По-русски

​Sokolniki Park: Nature's Embassy in the Megalopolis

The contest for the best development concept for Sokolniki Park was won by the consortium of the British company Groundlab, Moscow’s Wowhaus, and Saint Petersburg institute of urban planning "Urbanica".

18 September 2014
Contest Results
mainImg
First place. "Nature's Embassy" Project. Authors: Groundlab (Netherlands), Wowhaus (Russia), Institute of urban planning "Urbanica" (Russia).



The international contest started on May 19 and consisted of two stages: the willingness to participate in it was expressed by 79 teams from different parts of the world but only ten consortiums from six countries were selected by the judging panel to pass into the second stage. Then, in the course of two months, these teams developed their proposals on the reconstruction of the park, and on the 16th of September, one day before the announcement of the results, the judging panel, presided by the head of Moscow Culture Department Sergey Kapkov, decided who the winner of the contest would be. This proved to be a tough call: as deputy chairman of the judging panel Marina Lulchuk notes, "each [of the second stage contestants - editor's note] deserved to win the first place and the winner was only identified by the point total". The session continued for more than six hours: the judging panel did not seem to be able to come to the final decision, and it was only the voting by points that helped the members to find the ultimate leader: the concept by Groundlab and Wowhaus that will determine the strategy of the park's development for the next 15 years.

Announcing the name of the contest winner, Sergey Kapkov noted that what the judging panel particularly liked about this project was not only the architectural and "ideological" part but also the sturdy and well thought-out economic model of developing the park by attracting the finances from outside the city budget. Thus the economy of the project became one of the most important criteria of evaluation. Apart from this, close attention was given to the sustainability of all the concepts and the probability of their actual implementation - because the main condition of the contest was keeping the environmental balance.

Sokolniki is one of Moscow's largest parks. It includes more than 500 hectares of green territory, 200 out of which are a natural zone of special protection. At the same time, most of the land (some 300 hectares), separated from the central area by a motorway, remains practically unused by the people. In this connection, the contestants were required to find a solution that would unite these two parts into a single natural complex. Andrew Lapshin, director of Sokolniki, noted that all the prize-winning projects address this issue to some degree - and this also became the decisive factor in choosing the winner. 

The second prize was given to SokoLab project that was presented by the French-Russian consortium headed by Debarre Duplantiers Associes (France). The third place was shared by two projects. According to the point rating, the third place was taken by the project entitled "Vremya Chaya" ("Tea Time" - translator's note) prepared by the consortium headed by Turenscape Architects of China. However, the management of the park also very much liked the project entitled "Sokolniki Park: Legacy Evolution" that was developed by Netherlands' LOLA landscape architects in cooperation with the professionals from Columbia, Russia, and Belgium. Apart from that, a special mention was given to yet another concept presented by the Dutch team MLA+B.V., in which the history of the park gracefully intertwines with the contemporary content. 

Hereby, we are presenting the prize-winning projects: 

First place. "Nature's Embassy".
Authors: Groundlab (Nethelands), Wowhaus (Russia), Institute of Urban Planning "Urbanica" (Russia). 


Oleg Shapiro, one of the authors of the winning project. Photo by Alla Pavlikova


First place. "Nature's Embassy" Project. Authors: Groundlab (Netherlands), Wowhaus (Russia), Institute of urban planning "Urbanica" (Russia).

Oleg Shapiro, leader of Wowhaus:
"Sokolniki is one of Moscow's largest park areas, whose territory is also connected to the Losiny Island. Considering the sheer magnitude of this green territory, we proposed to call our project "Nature's Embassy in Moscow". The main theme of the project became the communication of man and nature on the most various levels: from surveying the wild animals to planting trees and taking care of them. 


First place. "Nature's Embassy" Project. Authors: Groundlab (Netherlands), Wowhaus (Russia), Institute of urban planning "Urbanica" (Russia).

According to our concept, the natural corridor of the Losiny Island will be continued as far as the center of Sokolniki. This huge portion of the park will become a sanctuary totally outside the picture of urban development of the city. From the structural standpoint, the body of the park can be divided into three types of land use. The first one is precisely the belt that connects the Losiny Island to the park. In view of its primeval character, this belt was named "forest" in the project. The second layer is the park land which surrounds the "forest" and which is more accessible for the people. And, finally, the third part is the regular park, located at the entrance to Sokolniki, one that will gather all the entertainment and sport functions.


First place. "Nature's Embassy" Project. Authors: Groundlab (Netherlands), Wowhaus (Russia), Institute of urban planning "Urbanica" (Russia).


First place. "Nature's Embassy" Project. Authors: Groundlab (Netherlands), Wowhaus (Russia), Institute of urban planning "Urbanica" (Russia).


First place. "Nature's Embassy" Project. Authors: Groundlab (Netherlands), Wowhaus (Russia), Institute of urban planning "Urbanica" (Russia).

It was decided that the historical segmental structure of the park would be kept intact but at the same time each clearing will get a function of its own and will be decorated by its own particular plants. The driving map will also be significantly changed. The priority will be given to pedestrians but it will still be impossible to delete the car traffic off the traverse clearing altogether: it is planned that the auto and pedestrian flows will be spaced apart, special consideration given to the dedicated pathways for the animals between Sokolniki and the Losiny Island. 


First place. "Nature's Embassy" Project. Authors: Groundlab (Netherlands), Wowhaus (Russia), Institute of urban planning "Urbanica" (Russia).


First place. "Nature's Embassy" Project. Authors: Groundlab (Netherlands), Wowhaus (Russia), Institute of urban planning "Urbanica" (Russia).


First place. "Nature's Embassy" Project. Authors: Groundlab (Netherlands), Wowhaus (Russia), Institute of urban planning "Urbanica" (Russia).


First place. "Nature's Embassy" Project. Authors: Groundlab (Netherlands), Wowhaus (Russia), Institute of urban planning "Urbanica" (Russia).

Special attention is given to the economic concept of the park's development, according to which particular emphasis will be laid on the work of the expo center and the sport facilities". 


First place. "Nature's Embassy" Project. Authors: Groundlab (Netherlands), Wowhaus (Russia), Institute of urban planning "Urbanica" (Russia).


First place. "Nature's Embassy" Project. Authors: Groundlab (Netherlands), Wowhaus (Russia), Institute of urban planning "Urbanica" (Russia).


First place. "Nature's Embassy" Project. Authors: Groundlab (Netherlands), Wowhaus (Russia), Institute of urban planning "Urbanica" (Russia).

The judging panel especially noted the sustainability of the project coupled with the care for the history of Sokolniki, as well as the conformity of the project to the park's history. 

Second place. SokoLab
Authors: Debarre Duplantiers Associes (France), Ingerop (France), "Prostor" (Russia), Fetish Film (Russia), RDNK (Russia).

Second place. SokoLab Project. Authors: Debarre Duplantiers Associes, Ingerop (France), "Prostor" (Russia), Fetish Film (Russia), RDNK (Russia)


What the judging panel liked about this project was the detailed elaboration and the careful study of the peculiarities of the park. 


Second place. SokoLab Project. Authors: Debarre Duplantiers Associes, Ingerop (France), "Prostor" (Russia), Fetish Film (Russia), RDNK (Russia)


Second place. SokoLab Project. Authors: Debarre Duplantiers Associes, Ingerop (France), "Prostor" (Russia), Fetish Film (Russia), RDNK (Russia)


Second place. SokoLab Project. Authors: Debarre Duplantiers Associes, Ingerop (France), "Prostor" (Russia), Fetish Film (Russia), RDNK (Russia)


Second place. SokoLab Project. Authors: Debarre Duplantiers Associes, Ingerop (France), "Prostor" (Russia), Fetish Film (Russia), RDNK (Russia)


Second place. SokoLab Project. Authors: Debarre Duplantiers Associes, Ingerop (France), "Prostor" (Russia), Fetish Film (Russia), RDNK (Russia)


Second place. SokoLab Project. Authors: Debarre Duplantiers Associes, Ingerop (France), "Prostor" (Russia), Fetish Film (Russia), RDNK (Russia)


Second place. SokoLab Project. Authors: Debarre Duplantiers Associes, Ingerop (France), "Prostor" (Russia), Fetish Film (Russia), RDNK (Russia)


Second place. SokoLab Project. Authors: Debarre Duplantiers Associes, Ingerop (France), "Prostor" (Russia), Fetish Film (Russia), RDNK (Russia)


Second place. SokoLab Project. Authors: Debarre Duplantiers Associes, Ingerop (France), "Prostor" (Russia), Fetish Film (Russia), RDNK (Russia)

Third place. "Sokolniki Park: Evolution Legacy". 
Authors: Lola Landscape architects (Netherlands), Architectural group a3OH (Russia), Taller 301 (Columbia), Land + Civilization Compositions (Netherlands), Symboisis Grontmij Belgium NV (Belgium), Studio Transformer (Russia), Polyester.

Third place. "Sokolniki Park: Legacy Evolution". Authors: Lola Landscape architects (Netherlands), Architectural group ЗОН (Russia), Taller 301 (Columbia), Land + Civilization Compositions (Netherlands), Symboisis Grontmij Belgium NV (Belgium), Studio Transformer (Russia), Polyester


The judging panel gave special mention to the gracefulness and simplicity of the proposals and their possible implementation. For example, in one of the clearings the authors proposed to create a promenade surrounded by the palm trees and on the spot of today's greenhouses - make a huge lawn. 


Third place. "Sokolniki Park: Legacy Evolution". Authors: Lola Landscape architects (Netherlands), Architectural group ЗОН (Russia), Taller 301 (Columbia), Land + Civilization Compositions (Netherlands), Symboisis Grontmij Belgium NV (Belgium), Studio Transformer (Russia), Polyester


Third place. "Sokolniki Park: Legacy Evolution". Authors: Lola Landscape architects (Netherlands), Architectural group ЗОН (Russia), Taller 301 (Columbia), Land + Civilization Compositions (Netherlands), Symboisis Grontmij Belgium NV (Belgium), Studio Transformer (Russia), Polyester


Third place. "Sokolniki Park: Legacy Evolution". Authors: Lola Landscape architects (Netherlands), Architectural group ЗОН (Russia), Taller 301 (Columbia), Land + Civilization Compositions (Netherlands), Symboisis Grontmij Belgium NV (Belgium), Studio Transformer (Russia), Polyester


Third place. "Sokolniki Park: Legacy Evolution". Authors: Lola Landscape architects (Netherlands), Architectural group ЗОН (Russia), Taller 301 (Columbia), Land + Civilization Compositions (Netherlands), Symboisis Grontmij Belgium NV (Belgium), Studio Transformer (Russia), Polyester


Third place. "Sokolniki Park: Legacy Evolution". Authors: Lola Landscape architects (Netherlands), Architectural group ЗОН (Russia), Taller 301 (Columbia), Land + Civilization Compositions (Netherlands), Symboisis Grontmij Belgium NV (Belgium), Studio Transformer (Russia), Polyester


Third place. "Sokolniki Park: Legacy Evolution". Authors: Lola Landscape architects (Netherlands), Architectural group ЗОН (Russia), Taller 301 (Columbia), Land + Civilization Compositions (Netherlands), Symboisis Grontmij Belgium NV (Belgium), Studio Transformer (Russia), Polyester


Third place. "Sokolniki Park: Legacy Evolution". Authors: Lola Landscape architects (Netherlands), Architectural group ЗОН (Russia), Taller 301 (Columbia), Land + Civilization Compositions (Netherlands), Symboisis Grontmij Belgium NV (Belgium), Studio Transformer (Russia), Polyester


Third place. "Sokolniki Park: Legacy Evolution". Authors: Lola Landscape architects (Netherlands), Architectural group ЗОН (Russia), Taller 301 (Columbia), Land + Civilization Compositions (Netherlands), Symboisis Grontmij Belgium NV (Belgium), Studio Transformer (Russia), Polyester


Third place. "Sokolniki Park: Legacy Evolution". Authors: Lola Landscape architects (Netherlands), Architectural group ЗОН (Russia), Taller 301 (Columbia), Land + Civilization Compositions (Netherlands), Symboisis Grontmij Belgium NV (Belgium), Studio Transformer (Russia), Polyester

Third place. "Vremya Chaya" ("Tea Time")


Third place. "Vremya Chaya" ("Tea Time") Project. Authors: Turenscape (China), Strelka (Russia), MIX Design Studio, AECOM LLC (Russia)

Authors: Turenscape (China), Strelka (Russia), MIX Design Studio, AECOM LLC (Russia)
The authors went as far as coming up with a new conceptual name - "Park-Samovar" (an urn with a spigot at its base used in Russia to boil water for tea. - translator's note). The project is predominantly based on the Russian tradition of tea parties. All the park territory is filled with various thematic spots where the visitors can make a stop and have a cup of tea. 


Third place. "Vremya Chaya" ("Tea Time") Project. Authors: Turenscape (China), Strelka (Russia), MIX Design Studio, AECOM LLC (Russia)


Third place. "Vremya Chaya" ("Tea Time") Project. Authors: Turenscape (China), Strelka (Russia), MIX Design Studio, AECOM LLC (Russia)


Third place. "Vremya Chaya" ("Tea Time") Project. Authors: Turenscape (China), Strelka (Russia), MIX Design Studio, AECOM LLC (Russia)


Third place. "Vremya Chaya" ("Tea Time") Project. Authors: Turenscape (China), Strelka (Russia), MIX Design Studio, AECOM LLC (Russia)


Third place. "Vremya Chaya" ("Tea Time") Project. Authors: Turenscape (China), Strelka (Russia), MIX Design Studio, AECOM LLC (Russia)


Third place. "Vremya Chaya" ("Tea Time") Project. Authors: Turenscape (China), Strelka (Russia), MIX Design Studio, AECOM LLC (Russia)


Third place. "Vremya Chaya" ("Tea Time") Project. Authors: Turenscape (China), Strelka (Russia), MIX Design Studio, AECOM LLC (Russia)


Third place. "Vremya Chaya" ("Tea Time") Project. Authors: Turenscape (China), Strelka (Russia), MIX Design Studio, AECOM LLC (Russia)


Third place. "Vremya Chaya" ("Tea Time") Project. Authors: Turenscape (China), Strelka (Russia), MIX Design Studio, AECOM LLC (Russia)
***
Based on the results of the contest, Sokolniki Park will for three months present an exhibition of all the finalists' projects. According to Andrew Lapshin, the most interesting of ideas proposed by the prize winners will still be used in the implementation of the park reconstruction project, while their authors will be invited to take part in the project in their dedicated work areas. Sergey Kapkov also noted that the solutions proposed by the contest participants will surely be employed by the city because presently there will be implemented the mayor-approved program of improving Moscow's park territories: today, more than a hundred park territories have been handed over to the Culture Department that has the task of reconstructing them before 2017. 

The judging panel:
Chairman - Sergey Kapkov, minister of the Moscow government, chief of Moscow Culture Department;
Deputy chairman of the judging panel - Marina Lulchuk, director of "Mosgorpark United Management";
Deputy chairman of the judging panel - Olga Gritsan, chief of the department for development of the park territories of "Mosgorpark United Management";
Julia Kudryashova, deputy head of Moscow Department of Land Use and Conservation;
Digby Whyte, the main executive director of the International Federation of Park and Recreation; 
Eugene Ace, president of the architectural school "MARCH";
Taisia Wolftrub, president of the association of landscape architects of Russia, chief landscape architect of "EMPIRE" architectural bureau;
Elena Gonzales, architectural reviewer, curator of "ArchMoscow" exhibition; 
Elena Solovieva, head of the scientific and project association "Regulation of town-planning activities on the historical territories and protected areas of cultural legacy monuments" of Research and Development Institute of the General Plan of Moscow;
Gabriele Filippini, architect, professor, leader of Studio Arch Gabriele Filippini;
Guillermo Penalosa, expert in the field of the development of city parks, increasing the mobility, and attaching the city people to the transformation of the city environment, executive director of "8-80 Cities" (Canada);
Muriel Russo-Ovchinnikov, the founder and creative director of "Lieu Commun" agency;
Eugenia Galetka, the managing partner and General director of "Journey" event-agency;
Julia Shakhnovskaya, director of the Polytechnic Museum;
Natalia Danilina, director of the ecology education center "Sanctuaries";
Natalia Matveeva, the curator of the department of the gardening monuments under the Agency for preservation of special cultural legacy objects of the Department of Cultural Legacy of Moscow.
First place. "Nature's Embassy" Project. Authors: Groundlab (Netherlands), Wowhaus (Russia), Institute of urban planning "Urbanica" (Russia).
Oleg Shapiro, one of the authors of the winning project. Photo by Alla Pavlikova
First place. "Nature's Embassy" Project. Authors: Groundlab (Netherlands), Wowhaus (Russia), Institute of urban planning "Urbanica" (Russia).
First place. "Nature's Embassy" Project. Authors: Groundlab (Netherlands), Wowhaus (Russia), Institute of urban planning "Urbanica" (Russia).
First place. "Nature's Embassy" Project. Authors: Groundlab (Netherlands), Wowhaus (Russia), Institute of urban planning "Urbanica" (Russia).
First place. "Nature's Embassy" Project. Authors: Groundlab (Netherlands), Wowhaus (Russia), Institute of urban planning "Urbanica" (Russia).
First place. "Nature's Embassy" Project. Authors: Groundlab (Netherlands), Wowhaus (Russia), Institute of urban planning "Urbanica" (Russia).
First place. "Nature's Embassy" Project. Authors: Groundlab (Netherlands), Wowhaus (Russia), Institute of urban planning "Urbanica" (Russia).
First place. "Nature's Embassy" Project. Authors: Groundlab (Netherlands), Wowhaus (Russia), Institute of urban planning "Urbanica" (Russia).
First place. "Nature's Embassy" Project. Authors: Groundlab (Netherlands), Wowhaus (Russia), Institute of urban planning "Urbanica" (Russia).
First place. "Nature's Embassy" Project. Authors: Groundlab (Netherlands), Wowhaus (Russia), Institute of urban planning "Urbanica" (Russia).
First place. "Nature's Embassy" Project. Authors: Groundlab (Netherlands), Wowhaus (Russia), Institute of urban planning "Urbanica" (Russia).
First place. "Nature's Embassy" Project. Authors: Groundlab (Netherlands), Wowhaus (Russia), Institute of urban planning "Urbanica" (Russia).
First place. "Nature's Embassy" Project. Authors: Groundlab (Netherlands), Wowhaus (Russia), Institute of urban planning "Urbanica" (Russia).
Second place. SokoLab Project. Authors: Debarre Duplantiers Associes, Ingerop (France), "Prostor" (Russia), Fetish Film (Russia), RDNK (Russia)
Second place. SokoLab Project. Authors: Debarre Duplantiers Associes, Ingerop (France), "Prostor" (Russia), Fetish Film (Russia), RDNK (Russia)
Second place. SokoLab Project. Authors: Debarre Duplantiers Associes, Ingerop (France), "Prostor" (Russia), Fetish Film (Russia), RDNK (Russia)
Second place. SokoLab Project. Authors: Debarre Duplantiers Associes, Ingerop (France), "Prostor" (Russia), Fetish Film (Russia), RDNK (Russia)
Second place. SokoLab Project. Authors: Debarre Duplantiers Associes, Ingerop (France), "Prostor" (Russia), Fetish Film (Russia), RDNK (Russia)
Second place. SokoLab Project. Authors: Debarre Duplantiers Associes, Ingerop (France), "Prostor" (Russia), Fetish Film (Russia), RDNK (Russia)
Second place. SokoLab Project. Authors: Debarre Duplantiers Associes, Ingerop (France), "Prostor" (Russia), Fetish Film (Russia), RDNK (Russia)
Second place. SokoLab Project. Authors: Debarre Duplantiers Associes, Ingerop (France), "Prostor" (Russia), Fetish Film (Russia), RDNK (Russia)
Second place. SokoLab Project. Authors: Debarre Duplantiers Associes, Ingerop (France), "Prostor" (Russia), Fetish Film (Russia), RDNK (Russia)
Second place. SokoLab Project. Authors: Debarre Duplantiers Associes, Ingerop (France), "Prostor" (Russia), Fetish Film (Russia), RDNK (Russia)
Third place. "Sokolniki Park: Legacy Evolution". Authors: Lola Landscape architects (Netherlands), Architectural group ЗОН (Russia), Taller 301 (Columbia), Land + Civilization Compositions (Netherlands), Symboisis Grontmij Belgium NV (Belgium), Studio Tra
Third place. "Sokolniki Park: Legacy Evolution". Authors: Lola Landscape architects (Netherlands), Architectural group ЗОН (Russia), Taller 301 (Columbia), Land + Civilization Compositions (Netherlands), Symboisis Grontmij Belgium NV (Belgium), Studio Tra
Third place. "Sokolniki Park: Legacy Evolution". Authors: Lola Landscape architects (Netherlands), Architectural group ЗОН (Russia), Taller 301 (Columbia), Land + Civilization Compositions (Netherlands), Symboisis Grontmij Belgium NV (Belgium), Studio Tra
Third place. "Sokolniki Park: Legacy Evolution". Authors: Lola Landscape architects (Netherlands), Architectural group ЗОН (Russia), Taller 301 (Columbia), Land + Civilization Compositions (Netherlands), Symboisis Grontmij Belgium NV (Belgium), Studio Tra
Third place. "Sokolniki Park: Legacy Evolution". Authors: Lola Landscape architects (Netherlands), Architectural group ЗОН (Russia), Taller 301 (Columbia), Land + Civilization Compositions (Netherlands), Symboisis Grontmij Belgium NV (Belgium), Studio Tra
Third place. "Sokolniki Park: Legacy Evolution". Authors: Lola Landscape architects (Netherlands), Architectural group ЗОН (Russia), Taller 301 (Columbia), Land + Civilization Compositions (Netherlands), Symboisis Grontmij Belgium NV (Belgium), Studio Tra
Third place. "Sokolniki Park: Legacy Evolution". Authors: Lola Landscape architects (Netherlands), Architectural group ЗОН (Russia), Taller 301 (Columbia), Land + Civilization Compositions (Netherlands), Symboisis Grontmij Belgium NV (Belgium), Studio Tra
Third place. "Sokolniki Park: Legacy Evolution". Authors: Lola Landscape architects (Netherlands), Architectural group ЗОН (Russia), Taller 301 (Columbia), Land + Civilization Compositions (Netherlands), Symboisis Grontmij Belgium NV (Belgium), Studio Tra
Third place. "Sokolniki Park: Legacy Evolution". Authors: Lola Landscape architects (Netherlands), Architectural group ЗОН (Russia), Taller 301 (Columbia), Land + Civilization Compositions (Netherlands), Symboisis Grontmij Belgium NV (Belgium), Studio Tra
Third place. "Sokolniki Park: Legacy Evolution". Authors: Lola Landscape architects (Netherlands), Architectural group ЗОН (Russia), Taller 301 (Columbia), Land + Civilization Compositions (Netherlands), Symboisis Grontmij Belgium NV (Belgium), Studio Tra
Third place. "Vremya Chaya" ("Tea Time") Project. Authors: Turenscape (China), Strelka (Russia), MIX Design Studio, AECOM LLC (Russia)
Third place. "Vremya Chaya" ("Tea Time") Project. Authors: Turenscape (China), Strelka (Russia), MIX Design Studio, AECOM LLC (Russia)
Third place. "Vremya Chaya" ("Tea Time") Project. Authors: Turenscape (China), Strelka (Russia), MIX Design Studio, AECOM LLC (Russia)
Third place. "Vremya Chaya" ("Tea Time") Project. Authors: Turenscape (China), Strelka (Russia), MIX Design Studio, AECOM LLC (Russia)
Third place. "Vremya Chaya" ("Tea Time") Project. Authors: Turenscape (China), Strelka (Russia), MIX Design Studio, AECOM LLC (Russia)
Third place. "Vremya Chaya" ("Tea Time") Project. Authors: Turenscape (China), Strelka (Russia), MIX Design Studio, AECOM LLC (Russia)
Third place. "Vremya Chaya" ("Tea Time") Project. Authors: Turenscape (China), Strelka (Russia), MIX Design Studio, AECOM LLC (Russia)
Third place. "Vremya Chaya" ("Tea Time") Project. Authors: Turenscape (China), Strelka (Russia), MIX Design Studio, AECOM LLC (Russia)
Third place. "Vremya Chaya" ("Tea Time") Project. Authors: Turenscape (China), Strelka (Russia), MIX Design Studio, AECOM LLC (Russia)
Third place. "Vremya Chaya" ("Tea Time") Project. Authors: Turenscape (China), Strelka (Russia), MIX Design Studio, AECOM LLC (Russia)


18 September 2014

Headlines now
Faraday Grid
The project of the Omsk airport by ASADOV Architects is another concept among the 14 finalists of a recent competition. It is called “The Bridge” and is inspired by both the West Siberian Exhibition of 1911 and the Trans-Siberian Railway bridge over the Irtysh River, built in 1896. On one hand, it carries a steampunk vibe, while on the other, there’s almost a sense of nostalgia for the heyday of 1913. However, the concept offers two variants, the second one devoid of nostalgia but featuring a parabola.
Midway upon the Journey of Our Life
Recently, Tatlin Publishing House released a book entitled “Architect Sergey Oreshkin. Selected Projects”. This book is not just a traditional book of the architectural company’s achievements, but rather a monograph of a more personal nature. The book includes 43 buildings as well as a section with architectural drawings. In this article, we reflect on the book as a way to take stock of an architect’s accomplishments.
Inverted Fortress
This year, there has been no shortage of intriguing architectural ideas around the Omsk airport. The project developed by the architectural company KPLN appeals to Omsk’s history as a wooden fortress that it was back in the day, but transforms the concept of a fortress beyond recognition: it “shaves off” the conical ends of “wooden logs”, then enlarges them, and then flips them over. The result is a hypostyle – a forest of conical columns on point supports, with skylights on top.
Transformation of Annenkirche
For Annenkirche (St. Anna Lutheran Church in St. Petersburg), Sergey Kuznetsov and the Kamen bureau have prepared a project that relies on the principles of the Venice Charter: the building is not restored to a specific date, historical layers are preserved, and modern elements do not mimic the authentic ones. Let’s delve into the details of these solutions.
The Paradox of the Temporary
The concept of the Russian pavilion for EXPO 2025 in Osaka, proposed by the Wowhaus architects, is the last of the six projects we gathered from the 2022 competition. It is again worth noting that the results of this competition were not finalized due to the cancellation of Russia’s participation in World Expo 2025. It should be mentioned that Wowhaus created three versions for this competition, but only one is being presented, and it can’t be said that this version is thoroughly developed – rather, it is done in the spirit of a “student assignment”. Nevertheless, the project is interesting in its paradoxical nature: the architects emphasized the temporary character of the pavilion, and in its bubble-like forms sought to reflect the paradoxes of space and time.
The Forum of Time
The competition project for the Russian Pavilion at EXPO 2025 in Osaka designed by Aleksey Orlov and Arena Project Institute consists of cones and conical funnels connected into a non-trivial composition, where one can feel the hand of architects who have worked extensively with stadiums and other sports facilities. It’s very interesting to delve into its logic, structurally built on the theme of clocks, hourglasses and even sundials. Additionally, the architects have turned the exhibition pavilion into a series of interconnected amphitheaters, which is also highly relevant for world exhibitions. We are reminding you that the competition results were never announced.
Mirrors Everywhere
The project by Sergey Nebotov, Anastasia Gritskova, and the architectural company “Novoe” was created for the Russian pavilion at EXPO 2025, but within the framework of another competition, which, as we learned, took place even earlier, in 2021. At that time, the competition theme was “digital twins”, and there was minimal time for work, so the project, according to the architect himself, was more of a “student assignment”. Nevertheless, this project is interesting for its plan bordering on similarity with Baroque projects and the emblem of the exhibition, as well as its diverse and comprehensive reflectiveness.
The Steppe Is Full of Beauty and Freedom
The goal of the exhibition “Dikoe Pole” (“Wild Field”) at the State Historical Museum was to move away from the archaeological listing of valuable items and to create an image of the steppe and nomads that was multidirectional and emotional – in other words, artistic. To achieve this goal, it was important to include works of contemporary art. One such work is the scenography of the exhibition space developed by CHART studio.
The Snowstorm Fish
The next project from the unfinished competition for the Russian Pavilion at EXPO 2025, which will be held in Osaka, Japan, is by Dashi Namdakov and Parsec Architects. The pavilion describes itself as an “architectural/sculptural” one, with its shape clearly reminiscent of abstract sculpture of the 1970s. It complements its program with a meditative hall named “Mendeleev’s Dreams”, and offers its visitors to slide from its roof at the end of the tour.
The Mirror of Your Soul
We continue to publish projects from the competition for the design of the Russian Pavilion at EXPO in Osaka 2025. We are reminding you that the results of the competition have not been announced, and hardly will ever be. The pavilion designed by ASADOV Architects combines a forest log cabin, the image of a hyper transition, and sculptures made of glowing threads – it focuses primarily on the scenography of the exhibition, which the pavilion builds sequentially like a string of impressions, dedicating it to the paradoxes of the Russian soul.
Part of the Ideal
In 2025, another World Expo will take place in Osaka, Japan, in which Russia will not participate. However, a competition for the Russian pavilion was indeed held, with six projects participating. The results were never announced as Russia’s participation was canceled; the competition has no winners. Nevertheless, Expo pavilion projects are typically designed for a bold and interesting architectural statement, so we’ve gathered all the six projects and will be publishing articles about them in random order. The first one is the project by Vladimir Plotkin and Reserve Union, which is distinguished by the clarity of its stereometric shape, the boldness of its structure, and the multiplicity of possible interpretations.
The Fortress by the River
ASADOV Architects have developed a concept for a new residential district in the center of Kemerovo. To combat the harsh climate and monotonous everyday life, the architects proposed a block type of development with dominant towers, good insolation, facades detailed at eye level, and event programming.
In the Rhombus Grid
Construction has begun on the building of the OMK (United Metallurgical Company) Corporate University in Nizhny Novgorod’s town of Vyksa, designed by Ostozhenka Architects. The most interesting aspect of the project is how the architects immersed it in the context: “extracting” a diagonal motif from the planning grid of Vyksa, they aligned the building, the square, and the park to match it. A truly masterful work with urban planning context on several different levels of perception has long since become the signature technique of Ostozhenka.
​Generational Connection
Another modern estate, designed by Roman Leonidov, is located in the Moscow region and brings together three generations of one family under one roof. To fit on a narrow plot without depriving anyone of personal space, the architects opted for a zigzag plan. The main volume in the house structure is accentuated by mezzanines with a reverse-sloped roof and ceilings featuring exposed beams.
Three Dimensions of the City
We began to delve into the project by Sergey Skuratov, the residential complex “Depo” in Minsk, located at Victory Square, and it fascinated us completely. The project has at least several dimensions to it: historical – at some point, the developer decided to discontinue further collaboration with Sergey Skuratov Architects, but the concept was approved, and its implementation continues, mostly in accordance with the proposed ideas. The spatial and urban planning dimension – the architects both argue with the city and play along with it, deciphering nuances, and finding axes. And, finally, the tactile dimension – the constructed buildings also have their own intriguing features. Thus, this article also has two parts: it dwells on what has been built and what was conceived
New “Flight”
Architects from “Mezonproject” have developed a project for the reconstruction of the regional youth center “Polyot”(“Flight”) in the city of Oryol. The summer youth center, built back in the late 1970s, will now become year-round and acquire many additional functions.
The Yauza Towers
In Moscow, there aren’t that many buildings or projects designed by Nikita Yavein and Studio 44. In this article, we present to you the concept of a large multifunctional complex on the Yauza River, located between two parks, featuring a promenade, a crossroads of two pedestrian streets, a highly developed public space, and an original architectural solution. This solution combines a sophisticated, asymmetric façade grid, reminiscent of a game of fifteen puzzle, and bold protrusions of the upper parts of the buildings, completely masking the technical floors and sculpting the complex’s silhouette.
Arch, Pearl, Wing, Wind
In the social media of the governor of the Omsk region, voting was conducted for the best project for the city’s new airport. We asked the finalists to send over their projects and are now showcasing them. The projects are quite interesting: the client requested that the building be visually permeable throughout, and the images that the architects are working with include arches, wings, gusts of wind, and even the “Pearl” painting by Vrubel, who was actually born in Omsk.
Architecture and Leisure Park
For the suburban hotel complex, which envisages various formats of leisure, the architectural company T+T Architects proposed several types of accommodation, ranging from the classic “standard” in a common building to a “cave in the hill” and a “house in a tree”. An additional challenge consisted in integrating a few classic-style residences already existing on this territory into the “architectural forest park”.
The U-House
The Jois complex combines height with terraces, bringing the most expensive apartments from penthouses down to the bottom floors. The powerful iconic image of the U-shaped building is the result of the creative search for a new standard of living in high-rise buildings by the architects of “Genpro”.
Black and White
In this article, we specifically discuss the interiors of the ATOM Pavilion at VDNKh. Interior design is a crucial component of the overall concept in this case, and precision and meticulous execution were highly important for the architects. Julia Tryaskina, head of UNK interiors, shares some of the developments.
The “Snake” Mountain
The competition project for the seaside resort complex “Serpentine” combines several typologies: apartments of different classes, villas, and hotel rooms. For each of these typologies, the KPLN architects employ one of the images that are drawn from the natural environment – a serpentine road, a mountain stream, and rolling waves.
Opal from Anna Mons’ Ring
The project of a small business center located near Tupolev Plaza and Radio Street proclaims the necessity of modern architecture in a specific area of Moscow commonly known as “Nemetskaya Sloboda” or “German settlement”. It substantiates its thesis with the thoroughness of details, a multitude of proposed and rejected form variants, and even a detailed description of the surrounding area. The project is interesting indeed, and it is even more interesting to see what will come of it.
Feed ’Em All
A “House of Russian Cuisine” was designed and built by KROST Group at VDNKh for the “Rossiya” exhibition in record-breaking time. The pavilion is masterfully constructed in terms of the standards of modern public catering industry multiplied by the bustling cultural program of the exhibition, and it interprets the stylistically diverse character of VDNKh just as successfully. At the same time, much of its interior design can be traced back to the prototypes of the 1960s – so much so that even scenes from iconic Soviet movies of those years persistently come to mind.
The Ensemble at the Mosque
OSA prepared a master plan for a district in the southern part of Derbent. The main task of the master plan is to initiate the formation of a modern comfortable environment in this city. The organization of residential areas is subordinated to the city’s spiritual center: depending on the location relative to the cathedral mosque, the houses are distinguished by façade and plastique solutions. The program also includes a “hospitality center”, administrative buildings, an educational cluster, and even an air bridge.
Pargolovo Protestantism
A Protestant church is being built in St. Petersburg by the project of SLOI architects. One of the main features of the building is a wooden roof with 25-meter spans, which, among other things, forms the interior of the prayer hall. Also, there are other interesting details – we are telling you more about them.
The Shape of the Inconceivable
The ATOM Pavilion at VDNKh brings to mind a famous maxim of all architects and critics: “You’ve come up with it? Now build it!” You rarely see such a selfless immersion in implementation of the project, and the formidable structural and engineering tasks set by UNK architects to themselves are presented here as an integral and important part of the architectural idea. The challenge matches the obliging status of the place – after all, it is an “exhibition of achievements”, and the pavilion is dedicated to the nuclear energy industry. Let’s take a closer look: from the outside, from the inside, and from the underside too.
​Rays of the Desert
A school for 1750 students is going to be built in Dubai, designed by IND Architects. The architects took into account the local specifics, and proposed a radial layout and spaces, in which the children will be comfortable throughout the day.
The Dairy Theme
The concept of an office of a cheese-making company, designed for the enclosed area of a dairy factory, at least partially refers to industrial architecture. Perhaps that is why this concept is very simple, which seems the appropriate thing to do here. The building is enlivened by literally a couple of “master strokes”: the turning of the corner accentuates the entrance, and the shade of glass responds to the theme of “milk rivers” from Russian fairy tales.
The Road to the Temple
Under a grant from the Small Towns Competition, the main street and temple area of the village of Nikolo-Berezovka near Neftekamsk has been improved. A consortium of APRELarchitects and Novaya Zemlya is turning the village into an open-air museum and integrating ruined buildings into public life.