Vladimir Bindeman: "An urbanist's mission is making a positive difference in people's lives".

Archi.ru:

- It's been almost two years since the exhibition dedicated to the tenth anniversary of Arkhitekturium. What are you working on now?

Vladimir Bindeman:

- Today, we mostly do architectural proposals and concepts, and we are also finishing the Novgorod cluster. Due to the economic situation, the number of investors that are ready to out and actually switch over from concept to implementation has significantly shrunk, but still, some attempts are made out there. Of what we started, we are now finishing the construction of the "Andersen" area in the New Moscow, and the residential complex "Opalikha-Village" in the town of Krasnogorsk.

zooming — Vladimir Bindeman © Arkhitekturium

- How is the environment changing in the area of out-of-town residential construction? What new challenges are the designers faced with?

- Just as expected, the tough competition environment dictates cutting costs, and, consequently, simplification. The developers are trying to make up for their objective losses with reducing their production self-cost as much as possible. At the same time, the urban planning situation in the Moscow area, that has been over the recent years going from bad to worse under the burden of the unbalanced mass residential construction, have come today to a number of critical points, mainly in its transportation and social aspects. The decision of the government of the Moscow region about a moratorium on the residential construction in the suburban cities of Balashikha and Korolev, and about the suspension of it in the town of Khimki really proves that we've hit a crisis here. As far as the goals and plans are concerned, it is kind of embarrassing to speak of new ones. What our town planning needs is solving the old issues in the first place - making up for the "contract empty spaces" of the recent years when it comes to schools and kindergartens, social projects, and parking lots that are meant to be there by default but which were blithely forgotten the moment the residential property itself was sold. The question remains, however, who will do this, where, and who will pay for it. In 2016, the government of the Moscow Region is expected to ratify 238 documents on territory planning; at the same time, in about 300 federation subjects, the master plans have not been approved yet. The final approval of these settlement master plans is, of course, meant to put some regulations on the functional zones, and prevent further juggling the land from "agricultural" to "residential" and vice versa, but we know from experience that there is a long way to go from good intentions to actual practical results.

- What are the main challenges that you have to deal with when designing out-of-town settlements? How do you go about communicating with your customers? Which issues get negotiated over most of all?

- What the customer always wants is make a silk purse out of a sow's ear. This is the objective truth, there are practically no exceptions to it. When you make feeble attempts to refer to construction rules and regulations, let alone such abstract and ethereal notion as "composition", these are always crushed by the will of the collective body (board of directors or shareholders). The only obstacle that can hold them back is a real prospect of getting no approval from the appropriate authorities. Realizing that changing this situation is, regretfully, beyond our power, in each of our projects we still try to fight for the public spaces and functions, trying to create boulevards, parks, and squares.

- It seems like nature itself is helping us. Most of our projects have been built on the sites running along rivers or situated next to lakes that have the water protection zones where you simply cannot build. This is why we have been able to build riverside promenades with recreation spaces and public venues. And, wherever the situation is different from what I've just described, we propose to make what we call "green breaks" between the houses - and we try to orient as many windows as possible to these green zones. It is understood that the economic situation is challenging but, at the same time, the market of real estate is also saturated. In order to get an edge, the developer must take care about the attractiveness factors of what he's selling, must create an environment that is comfortable to live in - not only inside the apartment but also outside of it.

- If, like you many times said, townhouses for you are a past stage, then what typology of residential buildings is the most interesting to you today, and why?

- We do projects of integrated territory development - because this is what is interesting for us today. The multistory typology that dominates today's construction is something that is 100% dictated by the market situation. As for us, we lean towards the low-rise and medium-height residential buildings, all the more so in the realities of the Moscow area where most new construction sites are located exactly next to the low-rise stuff - dachas or cottages. To my mind, an optimum Moscow area residential quarter must be from three to six stories high, eight at the very maximum. Of course, in a specific town-planning situation there's nothing wrong with including high-rise centerpieces as your landmarks; it's something that you even have to do. But this is also something quite different from the 17-story "prison" closed-perimeter monsters with faceless standards interiors. If we are to go back to the subject of townhouses, then it's quite possible that the developers will be showing interest to them again, only in a different format. Of course, nobody will build 250-300 square meter sections today but the alternative to the regular city apartments, the so-called "apartments on the ground" with an area below 100 square meters - quite possible. And such attempts are already being made.

- What are your stylistic preferences, and how often are you able to tie them in with the context?

- The most difficult question you can ask an architect is "What style do you work in?" Especially today! We allow of no vulgar stylizations; we do modern architecture, and we try to do it with expression. Our context is mostly the natural environment, and this is why we try to find solutions that help us to fit in as gracefully as we can with the surrounding landscape.

- Are there any projects that you did that you can call your favorite ones or "milestones" in your career?

- During our "villa" period, I built the "Yacht" house, and "Krasny Klin" ("Red Wedge"), as well as the "terrace" resort in Sochi in 2014. These projects did not go unnoticed. They also had great customers, great decision makers. Out of today's projects, I could name the Novogorsk project and "Andersen" residential complex where we were able, albeit with some losses, to implement our idea of several quarters different in their architecture. Developing nine sections of typical layouts, we then made the challenge still more interesting and introduced variability of their façades, depending on which section is used in which quarter. This is how on the 19-hectare area "Andersen" got "red", "white", "mosaic", and "striped" quarters, and a fee combinations of them.

- What, in your opinion, is the main difference between working in Moscow and in the regions. How does the proximity of this or that regional center influence the project?

- I think that in this digital Information Age the very notion of "region" is rapidly losing its original meaning. No architects now consider the "remoteness" as a critical factor, reserving sophisticated projects for the capital cities and leaving more simple projects for the provinces. Rather, this is a mistake that the developers make, applying standard methods for defining the class of this or that project (more expensive - less expensive). Great architecture is "appropriate" anywhere, it pays respect to the specifics of the place, and this is what actually makes it great, among other things. The town of Sestroretsk, for example, has been included today in the city boundaries of Saint Petersburg, and we treated that project as a task of creating a European-class suburban town that is a great place to live in. We wanted to show how one can make a great residential area of city-type townhouses - two-story houses without land plots forming quarters of various layouts. We took the planning grid that is characteristic for Saint Petersburg and inscribed into it a city square decorated by a public and shopping center and a school building. Next to the school, we made a cute little "summer garden". In our planning structure, we found a place for two blocks of "city" townhouses with small land plots (but with no fences!). Along the streets, we planted strings of ball-shaped lime trees that separate the parallel parking spots from the bicycle lanes... With all due modesty, what we ultimately got was a "dream" city with paved sidewalks, corner stores or cafes at the corners of the blocks. But so far the dream remains a dream - probably, the town is not ready for such projects yet.

- What do you think of architectural contests?

- I think they are a great thing; it's just saddening that we don't always get a chance to take part in them. What is interesting about the true contest is the fact that you don't have to care about the customer's opinion in the course of work. You do a project that solely reflects your personal vision of the task that you get to do, and you submit it to the contest substantiating it with the proof that your solution is best one. And from that moment on, it's a matter of coincidence and the match between the judging panel's and the architect's outlook. And as for the open contests, they are a whole separate subject to talk about. You never quite understand the organizer's attitude or his real intentions - but you can go as crazy as you like and get your fill. As for the closed contests, however, the ones that pay the architects for the sole fact of participating therein, the situation is still more complex here. One of such recent contests stipulated a condition of mandatory intermediate showcases for all the participants and coordinating all the intermediate stages without which you could not go on. The customer wanted "to be in the loop" so as to avoid getting an unpredictable result for his hard-earned money.

- What was interesting to you about the Nizhny Novgorod contest?

- First of all, the task itself. At the first stage, one was to propose a concept of developing a 450-hectare territory in the south part of town. This is a very big chunk of land, and not only by the Nizhny Novgorod standards. The task was made even more complex by the prominent terrain and the numerous power lines that crossed the land site. We proposed a planning structure that was based on the four major districts connected with city highways and situated along two recreation and landscape axes. Each district had a nucleus of its own; there was a thought-out system of public green areas set by the terrain curves. The town-planning paradigm was based on the hierarchical principle: from the private space of the apartment to the neighbors' space of the yard to the public space of the street, city square, and park. In the second round of the contest, we proposed to develop these ideas at the example of one of the four areas with detailed elaboration of residential and public projects.

- What is going on now in Novogorsk Olympic Village?

- Novogorsk is a cluster that consists of three venues that are located in the immediate proximity of one another. The main venue, the one it all started from, is already functioning. It includes townhouses, two multi-apartment residential buildings, and a multifunctional sports and community center, the decoration of which is now being finished. The venue that is situated further down the Skhodnya River, called "Novogorsk Olympic Village. Apartments", is also being populated now, the people who moved in are having their decoration jobs done. We hope that in May the organization of the territory inside the block and along the embankment will be completed, and the complex will look like it was originally supposed to. And the third venue - "Novogorsk Olympic Village. Resort" - is now in the phase of finishing the façades and the landscaping work.

- Please share about the concept of "Villagio" residential area.

- We got down to this project with a lot of enthusiasm, and soon we had a perfect understanding with our customer. As is known, Villagio is a settlement with rather large villas and townhouses. This project also provided for developing the territory adjacent to the Novorizhskoe Highway where mid-rise residential houses were supposed to be built, with the entire appropriate infrastructure.

The proximity to the highway defined the main planning idea of the area - we had to protect the residential property from the highway noise by placing linear infrastructure projects along the Novorizhskoe Highway: a shopping and office center and parking lots. These buildings, in turn, are separated from the residential area by the main shopping street with a broad pedestrian boulevard. The entire residential area is divided into four blocks standing at a small angle in respect to one another - which results in "green wedges" - the landscaped pedestrian zones with gazebos, benches, flowerbeds, and creeks. We singled out all the "correct" components of the block planning - the Main Street with a system of small triangular squares, residential streets that provide entrances to the hallways and underground parking garages, inter-block "green breaks", and semi-closed landscaped car-free yards.

- Looking at the plans of the settlements designed by your company one might think that you were inclined toward the "block" principle before it ever came into fashion. Is it true?

- Yes, I have always thought that a populated area (be that a city, a town, or a village, whatever) must have in it a certain hierarchy of spaces, and, hence, their diversity. The block planning is something that was formed for centuries bearing in it the specifics of each region: climatic, geographic, and national. In the antique city of Priene, the official ancient-Greece orthogonal planning is "stretched" over the picturesque hills. This is something that looks pretty impressive even today when there is nothing but the foundations left. An analogous example is San-Francisco. The amorphous quality of the "micro-district" space has long since outlived itself, distorting, over the period of its reigning, such basic notions as "yard", "street", and "square". Unfortunately, in this field we got "ahead of the whole planet", "blessing" the entire country with this micro-district planning. What gives me hope, though, is the fact that the vector of development has changed now. However, in this new reality you cannot fall hostage of mainstream. Any specific town-planning situation contains a lot of factors that influence your choice of solutions, and forcing the "block" or "quarter" principle on every project would be equally wrong.

- Practically each of your projects has in it some bright object that can be called the visiting card of this project. What part does it play in the overall composition?

- Exactly the one you've just named - the role of its visiting card. In the projects of "Novoarkhangelsk" and "Rizhsky Quarter", these are the community centers with large-span drive-through arches in them. In Novogorsk, it is the multifunctional public and sports center itself, with its wavy roof. In the Sestroretsk project, it was going to be a "city tower" with a neat glass clock on top of it. Such projects are really important in residential areas, and we always pay special attention to their design.

- Do you think architecture can ultimately shape people's lifestyle, and do you try to achieve this in your projects?

- The Corbusier question: "Architecture or Revolution?" The free market economy, of course, does not go well together with the "messiah" lifestyle-shaping ideas, but still, everyone knows that "being determines consciousness". Just what is a "lifestyle"? Very simply put, it is a set of habitual actions that a person does every day, every month, or every year, and the emotions that he gets as a result of these actions. Do you take your kids to school in the morning struggling through a two-hour-long traffic jam, or do they get to school in ten minutes by a green boulevard? Do you look out the window of you 17-story box at a square space 50 meters high and crowded with cars or at a beautiful car-free yard three-five stories high surrounded by equally beautiful houses? Here are two different lifestyles for you - and two different sets of emotions. Architecture by default must be humane; this is something that is taught at every architectural college or university. However, it is common practice today to make town-planning decisions without asking urbanists and architects first. And as for the industry professionals, the developers often thrust upon them the role of "magicians" who can organize all this in a more or less coherent form that distantly resembles the town-planning rules and regulations. The issues of transport accessibility, the provision of social projects and service infrastructure, the creation of workplaces (a popular thing now, although maybe too-much sales-driven) - it takes a lot of work to tie this in with the old heritage and the achievements of the last two decades. Hence, today's lifestyle that one can hardly call satisfactory. Naturally, we are not the only architects that try to form a comfortable environment in their projects and make a positive difference in the lives of people who live in it, in the way they think. This must be the goal of each urbanist, each architect. Does this goal coincide with the developer's intentions? That's a big question!

16 May 2016

Interviewed by:

Lilya Aronova
Translated by:
Anton Mizonov

Headlines now

Object

Home Base

Working on the new building for Letovo Junior School – opened to students in autumn 2025 in the MSU Valley – the architects of UNK, following the client’s vision, subordinated both façades and interiors to the theme of “home”. Multiple variations of pitched roofs, a city skyline traced across glass balustrades, wooden textures, and a whole series of micro-spaces for retreat within public areas are all at the disposal of primary and middle school students. We take a closer look at the new school building – and at how it interprets current trends in educational environments.

Object

Doubles Match

The architecture of the Tennis Palace built in Luzhniki Olympic Complex, designed by Arena Design Institute, was shaped by three factors: the proximity of the brutalist Druzhba Arena, the closeness of the Moskva River and the metro bridge overpass, as well as the specifics of the function – tennis courts require large spans, abundant light, yet at the same time protection from direct sunlight. The architects divided the building into several blocks, playing on contrast, which is further emphasized by the façades developed in collaboration with TPO Reserve and Vladimir Plotkin.

Object

Microdynamics of Macroprocesses

Given the proximity of the multifunctional complex SOLOS to Sokolniki Park and to a major transport hub, Kleinewelt Architekten embedded in the design of the two high-rise towers a sense of dynamism more characteristic of natural phenomena than of man-made objects. Without the authors’ diagrams, this logic is not easy to decipher, although the eye immediately detects a pattern and tries to grasp it. It seems to us that one tower contains the impulse of a bud about to open, while the other evokes the movement of a lithospheric plate. Let us try to unravel it together.

Report

The Space of Post-Cubism

Sergei Tchoban and Alexandra Sheiner, of Studio CHART, created for the exhibition of “post-cubist” sculpture by Beatrice Sandomirskaya – a talented and even “mainstream” artist, yet almost unknown even to art historians – a space akin to her sculptural language: solidly built, confidently stereometric, and subtly expressive. It curves, emphasizing the mass of the sculpture, envelops the viewer, and guides them from one perspective to another, from a generic “shrine” to a “Madonna”.

Object

The Value of Open Space

For the site near the Barrikadnaya Metro Station, Sergey Skuratov developed five projects between 2020 and 2025. Two of them were ones that won the client’s invitation-only competitions. The fifth was recently selected by the Mayor of Moscow for implementation. The project is vivid and sculptural, expressive, eye-catching, and engaging – very much in line with the spirit of our time. And yet, this project is mid-rise rather than tall. In its northwestern part, near the metro and Druzhinnikovskaya Street, it shapes a comfortable urban environment. On the opposite side, it opens up, allowing sunlight into the courtyard and creating a spatial pause within the dense city fabric. How it is organized, what geometric principles underlie it, and why it takes this form – all this is explored in our article.

Coming From the Cold

The ArchBukhta Festival remains one of the few events in Russia where participants go through the entire process of creating an architectural object – from concept to construction. And they do so on the shores of Lake Baikal, in dedication to it. This year, GAFA took part and shared its experience: a local legend, a team-specific design code, friendship, as well as ice skating and endurance in freezing temperatures all contributed to gaining something more than just an award.

Object

Symphony of Water and Brick

The Alter residential complex, designed by Stepan Liphart and built on a bend of the Okhta River, is an example of a “drawn house”: the number of original architectural details is virtually immeasurable. As a result, ribs, projections, and recesses create a picturesque silhouette even without a significant variation in height. Both composition and material respond to the proximity of the river and to the red-brick factory building dating back to the early 20th century. The project was also significantly shaped by recommendations from the city’s chief architect. More details in our article.

Object

The Penguin House

The building with a curved façade on Brestskaya Street is one of the manifestos of Russian neomodernism of the early 2000s, a sculpture – this is how Anatoly Belov interprets it, speaking of “breaking from the modernist canon and the contextual approach”. We do not fully agree with the author, but his perspective is an interesting one.

Object

Wave and Vertical

The premium residential complex designed by GAFA for a site in the Khoroshevsky District responds to multiple constraints – the arc of a planned roadway, the water protection zone of the Khodynka River, and insolation requirements – through inventive massing. The composition is built on the interplay of two spatial layers: an elongated perimeter block and three towers concealed behind it generate the silhouette and key viewpoints, while also adding semantic depth reinforced by the façade solutions. Another defining feature is a large private courtyard, complemented by a citywide linear park.

Object

Office on Trubnaya

We continue publishing projects by Valery Kanyashin. A building once described, a quarter century ago, as an example of “quiet modernism” has remained just that in some people’s memory. According to Anatoly Belov, its main quality is its unobtrusiveness. The architects from Ostozhenka say the leading role here is played by context and landscape – the change in elevation. Yet is it really so inconspicuous?

Object

The First International

With this publication, we begin a series of texts dedicated to works by the late Valery Kanyashin, one of the founders of Ostozhenka Architects. As it happens, the projects he was involved in largely illustrate our understanding of the firm and its history. The first project in this series is the International Moscow Bank on Prechistenskaya Embankment.

in memoriam

In Memory of Valery Kanyashin

On Friday, February 27, architect Valery Kanyashin passed away – co-founder of Ostozhenka Architects and the author of many significant buildings in Moscow. We publish a text by Anatoly Belov in memory of Valery Kanyashin.

Report

Hypertext in Space

As part of the exhibition “What We Have We (Do Not) Keep”, Sergey Tchoban, the Museum of Architecture, and the CHART studio experiment with an eco-conscious approach to exhibition design, with thematic cross-references and even with publicistic reflections on the necessity of preserving modernism, the roots of contemporary architecture, and the birth of ideas. All of this makes the exhibition, with its light and transparent design, look quite innovative. The elements – both “material” and conceptual – are familiar, yet their combination is far from conventional.

Object

The Outline of “Foundation”

In their competition proposal for the Fili transport hub, the consortium led by Alexey Ilyin proposed an “inhabited arch” – a form that is simple yet complex. The architects emphasize that even at the competition stage, the project’s feasibility was fully calculated, taking into account the minimal nighttime closures of Bagration Avenue. How was this achieved? With what functions? Let us take a closer look. In our view, the building would have suited the heroes of Isaac Asimov’s Foundation novels perfectly.

Object

The Flying Horizontal

“A house in the spirit of Wright”, as architect Roman Leonidov describes it, pointing to his source of inspiration, was built on a challenging wedge-shaped site. To achieve a sense of intimacy and secure good views from the windows, the entire volume had to be shifted toward the far boundary, turning the house “back” to the neighboring mansions. The main façade demonstrates time-tested techniques often employed by the company: articulated horizontals, a weightless roofline, and a triad of materials – light plaster, dark slate, and warm wood.

Object

Needles of Horizon Contemplation

The “House of Horizons”, designed by Kleinewelt Architekten in Krylatskoye, is carefully thought out at the stereometric level – from the logic of how the volumes interlock (and, conversely, how gaps are articulated between them) to the triangular balconies that give the building its striking, slightly bristling silhouette.

News

The Red Thread

A linear park project prepared by Alexey Ilyin studio for the improvement of a riverbank in one of the residential districts seeks to reconnect people with nature. Two levels of the embankment invite visitors to contemplate the landscape while at the same time protecting the riverbank from excessive human impact. The “aerial street” links functional zones and the opposite banks, creating new points of attraction along the way: balconies, bridges, and even a “grotto”.

Object

Spindle and Thread

The concept of the Waver residential complex in Yekaterinburg draws inspiration from the past of the Parkovy district. In order to preserve the memory of the late-19th-century flax spinning mill once located here, the architectural company KPLN turns to the theme of textiles and weaving. The project’s main expressive device is a system of ribbons made of perforated weathering steel – a material that, in such volumes, has arguably not yet been used in Russian residential projects.

Overview

From Ski Resorts to Year-Round Recreation Clusters

In mid-December, several architectural firms gathered to discuss a “seasonal” topic: the prospects for the development of domestic ski tourism. Where is modern infrastructure already in place, where do only remnants of the Soviet legacy remain, and where is there still nothing – but projects are underway and soon to be completed? This article explores these questions.

Object

Woven Into Sokolniki

Over the past few years, high-rise residential construction in former industrial zones has become the main theme of Moscow architecture. Towers are springing up here and there – but the question is what kind of towers they are. The residential complex CODE Sokolniki, designed by Ostozhenka Architects, is a project where every detail has been taken care of. The authors are attentive to the history of the site, the continuity of the urban fabric, the skyline, and visual corridors. They also proposed a motif with the lyrical name “scarf”. We take a closer look at the volumetric composition and the large-scale décor “woven”, in this case, out of terraces and balconies.

Interview

Stepan Liphart and Yuri Gerth: “Our Program Is Aesthetic”

The studio of Stepan Liphart, an architect known for his distinctive signature style and one-off projects, now has a partner. Yuri Khitrov, a specialist with a broad range of competencies, will take on the part of the work that distracts one from creativity but drives the business forward. One of the aims of this partnership is to improve the urban environment through dialogue with clients and officials. We spoke with both sides about their ambitions, the firm’s development strategy, shared values, and the need for pragmatism. And why the studio is called “Liphart & Gerth” only became clear at the very end of the interview.

Object

The Copper Mirror

The varied-toned sheen of “unsealed” copper, painterly streaks and fingerprints, exposed concrete, and the unusual proportions – when you study the ZILART Museum building by Sergei Tchoban and SPEECH architects, there is plenty to talk about. However, it seems to us that the most interesting thing is how the museum’s composition responds to the realities of the district itself. The residential district has been realized as an open-air exhibition of façade statements by contemporary architects – but without public access to the inner courtyards of the blocks. This building – that is, the museum – is exactly the opposite: on the outside, it is deliberately restrained, while inside it shines spectacularly, creating its own sunbeams in any weather.

View

“Strangers” in the City

We asked Alexander Skokan for a comment on the results of 2025 – and he sent us a whole article, moreover one devoted to the discussion we recently began on the “appropriateness of high-rises” – or, more broadly speaking, “contrasting insertions into the urban fabric”. The result is a text that is essentially a question: why here? Why like this?

Interview

Dmitry Ostroumov: “To use the language of alchemy, we are involved in the process of “transmutation...

What we ended up having was an extremely unusual conversation with Dmitry Ostroumov. Why? At the very least, because he is not just an architect specializing in the construction of Orthodox churches. And not just – which is an extreme rarity – a proponent of developing contemporary stylistics within this still highly conservative field. Dmitry Ostroumov is a Master of Theology. So in addition to the history and specifics of the company, we speak about the very concept of the temple, about canon and tradition, about the living and the eternal, and even about the Russian Logos.

Interview

MB-PROJECT: “Every new project is a challenge”

In this issue, we speak with Dmitry and Oleg Shurygin, founders of the company MV-PROJECT, which has extensive experience in designing theater and entertainment buildings as well as working with cultural heritage sites.

Object

A Glazed Figurine

In searching for an image for a residential building near the Novodevichy Convent, GAFA architects turned to their own perception of the place: it evoked associations with antiquity, plein-air painting, and vintage artifacts. The two towers will be entirely clad in volumetric glazed ceramic – at present, there are no other buildings like this in Russia. The complex will also stand out thanks to its metabolic bay-window cells, streamlined surfaces, a ceremonial “hotel-style” driveway, and a lobby overlooking a lush garden.

Report

A Knight’s Move via the Cour d’Honneur

Intercolumnium Architects presented to the City Planning Council a residential complex project that is set to replace the Aquatoria business center on Vyborgskaya Embankment. Experts praised the overall quality of the work, but expressed reservations about the three cour d’honneurs and suggested softening the contrast between the facades facing the embankment and the Kantemirovsky Bridge.

Object

Mountains, Groves, and Ancestral Towers

The year-round mountain resort Armkhi situated in Russia’s Republic of Ingushetia is positioned as a destination for calm family recreation and has well-established traditions shaped by its hundred-year history and the culture of the region. The development program prepared by the Genplan Institute of Moscow preserves the resort’s identity while expanding its offerings and introducing new types of tourist leisure. In the near future, the resort will feature a balneological center, a thermal complex, an interactive museum, an extreme park, and, of course, new ski slopes.

Object

A Small Country

Mezonproekt is developing a long-term master plan for the MEPhI campus in Obninsk. Over the next ten years, an enclave territory of about 100 hectares, located in a forest on the northern edge of the city, is set to transform into a modern center for the development of the nuclear energy sector. The plan envisions attracting international students and specialists, as well as comprehensive territorial development: both through the contemporary realization of “frozen” plans from the 1980s and through the introduction of new trends – public spaces, an aquapark, a food court, a school, and even a nuclear medicine center. Public and sports facilities are intended to be accessible to city residents as well, and the campus is to be physically and functionally connected to Obninsk.

Object

Pearl Divers

GAFA has designed an apartment complex for Derbent intended to switch people from a work mode to a resort mindset – and to give the surrounding area a much-needed jolt. The building offers two distinct faces: restrained and laconic on the city side, and a lushly ornate façade facing the sea. At the heart of the complex, a hidden pearl lies – an open-air pool with an arch, offering views of a starry sky, and providing direct access to the beach.

Vladimir Bindeman: "An urbanist's mission is making a positive difference in people's lives".

An interview with the leader of "Arkhitekturium" Bureau about the urban planning situation in the Moscow area, regional specifics of the quarter planning, and help coming from nature in the cause of "humanizing" the out-of-town construction.