A Third Scale

On a challenging land site located in the Moscow area, Studio 44 designed the second stage of the Evgeny Primakov Gymnasium – a school with a powerful democratic message and architecture in the spirit of Italian rationalism.

Written by:
Natalia Koriakovskaia
Translated by:
Anton Mizonov

15 November 2019

Object

The Primakov Gymnasium is quite an unusual school. It accepts children starting from three years old, the instruction being given in two languages – Russian and English – starting from the student’s first day at school. Currently, the gymnasium consists of a kindergarten for 225 children and a school for 550 students. The educational institution has a solid reputation; the students are admitted on a competitive basis, and, in spite of its fee-paying education, today the gymnasium cannot accept everyone who is interested. The Principal of the gymnasium, Maya Maisuradze, sees the solution to this problem in developing the school in accordance with the model of Sochi’s “Sirius”: it is expected that about 500 children will be coming here for short-term educational programs from different regions of the country. And, in order to accommodate for that, you need appropriate infrastructure, including the dormitories for the students and residences for the teachers, many of whom are native speakers of English.

“Maya invests so much enthusiasm, intellect, and energy into this initiative of hers – Nikita Yavein says – That you can arguably consider her to be not just the mastermind of this project but also the coauthor of our architectural solution”. We must note here that, for Nikita Yavein, it’s yet another unique school, after Boris Eifman Dance Academy, Saint Petersburg Graduate School of Management, and “Sirius”. Focusing on the most advanced trends in today’s educational process – “multiplication of communications” and “mixing of layers” – brought about a solution based on a multifunctional atrium, a technique that is quite frequently used by Studio 44. The complexities of the land site in Moscow area’s Odintsovo became in this particular instance the starting point for a structure that became as complex as elegant in its logic, imbued, in addition with the “new school” ideology.

zooming — E.M. Primakov Gymnasium, 2nd stage

Copyright: © Studio 44

Currently, the gymnasium is hosted in a three-story building, highly developed and complex in terms of its construction blueprint. Standing against the background of the village of Razdory, consisting predominantly of small private housing projects, it presents a fundamentally new scale of construction. The new building, which will be needed for the development of the gymnasium, is meant, according to the architects’ idea, to introduce a third construction scale – a transitional link between the finely divided private construction and the existing volume.

“Fitting the building into this land site turned out to be more challenging that it was on the Nevsky Prospect – Nikita Yavein shares – We built quite a lot of projects in the historical center of Saint Petersburg, dealing with all sorts of restrictions, but it was the first time that we had to solve so many issues with engineering networks, when small owners struggled for literally every square meter of this land. These problems made us change the project several times”. Eventually, the construction blueprint shrank and took on a complex shape, inside of which the architects were not only able to place everything that they intended to, avoiding over-saturation, but also positioned the functions in an aesthetically pleasing way, observing a certain hierarchy of the educational process.

“We tried to make the most of the geometry of this space and its structure based on the ideology of the modern educational process. I am referring to socialization spaces and spaces for communication, to which the advanced schools attach a lot of importance during even the early stages of education. Children communicate with one another, and they also learn from one another – no more isolation, and it’s also OK if they do make some noise. This playful education format, as well as informal communication with the teachers, is conducive to self-education. And our task was to create the necessary environment for that by means of architecture” – Nikita Yavein explains.

It stands to reason that the space for such total communication, just as the planning center of the school, is the atrium. In addition to the conceptual purpose, it also serves a utilitarian one: a few days in a year it must host about 1300 people – the children, the guests, and the sponsors, coming to the gala events. Building for that purpose a separate auditorium, which would have stood locked up almost 360 days a year, was not an option.

Now, however, this spatial nucleus attracts the functional blocks, scattered “chaotically” around it, expressing this “medium scale” found by the architects. Each of these blocks has a “face” of its own. Science, humanities, fine arts, as well as the entrance lobby, the cafeteria, and the main stage, are all executed with an individual set of architectural techniques, and composition-wise the new building will look like a congregation of several different ones. Their “chaotic arrangement” in actuality has a strict hierarchy encoded in it: the importance of the role that this or that function plays in the educational process will define the “degree of intrusion” of this function into the atrium. For example, Science and Sports look slightly secluded, while the Cafeteria and Humanities are almost completely open to the atrium.

“We designed these volumes, based on the geometry of the land site, rather rigid. Then we determined the degree of their “intrusion” into the atrium, whose size we simply could not “blow up”, and tried to interpret this as some kind of landscape. What we ultimately got was a little village or a little town, whose main facades overlook the “main square”, i.e. the auditorium. These facades are belted by galleries that provide the connection between the premises on the second level, turning into the “spectator balconies” during the events” – comments Ivan Kozhin, the chief architect of the project.

The main element of the landscape is the irregular-shaped staircase, which is also the amphitheater, opening up with its complex geometry towards the stage block. This “forum” staircase is a technique not just popular but virtually obligatory in modern western schools. In this gymnasium, however, it is also laden with its inner function: it is a library with an open book stock, peripheral “hills”, and “grottos” in the shape of terraced “ziggurats”, where one can study and read undisturbed. This extended space is covered by a spongy vesicular structure resting on a forest of slender columns – it looks as if it spreads out and joins the blocks to become a single whole.

Planning-wise, the thematic blocks are rather autonomous, and have individual solutions. The Humanities block, for example, is designed as a congregation of small auditoriums with a small lounge of their own. The Fine Arts block contains a system or halls with upper lights for dancing, playing music, and painting. The habitual corridors between them are nonexistent: the spatial connection is performed directly through the atrium. All of the maintenance functions stay in the basement floor: the utility lines, the cloakrooms, and the bathrooms. The relatively independent third floor is occupied by the teachers’ rooms, and the Principal’s office.

Besides the indoor “square”, the complex also has an outdoor one – the courtyard of the existing gymnasium building. In the solution proposed by Studio 44, it takes on a certain degree of solemnity, which entitles it to a right to be called a square. Here we see the “porticos” of the lobby and stage blocks, which connect the school’s outdoor and indoor spaces.

The grand lobby is essentially a paraphrase of the antique peripter, which liberally “scatters” the columns around the light glass volume and thus indicates that the educational process here is far from classical. The Stage block, situated nearby (and the Stage can work both for the indoor and the outdoor squares), by contrast, looks very massive because it is made of brick. It goes outside in a powerful flare in the spirit of the Italian rationalists Adalberto Libera or Giuseppe Terragni. At the same time, however, the portal is interpreted asymmetrically, as if hinting at some “democratization” of classic, freedom of interpretation, and the absence of habitual classic patterns in this school. For example, the glazed volume of the staircase on the one side is echoed by an array of columns on the other.

In spite of the vastly different techniques, all of these solutions look as if they comply with a single code: this a deliberately increased scale that emphasizes its pylons, and a contrastive combination of brick and glass. The most remote Sports block is something like a transition to the round building of the teachers’ dormitory that stands at the edge of the site. It gets circular windows and windows whose outlines resemble the “thermal” ones and look as if they were preparing the observer for the appearance of a “radical” mini-Coliseum.

Situated in the northern part of the territory, the students’ dormitories are more traditional and rectangular. While the “Coliseum” is interpreted as a large-scale “Roman” form, the architecture of these square-type dormitories is ostentatiously modern. It has both “countryside” look about it, as well as something Scandinavian, probably inspired by the special kind of wooden board, widely used in the settlement. But then again, the inner structure is the same everywhere around here: the premises are grouped around small-sizes lounges or atriums, overlooking them with galleries or balconies.

The environment that urges the students to communicate and interact with each other is not limited to the walls of the complex and spills over to the surrounding landscape, pierced with pedestrian and bicycle trails. Presenting the Studio 44 project at the recent Zodchestvo Festival, the chief architect of the Moscow area, Alexandra Kuzmina, noted that solving this challenging task and making the project fit in so nicely with the context was only possible by finding the right scale of things, which the architects were able to do quite successfully. Yet another proof of that is the fact that the project got shortlisted by WAF, a festival where Nikita Yavein is spotted with unfailing regularity.

15 November 2019

Headlines now

Object

The Golden Crown

The concept for a dental clinic in Yekaterinburg, developed by CNTR Studio, revolves around the idea of a “mouth full of gold”: pristine white porcelain stoneware walls are complemented by matte brass details. To avoid an overly literal interpretation, the architects focused on the building’s proportions, skillfully navigating between sunlight requirements and fire safety regulations.

News

Flexibility and Integration

Not long ago, we covered the project for the fourth phase of the ÁLIA residential complex, designed by APEX. Now, we’ve been shown different fence concepts they developed to enclose the complex’s private courtyards, incorporating a variety of public functions. We believe that the sheer fact that the complex’s architects were involved in such a detail as fencing speaks volumes.

Object

A Step Forward

The HIDE residential complex represents a major milestone for ADM architects and their leaders Andrey Romanov and Ekaterina Kuznetsova in their quest for a fresh high-rise aesthetic – one that is flexible and layered, capable of bringing vibrancy to mass and silhouette while shaping form. Over recent years, this approach has become ADM’s “signature style”, with the golden HIDE tower playing a pivotal role in its evolution. Here, we delve into the project’s story, explore the details of the complex’s design, and uncover its core essence.

Object

Gold in the Sands

A new office for a transcontinental company specializing in resource extraction and processing has opened in Dubai. Designed by T+T Architects, masters of creating spaces that are contemporary, diverse, flexible, and original, this project exemplifies their expertise. On the executive floor, a massive brass-clad partition dominates, while layered textures of compressed earth create a contextually resonant backdrop.

Object

Layers and Levels of Flight

This project goes way back – Reserve Union won this architectural competition at the end of 2011, and the building was completed in 2018, so it’s practically “archival”. However, despite being relatively unknown, the building can hardly be considered “dated” and remains a prime example of architectural expression, particularly in the headquarters genre. And it’s especially fitting for an aviation company office. In some ways, it resembles the Aeroflot headquarters at Sheremetyevo but with its own unique identity, following the signature style of Vladimir Plotkin. In this article, we take an in-depth look at the United Aircraft Corporation (UAC) headquarters in the Moscow agglomeration town of Zhukovsky, supplemented by recent photographs from Alexey Naroditsky – a shoot that became only recently possible due to the fact that improvements were finally made in the surrounding area.

Object

Light and Shadow

In this article, we delve into the architectural design of the “Chaika” house by DNK ag architects, which was recently completed in 2023 as part of the collection of signature designs at ZILArt. As is well-known, all the buildings in this complex follow a design code, yet each one is distinct. This particular building stands out not only for its whiteness and minimalism but also for the refined use of a limited number of techniques that, together, create what can confidently be called synergy.

View

Casus Novae

A master plan was developed for a large residential area with a name of “DNS City”, but now that its implementation began, the plan has been arbitrarily reformatted and replaced with something that, while similar on the surface, is actually quite different. This is not the first time such a thing happens, but it’s always frustrating. With permission from the author, we are sharing Maria Elkina’s post.

Report

Treasure Hunting

The GAFA bureau, in collaboration with Tegola and Arkhitail, organized an expedition to the island of Kilpola in Karelia as part of Moskomarkhitektura’s “Open City” festival. There, amidst moss and rocks, the students sought answers to questions like: what is the sacred, where does it dwell, and what sustains it? Assisting the participants in this quest were landscape engineer Evgeny Levin, artist Nicholas Roerich, a moose, and the lack of cellular connection. Here’s how the story unfolded.

Object

Depths of the Earth, Streams of Water

In the Malaya Okhta district, the Akzent building, designed by Stepan Liphart, was constructed. It follows a classic tripartite structure, yet it’s what you might call “hand-drawn”: each façade is unique in its form and details, some of which aren’t immediately noticeable. In this article, we explore the context and, together with the architect, delve into how the form was developed.

Object

Fir Tree Dynamics

The “Airports of Region” holding is planning to build an airport in Karachay-Cherkessia, aiming to make the Arkhyz and Dombay resorts more accessible to travelers. The project that won in an invitation-only competition, submitted by Sergey Nikeshkin’s KPLN, blends natural imagery inspired by the shape of a conifer seed, open-air waiting spaces, majestic large trees, and a green roof elevated on needle-like columns. The result is both nature-inspired and WOW.

Object

A Brick Shell

In the process of designing a clubhouse situated among pine trees in a prestigious suburban area near Moscow, the architectural firm “A.Len” did the façade design part. The combination of different types of brick and masonry correlates with the volumetric and plastique solutions, further enhanced by the inclusion of wood-painted fragments and metal “glazing”.

Report

Word Forms

ATRIUM architects love ambitious challenges, and for the firm’s thirtieth anniversary, they boldly play a game of words with an exhibition that dives deep into a self-created vocabulary. They immerse their projects – especially art installations – into this glossary, as if plunging into a current of their own. You feel as if you’re flowing through the veins of pure art, immersed in a universe of vertical cities, educational spaces – of which the architects are true masters – and the cultural codes of various locations. But what truly captivates is the bold statement that Vera Butko and Anton Nadtochy make, both through their work and this exhibition: architecture, above all, is art – the art of working with form and space.

Object

Flexibility and Acuteness of Modernity

Luxurious, fluid, large “kokoshniks” and spiral barrel columns, as if made from colorful chewing gum: there seem to be no other mansion like this in Moscow, designed in the “Neo-Russian-Modern” style. And the “Teremok” on Malaya Kaluzhskaya, previously somewhat obscure, has “come alive with new colors” and gained visibility after its restoration for the office of the “architectural ecosystem” as the architects love to call themselves. It’s evident that Julius Borisov and the architects at UNK put their hearts into finding this new office and bringing it up to date. Let’s delve into the paradoxes of this mansion’s history and its plasticity. Spoiler: two versions of modernity meet here, both balancing on the razor’s edge of “what’s current”.

Interview

Yuri Vissarionov: “A modular house does not belong to the land”

It belongs to space, or to the air... It turns out that 3D printing is more effective when combined with a modular approach: the house is built in a workshop and then adapted to the site, including on uneven terrain. Yuri Vissarionov shares his latest experience in designing tourist complexes, both in central Russia and in the south. These include houseboats, homes printed from lightweight concrete using a 3D printer, and, of course, frame houses.

Object

Moscow’s First

“The quality of education largely depends on the quality of the educational environment”. This principle of the last decade has been realized by Sergey Skuratov in the project for the First Moscow Gymnasium on Rostovskaya Embankment in the Khamovniki district. The building seamlessly integrates into the complex urban landscape, responding both to the pedestrian flow of the city and the quiet alleyways. It skillfully takes advantage of the height differences and aligns with modern trends in educational space design. Let’s take a closer look.

Object

Looking at the Water

The site of Villa Sonata stretches from the road to the water’s edge, offering its own shoreline, pier, and a picturesque river panorama. To reveal these sweeping views, Roman Leonidov “cut” the façade diagonally parallel to the river, thus getting two main axes for the house and, consequently, “two heads”. The internal core – two double-height spaces, a living room and a conservatory, with a “bridge” above them – makes the house both “transparent” and filled with light.

Object

The White Wing

Well, it’s not exactly white. It’s more of a beige, white-stone structure that plays with the color of limestone – smoother surfaces are lighter, while rougher ones are darker. This wing unites various elements: it absorbs and interprets the surrounding themes. It responds to everything, yet maintains a cohesive expression – a challenging task! – while also incorporating recognizable features of its own, such as the dynamic cuts at the bottom, top, and middle.

Object

Urban Dunes

The XSA Ramps team designed and built a three-part sports hub for a park in Rostov-on-Don, welcoming people of all ages and fitness levels. The skate plaza, pump track, and playground are all meticulously crafted with details that attract a diverse range of visitors. The technical execution of the shapes and slopes transforms this space into a kind of sculptural composition.

Object

Proportional Growth

The project for the fourth phase of the ÁLIA residential area has been announced. The buildings are situated on an elongated plot – almost a “ray” that shoots out from the center of the area towards the river. Their layout reflects both a response to Moscow’s architectural preferences over the past 15 years, shifting “from blocks to towers”, and an interpretation of the neighboring business park designed by SOM. Additionally, the best apartments here are not located at the very top but closer to the middle, forming a glowing “waistline”.

Object

The “Staircase” Building

In designing the “Details” residential complex in New Moscow, Rais Baishev spiced up the now-popular Moscow theme of a “courtyard” building with an idea drawn from the surrealist drawings by Maurits Escher. He envisioned the stepped silhouettes and descending slopes as a metaphysical mega-staircase, creating a key void within the courtyard that gave the project an internal “spine”. This concept is felt both in the building’s silhouette and on its façades.

Object

Projection of the Quarter

No one doubted that the building that Vladimir Plotkin designed as part of the “Garden Quarters” would be the most modernist of all. And it turned out just that way: while adhering to the common design code, the building successfully combines brick and white stone, rhythmically responding to the neighboring building designed by Ostozhenka, yet tactfully and persistently making a few statements of its own. This includes the projection of the ideal urban development composition “14–9–6”, which can be found right next door, mathematical calculations, including those for various types of terraces (and perhaps the only reminder of the Soviet past of the Kauchuk rubber factory!), and the white “cross-stitch” pattern of the façade grid.

Object

Domus Aurea

In this issue, we examine the “Tessinsky-1” house, designed by Sergey Skuratov and completed in 2023. Located in the middle of the Serebryanicheskaya Embankment district, at the intersection of its main streets, this house assumes a sort of “nodal” role: it not only responds to everything around it and preserves many memories of the former EMA factory within itself, but it weaves all this into a newly directed pattern, reconciling bright “gold” and dark-colored brick, largely with the help of the new, modern-yet-archaic Columba brick, which, come to think about it, is the most precious element here.

send.project

The Chimney of Nikola-Lenivets

In this issue, we are examining the “Obelisk House” designed by KATARSIS and built for the Arkhstoyanie 2023 festival. However, it was only finished later on, and this is why we are examining it now. It seems to us that after the “Obelisk House” appeared in Nikola-Lenivets, a dialogue and a few inner connections appeared between the temporary structures built here. These houses no longer look like “accidental neighbors”, more of which below.

Periscope by the Bay

The jury awarded the second place in the competition for a public and cultural center in Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky to the companies GORA (“Mountain”) and M4. In the consortium’s proposal, the building resembles a sperm whale with a calf swimming next to it or a periscope, whose lenses capture the most spectacular views from the surrounding landscape.

Contest Results

From Arcs to Dolmens

While working on the competition project for Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky, ASADOV Architects prioritized the value of the natural and urban environment, aiming to preserve the balance of the location while minimizing the resemblance of the volume that they designed to a “traditional building”. The task was challenging, and the architects created three versions, one of which having been developed after the competition, where their main proposal took third place. However, the point of interest here is not the competition result but the continuity of creative thinking.

Object

Hide and Seek

The ID Moskovskiy house, designed by Stepan Liphart in St. Petersburg, in the courtyards near Moskovskiy Avenue beyond the Obvodny Canal and recently completed, is notable for several reasons. Firstly, it has been realized with considerable accuracy, which is particularly significant as this is the first building where the architect was responsible not only for the facades but also for the layouts, allowing for better integration between the two. On the other hand, this building is interesting as an example of the “germination” of new architecture in the city: it draws on the best examples from the neighborhood and becomes an improved and developed sum of ideas found by the architect in the surrounding context.

The Big Twelve

Yesterday, the winners of the Moscow Mayor’s Architecture Award were announced and honored. Let’s take a look at what was awarded and, in some cases, even critique this esteemed award. After all, there is always room for improvement, right?

Object

Above the Golden Horn

The residential complex “Philosophy” designed by T+T architects in Vladivostok, is one of the new projects in the “Golubinaya Pad” area, changing its development philosophy (pun intended) from single houses to a comprehensive approach. The buildings are organized along public streets, varying in height and format, with one house even executed in gallery typology, featuring a cantilever leaning on an art object.

Report

Nuanced Alternative

How can you rhyme a square and space? Easily! But to do so, you need to rhyme everything you can possibly think of: weave everything together, like in a tensegrity structure, and find your own optics too. The new exhibition at GES-2 does just that, offering its visitor a new perspective on the history of art spanning 150 years, infused with the hope for endless multiplicity of worlds and art histories. Read on to see how this is achieved and how the exhibition design by Evgeny Ace contributes to it.

Object

Blinds for Ice

An ice arena has been constructed in Domodedovo based on a project by Yuri Vissarionov Architects. To prevent the long façade, a technical requirement for winter sports facilities, from appearing monotonous, the architects proposed the use of suspended structures with multidirectional slats. This design protects the ice from direct sunlight while giving the wall texture and detail.