Six Projects for the Riverfront Development

As we already reported, the international competition for the development of the town-building concept of the territories adjacent to the Moskva River was won by the consortium headed by "Project Meganom" Bureau. In accordance with the conditions of competition, the winner will be invited as a consultant for the further work on the project.

At the IV Moscow Urban Forum, the results of the competition were personally announced by the Moscow mayor Sergey Sobyanin who gathered the representatives of all the six finalist teams before the central stand of Manezh exhibition center; the mayor said that the most interesting and the most vital proposals - and such, according to the mayor, were there in every proposed concept with no exception - would be used in the further wok on the implementation of the grand-scale plan.

The announcement of the result was preceded by a long meeting of the judging panel that went on, according to one of its members Alfonso Vegara, for more than ten hours. Meanwhile, according to Marat Khusnullin, each of the judges noted in their personal voting the project prepared by the team of "Meganom" that thus got really far ahead of the other competitors. Khusnullin also promised that some of the ideas would be implemented in the nearest future.

Sergey Kuznetsov
Chief architect of Moscow
about the competition and about the Moskva River
"I want to say that this is the largest urban planning competition, since the project covers more than ten thousand hectares of the territory, of about 10% of the entire territory of old Moscow. For the participation, we invited the world's best town-building teams, because of which we obtained the colossal base of the ideas that are really valuable for the further development of the city. The Moskva River must become a new central street of this city - like the Neva in Saint Petersburg. It is very important here to think over not only general town-building concept but also the architectural facade of this street. Therefore, the next stage will be a whole series of contests for all the significant objects standing along the Moskva River".

Alfonso Vegara
The Founder and the President of Fundacion Metropoli, a member of the judging panel
bout the decision of the judging panel:

zooming — Press conference in Manezh. Central Stand. Photo © Alla Pavlikova, Archi.ru

“Our session went on for more than ten hours, in the course of which we very thoroughly analyzed and discussed the final presentations, discovering in them an abundance of the ideas very vital for this city - both at the regional level, and at the level of its separate territories. The project of developing the waterfront of the Moskva River is enormous in its scale. At the same time, I was amazed at the very number of diverse proposals that the contestants did on the town-planning, economic, and ecological levels. The contestants are real heroes. They did an amazing job and in such a short time, too, considering the fact that Moscow is one of the world's largest cities. I think that this experience is very important for the development of Moscow. To me, it was interesting to look at all the six projects - each one of them had in it practical, vital, and implementable proposals; therefore the idea to use not just one winning project, but also the proposals from the other teams that will be invited at different stages of our work, makes perfect sense to me”.

Andrew Gnezdilov
The chief architect of Scientific-Research and Design Institute of the General Plan of Moscow
about the winning project:

“The winning project was done by an amazingly strong team. I know Yury Grigoryan very well and I know that he possesses a great quality - the ability to formulate his thought accurately, always staying focused on what's really important. And he focused on the most important urban points, coming up with just right solutions. The concentration of efforts was of the highest type. Many contestants examined different aspects of the issue, attempting to solve these or those particular problems having to do with the water front. Meganom, however, was able to come up with an integrated and focused solution.

And again, I cannot help but note how the participants were able, within such an unbelievably short term, (two months - editor's note) to achieve such amazing results. I must confess that I was only expecting some sort of general overall analysis, while in reality all of our contestants did great research work and finally submitted very profound final proposals".

***

The implementation of the concept will take place in three stages: the first stage will have to do with the implementation of the proposals on the improvement of the waterfront, and it is planned that it will be completed before 2017; the second covers more important town-building tasks - to be completed before 2025; all the work is due to be completed in 2035. We present to your attention the projects of winner of the contest, as well as the projects done by the other five consortiums that participated in the competition.

Project Meganom
Moscow. Ports of the Future

The consortium headed by “Meganom” concentrated its attention on the ports - the portals that unite aqueous, pedestrian, bicycle, and other routes, thus forming “acupuncture of intensification”. The authors also proposed the idea of "ecological islands" that will filter the surface drain: “water flows into the lagoon between the breakwaters and gets purified, simply by going around the island”, and they planted the banks of the "Vodootvodny Kanal" ("Drain Channel"), and even the Kremlin embankment, with aqueous plants, adding a lot of soft water plants to the granite embankments. The plants will also filter and purify the water. As for the district of Strogino, the authors turned it into a sports park consisting of six zones, in the center of each of which there appears a "green building", none of them being exactly alike. Instead of the territory of Moscow City, the architects considered Mnevniki, placing there "Parliamentary Gardens" - ten gardens and parks. In the northern part of the peninsula, the architects reserved a place for the "modern iconic" building of the parliament center. The entrances to the parks, both sport and parliamentary, are expected to be free of charge. At the same time, as far as the territory of the ZIL plant is concerned, the architects re-did, giving it a few improvements and fixes, an earlier project of their own; we will remind you at this point that "Meganom" was one of the winners of the contest of 2012 for the reconstruction of the peninsula , although back then the first place was won by Scientific-Research and Design Institute of the General Plan of Moscow , and later, already in 2014, the territory of ZIL was again declared to be the object of attention - at this time, for participants of the competition for the waterfront of the Moskva River. Besides the main river, “Meganom” also considers the Yauza and Setun rivers.

Yuri Grigoryan
The leader of “Project Meganom”
about the river as the spine of the city:

“Our concept is called “Port of the Future”. We defined our primary goal as considering not only the Moskva River within the confines of the city but also give close attention to the whole system of the rivers with large and small inflows and channels as a single integrated eco-system. Together with the Moskva River, they must become clean, accessible and active.

As far as city is concerned, we conditionally divided it into two parts: the center and the periphery. For the center, we propose softer, ecologically-oriented strategy: public territories along the river and the water-cleaning plants, transferred directly into the granite channels. For the outlying regions of Moscow, the Moskva River is mostly inaccessible to people, and that's why it will be a great idea to create access to the river together with the "ports" of the public areas. Thus, the Moskva River will become the linear center and the spine of thecity. It is important that this should lead to the uniform access to the water from the city's every district. These ports fall into two categories: large, "regional" ones, these being 11 in the making, and small "district" ones, these being 26. In the project, all the teams are required to condider in detail three main areas of Moscow: the Strogino Floodland, the complex "Moscow City", and the territory of the the ZIL automotive plant. We realized that, for Moscow, the main goal is the development of the district of Nizhnie Mnevniki, where the parliamentary center would be relocated. In our project, we called this point "Gardens of Parliament" because it is important to create a park with a parliamentary center, and not the other way around. The project "Planet ZIL" was developed by us within the framework of a different contest. Back then, it was there that we planned to place the parliamentary center. Now the situation has changed but ZIL will still be developing as a city within a city - it is really the size of a fully-fledged city with its own residentiaal buildings, shops, and workplaces. As far as Moscow City is concerned, for this territory we developed one of the large ports - a hybrid type with restaurants, shops, public territories and the so-coveted paring places in it. Together with the addition of the bright color solutions, this port could liven up the rather reserved complex of "Moscow City".

One of the important proposals of our project was the idea to set up a date of a new holiday - Day of the River. We've got the Town Day but we haven't got the River Day This kind of townspeople holiday that includes public sailing of boats, would be able to remind the people that we do have a river in our city".

***

Turenscape + Archpolis
Turenscape International Limited / Russian partners Archpolis and DSK-1
Revival of the River

Turenscape singled out five issues: ecology, transport, social balance, the need for cultural revival, and economic activity. They consider the river as the key element of the structure of the city, and propose the strategy of "anti-planning": the ecology gets an absolute priority over any kind of modernization; environmental considerations are to be considered first before introducing any changes. The new "human-oriented" riverfront transportation network provides for significant speed limits for cars, at the same time introducing ice-skating and skiing trails.

The environmental system of Strogino Floodland is left completely intact. The Krasnopresnenskaya Embankment is transformed into a pedestrian zone, the automotive traffic being routed to the "Year of 1905" and Mantullinskaya streets. Along the river, the authors propose to create park terraces, an amphitheatre with the flooring and other zones of leisure. The territory of the ZIL plant gets coverted into a green zone or “Social Factory”. Besides the recreation areas, the architect also create the "Science and Technology" and "Fine Arts" institutes, as well as a tower with residential, commercial, hotel, recreational, and public segments.

***

Burgos&Garrido + Citymakers
Burgos&Garrido / Russian partner - Citymakers
Linear "flowing" center on the Moskva River: from archipelago to mosaic

Without dividing the territory of the riverfront of the Moskva River into zones or areas, the architects propose to mix a few functional scenarios in one "layered" land plot, each with its landmaark building that would attraact the people from other areas of Moscow. The “Laminar” or "layered" system will make it possible to reorganize the territory gradually, and each zone will be immediately provided with all the necessary services.

The authors propose the creation of new transport interchange hubs, a new unit of ground-based transportation, metro, and a network of parkings. The water transport is expected to develop at the expense of the construction of new quays and marinas that will also function as the recreational spaces. The natural scenery of the Strogino Floodland also gets pedestrian and bicycle trails, as well as some small-size service points. The restored buildings of the ZIL plant are saturated with the business and social functions and continue the industrial aesthetics of the place in their new facades and public territories.

***

Maxwan + Atrium
Maxwan architects + urbanists / "Atrium" Bureau
Rediscovering the Moskva River

Maxwan bases the ideology of the project on the following four cornerstones: developing the network of pedestrian and bicycle trails together with the public transportation; creating the landmarks that would reflect "the spirit of the place"; transformation of the problem territories; rivival of the natural waterfont, a few other specific areas of the Moskva River, and creating the green corridors. The authors propose to improve the water transportation, and to create interchange transport hubs next to the river, thus ensuring the connection between the different types of transport.

The natural environment of the Strogino Floodland is kept intact together with the developement of the bicycle and pedestrian networks. New apartment houses are placed on the edges of the natural territory. In Moscow City, the architects landscape the embankment, create the landmark centers and territories, and develop pedestrian and bicycle network. At the ZIL plant, Maxwan proposes to create two "boulevard rings" and the "green wedges" starting from the Moskva River embankment and going further inside. The new residential and public buildings will be executed in the industrial style, inherent to ZIL.

***

Ostozhenka Bureau
The Moskva River in every part of the city

"Ostozhenka" treats the river as “the necklace of semantic sections” that connects the territories that are different meaning. The authors place along the river what they call “pedestrian capillaries”, treating the very river as a kind of longitudinal bridge that connects different places of the city. They propose to launch a few new types of barges, which will course along the river from Khoroshevo-Mnevniki to Nagatino: a beach barge, a restaurant barge, a skate park barge, and even a barge with a swimming pool.

Realizing that the updating the pedestrian, bicycle and other positive forms of motion in the zone of the river requires a change of the entire structure of Moscow transport system as a whole, “Ostozhenka” proposes a number of measures: implementation of a "chord-line" system, building of the relief roads of Volgograd and Kutuzovskiy avenues, development of the transport permeability of industrial parks and other closed territories, development of the passenger transport, construction of ropeways and even a new mini-subway.

The Shchukinsky Peninsula in the Strogino Floodland remains natural: the swamps, the willow coppices, the tallgrass meadows, picnics, bathing, eco-tours, moorages, and boats. The left bank of the Moscow City, on the other hand, becomes a highly industrialized area. Two new bridges are proposed; one leading to the Presnenskaya Embankment, the other to the 1st Kransogvardeisky Passage. On the high right bank of the river, i.e., on the side of the existing Kutuzovsky Avenue, the concept provides for a well-organized pedestrian embankment with the terraces and the spectacular view of Moscow City and the urbanized left shore. ZIL is developed on the basis of the old planning axes developed when it was still actually a plant; in the center, there is the neutral park zone. As the top priority, the authors consider the purification of the water in the creek and turning it into a "haven" - altough they say that they do realize that the dream of returning the Moskva River into its former riverbed is unrealistic because of the Zamoskvoretskaya metro line and the transport infrastructure connected with it.

Furthermore, concept “Ostozhenka” provides for expanding the specifications beyond the subject of the Moskva River: the architects focus their attention on 140 plus inflows of the Moskva River, and propose a few versions of development of at least three of them, taking, as an example, the Filka River that now flows in the pipe under the subway line; this river will be opened back again and a park will be organized nearby. “Ultimately, the city will get a hundred rivers instead of just one" - the architects say.

***

SWA + Rozhdestvenka
SWA Group / the Russian partner “Rozhdestvenka” Bureau
A case of poly-centric development, based on the resources of the river.

SWA consider to be of the utmost importance the packing of the road network and the creation of the network of the high-speed transport, whose stops must become the place of attraction for the local residents and help to unite the local people. The architects propose to use the space under the bridges and the flyovers, organizing there public zones for conducting the leisure activities.

The Strogino Floodland will get a lot of sports and entertainment venues (the project even provides for a new theater). The authors propose to cover the Filevskaya subway line and to create above it a “green avenue”, which will help to prolong the united pedestrian network of the embankments of the Moskva River.

The project also provides for the reconstruction of the Filevskaya subway line: the authors propose to cover this line (now it is of the open-air type - translator's note) and to create above it “green avenue”, which prolongs the pedestrian network of the embankments of the Moscow River. The territory of the Moscow City will get a construction of a large amount of residential stock; the lower floors will be given to the commercial functions. A lot of attention is paid to the ZIL plant. The authors propose to route the water to this territory territory, at the same time creating islands with the residential and public sections - the water becomes the basic town-forming factor. The warehouses become multifunctional buildings that perform both office and residential functions. The high-rise warehouse will be converted into a theater and it will become not only the high-rise centerpiece but also a meaningful landmark of this land.

***

12 December 2014

Written by:
Alla Pavlikova,
Translated by:
Anton Mizonov

Headlines now

Review

Living in the Architecture of One’s Own Making

Do architects design houses for themselves? You bet! In this article, we are examining a new book by TATLIN publishing house. This book – unprecedented for Russia – features 52 private homes designed and built by contemporary architects for themselves. It includes houses that are famous, even iconic, as well as lesser-known ones; large and small, stylish and eccentric. To some extent, the book reflects the history of Russian architecture over the past 30 years.

Object

A City Block Isoline

Another competition project for a residential complex on the banks of the Volga in Nizhny Novgorod has been prepared by Studio 44. A team of architects led by Ivan Kozhin concluded that using a regular block layout in such a location would be inappropriate and developed a “custom design” approach: a chain of parceled multi-section buildings stretching along the entire embankment. Let’s explore the features and advantages of this unconventional method.

Report

Competition: The Price of Creativity?

Any day now, we’re expecting the results of a competition held by the “Samolet” development group for a plot in Kommunarka. In the meantime, we share the impressions of Editor-in-Chief Julia Tarabarina, who managed to conduct a public talk. Though technically focused on the interaction between developers and architects, the public talk turned into a discussion about the pros and cons of architectural competitions.

Object

Terraced Design

The “River Park” residential complex has confidently and securely shaped the Nagatinsky Backwater shoreline. Featuring a public embankment, elevated courtyards connected by pedestrian bridges, and brick façades, the development invites exploration of its nuanced response to the surrounding context, as well as hints of the architects’ megalithic design thinking.

A Kremlin’s Core and Meteorite Fragments

We continue our coverage of the competition projects for the residential district that the development company GloraX plans to build along the embankment of the Rowing Channel in Nizhny Novgorod. ASADOV Architects approached the concept through a deep dive into local identity, using storytelling to pinpoint a central idea for the design: the master plan and composition are imagined as if a meteorite had struck a “proto-Kremlin”. Sounds weird? Find more details below!

Contest Results

The Volga Regatta

GloraX plans to develop a residential complex spanning 14 hectares along the Volga River in Nizhny Novgorod. The winning design in a closed-door competition, created by GORA Architects, features housing typologies ranging from townhouses to terraced high-rise slabs, a balance of functions, diverse ways of engaging with the water, and even a dedicated island (no less!) for the city residents.

Object

A New Track

We took a thorough look at D_Station, a railcar repair depot dating back to 1906, recently reconstructed while preserving its century-old industrial structure, upon the project by Sergey Trukhanov and T+T Architects. Though work on the interiors – set to house restaurants and public spaces – is still underway, the building’s exterior already offers plenty to see. Visitors can explore the blend of old and new brickwork, appreciate the architect’s unique interpretation of ruin aesthetics, and enjoy the newly built pedestrian route that connects the Citydel Business Center’s arches to Kazakova Street.

Report

Four Different Surveys

The “Explore the City” competition, organized this year by the Genplan Institute of Moscow, stands out as a pretty unconventional one for the architectural field but aligns perfectly well with the character of urban planning work. The winning project analyzed contemporary residential complexes, combining urban planning insights with a realtor’s perspective to propose a hybrid approach. Other entries explored public centers, motivations for car ownership, and housing vacancy rates. A fifth participant withdrew. Here’s a closer look at the four completed works.

Report

Scheduled Evolution

ASADOV Architects unveiled the EvyCenter pavilion, a microcultural hub for fostering personal growth, organizing workshops, and doing gymnastics. Additionally, this pavilion serves as a prototype for a scalable country house, drawing inspiration from the “Loskutok” project, and constructed from CLT panels in a factory. This marks the beginning of a developer project initiated by the architectural firm (sic!), which is seeking partners to expand both small Evy settlements and even larger Evy cities, which are, according to Andrey Asadov, aimed at fostering the “evolutionary” development of the people who will inhabit them.

Object

The Golden Crown

The concept for a dental clinic in Yekaterinburg, developed by CNTR Studio, revolves around the idea of a “mouth full of gold”: pristine white porcelain stoneware walls are complemented by matte brass details. To avoid an overly literal interpretation, the architects focused on the building’s proportions, skillfully navigating between sunlight requirements and fire safety regulations.

News

Flexibility and Integration

Not long ago, we covered the project for the fourth phase of the ÁLIA residential complex, designed by APEX. Now, we’ve been shown different fence concepts they developed to enclose the complex’s private courtyards, incorporating a variety of public functions. We believe that the sheer fact that the complex’s architects were involved in such a detail as fencing speaks volumes.

Object

A Step Forward

The HIDE residential complex represents a major milestone for ADM architects and their leaders Andrey Romanov and Ekaterina Kuznetsova in their quest for a fresh high-rise aesthetic – one that is flexible and layered, capable of bringing vibrancy to mass and silhouette while shaping form. Over recent years, this approach has become ADM’s “signature style”, with the golden HIDE tower playing a pivotal role in its evolution. Here, we delve into the project’s story, explore the details of the complex’s design, and uncover its core essence.

Object

Gold in the Sands

A new office for a transcontinental company specializing in resource extraction and processing has opened in Dubai. Designed by T+T Architects, masters of creating spaces that are contemporary, diverse, flexible, and original, this project exemplifies their expertise. On the executive floor, a massive brass-clad partition dominates, while layered textures of compressed earth create a contextually resonant backdrop.

Object

Layers and Levels of Flight

This project goes way back – Reserve Union won this architectural competition at the end of 2011, and the building was completed in 2018, so it’s practically “archival”. However, despite being relatively unknown, the building can hardly be considered “dated” and remains a prime example of architectural expression, particularly in the headquarters genre. And it’s especially fitting for an aviation company office. In some ways, it resembles the Aeroflot headquarters at Sheremetyevo but with its own unique identity, following the signature style of Vladimir Plotkin. In this article, we take an in-depth look at the United Aircraft Corporation (UAC) headquarters in the Moscow agglomeration town of Zhukovsky, supplemented by recent photographs from Alexey Naroditsky – a shoot that became only recently possible due to the fact that improvements were finally made in the surrounding area.

Object

Light and Shadow

In this article, we delve into the architectural design of the “Chaika” house by DNK ag architects, which was recently completed in 2023 as part of the collection of signature designs at ZILArt. As is well-known, all the buildings in this complex follow a design code, yet each one is distinct. This particular building stands out not only for its whiteness and minimalism but also for the refined use of a limited number of techniques that, together, create what can confidently be called synergy.

View

Casus Novae

A master plan was developed for a large residential area with a name of “DNS City”, but now that its implementation began, the plan has been arbitrarily reformatted and replaced with something that, while similar on the surface, is actually quite different. This is not the first time such a thing happens, but it’s always frustrating. With permission from the author, we are sharing Maria Elkina’s post.

Report

Treasure Hunting

The GAFA bureau, in collaboration with Tegola and Arkhitail, organized an expedition to the island of Kilpola in Karelia as part of Moskomarkhitektura’s “Open City” festival. There, amidst moss and rocks, the students sought answers to questions like: what is the sacred, where does it dwell, and what sustains it? Assisting the participants in this quest were landscape engineer Evgeny Levin, artist Nicholas Roerich, a moose, and the lack of cellular connection. Here’s how the story unfolded.

Object

Depths of the Earth, Streams of Water

In the Malaya Okhta district, the Akzent building, designed by Stepan Liphart, was constructed. It follows a classic tripartite structure, yet it’s what you might call “hand-drawn”: each façade is unique in its form and details, some of which aren’t immediately noticeable. In this article, we explore the context and, together with the architect, delve into how the form was developed.

Object

Fir Tree Dynamics

The “Airports of Region” holding is planning to build an airport in Karachay-Cherkessia, aiming to make the Arkhyz and Dombay resorts more accessible to travelers. The project that won in an invitation-only competition, submitted by Sergey Nikeshkin’s KPLN, blends natural imagery inspired by the shape of a conifer seed, open-air waiting spaces, majestic large trees, and a green roof elevated on needle-like columns. The result is both nature-inspired and WOW.

Object

A Brick Shell

In the process of designing a clubhouse situated among pine trees in a prestigious suburban area near Moscow, the architectural firm “A.Len” did the façade design part. The combination of different types of brick and masonry correlates with the volumetric and plastique solutions, further enhanced by the inclusion of wood-painted fragments and metal “glazing”.

Report

Word Forms

ATRIUM architects love ambitious challenges, and for the firm’s thirtieth anniversary, they boldly play a game of words with an exhibition that dives deep into a self-created vocabulary. They immerse their projects – especially art installations – into this glossary, as if plunging into a current of their own. You feel as if you’re flowing through the veins of pure art, immersed in a universe of vertical cities, educational spaces – of which the architects are true masters – and the cultural codes of various locations. But what truly captivates is the bold statement that Vera Butko and Anton Nadtochy make, both through their work and this exhibition: architecture, above all, is art – the art of working with form and space.

Object

Flexibility and Acuteness of Modernity

Luxurious, fluid, large “kokoshniks” and spiral barrel columns, as if made from colorful chewing gum: there seem to be no other mansion like this in Moscow, designed in the “Neo-Russian-Modern” style. And the “Teremok” on Malaya Kaluzhskaya, previously somewhat obscure, has “come alive with new colors” and gained visibility after its restoration for the office of the “architectural ecosystem” as the architects love to call themselves. It’s evident that Julius Borisov and the architects at UNK put their hearts into finding this new office and bringing it up to date. Let’s delve into the paradoxes of this mansion’s history and its plasticity. Spoiler: two versions of modernity meet here, both balancing on the razor’s edge of “what’s current”.

Interview

Yuri Vissarionov: “A modular house does not belong to the land”

It belongs to space, or to the air... It turns out that 3D printing is more effective when combined with a modular approach: the house is built in a workshop and then adapted to the site, including on uneven terrain. Yuri Vissarionov shares his latest experience in designing tourist complexes, both in central Russia and in the south. These include houseboats, homes printed from lightweight concrete using a 3D printer, and, of course, frame houses.

Object

Moscow’s First

“The quality of education largely depends on the quality of the educational environment”. This principle of the last decade has been realized by Sergey Skuratov in the project for the First Moscow Gymnasium on Rostovskaya Embankment in the Khamovniki district. The building seamlessly integrates into the complex urban landscape, responding both to the pedestrian flow of the city and the quiet alleyways. It skillfully takes advantage of the height differences and aligns with modern trends in educational space design. Let’s take a closer look.

Object

Looking at the Water

The site of Villa Sonata stretches from the road to the water’s edge, offering its own shoreline, pier, and a picturesque river panorama. To reveal these sweeping views, Roman Leonidov “cut” the façade diagonally parallel to the river, thus getting two main axes for the house and, consequently, “two heads”. The internal core – two double-height spaces, a living room and a conservatory, with a “bridge” above them – makes the house both “transparent” and filled with light.

Object

The White Wing

Well, it’s not exactly white. It’s more of a beige, white-stone structure that plays with the color of limestone – smoother surfaces are lighter, while rougher ones are darker. This wing unites various elements: it absorbs and interprets the surrounding themes. It responds to everything, yet maintains a cohesive expression – a challenging task! – while also incorporating recognizable features of its own, such as the dynamic cuts at the bottom, top, and middle.

Object

Urban Dunes

The XSA Ramps team designed and built a three-part sports hub for a park in Rostov-on-Don, welcoming people of all ages and fitness levels. The skate plaza, pump track, and playground are all meticulously crafted with details that attract a diverse range of visitors. The technical execution of the shapes and slopes transforms this space into a kind of sculptural composition.

Object

Proportional Growth

The project for the fourth phase of the ÁLIA residential area has been announced. The buildings are situated on an elongated plot – almost a “ray” that shoots out from the center of the area towards the river. Their layout reflects both a response to Moscow’s architectural preferences over the past 15 years, shifting “from blocks to towers”, and an interpretation of the neighboring business park designed by SOM. Additionally, the best apartments here are not located at the very top but closer to the middle, forming a glowing “waistline”.

Object

The “Staircase” Building

In designing the “Details” residential complex in New Moscow, Rais Baishev spiced up the now-popular Moscow theme of a “courtyard” building with an idea drawn from the surrealist drawings by Maurits Escher. He envisioned the stepped silhouettes and descending slopes as a metaphysical mega-staircase, creating a key void within the courtyard that gave the project an internal “spine”. This concept is felt both in the building’s silhouette and on its façades.

Object

Projection of the Quarter

No one doubted that the building that Vladimir Plotkin designed as part of the “Garden Quarters” would be the most modernist of all. And it turned out just that way: while adhering to the common design code, the building successfully combines brick and white stone, rhythmically responding to the neighboring building designed by Ostozhenka, yet tactfully and persistently making a few statements of its own. This includes the projection of the ideal urban development composition “14–9–6”, which can be found right next door, mathematical calculations, including those for various types of terraces (and perhaps the only reminder of the Soviet past of the Kauchuk rubber factory!), and the white “cross-stitch” pattern of the façade grid.

Six Projects for the Riverfront Development

In this issue, we are publishing all the concepts proposed by the participants of one of the most prominent contests of the year: one for the development of the riverfront of the Moskva River. [upd: the new pictures “Ostozhenka” bureau]