По-русски

From Arcs to Dolmens

While working on the competition project for Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky, ASADOV Architects prioritized the value of the natural and urban environment, aiming to preserve the balance of the location while minimizing the resemblance of the volume that they designed to a “traditional building”. The task was challenging, and the architects created three versions, one of which having been developed after the competition, where their main proposal took third place. However, the point of interest here is not the competition result but the continuity of creative thinking.

26 July 2024
Contest Results
mainImg
Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky comprises industrial zones, five-story buildings, low-rise structures, staircases, winds, and “sopkas”, small hills, many of which are extinct volcanoes. The city is beautiful in its own way, but the hills amidst the diverse architecture are the best highlights, sloping, green, and pristine.

Therefore, ASADOV Architects, working last year on the competition project for a cultural and community center on the central square of Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky, focused primarily on the appropriateness of the building within the natural context of the nearby Nikolskaya Sopka.

The place is basically a natural reserve. The hill is very beautiful and sculptural – looking at the pictures, one might think it’s a huge mountain. But in reality, the hill is small, and even a three-story building in front of it will be noticeable. The site is very delicate; if you place a “suitcase” there, the hill will disappear. So, we tried in every way to “dismantle” the building to avoid competing with the hill. Not completely, of course; harsh “deconstruction” would be inappropriate in this case – but we wanted to move away from traditional architecture and create “not quite a building”, but something that looks like it broke off from the hill. We divided the volume into two arcs: one, of lesser height, forms Lenin Square, and the other curves along the base of the hill. This creates a foreground and background: the wings recede into the depth and do not compete with the natural backdrop.

On the roof, we proposed terraces on the bay side and a staircase with an amphitheater to “animate” the building, turning it into a public space that is essentially a continuation of Lenin Square. There is a specific natural and landscape context here: first, the city is located on hills, and people are used to stairs; second, the climate is harsh, often windy and cold, but when the sun comes out, people flock to the square to “catch” it and warm up. We observed how this happens in Lenin Square now, and our terraces and stairs are largely designed to provide additional space for such outings.

In short, we believe the view from the bay side, where the building descends in steps, is the most successful.


A public and cultural center in Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky
Copyright: © ASADOV Architects


A public and cultural center in Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky
Copyright: © ASADOV Architects


  • zooming
    A public and cultural center in Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky
    Copyright: © ASADOV Architects
  • zooming
    A public and cultural center in Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky. Section views
    Copyright: © ASADOV Architects


Interestingly, the amphitheater staircase, with its sharp nose pointing toward the embankment, extends beyond the permitted construction area – but the architects interpreted it as “not a building volume, but part of the square’s landscaping design. There is certain logic in this decision, and it underscores Alexander Asadov’s stated goal of “blending with the space” and becoming part of the environment.

Indeed, Lenin Square, in front of the western part of which the building is designed, is one of the most remarkable centers of the city. Officially, it is indeed its central point, but it is located on a spit separating the bay from Kultuchnoye Lake. Nevertheless, the location remains the city center. Here, not only the Government House, but also the Drama and Comedy Theater is situated, in front of which the city festival “Kamchatka Arbat” is held. Therefore, the space between the hill and the cultural center was conceived by the architects as a pedestrian street – especially since it became clear during the competition, according to the revised brief, that it would have to be car-free – connecting the new building with the square in front of the theater and adapted, among other things, for conducting festivals.

  • zooming
    A public and cultural center in Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky
    Copyright: © ASADOV Architects
  • zooming
    A public and cultural center in Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky. Master plan
    Copyright: © ASADOV Architects


As we can see, the two arcs, one small and one large, converge to form a plan resembling the handwritten letter X. At the point of their intersection on the city side, a “lighthouse” tower emerges, inside which a spiral staircase was planned. From this side, the center looks like a noticeable urban building. It could also serve as a beacon at night, being composed of large triangular bay windows: one opaque plate and one glass plate. During the day, the glass would reflect everything around. The alternating planes and the discrete rotation of the facade arc – more “escaping” from the viewer than presenting itself – also partially work to visually dissolve the volume. At the same time, the end facing the Government House features a narrow vertical window in a broad perspective frame, with one slope serving as a media screen.

A public and cultural center in Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky
Copyright: © ASADOV Architects


  • zooming
    A public and cultural center in Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky
    Copyright: © ASADOV Architects
  • zooming
    A public and cultural center in Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky
    Copyright: © ASADOV Architects


The core of the internal space in the project is a triple-height atrium adjacent to the arc of the façade from the side of Lenin Square. Here, the architects propose a fully-fledged winter garden, highly relevant in the harsh climate, with a visually expanding mirrored ceiling and a large amphitheater, the back of which houses the cloakroom. It echoes the external open amphitheater, mirroring it internally.

  • zooming
    1 / 5
    A public and cultural center in Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky
    Copyright: © ASADOV Architects
  • zooming
    2 / 5
    A public and cultural center in Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky. Plan of the 1st floor at 0.000 elevation
    Copyright: © ASADOV Architects
  • zooming
    3 / 5
    A public and cultural center in Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky. Plan of the 2nd floor at +4.200 elevation
    Copyright: © ASADOV Architects
  • zooming
    4 / 5
    A public and cultural center in Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky. Plan of the 3rd floor at +8.400 elevation
    Copyright: © ASADOV Architects
  • zooming
    5 / 5
    A public and cultural center in Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky. The facades
    Copyright: © ASADOV Architects


The atrium connects two wings – the museum wing on the city side and the restaurant wing on the “sea” side. However, on the first level under the “restaurant” wing, the architects are placing an ethnic culture center. The functional program also includes a children’s leisure center, a food court with seafood dishes, and a multifunctional hall that can serve as the minor theater stage during festivals.

  • zooming
    1 / 5
    A public and cultural center in Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky
    Copyright: © ASADOV Architects
  • zooming
    2 / 5
    A public and cultural center in Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky. Events
    Copyright: © ASADOV Architects
  • zooming
    3 / 5
    A public and cultural center in Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky
    Copyright: © ASADOV Architects
  • zooming
    4 / 5
    A public and cultural center in Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky. Scenarios
    Copyright: © ASADOV Architects
  • zooming
    5 / 5
    A public and cultural center in Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky. 3rd floor
    Copyright: © ASADOV Architects


Different functions in the project have entrances from different sides.

For the final presentation, ASADOV Architects showcased the most “traditional” option, the one, where, in their own words, it was not entirely possible to move away from the traditional “building” concept.

Thus, aside from the final version, a second, more streamlined form emerged, resembling, according to Alexander Asadov, a giant fish.

  • zooming
    1 / 4
    A public and cultural center in Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky. An extra version of the facades
    Copyright: © ASADOV Architects
  • zooming
    2 / 4
    A public and cultural center in Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky. An extra version of the facades
    Copyright: © ASADOV Architects
  • zooming
    3 / 4
    A public and cultural center in Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky. An extra version of the facades
    Copyright: © ASADOV Architects
  • zooming
    4 / 4
    A public and cultural center in Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky. An extra version of the facades
    Copyright: © ASADOV Architects


But that’s not everything. The “momentum” from the creative search during the competition was enough for the architects to create another sketch after the completion – simply to understand what image of the cultural center at the foot of the protected hill they really found appropriate if they had it their own way.

“The restrained image of the final version was dictated by the remoteness of the location and self-censorship in the selection of materials”, says Alexander Asadov. “But if we turned the flat vertical pylons into volumetric ones and pushed them forward from the glass toward the square, it would create a “Stonehenge” – a wild, ancient building, stepping back a thousand years”.

Well, maybe this would have been the right thing to do.

26 July 2024

Headlines now
From Arcs to Dolmens
While working on the competition project for Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky, ASADOV Architects prioritized the value of the natural and urban environment, aiming to preserve the balance of the location while minimizing the resemblance of the volume that they designed to a “traditional building”. The task was challenging, and the architects created three versions, one of which having been developed after the competition, where their main proposal took third place. However, the point of interest here is not the competition result but the continuity of creative thinking.
Hide and Seek
The ID Moskovskiy house, designed by Stepan Liphart in St. Petersburg, in the courtyards near Moskovskiy Avenue beyond the Obvodny Canal and recently completed, is notable for several reasons. Firstly, it has been realized with considerable accuracy, which is particularly significant as this is the first building where the architect was responsible not only for the facades but also for the layouts, allowing for better integration between the two. On the other hand, this building is interesting as an example of the “germination” of new architecture in the city: it draws on the best examples from the neighborhood and becomes an improved and developed sum of ideas found by the architect in the surrounding context.
The Big Twelve
Yesterday, the winners of the Moscow Mayor’s Architecture Award were announced and honored. Let’s take a look at what was awarded and, in some cases, even critique this esteemed award. After all, there is always room for improvement, right?
Above the Golden Horn
The residential complex “Philosophy” designed by T+T architects in Vladivostok, is one of the new projects in the “Golubinaya Pad” area, changing its development philosophy (pun intended) from single houses to a comprehensive approach. The buildings are organized along public streets, varying in height and format, with one house even executed in gallery typology, featuring a cantilever leaning on an art object.
Nuanced Alternative
How can you rhyme a square and space? Easily! But to do so, you need to rhyme everything you can possibly think of: weave everything together, like in a tensegrity structure, and find your own optics too. The new exhibition at GES-2 does just that, offering its visitor a new perspective on the history of art spanning 150 years, infused with the hope for endless multiplicity of worlds and art histories. Read on to see how this is achieved and how the exhibition design by Evgeny Ace contributes to it.
Blinds for Ice
An ice arena has been constructed in Domodedovo based on a project by Yuri Vissarionov Architects. To prevent the long façade, a technical requirement for winter sports facilities, from appearing monotonous, the architects proposed the use of suspended structures with multidirectional slats. This design protects the ice from direct sunlight while giving the wall texture and detail.
Frozen Magma
A competition for the creation of a public and cultural center was held in Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky. Three architectural companies made it to the final, and we consider it important to share about the work of each. Let’s start with the winner – the consortium led by Wowhaus.
Campus within a Day
In this article, we talk about what the participants of Genplan Institute of Moscow’s hackathon were doing at the MosComArchitecture booth at the “ArchMoscow” exhibition. We also discuss who won the prize and why, and what can be done with the territory of a small university on the outskirts of Moscow.
Vertical Civilization
Genpro considered the development of the vertical city concept and made it the theme of their pavilion at the “ArchMoscow” exhibition.
Marina Yegorova: “We think in terms of hectares, not square meters”
The career path of architect Marina Yegorova is quite impressive: MARHI, SPEECH, MosComArchitectura, the Genplan Institute of Moscow, and then her own architectural company. Its name Empate, which refers to the words “to draw” in Portuguese and “to empathize” in English, should not be misleading with its softness, as the firm freely works on different scales, including Integrated Territorial Development projects. We talked with Marina about various topics: urban planning experience, female leadership style, and even the love of architects for yachting.
Andrey Chuikov: “Optimum balance is achieved through economics”
The Yekaterinburg-based architectural company CNTR is in its mature stage: crystallization of principles, systematization, and standardization helped it make a qualitative leap, enhance competencies, and secure large contracts without sacrificing the aesthetic component. The head of the company, Andrey Chuikov, told us about building a business model and the bonuses that additional education in financial management provides for an architect.
The Fulcrum
Ostozhenka Architects have designed two astonishing towers practically on the edge of a slope above the Oka River in Nizhny Novgorod. These towers stand on 10-meter-tall weathered steel “legs”, with each floor offering panoramic views of the river and the city; all public spaces, including corridors, receive plenty of natural light. Here, we see a multitude of solutions that are unconventional for the residential routine of our day and age. Meanwhile, although these towers hark back to the typological explorations of the seventies, they are completely reinvented in a contemporary key. We admire Veren Group as the client – this is exactly how a “unique product” should be made – and we tell you exactly how our towers are arranged.
Crystal is Watching You
Right now, Museum Night has kicked off at the Museum of Architecture, featuring a fresh new addition – the “Crystal of Perception”, an installation by Sergey Kuznetsov, Ivan Grekov, and the KROST company, set up in the courtyard. It shimmers with light, it sings, it reacts to the approach of people, and who knows what else it can do.
The Secret Briton
The house is called “Little France”. Its composition follows the classical St. Petersburg style, with a palace-like courtyard. The decor is on the brink of Egyptian lotuses, neo-Greek acroteria, and classic 1930s “gears”; the recessed piers are Gothic, while the silhouette of the central part of the house is British. It’s quite interesting to examine all these details, attempting to understand which architectural direction they belong to. At the same time, however, the house fits like a glove in the context of the 20th line of St. Petersburg’s Vasilievsky Island; its elongated wings hold up the façade quite well.
The Wrap-Up
The competition project proposed by Treivas for the first 2021 competition for the Russian pavilion at EXPO 2025 concludes our series of publications on pavilion projects that will not be implemented. This particular proposal stands out for its detailed explanations and the idea of ecological responsibility: both the facades and the exhibition inside were intended to utilize recycled materials.
Birds and Streams
For the competition to design the Omsk airport, DNK ag formed a consortium, inviting VOX architects and Sila Sveta. Their project focuses on intersections, journeys, and flights – both of people and birds – as Omsk is known as a “transfer point” for bird migrations. The educational component is also carefully considered, and the building itself is filled with light, which seems to deconstruct the copper circle of the central entrance portal, spreading it into fantastic hyper-spatial “slices”.
Faraday Grid
The project of the Omsk airport by ASADOV Architects is another concept among the 14 finalists of a recent competition. It is called “The Bridge” and is inspired by both the West Siberian Exhibition of 1911 and the Trans-Siberian Railway bridge over the Irtysh River, built in 1896. On one hand, it carries a steampunk vibe, while on the other, there’s almost a sense of nostalgia for the heyday of 1913. However, the concept offers two variants, the second one devoid of nostalgia but featuring a parabola.
Midway upon the Journey of Our Life
Recently, Tatlin Publishing House released a book entitled “Architect Sergey Oreshkin. Selected Projects”. This book is not just a traditional book of the architectural company’s achievements, but rather a monograph of a more personal nature. The book includes 43 buildings as well as a section with architectural drawings. In this article, we reflect on the book as a way to take stock of an architect’s accomplishments.
Inverted Fortress
This year, there has been no shortage of intriguing architectural ideas around the Omsk airport. The project developed by the architectural company KPLN appeals to Omsk’s history as a wooden fortress that it was back in the day, but transforms the concept of a fortress beyond recognition: it “shaves off” the conical ends of “wooden logs”, then enlarges them, and then flips them over. The result is a hypostyle – a forest of conical columns on point supports, with skylights on top.
Transformation of Annenkirche
For Annenkirche (St. Anna Lutheran Church in St. Petersburg), Sergey Kuznetsov and the Kamen bureau have prepared a project that relies on the principles of the Venice Charter: the building is not restored to a specific date, historical layers are preserved, and modern elements do not mimic the authentic ones. Let’s delve into the details of these solutions.
The Paradox of the Temporary
The concept of the Russian pavilion for EXPO 2025 in Osaka, proposed by the Wowhaus architects, is the last of the six projects we gathered from the 2022 competition. It is again worth noting that the results of this competition were not finalized due to the cancellation of Russia’s participation in World Expo 2025. It should be mentioned that Wowhaus created three versions for this competition, but only one is being presented, and it can’t be said that this version is thoroughly developed – rather, it is done in the spirit of a “student assignment”. Nevertheless, the project is interesting in its paradoxical nature: the architects emphasized the temporary character of the pavilion, and in its bubble-like forms sought to reflect the paradoxes of space and time.
The Forum of Time
The competition project for the Russian Pavilion at EXPO 2025 in Osaka designed by Aleksey Orlov and Arena Project Institute consists of cones and conical funnels connected into a non-trivial composition, where one can feel the hand of architects who have worked extensively with stadiums and other sports facilities. It’s very interesting to delve into its logic, structurally built on the theme of clocks, hourglasses and even sundials. Additionally, the architects have turned the exhibition pavilion into a series of interconnected amphitheaters, which is also highly relevant for world exhibitions. We are reminding you that the competition results were never announced.
Mirrors Everywhere
The project by Sergey Nebotov, Anastasia Gritskova, and the architectural company “Novoe” was created for the Russian pavilion at EXPO 2025, but within the framework of another competition, which, as we learned, took place even earlier, in 2021. At that time, the competition theme was “digital twins”, and there was minimal time for work, so the project, according to the architect himself, was more of a “student assignment”. Nevertheless, this project is interesting for its plan bordering on similarity with Baroque projects and the emblem of the exhibition, as well as its diverse and comprehensive reflectiveness.
The Steppe Is Full of Beauty and Freedom
The goal of the exhibition “Dikoe Pole” (“Wild Field”) at the State Historical Museum was to move away from the archaeological listing of valuable items and to create an image of the steppe and nomads that was multidirectional and emotional – in other words, artistic. To achieve this goal, it was important to include works of contemporary art. One such work is the scenography of the exhibition space developed by CHART studio.
The Snowstorm Fish
The next project from the unfinished competition for the Russian Pavilion at EXPO 2025, which will be held in Osaka, Japan, is by Dashi Namdakov and Parsec Architects. The pavilion describes itself as an “architectural/sculptural” one, with its shape clearly reminiscent of abstract sculpture of the 1970s. It complements its program with a meditative hall named “Mendeleev’s Dreams”, and offers its visitors to slide from its roof at the end of the tour.
The Mirror of Your Soul
We continue to publish projects from the competition for the design of the Russian Pavilion at EXPO in Osaka 2025. We are reminding you that the results of the competition have not been announced, and hardly will ever be. The pavilion designed by ASADOV Architects combines a forest log cabin, the image of a hyper transition, and sculptures made of glowing threads – it focuses primarily on the scenography of the exhibition, which the pavilion builds sequentially like a string of impressions, dedicating it to the paradoxes of the Russian soul.
Part of the Ideal
In 2025, another World Expo will take place in Osaka, Japan, in which Russia will not participate. However, a competition for the Russian pavilion was indeed held, with six projects participating. The results were never announced as Russia’s participation was canceled; the competition has no winners. Nevertheless, Expo pavilion projects are typically designed for a bold and interesting architectural statement, so we’ve gathered all the six projects and will be publishing articles about them in random order. The first one is the project by Vladimir Plotkin and Reserve Union, which is distinguished by the clarity of its stereometric shape, the boldness of its structure, and the multiplicity of possible interpretations.
The Fortress by the River
ASADOV Architects have developed a concept for a new residential district in the center of Kemerovo. To combat the harsh climate and monotonous everyday life, the architects proposed a block type of development with dominant towers, good insolation, facades detailed at eye level, and event programming.
In the Rhombus Grid
Construction has begun on the building of the OMK (United Metallurgical Company) Corporate University in Nizhny Novgorod’s town of Vyksa, designed by Ostozhenka Architects. The most interesting aspect of the project is how the architects immersed it in the context: “extracting” a diagonal motif from the planning grid of Vyksa, they aligned the building, the square, and the park to match it. A truly masterful work with urban planning context on several different levels of perception has long since become the signature technique of Ostozhenka.
​Generational Connection
Another modern estate, designed by Roman Leonidov, is located in the Moscow region and brings together three generations of one family under one roof. To fit on a narrow plot without depriving anyone of personal space, the architects opted for a zigzag plan. The main volume in the house structure is accentuated by mezzanines with a reverse-sloped roof and ceilings featuring exposed beams.