Athletic Load

The Vasilisy Kozhinoi Street stretches along a railroad line northward from the Pobedy Park, not far away from the Kutuzovsky Avenue. North of the avenue, there is a strip of an apple garden that has survived into the present day, then there is a Byelorussian-bound railroad line, and still further away, behind the Kozhinoi Street, there is an area of brick 5-story houses interspersed with 12-story prefabricated buildings. The strip of land about 100 meters wide which runs between the railroad line and the street was once occupied by private single-story houses; in the seventies it housed a few small-sized industrial parks, a hotel belonging to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, and the open-air stadium “Bagration”. Today, the spot of the stadium became the construction site for the multifunctional complex “Match Point” – built upon the project of ABV group, it inherits the stadium’s sportive function; it will also unite housing stock – over 1600 apartments – a certain number of offices, and an international volleyball arena for 3500 spectators. This arena – the biggest in Europe – will become the base of the “Dinamo” club. The client is “Voley Grand”, part of the management structure of “VTB Project” of VTB Group.

The “tennis” name of Match Point was suggested by the developer. Strictly speaking, it has nothing to do with volleyball, although it does have something to do with sports in general. Match point in tennis is a point which if won by one of the players or sides will also win them the match, so, the name of the complex puts an interesting spin not only on the theme of sports as such but also the location of the complex next to the Pobedy (“Victory”) Park. “One step away from victory” – says the advertising slogan on the housing complex website. The border of the park is mere 300 hundred meters away by a straight line, while the metro station bearing the same name is but a 12 minutes’ walk away.

zooming — Multifunctional complex with apartments and a volleball arena. Visualization along the Vasilisy Kozhinoi Street. View 3 © ABV Group

According to the leader of ABV Group, Nikita Biryukov, this project turned out to be a stumbling block to many architects because it required solving several impossible things at once: to combine a grand-scale sports facility, rather strong housing density, and rigorous height restrictions. After the budget was all but exhausted by several failed attempts, the customer resorted to a closed-doors competition – which was ultimately won by Nikita Biryukov and ABV Group. “The Dinamo Company was looking to build a stadium for international games here – shares Nikita Biryukov – and, in order to do that, they had to build a housing complex to make the money. Meaning – it had to be such kind of a housing complex that would make enough money to finance the sports part”. Because of that, the arena became an extra workload and an extra challenge. Plus, because of the proximity of the railroad, the architects had to reinforce the foundation.

The entire complex, including the residential buildings and the volleyball arena, rests on a three-level underground parking garage designed to accommodate for 1609 cars. The laconic oval “hockey puck” of the arena, decorated – very much in the spirit of the 1970’s – with an austere row of light-beige ribs of vertical lamellae, is situated in the west part of the complex – when backlit at night, it looks as if it were literally hovering in the air.

Again, in the spirit of the 1970’s, the arena is surrounded by an open-air gallery accessed by symmetrical ascending staircases from the “grand entrance” side on the Kozhinoi Street – they are slightly reminiscent of a similar walkway in the “Olimpiysky” sports complex.

From the opposite side, a rectangular volume of the gym shoots out from the main volume in the direction of the railroad line: it is sunken two tiers into the ground, thus only slightly changing the contour of the second floor; higher up, the rounded shape is pure and laconic.

While the volleyball arena, the high-profile element of the ensemble, can be architecturally traced back to the seventies and even the eighties with their search for “reduced order”, the volumes of the residential buildings are dominated by the contextual motif. First of all, they are designed in the form of a strictly symmetric frame, and on the plan they look very much like the postwar Stalin houses of the Kutuzovsky Avenue and its surroundings, the difference being that Match Point is two-three times larger in size. As we remember, one of the difficult tasks was to combine the square footage output with the height restrictions and insolation requirements. Hence, the silhouette of two large “stairs”: in the south part facing the railway station and the Kutuzovsky Avenue, there are two corner buildings, towers 28 stories each, of an almost 100 meter height; in the north part facing the Vasilisy Kozhinoi Street, the buildings are 13 stories high – almost on a level with the neighboring buildings.

In order to make sure that the towers obscure as little sunlight as possible from the south side, an opening appeared in the middle, equal to their width.

Meanwhile, the height difference between the south and the north part is considerable – 5 stories. In order to compensate for it, the architects added a small “stair” of “transition” sections in the panorama of the towers: 18 stories, 63 meters.

The hundred-meter towers – just short of skyscrapers – will be perceived chiefly from a distance and work in the long perspective of the Kutuzovsky Avenue. Hence the color – pale-yellow and beige; a clear-cut division into top, middle, and bottom, combination of light-colored verticals and visually “sunken-in” horizontals – the rhythmic theme of the high-rises and their younger brothers of a smaller height, such as the romantic forts of Zinevich – buildings 21 and 25, located not far away from here, closer to the city center down the Kutuzovsky Avenue.

The theme of Stalin art-deco, however, is not totally dominant here: setting the classic rhythm, the architects immediately break away from it, “stringing” the volumes of the buildings upon the broad bands of the verticals of glass stanzas: they visually dissect the towers into more slender parts turning them into a semblance of tetra-pylons, at the same time putting one in the mind of one of the techniques referring to the postmodernist architecture of Ricardo Bofill because the glass bands visually take a lot of weight off the building.

Similar glass verticals also separate the towers from the low-rise buildings which face the street. Inside their first floor, there is a recessed pedestrian gallery – a relative of the Rivoli Street, shopping arcades of the XVIII century, and the central character of the theories proposed by Moscow town planners of the 1980’s – it forms a comfort zone before the shops and restaurants of the first floor providing protection from the wind and the rain for the guests and customers, as well as for the people going to and from the metro station.

The tripartite composition of the façade also reminds one of some of the nearby “Stalin” buildings – basically, it can be traced back to the formula of the Palladian palace. The only slight difference may lie in the fact that, just as the towers, it is totally devoid of any decor, stripped down to the point of being all linear, its esthetics formed by slender, almost fragile, faceting of the glass of the stanzas and the inserts that visually enhance their depth, made of opaque green glass.

The stanzas are designed in such a way that each of the apartments has one, while the range of apartment layouts, as is the custom nowadays, is moderately diverse, from studios to three-room apartments with a few exclusive variants going beyond the basic layout patterns. Specifically, on the street side the thirteenth floor gets 4-room apartments 350 square meters each – but these “unique pieces” are relatively few here. Generally, the floor area of the apartments is pretty moderate, from 30 to 100 square meters. The floor plans of all the buildings are of the corridor-and-section type: each two sections are linked by a corridor. As for the “dark corners” that are generally characteristic of the city block planning, all the four of them here are occupied by elevator shafts – the layouts are just as rational as the façades.

Thus, the architecture of Match Point is strictly orthogonal – this is pure and elegant modernism, but a few hints at the classic postwar architecture inspired by the context of the Kutuzovsky Avenue helped the architects to avoid using the standard modernist “grid” on the façade, added some sophistication and historical depth, as well as helped the building to “make friends” with its surroundings. Perhaps, aside from the “Stalin Empire Style”, one could also make an appropriate recollection of the symmetric avant-garde at the dawn of its existence – for example, “Gostorg” by Boris Velikovsky.

The elegance of the forms is matched by the materials used. There were some certain budget constraints but the architects put in a lot of effort to make this housing complex look expensive. There was also an option of using a wood-imitating decoration material. However, the architects settled on the Jurassic stone on the first two tiers and painted steel cassettes – sturdier and more beautiful than aluminum one – going higher all the way up. As was already said, the complex is ruled by the light-beige color, a couple of shades lighter than the “Stalin” brick and stone. It is combined with darker gray aluminum in the glazing sashes, grilles of perforated metal, whose pattern was carefully selected, striped baskets for the air-conditioning units and air-exit grilles. All of the façades are made up of thin layers; the beige surfaces are slightly closer, the dark metal and the grilles are slightly deeper inside; the resulting effect of combining cutaway metal, stone and glass, brings us to an austere-looking, maybe even high-tech version of Art Deco, still, nevertheless, resonant with modern experiments of ornamental architecture.

The rigorous symmetry whose laws are obeyed by all of the described subtleties is violated – or, should we say, livened up – but once. Getting inside the yard through the pass-through colonnade in the center of the gallery running along the Vasilisy Kozhinoi Street, we find ourselves standing face to face with a quite modern (yet full of baroque-style plastique) façade of a three-story office building standing amidst the 28-story towers: large windows of horizontal proportions, livened up by triangular ledges of the bay windows, look like giant master switches, thus also fitting the atmosphere of nostalgic modernism, although with a certain, however slight, note of “neo” in their tune. On the other hand, because of its unexpectedly “local” scale, this building looks slightly alien here, and this is where the play of associations comes in: it looks a bit like it has survived from the days past, or, maybe, quite the opposite, appeared after the construction of the main local grid of residential houses.

Thus, it turns out that the ostentatious outward segregation into different functions – arena, housing, and offices – is also combined with segregation of the stylistic and even historical type: the seventies, the “cleared up” version of the Stalin classics, and the agile bay windows of the contemporary modernism. This way, the arena reminds us about the cult of sport in the USSR; the residential house is respectable in the spirit of the once-elite Kutuzovsky Avenue (still pretty expensive today), and the office is today’s architecture. Even the kindergarten comes into play – the reeds on its wall occupy in this order the place of nature that is possibly meant to signify the future in this context. But then again, these same themes can be read from the complex’s typology alone: the Stalin house is a phenotype that is more than sturdy and appropriate, the same applies to the stadium of the seventies, and the office must become the “window”, while the kindergarten is in fact the garden, a realm of natural uncertainty.

Although, apart from the very subtle play with the chronology of meanings, the complex is quite contemporary, and meets a lot of requirements of today – it provides parking places for almost every apartment, has a vehicle-free yard and a landscaped arena, public bottom floors and a gallery for the comfortable work of the stores. This whole thing is being built in the area of Moscow City and the Kutuzovsky Avenue, in an expensive and prestigious district, in which large housing complexes are currently being built everywhere along the Moskva River instead of former industrial parks. The area of Fili and the Pobedy Park must soon change significantly, and grow larger in its scale. The input of the architects consists in giving this process a certain shape, putting it into some kind of visual and volumetric framework, and finding the best possible solution in the conditions of rather strict requirements, including that of taking this densely populated area to a level of becoming the catalyst for creating a new and improved urban environment.

16 November 2017

Written by:
Lara Kopylova, Julia Tarabarina
Translated by:
Anton Mizonov

Written by:
Lara Kopylova, Julia Tarabarina
Translated by:
Anton Mizonov

Headlines now

Object

A Step Forward

The HIDE residential complex represents a major milestone for ADM architects and their leaders Andrey Romanov and Ekaterina Kuznetsova in their quest for a fresh high-rise aesthetic – one that is flexible and layered, capable of bringing vibrancy to mass and silhouette while shaping form. Over recent years, this approach has become ADM’s “signature style”, with the golden HIDE tower playing a pivotal role in its evolution. Here, we delve into the project’s story, explore the details of the complex’s design, and uncover its core essence.

Object

Gold in the Sands

A new office for a transcontinental company specializing in resource extraction and processing has opened in Dubai. Designed by T+T Architects, masters of creating spaces that are contemporary, diverse, flexible, and original, this project exemplifies their expertise. On the executive floor, a massive brass-clad partition dominates, while layered textures of compressed earth create a contextually resonant backdrop.

Object

Layers and Levels of Flight

This project goes way back – Reserve Union won this architectural competition at the end of 2011, and the building was completed in 2018, so it’s practically “archival”. However, despite being relatively unknown, the building can hardly be considered “dated” and remains a prime example of architectural expression, particularly in the headquarters genre. And it’s especially fitting for an aviation company office. In some ways, it resembles the Aeroflot headquarters at Sheremetyevo but with its own unique identity, following the signature style of Vladimir Plotkin. In this article, we take an in-depth look at the United Aircraft Corporation (UAC) headquarters in the Moscow agglomeration town of Zhukovsky, supplemented by recent photographs from Alexey Naroditsky – a shoot that became only recently possible due to the fact that improvements were finally made in the surrounding area.

Object

Light and Shadow

In this article, we delve into the architectural design of the “Chaika” house by DNK ag architects, which was recently completed in 2023 as part of the collection of signature designs at ZILArt. As is well-known, all the buildings in this complex follow a design code, yet each one is distinct. This particular building stands out not only for its whiteness and minimalism but also for the refined use of a limited number of techniques that, together, create what can confidently be called synergy.

View

Casus Novae

A master plan was developed for a large residential area with a name of “DNS City”, but now that its implementation began, the plan has been arbitrarily reformatted and replaced with something that, while similar on the surface, is actually quite different. This is not the first time such a thing happens, but it’s always frustrating. With permission from the author, we are sharing Maria Elkina’s post.

Report

Treasure Hunting

The GAFA bureau, in collaboration with Tegola and Arkhitail, organized an expedition to the island of Kilpola in Karelia as part of Moskomarkhitektura’s “Open City” festival. There, amidst moss and rocks, the students sought answers to questions like: what is the sacred, where does it dwell, and what sustains it? Assisting the participants in this quest were landscape engineer Evgeny Levin, artist Nicholas Roerich, a moose, and the lack of cellular connection. Here’s how the story unfolded.

Object

Depths of the Earth, Streams of Water

In the Malaya Okhta district, the Akzent building, designed by Stepan Liphart, was constructed. It follows a classic tripartite structure, yet it’s what you might call “hand-drawn”: each façade is unique in its form and details, some of which aren’t immediately noticeable. In this article, we explore the context and, together with the architect, delve into how the form was developed.

Object

Fir Tree Dynamics

The “Airports of Region” holding is planning to build an airport in Karachay-Cherkessia, aiming to make the Arkhyz and Dombay resorts more accessible to travelers. The project that won in an invitation-only competition, submitted by Sergey Nikeshkin’s KPLN, blends natural imagery inspired by the shape of a conifer seed, open-air waiting spaces, majestic large trees, and a green roof elevated on needle-like columns. The result is both nature-inspired and WOW.

Object

A Brick Shell

In the process of designing a clubhouse situated among pine trees in a prestigious suburban area near Moscow, the architectural firm “A.Len” did the façade design part. The combination of different types of brick and masonry correlates with the volumetric and plastique solutions, further enhanced by the inclusion of wood-painted fragments and metal “glazing”.

Report

Word Forms

ATRIUM architects love ambitious challenges, and for the firm’s thirtieth anniversary, they boldly play a game of words with an exhibition that dives deep into a self-created vocabulary. They immerse their projects – especially art installations – into this glossary, as if plunging into a current of their own. You feel as if you’re flowing through the veins of pure art, immersed in a universe of vertical cities, educational spaces – of which the architects are true masters – and the cultural codes of various locations. But what truly captivates is the bold statement that Vera Butko and Anton Nadtochy make, both through their work and this exhibition: architecture, above all, is art – the art of working with form and space.

Object

Flexibility and Acuteness of Modernity

Luxurious, fluid, large “kokoshniks” and spiral barrel columns, as if made from colorful chewing gum: there seem to be no other mansion like this in Moscow, designed in the “Neo-Russian-Modern” style. And the “Teremok” on Malaya Kaluzhskaya, previously somewhat obscure, has “come alive with new colors” and gained visibility after its restoration for the office of the “architectural ecosystem” as the architects love to call themselves. It’s evident that Julius Borisov and the architects at UNK put their hearts into finding this new office and bringing it up to date. Let’s delve into the paradoxes of this mansion’s history and its plasticity. Spoiler: two versions of modernity meet here, both balancing on the razor’s edge of “what’s current”.

Interview

Yuri Vissarionov: “A modular house does not belong to the land”

It belongs to space, or to the air... It turns out that 3D printing is more effective when combined with a modular approach: the house is built in a workshop and then adapted to the site, including on uneven terrain. Yuri Vissarionov shares his latest experience in designing tourist complexes, both in central Russia and in the south. These include houseboats, homes printed from lightweight concrete using a 3D printer, and, of course, frame houses.

Object

Moscow’s First

“The quality of education largely depends on the quality of the educational environment”. This principle of the last decade has been realized by Sergey Skuratov in the project for the First Moscow Gymnasium on Rostovskaya Embankment in the Khamovniki district. The building seamlessly integrates into the complex urban landscape, responding both to the pedestrian flow of the city and the quiet alleyways. It skillfully takes advantage of the height differences and aligns with modern trends in educational space design. Let’s take a closer look.

Object

Looking at the Water

The site of Villa Sonata stretches from the road to the water’s edge, offering its own shoreline, pier, and a picturesque river panorama. To reveal these sweeping views, Roman Leonidov “cut” the façade diagonally parallel to the river, thus getting two main axes for the house and, consequently, “two heads”. The internal core – two double-height spaces, a living room and a conservatory, with a “bridge” above them – makes the house both “transparent” and filled with light.

Object

The White Wing

Well, it’s not exactly white. It’s more of a beige, white-stone structure that plays with the color of limestone – smoother surfaces are lighter, while rougher ones are darker. This wing unites various elements: it absorbs and interprets the surrounding themes. It responds to everything, yet maintains a cohesive expression – a challenging task! – while also incorporating recognizable features of its own, such as the dynamic cuts at the bottom, top, and middle.

Object

Urban Dunes

The XSA Ramps team designed and built a three-part sports hub for a park in Rostov-on-Don, welcoming people of all ages and fitness levels. The skate plaza, pump track, and playground are all meticulously crafted with details that attract a diverse range of visitors. The technical execution of the shapes and slopes transforms this space into a kind of sculptural composition.

Object

Proportional Growth

The project for the fourth phase of the ÁLIA residential area has been announced. The buildings are situated on an elongated plot – almost a “ray” that shoots out from the center of the area towards the river. Their layout reflects both a response to Moscow’s architectural preferences over the past 15 years, shifting “from blocks to towers”, and an interpretation of the neighboring business park designed by SOM. Additionally, the best apartments here are not located at the very top but closer to the middle, forming a glowing “waistline”.

Object

The “Staircase” Building

In designing the “Details” residential complex in New Moscow, Rais Baishev spiced up the now-popular Moscow theme of a “courtyard” building with an idea drawn from the surrealist drawings by Maurits Escher. He envisioned the stepped silhouettes and descending slopes as a metaphysical mega-staircase, creating a key void within the courtyard that gave the project an internal “spine”. This concept is felt both in the building’s silhouette and on its façades.

Object

Projection of the Quarter

No one doubted that the building that Vladimir Plotkin designed as part of the “Garden Quarters” would be the most modernist of all. And it turned out just that way: while adhering to the common design code, the building successfully combines brick and white stone, rhythmically responding to the neighboring building designed by Ostozhenka, yet tactfully and persistently making a few statements of its own. This includes the projection of the ideal urban development composition “14–9–6”, which can be found right next door, mathematical calculations, including those for various types of terraces (and perhaps the only reminder of the Soviet past of the Kauchuk rubber factory!), and the white “cross-stitch” pattern of the façade grid.

Object

Domus Aurea

In this issue, we examine the “Tessinsky-1” house, designed by Sergey Skuratov and completed in 2023. Located in the middle of the Serebryanicheskaya Embankment district, at the intersection of its main streets, this house assumes a sort of “nodal” role: it not only responds to everything around it and preserves many memories of the former EMA factory within itself, but it weaves all this into a newly directed pattern, reconciling bright “gold” and dark-colored brick, largely with the help of the new, modern-yet-archaic Columba brick, which, come to think about it, is the most precious element here.

send.project

The Chimney of Nikola-Lenivets

In this issue, we are examining the “Obelisk House” designed by KATARSIS and built for the Arkhstoyanie 2023 festival. However, it was only finished later on, and this is why we are examining it now. It seems to us that after the “Obelisk House” appeared in Nikola-Lenivets, a dialogue and a few inner connections appeared between the temporary structures built here. These houses no longer look like “accidental neighbors”, more of which below.

Periscope by the Bay

The jury awarded the second place in the competition for a public and cultural center in Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky to the companies GORA (“Mountain”) and M4. In the consortium’s proposal, the building resembles a sperm whale with a calf swimming next to it or a periscope, whose lenses capture the most spectacular views from the surrounding landscape.

Contest Results

From Arcs to Dolmens

While working on the competition project for Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky, ASADOV Architects prioritized the value of the natural and urban environment, aiming to preserve the balance of the location while minimizing the resemblance of the volume that they designed to a “traditional building”. The task was challenging, and the architects created three versions, one of which having been developed after the competition, where their main proposal took third place. However, the point of interest here is not the competition result but the continuity of creative thinking.

Object

Hide and Seek

The ID Moskovskiy house, designed by Stepan Liphart in St. Petersburg, in the courtyards near Moskovskiy Avenue beyond the Obvodny Canal and recently completed, is notable for several reasons. Firstly, it has been realized with considerable accuracy, which is particularly significant as this is the first building where the architect was responsible not only for the facades but also for the layouts, allowing for better integration between the two. On the other hand, this building is interesting as an example of the “germination” of new architecture in the city: it draws on the best examples from the neighborhood and becomes an improved and developed sum of ideas found by the architect in the surrounding context.

The Big Twelve

Yesterday, the winners of the Moscow Mayor’s Architecture Award were announced and honored. Let’s take a look at what was awarded and, in some cases, even critique this esteemed award. After all, there is always room for improvement, right?

Object

Above the Golden Horn

The residential complex “Philosophy” designed by T+T architects in Vladivostok, is one of the new projects in the “Golubinaya Pad” area, changing its development philosophy (pun intended) from single houses to a comprehensive approach. The buildings are organized along public streets, varying in height and format, with one house even executed in gallery typology, featuring a cantilever leaning on an art object.

Report

Nuanced Alternative

How can you rhyme a square and space? Easily! But to do so, you need to rhyme everything you can possibly think of: weave everything together, like in a tensegrity structure, and find your own optics too. The new exhibition at GES-2 does just that, offering its visitor a new perspective on the history of art spanning 150 years, infused with the hope for endless multiplicity of worlds and art histories. Read on to see how this is achieved and how the exhibition design by Evgeny Ace contributes to it.

Object

Blinds for Ice

An ice arena has been constructed in Domodedovo based on a project by Yuri Vissarionov Architects. To prevent the long façade, a technical requirement for winter sports facilities, from appearing monotonous, the architects proposed the use of suspended structures with multidirectional slats. This design protects the ice from direct sunlight while giving the wall texture and detail.

Contest Results

Frozen Magma

A competition for the creation of a public and cultural center was held in Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky. Three architectural companies made it to the final, and we consider it important to share about the work of each. Let’s start with the winner – the consortium led by Wowhaus.

Report

Campus within a Day

In this article, we talk about what the participants of Genplan Institute of Moscow’s hackathon were doing at the MosComArchitecture booth at the “ArchMoscow” exhibition. We also discuss who won the prize and why, and what can be done with the territory of a small university on the outskirts of Moscow.

​Athletic Load

Working with the Match Point housing complex, ABV Group, headed by Nikita Biryukov, was able to neatly “pack” a considerable amount of floor space, distributing the height of the complex and its imagery among the main functions: a sports arena, a residential building, and a small office one.

Athletic Load