По-русски

​Evgeny Gerasimov: “Neoclassical architecture is like an aptitude test”

Evgeny Gerasimov meditates on the importance of the classical school, attention to detail, building materials, as well as speaks about budget planning, and about the marks that you cannot overstep if you are designing a neoclassical building.

23 March 2020
Interview
mainImg
Archi.ru:
Classical is a very broad notion indeed: there are several kinds of Renaissance architecture, Palladian style, classicism, Art Deco, Stalin architecture, postmodernism, and there are also our contemporaries who work in various versions of classical style. What does neoclassical architecture mean to you? What is your definition?

Evgeny Gerasimov:
Classical is basically the Ancient Greece and the Ancient Rome. Anything that is based on the architecture of orders to this or that extent can be considered as neoclassical architecture. Then there is also what we know as historicism – a broader notion that includes neoclassical architecture, the a-la Russ style, and the Antonio Rinaldi experiments with Chinese architecture. Neoclassical architecture is part of modern culture, there is a demand for it, and this is why we are discussing it right now. The traditional architecture is alive – the reports of its death are greatly exaggerated.

How compatible do you think are modern architecture techniques and seriously interpreted classical elements?

The relatively free variations of the elements of neoclassical architecture must be based on a sense of proportion and harmony; it is important not to overstep a certain mark. A lot of people do not even have a clue that the facades of the building on the Ostrovsky Square are ventilated, and the building itself is constructed of monolith reinforced concrete, with an underground parking garage and modern engineering solutions. Nevertheless, this building is neoclassical; one does not exclude the other.

  • zooming
    1 / 7
    Office building at the Ostrovsky Square, 2008
    Copyright: Evgeniy Gerasimov and Partners © photograph by Oleg Manov
  • zooming
    2 / 7
    Office building at the Ostrovsky Square, 2008
    Copyright: Evgeniy Gerasimov and Partners © photograph by Oleg Manov
  • zooming
    3 / 7
    Office building on the Ostrovsky Square, 2008
    Copyright: Evgeniy Gerasimov and Partners © photograph by Oleg Manov
  • zooming
    4 / 7
    Office building at the Ostrovsky Square, 2008
    Copyright: © Evgeniy Gerasimov and Partners
  • zooming
    5 / 7
    Office building at the Ostrovsky Square, 2008
    Copyright: © Evgeniy Gerasimov and Partners
  • zooming
    6 / 7
    Office building at the Ostrovsky Square, 2008
    Copyright: Evgeniy Gerasimov and Partners © photograph by Yuri Slavtsov
  • zooming
    7 / 7
    Office building on the Ostrovsky Square, 2008
    Copyright: Evgeniy Gerasimov and Partners © photograph by Oleg Manov


In what cases do you turn to neoclassical architecture? 

For us, this is just one of our branches – neither a priority nor a secondary one. We are well aware that there is a demand for it; in some certain places, the clients want to order specifically neoclassical things, and this coincides with our aspirations – we are interested in experimenting in this direction. This branch is just as good as any other. In the city center, of course, such projects appear more frequently. 

It is common knowledge that classical architecture is essentially a certain language that is capable of communicating rather complex and interesting messages. Could you please give examples of such messages in any of your projects – when you communicated a certain message with the language of classical architecture? 

To me, this statement sounds highly controversial. I am against “literature” in architecture – these are two different kinds of art. Architecture, after all, is a visual art; it is not text. All these discussions about “what did the architect want to say?” are evil. When you look at Rossi’s creations, nobody knows what he wanted to say. You see him route the Galernaya Street between the Senate and Synod buildings, and he does this with a stunning coup de maitre, through an arch. And, as for the Bolshaya Morskaya, he also brings it to the Palace Square with an arch. This is the ultimate architectural mastery; you really don’t have to look for some “hidden meaning” because it’s just not there. Architecture is all about organizing space, and he organized it with consummate skill. It has more craftwork than lyricisms about it.

When you do neoclassical architecture, it is crucially important to master the craftwork, the basics of the profession. You cannot overstep some certain borders set by the school. For example, when I see on the outer corner of the building rusticated stucco on the one side and polished granite on the other, that literally drives me nuts. This is carelessness, misunderstanding of form, and lack of knowledge of the very basics of the profession.

That is to say – if you want to build a good classic, it is enough to know everything about the antique architecture? 

No, not like that! You can be a great connoisseur but a musical critic is one thing, and a composer is another. Knowledge is a necessary, yet insufficient, condition for creating a decent project that you will not be ashamed to show to people. You also need to have skills, experience, and mastery, even if I sound overdramatic.

  • zooming
    1 / 11
    “Venice” housing complex, 2013
    Copyright: Evgeniy Gerasimov and Partners © Photograph by Aleksey Naroditskiy
  • zooming
    2 / 11
    “Venice” housing complex, 2013
    Copyright: Evgeniy Gerasimov and Partners © Photograph by Aleksey Naroditskiy
  • zooming
    3 / 11
    “Venice” housing complex, 2013
    Copyright: Evgeniy Gerasimov and Partners © Photograph by Yuri Slavtsov
  • zooming
    4 / 11
    “Venice” housing complex, 2013
    Copyright: Evgeniy Gerasimov and Partners © Photograph by Yuri Molodkovets
  • zooming
    5 / 11
    “Venice” housing complex, 2013
    Copyright: Evgeniy Gerasimov and Partners © Photograph by Yuri Slavtsov
  • zooming
    6 / 11
    “Venice” housing complex, 2013
    Copyright: Evgeniy Gerasimov and Partners © Photograph by Yuri Slavtsov
  • zooming
    7 / 11
    “Venice” housing complex, 2013
    Copyright: Evgeniy Gerasimov and Partners © Photograph by Yuri Slavtsov
  • zooming
    8 / 11
    “Venice” housing complex, 2013
    Copyright: Evgeniy Gerasimov and Partners © Photograph by Yuri Slavtsov
  • zooming
    9 / 11
    “Venice” housing complex, 2013
    Copyright: Evgeniy Gerasimov and Partners © Photograph by Yuri Slavtsov
  • zooming
    10 / 11
    “Venice” housing complex, 2013
    Copyright: Evgeniy Gerasimov and Partners © Photograph by Yuri Slavtsov
  • zooming
    11 / 11
    “Venice” housing complex, 2013
    Copyright: Evgeniy Gerasimov and Partners © Photograph by Yuri Slavtsov


Is building a neoclassical project always expensive?

Any building will be very expensive if you make everything from marble and gold. However, it can also be quite inexpensive, and there are lots of examples out there to prove that. In Rome, for example, everything is made of stone, and in Saint Petersburg, because money was always scarce, most of the classical buildings are actually stucco. However, at the same time, they never lost the culture of working with form – quite the opposite, it was honed because of the lack of resources.

Kvarnegi, for example, designed a few quite modest buildings. The Catherine Institute or the Mariinsky Hospital have long flat facades, yet at the same time these buildings sport a beautiful main portico that actually consumed a lion’s share of the budget. This is just like a broach, which, if selected with good taste, can lighten up a modest dress. The effect does not necessarily equal money.

  • zooming
    1 / 8
    “Verona” housing complex, 2018
    Copyright: Photograph © Andrey Belimov-Gushchin / Evgeniy Gerasimov and Partners
  • zooming
    2 / 8
    “Verona” housing complex, 2018
    Copyright: Photograph : Andrey Belimov-Gushchin © Evgeniy Gerasimov and Partners
  • zooming
    3 / 8
    “Verona” housing complex, 2018
    Copyright: Photograph © Andrey Belimov-Gushchin / Evgeniy Gerasimov and Partners
  • zooming
    4 / 8
    “Verona” housing complex, 2018
    Copyright: Photograph © Andrey Belimov-Gushchin / Evgeniy Gerasimov and Partners
  • zooming
    5 / 8
    “Verona” housing complex, 2018
    Copyright: Photograph © Andrey Belimov-Gushchin / Evgeniy Gerasimov and Partners
  • zooming
    6 / 8
    “Verona” housing complex, 2018
    Copyright: Photograph © Andrey Belimov-Gushchin / Evgeniy Gerasimov and Partners
  • zooming
    7 / 8
    “Verona” housing complex, 2018
    Copyright: Photograph © Andrey Belimov-Gushchin / Evgeniy Gerasimov and Partners
  • zooming
    8 / 8
    “Verona” housing complex, 2018
    Copyright: Photograph © Andrey Belimov-Gushchin / Evgeniy Gerasimov and Partners


Yes, but still, neoclassical architecture belongs in the high-end segment, doesn’t it?

Yes, it is, even though this could have been otherwise. The neoclassical architecture of the late 1950’s was done in rather simple forms. Let’s remember two houses designed by Sergey Speransky on the Moskovskaya Square, the ones that flank the Leninsky Avenue – they are very simple, decorated with tiles, with little accents. But they look beautiful even today! Why cannot mass housing look like that? A whole city block of such houses with an appropriate number of floors and appropriate proportions, somewhere on the Pulkovskoe Avenue – how cool would that be?

Adjusting neoclassical architecture to a 25-story-high housing complex is in fact quite possible. The architects of the Stalin epoch tackled that task with ease. The Soviet architects of the 1930’s-1950’s – the whole Zholtovsky galaxy — had such a great pre-revolution school, and were so professional that when in 1932 the communist government said “we are building this and this”, they were fully prepared for that. They did not have a shadow of a doubt what to do, and how. They achieved the ultimate mastery of taking the neoclassical architecture to any scale: stadiums, water dams, the VDNKh exhibition complex. Their sturdy background allowed them to easily respond to the social commission.

  • zooming
    1 / 11
    "Pobedy, 5" housing project, 2014
    Copyright: Evgeniy Gerasimov and Partners © Photograph by Yuri Slavtsov
  • zooming
    2 / 11
    "Pobedy, 5" housing project, 2014
    Copyright: © Evgeniy Gerasimov and Partners
  • zooming
    3 / 11
    "Pobedy, 5" housing project, 2014
    Copyright: Evgeniy Gerasimov and Partners
  • zooming
    4 / 11
    "Pobedy, 5" housing project, 2014
    Copyright: Evgeniy Gerasimov and Partners
  • zooming
    5 / 11
    "Pobedy, 5" housing project, 2014
    Copyright: Evgeniy Gerasimov and Partners
  • zooming
    6 / 11
    "Pobedy, 5" housing project, 2014
    Copyright: Evgeniy Gerasimov and Partners
  • zooming
    7 / 11
    "Pobedy, 5" housing project, 2014
    Copyright: Evgeniy Gerasimov and Partners
  • zooming
    8 / 11
    "Pobedy, 5" housing project, 2014
    Copyright: Evgeniy Gerasimov and Partners
  • zooming
    9 / 11
    "Pobedy, 5" housing project, 2014
    Copyright: Evgeniy Gerasimov and Partners
  • zooming
    10 / 11
    "Pobedy, 5" housing project, 2014
    Copyright: Evgeniy Gerasimov and Partners
  • zooming
    11 / 11
    "Pobedy, 5" housing project, 2014
    Copyright: Evgeniy Gerasimov and Partners


Meaning, it’s not the budget that matters, but the architect’s mastery and quality of execution?

Neoclassical architecture does not like things that are incomplete or left to chance. Other kinds of architecture sometimes do allow of such things – take Frank Gehry as an example. If we are to look carefully at the Guggenheim Museum in Bilbao, we will see that the facade subsystems are misaligned, the construction quality is appalling, and the guiding rails stick out from underneath the tiles – they miscalculated it. In that project, however, it is quite acceptable, and is perceived as homage to deconstructivism. Neoclassical architecture allows of no such things, it just cannot be incomplete.

Another important point is that the client may not be aware of the costs of the project, but the architect has to be. You must be able to match your ideas with your capabilities, in order to make sure very early on that you don’t mess it up and don’t draw something that just cannot be built with the budget that you have. Cut your coating according to your cloth. And this is also part of your professionalism. Just like in any other business: a chef must know what ingredients in what price bracket he must purchase so as to meet the customer’s expectations. Otherwise, it’s going to look very funny, like a person walking around with a Ferragamo briefcase, but barefoot. Hence the banisters made from angle bars, or the building gets damp and starts falling apart after the first winter.

Neoclassical architecture is like an aptitude test. It’s a challenge that few can cope with. It’s one thing making renders on your computer – it’s quite easy, the possibilities of the modern 3D design software are virtually endless. However, the proof of pudding is in the eating, as the founders of Marxism-Leninism taught us.

Probably because of that neoclassical architecture is not mainstream. Mainstream, on the other hand, is either hyper-modernism or jokes in the spirit of MVRDV.

  • zooming
    1 / 9
    High-end residential complex Art View House on the Moika Embankment, 102, 2019
    Photograph © Andrey Belimov-Gushchin / Evgeniy Gerasimov & partners
  • zooming
    2 / 9
    High-end residential complex Art View House on the Moika Embankment, 102, 2019
    Photograph © Andrey Belimov-Gushchin / Evgeniy Gerasimov & partners
  • zooming
    3 / 9
    High-end residential complex Art View House on the Moika Embankment, 102, 2019
    Copyright: Photograph © Andrey Belimov-Gushchin / Evgeniy Gerasimov and Partners
  • zooming
    4 / 9
    High-end residential complex Art View House on the Moika Embankment, 102, 2019
    Copyright: Photograph © Ilia Priporov / Evgeniy Gerasimov and Partners
  • zooming
    5 / 9
    Art View House on the Moika Waterfront
    Photograph © Andrey Belimov-Gushchin / Evgeniy Gerasimov & partners
  • zooming
    6 / 9
    High-end residential complex Art View House on the Moika Embankment, 102, 2019
    Copyright: Photograph © Andrey Belimov-Gushchin / Evgeniy Gerasimov and Partners
  • zooming
    7 / 9
    High-end residential complex Art View House on the Moika Embankment, 102, 2019
    Copyright: Photograph © Andrey Belimov-Gushchin / Evgeniy Gerasimov and Partners
  • zooming
    8 / 9
    High-end residential complex Art View House on the Moika Embankment, 102, 2019
    Photograph © Andrey Belimov-Gushchin / Evgeniy Gerasimov & partners
  • zooming
    9 / 9
    High-end residential complex Art View House on the Moika Embankment, 102, 2019
    Photograph © Andrey Belimov-Gushchin / Evgeniy Gerasimov & partners


Does it make sense to speak about evolution of this style in your company’s projects? Getting more sophisticated, perhaps?

In terms of pure drawing, probably no! Compared to the centuries of neoclassical architecture, twenty five years are but a fleeting moment. Rather, we have been evolving in terms of technology, which never stops developing. Executing such sophisticated components of the building as on Moika 102 was unthinkable a few years ago. This expands the architect’s capabilities; you can include into your projects more elements that are made at a factory, and not by the stucco artist. Seriously, this is very cool that a perfect Ionic column cap can be easily made with a machine, and then just mounted on the construction site, like in an erector set.

So it means that “neoclassical is in the details”?

Yes, pretty much so. An architect’s task is not fulfilled if you don’t feel like coming up close and touching the building. And I don’t feel like coming up close if I can see what it is all about from a hundred meters away: I get the idea, thank you, that’s enough. And sometimes you do feel like coming up close and checking out just how exactly it was done. All David Chipperfield buildings are like that. They are seemingly simple – but you at once get a lot of questions: how did the cast the concrete, how one matches the other, how was the window fitted into the concrete cast, how was the molding made? Amazing! Adam Caruso and Peter St John are also great masters of detail. Their bank in Bremen, Germany, is absolutely superb.

Details are particularly important where they can be closely examined – that is, on the bottom floors. You can simplify as you go higher, but you also have to do that smart. If we are to examine the sculptures of the Admiralty from a close range, it may seem that they all have dropsy. However, my architectural experience tells me that the author new how they would be perceived from a distance, in the air perspective. A person must want to come closer to the building and touch it. And we are trying to achieve such tactile attractiveness in each of our projects. So that are building would be interesting to look at from two, twenty, and two hundred meters away.

23 March 2020

Headlines now
Living in the Architecture of One’s Own Making
Do architects design houses for themselves? You bet! In this article, we are examining a new book by TATLIN publishing house. This book – unprecedented for Russia – features 52 private homes designed and built by contemporary architects for themselves. It includes houses that are famous, even iconic, as well as lesser-known ones; large and small, stylish and eccentric. To some extent, the book reflects the history of Russian architecture over the past 30 years.
A City Block Isoline
Another competition project for a residential complex on the banks of the Volga in Nizhny Novgorod has been prepared by Studio 44. A team of architects led by Ivan Kozhin concluded that using a regular block layout in such a location would be inappropriate and developed a “custom design” approach: a chain of parceled multi-section buildings stretching along the entire embankment. Let’s explore the features and advantages of this unconventional method.
Competition: The Price of Creativity?
Any day now, we’re expecting the results of a competition held by the “Samolet” development group for a plot in Kommunarka. In the meantime, we share the impressions of Editor-in-Chief Julia Tarabarina, who managed to conduct a public talk. Though technically focused on the interaction between developers and architects, the public talk turned into a discussion about the pros and cons of architectural competitions.
Terraced Design
The “River Park” residential complex has confidently and securely shaped the Nagatinsky Backwater shoreline. Featuring a public embankment, elevated courtyards connected by pedestrian bridges, and brick façades, the development invites exploration of its nuanced response to the surrounding context, as well as hints of the architects’ megalithic design thinking.
A Kremlin’s Core and Meteorite Fragments
We continue our coverage of the competition projects for the residential district that the development company GloraX plans to build along the embankment of the Rowing Channel in Nizhny Novgorod. ASADOV Architects approached the concept through a deep dive into local identity, using storytelling to pinpoint a central idea for the design: the master plan and composition are imagined as if a meteorite had struck a “proto-Kremlin”. Sounds weird? Find more details below!
The Volga Regatta
GloraX plans to develop a residential complex spanning 14 hectares along the Volga River in Nizhny Novgorod. The winning design in a closed-door competition, created by GORA Architects, features housing typologies ranging from townhouses to terraced high-rise slabs, a balance of functions, diverse ways of engaging with the water, and even a dedicated island (no less!) for the city residents.
A New Track
We took a thorough look at D_Station, a railcar repair depot dating back to 1906, recently reconstructed while preserving its century-old industrial structure, upon the project by Sergey Trukhanov and T+T Architects. Though work on the interiors – set to house restaurants and public spaces – is still underway, the building’s exterior already offers plenty to see. Visitors can explore the blend of old and new brickwork, appreciate the architect’s unique interpretation of ruin aesthetics, and enjoy the newly built pedestrian route that connects the Citydel Business Center’s arches to Kazakova Street.
Four Different Surveys
The “Explore the City” competition, organized this year by the Genplan Institute of Moscow, stands out as a pretty unconventional one for the architectural field but aligns perfectly well with the character of urban planning work. The winning project analyzed contemporary residential complexes, combining urban planning insights with a realtor’s perspective to propose a hybrid approach. Other entries explored public centers, motivations for car ownership, and housing vacancy rates. A fifth participant withdrew. Here’s a closer look at the four completed works.
Scheduled Evolution
ASADOV Architects unveiled the EvyCenter pavilion, a microcultural hub for fostering personal growth, organizing workshops, and doing gymnastics. Additionally, this pavilion serves as a prototype for a scalable country house, drawing inspiration from the “Loskutok” project, and constructed from CLT panels in a factory. This marks the beginning of a developer project initiated by the architectural firm (sic!), which is seeking partners to expand both small Evy settlements and even larger Evy cities, which are, according to Andrey Asadov, aimed at fostering the “evolutionary” development of the people who will inhabit them.
The Golden Crown
The concept for a dental clinic in Yekaterinburg, developed by CNTR Studio, revolves around the idea of a “mouth full of gold”: pristine white porcelain stoneware walls are complemented by matte brass details. To avoid an overly literal interpretation, the architects focused on the building’s proportions, skillfully navigating between sunlight requirements and fire safety regulations.
Flexibility and Integration
Not long ago, we covered the project for the fourth phase of the ÁLIA residential complex, designed by APEX. Now, we’ve been shown different fence concepts they developed to enclose the complex’s private courtyards, incorporating a variety of public functions. We believe that the sheer fact that the complex’s architects were involved in such a detail as fencing speaks volumes.
A Step Forward
The HIDE residential complex represents a major milestone for ADM architects and their leaders Andrey Romanov and Ekaterina Kuznetsova in their quest for a fresh high-rise aesthetic – one that is flexible and layered, capable of bringing vibrancy to mass and silhouette while shaping form. Over recent years, this approach has become ADM’s “signature style”, with the golden HIDE tower playing a pivotal role in its evolution. Here, we delve into the project’s story, explore the details of the complex’s design, and uncover its core essence.
Gold in the Sands
A new office for a transcontinental company specializing in resource extraction and processing has opened in Dubai. Designed by T+T Architects, masters of creating spaces that are contemporary, diverse, flexible, and original, this project exemplifies their expertise. On the executive floor, a massive brass-clad partition dominates, while layered textures of compressed earth create a contextually resonant backdrop.
Layers and Levels of Flight
This project goes way back – Reserve Union won this architectural competition at the end of 2011, and the building was completed in 2018, so it’s practically “archival”. However, despite being relatively unknown, the building can hardly be considered “dated” and remains a prime example of architectural expression, particularly in the headquarters genre. And it’s especially fitting for an aviation company office. In some ways, it resembles the Aeroflot headquarters at Sheremetyevo but with its own unique identity, following the signature style of Vladimir Plotkin. In this article, we take an in-depth look at the United Aircraft Corporation (UAC) headquarters in the Moscow agglomeration town of Zhukovsky, supplemented by recent photographs from Alexey Naroditsky – a shoot that became only recently possible due to the fact that improvements were finally made in the surrounding area.
Light and Shadow
In this article, we delve into the architectural design of the “Chaika” house by DNK ag architects, which was recently completed in 2023 as part of the collection of signature designs at ZILArt. As is well-known, all the buildings in this complex follow a design code, yet each one is distinct. This particular building stands out not only for its whiteness and minimalism but also for the refined use of a limited number of techniques that, together, create what can confidently be called synergy.
Casus Novae
A master plan was developed for a large residential area with a name of “DNS City”, but now that its implementation began, the plan has been arbitrarily reformatted and replaced with something that, while similar on the surface, is actually quite different. This is not the first time such a thing happens, but it’s always frustrating. With permission from the author, we are sharing Maria Elkina’s post.
Treasure Hunting
The GAFA bureau, in collaboration with Tegola and Arkhitail, organized an expedition to the island of Kilpola in Karelia as part of Moskomarkhitektura’s “Open City” festival. There, amidst moss and rocks, the students sought answers to questions like: what is the sacred, where does it dwell, and what sustains it? Assisting the participants in this quest were landscape engineer Evgeny Levin, artist Nicholas Roerich, a moose, and the lack of cellular connection. Here’s how the story unfolded.
Depths of the Earth, Streams of Water
In the Malaya Okhta district, the Akzent building, designed by Stepan Liphart, was constructed. It follows a classic tripartite structure, yet it’s what you might call “hand-drawn”: each façade is unique in its form and details, some of which aren’t immediately noticeable. In this article, we explore the context and, together with the architect, delve into how the form was developed.
Fir Tree Dynamics
The “Airports of Region” holding is planning to build an airport in Karachay-Cherkessia, aiming to make the Arkhyz and Dombay resorts more accessible to travelers. The project that won in an invitation-only competition, submitted by Sergey Nikeshkin’s KPLN, blends natural imagery inspired by the shape of a conifer seed, open-air waiting spaces, majestic large trees, and a green roof elevated on needle-like columns. The result is both nature-inspired and WOW.
​A Brick Shell
In the process of designing a clubhouse situated among pine trees in a prestigious suburban area near Moscow, the architectural firm “A.Len” did the façade design part. The combination of different types of brick and masonry correlates with the volumetric and plastique solutions, further enhanced by the inclusion of wood-painted fragments and metal “glazing”.
Word Forms
ATRIUM architects love ambitious challenges, and for the firm’s thirtieth anniversary, they boldly play a game of words with an exhibition that dives deep into a self-created vocabulary. They immerse their projects – especially art installations – into this glossary, as if plunging into a current of their own. You feel as if you’re flowing through the veins of pure art, immersed in a universe of vertical cities, educational spaces – of which the architects are true masters – and the cultural codes of various locations. But what truly captivates is the bold statement that Vera Butko and Anton Nadtochy make, both through their work and this exhibition: architecture, above all, is art – the art of working with form and space.
Flexibility and Acuteness of Modernity
Luxurious, fluid, large “kokoshniks” and spiral barrel columns, as if made from colorful chewing gum: there seem to be no other mansion like this in Moscow, designed in the “Neo-Russian-Modern” style. And the “Teremok” on Malaya Kaluzhskaya, previously somewhat obscure, has “come alive with new colors” and gained visibility after its restoration for the office of the “architectural ecosystem” as the architects love to call themselves. It’s evident that Julius Borisov and the architects at UNK put their hearts into finding this new office and bringing it up to date. Let’s delve into the paradoxes of this mansion’s history and its plasticity. Spoiler: two versions of modernity meet here, both balancing on the razor’s edge of “what’s current”.
Yuri Vissarionov: “A modular house does not belong to the land”
It belongs to space, or to the air... It turns out that 3D printing is more effective when combined with a modular approach: the house is built in a workshop and then adapted to the site, including on uneven terrain. Yuri Vissarionov shares his latest experience in designing tourist complexes, both in central Russia and in the south. These include houseboats, homes printed from lightweight concrete using a 3D printer, and, of course, frame houses.
​Moscow’s First
“The quality of education largely depends on the quality of the educational environment”. This principle of the last decade has been realized by Sergey Skuratov in the project for the First Moscow Gymnasium on Rostovskaya Embankment in the Khamovniki district. The building seamlessly integrates into the complex urban landscape, responding both to the pedestrian flow of the city and the quiet alleyways. It skillfully takes advantage of the height differences and aligns with modern trends in educational space design. Let’s take a closer look.
Looking at the Water
The site of Villa Sonata stretches from the road to the water’s edge, offering its own shoreline, pier, and a picturesque river panorama. To reveal these sweeping views, Roman Leonidov “cut” the façade diagonally parallel to the river, thus getting two main axes for the house and, consequently, “two heads”. The internal core – two double-height spaces, a living room and a conservatory, with a “bridge” above them – makes the house both “transparent” and filled with light.
The White Wing
Well, it’s not exactly white. It’s more of a beige, white-stone structure that plays with the color of limestone – smoother surfaces are lighter, while rougher ones are darker. This wing unites various elements: it absorbs and interprets the surrounding themes. It responds to everything, yet maintains a cohesive expression – a challenging task! – while also incorporating recognizable features of its own, such as the dynamic cuts at the bottom, top, and middle.
Urban Dunes
The XSA Ramps team designed and built a three-part sports hub for a park in Rostov-on-Don, welcoming people of all ages and fitness levels. The skate plaza, pump track, and playground are all meticulously crafted with details that attract a diverse range of visitors. The technical execution of the shapes and slopes transforms this space into a kind of sculptural composition.
Proportional Growth
The project for the fourth phase of the ÁLIA residential area has been announced. The buildings are situated on an elongated plot – almost a “ray” that shoots out from the center of the area towards the river. Their layout reflects both a response to Moscow’s architectural preferences over the past 15 years, shifting “from blocks to towers”, and an interpretation of the neighboring business park designed by SOM. Additionally, the best apartments here are not located at the very top but closer to the middle, forming a glowing “waistline”.
The “Staircase” Building
In designing the “Details” residential complex in New Moscow, Rais Baishev spiced up the now-popular Moscow theme of a “courtyard” building with an idea drawn from the surrealist drawings by Maurits Escher. He envisioned the stepped silhouettes and descending slopes as a metaphysical mega-staircase, creating a key void within the courtyard that gave the project an internal “spine”. This concept is felt both in the building’s silhouette and on its façades.
Projection of the Quarter
No one doubted that the building that Vladimir Plotkin designed as part of the “Garden Quarters” would be the most modernist of all. And it turned out just that way: while adhering to the common design code, the building successfully combines brick and white stone, rhythmically responding to the neighboring building designed by Ostozhenka, yet tactfully and persistently making a few statements of its own. This includes the projection of the ideal urban development composition “14–9–6”, which can be found right next door, mathematical calculations, including those for various types of terraces (and perhaps the only reminder of the Soviet past of the Kauchuk rubber factory!), and the white “cross-stitch” pattern of the façade grid.