По-русски

The White Wing

Well, it’s not exactly white. It’s more of a beige, white-stone structure that plays with the color of limestone – smoother surfaces are lighter, while rougher ones are darker. This wing unites various elements: it absorbs and interprets the surrounding themes. It responds to everything, yet maintains a cohesive expression – a challenging task! – while also incorporating recognizable features of its own, such as the dynamic cuts at the bottom, top, and middle.

26 August 2024
Object
mainImg
The northwest building of the second quarter of the “Garden Quarters” is the work of Ostozhenka Architects and it forms a somewhat asymmetrical pair with the southeast wing designed by Reserve Union.

At first glance, it might seem simple: contrast and similarity. One building is black, the other is white; both are quite large, stretched towards 3rd Frunzenskaya Street, with stepped facades that echo each other – almost like they are exchanging glances – with matching steps and protrusions. Both adhere to the design code of the “Garden Quarters”, proposed by Sergey Skuratov, yet at the same time, both are expressions of their respective authors, just as was intended back in 2007. So, it’s not just about contrast and similarity: there are subtler differences and nuances within each theme. These are interpreted with a certain strictness and restraint, reflecting the authors’ beliefs, avoiding flashy sculptural effects, and maintaining a reasonable balance, which contributes to the overall cohesion of the complex. At a glance, making sense of it all might seem like a tall order, but, upon closer inspection, one can indeed discern a lot of nuances of subtleties and similarities.

The quarter itself is almost enclosed. Its courtyard, like all the courtyards of the “Garden Quarters”, is both recessed and multi-leveled, a feature enhanced in the second quarter by the change in elevation – this is where the Moscow landscape gently rises “uphill”. As a result, a small public space has formed along the outer contour of the quarters facing 3rd Frunzenskaya Street – in addition to the impressive urban square with a pond at their center. I’ve already described this interesting space as a “city balcony”.

Indeed, it resembles a balcony – or even two balconies, to be exact.

If you exit under the archway between the fourth and second quarters and turn right at the corner of the black building, you find yourself on a boulevard with stone paving on the right and rather lush (including meadow-like!) greenery on the left.

View of the minor buildings from the side of 3rd Frunzenskaya Street. “Garden Quarters” housing complex. Quarter 2, buildings 2.7-2.10
Copyright: Photograph © Daniel Annenkov / provided by Ostozhenka


The paved area is a pedestrian street, and from there, you can turn slightly right, descending a bit: here, in the gaps between the low-rise buildings, are two platforms with glass railings offering views into the courtyard of the second quarter, making it somewhat less secluded from the city. One platform is located between the black and white buildings, the other between the white building’s sections. The first platform hosts a shop, and the second has a café where you can sit comfortably – it’s not exactly secluded, but it’s a quiet and cozy nook with a view of the courtyard from above. It’s indeed a true balcony, an original spatial solution that fits into the multi-level concepts, which have been a signature technique, almost a credo of the “Garden Quarters” since the project first appeared in the public eye.

  • zooming
    “Garden Quarters” housing complex. Quarter 2, buildings 2.7-2.10
    Copyright: Photograph © Daniel Annenkov / provided by Ostozhenka
  • zooming
    View of the minor buildings from the side of 3rd Frunzenskaya Street. “Garden Quarters” housing complex. Quarter 2, buildings 2.7-2.10
    Copyright: Photograph © Daniel Annenkov / provided by Ostozhenka


  • zooming
    “Garden Quarters” housing complex. Quarter 2, buildings 2.7-2.10
    Copyright: Photograph © Daniel Annenkov / provided by Ostozhenka
  • zooming
    View of the monor buildings from the yard. “Garden Quarters” housing complex. Quarter 2, buildings 2.7-2.10
    Copyright: Photograph © Daniel Annenkov / provided by Ostozhenka


The Ostozhenka building takes up two-thirds of the “city balcony”, as its low-rise section extends twice as far south.

The building itself is taller and more massive than its neighbor, with only two steps instead of three. The larger volume, starting from the neighboring 17-story brick building designed by Sergey Skuratov, stretches to 14 stories along two-thirds of its length, combining three sections, and then drops by only two floors, to twelve, before it turns and halves to six stories in two volumes along 3rd Frunzenskaya Street.

However, there are more ledges and cuts here, especially in the lower part: a large archway, five stories high, one of Ostozhenka’s favorite techniques, plus a through “window” in the body of the building where one of the courtyard bridges adjoins.

  • zooming
    “Garden Quarters” housing complex. Quarter 2, buildings 2.7-2.10
    Copyright: Photograph © Daniel Annenkov / provided by Ostozhenka
  • zooming
    “Garden Quarters” housing complex. Quarter 2, buildings 2.7-2.10
    Copyright: Photograph © Daniel Annenkov / provided by Ostozhenka


If you look at the façade pattern, it doesn’t follow the rhythmic step of the five sections that make up the extended volume but instead turns into a puzzle reminiscent of Tetris: it’s as if two volumes are joined here – one partially mirrors the steps of the building designed by Reserve Union, but asymmetrically and in the opposite direction. The grid of its facades is noticeably more material, as it uses splayed reveals that widen the spaces between the windows. The other volume seems to be placed on top of it – its grid of reveals, on the contrary, is thin, grouping the windows in pairs vertically, and besides that, it “dissolves” towards the south as the stone gradually gives way to black metallic inserts. To some extent, it reflects the more rigid and measured black structure, but not like in a mirror, more like in water – not in the exact way, not even as a reflection, but more like a retelling. Some kind of dialogue, which is not even a dialogue after all, not really.

  • zooming
    “Garden Quarters” housing complex. Quarter 2, buildings 2.7-2.10
    Copyright: © Ostozhenka
  • zooming
    “Garden Quarters” housing complex. Quarter 2, buildings 2.7-2.10
    Copyright: © Ostozhenka


The theme is repeated on the exterior façade, and as we observe it, we see that three frames above the lobby’s stained glass contribute to the stepped form within the courtyard.

“Garden Quarters” housing complex. Quarter 2, buildings 2.7-2.10
Copyright: Photograph © Daniel Annenkov / provided by Ostozhenka


However, there is quite a bit of dynamism on the facades. For instance, on the end of the elongated building, the grid in the upper part gradually loses its reveals – the two themes, voluminous and thin-boned, blend together unobtrusively.

  • zooming
    “Garden Quarters” housing complex. Quarter 2, buildings 2.7-2.10
    Copyright: Photograph © Daniel Annenkov / provided by Ostozhenka
  • zooming
    “Garden Quarters” housing complex. Quarter 2, buildings 2.7-2.10
    Copyright: Photograph © Daniel Annenkov / provided by Ostozhenka


And if we look at the smaller buildings, there’s even less stone “matter” there. From the courtyard side, their facades transform into a veritable Mondrian-esque pattern, resembling an asymmetric “sliding puzzle”. On the outside, they are voluminous with reveals, while inside, they become two-dimensional and purely graphical. This is beautiful, light, and harmonizes well with the dark building designed by Reserve Union, which gravitates towards flatness.

  • zooming
    “Garden Quarters” housing complex. Quarter 2, buildings 2.7-2.10
    Copyright: Photograph © Daniel Annenkov / provided by Ostozhenka
  • zooming
    “Garden Quarters” housing complex. Quarter 2, buildings 2.7-2.10
    Copyright: Photograph © Daniel Annenkov / provided by Ostozhenka


Just a couple of techniques: stone bevels, steps, black metal inserts – but there are many variations of the “melody”, with emphasis sometimes on rhythm, sometimes on volume, sometimes on flatness and line. I believe such diversity became possible because, unlike the neighboring building, essentially only one material was used on the facades of this building. Glass, tinted glass, and black metal as “background” participants don’t count: here, limestone, white stone, is the dominant material.

  • zooming
    “Garden Quarters” housing complex. Quarter 2, buildings 2.7-2.10
    Copyright: Photograph © Daniel Annenkov / provided by Ostozhenka
  • zooming
    “Garden Quarters” housing complex. Quarter 2, buildings 2.7-2.10
    Copyright: Photograph © Daniel Annenkov / provided by Ostozhenka


And this is very important because the foundation of the “Garden Quarters” design code is brick and white stone.

But if you look globally, there’s more brick in the “Garden Quarters”. In our building, however, it’s just stone. In this, the Ostozhenka building echoes the two buildings by Sergey Skuratov, flanking Roman Klein’s building on Usacheva Street. Their slanted facades form a giant “portal” on either side of Klein, which is echoed on a smaller scale by the rough stone reveals against the smooth exterior surface. Similar reveals, accompanied by stone “steps” accentuating the grid lines, are also present in Skuratov’s stone buildings within the second quarter, on the pond side.

Ostozhenka draws inspiration from its neighbors, incorporating both steps and reveals, but separates them: the first for the fine grid, the second for the denser one.

  • zooming
    “Garden Quarters” housing complex. Quarter 2, buildings 2.7-2.10
    Copyright: Photograph © Daniel Annenkov / provided by Ostozhenka
  • zooming
    “Garden Quarters” housing complex. Quarter 2, buildings 2.7-2.10
    Copyright: Photograph © Daniel Annenkov / provided by Ostozhenka


The two types of grids – vertical and horizontal, thin and voluminous – also respond to the characteristics of the two neighboring buildings. The thin vertical grid employs the characteristic gradient of gradual “dissolution” of mass (and sometimes color) typical of the “Garden Quarters” and Sergey Skuratov’s buildings, while the horizontal one echoes the chessboard rhythm of Plotkin’s building.

The “Ostozhenka” building unifies and reconciles these elements through both material and composition. It’s as if it says: we can live together peacefully! And indeed, there is no radical contradiction between the vertical and horizontal structures when they are side by side – it’s even more enjoyable.

However, it’s fascinating to observe how sensitively this building responds to all the features of its surroundings while maintaining the integrity of its expression, largely thanks to the material.

  • zooming
    “Garden Quarters” housing complex. Quarter 2, buildings 2.7-2.10
    Copyright: Photograph © Daniel Annenkov / provided by Ostozhenka
  • zooming
    “Garden Quarters” housing complex. Quarter 2, buildings 2.7-2.10
    Copyright: Photograph © Daniel Annenkov / provided by Ostozhenka


This brings us back to the “Mondrianesque pattern”, mentioned earlier, on the inner side of the smaller volumes – because, when looking at the “Ostozhenka” building as a whole, one can see a progression: from the northeastern pole, where it neighbors Skuratov’s brick building (there the grid is strict and vertical) to the southern buildings (where the grid stretches as in knit weaving, but more geometrically). Finally, in the courtyard, the grid flattens out, transforming into an “abstract painting”.

“Garden Quarters” housing complex. Quarter 2, buildings 2.7-2.10
Copyright: Photograph © Daniel Annenkov / provided by Ostozhenka


And the cutouts – they are significant here, not only dividing the building into parts “for ventilation” but also creating axes, at least two transverse ones, through the courtyard, at the top and bottom. Their shape echoes the window reveals: for example, the upper lintels of the “arches” flare out toward the courtyard.

  • zooming
    “Garden Quarters” housing complex. Quarter 2, buildings 2.7-2.10
    Copyright: Photograph © Daniel Annenkov / provided by Ostozhenka
  • zooming
    “Garden Quarters” housing complex. Quarter 2, buildings 2.7-2.10
    Copyright: Photograph © Daniel Annenkov / provided by Ostozhenka


These facades are full of movement, inviting you to examine them, compare the parts, ask yourself – why is it like this? Answer that question, move on... The façade grid tells a whole fascinating story here.



The duplex apartments in the “Ostozhenka” building are situated in the upper sections of all the blocks, including the smaller six-story ones. Each of these apartments is equipped with fireplaces, and in the smaller blocks, every apartment on all floors has a fireplace. The duplex apartments also feature terraces: in the smaller volumes, they face the pedestrian boulevard of 3rd Frunzenskaya Street, while in the apartments grouped along the inner contour of the extended block, the terraces overlook the courtyard.

It’s worth noting that the terraces in the “Ostozhenka” building are completely hidden from the outside; they are more like patios, open to the sky but enclosed on all four sides by windows. Without prior knowledge, it’s impossible to guess the intricate design of the upper part of the building. The architects themselves acknowledge that it was the upper section, and not the façade, that became the “real puzzle”. And, as we can see, this puzzle was successfully solved.

  • zooming
    1 / 14
    “Garden Quarters” housing complex. Quarter 2, buildings 2.7-2.10
    Copyright: © Ostozhenka
  • zooming
    2 / 14
    “Garden Quarters” housing complex. Quarter 2, buildings 2.7-2.10. Cross-section 1-1 and 3-3
    Copyright: © Ostozhenka
  • zooming
    3 / 14
    “Garden Quarters” housing complex. Quarter 2, buildings 2.7-2.10. Plan of the 7th floor at +21.600 elevation
    Copyright: © Ostozhenka
  • zooming
    4 / 14
    “Garden Quarters” housing complex. Quarter 2, buildings 2.7-2.10. Plan of the 13th floor at +43.200 elevation
    Copyright: © Ostozhenka
  • zooming
    5 / 14
    “Garden Quarters” housing complex. Quarter 2, buildings 2.7-2.10. Plan of the 2nd floor at +39.600 elevation
    Copyright: © Ostozhenka
  • zooming
    6 / 14
    “Garden Quarters” housing complex. Quarter 2, buildings 2.7-2.10. Plan of the 11th floor at +36.000 elevation
    Copyright: © Ostozhenka
  • zooming
    7 / 14
    “Garden Quarters” housing complex. Quarter 2, buildings 2.7-2.10. Plan of the 6th floor at +18.000 elevation
    Copyright: © Ostozhenka
  • zooming
    8 / 14
    “Garden Quarters” housing complex. Quarter 2, buildings 2.7-2.10. Plan of the 5th floor at +14.400 elevation
    Copyright: © Ostozhenka
  • zooming
    9 / 14
    “Garden Quarters” housing complex. Quarter 2, buildings 2.7-2.10. Plan of the 2nd floor at +3.600 elevation
    Copyright: © Ostozhenka
  • zooming
    10 / 14
    “Garden Quarters” housing complex. Quarter 2, buildings 2.7-2.10. Plan of the 3rd floor at +7.200 elevation
    Copyright: © Ostozhenka
  • zooming
    11 / 14
    “Garden Quarters” housing complex. Quarter 2, buildings 2.7-2.10. Plan of the 4th floor at +10.800 elevation
    Copyright: © Ostozhenka
  • zooming
    12 / 14
    “Garden Quarters” housing complex. Quarter 2, buildings 2.7-2.10
    Copyright: © Ostozhenka
  • zooming
    13 / 14
    “Garden Quarters” housing complex. Quarter 2, buildings 2.7-2.10
    Copyright: © Ostozhenka
  • zooming
    14 / 14
    “Garden Quarters” housing complex. Quarter 2, buildings 2.7-2.10. Cross-section 2-2
    Copyright: © Ostozhenka


The lobby interiors, which in the “Garden Quarters” were designed by the authors of each building – tall, two-story spaces – in this case, like the façades, balance on the edge between resonating with the neighbors and making their own statement.

Firstly, all the lobbies feature golden triangles – a motif that feels like a symbol of our time. However, the architects do not use these triangles to create flexible forms, limiting them to a background element on the walls. Some of the triangles are smooth, while others are textured, echoing the treatment of the façades, where limestone is rough (honed) on the main surface and smooth (polished) on the reveals. Interestingly, the polished reveals are darker, revealing cuts of prehistoric shells.

“Garden Quarters” housing complex. Quarter 2, buildings 2.7-2.10
Copyright: © Ostozhenka


“The main idea of the lobby interiors was to connect all the lobbies with a “golden ribbon”” says Ksenia Berdnikova, the chief architect of the project.

Indeed, the entrance areas are spacious frames with glass walls, their spaces, especially in the evening, glowing with a warm golden light. The stone from the façades continues inside, and black elements echo the black inserts outside; however, in the interior, their role is more active rather than just a background.

zooming
The first sketch of the entrance groups. “Garden Quarters” housing complex. Quarter 2, buildings 2.7-2.10
Copyright: © Ostozhenka


  • zooming
    “Garden Quarters” housing complex. Quarter 2, buildings 2.7-2.10
    Copyright: Photograph © Daniel Annenkov / provided by Ostozhenka
  • zooming
    “Garden Quarters” housing complex. Quarter 2, buildings 2.7-2.10
    Copyright: Photograph © Daniel Annenkov / provided by Ostozhenka


The most striking element in the lobby of the “Ostozhenka” building is the black spiral staircase – an eternal, nearly timeless method for organizing space in a dramatic fashion.

  • zooming
    “Garden Quarters” housing complex. Quarter 2, buildings 2.7-2.10
    Copyright: © Ostozhenka
  • zooming
    The lobby project. “Garden Quarters” housing complex. Quarter 2, buildings 2.7-2.10
    Copyright: © Ostozhenka


Thus, both signature buildings, one designed by Reserve Union and the other by Ostozhenka, mark the culmination of an 18-year-long saga of constructing the iconic residential complex in the heart of Moscow’s elite Khamovniki district. This complex has become a core, a kind of “spine”, both conceptually and plastically, in the history of Moscow residential construction over the past decades and within the city’s urban landscape. It is definitely a highlight by any standards. The two signature buildings bring this saga to a close – each in its own way. They conclude it by conversing with each other while maintaining their distinct characters and individual expressions.

In this architectural dialogue, the “Ostozhenka” building plays a more communicative role.


26 August 2024

Headlines now
Resort on the Kama River
Wowhaus has developed a project for the reconstruction of Korabelnaya Roshcha (“Mast Grove”), a wellness resort located on the banks of the Kama River.
Nests in Primorye
The eco-park project “Nests”, designed by Aleksey Polishchuk and the company Power Technologies, received first prize at the Eco-Coast 2025 festival, organized by the Union of Architects of Russia. For a glamping site in Filinskaya Bay, the authors proposed bird-shaped houses, treehouses, and a nest-shaped observation platform, topping it all with an entrance pavilion executed in the shape of an owl.
The Angle of String Tension
The House of Music, designed by Vladimir Plotkin and the architects of TPO Reserve, resembles a harp, and when seen from above, even a bass clef. But if only it were that simple! The architecture of the complex fuses two distinct expressive languages: the lattice-like, transparent, permeable vocabulary of “classical” modernism and the sculptural, ribbon-like volumes so beloved by today’s neo-modernism. How it all works – where the catharsis lies, which compositional axes underpin the design, where the project resembles Zaryadye Concert Hall and where it does not – read in the article below.
How Historic Tobolsk Becomes a Portal to the Future
Over the past decade, the architectural company Wowhaus has developed urban strategies for several Russian cities – Vyksa, Tula, and Nizhnekamsk, to name but a few. Against this backdrop, the Tobolsk master plan stands out both for its scale – the territory under transformation covers more than 220 square kilometers – and for its complexity.
St. Petersburg vs Rome
The center of St. Petersburg is, as we know, sacred – but few people can say with certainty where this “sacred place” actually begins and ends. It’s not about the formal boundaries, “from the Obvodny Canal to the Bolshaya Nevka”, but about the vibe that feels true to the city center. With the Nevskaya Ratusha complex – built to a design that won an international competition – Evgeny Gerasimov and Sergei Tchoban created an “image of the center” within its territory. And not so much the image of St. Petersburg itself, as that of a global metropolis. This is something new, something that hasn’t appeared in the city for a long time. In this article, we study the atmosphere, recall precedents, and even reflect on who and when first called St. Petersburg the “new Rome”. Clearly, the idea is alive for a reason.
On the Wave
The project of transforming the river port and embankment in the city of Cheboksary, developed by the ATRIUM Architects, involves one of the city’s key areas. The Volga embankment is to be turned into a riverside boulevard – a multifunctional, comfortable, and expressive space for work and leisure activities. The authors propose creating a new link with the city’s main Krasnaya (“Red”) Square, as well as erecting several residential towers inspired by the shape of the traditional national women’s headdress – these towers are likely to become striking accents on the Volga panorama.
Valery Kanyashin: “We Were Given a Free Hand”
The Headliner residential complex, the main part of which was recently completed just across from Moscow City, is a kind of neighbor to the MIBC that doesn’t “play along” with it. On the contrary, the new complex is entirely built on contrast: like a city of differently scaled buildings that seems to have emerged naturally over the past 20 years – which is a hugely popular trend nowadays! And yet here – perhaps only here – such a project has been realized to its full potential. Yes, high-rises dominate, but all these slender, delicate profiles, all these exciting perspectives! And most importantly – how everything is mixed and composed together... We spoke with the project’s leader Valery Kanyashin.
​The Keystone
Until quite recently, premium residential and office complexes in Moscow were seen as the exclusive privilege of the city center. Today the situation is changing: high-quality architecture is moving beyond the confines of the Third Ring Road and appearing on the outskirts. The STONE Kaluzhskaya business center is one such example. Projects like this help decentralize the megalopolis, making life and work prestigious in any part of the city.
Perpetuum Mobile
The interior of the headquarters of Natsproektstroy, created by the IND studio team, vividly and effectively reflects the client’s field of activity – it is one of Russia’s largest infrastructure companies, responsible for logistics and transport communications of every kind you can possibly think of.
Water and Light
Church art is full of symbolism, and part of it is truly canonical, while another part is shaped by tradition and is perceived by some as obligatory. Because of this kind of “false conservatism”, contemporary church architecture develops slowly compared to other genres, and rarely looks contemporary. Nevertheless, there are enthusiasts in this field out there: the cemetery church of Archangel Michael in Apatity, designed by Dmitry Ostroumov and Prokhram bureau, combines tradition and experiment. This is not an experiment for its own sake, however – rather, the considered work of a contemporary architect with the symbolism of space, volume, and, above all, light.
Champions’ Cup
At first glance, the Bell skyscraper on 1st Yamskogo Polya Street, 12, appears strict and laconic – though by no means modest. Its economical stereometry is built on a form close to an oval, one of UNK architects’ favorite themes. The streamlined surface of the main volume, clad in metal louvers, is sliced twice with glass incisions that graphically reveal the essence of the original shape: both its simplicity and its complexity. At the same time, dozens of highly complex engineering puzzles have been solved here.
Semi-Digital Environment
In the town of Innopolis, a satellite of Kazan, the first 4-star hotel designed by MAD Architects has opened. The interiors of the hotel combine elegance with irony, and technology with comfort, evoking the atmosphere of a computer game or maybe a sci-fi movie about the near future.
History never ends
The old railway station in Kapan, a city in southern Armenia, has been given new life by the Paris-based design firm Normal Studio. Today, it serves as a TUMO center.
A Deep, Crystal Shine
A new luxury residential development by ADM architects is set to rise in the Patriarch’s Ponds district, not far from Novopushkinsky Square. It will replace three buildings erected in the early 1990s. The project authors, Andrey Romanov and Ekaterina Kuznetsova, have placed their bets on the variety among the three volumes, modern design solutions, and attention to detail: one of the buildings will feature smoothly curved balconies with a ceramic sheen on their undersides, while another will be accented by glass “sculpture” columns.
Grigory Revzin: “What we should do with the architecture of the seventies”
Soviet modernism came in two flavors: the good, author-driven kind, and the bad, standardized kind. The good kind was “on the periphery”, while the bad kind was in the center – geographically, in terms of attention, scale, and everything else. Can we demolish it? “That would be destroying public consensus out of thin air”. So what should we do? Preserve it, but creatively: “Bring architecture into places where it hasn’t yet appeared”. Treat these buildings not as monuments, but as urban landscape. Read our interview with Grigory Revzin on the pressing topic of saving modernism – where he proposes a controversial, yet really intriguing, way of preserving 1970s buildings.
A Roadside Picnic of Urban Planning Theorists
Marina Egorova, head of Empate Architectural Bureau, brought together urban planning theorists – the successors of Alexey Gutnov and Vyacheslav Glazychev – to revive the substance and depth of professional discourse. At the first meeting, much ground was covered: the participants revisited the theoretical foundations, aligned their values, examined a cutting-edge case of the Kazan agglomeration, and concluded with the unfathomable intricacies of Russian land demarcation. Below, we present key takeaways from all the presentations.
Perspective View
CNTR Architects has designed a business center for a new district in Yekaterinburg, aiming to reduce the need for commuting and make the residential environment more diverse. The architectural solutions are equally focused on creating spatial flexibility, comfortable working conditions, and a memorable image that could allow the building to become a spatial landmark of the district.
Malevich and Bathhouses, Nature and High-Tech
The Malevich Bathhouse complex is scheduled to open in the fall of 2025 on the Rublyovo-Uspenskoye Highway. The project, designed by DBA-GROUP under the leadership of Vladislav Andreev, is an example of an unconventional approach to the image of a spa in general and of a bathhouse in particular. Deliberately avoiding any kind of allusion, the architects opted for streamlined forms with characteristic rounded corners, a combination of wood with bent glass, and restrained contemporary shapes – both inside and out. Let’s take a closer look at the project.
Rather, a Tablecloth and a Glass!
After many years, the long-abandoned Horse Guards Department building in St. Petersburg has finally received the attention it deserves: according to a design by Studio 44, the first restoration and adaptation works are scheduled to begin this year. Both the intended function and the general scope of works imply minimal alteration to the complex, which has preserved traces of its three-century history. All solutions are reversible and aimed, above all, at opening the monument to the city and immersing it in a lively social scene – hence the choice of a cultural center scenario with a strong gastronomic component.
​Materialization of Airflows
The Nikolai Kamov International Airport in Tomsk opened at the end of August last year. We have already written about the project – now we are taking a look at the completed building. Its functionality is reinforced by symbolic undertones: the architects at ASADOV sought to reflect local identity in the architecture as fully as possible.
The City as a Narrative
Sergey Skuratov’s approach to large urban plots could best be described as a “total design code”. The architect pays equal attention to the overall composition and the smallest of details, striving to ensure that every aspect is thoroughly thought out and subordinated to the original vision. It’s a Renaissance-like approach, really – a titanic effort demanding remarkable willpower and perseverance. The results are likewise grand – architecture that makes a statement. This article looks at the revived concept for the central section of the Seventh Heaven residential district in Kazan, a composition so thoroughly considered that even the “gradient of visual emphasis” (sic!) across the facades has been carefully worked out. It also touches on the narrative idea behind the project – and even the architect’s own doubts about it.
A Garden of Hope for Freedom
In October, at the Spaso-Evfimiev Monastery in Suzdal, the Prison Yard Garden opened on the site that had served as a prison from the 18th century until the Khrushchev Thaw. The architectural concept was developed by NOῨD Short Film, and the landscape design by the MOX landscape bureau. In fact, there are two gardens here – very different ones. We try to understand whether they evoke the right emotions in visitors, while also showing the beauty of June’s ruderal plants in bloom.
A Laconic Image of Time
The Time Square residential complex, built on the northern edge of St. Petersburg, appears more concise and efficient than its neighbor and predecessor, the New Time complex. Nevertheless, the architect’s hand is clearly felt: themes of “black and white”, “inside and outside”, and most notably, the “lamellar” quality of the facades that seems to visibly “eat away” at the buildings’ mass – everything is played out like a well-written score. One is reminded of both classical modernism and the so-called “post-constructivism”.
The Flower of the Lake
The prototype for the building of the Kamal Theater in Kazan is an ice flower: a rare and fragile natural phenomenon of Lake Kaban “froze” in the large, soaring outlines of the glass screens enclosing the main volume, shaping its silhouette and shielding the stained-glass windows from the sun. The project, led by the Wowhaus consortium and including global architecture “star” Kengo Kuma, won the 2021/2022 competition and was realized close to the original concept in a short – very short – period of time. The theater opened in early 2025. It was Kengo Kuma who proposed the image of an ice flower and the contraposition of cold on the outside and warmth on the inside. Between 2022 and 2024, Wowhaus did everything possible to bring this vision to life, practically living on-site. Now we are taking a closer look at this landmark building and its captivating story.
Peaceful Integration on Mira Avenue
The MIRA residential complex (the word mir means “peace” in Russian), perched above the steep banks of the Yauza River and Mira Avenue, lives up to its name not only technically, but also visually and conceptually. Sleek, high-rise, and glass-clad, it responds both to Zholtovsky’s classicism and to the modernism of the nearby “House on Stilts”. Drawing on features from its neighbors, it reconciles them within a shared architectural language rooted in contemporary façade design. Let’s take a closer look at how this is done.
An Interior for a New Format of Education
The design of the new building for Tyumen State University (TyumSU) was initially developed before the pandemic but later revised to meet new educational requirements. The university has adopted a “2+2+2” system, which eliminates traditional divisions into groups and academic streams in favor of individualized study programs. These changes were implemented swiftly – right at the start of construction. Now that the building is complete, we are taking a closer look.
Penthouses and Kokoshniks
A new residential complex designed by ASADOV Architects for the Krasnaya Roza business district responds to its proximity to 17th-century landmarks – the chambers of the Hamovny Dvor and St. Nicholas Church – as well as to the need to preserve valuable façades of a historic rental house built in the Russian Revival style. The architects proposed a set of buildings of varying heights, whose façades reference ecclesiastical architecture. But we were also able to detect other associations.
Centipede Town
The new school campus designed by ATRIUM Architects, located on the shores of a protected lake in the Imeretian Lowland Ornithological Reserve, represents an important and ambitious undertaking for the team: this is not just a school, but a Presidential Lyceum for the comprehensive development of gifted children – 2,500 students from age 3 through high school. At the same time, it is also envisioned as a new civic hub for the entire Sirius territory. In this article, we unpack the structure and architecture of this “lyceum town”.
Warm Black and White
The second phase of “Quarter 31”, designed by KPLN and built in the Moscow suburb town of Pushkino, reveals a multifaceted character. At first glance, the complex appears to be defined by geometry and a monochrome palette. But a closer look reveals a number of “irregular” details: a gradient of glazing and flared window frames, a hierarchy of façades, volumetric brickwork, and even architectural references to natural phenomena. We explore all the rules – and exceptions – that we were able to discover here.