Shakespeare's Shelter

An interview with the winner of "Home for Shakespeare" contest, an architect of Wowhaus, Esbergen Sabitov, and the company leader Oleg Shapiro about how a tower became a home for the famous playwright.

Interviewed by:

Translated by:
Anton Mizonov

22 August 2016

Interview

Archi.ru
- How did you guys came to the idea of taking part in this "Home for Shakespeare" contest?

Oleg Shapiro:
- This project was initially prepared for "Arkhstoyanie" Festival. This year's theme was "shelter", and they invited us to participate. By joint efforts of the members of our team we came up with a shelter in the form of a tower, and we called our project "Perpendicular". This was our joint project that was developed under my supervision but Esbergen at once came up with a very eccentric version that, regretfully, did not fall in line with the ideas of our team. I also drew a parallel - just like we wanted to place our tower in an inconvenient place (on a slope and perpendicular to it), so Esbergen wanted to "cross" our joint idea.

We could not accept his version for "Arkhstoyanie", but he was able to find another great application for his work - he sent it to "Home for Shakespeare" contest and won it! I saw from the very start that this was a great work, and a great work simply cannot go to waste. Then we refrained from our idea to do a "shelter" in accordance with "Arkhstoyanie" concept of this year, and started designing a bridge in Nikola-Lenivets. Esbergen also poured his soul into that job, and, actually, it is thanks to his efforts that we were ultimately able to build that bridge. He came up with lots of ingenious solutions that helped us implement our project in spite of the fact, as always, we were short of money, time and manpower. But Esbergen and his team were able to handle the first construction stage - which pretty much gives us a reason to believe that soon we are going to see the second stage of the bridge construction.

zooming — Esbergen Sabitov at the bridge in Nikola-Lenivets. 2016. Photo © Olga Grib

- Could you please share more about the tower that you prepared for "Arkhstoyanie"?

Esbergen Sabitov:
- I don't think that my idea of the tower for "Arkhstoyanie" was at odds with the context. A tower is something that provides a connection between heaven and earth. Our tower consists of two parts: an open and a closed one. Down below, underground, I designed the closed part, very much like a bunker. This is a shelter in the direct meaning of the word. Then the tower itself and its upper landing are open; this is rather a metaphorical interpretation of the idea of "shelter" - a solitary place for introverts that gives you an opportunity to achieve your dreams and tear yourself away from the earth.

At "Arkhstoyanie" we were given a different situation: the tower was to stand near a river, on a hill, on the axis of the bridge direction. Such kind of terrain conditioned our search for the right design solution. This question was considered by all of us, a team of eight people. Ultimately, we opted for the most simple and cost-effective version of a framework construction. My idea, however, was different even from the technical standpoint: together with our designer, we came up with a "string" strutted tower. This same principle is used, for example, in the Ostankino TV tower - the core and the ropes holding it. My tower was even fairly well received but later on they decided that this was a very complex and prohibitively expensive solution, even though I do not agree with this at all. Just as was the case with the bridge - if you have a goal that you are really committed to, you will be sure to find a solution.

But, as Oleg Shapiro said, my project of the tower was laid off. We started doing the bridge. And, while in the process of doing the bridge, I saw at Archi.ru the announcement of "Home for Shakespeare" contest. I learned from the organizers about the details and the technical specifications, and it turned out that this was solely a contest of proposals and concepts, and you could choose virtually any project, ways of presentation, and style of description. This is why I decided to use for that contest my project of the then-forgotten tower that I had initially prepared for "Arkhstoyanie".

- What changes did you make to the project in order to turn it into "Home for Shakespeare"?

Esbergen Sabitov:
- The subject of the contest was not so much about designing a house for a human being to live in it, as about evoking allusions and associations with Shakespeare and his cosmos. This was not about "designing a house", like a project with a bathroom and a kitchen but a world where a certain person exists. This was the way it was put in the contest assignment: tell a story through architecture. This is why I decided that a tower really matches "Shakespeare's cosmos", the connection between the two fields, or, poles, if you want - creativity and society. Since the choice of the situation was mine to make, my "Home for Shakespeare" is situated in its own environment, on the hillside of Nikola-Lenivets, as if on a theater stage. But then again, one should say that such a tower can be built in any situation - which again proves Shakespeare's quote that "all the world’s a stage".

The tower is associated with the Globe Theater founded by Shakespeare. In the explanatory note to my project I wrote that tower's inner stairway must have on it all the heroes of Shakespeare plays - they would be not only actors but they would be spectators as well, examining the surroundings and recognizing their roles in it. This is why the difference between "Home for Shakespeare" from the "Arkhstoyanie" tower is rather ideological than technical.

The line of the "shelter", an open and a closed space (a tower and a bunker respectively), like I said, is still there in the project. Based on the connection between these two parts, I created a video that became a part of my contest presentation of the project. I made it in full accordance with the rules of plot development, and created a video version of my project - you approach the tower, its view from the hillside becoming the establishing shot; one's ascent uphill stands for the swell of the rhythm, the struggle, and the drama; one's descent into the bunker is a tragedy, and one's return to daylight is the finale, a happy end.

- Why did you opt for the movie as a means of showcasing your contest project?

Esbergen Sabitov:
- I asked the organizers how I should showcase or present my project, and they said that there were no limits on the ways of presenting it. I had a model ready, and I decided to make an animated video out of it. Simply submitting drawings and visualizations seemed to me a boring thing to do. And as for the movie, it was sort of recreation for me, something that helped me to distract myself from working on the bridge. If you watch the video you will see realism flow into metaphors, get distorted to the point of drama and then get back to reality again. To me, it was an exciting experience - producing a video about my project.

- Why did you think that it was the tower project that matched the subject of the contest best of all?

Esbergen Sabitov:
- I studied Shakespeare's biography and I learned that his family crest indeed displayed a spear. And my tower, standing perpendicular to the hill, also pierces the earth like a spear. This seemed like an interesting parallel to me.

- Did you specify in any way the functions of the rooms in the bunker?

Esbergen Sabitov:
- No, I didn't. What the bunker does, it simply continues the idea of developing an architectural form based on the laws of theater play. Its levels gradually go deeper underground, the walls are closing in on you, and you feel ever lonelier. Meaning - in a nutshell, you can describe the plot as being part of human society on the ground, elevation above it, and the tragedy of solitude that ultimately makes us draw conclusions.

- And what about the inside rooms of the bunker - are they different in any way? Does each of them become a part of the plot in its own right?

Esbergen Sabitov:
- Yes, the bunker is divided into three rooms. The first one is like an anteroom; it has windows in it - i.e a connection to the outside world - and is situated the closest of all three to the ground level. Then you can get two levels down to find yourself in a dead end. The second room is more like a corridor where you can sit down and make a stop; this is like a transition room. The last space is a closed one, and it is, like I said, a dead end. Together they seem to be like some bio-form - on the one hand, they are independent but, on the other hand, they are continuations of one another.

- If the tower of "Home for Shakespeare" is rather about an idea than about a function, can we say that same about the tower for "Arkhstoyanie"?

Esbergen Sabitov:
- No, the tower that we built for Nikola-Lenivets has quite a specific function. It can become a sightseeing platform because on that side of the territory there are a lot of great views that one cannot see now. On the other side of the river, there is a great place of Nikolino Ukho, and this side of the river, there is virtually nothing to see - which is a pity - because these parts are also very picturesque. The tower can also become an extra link on the axis of our bridge between the Meander Valley and the Polissky Stool. All the more so because the Versailles Field is already highly developed, it's got many projects on it, and Meander is only just beginning to get filled up.

Of course, we will take the seasonal factor into consideration but I think that the idea of a tower is more than relevant to this place, so we will by all means try to implement it.

- What will be the further destiny of "Home for Shakespeare". Will they organize an exhibition based on the results of the contest?

Esbergen Sabitov:
- Unfortunately, I don't know anything about it. This contest was by default free and organized on a voluntary basis, without any prizes or registration charges. But I do have plans for further cooperation with the organizers. I don't do this to win any prizes but to get interesting contacts.

My victory in that contest gave me an incentive to move on with my creative activities because, apart from designing, I also write poetry. While the Nikola-Lenivets Bridge was in construction, I realized that I wanted to write about it during different seasons of the year. Also, this autumn I plan to have my personal exhibition at "Artplay" Center. I will showcase there my urbanist landscapes of the territory of Artplay itself and the former factory building that it occupies. They are drawn on unfolded cardboard boxes, on a gray background, and remind sketches of theater props. I also wrote poetry to accompany them. This way, I will again address the subject of theater in architecture, one that has already been explored in the project for "Home for Shakespeare" contest.

- The organizers of "Home for Shakespeare" contest are planning to organize more such contests of ideas that can be associated with the worlds of other writers and poets. Do you plan to take part in them?

Esbergen Sabitov:
– Yes, I even get invitations, for example, to take part in "Home for Marina Tsvetaeva" contest. I think that we can even showcase our bridge in Nikola-Lenivets as an example of connection between the creativity and reality. But we will still have to figure out how to do it better.

22 August 2016

Interviewed by:

Translated by:
Anton Mizonov

Headlines now

Object

A Unique Representative

The recently concluded year 2024 can be considered the year of completion for the “Garden Quarters” residential complex in Moscow’s Khamovniki. This project is well-known and, in many ways, iconic. Rarely does one manage to preserve such a number of original ideas, achieving in the end a kind of urban planning Gesamtkunstwerk. Here is a subjective view from an architecture journalist, with an interview with Sergey Skuratov soon to follow.

Object

Field of Life

The new project by the architectural company PNKB (an acronym for “Design, Research, and Advisory Bureau”), led by Sergey Gnedovsky and Anton Lyubimkin, for the Kulikovo Field Museum is dedicated to the field as a concept in its own right. The field has long been a focus of the museum’s thorough and successful research. Accordingly, the exterior of the new museum building is gentler than that of its predecessor, which was also designed by PNKB and dedicated specifically to the historic battle. Inside, however, the building confidently guides the visitor from a luminous atrium along a spiral path to the field – interpreted here as a field of life.

Object

A Paper Clip above the River

In this article, we talk with Vitaly Lutz from the Genplan Institute of Moscow about the design and unique features of the pedestrian bridge that now links the two banks of the Yauza River in the new cluster of Bauman Moscow State Technical University (MSTU). The bridge’s form and functionality – particularly the inclusion of an amphitheater suspended over the river – were conceived during the planning phase of the territory’s development. Typically, this approach is not standard practice, but the architects advocate for it, referring to this intermediate project phase as the “pre-AGR” stage (AGR stands for Architectural and Urban Planning Approval). Such a practice, they argue, helps define key parameters of future projects and bridge the gap between urban planning and architectural design.

Review

Living in the Architecture of One’s Own Making

Do architects design houses for themselves? You bet! In this article, we are examining a new book by TATLIN publishing house. This book – unprecedented for Russia – features 52 private homes designed and built by contemporary architects for themselves. It includes houses that are famous, even iconic, as well as lesser-known ones; large and small, stylish and eccentric. To some extent, the book reflects the history of Russian architecture over the past 30 years.

Object

A City Block Isoline

Another competition project for a residential complex on the banks of the Volga in Nizhny Novgorod has been prepared by Studio 44. A team of architects led by Ivan Kozhin concluded that using a regular block layout in such a location would be inappropriate and developed a “custom design” approach: a chain of parceled multi-section buildings stretching along the entire embankment. Let’s explore the features and advantages of this unconventional method.

Report

Competition: The Price of Creativity?

Any day now, we’re expecting the results of a competition held by the “Samolet” development group for a plot in Kommunarka. In the meantime, we share the impressions of Editor-in-Chief Julia Tarabarina, who managed to conduct a public talk. Though technically focused on the interaction between developers and architects, the public talk turned into a discussion about the pros and cons of architectural competitions.

Object

Terraced Design

The “River Park” residential complex has confidently and securely shaped the Nagatinsky Backwater shoreline. Featuring a public embankment, elevated courtyards connected by pedestrian bridges, and brick façades, the development invites exploration of its nuanced response to the surrounding context, as well as hints of the architects’ megalithic design thinking.

A Kremlin’s Core and Meteorite Fragments

We continue our coverage of the competition projects for the residential district that the development company GloraX plans to build along the embankment of the Rowing Channel in Nizhny Novgorod. ASADOV Architects approached the concept through a deep dive into local identity, using storytelling to pinpoint a central idea for the design: the master plan and composition are imagined as if a meteorite had struck a “proto-Kremlin”. Sounds weird? Find more details below!

Contest Results

The Volga Regatta

GloraX plans to develop a residential complex spanning 14 hectares along the Volga River in Nizhny Novgorod. The winning design in a closed-door competition, created by GORA Architects, features housing typologies ranging from townhouses to terraced high-rise slabs, a balance of functions, diverse ways of engaging with the water, and even a dedicated island (no less!) for the city residents.

Object

Life Plans

The master plan for the residential district “Prityazheniye” (“Gravity”) in Naberezhnye Chelny was developed by the architectural company A.Len, taking into account the specific urban planning context and partially implemented solutions of the first phase. However, the master plan prioritized its own values: a green framework, a system of focal points, a hierarchy of spaces, and pedestrian priority. After this, the question of what residents will do in their neighborhood simply doesn’t arise.

Object

A New Track

We took a thorough look at D_Station, a railcar repair depot dating back to 1906, recently reconstructed while preserving its century-old industrial structure, upon the project by Sergey Trukhanov and T+T Architects. Though work on the interiors – set to house restaurants and public spaces – is still underway, the building’s exterior already offers plenty to see. Visitors can explore the blend of old and new brickwork, appreciate the architect’s unique interpretation of ruin aesthetics, and enjoy the newly built pedestrian route that connects the Citydel Business Center’s arches to Kazakova Street.

Report

Four Different Surveys

The “Explore the City” competition, organized this year by the Genplan Institute of Moscow, stands out as a pretty unconventional one for the architectural field but aligns perfectly well with the character of urban planning work. The winning project analyzed contemporary residential complexes, combining urban planning insights with a realtor’s perspective to propose a hybrid approach. Other entries explored public centers, motivations for car ownership, and housing vacancy rates. A fifth participant withdrew. Here’s a closer look at the four completed works.

Report

Scheduled Evolution

ASADOV Architects unveiled the EvyCenter pavilion, a microcultural hub for fostering personal growth, organizing workshops, and doing gymnastics. Additionally, this pavilion serves as a prototype for a scalable country house, drawing inspiration from the “Loskutok” project, and constructed from CLT panels in a factory. This marks the beginning of a developer project initiated by the architectural firm (sic!), which is seeking partners to expand both small Evy settlements and even larger Evy cities, which are, according to Andrey Asadov, aimed at fostering the “evolutionary” development of the people who will inhabit them.

Object

The Golden Crown

The concept for a dental clinic in Yekaterinburg, developed by CNTR Studio, revolves around the idea of a “mouth full of gold”: pristine white porcelain stoneware walls are complemented by matte brass details. To avoid an overly literal interpretation, the architects focused on the building’s proportions, skillfully navigating between sunlight requirements and fire safety regulations.

News

Flexibility and Integration

Not long ago, we covered the project for the fourth phase of the ÁLIA residential complex, designed by APEX. Now, we’ve been shown different fence concepts they developed to enclose the complex’s private courtyards, incorporating a variety of public functions. We believe that the sheer fact that the complex’s architects were involved in such a detail as fencing speaks volumes.

Object

A Step Forward

The HIDE residential complex represents a major milestone for ADM architects and their leaders Andrey Romanov and Ekaterina Kuznetsova in their quest for a fresh high-rise aesthetic – one that is flexible and layered, capable of bringing vibrancy to mass and silhouette while shaping form. Over recent years, this approach has become ADM’s “signature style”, with the golden HIDE tower playing a pivotal role in its evolution. Here, we delve into the project’s story, explore the details of the complex’s design, and uncover its core essence.

Object

Gold in the Sands

A new office for a transcontinental company specializing in resource extraction and processing has opened in Dubai. Designed by T+T Architects, masters of creating spaces that are contemporary, diverse, flexible, and original, this project exemplifies their expertise. On the executive floor, a massive brass-clad partition dominates, while layered textures of compressed earth create a contextually resonant backdrop.

Object

Layers and Levels of Flight

This project goes way back – Reserve Union won this architectural competition at the end of 2011, and the building was completed in 2018, so it’s practically “archival”. However, despite being relatively unknown, the building can hardly be considered “dated” and remains a prime example of architectural expression, particularly in the headquarters genre. And it’s especially fitting for an aviation company office. In some ways, it resembles the Aeroflot headquarters at Sheremetyevo but with its own unique identity, following the signature style of Vladimir Plotkin. In this article, we take an in-depth look at the United Aircraft Corporation (UAC) headquarters in the Moscow agglomeration town of Zhukovsky, supplemented by recent photographs from Alexey Naroditsky – a shoot that became only recently possible due to the fact that improvements were finally made in the surrounding area.

Object

Light and Shadow

In this article, we delve into the architectural design of the “Chaika” house by DNK ag architects, which was recently completed in 2023 as part of the collection of signature designs at ZILArt. As is well-known, all the buildings in this complex follow a design code, yet each one is distinct. This particular building stands out not only for its whiteness and minimalism but also for the refined use of a limited number of techniques that, together, create what can confidently be called synergy.

View

Casus Novae

A master plan was developed for a large residential area with a name of “DNS City”, but now that its implementation began, the plan has been arbitrarily reformatted and replaced with something that, while similar on the surface, is actually quite different. This is not the first time such a thing happens, but it’s always frustrating. With permission from the author, we are sharing Maria Elkina’s post.

Report

Treasure Hunting

The GAFA bureau, in collaboration with Tegola and Arkhitail, organized an expedition to the island of Kilpola in Karelia as part of Moskomarkhitektura’s “Open City” festival. There, amidst moss and rocks, the students sought answers to questions like: what is the sacred, where does it dwell, and what sustains it? Assisting the participants in this quest were landscape engineer Evgeny Levin, artist Nicholas Roerich, a moose, and the lack of cellular connection. Here’s how the story unfolded.

Object

Depths of the Earth, Streams of Water

In the Malaya Okhta district, the Akzent building, designed by Stepan Liphart, was constructed. It follows a classic tripartite structure, yet it’s what you might call “hand-drawn”: each façade is unique in its form and details, some of which aren’t immediately noticeable. In this article, we explore the context and, together with the architect, delve into how the form was developed.

Object

Fir Tree Dynamics

The “Airports of Region” holding is planning to build an airport in Karachay-Cherkessia, aiming to make the Arkhyz and Dombay resorts more accessible to travelers. The project that won in an invitation-only competition, submitted by Sergey Nikeshkin’s KPLN, blends natural imagery inspired by the shape of a conifer seed, open-air waiting spaces, majestic large trees, and a green roof elevated on needle-like columns. The result is both nature-inspired and WOW.

Object

A Brick Shell

In the process of designing a clubhouse situated among pine trees in a prestigious suburban area near Moscow, the architectural firm “A.Len” did the façade design part. The combination of different types of brick and masonry correlates with the volumetric and plastique solutions, further enhanced by the inclusion of wood-painted fragments and metal “glazing”.

Report

Word Forms

ATRIUM architects love ambitious challenges, and for the firm’s thirtieth anniversary, they boldly play a game of words with an exhibition that dives deep into a self-created vocabulary. They immerse their projects – especially art installations – into this glossary, as if plunging into a current of their own. You feel as if you’re flowing through the veins of pure art, immersed in a universe of vertical cities, educational spaces – of which the architects are true masters – and the cultural codes of various locations. But what truly captivates is the bold statement that Vera Butko and Anton Nadtochy make, both through their work and this exhibition: architecture, above all, is art – the art of working with form and space.

Object

Flexibility and Acuteness of Modernity

Luxurious, fluid, large “kokoshniks” and spiral barrel columns, as if made from colorful chewing gum: there seem to be no other mansion like this in Moscow, designed in the “Neo-Russian-Modern” style. And the “Teremok” on Malaya Kaluzhskaya, previously somewhat obscure, has “come alive with new colors” and gained visibility after its restoration for the office of the “architectural ecosystem” as the architects love to call themselves. It’s evident that Julius Borisov and the architects at UNK put their hearts into finding this new office and bringing it up to date. Let’s delve into the paradoxes of this mansion’s history and its plasticity. Spoiler: two versions of modernity meet here, both balancing on the razor’s edge of “what’s current”.

Interview

Yuri Vissarionov: “A modular house does not belong to the land”

It belongs to space, or to the air... It turns out that 3D printing is more effective when combined with a modular approach: the house is built in a workshop and then adapted to the site, including on uneven terrain. Yuri Vissarionov shares his latest experience in designing tourist complexes, both in central Russia and in the south. These include houseboats, homes printed from lightweight concrete using a 3D printer, and, of course, frame houses.

Object

Moscow’s First

“The quality of education largely depends on the quality of the educational environment”. This principle of the last decade has been realized by Sergey Skuratov in the project for the First Moscow Gymnasium on Rostovskaya Embankment in the Khamovniki district. The building seamlessly integrates into the complex urban landscape, responding both to the pedestrian flow of the city and the quiet alleyways. It skillfully takes advantage of the height differences and aligns with modern trends in educational space design. Let’s take a closer look.

Object

Looking at the Water

The site of Villa Sonata stretches from the road to the water’s edge, offering its own shoreline, pier, and a picturesque river panorama. To reveal these sweeping views, Roman Leonidov “cut” the façade diagonally parallel to the river, thus getting two main axes for the house and, consequently, “two heads”. The internal core – two double-height spaces, a living room and a conservatory, with a “bridge” above them – makes the house both “transparent” and filled with light.

Object

The White Wing

Well, it’s not exactly white. It’s more of a beige, white-stone structure that plays with the color of limestone – smoother surfaces are lighter, while rougher ones are darker. This wing unites various elements: it absorbs and interprets the surrounding themes. It responds to everything, yet maintains a cohesive expression – a challenging task! – while also incorporating recognizable features of its own, such as the dynamic cuts at the bottom, top, and middle.