​Andrei and Nikita Asadov: “We wanted to be as objective as possible”

An interview with the initiators and ideologists of the project “Russian Architecture. The Modern Era” about the principles of shortlisting, architecture as an art object, and plans for the future.

Elena Petukhova

Interviewed by:
Elena Petukhova
Translated by:
Anton Mizonov

27 May 2019

The ideologists of the project “Russian Architecture. The Modern Era”, Andrey and Nikita Asadov believe that modern Russian architecture has passed yet another historical milestone and deserves not only to sum up the results but also to discuss plans for the future. We spoke to the two architects about the topic of the exhibition, about its three formats, and about the significance of this project both for the professional community and for anyone else who might be interested.

30 years is a serious figure for the modern history. How did you come round to the idea of organizing this exhibition?

Andrey Asadov: In the spring of 1989, there were four architectural offices organized under the aegis of the Union of Architects of Russia, including the one that was headed by Alexander Rafailovich Asadov, our father. We realized that this was a whole layer of history, which is 30 years old this year, and we decided to sum up some of the achievements and trace back the chronology of the modern history of Russian architecture in general.

Nikita Asadov: It was important for us to study this piece of history and understand what happened at which moment in time, and what was valuable about it, in order to make sure we don’t miss anything out, to keep it up, and pass it on to our successors. Also, the biggest question: what is the place of architecture in the general historical context? How can we use the accumulated potential, multiply, and independently formulate the vector that it would be interesting to develop in the future?

Andrey Asadov: Over the last 30 years, Russian architecture has been through a whole evolutionary process that has to do directly with the development of this country. Our team, which also includes Elena Petukhova and Julia Shishalova, singled out the main stages of this evolution and studied this interaction. The exhibition is based on a grand-scale research thanks to which we were able to put together quite an objective picture.

How was this research organized technically?

Andrey Asadov: We prepared and sent out feedback forms to almost 300 experts: architects, literary critics, journalists – everybody who might be linked to our profession in one way or another. We asked them to name the brightest architectural highlights, personalities, and the most interesting projects. The respondents could either tick the boxes from the list that we offered or suggest their own events and/or projects, and most of our respondents made a use of this opportunity. Thanks to this option, many important events got into the focus of our research, including regional ones. Then we counted the number of votes for these or those milestones of out architectural chronicle and formed the final list of events and projects.

Did you make any personal preferences in shortlisting the projects for this exhibition? Or what we see at the exhibition was solely defined by this final ranking?

Andrey Asadov: What is exhibited is the pool of projects that scored the greatest number points out of all the projects mentioned in the research.

Nikita Asadov: The only freedom that we left for the architects was freedom to propose this or that project for the exhibition out of the number of the buildings that did not become the leaders of the poll. This way, the exhibition features the results of a, let's say, double ranking – based on the number of votes in the research and based on how important they were for their authors.

OK, you did not make any personal preferences in shortlisting the participants of the exhibition in order to get as objective a picture as possible. Are there any events or projects that you would like to mention now, subjectively?

Andrey Asadov: Of course, a greater impression is made by fresh projects, while the earlier ones are perceived not as acutely – but they all are milestones in our architectural history. For example, some of the shortlisted exhibitors are represented by their earlier projects. However, this does not mean that those projects were the best ones they ever did – it’s just that for this specific exhibition a project was chosen that influenced the development of architecture in that specific moment in time, and is particularly important for its author.

We tried to make this cross section as objective as possible, it was interesting to see how the architects themselves evaluate the achievements of their fellow colleagues. At the same time, we are genuinely happy that one of our projects also got shortlisted for the top-30.

Did you make this architectural and historical statistics only in reference to Moscow or in reference to Russian regions as well?

Nikita Asadov: In terms of personalities, we did not limit ourselves with Moscow and Saint Petersburg – we gave the experts an opportunity to cover the entire country. Based in that, the big picture was formed.

Andrey Asadov: And our team decided to show the results of this research in three formats at once.

Such as?

Andrey Asadov: The first format is an exhibition that will be open until the 16th of June in the Schusev State Museum of Architecture

Nikita Asadov: This exhibition will popularize as much as possible the very research project; this is why the choice of venue was so important for us. The architecture museum was the perfect place because it was designed not only for the professional community alone but for the general public as well.

Andrey Asadov: Toward the end of the exhibition, we will present a book that was created by a separate team headed by Julia Shishalova with the support of Moscow City Architecture Committee and the website of Archcouncil of Moscow. Fragments of this book will be presented in the format of a timeline showing general historical events and architectural events. Yet another format is the website that was developed by the great team called Likesisters. In addition to the timeline, it shows a unique collection of video interviews with the participants of the project.

Nikita Asadov: And still another important part of the exhibition is the discussion program. This is a more “alive” interactive format, where you can talk to the authors of the research, as well as with the authors of the works showcased at the exhibition. You can listen, think, and ask questions. And this is the most comprehensive and vivid representation of the exhibition as an event, within the framework of which will be lived this historical fragment, and the attitude will be formed as to where we are headed next.

What do you think is the meaning and the usefulness of such projects for the architectural community? How can the professionals benefit from your research work?

Andrey Asadov: The way I see it, it is always worthwhile analyzing your past in order to have a better understanding of what you have achieved and where exactly you are going.

Nikita Asadov: To me, it was interesting to see this rather compressed selection. While, speaking until 1990, there is a whole number of selections from different periods, from avant-garde to paper architecture, trying to make a similar selection from this new era fragment from the history of Russian architecture was a pretty exciting thing to do. Trying to figure out, among other things, how you go about forming such selections making sure that they are as objective as possible. I think that this material will be in demand in the future because we have been able to keep up its objectivity, and this is why I think it was particularly valuable.

The Museum of Architecture, which is hosting your exhibition, has a rather large traffic of tourists and people who only recently became interested in architecture. Does your exhibition address this type of visitor in any way?

Nikita Asadov: This is a great opportunity to make out, within one place and within a rather short space of time, just what modern architecture is all about, what new things appeared over the last three decades, and what achievements are the most attention-worthy and valuable from the professionals' point of view. 

Andrey Asadov: Architecture is considered to be the mother of all arts, but over the last few decades the very perception of architecture has been grossly devaluated – it turned into some unwelcome addition to the construction industry. To us, it is very important to make sure that modern architecture is perceived not only as part of the history of this country, but also as an independent art in its own right.

This is why, all the professional rankings aside, we tried to make our exhibition as vivid and as popular possible. And this is why we asked the authors of the shortlisted projects to present their buildings as art objects that illustrate the main idea of the building. I think that this is the most attractive part of the exposition – something mysterious, volumetric, and sometimes even with audio and video effects. I hope that such a format will be interesting to a large circle of public.

The exhibition will be open for a month. Will there be any continuation of this project after the exhibition?

Andrey Asadov: We hope that after the exhibition is over, the project will live on to set the basis for the future analysis to be done in the course of the next decade. Due to the fact that the preparation time for our project was limited, our team did not ask all of the expert it could have, but this project is modular, particularly its online version. It can be easily augmented with stories from the past and the future.

Also, we want to organize an exhibition tour of the project in the regions, in each of which it could be augmented by the regional collection of the best local buildings and their history. It is very important to attach the entire country and not limit ourselves with just Moscow. Time will show how well we will be able to implement that idea but there is already some interest from the Ministry of Culture and the Museum of Architecture!
The exhibition “Russian Architecture. The Modern Era” in the Schusev State Museum of Architecture
Copyright: © ARCHNEWAGE
Nikita and Andrey Asadov
Copyright: © ARCHNEWAGE
The collection of designer art objects. The exhibition “Russian Architecture. The Modern Era” in the Schusev State Museum of Architecture
Copyright: © ARCHNEWAGE
  • zooming
    1 / 4
    The inauguration of the exhibition “Russian Architecture. The Modern Era” in the Schusev State Museum of Architecture. The presentation by the curator of the exhibition Andrey Asadov
    Copyright: © ARCHNEWAGE
  • zooming
    2 / 4
    The inauguration of the exhibition “Russian Architecture. The Modern Era” in the Schusev State Museum of Architecture. The presentation by the director of the museum Elizaveta Likhacheva
    Copyright: © ARCHNEWAGE
  • zooming
    3 / 4
    The exhibition “Russian Architecture. The Modern Era” in the Schusev State Museum of Architecture
    Copyright: © ARCHNEWAGE
  • zooming
    4 / 4
    The exhibition “Russian Architecture. The Modern Era” in the Schusev State Museum of Architecture
    Copyright: © ARCHNEWAGE
  • zooming
    1 / 6
    The collection of designer art objects. Installation inspired by the “Pavilion of Vodka Ceremonies” by Alexander Brodsky. The exhibition “Russian Architecture. The Modern Era” in the Schusev State Museum of Architecture
    Copyright: © ARCHNEWAGE
  • zooming
    2 / 6
    The collection of designer art objects. The exhibition “Russian Architecture. The Modern Era” in the Schusev State Museum of Architecture
    Copyright: © ARCHNEWAGE
  • zooming
    3 / 6
    The collection of designer art objects. Installation inspired by the “House by the Sea”. Evgeny Gerasimov, “Evgeny Gerasimov and Partners” and Sergey Tchoban, “NPS Tchoban Voss”. The exhibition “Russian Architecture. The Mode
    Copyright: © ARCHNEWAGE
  • zooming
    4 / 6
    The collection of designer art objects. Installation inspired by “Picturesque Bridge”. N.Shumakov, Metrogiprotrans. The exhibition “Russian Architecture. The Modern Era” in the Schusev State Museum of Architecture
    Copyright: © ARCHNEWAGE
  • zooming
    5 / 6
    The collection of designer art objects. Installation inspired by the “White Horse” mixed-purpose development. ABD Architects together with Wojciechowski Architekci (Poland). The exhibition “Russian Architecture. The Modern Era” in the Schusev St
    Copyright: © ARCHNEWAGE
  • zooming
    6 / 6
    The exhibition “Russian Architecture. The Modern Era” in the Schusev State Museum of Architecture
    Copyright: © ARCHNEWAGE
The collection of designer art objects. The exhibition “Russian Architecture. The Modern Era” in the Schusev State Museum of Architecture
Copyright: © ARCHNEWAGE
The inauguration of the exhibition “Russian Architecture. The Modern Era” in the Schusev State Museum of Architecture. The architects Mikhail Filippov, Andrey Bokov, and Tatiana Shavina, the reviewer of “Construction Business” news agency
Copyright: © ARCHNEWAGE
The collection of designer art objects. Installation inspired by the "Wings/Ruins" Narine Tyutcheva, Rozhdestvekka Architects. The exhibition “Russian Architecture. The Modern Era” in the Schusev State Museum of Architecture
Copyright: © ARCHNEWAGE
The exhibition “Russian Architecture. The Modern Era” in the Schusev State Museum of Architecture
Copyright: © ARCHNEWAGE

27 May 2019

Elena Petukhova

Interviewed by:

Elena Petukhova
Translated by:
Anton Mizonov
Headlines now
Julius Borisov: “The “Island” housing complex is a unique project – we took it on with...
One of the largest housing projects of today’s Moscow – the “Ostrov” (“Island”) housing complex built by Donstroy – is now being actively built in the Mnevniky Floodplain. They are planning to build about 1.5M square meters of housing on an area of almost 40 hectares. We are beginning to examine this project– first of all, we are talking to Julius Borisov, the head of the architectural company UNK, which works with most of the residential blocks in this grand-scale project, as well as with the landscaping part; the company even proposed a single design code for the entire territory.
A Balanced Solution
The residential complex “Balance” on Moscow’s Ryazansky Prospekt is one of the large-scale, and relatively economical (again, by Moscow standards) housing projects. Its first phase has already been built and landscaped; the work on the others is in progress. Nevertheless, it has an integral internal logic, which is based on the balance of functions, height, and even image and space composition. The proposed solutions are recognizable and laconic, so that each of them was reduced by the authors to a graphic “logo”. To see everything, you have to flip through the pages and look through to the end.
Horror Vacui
In the city of Omsk, ASADOV architects took on a very challenging task: they are developing a concept of a public and residential complex, which involves reconstructing the city’s first thermal power station standing right next to Omsk’s first fortress. This territory has already seen a lot of projects designed for it, and the residential function of this land site has been the subject of heated debate. In this article, we are examining the project in question, aimed at developing a mid-scale city fabric suited for the historical center. We also examine the above-mentioned debate. Seriously, will this project save this place or will it bring it to ruin?
A Multi-Faced Grotto
This building, seemingly small, unremarkable, semi-ruined, and not even very ancient – the Grotto in the Bauman Garden – was restored by the “People’s Architect” architectural company with all the care applicable to a heritage monument. They preserved the romantic appeal of the ruins, added multimedia content, and explored the cascading fountain, which, as it turned out, was completely preserved. Brace yourself for a long story!
First among Equals
The building of a kindergarten in the town of Beloyarsky is more than just another example of a modern educational space. Its design began a long time ago; it is located in Russia’s Far North; it is also a state-owned facility that is subject to regulations, and had to cut costs during construction (as usual). However, the design is contemporary, the layout is modern, and the building feels very fresh. The project is planned to be replicated.
Gustave Falconnier
In the “ruin” wing of Moscow’s Museum of Architecture, an exhibition of “glass bricks” by Gustave Falconnier is open. These “bricks” are essentially the predecessors of glass blocks, but more complex and beautiful. The exhibition shows genuine “bricks”, buildings composed of them, the history of the destruction of Falconnier windows in the building of the State Archives, and it also became one of the reasons to revive this unique production technology.
​Streamline for City Canyons
Stepan Liphart has designed two houses for two small land sites situated in the area surrounding the Varshavsky Railway Station, which is being intensively developed now. The sites are situated close but not next to each other, and they are different, yet similar: the theme is the same but it is interpreted in different ways. In this issue, we are examining and comparing both projects.
​The Eastern Frontier
“The Eastern Arc” is one of the main land resources of Kazan’s development, concentrated in the hands of a single owner. The Genplan Institute of Moscow has developed a concept for the integrated development of this territory based on an analytical transport model that will create a comfortable living environment, new centers of attraction, and new workplaces as well.
A School of Our Time
On the eve of the presentation of the new book by ATRIUM, dedicated to the design of schools and other educational facilities, based on the architects’ considerable experience, as well as expert judgments, we are examining the Quantum STEM school building, constructed according to their project in Astana. Furthermore, this building is planned to be the first one to start a new chain. The architects designed it in full accordance with modern standards but sometimes they did break away from them – only to confirm the general development rules. For example, there are two amphitheaters in the atrium, and there is an artificial hill in the yard that is meant to make the flat terrain of the Kazakhstan steppe more eventful.
The Fluffy Space
Designing the passenger terminal of the Orenburg airport, ASADOV architects continue to explore the space theme that they first introduced in Saratov and Kemerovo airports. At the same time, the architects again combine the global and the local, reflecting topics inspired by the local conceptual context. In this case, the building is “covered” by an Orenburg downy shawl – an analogy that is recognizable enough, yet not literal; some will see the reference and some won’t.
The White Fitness Center
The white health and fitness center, designed by Futura Architects at the entrance to St. Petersburg’s New Piter residential complex, provides the developing area not only with functional but also with sculptural diversity, livening up the rows of the brick city blocks with the whiteness of its seamless facades, cantilevered structures, and dynamic inclined lines.
The New Dawn
In their project of a technology park to be built on the grounds of “Integrated Home-Building Factory 500” in Tyumen Oblast – the biggest in Russia – the HADAA architects preserve not just the industrial function of the giant hangar built in the late 1980s and 90% of its structures, but also respond to its imagery. They also propose a “gradient” approach to developing the available areas: from open public ones to staff-only professional spaces. The goal of this approach is to turn the technology park into the driver for developing the business function between the industrial zones and the future residential area in accordance with the Integrated Land Development program.
​Tame Hills for New Residents
T+T Architects have reported that they have completed the landscaping project for the yard of the first stage of Alexandrovsky Garden housing complex in Ekaterinburg – the landscape complements the contextual architecture, tailored for the buyers’ preferences and downtown standards, with bold neo modernist master strokes and lush and diverse vegetation.
The Crystal of the City Block
The typology and plastique of large housing complexes move with the times, and you can sometimes find new subtleties in the scope of seemingly familiar solutions. The Sky Garden complex combines two well-known themes, forming a giant residential area consisting of tall slender towers, placed at the perimeter of a large yard, in which a crossroads of two pedestrian promenades is “dissolved”.
Sunshine, Air, and Water
The construction of the “Solnechny” (“Sunny”) summer camp, designed by ARENA project institute, has been completed, the largest summer camp within the legendary Artek seaside resort for children. It was conceived still in Soviet time, but it was not implemented. The modern version surprises you with sophisticated engineering solutions that are combined with a clear-cut structure: together, they generate Asher-esque spaces.
​Art Deco at the Edge of Space
The competition project by Stepan Liphart – a high-end residential complex executed in a reserved classicist style in close proximity to the Kaluga Space Museum – responds equally well to the context and to the client’s brief. It is moderately respectable, moderately mobile and transparent, and it even digs a little into the ground to comply with strict height restrictions, without losing proportions and scale.
​A Hill behind the Wall
The master plan of a new residential area in Yuzhno-Sakhalinsk, developed by the Genplan Institute of Moscow with the participation of Kengo Kuma & Associates, is based on the complexities and advantages of the relief of the foothills: the houses are arranged in cascades, and multi-level improvement penetrates all the blocks, continuing in forest trails.
Going, Going, Gone!
The housing complex “Composers’ Residences” has been built in accordance with the project by Sergey Skuratov, who won the international competition back in 2011. It all began from the image search and “cutting off all spare”, and then implementing the recognizable Skuratov architecture. It all ended, however, in tearing down the buildings of the Schlichterman factory, whose conservation was stipulated by all the appropriate agencies prior to approving Skuratov’s project. This story seems to be educational and important for understanding the history of all the eleven years, during which the complex was designed and built.
The Life of Iron
The building of the Vyksa Metallurgy Museum, designed by Nikita Yavein and Sergey Padalko, provides for the natural aging of metal – it is planned that the iron will gradually rust – at the same time utilizing the advanced type of construction, based on metal’s ability to stretch. The building will be constructed from pipes and rolled steel supplied by OMK company, as well as from recycled bricks.
​And the Brook is Flowing
ASADOV Architects have designed a master plan for developing a residential area at the outskirts of Kaliningrad: a regular grid of housing blocks is enriched by large-scale public facilities, the main “artery” of the new area being the fortification channel that regains its original function.
Off We Go!
The new terminal of the Tomsk airport is being designed by ASADOV bureau. The architects keep on developing its identity, building the imagery upon the inventions of Nikolai Kamov, whose name the airport bears. The result is laconic, light, and, as always, levitating.
Maximum Flexibility
The Multispace Dinamo, which recently opened within the Arena business center, is an example of a project that is entirely based upon cutting-edge approaches and technologies. It is managed via a mobile application, special software was created for it, and the spaces are not just multifunctional but carefully mixed up, like some kind of jigsaw puzzle that allows the office workers to mix their working routine for better efficiency.
A Factory’s Path
Last week, the new center for constructivist studies “Zotov” hosted its first exhibition named “1922. Constructivism. The Inception”. The idea of creating this center belongs to Sergey Tchoban, while the project of the nearest houses and adjusting the building of the bread factory for the new museum function was done by the architect in collaboration with his colleagues from SPEECH. We decided that such a complex project should be examined in its entirety – and this is how we came up with this long-read about constructivism on Presnya, conservation, innovation, multilayered approach, and hope.
The Savelovsky Axis
The business center, situated right in the middle of a large city junction next to the Savelovsky Railway Station takes on the role of a spatial axis, upon which the entire place hinges: it spins like a spiral, alternating perfect glass of the tiers and deep recessions of inter-tier floors that conceal little windows invented by the architects. It is sculptural, and it claims the role of a new city landmark, in spite of its relatively small height of nine floors.
Parametric Waves
In the housing complex Sydney City, which FSK Group is building in the area of Shelepikhinskaya Embankment, Genpro designed the central city block, combining parametric facades and modular technology within its architecture.
The Multitone
The new interior of the Action Development headquarters can be regarded as an attempt to design the perfect “home” for the company – not just comfortable but broadcasting the values of modern development. It responds to the context, yet it is built on contrast, it is fresh but cozy, it is dynamic, yet it invites you to relax – everything of this coexists here quite harmoniously, probably because the architects found an appropriate place for each of the themes.
Refinement No Longer Relevant
A few days ago journalists were shown the building of Bread Factory #5, renovated upon the project by Sergey Tchoban. In this issue, we are publishing Grigory Revzin’s thoughts about this project.
The Comb of Strelna
In this issue, we are taking a close look at the project that won the “Crystal Daedalus” award – the “Veren Village” housing complex in Strelna, designed by Ostozhenka. Its low-rise format became a trigger for typological and morphological experiments – seemingly, we are seeing recognizable trends, yet at the same time there are a multitude of subtleties that are a pleasure to go into. Having studied this project in detail, we think that the award is well-deserved.
A Tectonic Shift
For several years now, Futura Architects have been working with the “New Peter” residential area in the south of St. Petersburg. In this article, we are covering their most recent project – a house, in which the architects’ architectural ideas peacefully coexist with the limitations of comfort-class housing, producing a “multilayered” effect that looks very attractive for this typology.
Three “Green” Stories
In this issue, we are examining three environmental urban projects showcased by the Genplan Institute of Moscow at the Zodchestvo festival. The scale of the projects is really diverse: from gathering information and suggestions from the residents on a city scale to growing meadow grass between houses to paintings, which, as it turned out, possess power to cure trees, healing their wounded bark. + a list of kinds of plants natural for Moscow to help the developer.