По-русски

Our Everything

Who is Alexey Shchusev? In the last couple of weeks, since the architect’s 150th birthday, different individuals have answered this question differently. The most detailed, illustrated, and elegantly presented response is an exhibition held in two buildings of the Museum of Architecture on Vozdvizhenka. Four curators, a year and a half of work performed by the entire museum, and exhibition design by Sergey Tchoban and Alexandra Sheiner – in this article, we take you on a tour of the exhibition and show what’s what in it.

30 October 2023
Review
mainImg
Architect:
Sergei Tchoban
For the Museum of Architecture, also known as the Shchusev State Museum of Architecture, this exhibition is institutional, “namesake”, and very important. Perhaps, even pivotal? A couple of years ago, Elizaveta Likhacheva told me that the preparation for the Shchusev exhibition could hail the beginning of a permanent exhibition because the absence of a permanent exhibition has long been one of the main “pains” of the museum, especially since the relocation of half of the collection from the Donskoy Monastery to Vozdvizhenka. Thus, it comes as no surprise that a lot of time and effort has been invested in the exhibition; “the entire museum worked on it for a year and a half” (although some have mentioned all four years). Three published books and one forthcoming (the one about the “Moscow” hotel), a film, and around 700 exhibits from 18 collections – yes, it was truly a monumental effort. Add to it the design by Sergey Tchoban to get a complete picture. In short, the museum is now rightfully at the center of the professional community’s attention.

First things first, however. The exhibition has several peculiarities: first, it is a research-based exhibition, and in our time when most people focus on entertaining the venerable public for money, and the prefix “scientific research institute” is often hastily dropped as something embarrassing, the museum fully justifies its prefix. I can’t say it happened suddenly – I’ve been observing the museum for over 20 years. I saw it go through all stages from denial to acceptance, being a very dull scientific institute, then a trendy hangout with vodka and pickles in the icy Ruin – yes, the place has been through a lot of things. Throughout this time, however, it nevertheless faithfully served as an architectural archive for researchers. Here, a compliment is due to Elizaveta Likhacheva: under Irina Korobina’s leadership, they restored the Ruin and opened a temporary version of a permanent exhibition. However, it was under Likhacheva that significant museum exhibitions once again became fundamental, one after another, with originals, research, and hot exhibition design.

Exhibition "Alexey Shchusev. 150". Museum of Architecture, 01.10.2023-21.01.2024
Copyright: Photograph © Vasily Bulanov / provided by Chart


Moving on! When they began preparing the exhibition about the “founding father”, it turned out that everyone seemed to know “everything and at the same time nothing”, as Alice in Wonderland would say. There are yawning gaps in the books, not everything has been published, and a comprehensive monograph is still nonexistent. There is one about his church projects written by Diana Keypen-Vardits, and probably, in time, another one will appear, more thorough, based on Aleksey Shchusev’s personal archive – this time written by Sergey Koluzakov. But, in general, Aleksey Shchusev’s legacy has not been fundamentally studied. The exhibition is by no means a monograph, but it fills some gaps, especially since its catalog, 7 centimeters thick and weighing as much as a full-size brick, is combined with a collection of 9 research articles on various topics. Honestly, I’m clueless why they did it this way – it would have been much better to publish the collection separately, and it would have been easier to buy it. Nevertheless, it provides a solid foundation for further study of Shchusev’s architecture and biography.

Exhibition "Alexey Shchusev. 150". Museum of Architecture, 01.10.2023-21.01.2024
Copyright: Photograph © Julia tarabarina, Archi.ru


Equally valuable is the two-volume set: one volume contains the memoirs of four individuals, and the other contains all of Shchusev’s articles and written works. Additionally, the museum regularly posts small fragments about Shchusev on its Telegram channel, which is also intriguing and well-suited for those with a clip-like consciousness. Plus, there’s a film, or actually even two: one produced by the museum and another by Russia’s First Channel.

This is certainly not a monograph, not a definitive and thoroughly researched study, but rather a preparation for it – a curious sign of the times when information can be obtained in various ways. From all sides, we are now being told who Shchusev is.

Shchusev

I have a confession to make here: Shchusev is not very clear to me as an architect.

For some, he is the architect of Marfo-Mariinsky Convent with Konenkov’s carvings and Nesterov’s paintings, for others, he is the author of Lenin’s Mausoleum, and for others, he is just an obscure name in the museum’s title. He was a very versatile architect, seemingly the only one who not only navigated but also succeeded, with good results, through the twists and turns of the first half of the Russian 20th century.

Shchusev′s posthumous portrait, which stood in the corner on the stairs, was moved, now it is in front of the entrance to the Enfilade. Exhibition "Alexey Shchusev. 150". Museum of Architecture, 01.10.2023-21.01.2024
Copyright: Photograph © Vasily Bulanov / provided by Chart


Such a “versatility” in the 20th century, which can boast lists of modernists who did not embrace classicism and classicists who did not embrace the avant-garde, is somewhat challenging to understand. For some reason, he could do things that no other architects could afford to do. According to reports, he criticized VKHUTEMAS and its graduates for illiteracy, yet he worked in constructivism, modernism, various forms of Stalinist classicism, and elaborate national styles. A vivid example is the theater in Tashkent, which occupies half of the exhibition hall. After the Second World War, he undertook projects for the reconstruction of cities: Stalingrad, Istra, Veliky Novgorod, Tuapse, and Kishinev. In other words, he was both a temple and a city builder.

Exhibition "Alexey Shchusev. 150". Museum of Architecture, 01.10.2023-21.01.2024
Copyright: Photograph © Vasily Bulanov / provided by Chart


One probably cannot categorize Shchusev as a restorer, yet with the participation of Peter Pokryshkin, he reconstructed the pre-Mongol church of Vasily in Ovruch for Nicholas II, placing the found fragments back in their “original” places. He also took a serious interest in the history of architecture. The key monument of the Soviet twenties – the Mausoleum, or more precisely, Lenin’s Mausoleums – likely became a kind of protective decree for Shchusev. Whether as the author of the communist leader’s tomb or simply as a very skillful person, he almost without losses survived not only shifts in stylistic preferences but also Stalin’s repressions.

Exhibition "Alexey Shchusev. 150". Museum of Architecture, 01.10.2023-21.01.2024
Copyright: Photograph © Vasily Bulanov / provided by Chart


Alexey Shchusev also defended the exiled restorer, Peter Baranovsky. What’s even more surprising is that when he was “denounced” in the Soviet newspaper “Pravda” by his architect colleagues, the kind individuals Saveliev and Stapran in 1937, Shchusev was merely demoted and not expelled from the Union of Architects after this article. Other architects were exiled or even executed after such accusations. How was this possible?

All of this can be explained and understood in different ways. The word “versatility” obviously had negative connotations back then – either you’re for the Reds or the Whites. However, you can also look at it differently, as one of the four curators, Anatoly Oksenyuk, the museum’s deputy director for science, said at the exhibition’s opening: “A person who wants and can work will work and will be successful”. I must say, it doesn’t always work out, but what a beautiful motivational message for everyone!

And somehow, I can’t help but think that there are people who should, perhaps, have lived forever. If Shchusev lived in our time, he would probably have excelled in high positions, building towers, stadiums, and leading master plans. I don’t know if he could have made post-Soviet architecture happy; that seems unlikely. However, he would have undoubtedly made it efficient. Maybe I’m wrong – look at the words of the young Shchusev about church architecture. It’s as if those words should be carved in stone: “It should only be subservient to the religious idea and not tolerate servile constraints in forms”.

Exhibition "Alexey Shchusev. 150". Museum of Architecture, 01.10.2023-21.01.2024
Copyright: Photograph © Julia Tarabarina / Archi.ru


In short, there’s a lot to take in.

It’s not surprising that one of the exhibition’s tasks is to showcase the diversity of Shchusev’s personality while somehow encapsulating or “pulling it together”. The architectural design of the exhibition by Sergey Tchoban and Alexandra Sheiner significantly aids in achieving this goal.

The Exposition

The exhibition’s design is the second distinctive feature here. It is light, simple, and concise. With this design, the exhibition resembles a fashionable magazine – well-designed, with unobtrusive comments. Particularly noteworthy is the placement of the museum’s new logo in the middle hall, shaped like the Cyrillic letter “Щ” and resembling Latin numbers of Mausoleums. It feels like we are walking inside a book about Shchusev, a book that, I must remind you, is not yet complete. Not literally, of course; it’s a metaphor, but the sensation is intriguing.

Exhibition "Alexey Shchusev. 150". Museum of Architecture, 01.10.2023-21.01.2024
Copyright: Photograph © Vasily Bulanov / provided by Chart


Another feature of the exhibition design is its tactful approach to historical interiors, both the classical Enfilade and the vaulted “Aptekarsky Prikaz”. Unlike other exhibitions that fence off or compete with historical spaces, this one, simple and white, goes down quite well. Alexandra Sheiner told me that this was intentional: in some cases, the exhibition designers even reduced the height of the stands to make the medallions behind them visible, suggesting illuminating the medallions. These are sensible decisions not only because historical settings should be respected (admittedly, this doesn’t always work), but also because the halls of the Enfilade themselves are, in a sense, exhibits – they were where Shchusev’s museum opened back in 1948.

The most obvious statement about the architect’s diversity is placed upfront in the first hall: here, headlines like “museum worker”, “defender”, and “restorer” greet us. Interestingly, the main title, “architect”, is missing, likely implying, “who else but an architect”. Also, there’s a list of major state awards, from imperial to Stalinist (Shchusev did not outlive Stalin; he passed away in 1949), and a portrait, an oil painting in a gilded frame. I must mention that a few such “standout” elements, deviating from the overall flow, are connected to the fact that storage sources required not altering the works too much, so the frames were somewhat obligatory, but they also contribute to the exhibition’s diversity.

  • zooming
    Exhibition "Alexey Shchusev. 150". Museum of Architecture, 01.10.2023-21.01.2024
    Copyright: Photograph © Vasily Bulanov / provided by Chart
  • zooming
    Exhibition "Alexey Shchusev. 150". Museum of Architecture, 01.10.2023-21.01.2024
    Copyright: Photograph © Vasily Bulanov / provided by Chart


The rest, and, as we remember, there is a lot of material, is neatly and meticulously integrated into the concept: white frames rhythmically complement and partly neutralize the inevitable variety in graphic formats. Most of the halls are immersed in white, enlivened by a simple stepped form whose source, as the authors explain, is the silhouette of the Mausoleum. Moreover, Sergey Tchoban and Alexandra Sheiner found the proportions of the Golden Section there, near Lenin, and constructed their steps also in the “golden” proportion: slightly more, slightly less.

Exhibition "Alexey Shchusev. 150". Museum of Architecture, 01.10.2023-21.01.2024
Copyright: Photograph © Vasily Bulanov / provided by Chart


Inverted pyramid shapes form supports for models, and only in one place – in the small pass-through hall dedicated to bridges – did the architects allow themselves to construct large steps, adding a perspective effect to them: the middle part is slanted, which, in the overall restrained design, produces the desired effect, especially when walking back towards the exit after viewing the exhibition.

Exhibition "Alexey Shchusev. 150". Museum of Architecture, 01.10.2023-21.01.2024
Copyright: Photograph © Vasily Bulanov / provided by Chart


Equally impressive is the arc-shaped bench in the center, like some “swing” if you imagine it depicted on a master plan, somewhere between the avant-garde and imperial classicism. There are also white schematic plans of cities in the design of the reconstruction projects that Shchusev participated in after the war: Stalingrad, Istra, Veliky Novgorod, Tuapse, Kishinev. Metal racks in the final hall of the Enfilade, dedicated to the history of the museum’s creation, also make a considerable impression.

Exhibition "Alexey Shchusev. 150". Museum of Architecture, 01.10.2023-21.01.2024
Copyright: Photograph © Vasily Bulanov / provided by Chart


Exhibition "Alexey Shchusev. 150". Museum of Architecture, 01.10.2023-21.01.2024
Copyright: Photograph © Vasily Bulanov / provided by Chart


Exhibition "Alexey Shchusev. 150". Museum of Architecture, 01.10.2023-21.01.2024
Copyright: Photograph © Vasily Bulanov / provided by Chart


In the “Aptekarsky Prikaz” section of the exhibition, dedicated to churches, there are many more shelves, but the exhibits are placed more densely, and there are more of them. Circular and rounded column-like supports, resembling columns of Novgorod and Pskov churches, organize the space. On these supports, six white models were specifically commissioned for the exhibition. Therefore, they are of the same scale and serve as both exhibits and exhibition design elements. Interestingly, part of the exhibition infrastructure is planned to be preserved and used subsequently, including the supports and the lattice stands – simple and seemingly very sturdy despite their transparency. The “Aptekarsky Prikaz” space benefits the most, as a new wardrobe and storage rooms have been added, designed in a way that now, for any incoming visitor, it is clear where the exhibition begins—the walls “lead” the visitor forward.

Exhibition "Alexey Shchusev. 150". Museum of Architecture, 01.10.2023-21.01.2024
Copyright: Photograph © Vasily Bulanov / provided by Chart


Exhibition "Alexey Shchusev. 150". Museum of Architecture, 01.10.2023-21.01.2024
Copyright: Photograph © Vasily Bulanov / provided by Chart


Sergey Tchoban and Alexandra Sheiner allowed themselves only one colorful accent – the red hall at the “crossroads”. It reminds me of the conference hall of the St. Petersburg Academy of Arts, which makes perfect sense since academic drawings and Shchusev’s diploma work are displayed in it. There’s a bit of lyricism in this decision: both Tchoban and Sheiner studied at the Academy, and defended their theses in the same hall as Shchusev.

  • zooming
    1 / 4
    Exhibition "Alexey Shchusev. 150". Museum of Architecture, 01.10.2023-21.01.2024
    Copyright: Photograph © Vasily Bulanov / provided by Chart
  • zooming
    2 / 4
    Exhibition "Alexey Shchusev. 150". Museum of Architecture, 01.10.2023-21.01.2024
    Copyright: Photograph © Vasily Bulanov / provided by Chart
  • zooming
    3 / 4
    Exhibition "Alexey Shchusev. 150". Museum of Architecture, 01.10.2023-21.01.2024
    Copyright: Photograph © Vasily Bulanov / provided by Chart
  • zooming
    4 / 4
    Exhibition "Alexey Shchusev. 150". Museum of Architecture, 01.10.2023-21.01.2024
    Copyright: Photograph © Vasily Bulanov / provided by Chart


In short, white color with a consistent theme and not too garish accents is an almost sure-fire solution for an exhibition rich in exhibits: it unites, it “smooths things out” and even makes those delicate “plastique” comments that the authors of the exhibition space allow themselves seem more noticeable. Could it be that the restrained design is a response to the criticism of the too vibrant Melnikov exhibition, according to some appreciators? Maybe yes, maybe no. In any case, the exhibition is now bright and at the same time calm, which is good because there is a lot to take in.

Multifaceted:

So, Shchusev was the builder of the Mausoleum (that’s represented in the center of the Enfilade), and Shchusev was the author of modern churches (that’s in the “Aptekarsky Prikaz”) – obvious things. But there are quite a few non-obvious “discoveries” – for those who are not very familiar with Shchusev’s work, and that’s the majority, everyone (including myself) knows him somewhat selectively.

For example, it’s important to know that Shchusev is not just the author of Kazansky Railway Station; he worked on it throughout his life, from the imperial era to the 1940s. Perhaps his career in the early Bolshevik era unfolded in such a peculiar way because he was crucial as the architect of a very large railway station – and train transportation was crucial in the 1920s, much more so for the “young Soviet republic”.

And how fortunate it is that the current museum director, Natalia Shashkova, defended her doctoral thesis precisely on the Moscow-Kursk Railway, the chief architect of which was Shchusev. This resulted in a whole hall at the exhibition: not just about Kazansky Station but also about small stations, additional ones, also designed by Shchusev. And there’s a hall dedicated to his bridges too.

  • zooming
    1 / 7
    Exhibition "Alexey Shchusev. 150". Museum of Architecture, 01.10.2023-21.01.2024
    Copyright: Photograph © Vasily Bulanov / provided by Chart
  • zooming
    2 / 7
    Exhibition "Alexey Shchusev. 150". Museum of Architecture, 01.10.2023-21.01.2024
    Copyright: Photograph © Vasily Bulanov / provided by Chart
  • zooming
    3 / 7
    Exhibition "Alexey Shchusev. 150". Museum of Architecture, 01.10.2023-21.01.2024
    Copyright: Photograph © Vasily Bulanov / provided by Chart
  • zooming
    4 / 7
    Exhibition "Alexey Shchusev. 150". Museum of Architecture, 01.10.2023-21.01.2024
    Copyright: Photograph © Vasily Bulanov / provided by Chart
  • zooming
    5 / 7
    Exhibition "Alexey Shchusev. 150". Museum of Architecture, 01.10.2023-21.01.2024
    Copyright: Photograph © Vasily Bulanov / provided by Chart
  • zooming
    6 / 7
    Exhibition "Alexey Shchusev. 150". Museum of Architecture, 01.10.2023-21.01.2024
    Copyright: Photograph © Vasily Bulanov / provided by Chart
  • zooming
    7 / 7
    Exhibition "Alexey Shchusev. 150". Museum of Architecture, 01.10.2023-21.01.2024
    Copyright: Photograph © Vasily Bulanov / provided by Chart


Shchusev’s work on the projects of the Moscow Academy of Sciences, later built according to Yuri Platonov’s design, is also not very well-known. Nevertheless, it inspired part of the academic development of Lenin Avenue and served as the basis in some places.

Exhibition "Alexey Shchusev. 150". Museum of Architecture, 01.10.2023-21.01.2024
Copyright: Photograph © Vasily Bulanov / provided by Chart


The “Moscow” hotel is also a separate story. It is associated with that denunciatory article from Pravda in 1937, so it started painfully for Shchusev and ended sadly too. The hotel was dismantled and turned into a replica, similar but not quite the same. At the beginning of the 2000s, the museum tried to fight for the preservation of the authentic building, just as it did almost simultaneously for the preservation of the authentic Voentorg. Both attempts were unsuccessful, and now they show us fragments of the genuine “Moscow” hotel collected during its demolition.

Beautifully arranged in a glass case at the base of the columns are various hotel items, from rosaries and an old telephone to a plaster capital of a pilaster and balusters from the railing. The faceted medallions from the coffered ceiling are on the walls.

  • zooming
    1 / 9
    Exhibition "Alexey Shchusev. 150". Museum of Architecture, 01.10.2023-21.01.2024
    Copyright: Photograph © Vasily Bulanov / provided by Chart
  • zooming
    2 / 9
    Exhibition "Alexey Shchusev. 150". Museum of Architecture, 01.10.2023-21.01.2024
    Copyright: Photograph © Vasily Bulanov / provided by Chart
  • zooming
    3 / 9
    Exhibition "Alexey Shchusev. 150". Museum of Architecture, 01.10.2023-21.01.2024
    Copyright: Photograph © Vasily Bulanov / provided by Chart
  • zooming
    4 / 9
    Exhibition "Alexey Shchusev. 150". Museum of Architecture, 01.10.2023-21.01.2024
    Copyright: Photograph © Vasily Bulanov / provided by Chart
  • zooming
    5 / 9
    Exhibition "Alexey Shchusev. 150". Museum of Architecture, 01.10.2023-21.01.2024
    Copyright: Photograph © Vasily Bulanov / provided by Chart
  • zooming
    6 / 9
    Exhibition "Alexey Shchusev. 150". Museum of Architecture, 01.10.2023-21.01.2024
    Copyright: Photograph © Vasily Bulanov / provided by Chart
  • zooming
    7 / 9
    Exhibition "Alexey Shchusev. 150". Museum of Architecture, 01.10.2023-21.01.2024
    Copyright: Photograph © Vasily Bulanov / provided by Chart
  • zooming
    8 / 9
    Exhibition "Alexey Shchusev. 150". Museum of Architecture, 01.10.2023-21.01.2024
    Copyright: Photograph © Vasily Bulanov / provided by Chart
  • zooming
    9 / 9
    Exhibition "Alexey Shchusev. 150". Museum of Architecture, 01.10.2023-21.01.2024
    Copyright: Photograph © Vasily Bulanov / provided by Chart


Moving on, it should be said that Shchusev’s work on the restoration of cities was not very well-known. Kishinev was particularly important to him; it was where he was born and spent his childhood. Novgorod served as a model for modern ideas about the “Russian spirit” and as a source for the architecture of churches. It’s intriguing why Shchusev did not restore Pskov; it seems to have been historically conditioned. In the annotation to the Novgorod project, Shchusev recommends maintaining the external appearance in the spirit of classicism and Novgorod/Pskov architecture. It makes one want to go to Novgorod and look for such motifs among the Stalinist buildings, but it still seems they are not there.

The Museum

The last hall in the enfilade is dedicated to the museum itself.

There were two museums – initially, of course, there was one, a museum created in the early 1930s at the Academy of Architecture, located in the Donskoy Monastery. Then, in 1945, Shchusev established the second one – the Museum of Russian Architecture. It had a distinct emphasis on identity in its name. In those historical moments, many were thinking primarily about identity (and once again, it raises the question: what would Shchusev be doing now?). The explanatory plaque says that Shchusev expressed his views on the architectural museum as far back as 1919, and he had experience leading the Tretyakov Gallery (in 1926-1928). Shchusev received support for the “public museum” directly from Molotov and, at the same time, obtained the building, the Talyzin House. Over three years, he resettled the communal apartment residents, and in 1948, he opened an exhibition dedicated to all periods of Russian architecture right there, in the enfilade where the current exhibition in honor of Shchusev is taking place. There are rumors that some exhibits were borrowed from the Academy of Architecture’s museum.

Exhibition "Alexey Shchusev. 150". Museum of Architecture, 01.10.2023-21.01.2024
Copyright: Photograph © Vasily Bulanov / provided by Chart


Exhibition "Alexey Shchusev. 150". Museum of Architecture, 01.10.2023-21.01.2024
Copyright: Photograph © Vasily Bulanov / provided by Chart


This project became Shchusev’s last: the museum opened in 1948, he passed away in May 1949, and the next day, the museum was named after him.

This story is somewhat intriguing, and hopefully, the museum will continue to tell it. In 1964, the two museums were merged under the name Shchusev, and in the 1990s, the museum moved out of the Donskoy Monastery, settling in the Talizins’ house, where it now feels very cramped, come right down to it

The latticed shelves in the last hall become that almost unverifiable “hook” that connects the exhibition in the Enfilade with its continuation dedicated to Shchusev’s church architecture – similar constructions are installed there, designed for reuse in the future. The museum was the end, and the churches were the beginning, and everything seems to loop.

The Churches

The exhibition of Shchusev’s church design projects, occupying the Aptekarsky Prikaz, is organized by separate curators: the museum’s scientific secretary Yulia Ratomskaya and the deputy director for science Anatoly Oksenyuk. It can be viewed separately because it is very rich – exhibits arranged in two rows, and six new white layouts harmoniously zone the space. It’s a kind of comprehensive textbook on church architecture at the beginning of the century.

Exhibition "Alexey Shchusev. 150". Museum of Architecture, 01.10.2023-21.01.2024
Copyright: Photograph © Vasily Bulanov / provided by Chart


Shchusev also collaborated with artists such as the conservator Nesterov (they fell out when the architect built the Mausoleum) and avant-garde artists like Petrov-Vodkin, Roerich, and even Natalia Goncharova. His first significant work was the restoration of the Church of Vasily in Ovruch in collaboration with restorer Pyotr Petrovich Pokryshkin. In the process of excavation, the foundations of the stair towers were discovered and promptly restored. Shchusev became one of the favorite architects of the imperial family. Later, he built the Marfo-Mariinsky Convent for Grand Duchess Elizabeth Feodorovna – a masterpiece of church modernism, a cohesive, romantic, and beautiful work that is universally loved.

Exhibition "Alexey Shchusev. 150". Museum of Architecture, 01.10.2023-21.01.2024
Copyright: Photograph © Vasily Bulanov / provided by Chart


There are numerous exhibits, but what “holds” the exhibition space is the Nesterov cardboard depiction of the Veil of Veronica, painted for presentation to the Empress Elizabeth and once placed on the facade. It’s a fascinating analogue to modern renders and VR models shown to clients for project presentation and discussion. Its origin in the museum is unknown – likely, it was part of Shchusev’s collection. However, the painting is very “authentic”, solid, and withstands close examination.

Exhibition "Alexey Shchusev. 150". Museum of Architecture, 01.10.2023-21.01.2024
Copyright: Photograph © Julia tarabarina, Archi.ru


Equally recognizable from a distance is the Petrov-Vodkin painting: it is known that he was an icon painter by education, but early works are rarely seen, and there isn’t always an opportunity to compare his Trinity with the “Proletarian Madonna”.

Exhibition "Alexey Shchusev. 150". Museum of Architecture, 01.10.2023-21.01.2024
Copyright: Photograph © Julia tarabarina, Archi.ru


Some might say there are too many exhibits, but I appreciate the abundance of drawings and sketches, “brought to light”. This includes ornaments, which are a separate theme; you can examine each curl.

Exhibition "Alexey Shchusev. 150". Museum of Architecture, 01.10.2023-21.01.2024
Copyright: Photograph © Julia tarabarina, Archi.ru


In short, this exhibition is a discovery for fans of the Marfo-Mariinsky Convent. Presumably, it is also valuable for church architects and their clients who should visit for guided tours, if only to appreciate Shchusev’s reflections on the freedom of creativity. The development of church architecture in Orthodoxy at the beginning of the century experienced a rise but then stagnated and has yet to break free. While hopes might be unfounded, perhaps the exhibition will help in this regard as well.

  • zooming
    1 / 16
    Exhibition "Alexey Shchusev. 150". Museum of Architecture, 01.10.2023-21.01.2024
    Copyright: Photograph © Julia tarabarina, Archi.ru
  • zooming
    2 / 16
    Exhibition "Alexey Shchusev. 150". Museum of Architecture, 01.10.2023-21.01.2024
    Copyright: Photograph © Julia tarabarina, Archi.ru
  • zooming
    3 / 16
    Exhibition "Alexey Shchusev. 150". Museum of Architecture, 01.10.2023-21.01.2024
    Copyright: Photograph © Julia tarabarina, Archi.ru
  • zooming
    4 / 16
    Exhibition "Alexey Shchusev. 150". Museum of Architecture, 01.10.2023-21.01.2024
    Copyright: Photograph © Vasily Bulanov / provided by Chart
  • zooming
    5 / 16
    Exhibition "Alexey Shchusev. 150". Museum of Architecture, 01.10.2023-21.01.2024
    Copyright: Photograph © Vasily Bulanov / provided by Chart
  • zooming
    6 / 16
    Exhibition "Alexey Shchusev. 150". Museum of Architecture, 01.10.2023-21.01.2024
    Copyright: Photograph © Vasily Bulanov / provided by Chart
  • zooming
    7 / 16
    Exhibition "Alexey Shchusev. 150". Museum of Architecture, 01.10.2023-21.01.2024
    Copyright: Photograph © Vasily Bulanov / provided by Chart
  • zooming
    8 / 16
    Exhibition "Alexey Shchusev. 150". Museum of Architecture, 01.10.2023-21.01.2024
    Copyright: Photograph © Vasily Bulanov / provided by Chart
  • zooming
    9 / 16
    Exhibition "Alexey Shchusev. 150". Museum of Architecture, 01.10.2023-21.01.2024
    Copyright: Photograph © Vasily Bulanov / provided by Chart
  • zooming
    10 / 16
    Exhibition "Alexey Shchusev. 150". Museum of Architecture, 01.10.2023-21.01.2024
    Copyright: Photograph © Vasily Bulanov / provided by Chart
  • zooming
    11 / 16
    Exhibition "Alexey Shchusev. 150". Museum of Architecture, 01.10.2023-21.01.2024
    Copyright: Photograph © Vasily Bulanov / provided by Chart
  • zooming
    12 / 16
    Exhibition "Alexey Shchusev. 150". Museum of Architecture, 01.10.2023-21.01.2024
    Copyright: Photograph © Vasily Bulanov / provided by Chart
  • zooming
    13 / 16
    Exhibition "Alexey Shchusev. 150". Museum of Architecture, 01.10.2023-21.01.2024
    Copyright: Photograph © Vasily Bulanov / provided by Chart
  • zooming
    14 / 16
    Exhibition "Alexey Shchusev. 150". Museum of Architecture, 01.10.2023-21.01.2024
    Copyright: Photograph © Vasily Bulanov / provided by Chart
  • zooming
    15 / 16
    Exhibition "Alexey Shchusev. 150". Museum of Architecture, 01.10.2023-21.01.2024
    Copyright: Photograph © Vasily Bulanov / provided by Chart
  • zooming
    16 / 16
    Exhibition "Alexey Shchusev. 150". Museum of Architecture, 01.10.2023-21.01.2024
    Copyright: Photograph © Vasily Bulanov / provided by Chart


So, who is Shchusev? The exhibition doesn’t provide a definitive answer, and it is not expected to. Instead, it raises many questions, “estranges” the theme, and refreshes perception. Aleksey Shchusev’s figure has fused with the museum and over the years has become somewhat frozen and simultaneously unclear, in contrast to many of his contemporaries who have distinct and defined images. Everyone knows that Shekhtel built mansions, Melnikov sought his avant-garde form, Ginzburg experimented with a house no less innovative than Corbusier’s, and so on. But there is no such distinct anchor for Shchusev; he is distributed among many points: the monastery, the station, the tomb – and loses clarity. It’s akin to the posthumous sculptural portrait on the stairs, where the academician’s eyes are almost invisible, and the face seems erased. The intention in the portrait is clear: Sarra Lebedeva showed how the late Shchusev in 1949 is “breaking away” from his contemporaries, dissolving. And this indefiniteness and this vagueness feel as if they were “stuck” to Shchusev. Either he is a brilliant architect, or a talented administrator, or he fully revealed himself in the church era, or in the avant-garde, or in the Stalinist period. However, the exhibition shows that there were more than just three “reference points”. Perhaps it will become the beginning or the “driver” of a new level of research that will someday explain what kind of person the academician was. Or, conversely, after all the material is collected and analyzed, questions will remain open, and that’s okay.

Meanwhile, although Alksey Shchusev may not have been the sole founder of the Museum of Architecture, he seems to have been the person responsible for placing the museum in the center of Moscow and turning it into a truly significant, exceptionally valuable repository of information on the history of architecture. Honestly, it’s not for the Mausoleum but for the State Research Institute of Art History, Architecture, and Urban Studies that he deserves to have a monument erected in his honor.

Architect:
Sergei Tchoban

30 October 2023

Headlines now
Living in the Architecture of One’s Own Making
Do architects design houses for themselves? You bet! In this article, we are examining a new book by TATLIN publishing house. This book – unprecedented for Russia – features 52 private homes designed and built by contemporary architects for themselves. It includes houses that are famous, even iconic, as well as lesser-known ones; large and small, stylish and eccentric. To some extent, the book reflects the history of Russian architecture over the past 30 years.
A City Block Isoline
Another competition project for a residential complex on the banks of the Volga in Nizhny Novgorod has been prepared by Studio 44. A team of architects led by Ivan Kozhin concluded that using a regular block layout in such a location would be inappropriate and developed a “custom design” approach: a chain of parceled multi-section buildings stretching along the entire embankment. Let’s explore the features and advantages of this unconventional method.
Competition: The Price of Creativity?
Any day now, we’re expecting the results of a competition held by the “Samolet” development group for a plot in Kommunarka. In the meantime, we share the impressions of Editor-in-Chief Julia Tarabarina, who managed to conduct a public talk. Though technically focused on the interaction between developers and architects, the public talk turned into a discussion about the pros and cons of architectural competitions.
Terraced Design
The “River Park” residential complex has confidently and securely shaped the Nagatinsky Backwater shoreline. Featuring a public embankment, elevated courtyards connected by pedestrian bridges, and brick façades, the development invites exploration of its nuanced response to the surrounding context, as well as hints of the architects’ megalithic design thinking.
A Kremlin’s Core and Meteorite Fragments
We continue our coverage of the competition projects for the residential district that the development company GloraX plans to build along the embankment of the Rowing Channel in Nizhny Novgorod. ASADOV Architects approached the concept through a deep dive into local identity, using storytelling to pinpoint a central idea for the design: the master plan and composition are imagined as if a meteorite had struck a “proto-Kremlin”. Sounds weird? Find more details below!
The Volga Regatta
GloraX plans to develop a residential complex spanning 14 hectares along the Volga River in Nizhny Novgorod. The winning design in a closed-door competition, created by GORA Architects, features housing typologies ranging from townhouses to terraced high-rise slabs, a balance of functions, diverse ways of engaging with the water, and even a dedicated island (no less!) for the city residents.
A New Track
We took a thorough look at D_Station, a railcar repair depot dating back to 1906, recently reconstructed while preserving its century-old industrial structure, upon the project by Sergey Trukhanov and T+T Architects. Though work on the interiors – set to house restaurants and public spaces – is still underway, the building’s exterior already offers plenty to see. Visitors can explore the blend of old and new brickwork, appreciate the architect’s unique interpretation of ruin aesthetics, and enjoy the newly built pedestrian route that connects the Citydel Business Center’s arches to Kazakova Street.
Four Different Surveys
The “Explore the City” competition, organized this year by the Genplan Institute of Moscow, stands out as a pretty unconventional one for the architectural field but aligns perfectly well with the character of urban planning work. The winning project analyzed contemporary residential complexes, combining urban planning insights with a realtor’s perspective to propose a hybrid approach. Other entries explored public centers, motivations for car ownership, and housing vacancy rates. A fifth participant withdrew. Here’s a closer look at the four completed works.
Scheduled Evolution
ASADOV Architects unveiled the EvyCenter pavilion, a microcultural hub for fostering personal growth, organizing workshops, and doing gymnastics. Additionally, this pavilion serves as a prototype for a scalable country house, drawing inspiration from the “Loskutok” project, and constructed from CLT panels in a factory. This marks the beginning of a developer project initiated by the architectural firm (sic!), which is seeking partners to expand both small Evy settlements and even larger Evy cities, which are, according to Andrey Asadov, aimed at fostering the “evolutionary” development of the people who will inhabit them.
The Golden Crown
The concept for a dental clinic in Yekaterinburg, developed by CNTR Studio, revolves around the idea of a “mouth full of gold”: pristine white porcelain stoneware walls are complemented by matte brass details. To avoid an overly literal interpretation, the architects focused on the building’s proportions, skillfully navigating between sunlight requirements and fire safety regulations.
Flexibility and Integration
Not long ago, we covered the project for the fourth phase of the ÁLIA residential complex, designed by APEX. Now, we’ve been shown different fence concepts they developed to enclose the complex’s private courtyards, incorporating a variety of public functions. We believe that the sheer fact that the complex’s architects were involved in such a detail as fencing speaks volumes.
A Step Forward
The HIDE residential complex represents a major milestone for ADM architects and their leaders Andrey Romanov and Ekaterina Kuznetsova in their quest for a fresh high-rise aesthetic – one that is flexible and layered, capable of bringing vibrancy to mass and silhouette while shaping form. Over recent years, this approach has become ADM’s “signature style”, with the golden HIDE tower playing a pivotal role in its evolution. Here, we delve into the project’s story, explore the details of the complex’s design, and uncover its core essence.
Gold in the Sands
A new office for a transcontinental company specializing in resource extraction and processing has opened in Dubai. Designed by T+T Architects, masters of creating spaces that are contemporary, diverse, flexible, and original, this project exemplifies their expertise. On the executive floor, a massive brass-clad partition dominates, while layered textures of compressed earth create a contextually resonant backdrop.
Layers and Levels of Flight
This project goes way back – Reserve Union won this architectural competition at the end of 2011, and the building was completed in 2018, so it’s practically “archival”. However, despite being relatively unknown, the building can hardly be considered “dated” and remains a prime example of architectural expression, particularly in the headquarters genre. And it’s especially fitting for an aviation company office. In some ways, it resembles the Aeroflot headquarters at Sheremetyevo but with its own unique identity, following the signature style of Vladimir Plotkin. In this article, we take an in-depth look at the United Aircraft Corporation (UAC) headquarters in the Moscow agglomeration town of Zhukovsky, supplemented by recent photographs from Alexey Naroditsky – a shoot that became only recently possible due to the fact that improvements were finally made in the surrounding area.
Light and Shadow
In this article, we delve into the architectural design of the “Chaika” house by DNK ag architects, which was recently completed in 2023 as part of the collection of signature designs at ZILArt. As is well-known, all the buildings in this complex follow a design code, yet each one is distinct. This particular building stands out not only for its whiteness and minimalism but also for the refined use of a limited number of techniques that, together, create what can confidently be called synergy.
Casus Novae
A master plan was developed for a large residential area with a name of “DNS City”, but now that its implementation began, the plan has been arbitrarily reformatted and replaced with something that, while similar on the surface, is actually quite different. This is not the first time such a thing happens, but it’s always frustrating. With permission from the author, we are sharing Maria Elkina’s post.
Treasure Hunting
The GAFA bureau, in collaboration with Tegola and Arkhitail, organized an expedition to the island of Kilpola in Karelia as part of Moskomarkhitektura’s “Open City” festival. There, amidst moss and rocks, the students sought answers to questions like: what is the sacred, where does it dwell, and what sustains it? Assisting the participants in this quest were landscape engineer Evgeny Levin, artist Nicholas Roerich, a moose, and the lack of cellular connection. Here’s how the story unfolded.
Depths of the Earth, Streams of Water
In the Malaya Okhta district, the Akzent building, designed by Stepan Liphart, was constructed. It follows a classic tripartite structure, yet it’s what you might call “hand-drawn”: each façade is unique in its form and details, some of which aren’t immediately noticeable. In this article, we explore the context and, together with the architect, delve into how the form was developed.
Fir Tree Dynamics
The “Airports of Region” holding is planning to build an airport in Karachay-Cherkessia, aiming to make the Arkhyz and Dombay resorts more accessible to travelers. The project that won in an invitation-only competition, submitted by Sergey Nikeshkin’s KPLN, blends natural imagery inspired by the shape of a conifer seed, open-air waiting spaces, majestic large trees, and a green roof elevated on needle-like columns. The result is both nature-inspired and WOW.
​A Brick Shell
In the process of designing a clubhouse situated among pine trees in a prestigious suburban area near Moscow, the architectural firm “A.Len” did the façade design part. The combination of different types of brick and masonry correlates with the volumetric and plastique solutions, further enhanced by the inclusion of wood-painted fragments and metal “glazing”.
Word Forms
ATRIUM architects love ambitious challenges, and for the firm’s thirtieth anniversary, they boldly play a game of words with an exhibition that dives deep into a self-created vocabulary. They immerse their projects – especially art installations – into this glossary, as if plunging into a current of their own. You feel as if you’re flowing through the veins of pure art, immersed in a universe of vertical cities, educational spaces – of which the architects are true masters – and the cultural codes of various locations. But what truly captivates is the bold statement that Vera Butko and Anton Nadtochy make, both through their work and this exhibition: architecture, above all, is art – the art of working with form and space.
Flexibility and Acuteness of Modernity
Luxurious, fluid, large “kokoshniks” and spiral barrel columns, as if made from colorful chewing gum: there seem to be no other mansion like this in Moscow, designed in the “Neo-Russian-Modern” style. And the “Teremok” on Malaya Kaluzhskaya, previously somewhat obscure, has “come alive with new colors” and gained visibility after its restoration for the office of the “architectural ecosystem” as the architects love to call themselves. It’s evident that Julius Borisov and the architects at UNK put their hearts into finding this new office and bringing it up to date. Let’s delve into the paradoxes of this mansion’s history and its plasticity. Spoiler: two versions of modernity meet here, both balancing on the razor’s edge of “what’s current”.
Yuri Vissarionov: “A modular house does not belong to the land”
It belongs to space, or to the air... It turns out that 3D printing is more effective when combined with a modular approach: the house is built in a workshop and then adapted to the site, including on uneven terrain. Yuri Vissarionov shares his latest experience in designing tourist complexes, both in central Russia and in the south. These include houseboats, homes printed from lightweight concrete using a 3D printer, and, of course, frame houses.
​Moscow’s First
“The quality of education largely depends on the quality of the educational environment”. This principle of the last decade has been realized by Sergey Skuratov in the project for the First Moscow Gymnasium on Rostovskaya Embankment in the Khamovniki district. The building seamlessly integrates into the complex urban landscape, responding both to the pedestrian flow of the city and the quiet alleyways. It skillfully takes advantage of the height differences and aligns with modern trends in educational space design. Let’s take a closer look.
Looking at the Water
The site of Villa Sonata stretches from the road to the water’s edge, offering its own shoreline, pier, and a picturesque river panorama. To reveal these sweeping views, Roman Leonidov “cut” the façade diagonally parallel to the river, thus getting two main axes for the house and, consequently, “two heads”. The internal core – two double-height spaces, a living room and a conservatory, with a “bridge” above them – makes the house both “transparent” and filled with light.
The White Wing
Well, it’s not exactly white. It’s more of a beige, white-stone structure that plays with the color of limestone – smoother surfaces are lighter, while rougher ones are darker. This wing unites various elements: it absorbs and interprets the surrounding themes. It responds to everything, yet maintains a cohesive expression – a challenging task! – while also incorporating recognizable features of its own, such as the dynamic cuts at the bottom, top, and middle.
Urban Dunes
The XSA Ramps team designed and built a three-part sports hub for a park in Rostov-on-Don, welcoming people of all ages and fitness levels. The skate plaza, pump track, and playground are all meticulously crafted with details that attract a diverse range of visitors. The technical execution of the shapes and slopes transforms this space into a kind of sculptural composition.
Proportional Growth
The project for the fourth phase of the ÁLIA residential area has been announced. The buildings are situated on an elongated plot – almost a “ray” that shoots out from the center of the area towards the river. Their layout reflects both a response to Moscow’s architectural preferences over the past 15 years, shifting “from blocks to towers”, and an interpretation of the neighboring business park designed by SOM. Additionally, the best apartments here are not located at the very top but closer to the middle, forming a glowing “waistline”.
The “Staircase” Building
In designing the “Details” residential complex in New Moscow, Rais Baishev spiced up the now-popular Moscow theme of a “courtyard” building with an idea drawn from the surrealist drawings by Maurits Escher. He envisioned the stepped silhouettes and descending slopes as a metaphysical mega-staircase, creating a key void within the courtyard that gave the project an internal “spine”. This concept is felt both in the building’s silhouette and on its façades.
Projection of the Quarter
No one doubted that the building that Vladimir Plotkin designed as part of the “Garden Quarters” would be the most modernist of all. And it turned out just that way: while adhering to the common design code, the building successfully combines brick and white stone, rhythmically responding to the neighboring building designed by Ostozhenka, yet tactfully and persistently making a few statements of its own. This includes the projection of the ideal urban development composition “14–9–6”, which can be found right next door, mathematical calculations, including those for various types of terraces (and perhaps the only reminder of the Soviet past of the Kauchuk rubber factory!), and the white “cross-stitch” pattern of the façade grid.