The stadium itself had appeared in the 1920s on the site of the filled-in Middle Pond on the Presnya River. Today, only the ponds of the Moscow Zoo remain; notably, the pavilion of the Krasnopresnenskaya Station on the circular line stands where the pond once was. The new high-end residential complex is being built 150 meters south of the metro entrance, between three prominent 20th-century landmarks – the White House (also known as the Government House), the COMECON Building, and the Kudrinskaya Square High-rise.
There are, in fact, many striking urban panoramas here: the site lies on a slope, on the high bank at a bend of the Moscow River, from which the city seems to unfold dramatically. This advantageous location is its first defining feature.
The second is that this is not just “another residential building with a sports facility”. Since the site inherits the legacy of the stadium, from the very beginning of the design process – around 2019 – it was intended to “preserve the function”, incorporating a significant number of new sports facilities. Above all, a new ice arena. In the final design, sports functions actually dominate, exceeding residential space by 10%. Meanwhile, the sports facilities include: two ice arenas of 2,135 square meters each, with interior heights of over 8 meters; six padel courts totaling 1,262 square meters, a sports complex with 25- and 50-meter swimming pools; a yoga center; and, finally, a football center with heated locker rooms and an open, heated field located on the roof of the underground stylobate, on the side facing the White House.
In functional – and likely marketing – terms, the project fully lives up to its name, “House of Sports”. For anyone who would like their children to grow up as athletes without spending hours commuting to professional training facilities, such a complex would be an ideal fit. More broadly, an active lifestyle centered not just on fitness but on sports as such is said to be increasingly popular today.
At the same time, it would be misleading to imagine this as a sports complex with housing merely “attached” to it. The second part of the name – “house” – is equally justified. The sports facilities are largely concealed underground, making use of the site’s changes in elevation. They are lit partly by lateral glazing and partly by rooflights, whose circular glass apertures are clearly visible on the stylobate roof. Along the wide Konyushkovskaya Street, the stylobate acts as a “frame”, defining the street edge; along Druzhinnikovskaya Street, it becomes a “plinth”, a base level that unifies the row of residential buildings above.
The result is a mid-rise urban fabric which, together with the five- and nine-story buildings opposite, will shape the section of Druzhinnikovskaya Street closest to the Barrikadnaya Metro Station.
With the sports functions hidden, the city emerges – but not a high-rise one, as is more typical today. Given the value of the site, one might reasonably have expected several towers comparable in height to those of the nearby SkyView Residential Complex, built on the site of the former Solovey cinema by TsLP. Those towers rise to roughly twice the height – around 20 stories, over 70 meters.
“House of Sports”, Druzhinnikovskaya 18; project, 2025
Copyright: © Sergey Skuratov Architects / Capital Group
By contrast, the residential buildings of the “House of Sports” reach 35 meters, and the office building 30 meters. The project creates a pause in the urban fabric. When asked whether there had been a height restriction, the architect explains that such a limit did exist in 2020, though it was later lifted. However, the client – Capital Group – chose not to revise the original height decisions, resulting in a rare – very rare today – example of a calm, human-scale urban environment.
Two more qualities make the project exceptional: its urban presence and its mid-rise scale.
Now, a word from the architect, Sergey Skuratov:
It seems to me that the value of this place lies in its openness – in this quality of air and long views that is so rare for Moscow, in these generous pauses between quite powerful urban landmarks. And it was very important not to spoil this condition with excessive mass or arbitrary height. That is why from the outset we pursued a rather restrained approach: we kept the height moderate, and simply placed the main sports volume underground so that the space above could remain at grade, open and free. In the latest version, the project became more animated, more sculptural – at times even more emotional – but for me it was important that it did not lose its internal discipline and, I would say, this sense of respect for the place itself.
“House of Sports”, Druzhinnikovskaya 18; project, 2025
Copyright: © Sergey Skuratov Architects / Capital Group
“The value of this place lies in its openness” – a key definition of the project’s approach.
If we take a closer look at the composition, it becomes clear that Sergey Skuratov both responds to the existing urban layout and subtly adjusts it. The site, as noted, lies on the filled-in pond of the Presnya River; rivers rarely run straight, and the two flanking streets follow gentle curves. The broader, four-lane Konyushkovskaya Street to the east bends more, while the smaller Druzhinnikovskaya Street bends less. Both are oriented toward the south-southwest. In the “House of Sports” project, the curve of Konyushkovskaya Street is acknowledged – it could hardly be ignored, as it defines the site boundary – and transformed into a smoothly chamfered corner, forming a kind of south-facing “prow” or “tail” of the stylobate courtyard. This triangular section of the courtyard has an 8% slope; it opens toward the river, offering panoramic views for those walking there. Adjacent to it, lies the rectangle of an open football field, while a “pool” fountain tucked between them recalls the former Krasnaya Presnya pond.
By contrast, the row of residential buildings is aligned strictly along the meridian, which is optimal in terms of sunlight exposure. In this way, among the naturally curving streets of Moscow, the architects introduce a new straight line – a kind of structural spine. In the northern part of the site, an office building stretches laterally, precisely from west to east. It complements the “sports + housing” program by adding a third component, while also separating the private courtyard on the stylobate roof from the public square by the Barrikadnaya Metro Station.
As a result, the overall outline somewhat resembles a kitchen knife: an elongated rectangle running north to south, with one chamfered, “pointed” corner.
In plan, both the residential blocks and the office building take the form of elongated rectangles with an asymmetrically cut “nose” at one end – not sharp, but rendered with varying degrees of sculptural rounding. Clearly, this “signature” pointed form – partly dictated by the site, partly discovered in the design process – is repeated in several variations. This creates an internal rhythm that lends coherence to the project as a whole.
These pointed end “prows” also serve as the key points of interaction between the complex and the city – its “main façades” or primary accents. One might recall the Narkomfin Building by Moisei Ginzburg, hidden behind the embassy buildings nearby: there, the role of the projection is played by three semicircular balconies facing south. There seems to be a subtle resonance with them in Skuratov’s project, even if the architect himself does not explicitly mention it.
It is worth noting that the two side-end “prow façades” of the House of Sports are, in a sense, opposed in terms of plastique and form a kind of counterpoint. The first, marking the end of the row of residential buildings and facing the river and Konyushkovskaya Street, is devoid of openings and shaped as a smoothly curving surface – a dense, stone-like “flank”.
“House of Sports”, Druzhinnikovskaya 18; project, 2025
Copyright: © Sergey Skuratov Architects / Capital Group
As the architects point out, in certain views it echoes the stone surface of the nearby high-rise.
The office building takes up the same theme but rotates it by 90 degrees, facing not south but east – toward the city and in the direction of the high-rise. Here, the asymmetrically chamfered and rounded “prow”, unlike the first, is entirely transparent thanks to curved glass. At the same time, it is held together by slender metal “bands”, which seem like tensile threads binding all the volumes into a single – this time, artistic – system.
“House of Sports”, Druzhinnikovskaya 18; project, 2025
Copyright: © Sergey Skuratov Architects / Capital Group
In other words, the entire complex develops from a solid, compacted stone corner to a transparent, glassy, almost dematerialized one – while retaining a closely related form. It quietly demonstrates the range and versatility of contemporary architectural approaches to a single plastique motif. It’s a subtle move.
Moreover, Sergey Skuratov organizes the space in such a way that, alongside the private courtyard for residents on the stylobate roof, a considerable amount of public urban space emerges around it – accessible to anyone. The sports facilities, too, are intended for broad public use, which is hardly surprising given their professional orientation.
The counterpoint between the two “prow façades” – the solid southern and the transparent eastern corners of an implied right triangle – is further developed through material and façade rhythm. In addition to glass, the two primary façade materials are light-colored stone and reddish bronze. In the project, these are represented by glass-fiber-reinforced concrete panels and steel elements with a bronze tint.
In expressive terms, the metal tends toward the northern and eastern parts of the complex, responding to the neighboring red-brick buildings of the Embassy of the United States in Moscow, as well as to the granite base of the high-rise – and perhaps even to the entrance arch of the Moscow Zoo. One can also detect echoes of the façade grid of the SkyView Residential Complex. “Stone”, in turn, forms a dialogue both with the White House and with the main body of the high-rise, clad in its characteristic light, ceramic “Stalin-era” tiles. To be honest, although the authors speak of contextual references, it is not always easy to pinpoint exact correspondences – but still, the Presnya district is, after all, red and white, isn’t it? In color, and in its historical identity as well.
Thus, bronze dominates in the northeastern part, and the piers of the office building are entirely metallic. On the northern and southern façades, they gradually become denser toward the west, while the western end is sliced off almost like with a knife and fully glazed. Fair enough – white collars and blue suits also want a sunset view.
“House of Sports”, Druzhinnikovskaya 18; project, 2025
Copyright: © Sergey Skuratov Architects / Capital Group
The residential volumes, on the southern and outer western street side, are clad in light-colored stone; their external façades read as vertical planes, as befits a city street. On the inside, however – facing the courtyard – they seem to “flow” downward in cascades of asymmetrical, differently scaled balconies and terraces edged in metal. The western façade appears austere and stone-like, while the eastern one, oriented toward the courtyard, becomes freer and terraced – almost like a waterfall. Or like a split stone with an amethyst geode inside: limestone on the outside, shimmering and iridescent within.
“House of Sports”, Druzhinnikovskaya 18; project, 2025
Copyright: © Sergey Skuratov Architects / Capital Group
In general, this accentuated, almost tactile contrast between the imagery of the street façade and that of the courtyard façade is one of the recurring themes in the work of Sergey Skuratov. It can be observed, for example, in Tessinsky-1. Unlike that club house, however, the courtyard on Krasnaya Presnya is not enclosed on all sides: the buildings form an angular frame from the north and west, allowing sunlight to reach the courtyard for the longest possible duration throughout the day.
“House of Sports”, Druzhinnikovskaya 18; project, 2025
Copyright: © Sergey Skuratov Architects / Capital Group
It is worth emphasizing that the two façade “materials” – stone and metal – are united by a single plastique theme.
Yet this theme is multifaceted and varied, even if it has a shared “base”. The point of departure seems to be the same rounded, chamfered “prow” form – a figure approximating one-third of a circular segment – present in the site plan and in the main volumes of the complex. From this, one might assume, emerged the asymmetrical “wing”. They are echoed by similar figures, but with concave rather than convex curvature, producing nuanced effects of light and shadow and sharp edges.
The more clearly defined figures take the form of true segments – not semicylinders! – to which a flat insert adjoins on one side. The simplest element is a flat yet strongly protruding rectangular pier. All these components are arranged in a staggered order; in the lower sections, they are further animated by recessed bands, adding yet more variation.
At first glance, it may seem that all the piers are entirely different – perhaps even mounted on hidden metal pins, allowing them to rotate and present different “faces” to the viewer. This, however, is not the case. Yet the effect of apparent randomness – within what is, in fact, a fairly strict rhythm – is very much present. It is a successful way of reducing the perceived mass of the façade and dematerializing it: despite its sculptural volume, the mass seems to dissolve itself. How exactly? Well – that’s the trick. Once it is built, we will see.
Another complementary technique can, for now, only be discerned in the plans of the “bronze” office building: the piers on its northern façade, facing the metro, are not convex but recessed, while those on the southern façade, facing the courtyard, are volumetric. It is as if they have been “pressed” from north to south – though there is no direct one-to-one correspondence between the forms.
More likely, this reflects a response to lighting conditions: the northern façade will receive sunlight only in summer, and only at oblique angles – morning and evening – whereas the southern façade will be continuously illuminated.
This is a subtle, almost jeweler-like treatment of façades. Beneath it, lies a clearly perceptible modular matrix, yet the dynamic balance between transparent and solid, stone and metal, static and kinetic elements has been carefully calibrated across the entire complex, worked out in detail and drawn with meticulous precision.
The version of the project now approved for construction was developed in 2025, in response to a request from the city authorities and the client to propose something more expressive.
But let us briefly touch on the history of the site and the project.
In 2019, the site was being designed as an “Ice Center”.
Then Sergey Skuratov won two consecutive invitation-only competitions: first, in 2020, for half of the site – 1.6 hectares, with a trapezoidal, nearly square footprint. The idea of “placing the sports facilities underground”, within a stylobate, was proposed by Skuratov from the outset; in fact, the concept appealed to the client immediately.
Then, in 2021, the site expanded to 4.2 hectares, stretching toward the river and acquiring a longitudinal elevation difference of 2.5 meters – essentially the configuration we see in the final version.
Back in 2021, the open football field also appeared in the project, though it was then located in the northern part of the site, near the metro. In its current location – on the side facing the White House – the design at that time featured an oval restaurant, later reprogrammed as a bathhouse. In that same 2021 scheme, unlike the 2020 version, all inhabited buildings were aligned along a north-south axis – compact and efficient – freeing up a substantial area for the courtyard descending along the slope on the stylobate roof.
In total, the architects of Sergey Skuratov’s company developed five proposals for the Druzhinnikovskaya site, including two competition-winning entries and the final design.
Four of these were laconic and entirely white. The earliest version featured a kind of “pulled” lattice corner.
The subsequent schemes became even more restrained, governed by a delicate grid with windows rotated at 45 degrees to capture light. It was a highly concise, calm, and structurally clear solution – light in both appearance and concept.
The final project, developed in response to a request for greater expressiveness and ultimately approved for construction, both diverges from and synthesizes the earlier iterations. The sports functions gathered underground; the row of buildings aligned north-south; and the white grid – though transformed into a stone “puzzle” – all remain.
As for the contraposition of the sculptural corners, set diagonally in relation to one another, this feature seems to originate in the very first version. Despite all the differences, it establishes a shared tendency – linking the initial and final designs – toward a gradient of plasticity.
Perhaps the site itself calls for something of this kind.
Still, the main point remains what Sergey Skuratov describes above: a spatial pause within the urban fabric.
It aligns with the stated status of the housing, yet also allows one to “breathe deeply” here, on the slope of the former Presnya riverbed. It does not overcrowd the place – and for that, credit is due both to the architect and to the client.

