Will Alsop is one of the most prominent architects in the UK. He is also a prolific artist whose expressionist paintings and sketches have been exhibited alongside his architectural projects in galleries and museums. Alsop’s buildings feature colorful, organic forms – “blobs and daubs” as he calls them. The architect was born in 1947 in Northampton in central England. He studied at the London’s Architectural Association in the late 1960s. Since 1981, Alsop worked in partnerships – first with his classmate John Lyall and then with Jan Störmer. In 2000 he formed Alsop Architects. In early 2006, he sold his office to the British design conglomerate SMC Group which owns a dozen independent architectural practices. Creatively, SMC Alsop remains fully independent and maintains offices in London, Beijing, Shanghai, Singapore and Toronto, employing 120 people worldwide. His projects never fail to attract attention and controversy. The most wellknown and adventurous are: the Hotel du Departement (a regional government complex) in Marseilles; the Sharp Centre for Design (a box thrown into the sky on thin multistory stilts) at Ontario College of Art & Design in Toronto; and Peckham Library in South London (which won the prestigious Stirling Prize in 2000). Alsop refers to his buildings as “objects of curiosity” – structures that are meant to inspire people, animate the landscape and encourage dreams of what could be, as well as ask questions like “what if...” I met with Will Alsop in his studio in London’s Battersea. We sat in the architect’s mezzanine office, overlooking a large open design studio, converted from a former warehouse. There are about fifty people working here on buildings that feature legs, beaks, wings and are dressed in skirts and hats. My first question was about Will’s extensive and hands-on experience working in Russia.
You used to have an office in Moscow from 1993 to 2000. Can you talk about your Russian adventure and why you left?
First, let me tell you why I came. I first went there in 1990 to do a workshop with students at the Moscow Architecture School, MArchI. For me it was interesting to be in a big city, undergoing dramatic political, economic and even religious changes. Then I started to visit more often to observe these changes. Over time I set up an office with an Englishman named James McAdam who spoke some Russian and a Russian lady Tanya Kalinina who spoke very good English. Now they have their own practice, McAdam Architects in both Moscow and London. The first project was to find a project, which we soon did. Subsequently we made a lot of friends and built a few buildings there. The first project was the Deutsche Bank building on Shepkina Street and the second major commission was the Millennium House on Trubnaya Street. Did you collaborate on the Millennium House with a local architect?
A French investor with whom we had worked for many years commissioned the Millennium House. The concept stage was developed solely by our office. We selected AB Ostozhenka, directed by Alexander Skokan, to assist us with the approval process. It was a very productive collaboration and Ostozhenka participated fully in the design process. In 2000 because of the shaky economy I pulled out. By then we had about 20 people, mostly Russians and I was coming once every two months. Maybe I should have downsized the office and stayed. It was a very interesting and creative time when young people especially had many original ideas about how to survive in such an economy. It was very exciting. It was also very corrupt, of course, not that I had anything to do with corruption but I was aware of it. That was a major challenge. For me these years in Moscow were to experience the city. I knew before I came that to create architecture would be very difficult. If at that time we could use Austrian or Finnish contractors… but none of my clients could afford it. The next choice was Irish or Turkish contractors – their work was of reasonable quality but it would limit the choice of materials. And then of course, there were Russian contractors. I’m sure it is very different now but at that time you never knew when the job would be finished and what the final price would be. Hence, any experimental architecture was very risky. Now, when looking at the magazines and sometimes visiting Moscow, I wonder about the quality of some of the latest projects there. Moscow needs to decide what it wants to be. It is a great city and it deserves great architecture.
What kind of architecture do you imagine being built in Moscow today and how different should it be, let’s say from London?
Well, obviously, there is climatic difference, which has a dramatic effect on what you do. For example, Moscow is much hotter than London in summer and this has a very definite effect. But that is not really what you mean with your question. Ideally, I don’t think the approach is any different whether you are in Moscow or some place in Africa. There will be differences imposed on you and you have to listen to them. What I really like to work with is expectations and aspirations. I like to think that I don’t have a particular style. I do very different things and in different ways. Some people say – there is an Alsop style. It is an insult to me because I like to avoid it. I have gone away from the idea of what architecture “should be”. My job is to discover what architecture could be and that voyage of discovery involves other people. I like working with people who live or work in the area of my projects and handing them the pencil or the paintbrush. Then you can have real fun trying to make sense of these engagements. My idea is not to change people’s view but to allow them to express their view. And that’s why I like working with people. I find it very strange when some architects make very grotesque and imposed forms. You can make a very good honest building with just materials alone.
What is a good honest building?
When it has good quality of construction, good lighting and particularly, when it pays attention to what is happening at the bottom because that is what most people experience. If I were a politician I would make a law in every city that everything from the ground to 10m and higher should float and not touch the ground. You could still eat and drink at the ground level but there would be no buildings. The ground should be given to people and gardens, not buildings. It would make our cities much happier, particularly in Moscow in winter when the sun angle is low. Think of Le Corbusier’s Unite d’Habitation in Marseilles, which is where I built my first elevated building Hotel du Departement. It was a big influence on my architecture.
You knew you wanted to be an architect very early on. Who introduced you to architecture and art?
Yes, I knew I wanted to be an architect before I knew what architects did and that might have something to do with the house next-door to where my family lived in Northampton. This was the house designed by Peter Behrens in 1926, which was one of the first modern rational houses in Britain. My mother always commented that it was an ugly house, but I found it very interesting because it did not look like any other house around. An older couple lived there and they often invited my sister and me for delicious ice cream so it always felt good to be there. There was furniture by Charles Rennie Mackintosh. It was a very design oriented atmosphere. Everything there was different and interesting and that was all that mattered. Then when I got older, I met an uncle of one of my friends, an eccentric stage designer who essentially taught me the history of the stage design – from the Greeks to the Constructivists and beyond. By then I knew how to draw, but he wanted to teach me anyhow. He started to teach me how to draw a brick. This was going on for three months. I tried to do it with shadows but he wanted just a line drawing and then we progressed to the tin can and so on. At the age of 16, I started working at a local architect’s office, while attending evening classes at school. So I learned about how to put traditional buildings together on a domestic scale. I was also aware of many progressive projects, such as by Archigram. So I decided to go away for a while and instead of going to architecture school, I first went to study art for a couple of years. Today I don’t really make any distinction between art and architecture.
Your architectural heroes are Le Corbusier, Sir John Soane, Mies van der Rohe and John Vanbrugh. How do these very different architects relate to your work?
I think there is no right way to make architecture and I think that is good. Our cities should have diversity. Uniformity makes life less interesting. There is a lot of that around Moscow or in the north of England. It makes people bored. Architecture is not about just having a roof over your head but about a feeling of belonging and a feeling of comfort. Sometimes it is very difficult to explain how to do that but I had people who told me that my buildings are very comfortable. They would come to me and ask – how do you do that? I don’t know and I don’t want to know because if I did all the fun and exploration about making architecture would be destroyed. You have to have faith. So all of these architects you mentioned, they are all very different but they all have qualities that we can all learn from.
What kind of architecture do you like today?
I like different projects. For example, I like the Hearst Building in New York by Norman Foster. When you drive north of Seventh Avenue there is a sensation of an optical illusion. Somehow, the general form is very pleasing to the eye. It is quite arresting and it is not like any other building. Its design suggests vertical growth and continuation, yet it has a good height and proportions and it gives a sense of presence. On the other hand, Foster’s projects in Moscow are very grotesque. Here in Britain we have a lot of very interesting engineers and our architects tend to celebrate structure more than others. I suppose Richard Rogers is the most notable example of that. It is very exciting and this idea of a clear floor plate and taking everything else to the edges or outside of the edges commercially makes a lot of sense, but at the end, it is almost denial of the proportions and the architecture. I don’t mind exposing structure but not for functional reasons alone. Otherwise, architecture is reduced to being High-Tech or a style. Once High- Tech becomes a style that is the end of architecture. What I like about architecture is that anything is possible as long as it is done with a real intent. For example, take the architects called FAT. I think they do very interesting work. I would never do what they do, but I enjoy it.
They have done some very sarcastic projects.
Oh yes, and I love them for that and I want to help them. I am working on a master plan of 1,500 homes in East Manchester and for some of the first houses there I introduced FAT to the clients and now they are building their homes. I think one of the roles of older architects is to help generations below them if they can. You went to Architectural Association. What kind of work did you do there and who were your professors at that time?
I think at the time I went to the AA it was the most interesting school, so it was the only place I applied to. And by the time I graduated, which was in 1972, I had been taught by every single architect of the Archigram. To me their work was like science fiction. It was about social aspects of architecture and more about imagining how people could live and work. Therefore, for my final year project I wrote a science fiction novel. I used the novel as a vehicle to illustrate things about the decentralization of cities. I invented different scenarios of how the cities would empty out and how we could occupy the landscape in the country. After Architectural Association, you worked for Cedric Price. What was that experience like and what did you learn from him?
That experience was very important. I was the project architect on the last building he built. One may argue that architecturally it was not an interesting building. But that was his style—which was absolutely no style at all. It gave me good practical experience. I’m not sure I really understood Cedric, but it didn’t matter. It was good for me. He was my second course in architecture. Now I tell my students in Vienna, “after you finish your school, if possible, try to work for someone you really admire for three to four years. Then you don’t have to think beyond that. It will become evident what you want to do.”
Do you have any of your former students in this studio? Yes, a couple of women.
Could you describe your art?
I like to draw and paint on canvas and spend time looking around. I don’t know if my work can be called art. Some people like it. Some people don’t like it. It doesn’t matter. In more recent years I began doing art for its own sake. I enjoy working together with various community groups. It is very stimulating and educational.
On your website it says, “Schools and academic buildings must be expansive, stimulating environments, allowing exchange between students and mentors”.
I am interested in how buildings affect communities. Originally, the Peckham library was meant to attract 12 thousand readers a month and now it attracts 40 thousand. And there are many people who go there for other reasons other than to read. You know, young men might go there to look at girls, but they might pick up a book or they might fall in love. That is also fine. Or, take the college in Toronto. Two months after the building was inished the number of applying students increased 300 percent. The mayor of Toronto told me that this modestly scaled building helped to increase the level of tourism in the city. So it seems that people respond very positively to our buildings and this response goes beyond these buildings’ original functions. I’m not interested in making monuments or icons. It is actually quite easy to build a building. But there is something else that turns it into architecture. The main question is – how does a new building contribute to the town or city it is in?
Could you talk about the Peckham Library design process?
For the Peckham Library design process, we engaged the local community and developed the project based on what people wanted. The building became more than just a library. It is a place where people meet, hang out, get married, take breastfeeding classes and so many other things. And when you come in you lift yourself out of everyday life. We also discovered that to solve financial or other social problems people would rather go to a library than a town hall, which is a lot more institutional. You initiated a dialogue with different community groups and invited them to participate in design workshops to discover what sort of building Peckham’s inhabitants wanted.
Yes. These workshops didn’t inform me as far as the form, but they helped to make the project successful in many other respects. There is a row of shops on the other side of the road, which were barely hanging on to their business and people were concerned about them. By lifting the building up, you get a direct view of these shops from the public space. These are not great shops but they are still there today and they are doing better than they ever did. The other fascinating thing about its elevated form is that the library can generate a lot of different events in the summer. You never know when it is going to rain in this country, but if you lift a building it becomes like an umbrella. So it doesn’t matter if it rains or not because you already have your big umbrella. Furthermore, even though there are a lot of bus stops around I observed that many people prefer to wait for their buses under the building. In addition to all of this, I also discovered that by lifting the library over the street, at the north side of the building you can see St. Paul’s Cathedral and it looks quite close despite the fact that the building is not that tall. This single aspect of the building, I think, did a lot for the people at Peckham and they suddenly realized that they are not lost in that huge part of South London. They are actually in the middle of London and that is something very important for people to know and identify themselves with.
What are your points of reference and inspirations?
I’m not sure if inspiration is important. You know the famous saying by Thomas Edison that ideas are one percent inspiration and 99 percent perspiration. You discover ideas by working and not dreaming. You only see things when you are moving the pencil. But beyond that I think travel is quite good because it broadens your expectations and brings attention to various qualities and spaces and it is not only about what you see but also what you feel.
Let’s go back to what kind of architecture is being built in Russia. Do you think inviting so many foreign architects to build there is a good idea?
I think the Russian architects should think that if Russia becomes more open then they would have more opportunities to do their work there or somewhere else. I think a good city is about diversity. For example, since the late 1970s we saw a lot of American architects coming to London, which they were interested in using as a stepping stone into mainland Europe. I guess they picked London because we speak almost the same language. Many American companies are well established here and they designed and built a lot of key projects, such as Canary Wharf and many others. For a long time it was not fair because it was very difficult for British architects to go work in America. Now the US is a lot more open and we share a lot of ideas and resources. Therefore, I think Russian architects should observe, learn from each other, build their reputation and surely they will be asked to do projects in other places. Architecture is a slow profession, but the fashion industry is a good indicator and already there is a big interest in what Russian fashion designers are doing. So the same will happen in architecture. But, I also think it is fair to expect from foreign architects a real commitment and not just the recycling of their ideas—what they used in Portland, Oregon or other places. That is why wherever we go we try to have a real presence and work with local people. For example, we work on our projects in China from our Shanghai office where we have about 25 people, many of whom are local, and we work with local contractors and produce our own working drawings. For us being there is also about experiencing culture and learning from it. Sometimes architects fail to produce original and critical work because their clients want them to design what they have seen in the West – iconic glass-clad towers that are associated with power and success, even if such models do not fit into a particular context.
Well, I have a drawer full of failed projects elsewhere that would do well in China or Russia. I can sell them to those clients. But of course, I’m just kidding. I would never do that.
What kind of architecture do you envision in the future and what kind of project would you like to realize?
I don’t think you can talk about the future because if I knew it I would be doing it. We are locked into the age we live in. For example, many architects are preoccupied now with climate change and issues of sustainability and ecology, but that is just general awareness. It doesn’t make architecture. Some architects market themselves as green architects. Well, we are too, but I want my clients to pick us for other reasons. You never pick an architect because he is good at plumbing. When pluming was first invented maybe there were architects who would say, “we understand plumbing”. In the future, I would like to see more sharing of ideas and on occasions, I would like the idea of working with other architects. It would be fun to do it in Moscow. As far as a project, I would like to do a hospital. I think most hospitals that are done in Britain today are done by architects who have done hospitals before – by a lot of American architects. But they are too much like a machine. I have visited a number of hospitals that actually make you ill. I think hospitals should be beautiful so when you come out you would fall in love again – that’s how spaces should make people feel.
Will Alsop Architects office in London 41 Parkgate Road, Battersea April 21, 2008
Park of sentiments
The project of “Romantic Park Tuchkov Buyan”, which was developed by the consortium of Studio 44 and WEST 8, and has won an international competition, combines sculptural landscape design and wooden structures, variety of spatial features and an eventful agenda, designed for diverse audience, with a beautiful and complex passeist idea of a palace park, meant to evoke thoughts and feelings.
The Gallery Approach
In this article, we are covering the concept of a Central District Clinic for 240 patients, designed by Ginzburg Architects, which won at a competition organized by the Architects Union and the Healthcare Ministry.
In this issue, we are publishing the concept of a standard clinic designed by UNK Project, which took second place in the competition organized by the Union of Architects of Russia in collaboration with the Healthcare Ministry.
From Foundation to Teaspoon
Based on the taste of their friendly clients, the architects Olga Budennaya and Roman Leonidov designed and built a house in the Moscow metropolitan area playing Art Nouveau. At the same time, they enriched the typology of a private house with modern functions of a garage loft and a children’s art studio.
Continuation and Development
The second “office” stage of Comcity, the most popular business park of the “New Moscow” area, continues the underground street of the already existing part of the complex, responding to its architectural identity.
A Comfortable City in Itself
The project that we are about to cover is seemingly impossible amidst human anthills, chaotically interspersed with old semi-neglected dachas. Meanwhile, the housing complex built on the Comcity business part does offer a comfortable environment of decent city: not excessively high-rise and moderately private as a version of the perfect modern urbanist solution.
Moving on the Edge
The housing complex “Litsa” (“Faces”) on Moscow’s Khodynka Field is one of the new grand-scale buildings that complement the construction around it. This particular building skillfully tackles the scale, subjugating it to the silhouette and the pattern; it also makes the most of the combination of a challenging land site and formidable square footage requirements, packing a whole number of features within one volume, so the house becomes an analogue of a city. And, to cap it all, it looks like a family that securely protects the children playing in the yard from... well, from everything, really.
Visual Stability Agent
A comparatively small house standing on the border of the Bolshevik Factory combines two diametrically opposite features: expensive materials and decorative character of Art Deco, and a wide-spaced, even somewhat brutal, facade grid that highlights a laminated attic.
The Faraday Cage
The project of the boutique apartment complex in the 1st Truzhenikov Lane is the architects’ attempt to squeeze a considerable volume into a tiny spot of land, at the same time making it look graceful and respectable. What came to their rescue was metal, stone, and curvilinear glass.
The Union of Art and Technology
His interest for architecture of the 1930’s is pretty much the guiding star for Stepan Liphart. In his project of the “Amo” house on St. Petersburg’s Vasilyevsky Island, the architect based himself on Moscow Art Deco - aesthetically intricate and decorated in scratch-work technique. As a bonus, he developed the city block typology as an organic structure.
The project that Evgeniy Gerasimov and Partners developed for Moscow’s Leningrad Avenue: the tallest building in the company’s portfolio, continuing the tradition of Moscow’s Stalin architecture.
In the project that they developed for a southern region of Russia, OSA Architects use multilayered facades that create an image of seaside resort architecture, and, in the vein of the latest trends of today, mix up different social groups that the residents belong to.
Just a Mirror for the Sun
The house that Sergey Skuratov designed in Nikolovorobinsky Alley is thought out down to the last detail. It adapts three historical facades, interprets a feeling of a complex city, is composed of many layers, and catches plenty of sunlight, from sunrises to sunsets. The architect himself believes that the main role of this house is creating a background for another nearby project of his, Art House in the Tessinsky Alley.
Part of the Whole
On June 5, the winners of Moscow Architectural Award were announced. The winners list includes the project of a school in Troitsk for 2,100 students, with its own astronomy dome, IT testing ground, museum, and a greenhouse on the roof.
Yet another project of a private school, in which Archimatika realizes the concept of aesthetic education and introduces a new tradition: combining Scandinavian and Soviet experience, turning to works of art, and implementing sustainable technologies.
In the “Parallel House” residence that he designed in the Moscow metropolitan area, the architect Roman Leonidov created a dramatic sculptural composition from totally basic shapes – parallelepipeds, whose collision turned into an exciting show.
In the Istra district of Moscow metropolitan area, the tandem of 4izmerenie and ARS-ST designed a sports complex – a monovolume that has the shape of a chamfered parallelepiped with a pointed “nose” like a ship’s bow.
Stairway to Heaven
The project of a hotel in the settlement of Yantarny is an example of a new recreational complex typology, and a new format that unites the hotel, the business, and the cultural functions. All of this is complemented by 100% integration with nature.
Cape of Good Hope
In this issue, we are showing all the seven projects that participated in a closed-door competition to create a concept for the headquarters of Gazprom Neft, as well as provide expert opinions on those projects.
The Outer Space
Honoring the 300th anniversary of the Kuznetsk coal fields in 2021, a new passenger terminal of the Aleksey Leonov Airport in the city of Kemerovo will be built, designed by GK Spectrum and ASADOV Architectural Bureau.
The Pivot of Narkomfin Building
Ginzburg Architects finished the restoration of the Narkomfin Building’s laundry unit – one of the most important elements of the famous monument of Soviet avant-garde architecture.
The housing complex “Respublika” is so large that it can be arguably called a micro-town, yet, at the same time, it easily overcomes most of the problems that usually arise with mass housing construction. How could Archimatika achieve that? We are examining that on the example of the first stage of the complex.
The Flowing Lines
The five houses of the “Svoboda” block belonging to the “Simvol” residential complex present a vivid example of all-rounded work performed by the architects on an integral fragment of the city, which became the embodiment of the approach to architecture that hitherto was not to be seen anywhere in Moscow: everything is subjected to the flow of lines – something like a stream, enhanced by the powerful pattern of the facades akin to “super-graphics”.
A City by the Water
The concept of a large-scale housing development at the edge of Voronezh, near the city reservoir, or “the sea”, as it is locally called, uses the waterside height difference to create a sophisticated public space, paying a lot of attention to the distribution of masses that determine the look of the future complex if viewed from the opposite bank of the river.
A Journey to the Country of Art Deco
The “Little France” residential complex on the 20th line of the Vasilyevsky Island presents an interesting make-believe dialogue between its architect, Stepan Liphart, the architect of the New Hermitage, masters of the Silver Age, and Soviet Art Deco, about interesting professional topics, such as a house with a courtyard in the historical center of Saint Petersburg, and the balance between the wall and the stained glass in the architectonics of the facade. Here are the results of this make-believe conversation.
A House in a Port
This housing complex on the Dvinskaya Street is the first case of modern architecture on the Gutuevsky Island. The architectural bureau “A-Len” thoroughly explores the context and creates a landmark for further transformations of this area of Saint Petersburg.
Balance of Infill Development
Anatoly Stolyarchuk Architectural Studio is designing a house that inadvertently prevails over the surrounding buildings, yet still tries to peacefully coexist with the surrounding environment, taking it to a next level.
The Precious Space
Evolution Design and T+T Architects reported about the completion of the interior design project of Sberbank headquarters on the Kutuzovsky Avenue. In the center of the atrium, hovers the “Diamant” meeting room; everything looks like a chest full of treasures, including the ones of a hi-tech kind.
Big Little Victory
In a small-sized school located in Domodedovo in Moscow metropolitan area, ASADOV_ architects did a skillful job of tackling the constraints presented by the modest budget and strict spatial limitations – they designed sunlit classrooms, comfortable lounges, and even a multi-height atrium with an amphitheater, which became the center of school life.
The Social Biology of Landscape
The list of new typologies of public spaces and public projects has been expanded yet again — thanks to Wowhaus. This time around, this company came up with a groundbreaking by Russian standards approach to creating a place where people and animals can communicate.
Watched by the Angels from up Above
Held in the General Staff building of the Hermitage Museum, the anniversary exhibition of “Studio 44” is ambitious and diverse. The exhibition was designed to give a comprehensive showcase of the company’s architecture in a whole number of ways: through video, models, drawings, installations, and finally, through a real-life project, the Enfilade, which the exhibition opens up, intensifies, and makes work the way it was originally intended.
A New Version of the Old City
The house at Malaya Ordynka, 19, fits in perfectly with the lineup of the street, looking even as if it straightened the street up a little, setting a new tone for it – a tone of texture, glitter, “sunny” warmth, and, at the same time, reserved balance of everything that makes the architecture of an expensive modern house.
Stepan Liphart: “Standing your ground is the right thing to do”
A descendant of German industrialists, “Jophan’s son”, and an architect, speaks about how studying architectural orders tempers one’s character, and how a team of just a few people can design grand-scale housing projects to be built in the center of Saint Petersburg. Also: Santa Claus appearing in a Stalin high-rise, an arch portal to the outer space, mannerism painting, and the palaces of Paris – all covered in an interview with Stepan Liphart.
Honey and Copper
In the Moscow area, the architect Roman Leonidov designed the “Cool House” residence, very much in the spirit of Frank Lloyd Wright, spreading it parallel to the ground, and accentuating the horizontal lines in it. The color composition is based on juxtaposition of warm wood of a honey hue and cold copper blue.
The Ring on the Saisara Lake
The building of the Philharmonic Hall and the Theater of Yakut Epos, standing on the shore of the sacred lake, is inscribed into an epic circle and contains three volumes, reminiscent of the traditional national housing. The roof is akin to the Alaas – a Yakut village standing around a lake. In spite of its rich conceptual agenda, the project remains volumetrically abstract, and keeps up a light form, making the most of its transparency, multiple layers, and reflections.
Architecture of Evanescence
On the Vernadskogo Avenue, next to the metro station, appeared a high-rise landmark that transformed the entire area: designed by UNK Project, the “Academic” business center uncovered, in the form of its architecture, the meanings of the local place names.
The Theater and Music Circles
The contest-winning ambitious grand-scale project of the main theater and concert complex of the Moscow area includes three auditoriums, a yard – a public area – a higher school of music, and a few hotels. It promises to become a high-profile center for the classical music festivals on a national scale.
The Line of a Hardened Breakthrough
Designed by Stepan Liphart, the housing complex “Renaissance” continues the line of the historical center of Saint Petersburg, reinterpreting the Leningrad Art Deco and the neoclassical architecture of the 1930-50’s in reference to the civilization challenges posed by our century.