City
We asked Alexander Skokan for a comment on the results of 2025 – and he sent us a whole article, moreover one devoted to the discussion we recently began on the “appropriateness of high-rises” – or, more broadly speaking, “contrasting insertions into the urban fabric”. The result is a text that is essentially a question: why here? Why like this?
Dmitry Ostroumov: “To use the language of alchemy, we are involved in the process of “transmutation...
What we ended up having was an extremely unusual conversation with Dmitry Ostroumov. Why? At the very least, because he is not just an architect specializing in the construction of Orthodox churches. And not just – which is an extreme rarity – a proponent of developing contemporary stylistics within this still highly conservative field. Dmitry Ostroumov is a Master of Theology. So in addition to the history and specifics of the company, we speak about the very concept of the temple, about canon and tradition, about the living and the eternal, and even about the Russian Logos.
A Glazed Figurine
In searching for an image for a residential building near the Novodevichy Convent, GAFA architects turned to their own perception of the place: it evoked associations with antiquity, plein-air painting, and vintage artifacts. The two towers will be entirely clad in volumetric glazed ceramic – at present, there are no other buildings like this in Russia. The complex will also stand out thanks to its metabolic bay-window cells, streamlined surfaces, a ceremonial “hotel-style” driveway, and a lobby overlooking a lush garden.
A Knight’s Move via the Cour d’Honneur
Intercolumnium Architects presented to the City Planning Council a residential complex project that is set to replace the Aquatoria business center on Vyborgskaya Embankment. Experts praised the overall quality of the work, but expressed reservations about the three cour d’honneurs and suggested softening the contrast between the facades facing the embankment and the Kantemirovsky Bridge.
Mountains, Groves, and Ancestral Towers
The year-round mountain resort Armkhi situated in Russia’s Republic of Ingushetia is positioned as a destination for calm family recreation and has well-established traditions shaped by its hundred-year history and the culture of the region. The development program prepared by the Genplan Institute of Moscow preserves the resort’s identity while expanding its offerings and introducing new types of tourist leisure. In the near future, the resort will feature a balneological center, a thermal complex, an interactive museum, an extreme park, and, of course, new ski slopes.
A Small Country
Mezonproekt is developing a long-term master plan for the MEPhI campus in Obninsk. Over the next ten years, an enclave territory of about 100 hectares, located in a forest on the northern edge of the city, is set to transform into a modern center for the development of the nuclear energy sector. The plan envisions attracting international students and specialists, as well as comprehensive territorial development: both through the contemporary realization of “frozen” plans from the 1980s and through the introduction of new trends – public spaces, an aquapark, a food court, a school, and even a nuclear medicine center. Public and sports facilities are intended to be accessible to city residents as well, and the campus is to be physically and functionally connected to Obninsk.
Pearl Divers
GAFA has designed an apartment complex for Derbent intended to switch people from a work mode to a resort mindset – and to give the surrounding area a much-needed jolt. The building offers two distinct faces: restrained and laconic on the city side, and a lushly ornate façade facing the sea. At the heart of the complex, a hidden pearl lies – an open-air pool with an arch, offering views of a starry sky, and providing direct access to the beach.