По-русски

Supermatism in Krasnokazarmennaya Street

The results of the competition for a design-concept of South-Eastern Administrative Okrug’s territory, Moscow. The competition was commissioned by the “MORTON” development center.

18 September 2014
Contest Results
mainImg
The one-phase creative blitz-contest for a design-concept of a district development came to a conclusion. The candidates were to suggest a rebuilding plan for a 9 hectare plot in Krasnokazarmennaya street to replace houses №14 behind Moscow Power Engineering Institute, on the eastern side of “Hammer and Sickle”, that is currently under reconstruction. By the way, it has recently come out, that the former giant-factory will be reconstructed by LDA design.


"Suprematism" project by "8D architects". Photo courtesy by the contest organizers

The land site that is now surrounded with fences and sheds, and overall looks semi-industrial, (although, according to Yandex Maps, not considered as an industrial area) is planned to be completely rebuilt. Nine hectares will be built over with 20 hectares of dwelling space for about 4570 people, a three-story kindergarten, 10 hectares of offices, and over a hectare of ground floor will be allocated for a number of cafes and shops. The maximum building height is 246 feet, the allowable number of floors ranging from 14 to 21. The competition was organized by the Union of Moscow Architects and the Regional Center of Urban Geography for “MORTON” development center. 31 projects took part in the contest, two of which shared the winning entries and eight more were shortlisted. All the ten finalists are published in this article. 

The Winner.
“Supermatism”/8D architects



"Suprematism" project by "8D architects". Photo courtesy by the contest organizers

The base of the project is a pedestrian boulevard – a diagonal axis connecting “Hammer and Sickle” factory and Shosse Entuziastov metro station; from north-east to south-west. The architects placed 18 residential towers along the perimeter of the territory, square on plan and with varying facades. The lower parts of the houses, all of different height, are made of glass. The upper parts are covered with thicker matter. This creates an allusion to stone volumes, levitating on a different distance from the ground. Following the fanciful outline of the plot the towers are turned at different angles which makes an impression of a dance (it also somehow reminds Erick Egeraat’s residential complex “Avant-guard”). The apartments vary from one-room studios to penthouses with terraces. The office complex and the parking lot are stretched along the upper part of the site – Krasnokazarnenniy Drive. 


"Suprematism" project by "8D architects". Photo courtesy by the contest organizers


"Suprematism" project by "8D architects". Photo courtesy by the contest organizers


"Suprematism" project by "8D architects". Photo courtesy by the contest organizers


"Suprematism" project by "8D architects". Photo courtesy by the contest organizers


"Suprematism" project by "8D architects". Photo courtesy by the contest organizers


"Suprematism" project by "8D architects". Photo courtesy by the contest organizers


"Suprematism" project by "8D architects". Photo courtesy by the contest organizers


"Suprematism" project by "8D architects". Photo courtesy by the contest organizers


"Suprematism" project by "8D architects". Photo courtesy by the contest organizers


"Suprematism" project by "8D architects". Photo courtesy by the contest organizers

Second Prize
“Annenhof Park” / Asadov Architectural Bureau



Annenhof Park. Asadov Architectural Bureau. Photo courtesy by the contest organizers

The suggested name of the architectural complex – “Annenhof Park” – reflects the history of the area. This territory neighbored upon the former Annenhof Grove back in the 18th century. And, even though hardly anything is left of it today, some fragments of the grove have been preserved as public gardens. The biggest of them is situated in front of the Military Armored Forces Academy (former Catherine’s Palace) which is about 0,6 miles away from the plot. Lefortovo Park, the remainder of Annenhof on the bank of the Yauza River (also the former park at Golovin Palace, later Catherine’s Palace), is 1,2 miles away from the residential complex. The architects see these green parks as recreational areas for the future dwellers. 

The building complex consists of four groups of buildings in this project: one allocated for the offices and three for dwelling. The office-building looks like a crystal: three polyhedral towers arranged at different angles are united by a single stylobate and are connected to the central spatial axis of the future territory of “Hammer and Sickle” complex. 

The three groups of apartment houses with different numbers of floors are built up as blocks around the perimeter of the yards. Two basements and a ground floor are allocated for parking lots. That’s why the surfaces of the yards are raised higher up than the adjacent territories, which restricts the access of transport.  The green parks and boulevards inside the dwelling complex, as well as the adjacent kindergarten and a number of shops, are separated from the traffic area. 


Annenhof Park. Asadov Architectural Bureau. Photo courtesy by the contest organizers


Annenhof Park. Asadov Architectural Bureau. Photo courtesy by the contest organizers


Annenhof Park. Asadov Architectural Bureau. Photo courtesy by the contest organizers


Annenhof Park. Asadov Architectural Bureau. Photo courtesy by the contest organizers


Annenhof Park. Asadov Architectural Bureau. Photo courtesy by the contest organizers


Annenhof Park. Asadov Architectural Bureau. Photo courtesy by the contest organizers


Annenhof Park. Asadov Architectural Bureau. Photo courtesy by the contest organizers

***
The Projects in the Shortlist

According to the terms of the competition, the eight candidates that have gotten into the shortlist may take part in the coming creative contests and projects of MORTON Group and the Regional Center of Urban Geography. 

Vladimir Kuzmin, Ekaterina Shornikova, Alisa Mamayeva.


Proposal for building over a land site in the South-East Administrative District of Moscow. Vladimir Kuzmin, Ekaterina Shornik, Alice Mamaeva. Photo courtesy by the contest organizers

The residential houses are inserted into four secluded blocks of a rigid orthogonal layout, separated by green boulevards. The office-buildings of the same orthogonal planning are situated closer to Entuziastov Highway and are turned at 45 degrees to the residential quarter these are meant to block the noise of the highway. At the same time the offices are separated from the dwellings by a green area. Tall beacon-towers at the corners of the buildings visually unite them. 


Proposal for building over a land site in the South-East Administrative District of Moscow. Vladimir Kuzmin, Ekaterina Shornik, Alice Mamaeva. Photo courtesy by the contest organizers


Proposal for building over a land site in the South-East Administrative District of Moscow. Vladimir Kuzmin, Ekaterina Shornik, Alice Mamaeva. Photo courtesy by the contest organizers
***
“Archimedes PLUS”


Proposal for building over a land site in the South-East Administrative District of Moscow. "Archimedes Plus". Photo courtesy by the contest organizers

The project suggests three isolated areas. There are extensive sectional residential buildings on the sides of Krasnokazarmenniy drive and “Hammer and Sickle” drive. They hide the seemingly randomly arranged tower houses at the back of the district. An impressively large building adjoins Entuziastov highway and Aviamotorniy drive. Its layout and the facades remind the neighboring Moscow Power Engineering Institute. The third area is seven-, twelve- and twenty-storey Business Center of a rather reserved form and with pristene glazed façades. 


Proposal for building over a land site in the South-East Administrative District of Moscow. "Archimedes Plus". Photo courtesy by the contest organizers


Proposal for building over a land site in the South-East Administrative District of Moscow. "Archimedes Plus". Photo courtesy by the contest organizers

***
Robert Podjapolsky, Alexander Shabanov


Proposal for building over a land site in the South-East Administrative District of Moscow. Robert Podjapolsky, Alexander Shabanov. Photo courtesy by the contest organizers

The district sooner reminds a natural park with its outlines formed by the surrounding houses in this project. The houses – several square towers, a zigzag, books and plates – protect the park between them. The authors suggest the dwellings and offices be mixed in order to stimulate the movement about the central green area and “integrate nature into the everyday life of the townspeople”. 


Proposal for building over a land site in the South-East Administrative District of Moscow. Robert Podjapolsky, Alexander Shabanov. Photo courtesy by the contest organizers


Proposal for building over a land site in the South-East Administrative District of Moscow. Robert Podjapolsky, Alexander Shabanov. Photo courtesy by the contest organizers

***
Vadim Lukin, Oleg Ryzhayev


Proposal for building over a land site in the South-East Administrative District of Moscow. Vadim Lukin, Oleg Ryzhaev. Photo courtesy by the contest organizers

The authors propose a strict functional zoning but, at the same time, preserving the general stylistic concept. The buildings remind the slightly lifted houses of Le Corbusier with support-pillars and roof gardens. 


Proposal for building over a land site in the South-East Administrative District of Moscow. Vadim Lukin, Oleg Ryzhaev. Photo courtesy by the contest organizers


Proposal for building over a land site in the South-East Administrative District of Moscow. Vadim Lukin, Oleg Ryzhaev. Photo courtesy by the contest organizers

***
Konstantin Konovaltsev, Oleg Konovaltsev, Olga Tishenko


Proposal for building over a land site in the South-East Administrative District of Moscow. Konstantin Konovaltsev, Oleg Konovaltsev, Olga Tishenko. Photo courtesy by the contest organizers

The “main characters” in this project are angles. The architects bring out the visual perception of different combinations of acute and obtuse angles to the foreground, both in the plan and in the facades and geometrical outlines of the green areas. The coloring of the fronts makes an interesting contribution to the whole impression: the facades are as if composed of gigantic deformed Tetris pieces. 

The office-buildings stand aside from the dwelling houses and are supposed to keep the highway sounds from disturbing the dwellers. The apartment-houses, on the contrary, are planned at the back of the lot, and are arranged so that the yards and north-facades stay insolated.


Proposal for building over a land site in the South-East Administrative District of Moscow. Konstantin Konovaltsev, Oleg Konovaltsev, Olga Tishenko. Photo courtesy by the contest organizers


Proposal for building over a land site in the South-East Administrative District of Moscow. Konstantin Konovaltsev, Oleg Konovaltsev, Olga Tishenko. Photo courtesy by the contest organizers
 
***
Elena Popova, Vera Betretdinova, Olga Mranova


Proposal for building over a land site in the South-East Administrative District of Moscow. Elena Popova, Vera Betretdinova, Olga Mranova. Photo courtesy by the contest organizers

The concept proposes rather densely arranged houses of a different number of stories with several dominating towers.


Proposal for building over a land site in the South-East Administrative District of Moscow. Elena Popova, Vera Betretdinova, Olga Mranova. Photo courtesy by the contest organizers


Proposal for building over a land site in the South-East Administrative District of Moscow. Elena Popova, Vera Betretdinova, Olga Mranova. Photo courtesy by the contest organizers

***
Yevgeniy  Didorenko, Alexander Shtanyuk


Proposal for building over a land site in the South-East Administrative District of Moscow. Yevgeniy  Didorenko, Alexander Shtanyuk. Photo courtesy by the contest organizers

The dwelling and office territories stand separately in this project. The dwelling area is arranged on the side of Krasnokazarmenniy drive and consists of three towers and two blocks encircling yards. Two office buildings – a square one and a rectangular one – are drawn up to Entuziastov highway. Both of them surround a small courtyard.


Proposal for building over a land site in the South-East Administrative District of Moscow. Yevgeniy  Didorenko, Alexander Shtanyuk. Photo courtesy by the contest organizers


Proposal for building over a land site in the South-East Administrative District of Moscow. Yevgeniy  Didorenko, Alexander Shtanyuk. Photo courtesy by the contest organizers

***
Architectural Bureau “4izmerenie”


Proposal for building over a land site in the South-East Administrative District of Moscow. “4izmerenie”. Photo courtesy by the contest organizers


The rhombus – a figure that gives countless possibilities at creating ornaments and patterns – is taken as the planning unit in this project. The complex consists of numerous towers with rhombus in plan and rounded corners. The front design develops a theme of simple geometrical figures as squares and circles.


Proposal for building over a land site in the South-East Administrative District of Moscow. “4izmerenie”. Photo courtesy by the contest organizers


Proposal for building over a land site in the South-East Administrative District of Moscow. “4izmerenie”. Photo courtesy by the contest organizers

The Judging Panel of the Contest:

•    Nikolay Shumankov, Head of the Jury, the honored architect of Russia, member of the Russian Academy of Arts, the International Academy of Architecture (Moscow Branch), the president of the Union of Moscow Architects;
•    Oleg Kolchenko, Vice President of “MORTON” companies;
•    Dmitry Zotov, Director General of LLC “MORTON Development Center”;
•    Alexander Bogdanov, Director General of LLC “Regional Center of Urban Geography”;
•    Julia Korolyova, Director General of ZAO Control Strategy;
•    Andrey Yarushin, Chief of the Department of LLC “MORTON Development Center”;
•    Vladimir Yudintsev, laureate of the State Prize of the Russian Federation, professor of MArchI, head of “ARTE+” architectural studio;
•    Mikhail Khazanov, professor of MArchI, Vice President of International Academy of Architecture (Moscow Branch), full member of IAA;
•    Sergey Gnedovsky, Vice President the Union of Russian Architects, the honored architect of Russia, Corresponding Member of RAACS;
•    Mikhail Shubenkov, Vice Chancellor of vocational education development of MArchI.      


18 September 2014

Headlines now
Daring Brilliance
In this article, we are exploring “New Vision”, the first school built in the past 25 years in Moscow’s Khamovniki. The building has three main features: it is designed in accordance with the universal principles of modern education, fostering learning through interaction and more; second, the façades combine structural molded glass and metallic glazed ceramics – expensive and technologically advanced materials. Third, this is the school of Garden Quarters, the latest addition to Moscow’s iconic Khamovniki district. Both a costly and, in its way, audacious acquisition, it carries a youthful boldness in its statement. Let’s explore how the school is designed and where the contrasts lie.
A Twist of the Core
A clever and concise sculptural solution – rotating each floor by N degrees – has created an ensemble of “dancing” towers: similar yet different, simple yet complex. The designers meticulously refined a single structural node and spent considerable effort on the column construction – after that, “everything else was easy”. The architects also rotated the core walls on each floor to maximize the efficiency of the office spaces.
The Sculpting of Spring Forest Matter
We’ve been observing this building for a couple of years now: seemingly simple, perhaps even unassuming, it fits in remarkably well with the micro-district context shaped by the Moscow MCD road junctions. This building sticks in the memory of everyone who drives along the highway, even occasionally. In our opinion, Sergey Nikeshkin, by blending popular architectural techniques and approaches of the 2010s, managed to turn a seemingly simple structure into a statement “on the theme of a house as such”. Let’s figure out how this happened.
Water and Wind Whet the Stone
The Arisha Terraces residential complex, designed by Asadov Architects, will be built in a district of Dubai dedicated to film and television production. To create shaded spaces and an intriguing silhouette, the architects opted for a funnel-shaped composition and nature-inspired forms of erosion and weathering. The roofs, podium, and underground spaces extend leisure opportunities within the boundaries of a man-made “oasis”.
Elevation 5642
The Genplan Institute of Moscow has developed a comprehensive development project for three ski resorts in the Caucasus, which have been designated as special economic zones of the tourism and recreation type. The first of these zones is Elbrus. The project includes the construction of new ski runs, cable cars, and hotels, as well as the modernization of stations and improvements to the Azau tourist meadow. To expand the audience and enhance year-round appeal, a network of eco-trails is also being developed. In this article, we provide a detailed breakdown of each stage.
The IT Town
Taking the example of the first completed phase of the “U” district, we examine how the new neighborhood in Innopolis will be organized. T+T Architects and HADAA formed a well-balanced and ingenious master plan with different types of housing, a green artery, a system of squares, and a park in the town’s central part.
The Heart Lies Within
The second-phase building of the Evgeny Primakov School already won multiple awards while still in the design stage. Now that it’s completed, some unfinished nuances remain – most notably, the exposed ceiling structures, which ideally should have been concealed. However, given the priority placed on the building’s volumetric composition, this does not seem critical. What matters more is the “Wow!” effect created by the space itself.
Magnetic Forces
“Krylatskaya 33” is the first large-scale residential complex to appear amidst the 1980s “micro-districts” that harmoniously coexist with the forests, the river, the slopes, and the sports infrastructure. Despite its imposing scale, the architects of Ostozhenka managed to turn the complex into something that can be best described as a “graceful dominant”. First, they designed the complex with consideration for the style and height of the surrounding micro-districts. Second, by introducing a pause in its tallest section, they created compositional tension – right along the urban planning axis of the area.
Orion’s Belt
The Stone Khodynka 2 office complex, designed by Kleinewelt Architekten for the company Stone, is built with an ergonomic layout following “healthy building” principles: natural light, ventilation, and all the necessary features for an efficient office environment. On the outside, it resembles – like many contemporary buildings – an iPhone: sleek, glowing, glass-and-metal, edges elegantly rounded. Yet, it responds sensitively to the Khodynka context, where the main theme is the contrast between vertical and horizontal lines. The key intrigue lies in the design of the “stylobate” as a suspended passage, leaving the space beneath it open for free pedestrian movement.
Grigory Revzin: “It Was a Bold Statement Made on the Sly. Something Won”
In this article, we discuss the debates surrounding the circus competition and the demolition of the CMEA building with the most renowned architectural critic of our time. A paradox emerges in the process: while nostalgia for the Brezhnev era seems to be in vogue in Russia, a landmark building – the “axis” of the Warsaw Pact – has been sentenced to demolition. Isn’t that strange? We also find out that wow-architecture has made a comeback as a post-COVID trend. However, to make a truly powerful statement, professionals still remain indispensable.
Exposed Concrete
One of the stages of improving a small square in the town of Lermontov was the construction of a skatepark. Entrusting this part of the project to the XSA team, the city gained a 250-meter trick track whose features resemble those of land art objects – unparalleled in Russia in both scale and design. Here’s a look at how the experimental snake run in the foothills of the Caucasus was built.
One Step Closer To the Dream
The challenges of getting all the mandatory approvals, an insufficient budget, and construction site difficulties did not prevent ASADOV Bureau from achieving its main goal in the realization of the school project in the town of Troitsk – taking another step away from outdated notions of educational spaces toward creating a fundamentally new academic environment.
Chalet on the Rock
An Accor hotel in Arkhyz, designed by A.Len, will be situated at the gateway to the resort’s main tourist hubs. The architects reinterpreted the widely popular chalet style while adding an unexpected twist – an unfinished structure preserved on the site. The design team transformed this remnant into an exciting space featuring an open-air pool and a restaurant with panoramic views of the region’s highest mountain ridges.
Sergey Skuratov: “By and large, the project has been realized in line with the original ideas”
In this issue, we talk to the chief architect of Garden Quarters, looking back at the history and key moments of a project that took 18 years to develop and has now finally been completed. What interests us most are the transformations that the project underwent during construction, and the way the “necessary void” of public space was formed, which turned this remarkable complex into a fragment of a whole new type of urban fabric – not just at the horizontal “street” level but in its vertical structure as well.
A Unique Representative
The recently concluded year 2024 can be considered the year of completion for the “Garden Quarters” residential complex in Moscow’s Khamovniki. This project is well-known and, in many ways, iconic. Rarely does one manage to preserve such a number of original ideas, achieving in the end a kind of urban planning Gesamtkunstwerk. Here is a subjective view from an architecture journalist, with an interview with Sergey Skuratov soon to follow.
Field of Life
The new project by the architectural company PNKB (an acronym for “Design, Research, and Advisory Bureau”), led by Sergey Gnedovsky and Anton Lyubimkin, for the Kulikovo Field Museum is dedicated to the field as a concept in its own right. The field has long been a focus of the museum’s thorough and successful research. Accordingly, the exterior of the new museum building is gentler than that of its predecessor, which was also designed by PNKB and dedicated specifically to the historic battle. Inside, however, the building confidently guides the visitor from a luminous atrium along a spiral path to the field – interpreted here as a field of life.
A Paper Clip above the River
In this article, we talk with Vitaly Lutz from the Genplan Institute of Moscow about the design and unique features of the pedestrian bridge that now links the two banks of the Yauza River in the new cluster of Bauman Moscow State Technical University (MSTU). The bridge’s form and functionality – particularly the inclusion of an amphitheater suspended over the river – were conceived during the planning phase of the territory’s development. Typically, this approach is not standard practice, but the architects advocate for it, referring to this intermediate project phase as the “pre-AGR” stage (AGR stands for Architectural and Urban Planning Approval). Such a practice, they argue, helps define key parameters of future projects and bridge the gap between urban planning and architectural design.
Living in the Architecture of One’s Own Making
Do architects design houses for themselves? You bet! In this article, we are examining a new book by TATLIN publishing house. This book – unprecedented for Russia – features 52 private homes designed and built by contemporary architects for themselves. It includes houses that are famous, even iconic, as well as lesser-known ones; large and small, stylish and eccentric. To some extent, the book reflects the history of Russian architecture over the past 30 years.
A City Block Isoline
Another competition project for a residential complex on the banks of the Volga in Nizhny Novgorod has been prepared by Studio 44. A team of architects led by Ivan Kozhin concluded that using a regular block layout in such a location would be inappropriate and developed a “custom design” approach: a chain of parceled multi-section buildings stretching along the entire embankment. Let’s explore the features and advantages of this unconventional method.
Competition: The Price of Creativity?
Any day now, we’re expecting the results of a competition held by the “Samolet” development group for a plot in Kommunarka. In the meantime, we share the impressions of Editor-in-Chief Julia Tarabarina, who managed to conduct a public talk. Though technically focused on the interaction between developers and architects, the public talk turned into a discussion about the pros and cons of architectural competitions.
Terraced Design
The “River Park” residential complex has confidently and securely shaped the Nagatinsky Backwater shoreline. Featuring a public embankment, elevated courtyards connected by pedestrian bridges, and brick façades, the development invites exploration of its nuanced response to the surrounding context, as well as hints of the architects’ megalithic design thinking.
A Kremlin’s Core and Meteorite Fragments
We continue our coverage of the competition projects for the residential district that the development company GloraX plans to build along the embankment of the Rowing Channel in Nizhny Novgorod. ASADOV Architects approached the concept through a deep dive into local identity, using storytelling to pinpoint a central idea for the design: the master plan and composition are imagined as if a meteorite had struck a “proto-Kremlin”. Sounds weird? Find more details below!
The Volga Regatta
GloraX plans to develop a residential complex spanning 14 hectares along the Volga River in Nizhny Novgorod. The winning design in a closed-door competition, created by GORA Architects, features housing typologies ranging from townhouses to terraced high-rise slabs, a balance of functions, diverse ways of engaging with the water, and even a dedicated island (no less!) for the city residents.
Life Plans
The master plan for the residential district “Prityazheniye” (“Gravity”) in Naberezhnye Chelny was developed by the architectural company A.Len, taking into account the specific urban planning context and partially implemented solutions of the first phase. However, the master plan prioritized its own values: a green framework, a system of focal points, a hierarchy of spaces, and pedestrian priority. After this, the question of what residents will do in their neighborhood simply doesn’t arise.
A New Track
We took a thorough look at D_Station, a railcar repair depot dating back to 1906, recently reconstructed while preserving its century-old industrial structure, upon the project by Sergey Trukhanov and T+T Architects. Though work on the interiors – set to house restaurants and public spaces – is still underway, the building’s exterior already offers plenty to see. Visitors can explore the blend of old and new brickwork, appreciate the architect’s unique interpretation of ruin aesthetics, and enjoy the newly built pedestrian route that connects the Citydel Business Center’s arches to Kazakova Street.
Four Different Surveys
The “Explore the City” competition, organized this year by the Genplan Institute of Moscow, stands out as a pretty unconventional one for the architectural field but aligns perfectly well with the character of urban planning work. The winning project analyzed contemporary residential complexes, combining urban planning insights with a realtor’s perspective to propose a hybrid approach. Other entries explored public centers, motivations for car ownership, and housing vacancy rates. A fifth participant withdrew. Here’s a closer look at the four completed works.
Scheduled Evolution
ASADOV Architects unveiled the EvyCenter pavilion, a microcultural hub for fostering personal growth, organizing workshops, and doing gymnastics. Additionally, this pavilion serves as a prototype for a scalable country house, drawing inspiration from the “Loskutok” project, and constructed from CLT panels in a factory. This marks the beginning of a developer project initiated by the architectural firm (sic!), which is seeking partners to expand both small Evy settlements and even larger Evy cities, which are, according to Andrey Asadov, aimed at fostering the “evolutionary” development of the people who will inhabit them.
The Golden Crown
The concept for a dental clinic in Yekaterinburg, developed by CNTR Studio, revolves around the idea of a “mouth full of gold”: pristine white porcelain stoneware walls are complemented by matte brass details. To avoid an overly literal interpretation, the architects focused on the building’s proportions, skillfully navigating between sunlight requirements and fire safety regulations.
Flexibility and Integration
Not long ago, we covered the project for the fourth phase of the ÁLIA residential complex, designed by APEX. Now, we’ve been shown different fence concepts they developed to enclose the complex’s private courtyards, incorporating a variety of public functions. We believe that the sheer fact that the complex’s architects were involved in such a detail as fencing speaks volumes.
A Step Forward
The HIDE residential complex represents a major milestone for ADM architects and their leaders Andrey Romanov and Ekaterina Kuznetsova in their quest for a fresh high-rise aesthetic – one that is flexible and layered, capable of bringing vibrancy to mass and silhouette while shaping form. Over recent years, this approach has become ADM’s “signature style”, with the golden HIDE tower playing a pivotal role in its evolution. Here, we delve into the project’s story, explore the details of the complex’s design, and uncover its core essence.