По-русски

​Sokolniki Park: Nature's Embassy in the Megalopolis

The contest for the best development concept for Sokolniki Park was won by the consortium of the British company Groundlab, Moscow’s Wowhaus, and Saint Petersburg institute of urban planning "Urbanica".

18 September 2014
Contest Results
mainImg
First place. "Nature's Embassy" Project. Authors: Groundlab (Netherlands), Wowhaus (Russia), Institute of urban planning "Urbanica" (Russia).



The international contest started on May 19 and consisted of two stages: the willingness to participate in it was expressed by 79 teams from different parts of the world but only ten consortiums from six countries were selected by the judging panel to pass into the second stage. Then, in the course of two months, these teams developed their proposals on the reconstruction of the park, and on the 16th of September, one day before the announcement of the results, the judging panel, presided by the head of Moscow Culture Department Sergey Kapkov, decided who the winner of the contest would be. This proved to be a tough call: as deputy chairman of the judging panel Marina Lulchuk notes, "each [of the second stage contestants - editor's note] deserved to win the first place and the winner was only identified by the point total". The session continued for more than six hours: the judging panel did not seem to be able to come to the final decision, and it was only the voting by points that helped the members to find the ultimate leader: the concept by Groundlab and Wowhaus that will determine the strategy of the park's development for the next 15 years.

Announcing the name of the contest winner, Sergey Kapkov noted that what the judging panel particularly liked about this project was not only the architectural and "ideological" part but also the sturdy and well thought-out economic model of developing the park by attracting the finances from outside the city budget. Thus the economy of the project became one of the most important criteria of evaluation. Apart from this, close attention was given to the sustainability of all the concepts and the probability of their actual implementation - because the main condition of the contest was keeping the environmental balance.

Sokolniki is one of Moscow's largest parks. It includes more than 500 hectares of green territory, 200 out of which are a natural zone of special protection. At the same time, most of the land (some 300 hectares), separated from the central area by a motorway, remains practically unused by the people. In this connection, the contestants were required to find a solution that would unite these two parts into a single natural complex. Andrew Lapshin, director of Sokolniki, noted that all the prize-winning projects address this issue to some degree - and this also became the decisive factor in choosing the winner. 

The second prize was given to SokoLab project that was presented by the French-Russian consortium headed by Debarre Duplantiers Associes (France). The third place was shared by two projects. According to the point rating, the third place was taken by the project entitled "Vremya Chaya" ("Tea Time" - translator's note) prepared by the consortium headed by Turenscape Architects of China. However, the management of the park also very much liked the project entitled "Sokolniki Park: Legacy Evolution" that was developed by Netherlands' LOLA landscape architects in cooperation with the professionals from Columbia, Russia, and Belgium. Apart from that, a special mention was given to yet another concept presented by the Dutch team MLA+B.V., in which the history of the park gracefully intertwines with the contemporary content. 

Hereby, we are presenting the prize-winning projects: 

First place. "Nature's Embassy".
Authors: Groundlab (Nethelands), Wowhaus (Russia), Institute of Urban Planning "Urbanica" (Russia). 


Oleg Shapiro, one of the authors of the winning project. Photo by Alla Pavlikova


First place. "Nature's Embassy" Project. Authors: Groundlab (Netherlands), Wowhaus (Russia), Institute of urban planning "Urbanica" (Russia).

Oleg Shapiro, leader of Wowhaus:
"Sokolniki is one of Moscow's largest park areas, whose territory is also connected to the Losiny Island. Considering the sheer magnitude of this green territory, we proposed to call our project "Nature's Embassy in Moscow". The main theme of the project became the communication of man and nature on the most various levels: from surveying the wild animals to planting trees and taking care of them. 


First place. "Nature's Embassy" Project. Authors: Groundlab (Netherlands), Wowhaus (Russia), Institute of urban planning "Urbanica" (Russia).

According to our concept, the natural corridor of the Losiny Island will be continued as far as the center of Sokolniki. This huge portion of the park will become a sanctuary totally outside the picture of urban development of the city. From the structural standpoint, the body of the park can be divided into three types of land use. The first one is precisely the belt that connects the Losiny Island to the park. In view of its primeval character, this belt was named "forest" in the project. The second layer is the park land which surrounds the "forest" and which is more accessible for the people. And, finally, the third part is the regular park, located at the entrance to Sokolniki, one that will gather all the entertainment and sport functions.


First place. "Nature's Embassy" Project. Authors: Groundlab (Netherlands), Wowhaus (Russia), Institute of urban planning "Urbanica" (Russia).


First place. "Nature's Embassy" Project. Authors: Groundlab (Netherlands), Wowhaus (Russia), Institute of urban planning "Urbanica" (Russia).


First place. "Nature's Embassy" Project. Authors: Groundlab (Netherlands), Wowhaus (Russia), Institute of urban planning "Urbanica" (Russia).

It was decided that the historical segmental structure of the park would be kept intact but at the same time each clearing will get a function of its own and will be decorated by its own particular plants. The driving map will also be significantly changed. The priority will be given to pedestrians but it will still be impossible to delete the car traffic off the traverse clearing altogether: it is planned that the auto and pedestrian flows will be spaced apart, special consideration given to the dedicated pathways for the animals between Sokolniki and the Losiny Island. 


First place. "Nature's Embassy" Project. Authors: Groundlab (Netherlands), Wowhaus (Russia), Institute of urban planning "Urbanica" (Russia).


First place. "Nature's Embassy" Project. Authors: Groundlab (Netherlands), Wowhaus (Russia), Institute of urban planning "Urbanica" (Russia).


First place. "Nature's Embassy" Project. Authors: Groundlab (Netherlands), Wowhaus (Russia), Institute of urban planning "Urbanica" (Russia).


First place. "Nature's Embassy" Project. Authors: Groundlab (Netherlands), Wowhaus (Russia), Institute of urban planning "Urbanica" (Russia).

Special attention is given to the economic concept of the park's development, according to which particular emphasis will be laid on the work of the expo center and the sport facilities". 


First place. "Nature's Embassy" Project. Authors: Groundlab (Netherlands), Wowhaus (Russia), Institute of urban planning "Urbanica" (Russia).


First place. "Nature's Embassy" Project. Authors: Groundlab (Netherlands), Wowhaus (Russia), Institute of urban planning "Urbanica" (Russia).


First place. "Nature's Embassy" Project. Authors: Groundlab (Netherlands), Wowhaus (Russia), Institute of urban planning "Urbanica" (Russia).

The judging panel especially noted the sustainability of the project coupled with the care for the history of Sokolniki, as well as the conformity of the project to the park's history. 

Second place. SokoLab
Authors: Debarre Duplantiers Associes (France), Ingerop (France), "Prostor" (Russia), Fetish Film (Russia), RDNK (Russia).

Second place. SokoLab Project. Authors: Debarre Duplantiers Associes, Ingerop (France), "Prostor" (Russia), Fetish Film (Russia), RDNK (Russia)


What the judging panel liked about this project was the detailed elaboration and the careful study of the peculiarities of the park. 


Second place. SokoLab Project. Authors: Debarre Duplantiers Associes, Ingerop (France), "Prostor" (Russia), Fetish Film (Russia), RDNK (Russia)


Second place. SokoLab Project. Authors: Debarre Duplantiers Associes, Ingerop (France), "Prostor" (Russia), Fetish Film (Russia), RDNK (Russia)


Second place. SokoLab Project. Authors: Debarre Duplantiers Associes, Ingerop (France), "Prostor" (Russia), Fetish Film (Russia), RDNK (Russia)


Second place. SokoLab Project. Authors: Debarre Duplantiers Associes, Ingerop (France), "Prostor" (Russia), Fetish Film (Russia), RDNK (Russia)


Second place. SokoLab Project. Authors: Debarre Duplantiers Associes, Ingerop (France), "Prostor" (Russia), Fetish Film (Russia), RDNK (Russia)


Second place. SokoLab Project. Authors: Debarre Duplantiers Associes, Ingerop (France), "Prostor" (Russia), Fetish Film (Russia), RDNK (Russia)


Second place. SokoLab Project. Authors: Debarre Duplantiers Associes, Ingerop (France), "Prostor" (Russia), Fetish Film (Russia), RDNK (Russia)


Second place. SokoLab Project. Authors: Debarre Duplantiers Associes, Ingerop (France), "Prostor" (Russia), Fetish Film (Russia), RDNK (Russia)


Second place. SokoLab Project. Authors: Debarre Duplantiers Associes, Ingerop (France), "Prostor" (Russia), Fetish Film (Russia), RDNK (Russia)

Third place. "Sokolniki Park: Evolution Legacy". 
Authors: Lola Landscape architects (Netherlands), Architectural group a3OH (Russia), Taller 301 (Columbia), Land + Civilization Compositions (Netherlands), Symboisis Grontmij Belgium NV (Belgium), Studio Transformer (Russia), Polyester.

Third place. "Sokolniki Park: Legacy Evolution". Authors: Lola Landscape architects (Netherlands), Architectural group ЗОН (Russia), Taller 301 (Columbia), Land + Civilization Compositions (Netherlands), Symboisis Grontmij Belgium NV (Belgium), Studio Transformer (Russia), Polyester


The judging panel gave special mention to the gracefulness and simplicity of the proposals and their possible implementation. For example, in one of the clearings the authors proposed to create a promenade surrounded by the palm trees and on the spot of today's greenhouses - make a huge lawn. 


Third place. "Sokolniki Park: Legacy Evolution". Authors: Lola Landscape architects (Netherlands), Architectural group ЗОН (Russia), Taller 301 (Columbia), Land + Civilization Compositions (Netherlands), Symboisis Grontmij Belgium NV (Belgium), Studio Transformer (Russia), Polyester


Third place. "Sokolniki Park: Legacy Evolution". Authors: Lola Landscape architects (Netherlands), Architectural group ЗОН (Russia), Taller 301 (Columbia), Land + Civilization Compositions (Netherlands), Symboisis Grontmij Belgium NV (Belgium), Studio Transformer (Russia), Polyester


Third place. "Sokolniki Park: Legacy Evolution". Authors: Lola Landscape architects (Netherlands), Architectural group ЗОН (Russia), Taller 301 (Columbia), Land + Civilization Compositions (Netherlands), Symboisis Grontmij Belgium NV (Belgium), Studio Transformer (Russia), Polyester


Third place. "Sokolniki Park: Legacy Evolution". Authors: Lola Landscape architects (Netherlands), Architectural group ЗОН (Russia), Taller 301 (Columbia), Land + Civilization Compositions (Netherlands), Symboisis Grontmij Belgium NV (Belgium), Studio Transformer (Russia), Polyester


Third place. "Sokolniki Park: Legacy Evolution". Authors: Lola Landscape architects (Netherlands), Architectural group ЗОН (Russia), Taller 301 (Columbia), Land + Civilization Compositions (Netherlands), Symboisis Grontmij Belgium NV (Belgium), Studio Transformer (Russia), Polyester


Third place. "Sokolniki Park: Legacy Evolution". Authors: Lola Landscape architects (Netherlands), Architectural group ЗОН (Russia), Taller 301 (Columbia), Land + Civilization Compositions (Netherlands), Symboisis Grontmij Belgium NV (Belgium), Studio Transformer (Russia), Polyester


Third place. "Sokolniki Park: Legacy Evolution". Authors: Lola Landscape architects (Netherlands), Architectural group ЗОН (Russia), Taller 301 (Columbia), Land + Civilization Compositions (Netherlands), Symboisis Grontmij Belgium NV (Belgium), Studio Transformer (Russia), Polyester


Third place. "Sokolniki Park: Legacy Evolution". Authors: Lola Landscape architects (Netherlands), Architectural group ЗОН (Russia), Taller 301 (Columbia), Land + Civilization Compositions (Netherlands), Symboisis Grontmij Belgium NV (Belgium), Studio Transformer (Russia), Polyester


Third place. "Sokolniki Park: Legacy Evolution". Authors: Lola Landscape architects (Netherlands), Architectural group ЗОН (Russia), Taller 301 (Columbia), Land + Civilization Compositions (Netherlands), Symboisis Grontmij Belgium NV (Belgium), Studio Transformer (Russia), Polyester

Third place. "Vremya Chaya" ("Tea Time")


Third place. "Vremya Chaya" ("Tea Time") Project. Authors: Turenscape (China), Strelka (Russia), MIX Design Studio, AECOM LLC (Russia)

Authors: Turenscape (China), Strelka (Russia), MIX Design Studio, AECOM LLC (Russia)
The authors went as far as coming up with a new conceptual name - "Park-Samovar" (an urn with a spigot at its base used in Russia to boil water for tea. - translator's note). The project is predominantly based on the Russian tradition of tea parties. All the park territory is filled with various thematic spots where the visitors can make a stop and have a cup of tea. 


Third place. "Vremya Chaya" ("Tea Time") Project. Authors: Turenscape (China), Strelka (Russia), MIX Design Studio, AECOM LLC (Russia)


Third place. "Vremya Chaya" ("Tea Time") Project. Authors: Turenscape (China), Strelka (Russia), MIX Design Studio, AECOM LLC (Russia)


Third place. "Vremya Chaya" ("Tea Time") Project. Authors: Turenscape (China), Strelka (Russia), MIX Design Studio, AECOM LLC (Russia)


Third place. "Vremya Chaya" ("Tea Time") Project. Authors: Turenscape (China), Strelka (Russia), MIX Design Studio, AECOM LLC (Russia)


Third place. "Vremya Chaya" ("Tea Time") Project. Authors: Turenscape (China), Strelka (Russia), MIX Design Studio, AECOM LLC (Russia)


Third place. "Vremya Chaya" ("Tea Time") Project. Authors: Turenscape (China), Strelka (Russia), MIX Design Studio, AECOM LLC (Russia)


Third place. "Vremya Chaya" ("Tea Time") Project. Authors: Turenscape (China), Strelka (Russia), MIX Design Studio, AECOM LLC (Russia)


Third place. "Vremya Chaya" ("Tea Time") Project. Authors: Turenscape (China), Strelka (Russia), MIX Design Studio, AECOM LLC (Russia)


Third place. "Vremya Chaya" ("Tea Time") Project. Authors: Turenscape (China), Strelka (Russia), MIX Design Studio, AECOM LLC (Russia)
***
Based on the results of the contest, Sokolniki Park will for three months present an exhibition of all the finalists' projects. According to Andrew Lapshin, the most interesting of ideas proposed by the prize winners will still be used in the implementation of the park reconstruction project, while their authors will be invited to take part in the project in their dedicated work areas. Sergey Kapkov also noted that the solutions proposed by the contest participants will surely be employed by the city because presently there will be implemented the mayor-approved program of improving Moscow's park territories: today, more than a hundred park territories have been handed over to the Culture Department that has the task of reconstructing them before 2017. 

The judging panel:
Chairman - Sergey Kapkov, minister of the Moscow government, chief of Moscow Culture Department;
Deputy chairman of the judging panel - Marina Lulchuk, director of "Mosgorpark United Management";
Deputy chairman of the judging panel - Olga Gritsan, chief of the department for development of the park territories of "Mosgorpark United Management";
Julia Kudryashova, deputy head of Moscow Department of Land Use and Conservation;
Digby Whyte, the main executive director of the International Federation of Park and Recreation; 
Eugene Ace, president of the architectural school "MARCH";
Taisia Wolftrub, president of the association of landscape architects of Russia, chief landscape architect of "EMPIRE" architectural bureau;
Elena Gonzales, architectural reviewer, curator of "ArchMoscow" exhibition; 
Elena Solovieva, head of the scientific and project association "Regulation of town-planning activities on the historical territories and protected areas of cultural legacy monuments" of Research and Development Institute of the General Plan of Moscow;
Gabriele Filippini, architect, professor, leader of Studio Arch Gabriele Filippini;
Guillermo Penalosa, expert in the field of the development of city parks, increasing the mobility, and attaching the city people to the transformation of the city environment, executive director of "8-80 Cities" (Canada);
Muriel Russo-Ovchinnikov, the founder and creative director of "Lieu Commun" agency;
Eugenia Galetka, the managing partner and General director of "Journey" event-agency;
Julia Shakhnovskaya, director of the Polytechnic Museum;
Natalia Danilina, director of the ecology education center "Sanctuaries";
Natalia Matveeva, the curator of the department of the gardening monuments under the Agency for preservation of special cultural legacy objects of the Department of Cultural Legacy of Moscow.
First place. "Nature's Embassy" Project. Authors: Groundlab (Netherlands), Wowhaus (Russia), Institute of urban planning "Urbanica" (Russia).
Oleg Shapiro, one of the authors of the winning project. Photo by Alla Pavlikova
First place. "Nature's Embassy" Project. Authors: Groundlab (Netherlands), Wowhaus (Russia), Institute of urban planning "Urbanica" (Russia).
First place. "Nature's Embassy" Project. Authors: Groundlab (Netherlands), Wowhaus (Russia), Institute of urban planning "Urbanica" (Russia).
First place. "Nature's Embassy" Project. Authors: Groundlab (Netherlands), Wowhaus (Russia), Institute of urban planning "Urbanica" (Russia).
First place. "Nature's Embassy" Project. Authors: Groundlab (Netherlands), Wowhaus (Russia), Institute of urban planning "Urbanica" (Russia).
First place. "Nature's Embassy" Project. Authors: Groundlab (Netherlands), Wowhaus (Russia), Institute of urban planning "Urbanica" (Russia).
First place. "Nature's Embassy" Project. Authors: Groundlab (Netherlands), Wowhaus (Russia), Institute of urban planning "Urbanica" (Russia).
First place. "Nature's Embassy" Project. Authors: Groundlab (Netherlands), Wowhaus (Russia), Institute of urban planning "Urbanica" (Russia).
First place. "Nature's Embassy" Project. Authors: Groundlab (Netherlands), Wowhaus (Russia), Institute of urban planning "Urbanica" (Russia).
First place. "Nature's Embassy" Project. Authors: Groundlab (Netherlands), Wowhaus (Russia), Institute of urban planning "Urbanica" (Russia).
First place. "Nature's Embassy" Project. Authors: Groundlab (Netherlands), Wowhaus (Russia), Institute of urban planning "Urbanica" (Russia).
First place. "Nature's Embassy" Project. Authors: Groundlab (Netherlands), Wowhaus (Russia), Institute of urban planning "Urbanica" (Russia).
First place. "Nature's Embassy" Project. Authors: Groundlab (Netherlands), Wowhaus (Russia), Institute of urban planning "Urbanica" (Russia).
Second place. SokoLab Project. Authors: Debarre Duplantiers Associes, Ingerop (France), "Prostor" (Russia), Fetish Film (Russia), RDNK (Russia)
Second place. SokoLab Project. Authors: Debarre Duplantiers Associes, Ingerop (France), "Prostor" (Russia), Fetish Film (Russia), RDNK (Russia)
Second place. SokoLab Project. Authors: Debarre Duplantiers Associes, Ingerop (France), "Prostor" (Russia), Fetish Film (Russia), RDNK (Russia)
Second place. SokoLab Project. Authors: Debarre Duplantiers Associes, Ingerop (France), "Prostor" (Russia), Fetish Film (Russia), RDNK (Russia)
Second place. SokoLab Project. Authors: Debarre Duplantiers Associes, Ingerop (France), "Prostor" (Russia), Fetish Film (Russia), RDNK (Russia)
Second place. SokoLab Project. Authors: Debarre Duplantiers Associes, Ingerop (France), "Prostor" (Russia), Fetish Film (Russia), RDNK (Russia)
Second place. SokoLab Project. Authors: Debarre Duplantiers Associes, Ingerop (France), "Prostor" (Russia), Fetish Film (Russia), RDNK (Russia)
Second place. SokoLab Project. Authors: Debarre Duplantiers Associes, Ingerop (France), "Prostor" (Russia), Fetish Film (Russia), RDNK (Russia)
Second place. SokoLab Project. Authors: Debarre Duplantiers Associes, Ingerop (France), "Prostor" (Russia), Fetish Film (Russia), RDNK (Russia)
Second place. SokoLab Project. Authors: Debarre Duplantiers Associes, Ingerop (France), "Prostor" (Russia), Fetish Film (Russia), RDNK (Russia)
Third place. "Sokolniki Park: Legacy Evolution". Authors: Lola Landscape architects (Netherlands), Architectural group ЗОН (Russia), Taller 301 (Columbia), Land + Civilization Compositions (Netherlands), Symboisis Grontmij Belgium NV (Belgium), Studio Tra
Third place. "Sokolniki Park: Legacy Evolution". Authors: Lola Landscape architects (Netherlands), Architectural group ЗОН (Russia), Taller 301 (Columbia), Land + Civilization Compositions (Netherlands), Symboisis Grontmij Belgium NV (Belgium), Studio Tra
Third place. "Sokolniki Park: Legacy Evolution". Authors: Lola Landscape architects (Netherlands), Architectural group ЗОН (Russia), Taller 301 (Columbia), Land + Civilization Compositions (Netherlands), Symboisis Grontmij Belgium NV (Belgium), Studio Tra
Third place. "Sokolniki Park: Legacy Evolution". Authors: Lola Landscape architects (Netherlands), Architectural group ЗОН (Russia), Taller 301 (Columbia), Land + Civilization Compositions (Netherlands), Symboisis Grontmij Belgium NV (Belgium), Studio Tra
Third place. "Sokolniki Park: Legacy Evolution". Authors: Lola Landscape architects (Netherlands), Architectural group ЗОН (Russia), Taller 301 (Columbia), Land + Civilization Compositions (Netherlands), Symboisis Grontmij Belgium NV (Belgium), Studio Tra
Third place. "Sokolniki Park: Legacy Evolution". Authors: Lola Landscape architects (Netherlands), Architectural group ЗОН (Russia), Taller 301 (Columbia), Land + Civilization Compositions (Netherlands), Symboisis Grontmij Belgium NV (Belgium), Studio Tra
Third place. "Sokolniki Park: Legacy Evolution". Authors: Lola Landscape architects (Netherlands), Architectural group ЗОН (Russia), Taller 301 (Columbia), Land + Civilization Compositions (Netherlands), Symboisis Grontmij Belgium NV (Belgium), Studio Tra
Third place. "Sokolniki Park: Legacy Evolution". Authors: Lola Landscape architects (Netherlands), Architectural group ЗОН (Russia), Taller 301 (Columbia), Land + Civilization Compositions (Netherlands), Symboisis Grontmij Belgium NV (Belgium), Studio Tra
Third place. "Sokolniki Park: Legacy Evolution". Authors: Lola Landscape architects (Netherlands), Architectural group ЗОН (Russia), Taller 301 (Columbia), Land + Civilization Compositions (Netherlands), Symboisis Grontmij Belgium NV (Belgium), Studio Tra
Third place. "Sokolniki Park: Legacy Evolution". Authors: Lola Landscape architects (Netherlands), Architectural group ЗОН (Russia), Taller 301 (Columbia), Land + Civilization Compositions (Netherlands), Symboisis Grontmij Belgium NV (Belgium), Studio Tra
Third place. "Vremya Chaya" ("Tea Time") Project. Authors: Turenscape (China), Strelka (Russia), MIX Design Studio, AECOM LLC (Russia)
Third place. "Vremya Chaya" ("Tea Time") Project. Authors: Turenscape (China), Strelka (Russia), MIX Design Studio, AECOM LLC (Russia)
Third place. "Vremya Chaya" ("Tea Time") Project. Authors: Turenscape (China), Strelka (Russia), MIX Design Studio, AECOM LLC (Russia)
Third place. "Vremya Chaya" ("Tea Time") Project. Authors: Turenscape (China), Strelka (Russia), MIX Design Studio, AECOM LLC (Russia)
Third place. "Vremya Chaya" ("Tea Time") Project. Authors: Turenscape (China), Strelka (Russia), MIX Design Studio, AECOM LLC (Russia)
Third place. "Vremya Chaya" ("Tea Time") Project. Authors: Turenscape (China), Strelka (Russia), MIX Design Studio, AECOM LLC (Russia)
Third place. "Vremya Chaya" ("Tea Time") Project. Authors: Turenscape (China), Strelka (Russia), MIX Design Studio, AECOM LLC (Russia)
Third place. "Vremya Chaya" ("Tea Time") Project. Authors: Turenscape (China), Strelka (Russia), MIX Design Studio, AECOM LLC (Russia)
Third place. "Vremya Chaya" ("Tea Time") Project. Authors: Turenscape (China), Strelka (Russia), MIX Design Studio, AECOM LLC (Russia)
Third place. "Vremya Chaya" ("Tea Time") Project. Authors: Turenscape (China), Strelka (Russia), MIX Design Studio, AECOM LLC (Russia)


18 September 2014

Headlines now
The Big Twelve
Yesterday, the winners of the Moscow Mayor’s Architecture Award were announced and honored. Let’s take a look at what was awarded and, in some cases, even critique this esteemed award. After all, there is always room for improvement, right?
Above the Golden Horn
The residential complex “Philosophy” designed by T+T architects in Vladivostok, is one of the new projects in the “Golubinaya Pad” area, changing its development philosophy (pun intended) from single houses to a comprehensive approach. The buildings are organized along public streets, varying in height and format, with one house even executed in gallery typology, featuring a cantilever leaning on an art object.
Nuanced Alternative
How can you rhyme a square and space? Easily! But to do so, you need to rhyme everything you can possibly think of: weave everything together, like in a tensegrity structure, and find your own optics too. The new exhibition at GES-2 does just that, offering its visitor a new perspective on the history of art spanning 150 years, infused with the hope for endless multiplicity of worlds and art histories. Read on to see how this is achieved and how the exhibition design by Evgeny Ace contributes to it.
Blinds for Ice
An ice arena has been constructed in Domodedovo based on a project by Yuri Vissarionov Architects. To prevent the long façade, a technical requirement for winter sports facilities, from appearing monotonous, the architects proposed the use of suspended structures with multidirectional slats. This design protects the ice from direct sunlight while giving the wall texture and detail.
Campus within a Day
In this article, we talk about what the participants of Genplan Institute of Moscow’s hackathon were doing at the MosComArchitecture booth at the “ArchMoscow” exhibition. We also discuss who won the prize and why, and what can be done with the territory of a small university on the outskirts of Moscow.
Vertical Civilization
Genpro considered the development of the vertical city concept and made it the theme of their pavilion at the “ArchMoscow” exhibition.
Marina Yegorova: “We think in terms of hectares, not square meters”
The career path of architect Marina Yegorova is quite impressive: MARHI, SPEECH, MosComArchitectura, the Genplan Institute of Moscow, and then her own architectural company. Its name Empate, which refers to the words “to draw” in Portuguese and “to empathize” in English, should not be misleading with its softness, as the firm freely works on different scales, including Integrated Territorial Development projects. We talked with Marina about various topics: urban planning experience, female leadership style, and even the love of architects for yachting.
Andrey Chuikov: “Optimum balance is achieved through economics”
The Yekaterinburg-based architectural company CNTR is in its mature stage: crystallization of principles, systematization, and standardization helped it make a qualitative leap, enhance competencies, and secure large contracts without sacrificing the aesthetic component. The head of the company, Andrey Chuikov, told us about building a business model and the bonuses that additional education in financial management provides for an architect.
The Fulcrum
Ostozhenka Architects have designed two astonishing towers practically on the edge of a slope above the Oka River in Nizhny Novgorod. These towers stand on 10-meter-tall weathered steel “legs”, with each floor offering panoramic views of the river and the city; all public spaces, including corridors, receive plenty of natural light. Here, we see a multitude of solutions that are unconventional for the residential routine of our day and age. Meanwhile, although these towers hark back to the typological explorations of the seventies, they are completely reinvented in a contemporary key. We admire Veren Group as the client – this is exactly how a “unique product” should be made – and we tell you exactly how our towers are arranged.
Crystal is Watching You
Right now, Museum Night has kicked off at the Museum of Architecture, featuring a fresh new addition – the “Crystal of Perception”, an installation by Sergey Kuznetsov, Ivan Grekov, and the KROST company, set up in the courtyard. It shimmers with light, it sings, it reacts to the approach of people, and who knows what else it can do.
The Secret Briton
The house is called “Little France”. Its composition follows the classical St. Petersburg style, with a palace-like courtyard. The decor is on the brink of Egyptian lotuses, neo-Greek acroteria, and classic 1930s “gears”; the recessed piers are Gothic, while the silhouette of the central part of the house is British. It’s quite interesting to examine all these details, attempting to understand which architectural direction they belong to. At the same time, however, the house fits like a glove in the context of the 20th line of St. Petersburg’s Vasilievsky Island; its elongated wings hold up the façade quite well.
The Wrap-Up
The competition project proposed by Treivas for the first 2021 competition for the Russian pavilion at EXPO 2025 concludes our series of publications on pavilion projects that will not be implemented. This particular proposal stands out for its detailed explanations and the idea of ecological responsibility: both the facades and the exhibition inside were intended to utilize recycled materials.
Birds and Streams
For the competition to design the Omsk airport, DNK ag formed a consortium, inviting VOX architects and Sila Sveta. Their project focuses on intersections, journeys, and flights – both of people and birds – as Omsk is known as a “transfer point” for bird migrations. The educational component is also carefully considered, and the building itself is filled with light, which seems to deconstruct the copper circle of the central entrance portal, spreading it into fantastic hyper-spatial “slices”.
Faraday Grid
The project of the Omsk airport by ASADOV Architects is another concept among the 14 finalists of a recent competition. It is called “The Bridge” and is inspired by both the West Siberian Exhibition of 1911 and the Trans-Siberian Railway bridge over the Irtysh River, built in 1896. On one hand, it carries a steampunk vibe, while on the other, there’s almost a sense of nostalgia for the heyday of 1913. However, the concept offers two variants, the second one devoid of nostalgia but featuring a parabola.
Midway upon the Journey of Our Life
Recently, Tatlin Publishing House released a book entitled “Architect Sergey Oreshkin. Selected Projects”. This book is not just a traditional book of the architectural company’s achievements, but rather a monograph of a more personal nature. The book includes 43 buildings as well as a section with architectural drawings. In this article, we reflect on the book as a way to take stock of an architect’s accomplishments.
Inverted Fortress
This year, there has been no shortage of intriguing architectural ideas around the Omsk airport. The project developed by the architectural company KPLN appeals to Omsk’s history as a wooden fortress that it was back in the day, but transforms the concept of a fortress beyond recognition: it “shaves off” the conical ends of “wooden logs”, then enlarges them, and then flips them over. The result is a hypostyle – a forest of conical columns on point supports, with skylights on top.
Transformation of Annenkirche
For Annenkirche (St. Anna Lutheran Church in St. Petersburg), Sergey Kuznetsov and the Kamen bureau have prepared a project that relies on the principles of the Venice Charter: the building is not restored to a specific date, historical layers are preserved, and modern elements do not mimic the authentic ones. Let’s delve into the details of these solutions.
The Paradox of the Temporary
The concept of the Russian pavilion for EXPO 2025 in Osaka, proposed by the Wowhaus architects, is the last of the six projects we gathered from the 2022 competition. It is again worth noting that the results of this competition were not finalized due to the cancellation of Russia’s participation in World Expo 2025. It should be mentioned that Wowhaus created three versions for this competition, but only one is being presented, and it can’t be said that this version is thoroughly developed – rather, it is done in the spirit of a “student assignment”. Nevertheless, the project is interesting in its paradoxical nature: the architects emphasized the temporary character of the pavilion, and in its bubble-like forms sought to reflect the paradoxes of space and time.
The Forum of Time
The competition project for the Russian Pavilion at EXPO 2025 in Osaka designed by Aleksey Orlov and Arena Project Institute consists of cones and conical funnels connected into a non-trivial composition, where one can feel the hand of architects who have worked extensively with stadiums and other sports facilities. It’s very interesting to delve into its logic, structurally built on the theme of clocks, hourglasses and even sundials. Additionally, the architects have turned the exhibition pavilion into a series of interconnected amphitheaters, which is also highly relevant for world exhibitions. We are reminding you that the competition results were never announced.
Mirrors Everywhere
The project by Sergey Nebotov, Anastasia Gritskova, and the architectural company “Novoe” was created for the Russian pavilion at EXPO 2025, but within the framework of another competition, which, as we learned, took place even earlier, in 2021. At that time, the competition theme was “digital twins”, and there was minimal time for work, so the project, according to the architect himself, was more of a “student assignment”. Nevertheless, this project is interesting for its plan bordering on similarity with Baroque projects and the emblem of the exhibition, as well as its diverse and comprehensive reflectiveness.
The Steppe Is Full of Beauty and Freedom
The goal of the exhibition “Dikoe Pole” (“Wild Field”) at the State Historical Museum was to move away from the archaeological listing of valuable items and to create an image of the steppe and nomads that was multidirectional and emotional – in other words, artistic. To achieve this goal, it was important to include works of contemporary art. One such work is the scenography of the exhibition space developed by CHART studio.
The Snowstorm Fish
The next project from the unfinished competition for the Russian Pavilion at EXPO 2025, which will be held in Osaka, Japan, is by Dashi Namdakov and Parsec Architects. The pavilion describes itself as an “architectural/sculptural” one, with its shape clearly reminiscent of abstract sculpture of the 1970s. It complements its program with a meditative hall named “Mendeleev’s Dreams”, and offers its visitors to slide from its roof at the end of the tour.
The Mirror of Your Soul
We continue to publish projects from the competition for the design of the Russian Pavilion at EXPO in Osaka 2025. We are reminding you that the results of the competition have not been announced, and hardly will ever be. The pavilion designed by ASADOV Architects combines a forest log cabin, the image of a hyper transition, and sculptures made of glowing threads – it focuses primarily on the scenography of the exhibition, which the pavilion builds sequentially like a string of impressions, dedicating it to the paradoxes of the Russian soul.
Part of the Ideal
In 2025, another World Expo will take place in Osaka, Japan, in which Russia will not participate. However, a competition for the Russian pavilion was indeed held, with six projects participating. The results were never announced as Russia’s participation was canceled; the competition has no winners. Nevertheless, Expo pavilion projects are typically designed for a bold and interesting architectural statement, so we’ve gathered all the six projects and will be publishing articles about them in random order. The first one is the project by Vladimir Plotkin and Reserve Union, which is distinguished by the clarity of its stereometric shape, the boldness of its structure, and the multiplicity of possible interpretations.
The Fortress by the River
ASADOV Architects have developed a concept for a new residential district in the center of Kemerovo. To combat the harsh climate and monotonous everyday life, the architects proposed a block type of development with dominant towers, good insolation, facades detailed at eye level, and event programming.
In the Rhombus Grid
Construction has begun on the building of the OMK (United Metallurgical Company) Corporate University in Nizhny Novgorod’s town of Vyksa, designed by Ostozhenka Architects. The most interesting aspect of the project is how the architects immersed it in the context: “extracting” a diagonal motif from the planning grid of Vyksa, they aligned the building, the square, and the park to match it. A truly masterful work with urban planning context on several different levels of perception has long since become the signature technique of Ostozhenka.
​Generational Connection
Another modern estate, designed by Roman Leonidov, is located in the Moscow region and brings together three generations of one family under one roof. To fit on a narrow plot without depriving anyone of personal space, the architects opted for a zigzag plan. The main volume in the house structure is accentuated by mezzanines with a reverse-sloped roof and ceilings featuring exposed beams.
Three Dimensions of the City
We began to delve into the project by Sergey Skuratov, the residential complex “Depo” in Minsk, located at Victory Square, and it fascinated us completely. The project has at least several dimensions to it: historical – at some point, the developer decided to discontinue further collaboration with Sergey Skuratov Architects, but the concept was approved, and its implementation continues, mostly in accordance with the proposed ideas. The spatial and urban planning dimension – the architects both argue with the city and play along with it, deciphering nuances, and finding axes. And, finally, the tactile dimension – the constructed buildings also have their own intriguing features. Thus, this article also has two parts: it dwells on what has been built and what was conceived
New “Flight”
Architects from “Mezonproject” have developed a project for the reconstruction of the regional youth center “Polyot”(“Flight”) in the city of Oryol. The summer youth center, built back in the late 1970s, will now become year-round and acquire many additional functions.
The Yauza Towers
In Moscow, there aren’t that many buildings or projects designed by Nikita Yavein and Studio 44. In this article, we present to you the concept of a large multifunctional complex on the Yauza River, located between two parks, featuring a promenade, a crossroads of two pedestrian streets, a highly developed public space, and an original architectural solution. This solution combines a sophisticated, asymmetric façade grid, reminiscent of a game of fifteen puzzle, and bold protrusions of the upper parts of the buildings, completely masking the technical floors and sculpting the complex’s silhouette.