По-русски

​Evgeny Gerasimov: “Neoclassical architecture is like an aptitude test”

Evgeny Gerasimov meditates on the importance of the classical school, attention to detail, building materials, as well as speaks about budget planning, and about the marks that you cannot overstep if you are designing a neoclassical building.

23 March 2020
Interview
mainImg
Archi.ru:
Classical is a very broad notion indeed: there are several kinds of Renaissance architecture, Palladian style, classicism, Art Deco, Stalin architecture, postmodernism, and there are also our contemporaries who work in various versions of classical style. What does neoclassical architecture mean to you? What is your definition?

Evgeny Gerasimov:
Classical is basically the Ancient Greece and the Ancient Rome. Anything that is based on the architecture of orders to this or that extent can be considered as neoclassical architecture. Then there is also what we know as historicism – a broader notion that includes neoclassical architecture, the a-la Russ style, and the Antonio Rinaldi experiments with Chinese architecture. Neoclassical architecture is part of modern culture, there is a demand for it, and this is why we are discussing it right now. The traditional architecture is alive – the reports of its death are greatly exaggerated.

How compatible do you think are modern architecture techniques and seriously interpreted classical elements?

The relatively free variations of the elements of neoclassical architecture must be based on a sense of proportion and harmony; it is important not to overstep a certain mark. A lot of people do not even have a clue that the facades of the building on the Ostrovsky Square are ventilated, and the building itself is constructed of monolith reinforced concrete, with an underground parking garage and modern engineering solutions. Nevertheless, this building is neoclassical; one does not exclude the other.

  • zooming
    1 / 7
    Office building at the Ostrovsky Square, 2008
    Copyright: Evgeniy Gerasimov and Partners © photograph by Oleg Manov
  • zooming
    2 / 7
    Office building at the Ostrovsky Square, 2008
    Copyright: Evgeniy Gerasimov and Partners © photograph by Oleg Manov
  • zooming
    3 / 7
    Office building on the Ostrovsky Square, 2008
    Copyright: Evgeniy Gerasimov and Partners © photograph by Oleg Manov
  • zooming
    4 / 7
    Office building at the Ostrovsky Square, 2008
    Copyright: © Evgeniy Gerasimov and Partners
  • zooming
    5 / 7
    Office building at the Ostrovsky Square, 2008
    Copyright: © Evgeniy Gerasimov and Partners
  • zooming
    6 / 7
    Office building at the Ostrovsky Square, 2008
    Copyright: Evgeniy Gerasimov and Partners © photograph by Yuri Slavtsov
  • zooming
    7 / 7
    Office building on the Ostrovsky Square, 2008
    Copyright: Evgeniy Gerasimov and Partners © photograph by Oleg Manov


In what cases do you turn to neoclassical architecture? 

For us, this is just one of our branches – neither a priority nor a secondary one. We are well aware that there is a demand for it; in some certain places, the clients want to order specifically neoclassical things, and this coincides with our aspirations – we are interested in experimenting in this direction. This branch is just as good as any other. In the city center, of course, such projects appear more frequently. 

It is common knowledge that classical architecture is essentially a certain language that is capable of communicating rather complex and interesting messages. Could you please give examples of such messages in any of your projects – when you communicated a certain message with the language of classical architecture? 

To me, this statement sounds highly controversial. I am against “literature” in architecture – these are two different kinds of art. Architecture, after all, is a visual art; it is not text. All these discussions about “what did the architect want to say?” are evil. When you look at Rossi’s creations, nobody knows what he wanted to say. You see him route the Galernaya Street between the Senate and Synod buildings, and he does this with a stunning coup de maitre, through an arch. And, as for the Bolshaya Morskaya, he also brings it to the Palace Square with an arch. This is the ultimate architectural mastery; you really don’t have to look for some “hidden meaning” because it’s just not there. Architecture is all about organizing space, and he organized it with consummate skill. It has more craftwork than lyricisms about it.

When you do neoclassical architecture, it is crucially important to master the craftwork, the basics of the profession. You cannot overstep some certain borders set by the school. For example, when I see on the outer corner of the building rusticated stucco on the one side and polished granite on the other, that literally drives me nuts. This is carelessness, misunderstanding of form, and lack of knowledge of the very basics of the profession.

That is to say – if you want to build a good classic, it is enough to know everything about the antique architecture? 

No, not like that! You can be a great connoisseur but a musical critic is one thing, and a composer is another. Knowledge is a necessary, yet insufficient, condition for creating a decent project that you will not be ashamed to show to people. You also need to have skills, experience, and mastery, even if I sound overdramatic.

  • zooming
    1 / 11
    “Venice” housing complex, 2013
    Copyright: Evgeniy Gerasimov and Partners © Photograph by Aleksey Naroditskiy
  • zooming
    2 / 11
    “Venice” housing complex, 2013
    Copyright: Evgeniy Gerasimov and Partners © Photograph by Aleksey Naroditskiy
  • zooming
    3 / 11
    “Venice” housing complex, 2013
    Copyright: Evgeniy Gerasimov and Partners © Photograph by Yuri Slavtsov
  • zooming
    4 / 11
    “Venice” housing complex, 2013
    Copyright: Evgeniy Gerasimov and Partners © Photograph by Yuri Molodkovets
  • zooming
    5 / 11
    “Venice” housing complex, 2013
    Copyright: Evgeniy Gerasimov and Partners © Photograph by Yuri Slavtsov
  • zooming
    6 / 11
    “Venice” housing complex, 2013
    Copyright: Evgeniy Gerasimov and Partners © Photograph by Yuri Slavtsov
  • zooming
    7 / 11
    “Venice” housing complex, 2013
    Copyright: Evgeniy Gerasimov and Partners © Photograph by Yuri Slavtsov
  • zooming
    8 / 11
    “Venice” housing complex, 2013
    Copyright: Evgeniy Gerasimov and Partners © Photograph by Yuri Slavtsov
  • zooming
    9 / 11
    “Venice” housing complex, 2013
    Copyright: Evgeniy Gerasimov and Partners © Photograph by Yuri Slavtsov
  • zooming
    10 / 11
    “Venice” housing complex, 2013
    Copyright: Evgeniy Gerasimov and Partners © Photograph by Yuri Slavtsov
  • zooming
    11 / 11
    “Venice” housing complex, 2013
    Copyright: Evgeniy Gerasimov and Partners © Photograph by Yuri Slavtsov


Is building a neoclassical project always expensive?

Any building will be very expensive if you make everything from marble and gold. However, it can also be quite inexpensive, and there are lots of examples out there to prove that. In Rome, for example, everything is made of stone, and in Saint Petersburg, because money was always scarce, most of the classical buildings are actually stucco. However, at the same time, they never lost the culture of working with form – quite the opposite, it was honed because of the lack of resources.

Kvarnegi, for example, designed a few quite modest buildings. The Catherine Institute or the Mariinsky Hospital have long flat facades, yet at the same time these buildings sport a beautiful main portico that actually consumed a lion’s share of the budget. This is just like a broach, which, if selected with good taste, can lighten up a modest dress. The effect does not necessarily equal money.

  • zooming
    1 / 8
    “Verona” housing complex, 2018
    Copyright: Photograph © Andrey Belimov-Gushchin / Evgeniy Gerasimov and Partners
  • zooming
    2 / 8
    “Verona” housing complex, 2018
    Copyright: Photograph : Andrey Belimov-Gushchin © Evgeniy Gerasimov and Partners
  • zooming
    3 / 8
    “Verona” housing complex, 2018
    Copyright: Photograph © Andrey Belimov-Gushchin / Evgeniy Gerasimov and Partners
  • zooming
    4 / 8
    “Verona” housing complex, 2018
    Copyright: Photograph © Andrey Belimov-Gushchin / Evgeniy Gerasimov and Partners
  • zooming
    5 / 8
    “Verona” housing complex, 2018
    Copyright: Photograph © Andrey Belimov-Gushchin / Evgeniy Gerasimov and Partners
  • zooming
    6 / 8
    “Verona” housing complex, 2018
    Copyright: Photograph © Andrey Belimov-Gushchin / Evgeniy Gerasimov and Partners
  • zooming
    7 / 8
    “Verona” housing complex, 2018
    Copyright: Photograph © Andrey Belimov-Gushchin / Evgeniy Gerasimov and Partners
  • zooming
    8 / 8
    “Verona” housing complex, 2018
    Copyright: Photograph © Andrey Belimov-Gushchin / Evgeniy Gerasimov and Partners


Yes, but still, neoclassical architecture belongs in the high-end segment, doesn’t it?

Yes, it is, even though this could have been otherwise. The neoclassical architecture of the late 1950’s was done in rather simple forms. Let’s remember two houses designed by Sergey Speransky on the Moskovskaya Square, the ones that flank the Leninsky Avenue – they are very simple, decorated with tiles, with little accents. But they look beautiful even today! Why cannot mass housing look like that? A whole city block of such houses with an appropriate number of floors and appropriate proportions, somewhere on the Pulkovskoe Avenue – how cool would that be?

Adjusting neoclassical architecture to a 25-story-high housing complex is in fact quite possible. The architects of the Stalin epoch tackled that task with ease. The Soviet architects of the 1930’s-1950’s – the whole Zholtovsky galaxy — had such a great pre-revolution school, and were so professional that when in 1932 the communist government said “we are building this and this”, they were fully prepared for that. They did not have a shadow of a doubt what to do, and how. They achieved the ultimate mastery of taking the neoclassical architecture to any scale: stadiums, water dams, the VDNKh exhibition complex. Their sturdy background allowed them to easily respond to the social commission.

  • zooming
    1 / 11
    "Pobedy, 5" housing project, 2014
    Copyright: Evgeniy Gerasimov and Partners © Photograph by Yuri Slavtsov
  • zooming
    2 / 11
    "Pobedy, 5" housing project, 2014
    Copyright: © Evgeniy Gerasimov and Partners
  • zooming
    3 / 11
    "Pobedy, 5" housing project, 2014
    Copyright: Evgeniy Gerasimov and Partners
  • zooming
    4 / 11
    "Pobedy, 5" housing project, 2014
    Copyright: Evgeniy Gerasimov and Partners
  • zooming
    5 / 11
    "Pobedy, 5" housing project, 2014
    Copyright: Evgeniy Gerasimov and Partners
  • zooming
    6 / 11
    "Pobedy, 5" housing project, 2014
    Copyright: Evgeniy Gerasimov and Partners
  • zooming
    7 / 11
    "Pobedy, 5" housing project, 2014
    Copyright: Evgeniy Gerasimov and Partners
  • zooming
    8 / 11
    "Pobedy, 5" housing project, 2014
    Copyright: Evgeniy Gerasimov and Partners
  • zooming
    9 / 11
    "Pobedy, 5" housing project, 2014
    Copyright: Evgeniy Gerasimov and Partners
  • zooming
    10 / 11
    "Pobedy, 5" housing project, 2014
    Copyright: Evgeniy Gerasimov and Partners
  • zooming
    11 / 11
    "Pobedy, 5" housing project, 2014
    Copyright: Evgeniy Gerasimov and Partners


Meaning, it’s not the budget that matters, but the architect’s mastery and quality of execution?

Neoclassical architecture does not like things that are incomplete or left to chance. Other kinds of architecture sometimes do allow of such things – take Frank Gehry as an example. If we are to look carefully at the Guggenheim Museum in Bilbao, we will see that the facade subsystems are misaligned, the construction quality is appalling, and the guiding rails stick out from underneath the tiles – they miscalculated it. In that project, however, it is quite acceptable, and is perceived as homage to deconstructivism. Neoclassical architecture allows of no such things, it just cannot be incomplete.

Another important point is that the client may not be aware of the costs of the project, but the architect has to be. You must be able to match your ideas with your capabilities, in order to make sure very early on that you don’t mess it up and don’t draw something that just cannot be built with the budget that you have. Cut your coating according to your cloth. And this is also part of your professionalism. Just like in any other business: a chef must know what ingredients in what price bracket he must purchase so as to meet the customer’s expectations. Otherwise, it’s going to look very funny, like a person walking around with a Ferragamo briefcase, but barefoot. Hence the banisters made from angle bars, or the building gets damp and starts falling apart after the first winter.

Neoclassical architecture is like an aptitude test. It’s a challenge that few can cope with. It’s one thing making renders on your computer – it’s quite easy, the possibilities of the modern 3D design software are virtually endless. However, the proof of pudding is in the eating, as the founders of Marxism-Leninism taught us.

Probably because of that neoclassical architecture is not mainstream. Mainstream, on the other hand, is either hyper-modernism or jokes in the spirit of MVRDV.

  • zooming
    1 / 9
    High-end residential complex Art View House on the Moika Embankment, 102, 2019
    Photograph © Andrey Belimov-Gushchin / Evgeniy Gerasimov & partners
  • zooming
    2 / 9
    High-end residential complex Art View House on the Moika Embankment, 102, 2019
    Photograph © Andrey Belimov-Gushchin / Evgeniy Gerasimov & partners
  • zooming
    3 / 9
    High-end residential complex Art View House on the Moika Embankment, 102, 2019
    Copyright: Photograph © Andrey Belimov-Gushchin / Evgeniy Gerasimov and Partners
  • zooming
    4 / 9
    High-end residential complex Art View House on the Moika Embankment, 102, 2019
    Copyright: Photograph © Ilia Priporov / Evgeniy Gerasimov and Partners
  • zooming
    5 / 9
    Art View House on the Moika Waterfront
    Photograph © Andrey Belimov-Gushchin / Evgeniy Gerasimov & partners
  • zooming
    6 / 9
    High-end residential complex Art View House on the Moika Embankment, 102, 2019
    Copyright: Photograph © Andrey Belimov-Gushchin / Evgeniy Gerasimov and Partners
  • zooming
    7 / 9
    High-end residential complex Art View House on the Moika Embankment, 102, 2019
    Copyright: Photograph © Andrey Belimov-Gushchin / Evgeniy Gerasimov and Partners
  • zooming
    8 / 9
    High-end residential complex Art View House on the Moika Embankment, 102, 2019
    Photograph © Andrey Belimov-Gushchin / Evgeniy Gerasimov & partners
  • zooming
    9 / 9
    High-end residential complex Art View House on the Moika Embankment, 102, 2019
    Photograph © Andrey Belimov-Gushchin / Evgeniy Gerasimov & partners


Does it make sense to speak about evolution of this style in your company’s projects? Getting more sophisticated, perhaps?

In terms of pure drawing, probably no! Compared to the centuries of neoclassical architecture, twenty five years are but a fleeting moment. Rather, we have been evolving in terms of technology, which never stops developing. Executing such sophisticated components of the building as on Moika 102 was unthinkable a few years ago. This expands the architect’s capabilities; you can include into your projects more elements that are made at a factory, and not by the stucco artist. Seriously, this is very cool that a perfect Ionic column cap can be easily made with a machine, and then just mounted on the construction site, like in an erector set.

So it means that “neoclassical is in the details”?

Yes, pretty much so. An architect’s task is not fulfilled if you don’t feel like coming up close and touching the building. And I don’t feel like coming up close if I can see what it is all about from a hundred meters away: I get the idea, thank you, that’s enough. And sometimes you do feel like coming up close and checking out just how exactly it was done. All David Chipperfield buildings are like that. They are seemingly simple – but you at once get a lot of questions: how did the cast the concrete, how one matches the other, how was the window fitted into the concrete cast, how was the molding made? Amazing! Adam Caruso and Peter St John are also great masters of detail. Their bank in Bremen, Germany, is absolutely superb.

Details are particularly important where they can be closely examined – that is, on the bottom floors. You can simplify as you go higher, but you also have to do that smart. If we are to examine the sculptures of the Admiralty from a close range, it may seem that they all have dropsy. However, my architectural experience tells me that the author new how they would be perceived from a distance, in the air perspective. A person must want to come closer to the building and touch it. And we are trying to achieve such tactile attractiveness in each of our projects. So that are building would be interesting to look at from two, twenty, and two hundred meters away.

23 March 2020

Headlines now
The Big Twelve
Yesterday, the winners of the Moscow Mayor’s Architecture Award were announced and honored. Let’s take a look at what was awarded and, in some cases, even critique this esteemed award. After all, there is always room for improvement, right?
Above the Golden Horn
The residential complex “Philosophy” designed by T+T architects in Vladivostok, is one of the new projects in the “Golubinaya Pad” area, changing its development philosophy (pun intended) from single houses to a comprehensive approach. The buildings are organized along public streets, varying in height and format, with one house even executed in gallery typology, featuring a cantilever leaning on an art object.
Nuanced Alternative
How can you rhyme a square and space? Easily! But to do so, you need to rhyme everything you can possibly think of: weave everything together, like in a tensegrity structure, and find your own optics too. The new exhibition at GES-2 does just that, offering its visitor a new perspective on the history of art spanning 150 years, infused with the hope for endless multiplicity of worlds and art histories. Read on to see how this is achieved and how the exhibition design by Evgeny Ace contributes to it.
Blinds for Ice
An ice arena has been constructed in Domodedovo based on a project by Yuri Vissarionov Architects. To prevent the long façade, a technical requirement for winter sports facilities, from appearing monotonous, the architects proposed the use of suspended structures with multidirectional slats. This design protects the ice from direct sunlight while giving the wall texture and detail.
Campus within a Day
In this article, we talk about what the participants of Genplan Institute of Moscow’s hackathon were doing at the MosComArchitecture booth at the “ArchMoscow” exhibition. We also discuss who won the prize and why, and what can be done with the territory of a small university on the outskirts of Moscow.
Vertical Civilization
Genpro considered the development of the vertical city concept and made it the theme of their pavilion at the “ArchMoscow” exhibition.
Marina Yegorova: “We think in terms of hectares, not square meters”
The career path of architect Marina Yegorova is quite impressive: MARHI, SPEECH, MosComArchitectura, the Genplan Institute of Moscow, and then her own architectural company. Its name Empate, which refers to the words “to draw” in Portuguese and “to empathize” in English, should not be misleading with its softness, as the firm freely works on different scales, including Integrated Territorial Development projects. We talked with Marina about various topics: urban planning experience, female leadership style, and even the love of architects for yachting.
Andrey Chuikov: “Optimum balance is achieved through economics”
The Yekaterinburg-based architectural company CNTR is in its mature stage: crystallization of principles, systematization, and standardization helped it make a qualitative leap, enhance competencies, and secure large contracts without sacrificing the aesthetic component. The head of the company, Andrey Chuikov, told us about building a business model and the bonuses that additional education in financial management provides for an architect.
The Fulcrum
Ostozhenka Architects have designed two astonishing towers practically on the edge of a slope above the Oka River in Nizhny Novgorod. These towers stand on 10-meter-tall weathered steel “legs”, with each floor offering panoramic views of the river and the city; all public spaces, including corridors, receive plenty of natural light. Here, we see a multitude of solutions that are unconventional for the residential routine of our day and age. Meanwhile, although these towers hark back to the typological explorations of the seventies, they are completely reinvented in a contemporary key. We admire Veren Group as the client – this is exactly how a “unique product” should be made – and we tell you exactly how our towers are arranged.
Crystal is Watching You
Right now, Museum Night has kicked off at the Museum of Architecture, featuring a fresh new addition – the “Crystal of Perception”, an installation by Sergey Kuznetsov, Ivan Grekov, and the KROST company, set up in the courtyard. It shimmers with light, it sings, it reacts to the approach of people, and who knows what else it can do.
The Secret Briton
The house is called “Little France”. Its composition follows the classical St. Petersburg style, with a palace-like courtyard. The decor is on the brink of Egyptian lotuses, neo-Greek acroteria, and classic 1930s “gears”; the recessed piers are Gothic, while the silhouette of the central part of the house is British. It’s quite interesting to examine all these details, attempting to understand which architectural direction they belong to. At the same time, however, the house fits like a glove in the context of the 20th line of St. Petersburg’s Vasilievsky Island; its elongated wings hold up the façade quite well.
The Wrap-Up
The competition project proposed by Treivas for the first 2021 competition for the Russian pavilion at EXPO 2025 concludes our series of publications on pavilion projects that will not be implemented. This particular proposal stands out for its detailed explanations and the idea of ecological responsibility: both the facades and the exhibition inside were intended to utilize recycled materials.
Birds and Streams
For the competition to design the Omsk airport, DNK ag formed a consortium, inviting VOX architects and Sila Sveta. Their project focuses on intersections, journeys, and flights – both of people and birds – as Omsk is known as a “transfer point” for bird migrations. The educational component is also carefully considered, and the building itself is filled with light, which seems to deconstruct the copper circle of the central entrance portal, spreading it into fantastic hyper-spatial “slices”.
Faraday Grid
The project of the Omsk airport by ASADOV Architects is another concept among the 14 finalists of a recent competition. It is called “The Bridge” and is inspired by both the West Siberian Exhibition of 1911 and the Trans-Siberian Railway bridge over the Irtysh River, built in 1896. On one hand, it carries a steampunk vibe, while on the other, there’s almost a sense of nostalgia for the heyday of 1913. However, the concept offers two variants, the second one devoid of nostalgia but featuring a parabola.
Midway upon the Journey of Our Life
Recently, Tatlin Publishing House released a book entitled “Architect Sergey Oreshkin. Selected Projects”. This book is not just a traditional book of the architectural company’s achievements, but rather a monograph of a more personal nature. The book includes 43 buildings as well as a section with architectural drawings. In this article, we reflect on the book as a way to take stock of an architect’s accomplishments.
Inverted Fortress
This year, there has been no shortage of intriguing architectural ideas around the Omsk airport. The project developed by the architectural company KPLN appeals to Omsk’s history as a wooden fortress that it was back in the day, but transforms the concept of a fortress beyond recognition: it “shaves off” the conical ends of “wooden logs”, then enlarges them, and then flips them over. The result is a hypostyle – a forest of conical columns on point supports, with skylights on top.
Transformation of Annenkirche
For Annenkirche (St. Anna Lutheran Church in St. Petersburg), Sergey Kuznetsov and the Kamen bureau have prepared a project that relies on the principles of the Venice Charter: the building is not restored to a specific date, historical layers are preserved, and modern elements do not mimic the authentic ones. Let’s delve into the details of these solutions.
The Paradox of the Temporary
The concept of the Russian pavilion for EXPO 2025 in Osaka, proposed by the Wowhaus architects, is the last of the six projects we gathered from the 2022 competition. It is again worth noting that the results of this competition were not finalized due to the cancellation of Russia’s participation in World Expo 2025. It should be mentioned that Wowhaus created three versions for this competition, but only one is being presented, and it can’t be said that this version is thoroughly developed – rather, it is done in the spirit of a “student assignment”. Nevertheless, the project is interesting in its paradoxical nature: the architects emphasized the temporary character of the pavilion, and in its bubble-like forms sought to reflect the paradoxes of space and time.
The Forum of Time
The competition project for the Russian Pavilion at EXPO 2025 in Osaka designed by Aleksey Orlov and Arena Project Institute consists of cones and conical funnels connected into a non-trivial composition, where one can feel the hand of architects who have worked extensively with stadiums and other sports facilities. It’s very interesting to delve into its logic, structurally built on the theme of clocks, hourglasses and even sundials. Additionally, the architects have turned the exhibition pavilion into a series of interconnected amphitheaters, which is also highly relevant for world exhibitions. We are reminding you that the competition results were never announced.
Mirrors Everywhere
The project by Sergey Nebotov, Anastasia Gritskova, and the architectural company “Novoe” was created for the Russian pavilion at EXPO 2025, but within the framework of another competition, which, as we learned, took place even earlier, in 2021. At that time, the competition theme was “digital twins”, and there was minimal time for work, so the project, according to the architect himself, was more of a “student assignment”. Nevertheless, this project is interesting for its plan bordering on similarity with Baroque projects and the emblem of the exhibition, as well as its diverse and comprehensive reflectiveness.
The Steppe Is Full of Beauty and Freedom
The goal of the exhibition “Dikoe Pole” (“Wild Field”) at the State Historical Museum was to move away from the archaeological listing of valuable items and to create an image of the steppe and nomads that was multidirectional and emotional – in other words, artistic. To achieve this goal, it was important to include works of contemporary art. One such work is the scenography of the exhibition space developed by CHART studio.
The Snowstorm Fish
The next project from the unfinished competition for the Russian Pavilion at EXPO 2025, which will be held in Osaka, Japan, is by Dashi Namdakov and Parsec Architects. The pavilion describes itself as an “architectural/sculptural” one, with its shape clearly reminiscent of abstract sculpture of the 1970s. It complements its program with a meditative hall named “Mendeleev’s Dreams”, and offers its visitors to slide from its roof at the end of the tour.
The Mirror of Your Soul
We continue to publish projects from the competition for the design of the Russian Pavilion at EXPO in Osaka 2025. We are reminding you that the results of the competition have not been announced, and hardly will ever be. The pavilion designed by ASADOV Architects combines a forest log cabin, the image of a hyper transition, and sculptures made of glowing threads – it focuses primarily on the scenography of the exhibition, which the pavilion builds sequentially like a string of impressions, dedicating it to the paradoxes of the Russian soul.
Part of the Ideal
In 2025, another World Expo will take place in Osaka, Japan, in which Russia will not participate. However, a competition for the Russian pavilion was indeed held, with six projects participating. The results were never announced as Russia’s participation was canceled; the competition has no winners. Nevertheless, Expo pavilion projects are typically designed for a bold and interesting architectural statement, so we’ve gathered all the six projects and will be publishing articles about them in random order. The first one is the project by Vladimir Plotkin and Reserve Union, which is distinguished by the clarity of its stereometric shape, the boldness of its structure, and the multiplicity of possible interpretations.
The Fortress by the River
ASADOV Architects have developed a concept for a new residential district in the center of Kemerovo. To combat the harsh climate and monotonous everyday life, the architects proposed a block type of development with dominant towers, good insolation, facades detailed at eye level, and event programming.
In the Rhombus Grid
Construction has begun on the building of the OMK (United Metallurgical Company) Corporate University in Nizhny Novgorod’s town of Vyksa, designed by Ostozhenka Architects. The most interesting aspect of the project is how the architects immersed it in the context: “extracting” a diagonal motif from the planning grid of Vyksa, they aligned the building, the square, and the park to match it. A truly masterful work with urban planning context on several different levels of perception has long since become the signature technique of Ostozhenka.
​Generational Connection
Another modern estate, designed by Roman Leonidov, is located in the Moscow region and brings together three generations of one family under one roof. To fit on a narrow plot without depriving anyone of personal space, the architects opted for a zigzag plan. The main volume in the house structure is accentuated by mezzanines with a reverse-sloped roof and ceilings featuring exposed beams.
Three Dimensions of the City
We began to delve into the project by Sergey Skuratov, the residential complex “Depo” in Minsk, located at Victory Square, and it fascinated us completely. The project has at least several dimensions to it: historical – at some point, the developer decided to discontinue further collaboration with Sergey Skuratov Architects, but the concept was approved, and its implementation continues, mostly in accordance with the proposed ideas. The spatial and urban planning dimension – the architects both argue with the city and play along with it, deciphering nuances, and finding axes. And, finally, the tactile dimension – the constructed buildings also have their own intriguing features. Thus, this article also has two parts: it dwells on what has been built and what was conceived
New “Flight”
Architects from “Mezonproject” have developed a project for the reconstruction of the regional youth center “Polyot”(“Flight”) in the city of Oryol. The summer youth center, built back in the late 1970s, will now become year-round and acquire many additional functions.
The Yauza Towers
In Moscow, there aren’t that many buildings or projects designed by Nikita Yavein and Studio 44. In this article, we present to you the concept of a large multifunctional complex on the Yauza River, located between two parks, featuring a promenade, a crossroads of two pedestrian streets, a highly developed public space, and an original architectural solution. This solution combines a sophisticated, asymmetric façade grid, reminiscent of a game of fifteen puzzle, and bold protrusions of the upper parts of the buildings, completely masking the technical floors and sculpting the complex’s silhouette.