По-русски

​About Uzbekistan With Love

The restoration of the National Pavilion of Uzbekistan at VDNKh, completed in 2025, was at times like a detective story and at times like a drama. Many architectural details seemed to have been irretrievably lost, the 25-meter-high rotunda was on the verge of collapse, and the nuances of the decoration had to be reconstructed from split-second frames of a color documentary film. But the MV-PROEKT architectural bureau managed to untangle this web of problems and literally reassemble one of the most graceful buildings at VDNKh.

28 September 2026
Object
mainImg
The Uzbekistan Pavilion was built twice – in 1939 and yet again in 1954 – to designs by the same architect, Stefan Nikolaevich Polupanov (1904-1957).

The Uzbekistan pavilion at VDNKh
Copyright: © MB-PROJECT


A native of the Kharkiv region who first received an art education and then studied architecture, Polupanov moved to Uzbekistan at the age of 24 and went on to build a distinguished career there. He designed buildings and entire cities, taught, studied the architectural heritage of Central Asia, and published several books: Architectural Monuments of Samarkand (1948) and, together with Yuri Yaralov, Tashkent (1949). His use of Uzbek motifs in the VDNKh pavilion was not a superficial stylization, but the result of two decades of scholarly research. It is painful to think that the architect’s life ended just a few years after the building was completed; he was only 52.

  • zooming
    Stefan Polupanov
    Copyright: Стефан Полупанов. 1939. Wikimedia Commons / Public Domain
  • zooming
    The Uzbekistan pavilion at VDNKh. The plan
    Copyright: © MB-PROJECT


The first prewar building was made of wood and had deteriorated badly over the course of a decade and a half. In 1954, it was dismantled and replaced with a new building, which has survived to this day.

Uzbek SSR Pavilion at the All-Union Agricultural Exhibition, 1957 or 1958
Copyright: Фотография: Thomas Taylor Hammond / Wikimedia Commons / CC BY-SA 4.0


The pavilion has a U-shaped plan, evoking the layout of European palaces of the Early Modern period. The facades of the projecting side wings are articulated with porticos and columns; between them lies a formal courtyard, or “cour d’honneur”. The central façade is decorated with pilasters along its entire length. The entrance is set within a deep niche adorned with openwork rosettes and a majolica panel. Immediately behind the entrance is an entrance hall topped by a skylit dome, with exhibition spaces flanking it on either side.

If we look at the site plan, a broad staircase descends from the building along the central axis, flanked by cascading fountains. At the upper end, at the level of the cour d’honneur, the staircase is adorned with two sculptures: a female cotton picker and a male shepherd.

The building’s interior and exterior walls are lavishly decorated with Central Asian ornamentation executed in a variety of techniques – majolica, wood carving, painted decoration, stained glass, and relief work. The abundance of Eastern motifs greatly softens the pompousness of the Stalinist style.

At the center of the courtyard, above a circular pool with a fountain, rises a gigantic 25-meter-high gazebo-like rotunda. It is, in a sense, the heart of the ensemble. It had no direct prototype in traditional regional architecture – it was entirely the author’s invention. According to one version, Polupanov drew inspiration for its form from a carved Uzbek table.

The Uzbekistan pavilion at VDNKh. The rotunda
Copyright: Photograph © MB-PROJECT


The building’s fate was a dramatic one. In 1966, it was renamed “Soviet Culture” and gradually stripped of all its distinctive features: the cascading fountains were shut off and covered with slabs, the coat of arms of the Uzbek Republic was dismantled, and the sculptures were removed. In the 1990s, as elsewhere at VDNKh, the building housed a clothing market.

In 2019, the pavilion was transferred to Uzbekistan for the creation of a cultural and exhibition center. The restoration project and architectural supervision were carried out by MV-PROEKT.

Scanning Everything

Initially, the plan was for a major renovation without recreating the lost elements, but in 2019 the task became more ambitious: the new client requested the most complete possible restoration of the building’s 1954 appearance.

As a first step, MV-PROEKT carried out a laser scan of the building. The resulting data – millions of points with coordinates in three-dimensional space – were consolidated into a single digital model, enabling specialists to compare the building’s actual condition with archival drawings that had, fortunately, survived at VDNKh.

The Uzbekistan pavilion at VDNKh. The historic drawings
Copyright: © MB-PROJECT


The pavilion had been solidly built: its brick walls were 70 centimeters thick, and it had reinforced-concrete floors. The consequences of careless use had to be addressed: a leaking roof, detached plaster, localized losses of brickwork, later alterations, and numerous layers of paint that disfigured the delicate architectural decoration. The building’s technical systems also needed modernization. At the same time, the ceilings, cornices, pilasters, windows, and doors were all protected heritage elements, so it was forbidden to chase the walls or penetrate the historic structures.

As a result, the new electrical cables were concealed in the baseboards, while the air ducts were hidden above suspended ceilings wherever possible. The architects sought to limit the work to reversible interventions, so that in the event of an emergency, the modern elements could be removed without damaging the original surfaces.

The Interiors

In the central antechamber, the restorers cleaned the glass of the skylit dome and the bands of decorative glazing between the beams surrounding it. The coffered ceilings, molded cornices, ornamental friezes, and plaster rosettes were restored to their original appearance; selected details were highlighted with gilding. The large painted compositions in the ceiling niches – four panels with floral ornament – were recreated using acrylic and tempera paints with gold leaf. The central chandelier, two and a half meters high, was dismantled and reassembled; missing cast details made of aluminum alloy were specially commissioned. At the same time, the pilasters and their crowning capitals, which visually support the complex ceiling structure, were restored.

  • zooming
    The Uzbekistan pavilion at VDNKh. The antehall after the restoration
    Copyright: Photograph © MB-PROJECT
  • zooming
    The Uzbekistan pavilion at VDNKh. The antehall before the restoration
    Copyright: Photograph © MB-PROJECT


The carved doors of the central and side exterior entrances, entirely covered with carved ornament, deserve special mention. In 1954, they were transferred to the new building from the prewar pavilion. Their design was based on the doors of the Gur-e-Amir Mausoleum in Samarkand.

The historic door leaves were removed from their hinges and sent to a specialized workshop. The surfaces were cleaned of dirt, the frames were reinforced, and damaged areas were restored. The intricate three-dimensional ornament required jeweler-like precision, and the work continued for more than three months. Among the interwoven lines, the restorers found the names of the artists – M. Akhmedov and Nurulla Narzullaev.

  • zooming
    The Uzbekistan pavilion at VDNKh. Restoration of the panel with majolicas and rosettes
    Copyright: Photograph © MB-PROJECT
  • zooming
    The Uzbekistan pavilion at VDNKh. Restoration of the panel with majolicas and rosettes. A drawing
    Copyright: © MB-PROJECT


The openwork wooden tracery of the pointed-arch windows is reminiscent of Central Asian latticework known as panjara. By the time work began, the wood was in poor condition, and some of the applied ornament had been lost. Particular attention was paid to the exterior relief decoration: the original plaster appliqués were replaced with aluminum elements with a gold-colored galvanic finish. This made it possible to restore the windows’ functionality while bringing back their former decorative richness.

  • zooming
    The Uzbekistan pavilion at VDNKh. Interiors before restoration. North and South Halls
    Copyright: Photograph © MB-PROJECT
  • zooming
    The Uzbekistan pavilion at VDNKh. The interiors after the restoration
    Copyright: Photograph © MB-PROJECT


In the exhibition halls, the wall paintings and window surrounds were restored. The wooden flooring, which had been covered with plywood and linoleum, had deteriorated beyond repair, so the original parquet was replaced with new oak flooring.

In addition to the light fixtures in the antechamber, the pavilion contained a dozen large chandeliers dating from 1954. Each one was dismantled down to the last screw, cleaned, reassembled, and returned to its original location.

The contemporary exhibition equipment and furniture were deliberately chosen on the principle of contrast – in accordance with the principles of the Venice Charter, so as not to create an illusion of authenticity or mislead visitors.

Even this far-from-complete list of work inside the building gives an idea of the amount of effort the project required. Even more work went into the exterior: the majolica panel, granite base, cornices, and roof parapets were restored, while the coat of arms of Uzbekistan and the inscriptions were recreated based on historical examples. The main challenge, however, was the rotunda.

It Survived

The rotunda is a 25-meter-tall colossus, a gigantic exotic flower rising above the water. Its roof forms a complex twelve-pointed star in plan, while its twelve supports, each assembled from four slender hollow metal columns, resemble stems supporting a broad, openwork bowl. Yet the structure’s apparent lightness is deceptive: the roof consisted of a heavy monolithic reinforced-concrete slab resting on a system of metal beams.

When the engineers began running a computer structural analysis of the rotunda, they discovered that, in its existing form, the structure could not stand in principle. Theoretically, it should have collapsed long ago. A crucial detail was found in the historic drawings: the bundles of columns were supposed to be connected at several points by small metal crosspieces. For some reason, however, these were never installed during construction in 1954.

The Uzbekistan pavilion at VDNKh. The rotunda in an emergency state
Copyright: Photograph © MB-PROJECT


Over the course of seventy years, the pinnacles crowning the rotunda roof had also been lost. They served not only as decoration but also as caps for the hollow columns. Water entered through the resulting openings for decades. Running all the way down to the bases, it corroded the metal from within. Since the supports were regularly repainted on the outside, no one suspected the extent of the corrosion. Dismantling also revealed something else: some elements in the lower sections of the supports had been replaced with plastic. According to Oleg Shurygin, the project’s chief architect, 70% of the rotunda’s metal structures had been lost.

The Uzbekistan pavilion at VDNKh. The rotunda in an emergency state


The entire structure had to be completely dismantled, piece by piece. The metal frame was recreated based on the historic drawings, this time with all the crosspieces and caps specified in the original design. Some of the original carved bases and capitals were preserved, as was the fountain’s central vase. The seemingly weightless Eastern flower was reborn, finally given a truly reliable framework.

The Uzbekistan pavilion at VDNKh. Plan of the rotunda ceiling and roof. Color scheme


The crowning touch was the recreation of the painted decoration on the underside of the openwork canopy. The restorers only learned at the final stage that it had originally been brightly colored rather than monochrome, thanks to a split-second frame from the 1957 Soviet color film An Amazing Sunday: in it, children ran under the rotunda, and the camera briefly tilted upward. It was discovered that the historic decoration had been created by Yakub Raufov (1888-1974), a People’s Artist of Uzbekistan who worked on the rotunda in both 1939 and 1954. He was involved not only in monumental decoration but also in painting household objects, including boxes. Their bright, cheerful palette helped the restorers select the colors for the rotunda. As a result, the interior of the dome was painted in winter – the artists worked at a height of 25 meters, inside a temporary enclosed structure where the temperature was maintained at around 18°C.

The Uzbekistan pavilion at VDNKh. Plan of the pool beneath the rotunda. Color scheme


Finally, the rotunda was reunited with the water. The vase-like central spout was restored, the circular basin around it and the granite coping along its edge were recreated, and the bottom and steps were finished with glazed porcelain tiles featuring a national ornament.

Cascade Fountains

But even this was not the end of the almost detective-story-like saga of the restoration of the Uzbekistan Pavilion at VDNKh. A true engineering marvel were the two cascade fountains that began right at the building’s walls, beneath the colonnades of the side wings, and descended alongside the grand staircase. Technical rooms with pumping and water-treatment equipment were located beneath the fountains. Their lighting was particularly ingenious: spotlights directed light through the water, while the fixtures themselves were installed in special dry niches, with the water flowing through openings engineered so that it never came into contact with the lights. For 1954, this was an astonishingly elegant technical solution – and even today, it arguably remains one.

The Uzbekistan pavilion at VDNKh. The main facade and fountains after restoration


The cascades were later covered with concrete slabs, which were removed during the restoration. The surviving structures were too badly damaged, so the pools and their decorative finishes were essentially recreated from scratch. The historic effect of glowing water was recreated using modern watertight light fixtures.

The Uzbekistan pavilion at VDNKh. Cascade fountain construction. The geometric ornament (“girih”) matches the pattern on the rotunda ceiling


The only elements that could not be returned to their original locations were two monumental panels on the pavilion walls – The Great Fergana Canal and The Cascades of the Chirchiq Hydroelectric Power Plants, by Pyotr Kotov (1889-1953), an Honored Artist of the RSFSR. The streams of water painted by the artist seemed to flow out of the pictures and continue in the actual cascades descending alongside the grand staircase. The panels and fountains formed a unified pictorial and architectural composition.

The pavilion celebrated many achievements of the Uzbek Republic – in sericulture, horticulture, viticulture, animal husbandry, industry, and culture. But the symbolic essence of the architectural concept lay in irrigation and electrification: these were what enabled Uzbekistan to become one of the world’s leading cotton producers.

  • zooming
    1 / 4
    The Uzbekistan pavilion at VDNKh. The decorative lattice
  • zooming
    2 / 4
    The Uzbekistan pavilion at VDNKh
    Copyright: © MB-PROJECT
  • zooming
    3 / 4
    The Uzbekistan pavilion at VDNKh. The pinnacle
    Copyright: © MB-PROJECT
  • zooming
    4 / 4
    The Uzbekistan pavilion at VDNKh. The decorative column
    Copyright: © MB-PROJECT


The theme of cotton runs like a red thread through the pavilion’s architecture. Stylized cotton leaves and branches appear in the ornament of the majolica, facade reliefs, and decorative grilles, and are repeated in the patterns of the friezes and capitals. The motif moves from the two-dimensional surface into three-dimensional form, becoming almost an architectural element in its own right.

The Uzbekistan pavilion at VDNKh. Roof pinnacles before and after restoration


A number of art objects on the pavilion roof are in fact pinnacles shaped like opened cotton bolls. The architect deliberately designed them in different sizes, taking into account the effects of perspective distortion when viewed from below. All these details were restored to their original appearance.

Terrazzo and Sculpture

Restoring the terrazzo paving in the plaza around the rotunda was a separate engineering challenge. This unique four-color marble “carpet,” with its complex geometric pattern, is considered the largest terrazzo surface at VDNKh. In the plaza in front of the pavilion, it was recreated from scratch, while beneath the colonnades, the original sections were preserved and restored.

The Uzbekistan pavilion at VDNKh. Terrazzo restoration


To prevent rainwater from pooling on the open plaza, the designers had to calculate a complex system of slopes while making the drainage channels almost invisible so as not to disrupt the ornamental pattern.

Two monumental sculptures have reappeared beside the pavilion’s side wings, next to the cascade fountains: Shepherd and Karakul Breeder and Cotton Picker, created in 1954 by Zinaida Snigir (1912-1989). The man is depicted with lambs and a Karakul sheep, while the woman is shown with a book and a cotton plant; both wear the stars of Heroes of Socialist Labor on their chests. Researchers were unable to establish the names of their real-life models.

  • zooming
    The Uzbekistan pavilion at VDNKh. Restored sculpture Shepherd and Karakul Breeder
  • zooming
    The Uzbekistan pavilion at VDNKh. Restored sculpture “Cotton Picker”
    Copyright: Photograph © MB-PROJECT


The sculptures were recreated almost blindly, based on several blurry archival photographs taken from the front and side. The work was led by sculptor Vladimir Trulov. The figures were cast in concrete, the same material used for the originals.

…The renovated pavilion officially opened to the public on October 5, 2023. By that time, all five spaces were already in operation: the Central Cultural Heritage Hall, the halls of applied arts and 19th- and 20th-century painting, the tourism section, and the New Uzbekistan multifunctional hall. The entire restoration project was completed in 2025.

The Uzbekistan pavilion at VDNKh. “Tourism Potential of Uzbekistan” Hall


The Uzbekistan pavilion at VDNKh. Applied Arts Hall


Credit is due to the specialists at MV-PROEKT, who took such care with the project: they developed a detailed roadmap, found worthy subcontractors, and orchestrated a monumental collective effort.

Just as important was the role of the government of the Republic of Uzbekistan, which commissioned the project and provided funding for such a large-scale and long-term undertaking.

The Uzbekistan pavilion at VDNKh. Uzbekistan coat of arms on the facade. Design


The most important result of the restoration, however, is the renewed discovery of this remarkable architectural monument. Had the work been limited to superficial repairs, we would probably have continued to view all this VDNKh exoticism as a kind of “Potemkin village”. The element of ostentatious prosperity embedded in the very idea of the exhibition is, of course, undeniable. Yet the restorers’ deep immersion in the pavilion’s history and construction made it possible to see the many layers of meaning behind the ideological facade and to fully appreciate the intentions of its creators. This handcrafted, intricately conceived, technically ingenious, and formally utterly original architecture inspires, however involuntary, genuine admiration.

28 September 2026

Headlines now
​About Uzbekistan With Love
The restoration of the National Pavilion of Uzbekistan at VDNKh, completed in 2025, was at times like a detective story and at times like a drama. Many architectural details seemed to have been irretrievably lost, the 25-meter-high rotunda was on the verge of collapse, and the nuances of the decoration had to be reconstructed from split-second frames of a color documentary film. But the MV-PROEKT architectural bureau managed to untangle this web of problems and literally reassemble one of the most graceful buildings at VDNKh.
​Lighthouse on the Cliff
One of the neighborhoods in Desnarechye, a large-scale district under construction in New Moscow, is being designed by the architectural company Krupny Plan (KPLN). The site has its advantages and challenges: on the one hand, the river is close by and the landscape is expressive; on the other, there is a highway and a change in elevation. The architects decided to emphasize the site’s existing “texture”: they placed a lighthouse-like tower as a landmark on the natural high ground, made the podium a continuation of the cliff, and reflected the proximity of the river in the architecture of the sectional buildings.
Geology-Scale Architecture
A “geological,” nature-inspired form for large-scale complexes is one of the important themes of our time; it suits large volumes much better than pilasters and cornices. The project with the geographical name Latitude 54, proposed by Rais Baishev and the architects of Ostozhenka, likewise “grows” into the ground through a preserved ravine, while upward it rises in slabs of buildings resembling chalk mountains, with courtyards and terraces carved into their mass like caves. Its distinctive feature is the abundance of shared spaces open to both city residents and local inhabitants, along with an emphasis on high-quality construction. Large expanses of glazing, and even centralized air conditioning. Let us examine the project in context.
​Full-Cycle Art
A school requires order, regulations, and discipline, while creativity calls for freedom, experimentation, and improvisation. In the building of the Siberian Higher School of Musical and Theatrical Arts in Kemerovo, MV-PROEKT made an attempt to reconcile these contradictions: to contain a complex and ever-changing creative life within a strict, rationally organized architectural form.
The Romance of a Saint Petersburg Courtyard
Studio 44’s approach to the redevelopment of the Liviz winery site appears to be an important precedent for Saint Petersburg: the architects are adapting not only designated heritage buildings but also other more-than-a-century old structures, revealing their distinctive character and giving them new public or residential uses. New architecture is interwoven with the old, creating a range of clearly defined or deliberately complex urban spaces. Blocks of different typologies are complemented by a pedestrian promenade that makes the environment much more permeable and lively. And all of this is framed by a sense of romance and nostalgia for the historic city.
The Voice of the Amur
MV-PROJECT has won a competition for the façades of the Khabarovsk Regional Academic Musical Theater. The architects took a bold approach, proposing a striking wave-like envelope inspired by the waters of the Amur, along with landscaped rooftop terraces. The concept won an absolute majority of the public vote. We take a closer look at the proposal, its feasibility, and its rich imagery, which invites associations with the work of Ivan Aivazovsky and Katsushika Hokusai.
A Theater for Figure Skaters, or Cherchez La Femme
Ice arenas are typologically close to industrial buildings: enormous windowless halls with minimal architectural embellishment. In designing Navka Arena, Yuliy Borisov and the UNK architects did not try to fight the utilitarian nature of the structure. Instead, they concentrated all of its expressive elements in one place – the central façade. A parabolic canopy, a monumental sculpture of a figure skater, and her shadow rendered in perforated metal transform an ordinary sports “box” into an architectural statement about ice, movement, and theater.
The Soft Forms of a New Enlightenment
The school that will rise amid the new high-rise neighborhoods of Set and Veer can fairly be called a landmark of the future district. The educational environment was designed by IMAGO, a firm specializing in learning spaces, while the façade concept was selected through a competition. The winner, GAFA, proposed a regular grid of three-dimensional modules that creates an intriguing effect of “soft” architecture. The imagery of this solution appeals to children of different ages and suits the stature of the educational complex, which will be handed over to the highly rated School No. 1329 upon completion.
Projection of a Spiral, Projection of a Wave
Architects from Mezonsproekt have designed a high-rise residential complex of four towers near the intersection of Novaya Riga Highway and the Moskva River. Its landmark status is motivated both by the proximity of Rublyovo-Arkhangelskoye and its SberCity development, and by the theme of two intersecting flows: water and traffic. The architects have organized the façade pattern around the supergraphic image of a pixelated spiral, intended to animate – and perhaps even transform – the perception of the buildings’ prismatic volumes.
​The Ever-Changing Mist
T+T Architects has developed a concept for a premium business center featuring “living” façades that change their configuration depending on weather conditions, time of day, and the occupants’ needs, transforming the building into an urban-scale installation. The idea of endless variability continues inside, with interiors designed to accommodate different scenarios of use. Some of the engineering solutions proposed for the project are being introduced to the Russian commercial real estate market for the first time.
​A Small Book of Farewell
The book dedicated to Valery Kanyashin, published by his colleagues at Ostozhenka Architects, is remarkably small. It fits comfortably in the palm of your hand, more like sketchbook than an actual architectural monograph. Combined with its tiny print run, the result is an intentionally unglamorous, decidedly non-representational publication – one that is made “for friends”. Yet the way it weaves together projects, texts, photographs, and drawings is remarkably subtle. Perhaps this is precisely how one comes to understand a person, at least a little, by tracing the course of their creative life.
Win-Win
For Perm, the opening of the new home for its Art Gallery – guardian of the famous collection of Perm wooden sculpture – marks the end of a 35-year search for a building worthy of a collection that had long outgrown the city cathedral that had served as its only home. Sergey Tchoban considers the project one of the most important of his career in Russia and emphasizes that it deliberately avoids “iconic” architecture in favor of contextual appropriateness. We traveled to Perm to explore both the building and its extensive new exhibition, and found that, much like Tchoban’s other museum projects, it is conceived in a distinctly contemporary way: the old and the new do not merely coexist but reinforce one another through contrast, sharpening the visitor’s perception of the museum.
A Score for 12th Line
“Amo”, a residential complex designed by Stepan Liphart on Vasilyevsky Island, brings together three architectural ideas: the cour d’honneur, a piazzetta-like courtyard, and imagery borrowed from Renaissance architecture. Together, these elements make a contemporary apartment complex feel more humane, extending the theme of individuality in residential design. The effect is achieved through a carefully calibrated vocabulary of moderately standardized components: recessed façade panels enriched with sgraffito ornament, a disciplined hierarchy of cornices and moldings, and a series of bespoke decorative details. The development combines residential and hotel sections that frame the restored wooden mansion of the Brömme brothers.
Riverfront Façade
The Premium residential complex, designed by KPLN, has been built in the town of Pushkino, just outside Moscow, on the banks of the Serebryanka River. Its two towers reinforce the scale of the high-rise development that emerged here in the 2000s, while introducing a bolder architectural form that reads more effectively from a distance, along with a system of contrasts and design strategies responding to the site’s waterfront setting. One of the project’s distinctive features is a series of metal discs that conceal air-conditioning units while serving as an additional decorative layer.
A Construction Set for Adult Life
In the project by Atrium, the new building for Moscow’s School No. 2107, designed to accommodate 1,100 students, is above all a carefully organized system of learning and recreational spaces. On the one hand, it is complex and highly articulated; on the other, it remains intuitive, safe, and conducive to personal growth. In a sense, it serves as a model of life in the city – a place where one must communicate, make decisions, plan ahead, and find a balance between work and leisure. All of these scenarios are reflected, to varying degrees, in the building’s architecture.
Axis of Rotation
One of the installations in the Masters exhibition at Arch Moscow featured a futuristic yet entirely feasible project by Vladimir Plotkin and TPO Reserve – a tower that could be assembled from prefabricated factory-made modules. The concept even incorporates the possibility of slow rotation (!). Using the same module, one could create a residential block, a giant cantilevered “arrow”, or virtually any other configuration you could possibly think of. Let us take a closer look at the module itself.
A New Magazine and a New Ranking
The magazine Expert.Urban has only just appeared, apparently timed to coincide with Arch Moscow. It is published with the support of VEB.RF and Strelka KB. We have not yet had time to read it cover to cover, but the impression so far is that it consists of about eighty percent interviews. It also features a distinctly “Strelka-style” initiative: a ranking of the “Best Architect of Moscow in the 21st Century”. So, who came out on top? Sergey Skuratov. Yuri Grigoryan took second place, and Sergei Tchoban came third.
Oleg Shapiro: “We design life as a whole, in all of its diversity”
Wowhaus has long since outgrown its association with “urban improvement” projects alone. One of its newer directions is neo-industrialization. Another is large-scale master planning. Yet work on Gorky Park is once again underway – only now on a more systematic and far-reaching level. In this interview, we simultaneously revisit Rem Koolhaas, Strelka, and the history of attention to the “urban environment”, while also exploring what exactly Wowhaus is working on today and how the company operates – with its nine divisions and approximately 160 employees.
Red Card for Copyright
The development concept for the territory of Shinnik Stadium in Yaroslavl, prepared by PI ARENA, took second place in an open call competition. The architects proposed a unified structure combining a football arena, a hotel, and the headquarters of PSB Bank, with carefully considered usage scenarios. However, the competition was organized in such a way that the team ultimately chose to forgo the prize money in order to retain their copyright.
CinemaHologram
Not long ago, the Moscow authorities approved the project for a new House of Cinema complex by Kleinewelt Architekten. The original 1968 building could not be preserved – yet the architects managed to save its stained-glass panels, metal reliefs, and even the volumetric parameters of the structure, which will continue to house the Union of Cinematographers and cinema halls. The project’s main focal point, however, will be a residential tower. We examine its sculptural qualities and its allusions within the Moscow context.
Form as Method: TPO Reserve
At the core of the concept developed by Vladimir Plotkin and TPO Reserve lies an unconventional morphology that addresses functional challenges beyond purely formal concerns. Above all, however, it serves expressiveness and creates a rare kind of spatial and emotional experience, as becomes evident when examining the project’s key solutions. We studied it in detail, and it was all worth it. Our interpretation is that what drives this project is neither style nor even metaphor, but rather a method.
Mound of Memory
The competition proposal for a memorial complex on the Pulkovo Heights by Studio 44 will not be realized, yet it deserves attention as an intriguing example of how architecture can symbolize traumatic events and thereby contribute to their processing and integration into human experience. The architects also succeed in combining memorial and recreational functions without slipping either into excessive dramatization or oversimplification. The project develops ideas explored in two earlier competition entries that likewise remained unbuilt – the Museum of the Siege of Leningrad and the Tuchkov Buyan park. It also recalls the mound-like hill that Alexander Nikolsky embodied in the form of the now-lost stadium on Krestovsky Island.
Home Base
Working on the new building for Letovo Junior School – opened to students in autumn 2025 in the MSU Valley – the architects of UNK, following the client’s vision, subordinated both façades and interiors to the theme of “home”. Multiple variations of pitched roofs, a city skyline traced across glass balustrades, wooden textures, and a whole series of micro-spaces for retreat within public areas are all at the disposal of primary and middle school students. We take a closer look at the new school building – and at how it interprets current trends in educational environments.
Doubles Match
The architecture of the Tennis Palace built in Luzhniki Olympic Complex, designed by Arena Design Institute, was shaped by three factors: the proximity of the brutalist Druzhba Arena, the closeness of the Moskva River and the metro bridge overpass, as well as the specifics of the function – tennis courts require large spans, abundant light, yet at the same time protection from direct sunlight. The architects divided the building into several blocks, playing on contrast, which is further emphasized by the façades developed in collaboration with TPO Reserve and Vladimir Plotkin.
Microdynamics of Macroprocesses
Given the proximity of the multifunctional complex SOLOS to Sokolniki Park and to a major transport hub, Kleinewelt Architekten embedded in the design of the two high-rise towers a sense of dynamism more characteristic of natural phenomena than of man-made objects. Without the authors’ diagrams, this logic is not easy to decipher, although the eye immediately detects a pattern and tries to grasp it. It seems to us that one tower contains the impulse of a bud about to open, while the other evokes the movement of a lithospheric plate. Let us try to unravel it together.
The Space of Post-Cubism
Sergei Tchoban and Alexandra Sheiner, of Studio CHART, created for the exhibition of “post-cubist” sculpture by Beatrice Sandomirskaya – a talented and even “mainstream” artist, yet almost unknown even to art historians – a space akin to her sculptural language: solidly built, confidently stereometric, and subtly expressive. It curves, emphasizing the mass of the sculpture, envelops the viewer, and guides them from one perspective to another, from a generic “shrine” to a “Madonna”.
The Value of Open Space
For the site near the Barrikadnaya Metro Station, Sergey Skuratov developed five projects between 2020 and 2025. Two of them were ones that won the client’s invitation-only competitions. The fifth was recently selected by the Mayor of Moscow for implementation. The project is vivid and sculptural, expressive, eye-catching, and engaging – very much in line with the spirit of our time. And yet, this project is mid-rise rather than tall. In its northwestern part, near the metro and Druzhinnikovskaya Street, it shapes a comfortable urban environment. On the opposite side, it opens up, allowing sunlight into the courtyard and creating a spatial pause within the dense city fabric. How it is organized, what geometric principles underlie it, and why it takes this form – all this is explored in our article.
Coming From the Cold
The ArchBukhta Festival remains one of the few events in Russia where participants go through the entire process of creating an architectural object – from concept to construction. And they do so on the shores of Lake Baikal, in dedication to it. This year, GAFA took part and shared its experience: a local legend, a team-specific design code, friendship, as well as ice skating and endurance in freezing temperatures all contributed to gaining something more than just an award.
​Gothic Panorama
The Panorama residential complex is known for the fact that there is no panorama in it, nor is there a panorama of it – instead, there is a “viewing slit” that opens up a glimpse of the Neo-Gothic Polish church. And the opening itself is Gothic, S-shaped. It was also this building that started the fashion for colored pixelated facades and colored glass in Moscow; yet it has remained the best example so far. Anatoly Belov on irony in the Panorama residential complex. In memory of Valery Knyashin.
Symphony of Water and Brick
The Alter residential complex, designed by Stepan Liphart and built on a bend of the Okhta River, is an example of a “drawn house”: the number of original architectural details is virtually immeasurable. As a result, ribs, projections, and recesses create a picturesque silhouette even without a significant variation in height. Both composition and material respond to the proximity of the river and to the red-brick factory building dating back to the early 20th century. The project was also significantly shaped by recommendations from the city’s chief architect. More details in our article.