По-русски

Supermatism in Krasnokazarmennaya Street

The results of the competition for a design-concept of South-Eastern Administrative Okrug’s territory, Moscow. The competition was commissioned by the “MORTON” development center.

18 September 2014
Contest Results
mainImg
The one-phase creative blitz-contest for a design-concept of a district development came to a conclusion. The candidates were to suggest a rebuilding plan for a 9 hectare plot in Krasnokazarmennaya street to replace houses №14 behind Moscow Power Engineering Institute, on the eastern side of “Hammer and Sickle”, that is currently under reconstruction. By the way, it has recently come out, that the former giant-factory will be reconstructed by LDA design.


"Suprematism" project by "8D architects". Photo courtesy by the contest organizers

The land site that is now surrounded with fences and sheds, and overall looks semi-industrial, (although, according to Yandex Maps, not considered as an industrial area) is planned to be completely rebuilt. Nine hectares will be built over with 20 hectares of dwelling space for about 4570 people, a three-story kindergarten, 10 hectares of offices, and over a hectare of ground floor will be allocated for a number of cafes and shops. The maximum building height is 246 feet, the allowable number of floors ranging from 14 to 21. The competition was organized by the Union of Moscow Architects and the Regional Center of Urban Geography for “MORTON” development center. 31 projects took part in the contest, two of which shared the winning entries and eight more were shortlisted. All the ten finalists are published in this article. 

The Winner.
“Supermatism”/8D architects



"Suprematism" project by "8D architects". Photo courtesy by the contest organizers

The base of the project is a pedestrian boulevard – a diagonal axis connecting “Hammer and Sickle” factory and Shosse Entuziastov metro station; from north-east to south-west. The architects placed 18 residential towers along the perimeter of the territory, square on plan and with varying facades. The lower parts of the houses, all of different height, are made of glass. The upper parts are covered with thicker matter. This creates an allusion to stone volumes, levitating on a different distance from the ground. Following the fanciful outline of the plot the towers are turned at different angles which makes an impression of a dance (it also somehow reminds Erick Egeraat’s residential complex “Avant-guard”). The apartments vary from one-room studios to penthouses with terraces. The office complex and the parking lot are stretched along the upper part of the site – Krasnokazarnenniy Drive. 


"Suprematism" project by "8D architects". Photo courtesy by the contest organizers


"Suprematism" project by "8D architects". Photo courtesy by the contest organizers


"Suprematism" project by "8D architects". Photo courtesy by the contest organizers


"Suprematism" project by "8D architects". Photo courtesy by the contest organizers


"Suprematism" project by "8D architects". Photo courtesy by the contest organizers


"Suprematism" project by "8D architects". Photo courtesy by the contest organizers


"Suprematism" project by "8D architects". Photo courtesy by the contest organizers


"Suprematism" project by "8D architects". Photo courtesy by the contest organizers


"Suprematism" project by "8D architects". Photo courtesy by the contest organizers


"Suprematism" project by "8D architects". Photo courtesy by the contest organizers

Second Prize
“Annenhof Park” / Asadov Architectural Bureau



Annenhof Park. Asadov Architectural Bureau. Photo courtesy by the contest organizers

The suggested name of the architectural complex – “Annenhof Park” – reflects the history of the area. This territory neighbored upon the former Annenhof Grove back in the 18th century. And, even though hardly anything is left of it today, some fragments of the grove have been preserved as public gardens. The biggest of them is situated in front of the Military Armored Forces Academy (former Catherine’s Palace) which is about 0,6 miles away from the plot. Lefortovo Park, the remainder of Annenhof on the bank of the Yauza River (also the former park at Golovin Palace, later Catherine’s Palace), is 1,2 miles away from the residential complex. The architects see these green parks as recreational areas for the future dwellers. 

The building complex consists of four groups of buildings in this project: one allocated for the offices and three for dwelling. The office-building looks like a crystal: three polyhedral towers arranged at different angles are united by a single stylobate and are connected to the central spatial axis of the future territory of “Hammer and Sickle” complex. 

The three groups of apartment houses with different numbers of floors are built up as blocks around the perimeter of the yards. Two basements and a ground floor are allocated for parking lots. That’s why the surfaces of the yards are raised higher up than the adjacent territories, which restricts the access of transport.  The green parks and boulevards inside the dwelling complex, as well as the adjacent kindergarten and a number of shops, are separated from the traffic area. 


Annenhof Park. Asadov Architectural Bureau. Photo courtesy by the contest organizers


Annenhof Park. Asadov Architectural Bureau. Photo courtesy by the contest organizers


Annenhof Park. Asadov Architectural Bureau. Photo courtesy by the contest organizers


Annenhof Park. Asadov Architectural Bureau. Photo courtesy by the contest organizers


Annenhof Park. Asadov Architectural Bureau. Photo courtesy by the contest organizers


Annenhof Park. Asadov Architectural Bureau. Photo courtesy by the contest organizers


Annenhof Park. Asadov Architectural Bureau. Photo courtesy by the contest organizers

***
The Projects in the Shortlist

According to the terms of the competition, the eight candidates that have gotten into the shortlist may take part in the coming creative contests and projects of MORTON Group and the Regional Center of Urban Geography. 

Vladimir Kuzmin, Ekaterina Shornikova, Alisa Mamayeva.


Proposal for building over a land site in the South-East Administrative District of Moscow. Vladimir Kuzmin, Ekaterina Shornik, Alice Mamaeva. Photo courtesy by the contest organizers

The residential houses are inserted into four secluded blocks of a rigid orthogonal layout, separated by green boulevards. The office-buildings of the same orthogonal planning are situated closer to Entuziastov Highway and are turned at 45 degrees to the residential quarter these are meant to block the noise of the highway. At the same time the offices are separated from the dwellings by a green area. Tall beacon-towers at the corners of the buildings visually unite them. 


Proposal for building over a land site in the South-East Administrative District of Moscow. Vladimir Kuzmin, Ekaterina Shornik, Alice Mamaeva. Photo courtesy by the contest organizers


Proposal for building over a land site in the South-East Administrative District of Moscow. Vladimir Kuzmin, Ekaterina Shornik, Alice Mamaeva. Photo courtesy by the contest organizers
***
“Archimedes PLUS”


Proposal for building over a land site in the South-East Administrative District of Moscow. "Archimedes Plus". Photo courtesy by the contest organizers

The project suggests three isolated areas. There are extensive sectional residential buildings on the sides of Krasnokazarmenniy drive and “Hammer and Sickle” drive. They hide the seemingly randomly arranged tower houses at the back of the district. An impressively large building adjoins Entuziastov highway and Aviamotorniy drive. Its layout and the facades remind the neighboring Moscow Power Engineering Institute. The third area is seven-, twelve- and twenty-storey Business Center of a rather reserved form and with pristene glazed façades. 


Proposal for building over a land site in the South-East Administrative District of Moscow. "Archimedes Plus". Photo courtesy by the contest organizers


Proposal for building over a land site in the South-East Administrative District of Moscow. "Archimedes Plus". Photo courtesy by the contest organizers

***
Robert Podjapolsky, Alexander Shabanov


Proposal for building over a land site in the South-East Administrative District of Moscow. Robert Podjapolsky, Alexander Shabanov. Photo courtesy by the contest organizers

The district sooner reminds a natural park with its outlines formed by the surrounding houses in this project. The houses – several square towers, a zigzag, books and plates – protect the park between them. The authors suggest the dwellings and offices be mixed in order to stimulate the movement about the central green area and “integrate nature into the everyday life of the townspeople”. 


Proposal for building over a land site in the South-East Administrative District of Moscow. Robert Podjapolsky, Alexander Shabanov. Photo courtesy by the contest organizers


Proposal for building over a land site in the South-East Administrative District of Moscow. Robert Podjapolsky, Alexander Shabanov. Photo courtesy by the contest organizers

***
Vadim Lukin, Oleg Ryzhayev


Proposal for building over a land site in the South-East Administrative District of Moscow. Vadim Lukin, Oleg Ryzhaev. Photo courtesy by the contest organizers

The authors propose a strict functional zoning but, at the same time, preserving the general stylistic concept. The buildings remind the slightly lifted houses of Le Corbusier with support-pillars and roof gardens. 


Proposal for building over a land site in the South-East Administrative District of Moscow. Vadim Lukin, Oleg Ryzhaev. Photo courtesy by the contest organizers


Proposal for building over a land site in the South-East Administrative District of Moscow. Vadim Lukin, Oleg Ryzhaev. Photo courtesy by the contest organizers

***
Konstantin Konovaltsev, Oleg Konovaltsev, Olga Tishenko


Proposal for building over a land site in the South-East Administrative District of Moscow. Konstantin Konovaltsev, Oleg Konovaltsev, Olga Tishenko. Photo courtesy by the contest organizers

The “main characters” in this project are angles. The architects bring out the visual perception of different combinations of acute and obtuse angles to the foreground, both in the plan and in the facades and geometrical outlines of the green areas. The coloring of the fronts makes an interesting contribution to the whole impression: the facades are as if composed of gigantic deformed Tetris pieces. 

The office-buildings stand aside from the dwelling houses and are supposed to keep the highway sounds from disturbing the dwellers. The apartment-houses, on the contrary, are planned at the back of the lot, and are arranged so that the yards and north-facades stay insolated.


Proposal for building over a land site in the South-East Administrative District of Moscow. Konstantin Konovaltsev, Oleg Konovaltsev, Olga Tishenko. Photo courtesy by the contest organizers


Proposal for building over a land site in the South-East Administrative District of Moscow. Konstantin Konovaltsev, Oleg Konovaltsev, Olga Tishenko. Photo courtesy by the contest organizers
 
***
Elena Popova, Vera Betretdinova, Olga Mranova


Proposal for building over a land site in the South-East Administrative District of Moscow. Elena Popova, Vera Betretdinova, Olga Mranova. Photo courtesy by the contest organizers

The concept proposes rather densely arranged houses of a different number of stories with several dominating towers.


Proposal for building over a land site in the South-East Administrative District of Moscow. Elena Popova, Vera Betretdinova, Olga Mranova. Photo courtesy by the contest organizers


Proposal for building over a land site in the South-East Administrative District of Moscow. Elena Popova, Vera Betretdinova, Olga Mranova. Photo courtesy by the contest organizers

***
Yevgeniy  Didorenko, Alexander Shtanyuk


Proposal for building over a land site in the South-East Administrative District of Moscow. Yevgeniy  Didorenko, Alexander Shtanyuk. Photo courtesy by the contest organizers

The dwelling and office territories stand separately in this project. The dwelling area is arranged on the side of Krasnokazarmenniy drive and consists of three towers and two blocks encircling yards. Two office buildings – a square one and a rectangular one – are drawn up to Entuziastov highway. Both of them surround a small courtyard.


Proposal for building over a land site in the South-East Administrative District of Moscow. Yevgeniy  Didorenko, Alexander Shtanyuk. Photo courtesy by the contest organizers


Proposal for building over a land site in the South-East Administrative District of Moscow. Yevgeniy  Didorenko, Alexander Shtanyuk. Photo courtesy by the contest organizers

***
Architectural Bureau “4izmerenie”


Proposal for building over a land site in the South-East Administrative District of Moscow. “4izmerenie”. Photo courtesy by the contest organizers


The rhombus – a figure that gives countless possibilities at creating ornaments and patterns – is taken as the planning unit in this project. The complex consists of numerous towers with rhombus in plan and rounded corners. The front design develops a theme of simple geometrical figures as squares and circles.


Proposal for building over a land site in the South-East Administrative District of Moscow. “4izmerenie”. Photo courtesy by the contest organizers


Proposal for building over a land site in the South-East Administrative District of Moscow. “4izmerenie”. Photo courtesy by the contest organizers

The Judging Panel of the Contest:

•    Nikolay Shumankov, Head of the Jury, the honored architect of Russia, member of the Russian Academy of Arts, the International Academy of Architecture (Moscow Branch), the president of the Union of Moscow Architects;
•    Oleg Kolchenko, Vice President of “MORTON” companies;
•    Dmitry Zotov, Director General of LLC “MORTON Development Center”;
•    Alexander Bogdanov, Director General of LLC “Regional Center of Urban Geography”;
•    Julia Korolyova, Director General of ZAO Control Strategy;
•    Andrey Yarushin, Chief of the Department of LLC “MORTON Development Center”;
•    Vladimir Yudintsev, laureate of the State Prize of the Russian Federation, professor of MArchI, head of “ARTE+” architectural studio;
•    Mikhail Khazanov, professor of MArchI, Vice President of International Academy of Architecture (Moscow Branch), full member of IAA;
•    Sergey Gnedovsky, Vice President the Union of Russian Architects, the honored architect of Russia, Corresponding Member of RAACS;
•    Mikhail Shubenkov, Vice Chancellor of vocational education development of MArchI.      


18 September 2014

Headlines now
Axis of Rotation
One of the installations in the Masters exhibition at Arch Moscow featured a futuristic yet entirely feasible project by Vladimir Plotkin and TPO Reserve – a tower that could be assembled from prefabricated factory-made modules. The concept even incorporates the possibility of slow rotation (!). Using the same module, one could create a residential block, a giant cantilevered “arrow”, or virtually any other configuration you could possibly think of. Let us take a closer look at the module itself.
A New Magazine and a New Ranking
The magazine Expert.Urban has only just appeared, apparently timed to coincide with Arch Moscow. It is published with the support of VEB.RF and Strelka KB. We have not yet had time to read it cover to cover, but the impression so far is that it consists of about eighty percent interviews. It also features a distinctly “Strelka-style” initiative: a ranking of the “Best Architect of Moscow in the 21st Century”. So, who came out on top? Sergey Skuratov. Yuri Grigoryan took second place, and Sergei Tchoban came third.
Oleg Shapiro: “We design life as a whole, in all of its diversity”
Wowhaus has long since outgrown its association with “urban improvement” projects alone. One of its newer directions is neo-industrialization. Another is large-scale master planning. Yet work on Gorky Park is once again underway – only now on a more systematic and far-reaching level. In this interview, we simultaneously revisit Rem Koolhaas, Strelka, and the history of attention to the “urban environment”, while also exploring what exactly Wowhaus is working on today and how the company operates – with its nine divisions and approximately 160 employees.
Red Card for Copyright
The development concept for the territory of Shinnik Stadium in Yaroslavl, prepared by PI ARENA, took second place in an open call competition. The architects proposed a unified structure combining a football arena, a hotel, and the headquarters of PSB Bank, with carefully considered usage scenarios. However, the competition was organized in such a way that the team ultimately chose to forgo the prize money in order to retain their copyright.
CinemaHologram
Not long ago, the Moscow authorities approved the project for a new House of Cinema complex by Kleinewelt Architekten. The original 1968 building could not be preserved – yet the architects managed to save its stained-glass panels, metal reliefs, and even the volumetric parameters of the structure, which will continue to house the Union of Cinematographers and cinema halls. The project’s main focal point, however, will be a residential tower. We examine its sculptural qualities and its allusions within the Moscow context.
Form as Method: TPO Reserve
At the core of the concept developed by Vladimir Plotkin and TPO Reserve lies an unconventional morphology that addresses functional challenges beyond purely formal concerns. Above all, however, it serves expressiveness and creates a rare kind of spatial and emotional experience, as becomes evident when examining the project’s key solutions. We studied it in detail, and it was all worth it. Our interpretation is that what drives this project is neither style nor even metaphor, but rather a method.
Mound of Memory
The competition proposal for a memorial complex on the Pulkovo Heights by Studio 44 will not be realized, yet it deserves attention as an intriguing example of how architecture can symbolize traumatic events and thereby contribute to their processing and integration into human experience. The architects also succeed in combining memorial and recreational functions without slipping either into excessive dramatization or oversimplification. The project develops ideas explored in two earlier competition entries that likewise remained unbuilt – the Museum of the Siege of Leningrad and the Tuchkov Buyan park. It also recalls the mound-like hill that Alexander Nikolsky embodied in the form of the now-lost stadium on Krestovsky Island.
Home Base
Working on the new building for Letovo Junior School – opened to students in autumn 2025 in the MSU Valley – the architects of UNK, following the client’s vision, subordinated both façades and interiors to the theme of “home”. Multiple variations of pitched roofs, a city skyline traced across glass balustrades, wooden textures, and a whole series of micro-spaces for retreat within public areas are all at the disposal of primary and middle school students. We take a closer look at the new school building – and at how it interprets current trends in educational environments.
Doubles Match
The architecture of the Tennis Palace built in Luzhniki Olympic Complex, designed by Arena Design Institute, was shaped by three factors: the proximity of the brutalist Druzhba Arena, the closeness of the Moskva River and the metro bridge overpass, as well as the specifics of the function – tennis courts require large spans, abundant light, yet at the same time protection from direct sunlight. The architects divided the building into several blocks, playing on contrast, which is further emphasized by the façades developed in collaboration with TPO Reserve and Vladimir Plotkin.
Microdynamics of Macroprocesses
Given the proximity of the multifunctional complex SOLOS to Sokolniki Park and to a major transport hub, Kleinewelt Architekten embedded in the design of the two high-rise towers a sense of dynamism more characteristic of natural phenomena than of man-made objects. Without the authors’ diagrams, this logic is not easy to decipher, although the eye immediately detects a pattern and tries to grasp it. It seems to us that one tower contains the impulse of a bud about to open, while the other evokes the movement of a lithospheric plate. Let us try to unravel it together.
The Space of Post-Cubism
Sergei Tchoban and Alexandra Sheiner, of Studio CHART, created for the exhibition of “post-cubist” sculpture by Beatrice Sandomirskaya – a talented and even “mainstream” artist, yet almost unknown even to art historians – a space akin to her sculptural language: solidly built, confidently stereometric, and subtly expressive. It curves, emphasizing the mass of the sculpture, envelops the viewer, and guides them from one perspective to another, from a generic “shrine” to a “Madonna”.
The Value of Open Space
For the site near the Barrikadnaya Metro Station, Sergey Skuratov developed five projects between 2020 and 2025. Two of them were ones that won the client’s invitation-only competitions. The fifth was recently selected by the Mayor of Moscow for implementation. The project is vivid and sculptural, expressive, eye-catching, and engaging – very much in line with the spirit of our time. And yet, this project is mid-rise rather than tall. In its northwestern part, near the metro and Druzhinnikovskaya Street, it shapes a comfortable urban environment. On the opposite side, it opens up, allowing sunlight into the courtyard and creating a spatial pause within the dense city fabric. How it is organized, what geometric principles underlie it, and why it takes this form – all this is explored in our article.
Coming From the Cold
The ArchBukhta Festival remains one of the few events in Russia where participants go through the entire process of creating an architectural object – from concept to construction. And they do so on the shores of Lake Baikal, in dedication to it. This year, GAFA took part and shared its experience: a local legend, a team-specific design code, friendship, as well as ice skating and endurance in freezing temperatures all contributed to gaining something more than just an award.
Symphony of Water and Brick
The Alter residential complex, designed by Stepan Liphart and built on a bend of the Okhta River, is an example of a “drawn house”: the number of original architectural details is virtually immeasurable. As a result, ribs, projections, and recesses create a picturesque silhouette even without a significant variation in height. Both composition and material respond to the proximity of the river and to the red-brick factory building dating back to the early 20th century. The project was also significantly shaped by recommendations from the city’s chief architect. More details in our article.
The Penguin House
The building with a curved façade on Brestskaya Street is one of the manifestos of Russian neomodernism of the early 2000s, a sculpture – this is how Anatoly Belov interprets it, speaking of “breaking from the modernist canon and the contextual approach”. We do not fully agree with the author, but his perspective is an interesting one.
Wave and Vertical
The premium residential complex designed by GAFA for a site in the Khoroshevsky District responds to multiple constraints – the arc of a planned roadway, the water protection zone of the Khodynka River, and insolation requirements – through inventive massing. The composition is built on the interplay of two spatial layers: an elongated perimeter block and three towers concealed behind it generate the silhouette and key viewpoints, while also adding semantic depth reinforced by the façade solutions. Another defining feature is a large private courtyard, complemented by a citywide linear park.
Office on Trubnaya
We continue publishing projects by Valery Kanyashin. A building once described, a quarter century ago, as an example of “quiet modernism” has remained just that in some people’s memory. According to Anatoly Belov, its main quality is its unobtrusiveness. The architects from Ostozhenka say the leading role here is played by context and landscape – the change in elevation. Yet is it really so inconspicuous?
The First International
With this publication, we begin a series of texts dedicated to works by the late Valery Kanyashin, one of the founders of Ostozhenka Architects. As it happens, the projects he was involved in largely illustrate our understanding of the firm and its history. The first project in this series is the International Moscow Bank on Prechistenskaya Embankment.
In Memory of Valery Kanyashin
On Friday, February 27, architect Valery Kanyashin passed away – co-founder of Ostozhenka Architects and the author of many significant buildings in Moscow. We publish a text by Anatoly Belov in memory of Valery Kanyashin.
Hypertext in Space
As part of the exhibition “What We Have We (Do Not) Keep”, Sergey Tchoban, the Museum of Architecture, and the CHART studio experiment with an eco-conscious approach to exhibition design, with thematic cross-references and even with publicistic reflections on the necessity of preserving modernism, the roots of contemporary architecture, and the birth of ideas. All of this makes the exhibition, with its light and transparent design, look quite innovative. The elements – both “material” and conceptual – are familiar, yet their combination is far from conventional.
The Outline of “Foundation”
In their competition proposal for the Fili transport hub, the consortium led by Alexey Ilyin proposed an “inhabited arch” – a form that is simple yet complex. The architects emphasize that even at the competition stage, the project’s feasibility was fully calculated, taking into account the minimal nighttime closures of Bagration Avenue. How was this achieved? With what functions? Let us take a closer look. In our view, the building would have suited the heroes of Isaac Asimov’s Foundation novels perfectly.
The Flying Horizontal
“A house in the spirit of Wright”, as architect Roman Leonidov describes it, pointing to his source of inspiration, was built on a challenging wedge-shaped site. To achieve a sense of intimacy and secure good views from the windows, the entire volume had to be shifted toward the far boundary, turning the house “back” to the neighboring mansions. The main façade demonstrates time-tested techniques often employed by the company: articulated horizontals, a weightless roofline, and a triad of materials – light plaster, dark slate, and warm wood.
Needles of Horizon Contemplation
The “House of Horizons”, designed by Kleinewelt Architekten in Krylatskoye, is carefully thought out at the stereometric level – from the logic of how the volumes interlock (and, conversely, how gaps are articulated between them) to the triangular balconies that give the building its striking, slightly bristling silhouette.
The Red Thread
A linear park project prepared by Alexey Ilyin studio for the improvement of a riverbank in one of the residential districts seeks to reconnect people with nature. Two levels of the embankment invite visitors to contemplate the landscape while at the same time protecting the riverbank from excessive human impact. The “aerial street” links functional zones and the opposite banks, creating new points of attraction along the way: balconies, bridges, and even a “grotto”.
Spindle and Thread
The concept of the Waver residential complex in Yekaterinburg draws inspiration from the past of the Parkovy district. In order to preserve the memory of the late-19th-century flax spinning mill once located here, the architectural company KPLN turns to the theme of textiles and weaving. The project’s main expressive device is a system of ribbons made of perforated weathering steel – a material that, in such volumes, has arguably not yet been used in Russian residential projects.
From Ski Resorts to Year-Round Recreation Clusters
In mid-December, several architectural firms gathered to discuss a “seasonal” topic: the prospects for the development of domestic ski tourism. Where is modern infrastructure already in place, where do only remnants of the Soviet legacy remain, and where is there still nothing – but projects are underway and soon to be completed? This article explores these questions.
Woven Into Sokolniki
Over the past few years, high-rise residential construction in former industrial zones has become the main theme of Moscow architecture. Towers are springing up here and there – but the question is what kind of towers they are. The residential complex CODE Sokolniki, designed by Ostozhenka Architects, is a project where every detail has been taken care of. The authors are attentive to the history of the site, the continuity of the urban fabric, the skyline, and visual corridors. They also proposed a motif with the lyrical name “scarf”. We take a closer look at the volumetric composition and the large-scale décor “woven”, in this case, out of terraces and balconies.
Stepan Liphart and Yuri Gerth: “Our Program Is Aesthetic”
The studio of Stepan Liphart, an architect known for his distinctive signature style and one-off projects, now has a partner. Yuri Khitrov, a specialist with a broad range of competencies, will take on the part of the work that distracts one from creativity but drives the business forward. One of the aims of this partnership is to improve the urban environment through dialogue with clients and officials. We spoke with both sides about their ambitions, the firm’s development strategy, shared values, and the need for pragmatism. And why the studio is called “Liphart & Gerth” only became clear at the very end of the interview.
The Copper Mirror
The varied-toned sheen of “unsealed” copper, painterly streaks and fingerprints, exposed concrete, and the unusual proportions – when you study the ZILART Museum building by Sergei Tchoban and SPEECH architects, there is plenty to talk about. However, it seems to us that the most interesting thing is how the museum’s composition responds to the realities of the district itself. The residential district has been realized as an open-air exhibition of façade statements by contemporary architects – but without public access to the inner courtyards of the blocks. This building – that is, the museum – is exactly the opposite: on the outside, it is deliberately restrained, while inside it shines spectacularly, creating its own sunbeams in any weather.
“Strangers” in the City
We asked Alexander Skokan for a comment on the results of 2025 – and he sent us a whole article, moreover one devoted to the discussion we recently began on the “appropriateness of high-rises” – or, more broadly speaking, “contrasting insertions into the urban fabric”. The result is a text that is essentially a question: why here? Why like this?