По-русски

​Sokolniki Park: Nature's Embassy in the Megalopolis

The contest for the best development concept for Sokolniki Park was won by the consortium of the British company Groundlab, Moscow’s Wowhaus, and Saint Petersburg institute of urban planning "Urbanica".

18 September 2014
Contest Results
mainImg
First place. "Nature's Embassy" Project. Authors: Groundlab (Netherlands), Wowhaus (Russia), Institute of urban planning "Urbanica" (Russia).



The international contest started on May 19 and consisted of two stages: the willingness to participate in it was expressed by 79 teams from different parts of the world but only ten consortiums from six countries were selected by the judging panel to pass into the second stage. Then, in the course of two months, these teams developed their proposals on the reconstruction of the park, and on the 16th of September, one day before the announcement of the results, the judging panel, presided by the head of Moscow Culture Department Sergey Kapkov, decided who the winner of the contest would be. This proved to be a tough call: as deputy chairman of the judging panel Marina Lulchuk notes, "each [of the second stage contestants - editor's note] deserved to win the first place and the winner was only identified by the point total". The session continued for more than six hours: the judging panel did not seem to be able to come to the final decision, and it was only the voting by points that helped the members to find the ultimate leader: the concept by Groundlab and Wowhaus that will determine the strategy of the park's development for the next 15 years.

Announcing the name of the contest winner, Sergey Kapkov noted that what the judging panel particularly liked about this project was not only the architectural and "ideological" part but also the sturdy and well thought-out economic model of developing the park by attracting the finances from outside the city budget. Thus the economy of the project became one of the most important criteria of evaluation. Apart from this, close attention was given to the sustainability of all the concepts and the probability of their actual implementation - because the main condition of the contest was keeping the environmental balance.

Sokolniki is one of Moscow's largest parks. It includes more than 500 hectares of green territory, 200 out of which are a natural zone of special protection. At the same time, most of the land (some 300 hectares), separated from the central area by a motorway, remains practically unused by the people. In this connection, the contestants were required to find a solution that would unite these two parts into a single natural complex. Andrew Lapshin, director of Sokolniki, noted that all the prize-winning projects address this issue to some degree - and this also became the decisive factor in choosing the winner. 

The second prize was given to SokoLab project that was presented by the French-Russian consortium headed by Debarre Duplantiers Associes (France). The third place was shared by two projects. According to the point rating, the third place was taken by the project entitled "Vremya Chaya" ("Tea Time" - translator's note) prepared by the consortium headed by Turenscape Architects of China. However, the management of the park also very much liked the project entitled "Sokolniki Park: Legacy Evolution" that was developed by Netherlands' LOLA landscape architects in cooperation with the professionals from Columbia, Russia, and Belgium. Apart from that, a special mention was given to yet another concept presented by the Dutch team MLA+B.V., in which the history of the park gracefully intertwines with the contemporary content. 

Hereby, we are presenting the prize-winning projects: 

First place. "Nature's Embassy".
Authors: Groundlab (Nethelands), Wowhaus (Russia), Institute of Urban Planning "Urbanica" (Russia). 


Oleg Shapiro, one of the authors of the winning project. Photo by Alla Pavlikova


First place. "Nature's Embassy" Project. Authors: Groundlab (Netherlands), Wowhaus (Russia), Institute of urban planning "Urbanica" (Russia).

Oleg Shapiro, leader of Wowhaus:
"Sokolniki is one of Moscow's largest park areas, whose territory is also connected to the Losiny Island. Considering the sheer magnitude of this green territory, we proposed to call our project "Nature's Embassy in Moscow". The main theme of the project became the communication of man and nature on the most various levels: from surveying the wild animals to planting trees and taking care of them. 


First place. "Nature's Embassy" Project. Authors: Groundlab (Netherlands), Wowhaus (Russia), Institute of urban planning "Urbanica" (Russia).

According to our concept, the natural corridor of the Losiny Island will be continued as far as the center of Sokolniki. This huge portion of the park will become a sanctuary totally outside the picture of urban development of the city. From the structural standpoint, the body of the park can be divided into three types of land use. The first one is precisely the belt that connects the Losiny Island to the park. In view of its primeval character, this belt was named "forest" in the project. The second layer is the park land which surrounds the "forest" and which is more accessible for the people. And, finally, the third part is the regular park, located at the entrance to Sokolniki, one that will gather all the entertainment and sport functions.


First place. "Nature's Embassy" Project. Authors: Groundlab (Netherlands), Wowhaus (Russia), Institute of urban planning "Urbanica" (Russia).


First place. "Nature's Embassy" Project. Authors: Groundlab (Netherlands), Wowhaus (Russia), Institute of urban planning "Urbanica" (Russia).


First place. "Nature's Embassy" Project. Authors: Groundlab (Netherlands), Wowhaus (Russia), Institute of urban planning "Urbanica" (Russia).

It was decided that the historical segmental structure of the park would be kept intact but at the same time each clearing will get a function of its own and will be decorated by its own particular plants. The driving map will also be significantly changed. The priority will be given to pedestrians but it will still be impossible to delete the car traffic off the traverse clearing altogether: it is planned that the auto and pedestrian flows will be spaced apart, special consideration given to the dedicated pathways for the animals between Sokolniki and the Losiny Island. 


First place. "Nature's Embassy" Project. Authors: Groundlab (Netherlands), Wowhaus (Russia), Institute of urban planning "Urbanica" (Russia).


First place. "Nature's Embassy" Project. Authors: Groundlab (Netherlands), Wowhaus (Russia), Institute of urban planning "Urbanica" (Russia).


First place. "Nature's Embassy" Project. Authors: Groundlab (Netherlands), Wowhaus (Russia), Institute of urban planning "Urbanica" (Russia).


First place. "Nature's Embassy" Project. Authors: Groundlab (Netherlands), Wowhaus (Russia), Institute of urban planning "Urbanica" (Russia).

Special attention is given to the economic concept of the park's development, according to which particular emphasis will be laid on the work of the expo center and the sport facilities". 


First place. "Nature's Embassy" Project. Authors: Groundlab (Netherlands), Wowhaus (Russia), Institute of urban planning "Urbanica" (Russia).


First place. "Nature's Embassy" Project. Authors: Groundlab (Netherlands), Wowhaus (Russia), Institute of urban planning "Urbanica" (Russia).


First place. "Nature's Embassy" Project. Authors: Groundlab (Netherlands), Wowhaus (Russia), Institute of urban planning "Urbanica" (Russia).

The judging panel especially noted the sustainability of the project coupled with the care for the history of Sokolniki, as well as the conformity of the project to the park's history. 

Second place. SokoLab
Authors: Debarre Duplantiers Associes (France), Ingerop (France), "Prostor" (Russia), Fetish Film (Russia), RDNK (Russia).

Second place. SokoLab Project. Authors: Debarre Duplantiers Associes, Ingerop (France), "Prostor" (Russia), Fetish Film (Russia), RDNK (Russia)


What the judging panel liked about this project was the detailed elaboration and the careful study of the peculiarities of the park. 


Second place. SokoLab Project. Authors: Debarre Duplantiers Associes, Ingerop (France), "Prostor" (Russia), Fetish Film (Russia), RDNK (Russia)


Second place. SokoLab Project. Authors: Debarre Duplantiers Associes, Ingerop (France), "Prostor" (Russia), Fetish Film (Russia), RDNK (Russia)


Second place. SokoLab Project. Authors: Debarre Duplantiers Associes, Ingerop (France), "Prostor" (Russia), Fetish Film (Russia), RDNK (Russia)


Second place. SokoLab Project. Authors: Debarre Duplantiers Associes, Ingerop (France), "Prostor" (Russia), Fetish Film (Russia), RDNK (Russia)


Second place. SokoLab Project. Authors: Debarre Duplantiers Associes, Ingerop (France), "Prostor" (Russia), Fetish Film (Russia), RDNK (Russia)


Second place. SokoLab Project. Authors: Debarre Duplantiers Associes, Ingerop (France), "Prostor" (Russia), Fetish Film (Russia), RDNK (Russia)


Second place. SokoLab Project. Authors: Debarre Duplantiers Associes, Ingerop (France), "Prostor" (Russia), Fetish Film (Russia), RDNK (Russia)


Second place. SokoLab Project. Authors: Debarre Duplantiers Associes, Ingerop (France), "Prostor" (Russia), Fetish Film (Russia), RDNK (Russia)


Second place. SokoLab Project. Authors: Debarre Duplantiers Associes, Ingerop (France), "Prostor" (Russia), Fetish Film (Russia), RDNK (Russia)

Third place. "Sokolniki Park: Evolution Legacy". 
Authors: Lola Landscape architects (Netherlands), Architectural group a3OH (Russia), Taller 301 (Columbia), Land + Civilization Compositions (Netherlands), Symboisis Grontmij Belgium NV (Belgium), Studio Transformer (Russia), Polyester.

Third place. "Sokolniki Park: Legacy Evolution". Authors: Lola Landscape architects (Netherlands), Architectural group ЗОН (Russia), Taller 301 (Columbia), Land + Civilization Compositions (Netherlands), Symboisis Grontmij Belgium NV (Belgium), Studio Transformer (Russia), Polyester


The judging panel gave special mention to the gracefulness and simplicity of the proposals and their possible implementation. For example, in one of the clearings the authors proposed to create a promenade surrounded by the palm trees and on the spot of today's greenhouses - make a huge lawn. 


Third place. "Sokolniki Park: Legacy Evolution". Authors: Lola Landscape architects (Netherlands), Architectural group ЗОН (Russia), Taller 301 (Columbia), Land + Civilization Compositions (Netherlands), Symboisis Grontmij Belgium NV (Belgium), Studio Transformer (Russia), Polyester


Third place. "Sokolniki Park: Legacy Evolution". Authors: Lola Landscape architects (Netherlands), Architectural group ЗОН (Russia), Taller 301 (Columbia), Land + Civilization Compositions (Netherlands), Symboisis Grontmij Belgium NV (Belgium), Studio Transformer (Russia), Polyester


Third place. "Sokolniki Park: Legacy Evolution". Authors: Lola Landscape architects (Netherlands), Architectural group ЗОН (Russia), Taller 301 (Columbia), Land + Civilization Compositions (Netherlands), Symboisis Grontmij Belgium NV (Belgium), Studio Transformer (Russia), Polyester


Third place. "Sokolniki Park: Legacy Evolution". Authors: Lola Landscape architects (Netherlands), Architectural group ЗОН (Russia), Taller 301 (Columbia), Land + Civilization Compositions (Netherlands), Symboisis Grontmij Belgium NV (Belgium), Studio Transformer (Russia), Polyester


Third place. "Sokolniki Park: Legacy Evolution". Authors: Lola Landscape architects (Netherlands), Architectural group ЗОН (Russia), Taller 301 (Columbia), Land + Civilization Compositions (Netherlands), Symboisis Grontmij Belgium NV (Belgium), Studio Transformer (Russia), Polyester


Third place. "Sokolniki Park: Legacy Evolution". Authors: Lola Landscape architects (Netherlands), Architectural group ЗОН (Russia), Taller 301 (Columbia), Land + Civilization Compositions (Netherlands), Symboisis Grontmij Belgium NV (Belgium), Studio Transformer (Russia), Polyester


Third place. "Sokolniki Park: Legacy Evolution". Authors: Lola Landscape architects (Netherlands), Architectural group ЗОН (Russia), Taller 301 (Columbia), Land + Civilization Compositions (Netherlands), Symboisis Grontmij Belgium NV (Belgium), Studio Transformer (Russia), Polyester


Third place. "Sokolniki Park: Legacy Evolution". Authors: Lola Landscape architects (Netherlands), Architectural group ЗОН (Russia), Taller 301 (Columbia), Land + Civilization Compositions (Netherlands), Symboisis Grontmij Belgium NV (Belgium), Studio Transformer (Russia), Polyester


Third place. "Sokolniki Park: Legacy Evolution". Authors: Lola Landscape architects (Netherlands), Architectural group ЗОН (Russia), Taller 301 (Columbia), Land + Civilization Compositions (Netherlands), Symboisis Grontmij Belgium NV (Belgium), Studio Transformer (Russia), Polyester

Third place. "Vremya Chaya" ("Tea Time")


Third place. "Vremya Chaya" ("Tea Time") Project. Authors: Turenscape (China), Strelka (Russia), MIX Design Studio, AECOM LLC (Russia)

Authors: Turenscape (China), Strelka (Russia), MIX Design Studio, AECOM LLC (Russia)
The authors went as far as coming up with a new conceptual name - "Park-Samovar" (an urn with a spigot at its base used in Russia to boil water for tea. - translator's note). The project is predominantly based on the Russian tradition of tea parties. All the park territory is filled with various thematic spots where the visitors can make a stop and have a cup of tea. 


Third place. "Vremya Chaya" ("Tea Time") Project. Authors: Turenscape (China), Strelka (Russia), MIX Design Studio, AECOM LLC (Russia)


Third place. "Vremya Chaya" ("Tea Time") Project. Authors: Turenscape (China), Strelka (Russia), MIX Design Studio, AECOM LLC (Russia)


Third place. "Vremya Chaya" ("Tea Time") Project. Authors: Turenscape (China), Strelka (Russia), MIX Design Studio, AECOM LLC (Russia)


Third place. "Vremya Chaya" ("Tea Time") Project. Authors: Turenscape (China), Strelka (Russia), MIX Design Studio, AECOM LLC (Russia)


Third place. "Vremya Chaya" ("Tea Time") Project. Authors: Turenscape (China), Strelka (Russia), MIX Design Studio, AECOM LLC (Russia)


Third place. "Vremya Chaya" ("Tea Time") Project. Authors: Turenscape (China), Strelka (Russia), MIX Design Studio, AECOM LLC (Russia)


Third place. "Vremya Chaya" ("Tea Time") Project. Authors: Turenscape (China), Strelka (Russia), MIX Design Studio, AECOM LLC (Russia)


Third place. "Vremya Chaya" ("Tea Time") Project. Authors: Turenscape (China), Strelka (Russia), MIX Design Studio, AECOM LLC (Russia)


Third place. "Vremya Chaya" ("Tea Time") Project. Authors: Turenscape (China), Strelka (Russia), MIX Design Studio, AECOM LLC (Russia)
***
Based on the results of the contest, Sokolniki Park will for three months present an exhibition of all the finalists' projects. According to Andrew Lapshin, the most interesting of ideas proposed by the prize winners will still be used in the implementation of the park reconstruction project, while their authors will be invited to take part in the project in their dedicated work areas. Sergey Kapkov also noted that the solutions proposed by the contest participants will surely be employed by the city because presently there will be implemented the mayor-approved program of improving Moscow's park territories: today, more than a hundred park territories have been handed over to the Culture Department that has the task of reconstructing them before 2017. 

The judging panel:
Chairman - Sergey Kapkov, minister of the Moscow government, chief of Moscow Culture Department;
Deputy chairman of the judging panel - Marina Lulchuk, director of "Mosgorpark United Management";
Deputy chairman of the judging panel - Olga Gritsan, chief of the department for development of the park territories of "Mosgorpark United Management";
Julia Kudryashova, deputy head of Moscow Department of Land Use and Conservation;
Digby Whyte, the main executive director of the International Federation of Park and Recreation; 
Eugene Ace, president of the architectural school "MARCH";
Taisia Wolftrub, president of the association of landscape architects of Russia, chief landscape architect of "EMPIRE" architectural bureau;
Elena Gonzales, architectural reviewer, curator of "ArchMoscow" exhibition; 
Elena Solovieva, head of the scientific and project association "Regulation of town-planning activities on the historical territories and protected areas of cultural legacy monuments" of Research and Development Institute of the General Plan of Moscow;
Gabriele Filippini, architect, professor, leader of Studio Arch Gabriele Filippini;
Guillermo Penalosa, expert in the field of the development of city parks, increasing the mobility, and attaching the city people to the transformation of the city environment, executive director of "8-80 Cities" (Canada);
Muriel Russo-Ovchinnikov, the founder and creative director of "Lieu Commun" agency;
Eugenia Galetka, the managing partner and General director of "Journey" event-agency;
Julia Shakhnovskaya, director of the Polytechnic Museum;
Natalia Danilina, director of the ecology education center "Sanctuaries";
Natalia Matveeva, the curator of the department of the gardening monuments under the Agency for preservation of special cultural legacy objects of the Department of Cultural Legacy of Moscow.
First place. "Nature's Embassy" Project. Authors: Groundlab (Netherlands), Wowhaus (Russia), Institute of urban planning "Urbanica" (Russia).
Oleg Shapiro, one of the authors of the winning project. Photo by Alla Pavlikova
First place. "Nature's Embassy" Project. Authors: Groundlab (Netherlands), Wowhaus (Russia), Institute of urban planning "Urbanica" (Russia).
First place. "Nature's Embassy" Project. Authors: Groundlab (Netherlands), Wowhaus (Russia), Institute of urban planning "Urbanica" (Russia).
First place. "Nature's Embassy" Project. Authors: Groundlab (Netherlands), Wowhaus (Russia), Institute of urban planning "Urbanica" (Russia).
First place. "Nature's Embassy" Project. Authors: Groundlab (Netherlands), Wowhaus (Russia), Institute of urban planning "Urbanica" (Russia).
First place. "Nature's Embassy" Project. Authors: Groundlab (Netherlands), Wowhaus (Russia), Institute of urban planning "Urbanica" (Russia).
First place. "Nature's Embassy" Project. Authors: Groundlab (Netherlands), Wowhaus (Russia), Institute of urban planning "Urbanica" (Russia).
First place. "Nature's Embassy" Project. Authors: Groundlab (Netherlands), Wowhaus (Russia), Institute of urban planning "Urbanica" (Russia).
First place. "Nature's Embassy" Project. Authors: Groundlab (Netherlands), Wowhaus (Russia), Institute of urban planning "Urbanica" (Russia).
First place. "Nature's Embassy" Project. Authors: Groundlab (Netherlands), Wowhaus (Russia), Institute of urban planning "Urbanica" (Russia).
First place. "Nature's Embassy" Project. Authors: Groundlab (Netherlands), Wowhaus (Russia), Institute of urban planning "Urbanica" (Russia).
First place. "Nature's Embassy" Project. Authors: Groundlab (Netherlands), Wowhaus (Russia), Institute of urban planning "Urbanica" (Russia).
First place. "Nature's Embassy" Project. Authors: Groundlab (Netherlands), Wowhaus (Russia), Institute of urban planning "Urbanica" (Russia).
Second place. SokoLab Project. Authors: Debarre Duplantiers Associes, Ingerop (France), "Prostor" (Russia), Fetish Film (Russia), RDNK (Russia)
Second place. SokoLab Project. Authors: Debarre Duplantiers Associes, Ingerop (France), "Prostor" (Russia), Fetish Film (Russia), RDNK (Russia)
Second place. SokoLab Project. Authors: Debarre Duplantiers Associes, Ingerop (France), "Prostor" (Russia), Fetish Film (Russia), RDNK (Russia)
Second place. SokoLab Project. Authors: Debarre Duplantiers Associes, Ingerop (France), "Prostor" (Russia), Fetish Film (Russia), RDNK (Russia)
Second place. SokoLab Project. Authors: Debarre Duplantiers Associes, Ingerop (France), "Prostor" (Russia), Fetish Film (Russia), RDNK (Russia)
Second place. SokoLab Project. Authors: Debarre Duplantiers Associes, Ingerop (France), "Prostor" (Russia), Fetish Film (Russia), RDNK (Russia)
Second place. SokoLab Project. Authors: Debarre Duplantiers Associes, Ingerop (France), "Prostor" (Russia), Fetish Film (Russia), RDNK (Russia)
Second place. SokoLab Project. Authors: Debarre Duplantiers Associes, Ingerop (France), "Prostor" (Russia), Fetish Film (Russia), RDNK (Russia)
Second place. SokoLab Project. Authors: Debarre Duplantiers Associes, Ingerop (France), "Prostor" (Russia), Fetish Film (Russia), RDNK (Russia)
Second place. SokoLab Project. Authors: Debarre Duplantiers Associes, Ingerop (France), "Prostor" (Russia), Fetish Film (Russia), RDNK (Russia)
Third place. "Sokolniki Park: Legacy Evolution". Authors: Lola Landscape architects (Netherlands), Architectural group ЗОН (Russia), Taller 301 (Columbia), Land + Civilization Compositions (Netherlands), Symboisis Grontmij Belgium NV (Belgium), Studio Tra
Third place. "Sokolniki Park: Legacy Evolution". Authors: Lola Landscape architects (Netherlands), Architectural group ЗОН (Russia), Taller 301 (Columbia), Land + Civilization Compositions (Netherlands), Symboisis Grontmij Belgium NV (Belgium), Studio Tra
Third place. "Sokolniki Park: Legacy Evolution". Authors: Lola Landscape architects (Netherlands), Architectural group ЗОН (Russia), Taller 301 (Columbia), Land + Civilization Compositions (Netherlands), Symboisis Grontmij Belgium NV (Belgium), Studio Tra
Third place. "Sokolniki Park: Legacy Evolution". Authors: Lola Landscape architects (Netherlands), Architectural group ЗОН (Russia), Taller 301 (Columbia), Land + Civilization Compositions (Netherlands), Symboisis Grontmij Belgium NV (Belgium), Studio Tra
Third place. "Sokolniki Park: Legacy Evolution". Authors: Lola Landscape architects (Netherlands), Architectural group ЗОН (Russia), Taller 301 (Columbia), Land + Civilization Compositions (Netherlands), Symboisis Grontmij Belgium NV (Belgium), Studio Tra
Third place. "Sokolniki Park: Legacy Evolution". Authors: Lola Landscape architects (Netherlands), Architectural group ЗОН (Russia), Taller 301 (Columbia), Land + Civilization Compositions (Netherlands), Symboisis Grontmij Belgium NV (Belgium), Studio Tra
Third place. "Sokolniki Park: Legacy Evolution". Authors: Lola Landscape architects (Netherlands), Architectural group ЗОН (Russia), Taller 301 (Columbia), Land + Civilization Compositions (Netherlands), Symboisis Grontmij Belgium NV (Belgium), Studio Tra
Third place. "Sokolniki Park: Legacy Evolution". Authors: Lola Landscape architects (Netherlands), Architectural group ЗОН (Russia), Taller 301 (Columbia), Land + Civilization Compositions (Netherlands), Symboisis Grontmij Belgium NV (Belgium), Studio Tra
Third place. "Sokolniki Park: Legacy Evolution". Authors: Lola Landscape architects (Netherlands), Architectural group ЗОН (Russia), Taller 301 (Columbia), Land + Civilization Compositions (Netherlands), Symboisis Grontmij Belgium NV (Belgium), Studio Tra
Third place. "Sokolniki Park: Legacy Evolution". Authors: Lola Landscape architects (Netherlands), Architectural group ЗОН (Russia), Taller 301 (Columbia), Land + Civilization Compositions (Netherlands), Symboisis Grontmij Belgium NV (Belgium), Studio Tra
Third place. "Vremya Chaya" ("Tea Time") Project. Authors: Turenscape (China), Strelka (Russia), MIX Design Studio, AECOM LLC (Russia)
Third place. "Vremya Chaya" ("Tea Time") Project. Authors: Turenscape (China), Strelka (Russia), MIX Design Studio, AECOM LLC (Russia)
Third place. "Vremya Chaya" ("Tea Time") Project. Authors: Turenscape (China), Strelka (Russia), MIX Design Studio, AECOM LLC (Russia)
Third place. "Vremya Chaya" ("Tea Time") Project. Authors: Turenscape (China), Strelka (Russia), MIX Design Studio, AECOM LLC (Russia)
Third place. "Vremya Chaya" ("Tea Time") Project. Authors: Turenscape (China), Strelka (Russia), MIX Design Studio, AECOM LLC (Russia)
Third place. "Vremya Chaya" ("Tea Time") Project. Authors: Turenscape (China), Strelka (Russia), MIX Design Studio, AECOM LLC (Russia)
Third place. "Vremya Chaya" ("Tea Time") Project. Authors: Turenscape (China), Strelka (Russia), MIX Design Studio, AECOM LLC (Russia)
Third place. "Vremya Chaya" ("Tea Time") Project. Authors: Turenscape (China), Strelka (Russia), MIX Design Studio, AECOM LLC (Russia)
Third place. "Vremya Chaya" ("Tea Time") Project. Authors: Turenscape (China), Strelka (Russia), MIX Design Studio, AECOM LLC (Russia)
Third place. "Vremya Chaya" ("Tea Time") Project. Authors: Turenscape (China), Strelka (Russia), MIX Design Studio, AECOM LLC (Russia)


18 September 2014

Headlines now
The Golden Crown
The concept for a dental clinic in Yekaterinburg, developed by CNTR Studio, revolves around the idea of a “mouth full of gold”: pristine white porcelain stoneware walls are complemented by matte brass details. To avoid an overly literal interpretation, the architects focused on the building’s proportions, skillfully navigating between sunlight requirements and fire safety regulations.
Flexibility and Integration
Not long ago, we covered the project for the fourth phase of the ÁLIA residential complex, designed by APEX. Now, we’ve been shown different fence concepts they developed to enclose the complex’s private courtyards, incorporating a variety of public functions. We believe that the sheer fact that the complex’s architects were involved in such a detail as fencing speaks volumes.
A Step Forward
The HIDE residential complex represents a major milestone for ADM architects and their leaders Andrey Romanov and Ekaterina Kuznetsova in their quest for a fresh high-rise aesthetic – one that is flexible and layered, capable of bringing vibrancy to mass and silhouette while shaping form. Over recent years, this approach has become ADM’s “signature style”, with the golden HIDE tower playing a pivotal role in its evolution. Here, we delve into the project’s story, explore the details of the complex’s design, and uncover its core essence.
Gold in the Sands
A new office for a transcontinental company specializing in resource extraction and processing has opened in Dubai. Designed by T+T Architects, masters of creating spaces that are contemporary, diverse, flexible, and original, this project exemplifies their expertise. On the executive floor, a massive brass-clad partition dominates, while layered textures of compressed earth create a contextually resonant backdrop.
Layers and Levels of Flight
This project goes way back – Reserve Union won this architectural competition at the end of 2011, and the building was completed in 2018, so it’s practically “archival”. However, despite being relatively unknown, the building can hardly be considered “dated” and remains a prime example of architectural expression, particularly in the headquarters genre. And it’s especially fitting for an aviation company office. In some ways, it resembles the Aeroflot headquarters at Sheremetyevo but with its own unique identity, following the signature style of Vladimir Plotkin. In this article, we take an in-depth look at the United Aircraft Corporation (UAC) headquarters in the Moscow agglomeration town of Zhukovsky, supplemented by recent photographs from Alexey Naroditsky – a shoot that became only recently possible due to the fact that improvements were finally made in the surrounding area.
Light and Shadow
In this article, we delve into the architectural design of the “Chaika” house by DNK ag architects, which was recently completed in 2023 as part of the collection of signature designs at ZILArt. As is well-known, all the buildings in this complex follow a design code, yet each one is distinct. This particular building stands out not only for its whiteness and minimalism but also for the refined use of a limited number of techniques that, together, create what can confidently be called synergy.
Casus Novae
A master plan was developed for a large residential area with a name of “DNS City”, but now that its implementation began, the plan has been arbitrarily reformatted and replaced with something that, while similar on the surface, is actually quite different. This is not the first time such a thing happens, but it’s always frustrating. With permission from the author, we are sharing Maria Elkina’s post.
Treasure Hunting
The GAFA bureau, in collaboration with Tegola and Arkhitail, organized an expedition to the island of Kilpola in Karelia as part of Moskomarkhitektura’s “Open City” festival. There, amidst moss and rocks, the students sought answers to questions like: what is the sacred, where does it dwell, and what sustains it? Assisting the participants in this quest were landscape engineer Evgeny Levin, artist Nicholas Roerich, a moose, and the lack of cellular connection. Here’s how the story unfolded.
Depths of the Earth, Streams of Water
In the Malaya Okhta district, the Akzent building, designed by Stepan Liphart, was constructed. It follows a classic tripartite structure, yet it’s what you might call “hand-drawn”: each façade is unique in its form and details, some of which aren’t immediately noticeable. In this article, we explore the context and, together with the architect, delve into how the form was developed.
Fir Tree Dynamics
The “Airports of Region” holding is planning to build an airport in Karachay-Cherkessia, aiming to make the Arkhyz and Dombay resorts more accessible to travelers. The project that won in an invitation-only competition, submitted by Sergey Nikeshkin’s KPLN, blends natural imagery inspired by the shape of a conifer seed, open-air waiting spaces, majestic large trees, and a green roof elevated on needle-like columns. The result is both nature-inspired and WOW.
​A Brick Shell
In the process of designing a clubhouse situated among pine trees in a prestigious suburban area near Moscow, the architectural firm “A.Len” did the façade design part. The combination of different types of brick and masonry correlates with the volumetric and plastique solutions, further enhanced by the inclusion of wood-painted fragments and metal “glazing”.
Word Forms
ATRIUM architects love ambitious challenges, and for the firm’s thirtieth anniversary, they boldly play a game of words with an exhibition that dives deep into a self-created vocabulary. They immerse their projects – especially art installations – into this glossary, as if plunging into a current of their own. You feel as if you’re flowing through the veins of pure art, immersed in a universe of vertical cities, educational spaces – of which the architects are true masters – and the cultural codes of various locations. But what truly captivates is the bold statement that Vera Butko and Anton Nadtochy make, both through their work and this exhibition: architecture, above all, is art – the art of working with form and space.
Flexibility and Acuteness of Modernity
Luxurious, fluid, large “kokoshniks” and spiral barrel columns, as if made from colorful chewing gum: there seem to be no other mansion like this in Moscow, designed in the “Neo-Russian-Modern” style. And the “Teremok” on Malaya Kaluzhskaya, previously somewhat obscure, has “come alive with new colors” and gained visibility after its restoration for the office of the “architectural ecosystem” as the architects love to call themselves. It’s evident that Julius Borisov and the architects at UNK put their hearts into finding this new office and bringing it up to date. Let’s delve into the paradoxes of this mansion’s history and its plasticity. Spoiler: two versions of modernity meet here, both balancing on the razor’s edge of “what’s current”.
Yuri Vissarionov: “A modular house does not belong to the land”
It belongs to space, or to the air... It turns out that 3D printing is more effective when combined with a modular approach: the house is built in a workshop and then adapted to the site, including on uneven terrain. Yuri Vissarionov shares his latest experience in designing tourist complexes, both in central Russia and in the south. These include houseboats, homes printed from lightweight concrete using a 3D printer, and, of course, frame houses.
​Moscow’s First
“The quality of education largely depends on the quality of the educational environment”. This principle of the last decade has been realized by Sergey Skuratov in the project for the First Moscow Gymnasium on Rostovskaya Embankment in the Khamovniki district. The building seamlessly integrates into the complex urban landscape, responding both to the pedestrian flow of the city and the quiet alleyways. It skillfully takes advantage of the height differences and aligns with modern trends in educational space design. Let’s take a closer look.
Looking at the Water
The site of Villa Sonata stretches from the road to the water’s edge, offering its own shoreline, pier, and a picturesque river panorama. To reveal these sweeping views, Roman Leonidov “cut” the façade diagonally parallel to the river, thus getting two main axes for the house and, consequently, “two heads”. The internal core – two double-height spaces, a living room and a conservatory, with a “bridge” above them – makes the house both “transparent” and filled with light.
The White Wing
Well, it’s not exactly white. It’s more of a beige, white-stone structure that plays with the color of limestone – smoother surfaces are lighter, while rougher ones are darker. This wing unites various elements: it absorbs and interprets the surrounding themes. It responds to everything, yet maintains a cohesive expression – a challenging task! – while also incorporating recognizable features of its own, such as the dynamic cuts at the bottom, top, and middle.
Urban Dunes
The XSA Ramps team designed and built a three-part sports hub for a park in Rostov-on-Don, welcoming people of all ages and fitness levels. The skate plaza, pump track, and playground are all meticulously crafted with details that attract a diverse range of visitors. The technical execution of the shapes and slopes transforms this space into a kind of sculptural composition.
Proportional Growth
The project for the fourth phase of the ÁLIA residential area has been announced. The buildings are situated on an elongated plot – almost a “ray” that shoots out from the center of the area towards the river. Their layout reflects both a response to Moscow’s architectural preferences over the past 15 years, shifting “from blocks to towers”, and an interpretation of the neighboring business park designed by SOM. Additionally, the best apartments here are not located at the very top but closer to the middle, forming a glowing “waistline”.
The “Staircase” Building
In designing the “Details” residential complex in New Moscow, Rais Baishev spiced up the now-popular Moscow theme of a “courtyard” building with an idea drawn from the surrealist drawings by Maurits Escher. He envisioned the stepped silhouettes and descending slopes as a metaphysical mega-staircase, creating a key void within the courtyard that gave the project an internal “spine”. This concept is felt both in the building’s silhouette and on its façades.
Projection of the Quarter
No one doubted that the building that Vladimir Plotkin designed as part of the “Garden Quarters” would be the most modernist of all. And it turned out just that way: while adhering to the common design code, the building successfully combines brick and white stone, rhythmically responding to the neighboring building designed by Ostozhenka, yet tactfully and persistently making a few statements of its own. This includes the projection of the ideal urban development composition “14–9–6”, which can be found right next door, mathematical calculations, including those for various types of terraces (and perhaps the only reminder of the Soviet past of the Kauchuk rubber factory!), and the white “cross-stitch” pattern of the façade grid.
Domus Aurea
In this issue, we examine the “Tessinsky-1” house, designed by Sergey Skuratov and completed in 2023. Located in the middle of the Serebryanicheskaya Embankment district, at the intersection of its main streets, this house assumes a sort of “nodal” role: it not only responds to everything around it and preserves many memories of the former EMA factory within itself, but it weaves all this into a newly directed pattern, reconciling bright “gold” and dark-colored brick, largely with the help of the new, modern-yet-archaic Columba brick, which, come to think about it, is the most precious element here.
The Chimney of Nikola-Lenivets
In this issue, we are examining the “Obelisk House” designed by KATARSIS and built for the Arkhstoyanie 2023 festival. However, it was only finished later on, and this is why we are examining it now. It seems to us that after the “Obelisk House” appeared in Nikola-Lenivets, a dialogue and a few inner connections appeared between the temporary structures built here. These houses no longer look like “accidental neighbors”, more of which below.
​Periscope by the Bay
The jury awarded the second place in the competition for a public and cultural center in Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky to the companies GORA (“Mountain”) and M4. In the consortium’s proposal, the building resembles a sperm whale with a calf swimming next to it or a periscope, whose lenses capture the most spectacular views from the surrounding landscape.
From Arcs to Dolmens
While working on the competition project for Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky, ASADOV Architects prioritized the value of the natural and urban environment, aiming to preserve the balance of the location while minimizing the resemblance of the volume that they designed to a “traditional building”. The task was challenging, and the architects created three versions, one of which having been developed after the competition, where their main proposal took third place. However, the point of interest here is not the competition result but the continuity of creative thinking.
Hide and Seek
The ID Moskovskiy house, designed by Stepan Liphart in St. Petersburg, in the courtyards near Moskovskiy Avenue beyond the Obvodny Canal and recently completed, is notable for several reasons. Firstly, it has been realized with considerable accuracy, which is particularly significant as this is the first building where the architect was responsible not only for the facades but also for the layouts, allowing for better integration between the two. On the other hand, this building is interesting as an example of the “germination” of new architecture in the city: it draws on the best examples from the neighborhood and becomes an improved and developed sum of ideas found by the architect in the surrounding context.
The Big Twelve
Yesterday, the winners of the Moscow Mayor’s Architecture Award were announced and honored. Let’s take a look at what was awarded and, in some cases, even critique this esteemed award. After all, there is always room for improvement, right?
Above the Golden Horn
The residential complex “Philosophy” designed by T+T architects in Vladivostok, is one of the new projects in the “Golubinaya Pad” area, changing its development philosophy (pun intended) from single houses to a comprehensive approach. The buildings are organized along public streets, varying in height and format, with one house even executed in gallery typology, featuring a cantilever leaning on an art object.
Nuanced Alternative
How can you rhyme a square and space? Easily! But to do so, you need to rhyme everything you can possibly think of: weave everything together, like in a tensegrity structure, and find your own optics too. The new exhibition at GES-2 does just that, offering its visitor a new perspective on the history of art spanning 150 years, infused with the hope for endless multiplicity of worlds and art histories. Read on to see how this is achieved and how the exhibition design by Evgeny Ace contributes to it.
Blinds for Ice
An ice arena has been constructed in Domodedovo based on a project by Yuri Vissarionov Architects. To prevent the long façade, a technical requirement for winter sports facilities, from appearing monotonous, the architects proposed the use of suspended structures with multidirectional slats. This design protects the ice from direct sunlight while giving the wall texture and detail.