По-русски

This Beetle Has Flown

The story of designing a business center in the Zhukov (“Beetle”) Drive: a number of attempts to preserve a hundred-year-old cold storage facility, at the same time introducing modern buildings interpreting the industrial theme. The project remained on paper, but the story behind it seems to be worth our attention.

Julia Tarabarina

Written by:
Julia Tarabarina
Translated by:
Anton Mizonov

30 April 2021
Object
mainImg
Architect:
Sergey Nikeshkin
The Beetle office center was designed by KPLN (headed by Sergey Nikeshkin) during a two-year span, in 2019-2020, commissioned by Coldy. The project went through a few stages, three of which had to do with the dilemma of whether to preserve or tear down the “refrigerator” – a brick industrial structure built in the beginning of the XX century. And, if to preserve, then in which format.

The building of the “refrigerator” when the design process began. The Beetle office center. A photograph. The west facade
Copyright: © KPLN


The land site stretches along the Zhukov Drive between the Paveletskaya railroad lines and the Derbenevskaya Street; narrow in its east part, it is almost square in the west, where the “refrigerator” is located. Originally, the project of the business center consisted of two parts: the renovation of the “refrigerator” (according to the 2000 data), which was to become the first stage, and the construction of new office buildings, which was to become the second one.

The Beetle office center. Outlines of the land site
Copyright: © KPLN


The building of the early XX century

The “refrigerator” – a large parallelepiped with a 40x45 meter base and an elevation of the central axis decorated by frontons – was almost completely devoid of windows because they violate the thermal insulation necessary for uniform cooling, which was achieved here through the circulation of air between the floors. The only place that was lit by natural light was the staircase of the main entrance underneath the turret on the west facade, but the entire building was decorated in the spirit of “industrial romanticism”: imitations of windows with bulging fascias, balusters, and cantilevers – all these things visually divided the volume into elements organized in a symmetrical composition, successfully combating the inertia of form.

Later on, the stained-glass window of the staircase was stopped with bricks, and several sloppy windows pierced over the decor. The brick facades right on top of the masonry were covered with yellow heat-insulating foam that looked like lichen from a distance.

The building of the “refrigerator” when the design process began. The Beetle office center. A photograph. The north facade
Copyright: © KPLN


According to the Arkhnadzor records, the building in the Zhukov Drive was built back in the day by the joint-stock company “Astrakhansky Kholodilnik” (“Astrakhan Refrigerator”). The construction probably began in 1915-1916, when the company bought the land, but was apparently finished after the Great October Socialist Revolution (when no private property was allowed).  

Meanwhile, it must be noted that this was not the only cold storage building in the Paveletskaya industrial park: to a certain extent, the architecture of this brick building echoes that of another brick hangar, situated 400 meters to the north at the address of 41c4, Dubininskaya Street (Alexander Frolov, the author of the application for giving this building a status of an architectural heritage site, dated this neighboring refrigerator to 1905–1912 and even, with some probability, attributed it to the master of Northern Art Nouveau Fyodor Fyodorovich von Postels;  more about the preservation project, see here).

Reconstruction: Version 1

The first of the reconstruction versions proposed by the KPLN architects was the most non-invasive in relation to the building of the early XX century, which, according to the project, had to change its function altogether. Due to the fact that a cold storage facility does not need any windows at all, but with an office center it’s the other way around, the architects proposed to make wide openings in the walls, at the same time covering them up with striped ceramic lattices. When viewed from a distance, the volume would look solid and retain the semblance of its former monumental self. It was expected that all the details (light-colored against the brick background) would be repaired and restored , while the rows of vertical recessions would be further drilled and turned into real windows.

The Beetle office center. Phase 1, Stage 1
Copyright: © KPLN


The Beetle office center. Phase 1, Stage 1
Copyright: © KPLN


The expanded underground tier contains an underground parking garage, while the low-ride volumes of the public spaces, which replaced the later-on Soviet additions of the ice-cream factory, are emphasized by the architects in a deliberately brutal way: with black facades and protruding round “chimneys”. 

  • zooming
    1 / 12
    The Beetle office center. Phase 1, Stage 1
    Copyright: © KPLN
  • zooming
    2 / 12
    The Beetle office center. Phase 1, Stage 1
    Copyright: © KPLN
  • zooming
    3 / 12
    The Beetle office center. Phase 1, Stage 1. Plan at +0.000 elevation
    Copyright: © KPLN
  • zooming
    4 / 12
    The Beetle office center. Phase 1, Stage 1. Plan at +3.900 elevation
    Copyright: © KPLN
  • zooming
    5 / 12
    The Beetle office center. Phase 2. Section 2-2
    Copyright: © KPLN
  • zooming
    6 / 12
    The Beetle office center. Phase 2. Section 1-1
    Copyright: © KPLN
  • zooming
    7 / 12
    The Beetle office center. Stage 2. Plan of the site for placing the equipment at +19.650 elevation
    Copyright: © KPLN
  • zooming
    8 / 12
    The Beetle office center. Stage 2. Plan of the 4th floor at +10.200 elevation
    Copyright: © KPLN
  • zooming
    9 / 12
    The Beetle office center. Stage 2. Plan of the 3rd floor at +7.050 elevation
    Copyright: © KPLN
  • zooming
    10 / 12
    The Beetle office center. Stage 2. Plan of the 2nd floor at +3.900 elevation
    Copyright: © KPLN
  • zooming
    11 / 12
    The Beetle office center. Stage 2. Plan of the 2nd floor at 0.000 elevation
    Copyright: © KPLN
  • zooming
    12 / 12
    The Beetle office center. Stage 2. Plan of the -1st floor at -3.800 elevation
    Copyright: © KPLN
 

New buildings: Version 1, Stage 2

The new office buildings of the Beetle were to be placed in the narrow eastern part, along the driveway, east of the “fridge”. The reconstruction was to be Stage 1, new construction Stage 2 of the project. For the new buildings, in 2019 the developer organized a closed-door competition that involved DNK ag, Ostozhenka, and a few other established architectural companies. The concept proposed by KPLN won the competition, and later on preserved its imagery at all of the stages while the company still participated in the project. 

  • zooming
    1 / 3
    The Beetle office center. Phase 1, Stage 2. The competition project, a model
    Copyright: © KPLN
  • zooming
    2 / 3
    The Beetle office center. Phase 1, Stage 2. The competition project, a model
    Copyright: © KPLN
  • zooming
    3 / 3
    The Beetle office center. Phase 1, Stage 1. The competition project, a model
    Copyright: © KPLN


So! The streamlined pitch-black volumes are composed of flexible floor-by-floor bands, receding at the top and bottom: in the first case, this vacates room for the terraces, which smoothly rise towards an operated roof; in the second case, this vacates room for the sidewalks and the land improvement. Interestingly, in the opening of the traversal pedestrian “park” street, the cantilevers were supported by slender metallic columns. At the same time, the recessions of the terraces delicately concealed the height: when viewed from a distance, the top floors are no different than the rest, and, when viewed from a close range, they are invisible, and the height of the street looks smaller than it really is.

The Beetle office center. Phase 3, Stage 2
Copyright: © KPLN


As is the custom with office buildings, there is lots of glass here, even though, in spite of the rounded contours of the volumes, the architects did not plan to use curvilinear glass extensively, and the jagged outline of the top floors looked like some glass angle protractor, making turns in the corners within guidelines. The distribution of glass on the facades depends upon isolation – in the north parts, where there is less light, the stained glass windows are more abundant.

The Beetle office center. Phase 5. The insolation
Copyright: © KPLN


The inter-floor bands are of black metal, the occasional verticals are of dark ceramics, laid with overlaps and looking like medieval black-glazed roof tiles. All these things work together to create an impression partially “geologic” (because the bands of the floors stand out and stand back like some slate formation), and partially industrial, which reads like a logical contextual reference to the history of this place. In general, the buildings look like a mechanism, some kind of conveyor unit, but at the same time they shine, both in the sun and with internal illumination – so this is definitely some kind of post-industrial conveyor, not devoid of glamor combined with a bit of actual brutality. The impression is further supported by the winter 3D renders – but then again, according to the architects, it was the client that chose this season: “because we have winter 2/3 of the year here.”

The Beetle office center. Phase 3. Visualization from the Zhukov Drive
Copyright: © KPLN


The flowing outlines of the volumes were something that the architects resorted to due to the specifics of the land site – Sergey Nikeshkin shares. On the grounds of the complex, there are two round wells of deep sewerage, with a diameter of about 6m. Since moving them to another place was out of the question, the wells had to be bypassed, and this is how the idea of a stepped cantilever indentation arose.  Above the wells, the architects conceived round fountains with a thin layer of recirculated water.

In this particular instance, the bypasses of the well are shown on the example of the fifth and last version of the project, where the new buildings occupy the entire land site but the morphology of the buildings inherits the principles of the 1st version of Stage 2: 

zooming
The Beetle office center. Phase 5 (in which the new construction occupies the whole of the land site). The north facade
Copyright: © KPLN


The black-glass, streamlined and faceted, from a distance somewhat “pot-bellied” buildings, in addition to the obvious “industrial” imagery, may also seem to be an interpretation of the romantic and at the same time contextual name of “Beetle”. The glass elements on the corners are like transparent wings, the black frames are like chitinous flaps, and the evening glow reminds of fireflies. The comparison is not literal, of course, but the resemblance is there, as if a giant metallic transformer beetle landed next to the old brick hangar. The architects interpreted this proximity as a contrast between the old and the new: the cold storage is half the height of the new buildings, it is all brick with white details, whilst the new office buildings are black, glass, and streamlined.

  • zooming
    1 / 10
    The Beetle office center. Phase 5. The north facade
    Copyright: © KPLN
  • zooming
    2 / 10
    The Beetle office center. Stage 3, Phase 5. The entrance group
    Copyright: © KPLN
  • zooming
    3 / 10
    The Beetle office center. Phase 3. The car park
    Copyright: © KPLN
  • zooming
    4 / 10
    The Beetle office center. Phase 3. Plan of the 1st floor at 0,000 elevation
    Copyright: © KPLN
  • zooming
    5 / 10
    The Beetle office center. Phase 3. Plan of the 5th floor at +15,000 elevation
    Copyright: © KPLN
  • zooming
    6 / 10
    The Beetle office center. Phase 3. Plan of the 12th floor at +40,500 elevation
    Copyright: © KPLN
  • zooming
    7 / 10
    The Beetle office center. Phase 3. Plan of the 13th floor at +43,800 elevation
    Copyright: © KPLN
  • zooming
    8 / 10
    The Beetle office center. Phase 3. The roof plan
    Copyright: © KPLN
  • zooming
    9 / 10
    The Beetle office center. Phase 3. Section 1-1
    Copyright: © KPLN
  • zooming
    10 / 10
    The Beetle office center. Phase 3. The hubs
    Copyright: © KPLN


Reconstruction: Version 2

In the second version of the reconstruction project, the details of the refrigerator turned black, and the refrigerator itself grew larger – both was done at the client’s request, the former for the sake of harmony with the modern buildings, the latter for the bigger output of useful floor space, extended in the top floor with a glass mansard. The lattices, proposed by the architects for concealing the windows, were also declined by the client: the windows became just windows. However, the building, although it lost a significant part of the similarity with the historical prototype due to its new function, was still supposed to be preserved in February 2020.

  • zooming
    1 / 8
    The Beetle office center. Phase 2. Visualization of the north facade
    Copyright: © KPLN
  • zooming
    2 / 8
    The Beetle office center. Phase 2. Visualization of the south facade
    Copyright: © KPLN
  • zooming
    3 / 8
    The Beetle office center. Stage 2. Visualization of the east facade
    Copyright: © KPLN
  • zooming
    4 / 8
    The Beetle office center. Stage 2. Visualization of the west facade
    Copyright: © KPLN
  • zooming
    5 / 8
    The Beetle office center. Stage 2. The south facade
    Copyright: © KPLN
  • zooming
    6 / 8
    The Beetle office center. Stage 2. The west facade
    Copyright: © KPLN
  • zooming
    7 / 8
    The Beetle office center. Stage 2. The north facade
    Copyright: © KPLN
  • zooming
    8 / 8
    The Beetle office center. Phase 2. A simplified master plan
    Copyright: © KPLN


The final version

In the first half of 2020, the developer asked KPLN to propose an option without preservation of the refrigerator building: it consisted of new buildings with an already specified morphology spread all over the site.

  • zooming
    1 / 7
    The Beetle office center. Phase 1
    Copyright: © KPLN
  • zooming
    2 / 7
    The Beetle office center. Phase 5
    Copyright: © KPLN
  • zooming
    3 / 7
    The Beetle office center. Phase 5
    Copyright: © KPLN
  • zooming
    4 / 7
    The Beetle office center. Phase 5. Plan of the 6th floor, Building 1
    Copyright: © KPLN
  • zooming
    5 / 7
    The Beetle office center. Phase 5.
    Copyright: © KPLN
  • zooming
    6 / 7
    The Beetle office center. Phase 5.
    Copyright: © KPLN
  • zooming
    7 / 7
    The Beetle office center. Phase 5. The pedestrian flows
    Copyright: © KPLN


At this point, the participation of KPLN in the project came to an end – then two completely different concepts came about, called not Beetle but Taller. One of the projects, announced in the summer of 2020, is called Taller Loft, and is already positioned as a housing complex, or, to be more exact, a mixed-use development, combining apartments and offices. The developer did not disclose the authors of the new project, explaining that “Taller Loft is not yet on sale”.  For all intents and purposes, the new project appeared in summer, while the demolition of the “refrigerator” began in October: on November 10, the Department of Cultural Heritage refused the building its protected status, on November 16, an article by Arkhnadzor was published, then, a week later a few articles to the opposite effect appeared (here, here, and here). Still another project, which, most likely, appeared recently, is now featured on developer’s website – in the form of two office prisms, combining brick verticals with prevalent glass; what it inherits from the fridge is the tower before the west facade – one can hardly tell if it is preserved or (which is more probable) reconstructed.  

***

One should say that the transformations of the Beetle project fit into many modern trends; they can even be interpreted as a kind of guideline for step-by-step development: first, maximum preservation, then compromise preservation, then modern construction, then a new project combined with housing. In a sense, this story repeats on a miniature scale the story of developing the Paveletskaya industrial estate: a while ago, it was the territory of new offices and redevelopments of old factories. During the early days of turning unused factory buildings into offices, they even had guided tours here. Over the recent years, the prevailing typology of new projects shifted in the “housing” direction, and the scale became huge.  South of the southern border of the Beetle business center, which was once owned by the German chemical factory Fabwerke, PIK development is building a high-rise housing complex, while three hundred meters to the north, on the Letnikovskaya Street, a large-scale housing complex for Pioneer Development is being built. The history of designing the Beetle business center – from “loft” redevelopment with preserving the historical building to completely new construction with a small share (we do not know exactly how big) of the housing typology – generally repeats the trends inherent to this industrial park on the whole.

One must say that cold storage facilities are not really lucky in terms of reconstruction – probably because they are not just workshops but buildings without windows that require quite a lot of work to change their function. The necessity for punching windows in the walls radically transforms them, hence, questioning the very necessity of preservation: because we either preserve it as it is because its a piece of architectural heritage, or, if we can drill holes in it, we cannot give the building a protected status. Nevertheless, the design experience itself, including an attempt to preserve not only parts of the walls and the volume, but also, especially in the first version, the image of a building from the beginning of the XX century arouses interest and respect. However, the task was very complex, not in the least because of the market conditions.  Hence, it comes as no surprise that the beetle flew away from the Beetle Drive.

Architect:
Sergey Nikeshkin

30 April 2021

Julia Tarabarina

Written by:

Julia Tarabarina
Translated by:
Anton Mizonov
Headlines now
​The Strategy of Transformation
In this article, we are publishing eight projects of reconstructing postwar Modernist buildings that have been implemented by Tchoban Voss Architekten and showcased in the AEDES gallery at the recent Re-Use exhibition. Parallel to that, we are meditating on the demonstrated approaches and the preservation of things that architectural legislation does not require to preserve.
In the Rhythm of Block Construction
Last week, the housing complex “Ty i Ya” (“You and Me”) was presented, built in the northwest of Moscow. By a number of parameters, it exceeds the originally stated comfort-class format, and, on the other hand, fully meeting the city block construction paradigm, popular in Moscow, demonstrates a few interesting features, such as a new kind of public spaces for the residents, and high-ceilinged apartments on the first floors.
​Five Nonlinear Ones
Recently, at the Moscow Urban Forum, they announced a large-scale project that Zaha Hadid Architects would do for Moscow – the multifunctional housing complex Union Towers designed for Quarter 82 of Khoroshevo-Mnevniki at the commission of KROST development.
​Etudes in Glass
The housing complex, located not far away from the Paveletskaya Railway Station, as a symbol of a sweeping transformation of this area: a composition of towers of different height, ingenious detailing of stained glass windows, and a green lawn in the yard.
A Flyover in Watercolor
For the 100th anniversary of Vladimir Vasilkovsky, the architectural office of Evgeny Gerasimov is reflecting on the Ushakov Flyover, which was designed with input from this artist and architect. In this article, we are showing its watercolors and sketches, including the preliminary ones that were not included in the final project, as well as speaking about the importance of architectural drawing.
​Walking on Clouds
A restaurant in the Khibiny skiing complex: 820 meters above the sea level, sweeping views, a levitation effect, and ingenious engineering solutions.
​Transformation with Multiplication
The Palace of Water Sports in Luzhniki is one of the high-profile and nontrivial reconstructions of recent years, and a project that won one of the first competitions, initiated by Sergey Kuznetsov as the main architect of Moscow. The complex opened 2 years ago; this article about it comes out at the start of the bathing season.
​Sergey Tchoban: “I believe it’s very important to preserve this city as a record...
Although originally we planned to speak in this interview with Sergey Tchoban about high-rise construction, the conversation turned out to be 70% about meditation on the ways of regenerating the historical city and about the role of the city fabric as the most objective and unbiased historical record. And, as for the towers, which manifest social contrasts and leave a lot of junk when torn down, the conversation was about the expected construction norms and regulations. We took this interview one day before the Lakhta-2 project was announced, and this is why this newsbreak is not commented upon in any way in this article.
​Courtyards and Constructivism
In this issue, we are examining the second major block of the “city within a city” Ligovsky City complex, designed and built by A-Len, and combining several trends characteristic of modern urban architecture.
​Inside of a Drawn Grid
Designing the apartment complex PLAY in Danilovskaya Sloboda, ADM architects placed their bet on the imagery of construction. The area where it manifested itself the most vividly was the sophisticated grid of the facades.
​Headquarters of the Future
The project by “Arena Group”, which won in an open competition of ideas for the headquarters of the Italian company FITT, combines futuristic forms, an interesting set of functions, energy efficiency, and subtle references to the archetypes of Italian architecture. Particularly beautiful is the “continuous” fountain. In this issue, we are sharing about the three winners of the competition.
​A Tiered Composition
A little bit of New York in Odessa: an apartment complex designed and built by “Archimatika” with towers, townhouses, a square, and swimming pools.
​The Yard Aesthetics
Organizing the yard of a premium-class housing complex, GAFA architects took care not just about the image that matches the project’s high status, but also about simple human joys, masterfully overcoming the construction regulations.
​MasterMind: a Neural Network for Developers and Architects
Created by Genpro, this software allows you to generate within half an hour dozens of development and construction options in accordance with the set parameters. At the same time, however, being more focused on the technical aspects, the program does not exclude creative work, and can be used by architects for preparing projects with a subsequent data export to AutoCAD, Revit, and ArchiCAD.
This Beetle Has Flown
The story of designing a business center in the Zhukov (“Beetle”) Drive: a number of attempts to preserve a hundred-year-old cold storage facility, at the same time introducing modern buildings interpreting the industrial theme. The project remained on paper, but the story behind it seems to be worth our attention.
​The Childhood Territory
The project of the educational complex within the second stage of “Spanish Quarters” was developed by ASADOV Architects. The project is all about creating a friendly and transparent environment that in itself educates and forms the personality of a child.
Man and the City
Designing this large-scale housing complex, GAFA architects accentuated two types of public spaces: bustling streets with shops and cafes – and a totally natural yard, visually separated as much as possible from the city. Making the most out of the contrast, both work together to make the life of the residents of EVER housing complex eventful and diverse.
​Andy Snow: “I aim for an architecture which is rational and poetic”
The British architect Andy Snow has recently become the chief architect at GENPRO Architects & Engineers. Projects, which Andy Snow did in the UK in collaboration with world-famous architectural firms, scored numerous international awards. In Russia, the architect took part in designing Moscow’s Stanislavsky Factory business center, iLove housing complex, and AFI2B business center on the 2nd Brestskaya Street. In our interview, Andy Snow compared the construction realities in Russia and the UK, and also shared his vision of architectural prospects in Russia.
​The Living Growth
The grand-scale housing complex AFI PARK Vorontsovsky in Moscow’s southwest consists of four towers, a “slab” house, and a kindergarten building. Interestingly, the plastique of the residential buildings is quite active – they seem to be growing before your eyes, responding to the natural context, and first of all opening the views of the nearby park. As for the kindergarten building, it is cute and lyrical, like a little sugar house.
Sergey Skuratov: “A skyscraper is a balance of technology, economic performance, and aesthetic...
In March, two buildings of the Capital Towers complex were built up to a 300-meter elevation mark. In this issue, we are speaking to the creator of Moscow’s cutting-edge skyscrapers: about heights and proportions, technologies and economics, laconicism and beauty of superslim houses, and about the boldest architectural proposal of recent years – the Le Corbusier Tower above the Tsentrosoyuz building.
​The Red Building
The area of Novoslobodskaya has received Maison Rouge – an apartment complex designed by ADM, which continues the wave of renovation, started by the Atmosphere business center, from the side of the Palikha Street.
​The Uplifting Effect
The project of Ostankino Business Park was developed for the land site lying between two metro stations (one operating and the other in construction), and because of that its public space is designed to equally cater for the city people and the office workers. The complex stands every chance of becoming the catalyst for development of the Butyrsky area.
​Binary Opposition
In this article, we are examining a rather rare and interesting case – two projects by Evgeny Gerasimov situated on one street and completed with a five years’ difference, presenting the perfect example of example for analyzing the overall trends and approaches practiced by the architectural company.
Raising the Yard
The housing complex Renome consists of two buildings: a modern stone house and a red-brick factory building of the end of the XIX century, reconstructed by measurements and original drafts. The two buildings are connected by an “inclined” yard – a rare, by Moscow standards, version of geoplastics that smoothly ascends to the roof of the stores lined up along a pedestrian street.
​Hearing the Tune of the Past
The Church of the Beheading of John the Baptist in the park near the Novodevichy Convent was conceived in 2012 in honor of the 200th anniversary of the victory over Napoleon. However, instead of declamatory grandeur and “fanfare”, the architect Ilia Utkin presented a concentrated and prayerful mood, combined with a respectful attitude of this tent-shaped church, which also includes some elements of architecture of orders. The basement floor hosts a museum of excavations found on the site of the church.
​Semantic Shift
The high-end residential complex STORY, situated near the Avtozavodskaya metro station and the former ZIL factory, is delicately inscribed in the contrastive context, while its shape, which combines a regular grid and a stunning “shift” of the main facade, seems to respond to the dramatic history of the place, at the same time, however, allowing for multiple interpretations.
​Yards and Towers: the Samara Experiment
The project of “Samara Arena Park”, proposed by Sergey Skuratov, scored second place in the competition. The project is essentially based on experimenting with typology of residential buildings and gallery/corridor-type city blocks combined with towers – as well as on sensitive response to the context and the urge to turn the complex into a full-fledged urban space providing a wide range of functions and experiences.
​The Fili Duo
The second phase of the Filicity housing complex, designed by ADM architects, is based on the contrast between a 57-story skyscraper 200 meters high and an 11-story brick house. The high-rise building sets a futuristic vector in Moscow housing architecture.
​The Wall and the Tower
The OSA architects have been searching for solutions that could be opposed to the low-rise construction in the center of Khabarovsk, as well as an opportunity to say a new word in the discourse about mass housing.