По-русски

​The Ecological Bend

A story about how plans for laying a road on the border of a park turned into plans for saving the ecosystem and improving the walking trails.

10 August 2021
Object
mainImg
The valley of the Setun River in the west of Moscow is a place that has long since been well-known as an attractive place to live in – there are many new housing projects built on its banks, which should come as no surprise because being situated on the edge of a natural reserve, and by the river as well, is something that is definitely an advantage for a housing complex. One of such “lucky” housing complexes is Kutuzovsky Life, designed by ADM architects, received the territory in the bend of the river at the intersection of Gzhatskaya and Bagritskogo streets, which leads from Mozhaisk Highway to Aminevsky Highway.

Under construction metro station Davydkovo. The site plan of the Gzhatskaya Street. Project visualization
Copyright: © Genplan Institute of Moscow


Unlike the Bagritsky Street, the Gzhatskaya, which crosses it at a right angle, does not let you bypass anything because it stops in a dead end before the Zhukov Ravine in its eastern part. This is where one of the fragments starts of the special protection natural reserve “Setun Valley”. The city here feels more like a dacha settlement; five-story brick houses are interspersed with wooden Modernist houses, late-Soviet high-end residential towers, and even high-profile projects from architectural magazines (the ravine, for example, is overlooked by the east facade of the Catamaran House standing in the Zagorsky Drive).

The land improvement challenges. The site plan of Gzhatskaya Street
Copyright: © Genplan Institute of Moscow


The height difference is about 30 meters from north to south – from the city area to the river bank – and essentially the whole territory (the ravine less so, the riverbank more) is a thick forest on a slope with an odd inclusion of a meadow, bogged creeks, a few wellsprings, lush riverside vegetation, windbreak and traces of the Setun floods. At the entrance we see a poster that speaks of dozens of species rare for Moscow, including weasel and ermine. And if you wander inside, especially in the western part, these statements are easy to believe.

  • zooming
    1 / 7
    Valley of the Setun River in the area of Gzhatskaya street. The springwell
    Copyright: Photograph: Archi.ru
  • zooming
    2 / 7
    Valley of the Setun River in the area of Gzhatskaya street. Indian balsam (Impatiens glandulifera)
    Copyright: Photograph: Archi.ru
  • zooming
    3 / 7
    Valley of the Setun River in the area of Gzhatskaya street. Creeping speedwell (Veronica repens)
    Copyright: Photograph: Archi.ru
  • zooming
    4 / 7
    Valley of the Setun River in the area of Gzhatskaya street. Nettle-leaved bellflower (Campanula trachelium)
    Copyright: Photograph: Archi.ru
  • zooming
    5 / 7
    Valley of the Setun river in the area of Gzhatskaya street. Bungee oak
    Copyright: Photograph: Archi.ru
  • zooming
    6 / 7
    Setun river in the area of Gzhatskaya street
    Copyright: Photograph: Archi.ru
  • zooming
    7 / 7
    Valley of the Setun River in the area of Gzhatskaya street. Wood crane (Geranium sylvaticum)
    Copyright: Photograph: Archi.ru


The brook issuing from the Zhukov Ravine leads to a nearly-circular pond named Pyatachok; in the eastern part of the river a dead-end channel branches off – if the river flows cheerfully and vigorously, then the stagnant water is full of duckweed and requires cleaning.

  • zooming
    Valley of the Setun River in the area of Gzhatskaya street. The “Piglet” pond
    Copyright: Photograph: Archi.ru
  • zooming
    Boggy oxbow of the river in the eastern part of the territory. Valley of the Setuni River in the area of Gzhatskaya Street
    Copyright: Photograph: Archi.ru


Some time ago, the eastern part of the green territory was improved. What came first were probably the concrete staircases with metallic railings on the slopes, and metallic little bridges over the Setun; later on came boardwalks and wooden staircases in the western part, closer to the Aminievskoe Highway, then a few playgrounds were built. All of this, probably for the sole exception of one playground in the Zhukov Ravine, is now in a dilapidated shape: the boards are rotting and sometimes snap underneath your feet, the staircases are unsafe to walk upon, and even the metallic bridge has suffered from the river floods. According to experts, today the local residents walk in this place on the Setun bank at their own risk, and, indeed, when I took a walk in the part, people called out to me “Don’t go their unless you want to break your legs” more than once. In addition, for some reason, the improvement work stopped right in the middle of the park – the boardwalks stop short quite abruptly. But then again, there are also traces of enthusiastic activities of the locals: bungees, fireplaces, and even semblances of art objects.

  • zooming
    1 / 8
    Entrance from Zhukov ravine. Valley of the Setun river in the area of Gzhatskaya street. The curret state
    Copyright: Photograph: Archi.ru
  • zooming
    2 / 8
    The washed fortifications of the banks of the stream in the Zhukovy ravine. Valley of the Setun river in the area of Gzhatskaya street. The current state
    Copyright: Photograph: Archi.ru
  • zooming
    3 / 8
    The washed fortifications of the banks of the stream in the Zhukovy ravine. Valley of the Setun river in the area of Gzhatskaya street. The current state
    Copyright: Photograph: Archi.ru
  • zooming
    4 / 8
    The boardwalks and stairs in the eastern part have rotted at some places. Valley of the Setun River in the area of Gzhatskaya street. The current state
    Copyright: Photograph: Archi.ru
  • zooming
    5 / 8
    One of the stairways. Valley of the Setun River in the area of Gzhatskaya street. The current state
    Copyright: Photograph: Archi.ru
  • zooming
    6 / 8
    Bridge over the Setun. It has no continuation in the form of paths on the other side. Valley of the Setun River in the area of Gzhatskaya street. The current state
    Copyright: Photograph: Archi.ru
  • zooming
    7 / 8
    Elements of the existing improvement. Valley of the Setun river in the area of Gzhatskaya street. The current state
    Copyright: Photograph: Archi.ru
  • zooming
    8 / 8
    “Folk art” can pretend to be seen as an art object. Valley of the Setun river in the area of Gzhatskaya street. The current state
    Copyright: Photograph: Archi.ru


Anyway, the Gzhatskaya Street stops against the ravine in its eastern part, turning into a pedestrian trail. Meanwhile, 600 meters to the east, on the Aminievskoe Highway, the Davydkovo station of the Big Circle Line of the Moscow Metro is under construction. Thus, it made perfect sense that there were plans to extend Gzhatskaya to the highway, turning it from a dead end into an artery. The second task was the concept of arranging the green zone of the park around the residential complex Life Kutuzovsky and to the east, to the metro station. 

Both projects were commissioned to the Institute of the Master Plan of Moscow, and they started from a research which quickly demonstrated that laying a motorway along the northern border of the Setun Valley was not the best idea – something, with which the local residents eagerly agreed. The client also agreed with the objections and gave up the original plans for road construction. This decision was also supported by Moskomarkhitektura. Finally, the ecological reasoning prevailed – curiously, in an expensive part of the city, actively developing, and interested in motoring accessibility. The risk of extinction of rare species of animals and plants or the narrowing of their distribution area turned out to be more significant than the new automobile street. Yes, in Moscow.

Fragment of the layout in the place where the automobile part of the street ends and the cycle route begins in the direction of the metro. The site plan of Gzhatskaya Street
Copyright: © Genplan Institute of Moscow


The authors of the project did quite a bit of preliminary research with input from appropriate experts. The research, on the one hand, showed the presence of rare species of animals and plants, and on the other hand, the need to rehabilitate the natural systems. In the site plan, which was ultimately developed, and which, as is known, is a sum of restrictions and allowances, as well as a basis for future detailed design, includes park furniture, paving the paths with square paving stones, an embankment with boardwalks running along the river bank, reconstructing two pedestrian bridges over the Setun, and building an underpass beneath the bridge of the Bagritsky Street. The project also includes a bicycle/pedestrian running from the metro station to the Aminievskoe Highway: a 10 minutes’ walking distance or 5 minutes on a bike or a scooter. The project does not include an excessive amount of recreation zones, but it does provide a comfortable access to the park for the residents of the nearby old and new buildings alike, leaving the “quiet” and “natural” character of this area unchanged.

Proposals. The site plan of Gzhatskaya Street
Copyright: © Genplan Institute of Moscow


In addition to the park, the site plan includes a rather large surrounding territory, up to the Kutuzov Grad residential complex, and provides for the reconstruction of a few streets – specifically, the Petra Alekseeva Street, which exits to the Mozhaisk Highway, overhauls the engineering networks, Setun purification facilities, and making changes to the public transportation schedule. In other words, improving the park around the Setun is just a part of the mentioned narratives.

  • zooming
    1 / 7
    The site plan of Gzhatskaya Street. Project visualization
    Copyright: © Genplan Institute of Moscow
  • zooming
    2 / 7
    The site plan at the Gzhatskaya Street. THe project visualization
    Copyright: © Genplan Institute of Moscow
  • zooming
    3 / 7
    The place where the automobile section of Gzhatskaya Street ends in front of the Zhukov ravine. The site plan of Gzhatskaya Street. Project visualization
    Copyright: © Genplan Institute of Moscow
  • zooming
    4 / 7
    The crossing of Bagritskiy and Gzhatskaya streets, residential complex Kutuzovskiy Life. The site plan of Gzhatskaya Street. Project visualization
    Copyright: © Genplan Institute of Moscow
  • zooming
    5 / 7
    The site plan of Gzhatskaya Street near the residential complex Kutuzov Grad II. Project visualization
    Copyright: © Genplan Institute of Moscow
  • zooming
    6 / 7
    The site plan of Gzhatskaya Street near the residential complex Kutuzov Grad II. Project visualization
    Copyright: © Genplan Institute of Moscow
  • zooming
    7 / 7
    The site plan of Gzhatskaya Street near the residential complex Kutuzov Grad II. Project visualization
    Copyright: © Genplan Institute of Moscow


It is not surprising that the specialists of the General Planning Institute consider the project unique in its own way. The “180 degree turn” in itself, from the road to the park with an ecological inclination and environmental rehabilitation, deserves attention, as well as the fact that the decision ultimately satisfied all participants in the discussion and design process. The materials are also planned to be used in the further development of the entire Setun reserve as a whole.

Yuliana Knyazhevskaya, Chairman of the Moscow Committee for Architecture and Urban Planning

This project is yet another example of successful interaction between the investor and the city. The agreement was achieved thanks to an integrated multidisciplinary approach, and the main advantage of our developments is that they allow linking all solutions on the development of infrastructure – transport, protected areas, new housing areas, and areas of existing development, and contribute to the creation of a unified comfortable urban environment, taking into account the interests of all stakeholders.


The project went through public hearings (see its page on the Active Citizen website).
Presentation of the project on the Active Citizen website: 



***

We asked a few questions to Anna Ivanova, the head of the Urban Objects Designing Department at the Master Plan Institute: 

zooming


The solution that you came up with in this project for the Gzhatskaya Street is far from trivial indeed. You reversed the whole narrative 180 degrees… How did you pull a stunt like that?

On the one hand, a key part was played by the common sense of all the stakeholders of the process – we would like to emphasize that there were several sides involved in this project: us, the residents, the Department of Natural Resources, and, most importantly, the development company that initiated this project. Our joint work allowed us to find an unconventional, but, we believe, right solution. 

On the other hand, an important part was played by the specific approach utilized by our studio – with any of our projects, we start off with a research, collecting all the available information, and thinking bigger that is implied by the formal borders of the construction site. In this sense, our specialization is significantly broader than just land improvement.

How would you describe the specialization of your studio as part of the Master Plan Institute? 

Our work consists of two major branches. The first one is integrated land improvement, or, to be more specific, a planning approach to defining zones and/or individual land sites that can be later on potentially improved during the implementation of various city programs. One of examples of this is our collaborative project with the Transport Engineering Center of the Master Plan Institute on Moscow Central Diameter 1, 2, and now 3. While our colleagues solve complex problems having to do with the organization of the road network adjoining the metro stations, we, on the other hand, consider not just the land on the immediate vicinity of the metro stations but also within a 1.5 km radius – in order to provide in our solutions the organization of connected, safe walking and cycling routes from all the buildings adjacent to the stations. We go to the site, analyze the current situation, but not only that – we also study all the projects that are being done for this territory, plans of all involved departments and other organizations, in order to get a complete picture not only in the present, but also in the planned future.

Having received all the data, we study the strengths and weaknesses of the territory and form the sum of proposals: what could be changed to make this site more comfortable at a new stage of its development.

I will emphasize: it is important that we always take our research a little bit further than just the land within the limits of the site plan. We design our projects based on their connection with the surrounding city space, and we study how they could best interact with their environment.

In some cases, we also interact with third-party architectural companies – and such collaborations turn out to be very fruitful, one of the recent examples of which is the concept of Marc Chagall embankment in ZIL complex – we did it together with ASADOV architects.

How do you go about implementing these things? How can you make your ideas a reality outside of your site plan?

We form appropriate proposals and share them with our colleagues from other organizations – oftentimes such interaction sets off subsequent work and brings results.

But, of course, the site plan still serves as a basis, and we make quite a lot of projects – take the Moscow Central Diameter, for example – this is a huge chunk of work that consists of numerous parts and involves various stakeholders.

  • zooming
    1 / 5
    The project of developing the terrories around the Moscow Central Diameter
    Genplan Institute of Moscow
  • zooming
    2 / 5
    The project of developing the terrories around the Moscow Central Diameter
    Copyright: © Genplan Institute of Moscow
  • zooming
    3 / 5
    The project of developing the terrories around the Moscow Central Diameter
    Copyright: © Genplan Institute of Moscow
  • zooming
    4 / 5
    The project of developing the terrories around the Moscow Central Diameter
    Copyright: © Genplan Institute of Moscow
  • zooming
    5 / 5
    The project of developing the terrories around the Moscow Central Diameter
    Copyright: © Genplan Institute of Moscow


You said that your company has two specializations. What is the second one?

The second one is visualizations of not just the projects that we are working on, but other projects done by the Institute. And, of course, it’s not just about beautiful pictures but about reflecting and representing the very essence of project proposals. Today, as we know, the land planning projects are submitted for online public hearings. In order to make sure that the solutions proposed in these projects are as clear and as visual as possible, we make not only presentations but also videos of those materials. This allows us to create a very accurate picture of the future urban territories.

But I think our most important achievement is that we were able to put together our creative team that keeps on growing; we have excellent specialists and experts in their fields – architects, urban planners, landscape designers, geographers and biologists, and a dendrologist, all people with an all-rounded creative vision.

10 August 2021

Headlines now
A Unique Representative
The recently concluded year 2024 can be considered the year of completion for the “Garden Quarters” residential complex in Moscow’s Khamovniki. This project is well-known and, in many ways, iconic. Rarely does one manage to preserve such a number of original ideas, achieving in the end a kind of urban planning Gesamtkunstwerk. Here is a subjective view from an architecture journalist, with an interview with Sergey Skuratov soon to follow.
Field of Life
The new project by the architectural company PNKB (an acronym for “Design, Research, and Advisory Bureau”), led by Sergey Gnedovsky and Anton Lyubimkin, for the Kulikovo Field Museum is dedicated to the field as a concept in its own right. The field has long been a focus of the museum’s thorough and successful research. Accordingly, the exterior of the new museum building is gentler than that of its predecessor, which was also designed by PNKB and dedicated specifically to the historic battle. Inside, however, the building confidently guides the visitor from a luminous atrium along a spiral path to the field – interpreted here as a field of life.
A Paper Clip above the River
In this article, we talk with Vitaly Lutz from the Genplan Institute of Moscow about the design and unique features of the pedestrian bridge that now links the two banks of the Yauza River in the new cluster of Bauman Moscow State Technical University (MSTU). The bridge’s form and functionality – particularly the inclusion of an amphitheater suspended over the river – were conceived during the planning phase of the territory’s development. Typically, this approach is not standard practice, but the architects advocate for it, referring to this intermediate project phase as the “pre-AGR” stage (AGR stands for Architectural and Urban Planning Approval). Such a practice, they argue, helps define key parameters of future projects and bridge the gap between urban planning and architectural design.
Living in the Architecture of One’s Own Making
Do architects design houses for themselves? You bet! In this article, we are examining a new book by TATLIN publishing house. This book – unprecedented for Russia – features 52 private homes designed and built by contemporary architects for themselves. It includes houses that are famous, even iconic, as well as lesser-known ones; large and small, stylish and eccentric. To some extent, the book reflects the history of Russian architecture over the past 30 years.
A City Block Isoline
Another competition project for a residential complex on the banks of the Volga in Nizhny Novgorod has been prepared by Studio 44. A team of architects led by Ivan Kozhin concluded that using a regular block layout in such a location would be inappropriate and developed a “custom design” approach: a chain of parceled multi-section buildings stretching along the entire embankment. Let’s explore the features and advantages of this unconventional method.
Competition: The Price of Creativity?
Any day now, we’re expecting the results of a competition held by the “Samolet” development group for a plot in Kommunarka. In the meantime, we share the impressions of Editor-in-Chief Julia Tarabarina, who managed to conduct a public talk. Though technically focused on the interaction between developers and architects, the public talk turned into a discussion about the pros and cons of architectural competitions.
Terraced Design
The “River Park” residential complex has confidently and securely shaped the Nagatinsky Backwater shoreline. Featuring a public embankment, elevated courtyards connected by pedestrian bridges, and brick façades, the development invites exploration of its nuanced response to the surrounding context, as well as hints of the architects’ megalithic design thinking.
A Kremlin’s Core and Meteorite Fragments
We continue our coverage of the competition projects for the residential district that the development company GloraX plans to build along the embankment of the Rowing Channel in Nizhny Novgorod. ASADOV Architects approached the concept through a deep dive into local identity, using storytelling to pinpoint a central idea for the design: the master plan and composition are imagined as if a meteorite had struck a “proto-Kremlin”. Sounds weird? Find more details below!
The Volga Regatta
GloraX plans to develop a residential complex spanning 14 hectares along the Volga River in Nizhny Novgorod. The winning design in a closed-door competition, created by GORA Architects, features housing typologies ranging from townhouses to terraced high-rise slabs, a balance of functions, diverse ways of engaging with the water, and even a dedicated island (no less!) for the city residents.
Life Plans
The master plan for the residential district “Prityazheniye” (“Gravity”) in Naberezhnye Chelny was developed by the architectural company A.Len, taking into account the specific urban planning context and partially implemented solutions of the first phase. However, the master plan prioritized its own values: a green framework, a system of focal points, a hierarchy of spaces, and pedestrian priority. After this, the question of what residents will do in their neighborhood simply doesn’t arise.
A New Track
We took a thorough look at D_Station, a railcar repair depot dating back to 1906, recently reconstructed while preserving its century-old industrial structure, upon the project by Sergey Trukhanov and T+T Architects. Though work on the interiors – set to house restaurants and public spaces – is still underway, the building’s exterior already offers plenty to see. Visitors can explore the blend of old and new brickwork, appreciate the architect’s unique interpretation of ruin aesthetics, and enjoy the newly built pedestrian route that connects the Citydel Business Center’s arches to Kazakova Street.
Four Different Surveys
The “Explore the City” competition, organized this year by the Genplan Institute of Moscow, stands out as a pretty unconventional one for the architectural field but aligns perfectly well with the character of urban planning work. The winning project analyzed contemporary residential complexes, combining urban planning insights with a realtor’s perspective to propose a hybrid approach. Other entries explored public centers, motivations for car ownership, and housing vacancy rates. A fifth participant withdrew. Here’s a closer look at the four completed works.
Scheduled Evolution
ASADOV Architects unveiled the EvyCenter pavilion, a microcultural hub for fostering personal growth, organizing workshops, and doing gymnastics. Additionally, this pavilion serves as a prototype for a scalable country house, drawing inspiration from the “Loskutok” project, and constructed from CLT panels in a factory. This marks the beginning of a developer project initiated by the architectural firm (sic!), which is seeking partners to expand both small Evy settlements and even larger Evy cities, which are, according to Andrey Asadov, aimed at fostering the “evolutionary” development of the people who will inhabit them.
The Golden Crown
The concept for a dental clinic in Yekaterinburg, developed by CNTR Studio, revolves around the idea of a “mouth full of gold”: pristine white porcelain stoneware walls are complemented by matte brass details. To avoid an overly literal interpretation, the architects focused on the building’s proportions, skillfully navigating between sunlight requirements and fire safety regulations.
Flexibility and Integration
Not long ago, we covered the project for the fourth phase of the ÁLIA residential complex, designed by APEX. Now, we’ve been shown different fence concepts they developed to enclose the complex’s private courtyards, incorporating a variety of public functions. We believe that the sheer fact that the complex’s architects were involved in such a detail as fencing speaks volumes.
A Step Forward
The HIDE residential complex represents a major milestone for ADM architects and their leaders Andrey Romanov and Ekaterina Kuznetsova in their quest for a fresh high-rise aesthetic – one that is flexible and layered, capable of bringing vibrancy to mass and silhouette while shaping form. Over recent years, this approach has become ADM’s “signature style”, with the golden HIDE tower playing a pivotal role in its evolution. Here, we delve into the project’s story, explore the details of the complex’s design, and uncover its core essence.
Gold in the Sands
A new office for a transcontinental company specializing in resource extraction and processing has opened in Dubai. Designed by T+T Architects, masters of creating spaces that are contemporary, diverse, flexible, and original, this project exemplifies their expertise. On the executive floor, a massive brass-clad partition dominates, while layered textures of compressed earth create a contextually resonant backdrop.
Layers and Levels of Flight
This project goes way back – Reserve Union won this architectural competition at the end of 2011, and the building was completed in 2018, so it’s practically “archival”. However, despite being relatively unknown, the building can hardly be considered “dated” and remains a prime example of architectural expression, particularly in the headquarters genre. And it’s especially fitting for an aviation company office. In some ways, it resembles the Aeroflot headquarters at Sheremetyevo but with its own unique identity, following the signature style of Vladimir Plotkin. In this article, we take an in-depth look at the United Aircraft Corporation (UAC) headquarters in the Moscow agglomeration town of Zhukovsky, supplemented by recent photographs from Alexey Naroditsky – a shoot that became only recently possible due to the fact that improvements were finally made in the surrounding area.
Light and Shadow
In this article, we delve into the architectural design of the “Chaika” house by DNK ag architects, which was recently completed in 2023 as part of the collection of signature designs at ZILArt. As is well-known, all the buildings in this complex follow a design code, yet each one is distinct. This particular building stands out not only for its whiteness and minimalism but also for the refined use of a limited number of techniques that, together, create what can confidently be called synergy.
Casus Novae
A master plan was developed for a large residential area with a name of “DNS City”, but now that its implementation began, the plan has been arbitrarily reformatted and replaced with something that, while similar on the surface, is actually quite different. This is not the first time such a thing happens, but it’s always frustrating. With permission from the author, we are sharing Maria Elkina’s post.
Treasure Hunting
The GAFA bureau, in collaboration with Tegola and Arkhitail, organized an expedition to the island of Kilpola in Karelia as part of Moskomarkhitektura’s “Open City” festival. There, amidst moss and rocks, the students sought answers to questions like: what is the sacred, where does it dwell, and what sustains it? Assisting the participants in this quest were landscape engineer Evgeny Levin, artist Nicholas Roerich, a moose, and the lack of cellular connection. Here’s how the story unfolded.
Depths of the Earth, Streams of Water
In the Malaya Okhta district, the Akzent building, designed by Stepan Liphart, was constructed. It follows a classic tripartite structure, yet it’s what you might call “hand-drawn”: each façade is unique in its form and details, some of which aren’t immediately noticeable. In this article, we explore the context and, together with the architect, delve into how the form was developed.
Fir Tree Dynamics
The “Airports of Region” holding is planning to build an airport in Karachay-Cherkessia, aiming to make the Arkhyz and Dombay resorts more accessible to travelers. The project that won in an invitation-only competition, submitted by Sergey Nikeshkin’s KPLN, blends natural imagery inspired by the shape of a conifer seed, open-air waiting spaces, majestic large trees, and a green roof elevated on needle-like columns. The result is both nature-inspired and WOW.
​A Brick Shell
In the process of designing a clubhouse situated among pine trees in a prestigious suburban area near Moscow, the architectural firm “A.Len” did the façade design part. The combination of different types of brick and masonry correlates with the volumetric and plastique solutions, further enhanced by the inclusion of wood-painted fragments and metal “glazing”.
Word Forms
ATRIUM architects love ambitious challenges, and for the firm’s thirtieth anniversary, they boldly play a game of words with an exhibition that dives deep into a self-created vocabulary. They immerse their projects – especially art installations – into this glossary, as if plunging into a current of their own. You feel as if you’re flowing through the veins of pure art, immersed in a universe of vertical cities, educational spaces – of which the architects are true masters – and the cultural codes of various locations. But what truly captivates is the bold statement that Vera Butko and Anton Nadtochy make, both through their work and this exhibition: architecture, above all, is art – the art of working with form and space.
Flexibility and Acuteness of Modernity
Luxurious, fluid, large “kokoshniks” and spiral barrel columns, as if made from colorful chewing gum: there seem to be no other mansion like this in Moscow, designed in the “Neo-Russian-Modern” style. And the “Teremok” on Malaya Kaluzhskaya, previously somewhat obscure, has “come alive with new colors” and gained visibility after its restoration for the office of the “architectural ecosystem” as the architects love to call themselves. It’s evident that Julius Borisov and the architects at UNK put their hearts into finding this new office and bringing it up to date. Let’s delve into the paradoxes of this mansion’s history and its plasticity. Spoiler: two versions of modernity meet here, both balancing on the razor’s edge of “what’s current”.
Yuri Vissarionov: “A modular house does not belong to the land”
It belongs to space, or to the air... It turns out that 3D printing is more effective when combined with a modular approach: the house is built in a workshop and then adapted to the site, including on uneven terrain. Yuri Vissarionov shares his latest experience in designing tourist complexes, both in central Russia and in the south. These include houseboats, homes printed from lightweight concrete using a 3D printer, and, of course, frame houses.
​Moscow’s First
“The quality of education largely depends on the quality of the educational environment”. This principle of the last decade has been realized by Sergey Skuratov in the project for the First Moscow Gymnasium on Rostovskaya Embankment in the Khamovniki district. The building seamlessly integrates into the complex urban landscape, responding both to the pedestrian flow of the city and the quiet alleyways. It skillfully takes advantage of the height differences and aligns with modern trends in educational space design. Let’s take a closer look.
Looking at the Water
The site of Villa Sonata stretches from the road to the water’s edge, offering its own shoreline, pier, and a picturesque river panorama. To reveal these sweeping views, Roman Leonidov “cut” the façade diagonally parallel to the river, thus getting two main axes for the house and, consequently, “two heads”. The internal core – two double-height spaces, a living room and a conservatory, with a “bridge” above them – makes the house both “transparent” and filled with light.
The White Wing
Well, it’s not exactly white. It’s more of a beige, white-stone structure that plays with the color of limestone – smoother surfaces are lighter, while rougher ones are darker. This wing unites various elements: it absorbs and interprets the surrounding themes. It responds to everything, yet maintains a cohesive expression – a challenging task! – while also incorporating recognizable features of its own, such as the dynamic cuts at the bottom, top, and middle.